DOCSLIB.ORG

I “…Neither the Flower Nor the Insect Will Ever Understand the Significance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I “…Neither the Flower Nor the Insect Will Ever Understand the Significance View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University i “…neither the flower nor the insect will ever understand the significance of their lovemaking. I mean, how could they know that because of their little dance the world lives? But it does. By simply doing what they're designed to do, something large and magnificent happens.” - John Laroche, from the film Adaptation ii Comparison of Chiloglottis valida (left) and Chiloglottis aff. jeanesii (right) iii THE EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF POLLINATION: STUDIES IN A GENUS OF AUSTRALIAN SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS MICHAEL ROBERT WHITEHEAD JULY, 2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY iv DECLARATION The research presented in this thesis is my own original work except where due reference is given in the text. All the chapters were the product of investigations carried out jointly with others but in all cases I am the principal contributor to the work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any previous degree. ……………………………………………….. Michael Robert Whitehead July, 2012 v THESIS PLAN This thesis is presented in six chapters. Figures appear at the end of each chapter. All photographs and images are my own. Chapters 1, 3-6 are either published, submitted for publication or presented as manuscripts intended for submission. As such, the pronoun “we” is used to represent co–authors in material intended for publication. Below I outline the contribution of my co–authors: Chapter 1: Integrating floral scent, pollination ecology and population genetics I performed the literature review, conceptual development and writing. Rod Peakall (RP) contributed written material based on his own work, the conceptual development of the chapter and editorial comments. Published as article: Whitehead, M.R. and Peakall, R. (2009) Integrating floral scent, pollination ecology and population genetics. Functional Ecology 23, 863-874. Chapter 2: Introduction to Chiloglottis: a model system for plant–pollinator studies. I was sole author and contributor to this chapter. Chapter 3: Pollinator specificity and strong pre–pollination reproductive isolation in sympatric sexually deceptive orchids. I was responsible for: field sampling and design, laboratory work, symbiotic orchid culture, writing, statistical analyses. Christine Hayes and RP contributed to additional chemical and genetic data collection and analyses. vi Chapter 4: Multiple paternity and outcrossing in self-compatible clonal orchids. I was responsible for field sampling, study design, symbiotic orchid culture, laboratory work, analysis and writing. RP contributed programming and development of the GENALEX simulation and paternity exclusion routine. Chapter 5: Microdot technology for individual marking of small arthropods. I was responsible for all design, field work, writing and statistical analyses. RP offered editorial comments. Published as article: Whitehead, M.R. and Peakall, R. (2012) Microdot technology for individual marking of small arthropods. Agricultural and Forestry Entomology 14, 171-175. Chapter 6: Short term but not long term patch avoidance in an orchid-pollinating solitary wasp. I was responsible for design, field work, writing and statistical analyses. Murray Efford, author of SECR software, contributed direction to analyses. RP provided editorial comments. Whitehead, M.R. and Peakall, R. Short term but not long term patch avoidance in an orchid-pollinating solitary wasp Behavioral Ecology, in revision. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for the many contributing forces, small and large, that have allowed me to carry out this project. These many influences have all in some way allowed me to learn, develop, teach, write, speak and travel all in the name of my peculiar study plants. I am grateful that I not only got the opportunity to indulge my interest in this field, but that I was able to make it my prime occupation for the last 4.5 years. Among them: My supervisor Rod Peakall whose expert supervision, unfailing availability, unflagging support, strategic advice, deep scientific expertise and creative accounting have kept me in the game at every stage of the way. Utmost gratitude to you for being a pleasure to work with and generously sharing your first research love. The Australian Pacific Science Foundation, for supplying primary funding and taking a punt on an honours student. Vic Stephens at DataDot for the positive support. Christine Hayes for unparalleled lab support. I will be surprised if I encounter such experience and efficiency in the lab ever again, and I am supremely grateful I was able to benefit from it. Celeste Linde, my mycology guru, tutor and occasional counsellor. Your advice is always refreshing, grounded and highly valued. Friends and colleagues at UNSW. Bill Sherwin who mentored me. Lee Ann Rollins for always