Notes on the Butterflies of North Carolina, 27Th Approximation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes on the Butterflies of North Carolina, 27Th Approximation BUTTERFLIES OF NORTH CAROLINA Twenty-seventh Approximation Compiled by Harry E. LeGrand, Jr. Graphics by Thomas E. Howard, Jr. March 2020 The enclosed material is an accounting of the species of butterflies of North Carolina, updated annually for the past 26 years. It is not considered to be a “publication”. It is intended to be a guide or “handbook” for butterfly watchers and others interested in butterflies, as there is, as yet, no published book on the butterflies of North Carolina. The county maps for each species represent a mix of specimens, photographs, and unconfirmed sight records. We have taken an unpublished set of county distribution maps for each species in the Carolinas, compiled by Jeff Nekola and Paul Opler in the 1980's, and added records from the past 26 years from many sources, mainly sight records, such that the reader cannot tell which county records refer to specimens or to sightings only. They include records known to the NC Natural Heritage Program and the NC Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) through the end of 2019. The maps are certainly not complete. However, they should give the reader a general feel for the range of a species in the Carolinas. The vast majority of the over 196,995 records (from North Carolina) were entered by me (from e-mails and other correspondence) on computer from 1995-2019, and the remaining several thousand records were entered by DPR biologists into their agency's natural resources database. Tom Howard has formatted the butterfly data into the county dot maps and flight charts portrayed in the pdf version of this approximation. A feature starting with the 15th approximation is the splitting out of North Carolina county dots into those that are reasonably recent (solid dot), versus those with the last date either prior to 1980 or not known to us (open dot). This feature should show the reader the species, or portions of their ranges, that are clearly in decline. The South Carolina dot map is primarily that as taken from the Nekola - Opler atlas, but we have been adding new county records from that state in recent years with contributions from Dennis Forsythe and Brian Scholtens. Thus, the dot maps for South Carolina are becoming more “complete” than they were previously, but they are still somewhat below those from North Carolina in terms of thoroughness. Because there are now nearly 200,000 records in the database, we feel that the range maps and flight charts are fairly concise for most species in North Carolina. The species are arranged in taxonomic order following Pelham (2020), with the exception that the true butterflies on this website are placed before the skippers. The scientific names also are those used in that reference, with one exception noted on the species account. The common names are taken from the Checklist of North American Butterflies Occurring North of Mexico - Edition 2.3 (North American Butterfly Association 2016), as well as some used on the Butterflies of America (2020) website, with a few exceptions noted in the species accounts. Other common and scientific names are listed beneath the county maps. Information about the life history — based mostly on my field experience — is given for each of the 177 species found in North Carolina. However, the material on food plants is not based on my experience, but on a number of references; Opler and Krizek (1984), Heitzman and Heitzman (1987), Opler and Malikul (1992), and Allen (1997) were the chief sources. Also included in this PDF manuscript is a set of flight date charts (histograms) for each species for each of the three physiographic provinces (Mountains, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain) in North Carolina. One purpose of this document is to encourage the reporting of sightings or other records of rare species to the NC Natural Heritage Program. They keep computerized records on these rare species, in hopes of arranging protection for them. Rare species are noted under the “Status and Rank” beneath the map; see Page v of this document for rarity codes. Rare species are also denoted in the Table of Contents (Pages i - iv). This is the first approximation where the website editor is recommending statuses and ranks not currently in use by the NC Natural Heritage Program or NatureServe; these suggested changes are in brackets following the status or rank. You should note, in looking at range maps in field guides, that a number of butterflies are found very close to the North Carolina border, but which have yet to be found in the state (see Appendix A). This is particularly true in the mountains of Virginia, and another butterfly has been found on the Virginia side of the Dismal Swamp but has yet to be reported (to my knowledge) from North Carolina. Sadly, most of these Virginia species have not been seen since before 1950. Of the five species of butterflies found in South Carolina but not in North Carolina (see Appendix A), the Eastern Pygmy-Blue and the Bell’s Roadside-Skipper are each resident species that have been recorded in counties adjacent to North Carolina but still have yet to be found in our state. (South Carolina also has a record for European Peacock, but we feel that this represents an escape and thus is not included in Appendix A.) Thus, it is more likely that new species to North Carolina will be current residents in South Carolina or strays from farther south or west. In summary, we need more investigative field work in North Carolina, especially in the mountains and in the southeastern corner of the Coastal Plain. If you have not already done so, we would encourage you to join the North American Butterfly Association, which began in 1993. It publishes American Butterflies, a quarterly journal on the watching of and conservation of butterflies in North America. Of course, also make