2005 Greenway Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2005 Greenway Plan With With Linkages Through: Ayden Bethel Bethel Farmville Grifton Simpson Winterville Prepared For The Citizens Of Pitt County By The Pitt County Planning Department In Collaboration With The East Carolina University Planning Program Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan PITT COUNTY GREENWAY PLAN 2025 Recommended for Adoption by the Grifton Board of Commissioners December 7, 2005 Pitt County Board of Commissioners Recommended for Adoption Jimmy Garris, Chair by the Ayden Beth B. Ward, Vice-Chair Board of Commissioners Glenn Bowen December 12, 2005 Tom Coulson David Hammomd Recommended for Adoption Eugene James by the Winterville Melvin McLawhorn Board of Aldermen John Minges December 12, 2005 Mark W. Owens. Jr. Recommended for Adoption Pitt County Planning Board by the Farmville Lyman Hardee, Chair Board of Commissioners Benjamin Forrest, Vice-Chair January 3, 2006 Don Baker Jane Barnhill Recommended for Adoption William Chapman by the Village of Simpson Larry Dilda Council David Harris January 9, 2005 George Hines Jimmy Hughes Recommended for Adoption Steve Little by the Bethel Ron Price Board of Commissioners February 7, 2006 Ayden Board of Commissioners Bethel Board of Commissioners Recommended for Adoption by the Pitt County Planning Board Farmville Board of Commissioners January 18, 2006 Grifton Board of Commissioners Adopted by the Pitt County Board of Commissioners Village Of Simpson Council February 20, 2006 Winterville Board of Aldermen Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan 2 Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan Table of Contents I. Executive Summary Appendix A: Statistical Summary of Proposed Greenways II. Introduction a. What are Greenways? Appendix B: Maps b. Benefits of Greenways Map 1 – Overview of Pitt County Greenways i. Health and Recreation Benefits Map 2 - Town of Ayden ii. Flood Control Benefits Map 3 - Town of Bethel iii. Water Quality Benefits Map 4 - Town of Falkland iv. Economic Benefits Map 5 - Town of Farmville v. Plant and Animal Habitat Benefits Map 6 - Town of Grifton vi. Safety Benefits Map 7 - Town of Simpson vii. Education Benefits Map 8 - Town of Winterville viii. Transportation Benefits Map 9 - Briery Creek and Tranters Creek Area c. Trends Influencing Greenway Planning and Map 10 - Chicod Creek Area Development Map 11 - Conetoe Creek Area Map 12 - Contentnea Creek Area III. Vision, Goals, and Objectives Map 13 - East Tar River Area a. The Vision b. Goals and Objectives Appendix C: Funding Sources for Greenway Trails IV. Greenway Trail Design and Development a. Greenway System Components Appendix D: Description of Pitt County i. Greenway Corridors a. Geographic Description ii. Greenway Trails b. Drainage Basins iii. Greenway Destinations c. Climate iv. Greenway Connectors d. Ecological Resources b. Greenway Trail Types and Design e. Historic and Cultural Resources c. Proposed Greenway Development Estimates f. Hazard History and Concerns For Mitigation V. Operational Policies and Procedures g. Socio-Demographics a. Land Acquisition h. Existing Greenway Systems and Related i. Management Plans ii. Regulation iii. Acquisition Appendix E: Policies and Regulations b. Greenway Management i. Land Management Affecting the Plan ii. Maintenance iii. Liability Appendix F: Citizen Involvement iv. Safety and Security a. Public Input b. Identifying Stakeholders VI. Plan Recommendations a. Land Acquisition Recommendations Appendix G: Glossary b. Financing Recommendations c. General Recommendations Appendix H: Acknowledgements Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan 3 Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan I. Executive Summary The State of North Carolina and Pitt County are continuing to experience rapid growth in population and development that began over the last decade. By 2020, Pitt County’s current population of 133,798 is projected to increase by 53,000 to about 186,000. In some parts of North Carolina, the percentage of urbanized land has increased several times faster than population growth. The number of farms in North Carolina has also drastically reduced over the last twenty five years. Between 1992 and 1997, rural land in the state was developed at a rate of 18 acres per hour according to the Natural Resources Conservation Service. North Carolina ranked fifth in the nation in the number of acres converted (781,600 acres) over this time period. As North Carolina and Pitt County grow, the landscape becomes more fragmented, the amount of available land decreases and the cost of land increases. The need to protect and preserve green and open space literally becomes more urgent every day. Greenways are linear corridors of open space and land that are either natural, such as along rivers and streams, or human-made, such as abandoned railways and utility corridors. Greenway corridors can range from undeveloped areas of land to areas that include paved or unpaved trails. They can provide vegetated buffers to protect natural habitat, improve water quality and reduce the impacts of flooding in high-risk areas. They allow public access for recreation or bicycle and pedestrian transportation, nature trails, horse riding trails or large areas of preserved natural habitat. Greenways offer a pleasant, healthy and safe alternative for driving to local schools, parks, libraries, stores or other places that people visit on a regular basis and improve the overall quality of life in an area. Community character and quality of life are important assets for our communities to help them attract appropriate development in the future. The manner in which the communities in Pitt County manage growth will fundamentally affect their economic competitiveness