encouraging words, Clare Holleley for sharing her PhD and Emily Miller for the fun and belief in me. I wouldn’t have started without your support from all of you. Maurizio Rossetto, a mentor and friend. I was more scarce during the project than I would have liked, but your perspective and energy was always valuable. Emily Miller, Thomas Wallenius, Myles Menz, Yann Triponez, Rachel Slatyer, Kate Griffiths, Samantha Vertucci, Peri Bolton, Tonya Haff, Hanna Kokko for sharing field work, whether fun or dull! viii Leon Smith for always being generous with his time and practical lab knowledge. ANU friends; Renee Catullo, Brian Mautz, Jules Livingston, Mitzy Pepper, Sophia Callander, Anja Skroblin, Andrew Kahn, Jussi Lehtonen, Hanna Kokko, Michael Jennions, Dave Rowell, Rob Lanfear, Tonya Haff, Isobel Booksmythe, Richie and Melita Milner, Thomas Wallenius, Renae Pratt, Richard Carter, Dave Moore, Dom Roche, Sandra Binning, Duncan Fitzpatrick. Biologists are the best people and you’re proof. Jules Livingston, Michael Jennions, Renee Catullo, Brian Garms, Emily Miller. At a critical point all of these people said something I needed to hear. Samantha Vertucci, for her love, company and support, especially in these final moments. She, more than any other, endured the grumpy mood and self–absorption that can be occasional by products of PhD research. Love you kid. You make things better. My brothers Michael Farrell, Nick Evershed, Matt Faulkner, Ben Zemanek, James Barrett for continued friendship as solid as the Hume Highway is long. My full-sibs for being my best friends and needing only to appear in my thoughts to make me laugh. You lighten my spirit and I love you both. Mum and Dad, for encouraging my interests, imbuing me with optimism, lovingly supporting me and making me who I am. I love you. Thank you finally to my study species. At no point did you bite me, defecate on me, run away from me, require me to stay up late, get up early or burden me in excessive bureaucracy and paperwork. I don’t know why every biologist doesn’t want to work on pollination! ix PRÉCIS There are few other structures in nature from which evolution has generated such wide diversity as the flower or inflorescence, and this diversity is commonly attributed to the influence of their animal visitors. By outsourcing their mate choice to pollinators, plants have left themselves—and especially their flowers—subject to the selective forces imposed by the behaviour, cognition and perception of the pollinators that serve them. The orchids provide some of the most remarkable and extreme examples of adaptations to specific animal pollinators. Perhaps one of the most peculiar of these strategies is sexual deception, whereby male insects are lured to the flower by mimicry of the female sex pheromone. This seemingly unlikely strategy has evolved multiple times independently on different continents in different parts of the orchid phylogeny which raises the question of what adaptive advantages might underlie such a strategy. This multidisciplinary thesis studies gene flow and pollinator behaviour in two sympatric sexually deceptive orchids in the genus Chiloglottis. The two species attract their specific wasp pollinators through emission of distinct species–specific semiochemicals. Since floral volatiles play a pre–eminent role in pollinator attraction, Chiloglottis provides an excellent case study for examining the interaction between floral volatile chemistry, pollinator behaviour and the evolutionary dynamics of populations. The thesis begins with a review of floral volatiles and their role in pollinator attraction and plant speciation. The literature is used to develop a research framework of six testable hypotheses under which we might productively explore the influence of floral volatiles on plant evolution. These hypotheses are then explored in the study system over the following chapters. A study of pollinator specificity, neutral genetic differentiation and floral chemistry demonstrates that the chemical mimicry crucial to sexual deception is responsible for reproductive isolation and potentially even speciation. Mating system and paternity x analysis provide the first genetic evidence for multiple paternity in orchid broods. Extensive outcrossing is found to predominate and paternity assignment shows evidence for long distance pollen flow supporting the hypothesis that sexual deception promotes outcrossing and so minimizes the potentially the deleterious effects of selfing. Lastly, an innovative new method is developed for tracking wasps in the field. Application of this technique to a population of orchid-pollinating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Discovery of 2,5-Dialkylcyclohexan-1,3-Diones As a New Class of Natural Products