sure that you have joined the Carolina Butterfly Society, which began in 1995. In this document, we make mention of a handful of references. We strongly urge you to have a butterfly guide that contains both range maps and color photos of living butterflies. Glassberg’s Butterflies through Binoculars: The East was published in 1999; this is the single best guide for butterfliers to obtain in the Carolinas, as it contains color range maps and color photos, plus excellent text containing key field marks, for all Eastern species. The Brock and Kaufman (2003) guide treats all butterflies of the United States and Canada. It contains color digital photos of all species, with text and range maps on facing pages. This is another “must” to have. Pyle has color photos of both eastern and western butterflies, but no range maps, whereas Opler and Malikul contains black-and-white range maps but few photos. Scott, Shull, and Heitzman and Heitzman have good color photographs of specimens. Allen also has color photos of specimens (of adults), plus excellent color photos of living caterpillars on their hostplants. Cech and Tudor (2005) contains color photographs of all NC species, as well as range maps and excellent text on habitat, life history, and other interesting facts about each species. A fairly new guide by Glassberg, revised in 2017, contains color photos of all butterfly species of North America, including species occurring in adjacent Mexico. Though the text is sparse, there are range maps for all species. These, and other uncited references used in this compilation, are listed below. • SUGGESTED REFERENCES • Allen, T.J. 1997. The Butterflies of West Virginia and Their Caterpillars. University of Pittsburgh Press, PA Allen, T.J., J.P. Brock, and J. Glassberg. 2005. Caterpillars in the Field and Garden: A Field Guide to the Butterfly Caterpillars of North America. Oxford University Press, New York. Brimley, C.S. 1938. The Insects of North Carolina. N.C. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, Raleigh. Brock, J.P., and K. Kaufman. 2003. Butterflies of North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York. Cech, R., and G. Tudor. 2005. Butterflies of the East Coast: An Observer’s Guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Daniels, J.C. 2003. Butterflies of the Carolinas – Field Guide. Adventure Publications, Inc., Cambridge, MN. Emmitt, R. 2005. Butterflies of the Carolinas & Virginias: Interactive CD. [Note - privately published by Randy] Glassberg, J. 1993. Butterflies through Binoculars. Oxford University Press, New York. (now out of print) Glassberg, J. 1999. Butterflies through Binoculars: The East. Oxford University Press, New York. Glassberg, J. 2017. A Swift Guide to Butterflies of North America; Second Edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Glassberg, J., M.C. Minno, and J.V. Calhoun. 2000. Butterflies through Binoculars: Florida. Oxford University Press, New York. Gochfeld, M., and J. Burger. 1997. Butterflies of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. Harris, L., Jr. 1972. Butterflies of Georgia. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Heitzman, J.R., and J.E. Heitzman. 1987. Butterflies and Moths of Missouri. Missouri Dept. of Conservation. Howell, W.M., and V. Charny. 2010. Butterflies of Alabama. Pearson Custom Publishing. Iftner, D.C., J.A. Shuey, and J.V. Calhoun. 1992. Butterflies and Skippers of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin New Series. Vol. 9, Number 1. Klots, A.B. 1951. A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. Marks, C. 2018. Butterflies of Louisiana: A Guide to Identification and Location. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge. Monroe, J.L., and D.M. Wright. 2017. Butterflies of Pennsylvania: a Field Guide. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. Nielsen, M.C. 1999. Michigan Butterflies and Skippers: A Field Guide and Reference. Michigan State University Cooperative. North American Butterfly Association.
Recommended publications
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch Butterflies and Their Habitat Across North America
    Monitoring Monarch Butterflies and Their Habitat across North America Inventory and Monitoring Protocols and Data Standards for Monarch Conservation Please cite as: CEC. 2017. Monitoring Monarch Butteries and eir Habitat across North America: Inventory and Monitoring Protocols and Data Standards for Monarch Conservation. Montreal, Canada: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 48 pp. is publication was prepared by Holly Holt of Monarch Joint Venture (University of Minnesota) for the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. e information contained herein is the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily reect the views of [the CEC, or] the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-prot purposes may be made without special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. e CEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Except where otherwise noted, this work is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial–NoDerivative Works License. © Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2017 ISBN: 978-2-89700-221-3 (e-version) Disponible en français – ISBN: 978-2-89700-223-7 (e-version) Disponible en español – ISBN: 978-2-89700-222-0 (e-version) Legal deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2017 Legal deposit – Library and Archives Canada, 2017 Publication Details Document category:
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Neotropical Butterfly Genus Anartia