and their long-term quality of life for years to come. The creation of a greenway system is a complex task that involves many different groups and individuals, therefore, it is imperative to build broad community support for the plan, prioritize areas for implementation, and employ creative and innovative methods of funding and creating the greenways. The development and implementation of a greenway plan is an ambitious endeavor that may require a very long term commitment (up to 20 years or more) by the County and its citizens. It is also understood that property owners must share a willingness to locate a greenway or trail on or near their property for successful development of the Greenway Plan. The Pitt County Greenway Plan is intended to serve as a guide for the establishment of a countywide network of greenways and trails. It will also support County efforts to achieve other goals in maintaining the natural environment, wetland preservation, and floodplain protection in the county. This proposed plan will also help to link people to the County’s natural, recreational, cultural and commercial resources by connecting the waterways, open spaces and sensitive areas of the county with the existing recreation and greenway plans of regional and local governments and organizations. The Pitt County Comprehensive Land Use Plan of 2002 included a goal for the establishment of greenways in the County and provided the impetus for the development of this Plan. This Plan also serves to expand the City of Greenville’s existing greenway system and proposes extensions from the corridors cited in the 2004 Greenville Greenway Plan. This plan is the first greenway plan for Pitt County and it recommends the consideration of approximately 215 linear miles of greenway network primarily along some of the major, critical streams and rivers in the County. Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan 4 Pitt County 2005 Greenway Plan The proposed greenways in this plan consist of approximately 155 linear miles within unincorporated areas of the County, approximately 45 linear miles within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of county municipalities, and an additional 14 linear miles within city limits of county municipalities. Approximately fifty-five percent (117 miles) of proposed greenways would be designated primarily as recreation; forty-two percent (90 miles) of proposed greenways would be intended to serve primarily as conservation corridors, while the remaining three percent (8 miles) would consist of primarily sidewalk connectors in urban areas. An important aspect of this plan is the potential utilization of the travel-ways that parallel the extensive system of drainage laterals within the County. The drainage laterals are the dredged and channelized segments of the major stream systems in the county. Almost forty-four percent (51 miles) of proposed recreation greenways in this plan are based on drainage laterals that are virtually ready for conversion to use as greenways and would require relatively minimal costs to develop a bare earth or stabilized trail surface at approximately $3,000/mile to develop. Greenways and trails are acquired and constructed to serve a public conservation, recreation or transportation purpose. Therefore, the owner and manager of most of the trails and greenways in Pitt County would be under the jurisdiction of the respective municipalities and local governments within the County. Local governments may obtain their property for trails and greenways by various methods. Each method varies in terms of the transferring process; such as land use management, land use regulation, and land acquisition. There are also some financial incentives in the form of tax credits for land owners who donate land or easements. The most successful method of funding greenways is to combine private sector funds with funds from local, state, and federal sources. Many communities involved with greenway implementation will
Recommended publications
  • Mitigation Plan
    Little Contentnea Creek Riparian Buffer Restoration – Phase 3 Greene County, North Carolina MITIGATION PLAN December, 2005 GES Greene Environmental Services, LLC 90 Ham Produce Road Snow Hill, NC 28580 EEP contract 005020 Greene Environmental Services, LLC 90 Ham Produce Road, Snow Hill, NC 28580 (252) 747-8200 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Methods.................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Site preparation.............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Implementation.............................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Success Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 Monitoring................................................................................................................................ 6 5.0 Mitigation ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pitt County Genealogical Quarterly [Serial]