    The discovery of 2,5-dialkylcyclohexan-1,3-diones as a new class of natural products S. Frankea, F. Ibarraa, C. M. Schulza, R. Twelea, J. Poldyb, R. A. Barrowb, R. Peakallc, F. P. Schiestld, and W. Franckea,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; bDepartment of Chemistry and cDepartment of Botany and Zoology, School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia; and dInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zu¨rich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zu¨rich, Switzerland Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved March 31, 2009 (received for review January 22, 2009) Orchids employing sexual deceit attract males of their pollinator candidate compounds, followed by coupled gas chromatography/ species through specific volatile signals that mimic female-released mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to determine their chemical struc- sex pheromones. One of these signals proved to be 2-ethyl-5- tures. Confirmation of biological activity with synthetic com- propylcyclohexan-1,3-dione (chiloglottone1), a new natural prod- pounds during field bioassays was the final essential step (11–13). uct that was shown to be most important in the relations between A milestone in the understanding of thynnine wasp phero- orchids of the genus Chiloglottis, native to Australia, and corre- mones and the attractive principles of orchids that mimic them sponding pollinator species. Systematic investigations on the mass has been the identification of 2-ethyl-5-propylcyclohexan-1,3- spectrometric fragmentation pattern of 2,5-dialkylcyclohexan-1,3- dione, chiloglottone1, formerly called chiloglottone, as the de- diones identified key ions providing information about the struc- cisive compound involved in the chemical mimicry used by tures of the substituents at positions 2 and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Historical Biogeography, Diversification, Antarctica and The
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Orchid historical biogeography, ARTICLE diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal Thomas J. Givnish1*, Daniel Spalink1, Mercedes Ames1, Stephanie P. Lyon1, Steven J. Hunter1, Alejandro Zuluaga1,2, Alfonso Doucette1, Giovanny Giraldo Caro1, James McDaniel1, Mark A. Clements3, Mary T. K. Arroyo4, Lorena Endara5, Ricardo Kriebel1, Norris H. Williams5 and Kenneth M. Cameron1 1Department of Botany, University of ABSTRACT Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, Aim Orchidaceae is the most species-rich angiosperm family and has one of USA, 2Departamento de Biologıa, the broadest distributions. Until now, the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny has Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 3Centre for Australian National Biodiversity prevented analyses of orchid historical biogeography. In this study, we use such Research, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, a phylogeny to estimate the geographical spread of orchids, evaluate the impor- 4Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, tance of different regions in their diversification and assess the role of long-dis- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, tance dispersal (LDD) in generating orchid diversity. 5 Santiago, Chile, Department of Biology, Location Global. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Methods Analyses use a phylogeny including species representing all five orchid subfamilies and almost all tribes and subtribes, calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. We estimated historical biogeography and assessed the
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Origin of the Orchidaceae from a Fossil Orchid with Its Pollinator
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6111228 Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Article in Nature · September 2007 DOI: 10.1038/nature06039 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 211 770 5 authors, including: Santiago R Ramírez Barbara Gravendeel University of California, Davis Leiden University, Naturalis Biodiversity Center & University of Applied Sciences L… 50 PUBLICATIONS 999 CITATIONS 208 PUBLICATIONS 2,081 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Rodrigo B. Singer Naomi E Pierce Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Harvard University 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,381 CITATIONS 555 PUBLICATIONS 6,496 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Insect endosymbiont diversity View project Support threatened research Institutions from Southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Barbara Gravendeel on 31 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Vol 448 | 30 August 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature06039 LETTERS Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Santiago R. Ramı´rez1, Barbara Gravendeel2, Rodrigo B. Singer3, Charles R. Marshall1,4 & Naomi E. Pierce1 Since the time of Darwin1, evolutionary biologists have been fas- subfamily showed that the size, shape and ornamentation of the cinated by the spectacular adaptations to insect pollination exhib- fossil closely resemble those of modern members of the subtribe ited by orchids. However, despite being the most diverse plant Goodyerinae, particularly the genera Kreodanthus and Microchilus family on Earth2, the Orchidaceae lack a definitive fossil record (Supplementary Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Ecology of Pollination in Deceptive Ceropegia