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26 (2003) 46–55 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A molecular phylogeny of the neotropical butterfly genus Anartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Michael J. Blum,a,b,* Eldredge Bermingham,b and Kanchon Dasmahapatrab,c a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Island Molecular Laboratories, Unit 0948, APO-AA 34002-0948, Panama, FL, USA c Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, University College, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK Received 2 August 2001; received in revised form 17 June 2002 Abstract While Anartia butterflies have served as model organisms for research on the genetics of speciation, no phylogeny has been published to describe interspecific relationships. Here, we present a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Anartia species relationships, using both mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Analyses of both data sets confirm earlier predictions of sister species pairings based primarily on genital morphology. Yet both the mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies demonstrate that Anartia jatrophae is not sister to all other Anartia species, but rather that it is sister to the Anartia fatima–Anartia amathea lineage. Traditional bi- ogeographic explanations for speciation across the genus relied on A. jatrophae being sister to its congeners. These explanations invoked allopatric divergence of sister species pairs and multiple sympatric speciation events to explain why A. jatrophae flies alongside all its congeners. The molecular phylogenies are more consistent with lineage divergence due to vicariance, and range expansion of A. jatrophae to explain its sympatry with congeners. Further interpretations of the tree topologies also suggest how morphological evolution and eco-geographic adaptation may have set species range boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Gardening Tips & Tricks Gardening for Butterflies Is Fun, Beautiful, and Good for the Environment
    Butterfly Gardening Tips & Tricks Gardening for butterflies is fun, beautiful, and good for the environment. It is also simple and can be done in almost any location. The key guidelines are listed below: NO PESTICIDES! Caterpillars are highly susceptible to almost all pesticides so keep them away from your yard if you want butterflies to thrive. Select the right plants. You will need to provide nectar sources for adults and host plants for caterpillars. See the lists below for inspiration. Keep to native varieties as much as possible. Plants come in lots and lots of varieties and cultivars. When selecting plants, especially host plants, try to find native species as close to the natural or wild variety as possible. Provide shelter. Caterpillars need shelter from the sun and shelter from cold nights. Adults need places to roost during the night. And protected areas are needed for the chrysalis to safely undergo its transformation. The best way to provide shelter is with large clumps of tall grasses (native or ornamental) and medium to large evergreen trees and/or shrubs. Nectar Sources Top Ten Nectar Sources: Asclepias spp. (milkweed) Aster spp. Buddleia spp. (butterfly bush) Coreopsis spp. Echinacea spp. (coneflower) Eupatorium spp. (joe-pye weed) Lantana spp. Liatris spp. Pentas spp. Rudbeckia spp. (black-eyed susan) Others: Agastache spp. (hyssop), Apocynum spp. (dogbane), Ceanothus americanus (New Jersey tea), Cephalanthus occidentalis (button bush), Clethra alnifolia, Cuphea spp. (heather), Malus spp. (apple), Mentha spp. (mint), Phlox spp., Pycanthemum incanum (mountain mint), Salivs spp. (sage), Sedum spectabile (stonecrop), Stokesia laevis (cornflower), Taraxacum officinale (dandelion), Triofolium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Tanzania
    80 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY status. Also included on the species page is an occurrence calendar-graph for each stage of the species and a map of Ontario showing distribution by dots placed in each county and district of occurrence. I wish the authors had included more biological information and" characteristics" of each species instead of devoting more than half a page to each distribution map. The 12 color plates include 2 habitat photographs and 27 individual photographs that show 7 larvae and pupa and 20 adults, representing 22 species. Following the main species section is information on 19 stray species that have been vouchered by a single specimen (e.g., Erynnis zarucco) or rarely recorded (e.g., Speyeria idalia). It appears to me that these strays should have been included in the main species section, which already includes such strays as Pyrgus communis, Hylephila phyleus, Battus philenor, to name a few. Next is a section listing five unconfirmed species that may range into Ontario based on records from adjacent provinces and Michigan. This section might better have been called a hypothetical species list. The final species section has information on five doubtful species that have been erroneously referred to Ontario as a result of misidentification, improper labelling, or lack of a voucher specimen. The last four pages of the Atlas comprise a bibliography, including check-lists, TEA publications, and general works, and a provincial ranking of status indicating number of occurrences within the province. This publication is a valuable addition to the literature on Lepidoptera of the region from Hudson Bay to the Great Lakes, although there are a few questionable assertions.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminole State Forest Soils Map