    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL THE COLLECTION OF NORTH CAROLINIANA C971.74 P68g Vol. 16-17 2009-2010 UNIVERSITY OF N.C. AT CHAPEL HILL 00040626153 FOR USE ONLY IN THE NORTH CAROLINA COLLECTION UNCPS 51499 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/pittcountygeneal16pitt 1 . Pitt County Genealogical Quarterly OQl Volume XVI, No. 1 February 2009 Pitt County Genealogical Quarterly Pitt County Family Researchers, Inc. P. O. Box 2608, Greenville, NC 27836 Officers 2009 President Roger Kammerer 1 1 15 Ragsdale Road, Greenville, NC 27858-3920 (252-758-6882) email [email protected]) Vice President Frank D. Barrow, Sr. 1366 Forest Acres Drive, Greenville, NC 27834-6655 (252-752-5345) email ([email protected]) Secretary (office vacant) Treasurer Sue Butler 439 W. Hanrahan Road, Grifton, NC 28530 (252-746-6064) Executive Board Robin Nichols 281 1 Bell Arthur Road, Greenville, NC 27834 (252-355-8084) email ([email protected]) Executive Board. William L. Cox 6441 Boss McLawhorn Road, Grifton, NC 28530-8714 email ([email protected]) Executive Board Judy Nobles Lewis 5245 County Home Road, Winterville, NC 28590-7834 (252-756-7196) email ([email protected]) PCGQ Editor Roger Kammerer 1 1 15 Ragsdale Road, Greenville, NC 27858-3920 (252-758-6882) email [email protected]) Pitt County Family Researchers, Inc., was established in November 1994 as a non-profit organization. Our purpose is to establish a network to aid persons researching family origins in Pitt County and its neighboring counties. Our Quarterly subscription fee is $30.00; subscriptions run concurrently from January 1 to December 31.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Billing Code 9110-12-P DEPARTMENT OF
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/12/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-03077, and on FDsys.gov 1 Billing Code 9110-12-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 67 Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002 Final Flood Elevation Determinations AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified BFEs are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing BFEs and modified BFEs for each community. This date may be obtained by contacting the office where the maps are available for inspection as indicated in the table below. ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each community are available for inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or (e-mail) [email protected]. 2 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the modified BFEs for each community listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Properties of the Surficial Aquifer at Five Selected Sites in the Little Contentnea Creek Basin, North Carolina, 2002–03
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Hydraulic Properties of the Surficial Aquifer at Five Selected Sites in the Little Contentnea Creek Basin, North Carolina, 2002–03 Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5238 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Truck-mounted drill rig used to install wells at aquifer-test sites in the Little Contentnea Creek basin, North Carolina. Hydraulic Properties of the Surficial Aquifer at Five Selected Sites in the Little Contentnea Creek Basin, North Carolina, 2002–03 By Douglas G. Smith and Melinda J. Chapman Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5238 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry and Characteristics of Nitrogen Transport at a Confined
    science for a changing world Prepared in cooperation with the National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Groundwater section Geochemistry and Characteristics of Nitrogen Transport at a Confined Animal Feeding Operation in a Coastal Plain Agricultural Watershed, and Implications for Nutrient Loading in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, 1999-2002 Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5283 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photographs. Left: Sandy Run near the Lizzie Research Station, Greene County, North Carolina. Right: Ground-water sampling site L18 at the Lizzie Research Station. Geochemistry and Characteristics of Nitrogen Transport at a Confined Animal Feeding Operation in a Coastal Plain Agricultural Watershed, and Implications for Nutrient Loading in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, 1999 –2002 By T.B. Spruill, A.J. Tesoriero, H.E. Mew, Jr., K.M. Farrell, S.L. Harden, A.B. Colosimo, and S.R. Kraemer Prepared in cooperation with the National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Groundwater Section Scientific Investigations Report 2004 – 5283 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geology and Shallow Aquifer System of the Little Contentnea Creek Watershed, Neuse River Basin, North Carolina
    Surficial geology and shallow aquifer system of the Little Contentnea Creek Watershed, Neuse River Basin, North Carolina 10 km Carolina Geological Society Annual Field Trip November 14–16, 2003 Guidebook Editors: Kathleen M. Farrell and Amy J. Keyworth Contributors (in reverse alphabetical order) Anthony J. Tesoriero, Timothy B. Spruill, Douglas G. Smith, H.E.Mew, Jr., Stephen R. Kraemer, Amy J. Keyworth, Steve L. Harden, Kathleen M. Farrell, and Timothy W. Clark Acknowledgments and Credits John Warlick, Martin Marietta Aggregates, Fountain, NC John Stevens, Martin Marietta Materials, Raleigh, NC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant Program James D. Simons Director, Division of Land Resources and State Geologist North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC-DENR) Carl Bailey NC-DENR, Division of Water Quality, Groundwater Section Tonya Merritt, North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS-DENR) Phil Bradley, Amy Ward, Cindy Phillips (NCGS-DENR) Sponsorship of CGS-2003 (received prior to printing) by: Martin Marietta Materials 2710 Wycliff Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-3033 Vulcan Materials Company Mideast Division 4513 Creedmore Rd Raleigh, NC 27612 Patterson Exploration Services P.O. Box 3008 Sanford, NC 27331 919-744-3770 [email protected] Cover Figure: Lidar map of the Little Contentnea Creek Watershed. (Created by Amy J. Keyworth) Layout by Amy J. Keyworth Surficial geology and shallow aquifer system of the Little Contentnea Creek Watershed, Neuse River Basin, North Carolina Carolina Geological Society Annual Field Trip November 14–16, 2003 Guidebook Editors: Kathleen M. Farrell and Amy J. Keyworth Collaborators (in reverse alphabetical order): H.E.
    [Show full text]