    Chemical Ecology of Pollination in Deceptive Ceropegia CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF POLLINATION IN DECEPTIVE CEROPEGIA DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. an der Bayreuther Graduiertenschule für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften (BayNAT) der Universität Bayreuth vorgelegt von Annemarie Heiduk Bayreuth, Januar 2017 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Zeit von Februar 2012 bis Dezember 2016 in Bayreuth am Lehrstuhl Pflanzensystematik unter der Betreuung von Herrn Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Dötterl (Erst-Mentor) und Herrn PD Dr. Ulrich Meve (Zweit-Mentor) angefertigt. Gefördert wurde die Arbeit von Februar bis April 2012 durch den ‛Feuerwehrfond’ zur Doktorandenförderung der Universität Bayreuth, von Mai 2012 bis April 2015 durch ein Stipendium nach dem Bayerischen Eliteförderungsgesetzt (BayEFG), und von Mai bis Juli 2015 durch ein Stipendium des Bayerischen Programms zur Förderung der Chancengleichheit für Frauen in Forschung und Lehre. Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Bayreuther Graduiertenschule für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften (BayNAT) der Universität Bayreuth genehmigten Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.). Dissertation eingereicht am: 02.02.2017 Zulassung durch das Leitungsgremium: 10.02.2017 Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium: 31.05.2017 Amtierender Direktor: Prof. Dr. Stephan Kümmel Prüfungsausschuss: Prof. Dr. Stefan Dötterl (Erstgutachter) Prof. Dr. Konrad Dettner (Zweitgutachter) Prof. Dr. Heike Feldhaar (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Bettina Engelbrecht Declaration of self-contribution This dissertation is submitted as a “Cumulative Thesis“ and contains a general synopsis (Part I) and three manuscripts (Part II) about the chemical ecology and pollination biology of Ceropegia . The major part of the research presented here was accomplished by myself under supervision of Univ.-Prof. Dr. Stefan Dötterl (Universities of Bayreuth and Salzburg) and PD Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia
    NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 4, No. 3, April, 1980 Registered for posting as a publication Category B. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Dr P.E. Hornsby SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 8 Kinross Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue LOWER MITCHAM SA 5062 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr J.R. Simmons COMMITTFE: Mrs A.M. Howe Mr K.W. Western TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mr R. Shooter Mr G. Nieuwenhoven EDITOR: Mr L.T. Nesbitt NEXT MEETING When: Tuesday, 22 April, 1980, at 6,00 p.m. Where St. Matthews Hall, Bridge Street, Kensington. Why: Slide programme from Phil Collin and Lloyd Bradford of the Australian Native Orchid Society in New South Wales. Plant display and commentaries, library, raffle and trading table. LAST MEETING Attendance 55 Five members brought along slides for us to view. The highlights were orchids flowering in the Yundi swamps and the rare Thelymitras seen in flower last season. Raffle prizes were Pterostylis nutans and a bottle of Nitrophoska Ron Robjohns commented on the epiphytes on display and Les Nesbitt spoke on the terrestrials. Plants seen Sarcochilus ceciliae (3F) Prasophyllum rufum (2) Dendrobium bigibbum P. nigricans Den. dicuphum Pterostylis baptistii (in bud) Den. cucumerinum Pt. curta (leaves only) Liparis reflexa Pt. revoluta Bulbophyllum exiguum Pt. obtusa (in bud) Eriochilus cucullatus (in bud) 2 POPULAR VOTE Terrestrials: First — Pterostylis revoluta Alwin Clements Second — Pterostylis revoluta Ray Hasse Epiphytes: First — Liparis reflexa Ray Haese equal - Sarcochilus ceciliae P.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Orchid Society Newsletter
    The Atlanta Affiliated with the American Orchid Orchid Society, the Orchid Digest Corporation and the Mid-America Orchid Congress. Society 2001 Recipient of the American Orchid Society’s Distinguished Affiliated Bulletin Societies Service Award Newsletter Editor: Danny Lentz Volume 47: Number 5 www.atlantaorchidsociety.org May 2006 MAY EVENTS The Meeting: 8:00 Monday, May 8 at Atlanta Botanical Garden Greg Allikas, Orchid Photography Greg Allikas has been a commercial photographer in the Palm Beaches and an orchid grower since 1970. He is awards photographer for the AOS West Palm Beach Judging Center, Florida-Caribbean Judging Center in Miami, and many annual south Florida orchid shows. His photos are regularly seen in numerous AOS publications including the annual calendar and the Awards Quarterly and Orchids magazine. He has written articles for both Orchids magazine and Orchid Digest. Two books (“Orchids”, “The World’s Most Beautiful Orchids”) co- authored with Ned Nash feature many of his photos. Greg also has many photos in the latest editions of the Sunset and Ortho books on orchids. In early 2005 he was honored to consult on, and supply photography for a United Nations postal administration endangered species stamp release featuring 12 endangered orchid species. Greg’s web site is www.orchidworks.com AtlOS members can bring plants to sell at the May meeting. Please remember that 10% of sales should be donated to the society. Greengrowers: Henry Everett on Sunday May 28, starting at 2:00 Former Atlanta Orchid Society member (and past-president) Henry Everett has invited us to visit his home this month and see how he grows his orchids.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Communication