    EXHIBIT I Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Lands Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Properties (revised February 2007) These procedures apply to state agencies, local governments, and non-profits that manage state- owned properties. A. General Discussion Historic resources are both archaeological sites and historic structures. Per Chapter 267, Florida Statutes, ‘Historic property’ or ‘historic resource’ means any prehistoric district, site, building, object, or other real or personal property of historical, architectural, or archaeological value, and folklife resources. These properties or resources may include, but are not limited to, monuments, memorials, Indian habitations, ceremonial sites, abandoned settlements, sunken or abandoned ships, engineering works, treasure trove, artifacts, or other objects with intrinsic historical or archaeological value, or any part thereof, relating to the history, government, and culture of the state.” B. Agency Responsibilities Per State Policy relative to historic properties, state agencies of the executive branch must allow the Division of Historical Resources (Division) the opportunity to comment on any undertakings, whether these undertakings directly involve the state agency, i.e., land management responsibilities, or the state agency has indirect jurisdiction, i.e. permitting authority, grants, etc. No state funds should be expended on the undertaking until the Division has the opportunity to review and comment on the project, permit, grant, etc. State agencies shall preserve the historic resources which are owned or controlled by the agency. Regarding proposed demolition or substantial alterations of historic properties, consultation with the Division must occur, and alternatives to demolition must be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Tennessee Alphabetical by Common Name Butterflies Of
    1 Butterflies of Tennessee Butterflies of Tennessee Alphabetical by Common Name Page 2 Butterflies of Tennessee Alphabetical by Scientific Name Page 6 Butterflies of Tennessee Alphabetical by Family Page 10 The Middle Tennessee Chapter of the North American Butterfly Association (NABA) maintains the list of Butterflies in Tennessee. Check their website at: nabamidtn.org/?page_id=176 Updated March 2015 1 2 Butterflies of Tennessee Alphabetical by Common Name Common Name Scientific Name Family American Copper Lycaena phlaeas Lycaenidae American Lady Vanessa virginiensis Nymphalidae American Snout Libytheana carinenta Nymphalidae Aphrodite Fritillary Speyeria aphrodite Nymphalidae Appalachian Azure Celestrina neglectamajor Lycaenidae Appalachian Brown Satyrodes appalachia Nymphalidae Appalachian Tiger Swallowtail Papilio appalachiensis Papilionidae Baltimore Checkerspot Euphydryas phaeton Nymphalidae Banded Hairstreak Satyrium calanus Lycaenidae Bell’s Roadside-Skipper Amblyscirtes belli Hesperiidae Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes Papilionidae Brazilian Skipper Calpodes ethlius Hesperiidae Broad-winged Skipper Poanes viator Hesperiidae Bronze Copper Lycaena hyllus Lycaenidae Brown Elfin Callophrys augustinus Lycaenidae Cabbage White Pieris rapae Pieridae Carolina Satyr Hermeuptychia sosybius Nymphalidae Checkered White Pontia protodice Pieridae Clouded Skipper Lerema accius Hesperiidae Clouded Sulphur Colias philodice Pieridae Cloudless Sulphur Phoebis sennae Pieridae Cobweb Skipper Hesperia metea Hesperiidae Common Buckeye Junonia coenia
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North Carolina - Twenty-Eighth Approximation 159
    Crystal Skipper Atrytonopsis quinteri 40 n=0 30 M N 20 u m 10 b e 0 r 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • o 40 • f n=0 = Sighting or Collection 30 P x• = Not seen nor collected F since 1980 l 20 i 5 records / 32 individuals added g 10 to 28th h 0 t 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 NC counties: 2 or 2% High counts of: 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 SC counties: 0 or 0% 414 - Carteret - 2019-04-14 D Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec a 40 100 - Carteret - 2001-05-02 t n=123 100 - Carteret - 2003-04-17 e 30 C s 20 10 Status and Rank Earliest date: Carteret 1 Apr 2008 State Global 0 Latest date: Carteret 31 Aug 2004 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 SR - S1 G1 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Synonym: Atrytonopsis hianna loammi, Atrytonopsis loammi, Atrytonopsis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Components of Core Habitat ­
    Chapter Three: Components of Core Habitat ­ Section A: Species of Conservation Concern BioMap2 includes areas delineated to capture the habitats specifically required for the long-term survival of 448 species of conservation concern. This group of species includes those listed under the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA; M.G.L. c131A) as well as additional species included in the Massachusetts State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP), and they include vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species. These species represent specific elements of the native biodiversity of Massachusetts that might not otherwise be captured through more coarse- filter conservation efforts. Except for tern foraging habitat and the broad habitats of the generalist Eastern Box Turtle, these species-specific habitat areas are included as Core Habitats within BioMap2. Tern foraging habitat (which includes extensive areas, mainly marine and salt marsh) and some Eastern Box Turtle habitat (based on the largest, highest quality habitat areas currently occupied by the Eastern Box Turtle) were included in Critical Natural Landscape. MESA-listed Species Mapping Species listed under the MESA are some of the most imperiled species in the state, as evidenced by their rarity, population trends, and vulnerability to outside threats. Beginning in 2004, for species listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern pursuant to MESA, biologists at NHESP with species-specific expertise delineated species-specific habitat areas based on records of observations of those species that are currently in the NHESP database (see Appendix I, Rare Species Observation Forms). These records were evaluated against several criteria for inclusion into the database, such as the expertise of the observer, the documentation provided to confirm identification (photos, description, specimens, etc.), appropriateness of habitat and time of year, whether it was observed within the known range for the species, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean
    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
    [Show full text]