    395 SHORT COMMUNICATION Range extensions and conservation status of 18 restricted plant species in north-eastern New South Wales Lachlan M. Copeland1 and John T. Hunter2 1Division of Botany, University of New England, Armidale, 2351. 275 Kendall Rd., Invergowrie, 2350. Introduction During recent surveys within north-eastern New South Wales new records of range extensions for some significant plant taxa were recorded. The implications for the conservation status of each taxon in terms of their ROTAP status (Briggs & Leigh 1996) are discussed. It is important that management decisions concerning rare taxa are made using the most up-to-date information possible, hence the need to report new distributions and suggest changes in conservation status. Vouchers of all taxa discussed have been lodged at the NCW Beadle Herbarium at the Division of Botany, University of New England and/or at the Herbarium of the North Coast Regional Botanic Garden, Coffs Harbour. In the following notes National Park is abbreviated to NP and Nature Reserve to NR. 1. Acacia barringtonensis Tindale (family Fabaceae) Previously believed to be restricted to a few disjunct localities in the Barrington Tops, Backwater, Boonoo Boonoo and Gibraltar Range areas but recently discovered in the east of Oxley Wild Rivers NP and in Carrai NP (P. Richards pers. comm. 1997), and along the Racecourse Trail in Werrikimbe NP (Copeland 1999). The current ROTAP code, 3RCa (Briggs & Leigh 1996) is considered adequate. 2. Acacia macnuttiana Maiden & Blakely (family Fabaceae) Previously recorded from Pindari Dam area near Ashford (North Western Slopes) to Boonoo Boonoo Falls (Northern Tablelands). Populations are known from Boonoo Boonoo NP and the Torrington State Recreation Area (Clarke et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Diversity: an Evolutionary Consequence of Deception?
    Opinion TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution Vol.20 No.9 September 2005 Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Salvatore Cozzolino1 and Alex Widmer2 1Dipartimento delle Scienze Biologiche, Universita` degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Foria 223, I-80139 Naples, Italy 2Geobotanisches Institut, ETH Zu¨ rich, Zollikerstr. 107, CH-8008 Zu¨ rich, Switzerland The Orchidaceae are one of the most species-rich plant female) [7], suggesting that pollination by deceit in orchids families and their floral diversity and pollination biology is an evolutionarily highly successful strategy. have long intrigued evolutionary biologists. About one- Numerous theories have been proposed to explain the third of the estimated 18 500 species are thought to be evolution of deception in orchids and these theories have pollinated by deceit. To date, the focus has been on how been widely discussed [8]. It is currently an open question such pollination evolved, how the different types of as to when pollination by deceit evolved in orchids. deception work, and how it is maintained, but little Phylogenetic evidence suggests that deceit pollination is progress has been made in understanding its evolution- either ancestral in orchids, or evolved early in their ary consequences. To address this issue, we discuss evolutionary history (Box 2). This inference is supported here how deception affects orchid mating systems, the by the observation that numerous mechanisms are found evolution of reproductive isolation, speciation processes throughout the Orchidaceae to promote pollination and neutral genetic divergence among species. We success under conditions of pollinator limitation, as is argue that pollination by deceit is one of the keys to typically observed in deceptive orchids, including extreme orchid floral and species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses of Drakaeinae: Diurideae (Orchidaceae) Based on DNA Sequences of the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2014, 27,3–22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SB13036 Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Drakaeinae: Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region Joseph T. Miller A,C and Mark A. Clements A,B ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BAustralian National Botanic Gardens, GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Results of the analysis of rDNA sequences based on 55 collections representative of 32 Drakaeinae orchid species and outgroups supported the monophyly of the subtribe, with weak support for the inclusion of Spiculaea, and revealed six strongly supported monophyletic, well defined morphological groups. Caleana is monophyletic. Chiloglottis s.lat. is monophyletic when Simpliglottis and Myrmechila are included. Our results also suggested that the segregate genus Phoringopsis is better treated as part of Arthrochilus.There is sufficient molecular and morphological support for recognition of the leafless, mycroheterotrophic Thynninorchis to be maintained as a separate genus. A taxonomic summary is provided, including reassignment of taxa at generic ranks and new combinations for Caleana alcockii (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana brockmanii (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana disjuncta (D.L.Jones) M.A.Clem., Caleana dixonii (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana gracilicordata (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana granitica (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana hortiorum (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana lyonsii (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana parvula (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem., Caleana terminalis (Hopper & A.P.Br.) M.A.Clem.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of Orchids
    American Journal of Botany 86(2): 208±224. 1999. A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE ORCHIDACEAE: EVIDENCE FROM RBCL NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES1 KENNETH M. CAMERON,2,9 MARK W. C HASE,3 W. M ARK WHITTEN,4 PAUL J. KORES,3,10 DAVID C. JARRELL,5 VICTOR A. ALBERT,2 TOMOHISA YUKAWA,6 HAROLD G. HILLS,7 AND DOUGLAS H. GOLDMAN8 2The Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics Studies, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458-5126; 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, United Kingdom; 4Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-2009; 5Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312; 6Tsukuba Botanical Garden, National Science Museum, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan; 7DNA Sequencing Facility, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50014-3260; and 8Department of Botany, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 Cladistic parsimony analyses of rbcL nucleotide sequence data from 171 taxa representing nearly all tribes and subtribes of Orchidaceae are presented here. These analyses divide the family into ®ve primary monophyletic clades: apostasioid, cypripedioid, vanilloid, orchidoid, and epidendroid orchids, arranged in that order. These clades, with the exception of the vanilloids, essentially correspond to currently recognized subfamilies. A distinct subfamily, based upon tribe Vanilleae, is supported for Vanilla and its allies. The general tree topology is, for the most part, congruent with previously published hypotheses of intrafamilial relationships; however, there is no evidence supporting the previously recognized subfamilies Spiranthoideae, Neottioideae, or Vandoideae. Subfamily Spiranthoideae is embedded within a single clade containing mem- bers of Orchidoideae and sister to tribe Diurideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Muelleria Layout Vol16 2002 13/12/02 12:32 PM Page 81
    Muelleria layout Vol16 2002 13/12/02 12:32 PM Page 81 Muelleria 16: 81–82 (2002) Some new combinations and a new hybrid genus in Orchidaceae: Diurideae, for eastern Australia Jeffrey A. Jeanes National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141. [email protected] Abstract New combinations and a new hybrid genus are created for the Orchidaceae tribe Diurideae in east- ern Australia. The following new combinations are made in Arachnorchis D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. and Simpliglottis Szlachetko — Arachnorchis ×variabilis (Nicholls) Jeanes, Simpliglottis gramma- ta (G.W.Carr) Jeanes, Simpliglottis jeanesii (D.L.Jones) Jeanes and Simpliglottis triceratops (D.L.Jones) Jeanes. The following new hybrid genus is created followed by a new combination within that genus — ×Chilosimpliglottis Jeanes, ×Chilosimpliglottis pescottiana (R.S.Rogers) Jeanes. Introduction The past couple of years have seen a flurry of activity in the reclassification of parts of the primarily Australian orchid tribe Diurideae (Hopper & Brown 2000, 2001a, 2001b; Jones et al. 2001; Szlachetko 2001a, 2001b; Jones et al. 2002). These various works have given rise to conflicting classifications at the generic and subgeneric levels as well as the publication of many invalid names. Furthermore, the authors have overlooked several taxa and hence some of the necessary combinations have not been made into these new taxonomic systems. The opportunity is here taken to create the necessary new combina- tions at the generic level for those taxa occurring in eastern Australia. The creation of these new combinations will benefit flora writers, compilers of flora lists and land man- agement authorities who often work within a legislative framework that demands validly published binomials for the taxa with which they deal.
    [Show full text]