Legislative Priorities Ban on Beach Hardening Under
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................................................. 5 I. Legislative Defendants Must Provide the Information Requested in the Second Set of Interrogatories ............................................................................................................. 5 II. In the Alternative, or if Legislative Defendants Do Not Provide The Home Addresses By March 1, the Court Should Bar Legislative Defendants From Defending the 2017 Plans on the Basis of Any Incumbency Theory................................. 7 III. The Court Should Award Fees and Expenses and Other Appropriate Relief ..................... 8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................................................. 11 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Cloer v. Smith , 132 N.C. App. 569, 512 S.E.2d 779 (1999)............................................................................ 7 F. E. Davis -
Good Government Fund Contributions to Candidates and Political Committees January 1 ‐ December 31, 2018
GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND POLITICAL COMMITTEES JANUARY 1 ‐ DECEMBER 31, 2018 STATE RECIPIENT OF GGF FUNDS AMOUNT DATE ELECTION OFFICE OR COMMITTEE TYPE CA Jeff Denham, Jeff PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC DC Association of American Railroads PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Trade Assn PAC FL Bill Nelson, Moving America Forward PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC GA David Perdue, One Georgia PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC GA Johnny Isakson, 21st Century Majority Fund Fed $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC MO Roy Blunt, ROYB Fund $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC NE Deb Fischer, Nebraska Sandhills PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC OR Peter Defazio, Progressive Americans for Democracy $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC SC Jim Clyburn, BRIDGE PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC SD John Thune, Heartland Values PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC US Dem Cong Camp Cmte (DCCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Natl Rep Cong Cmte (NRCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Dem Sen Camp Cmte (DSCC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct US Natl Rep Sen Cmte (NRSC) ‐ Federal Acct $15,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 National Party Cmte‐Fed Acct VA Mark Warner, Forward Together PAC $5,000 01/18/2018 N/A 2018 Federal Leadership PAC VA Tim Kaine, Common -
North Carolina Legislative Update, January 11, 2019
North Carolina Legislative Update, January 11, 2019 01.11.2019 State legislators returned to Raleigh this week to begin the 2019 session. This year’s session, which is called the “long session,” is expected to last through the summer as members enact a two-year budget and consider hundreds of bills. Republicans continue to hold majorities in both houses, but after the 2018 election, their majorities are no longer veto proof. They hold a 29-21 majority in the Senate and 65-55 in the House. A number of seats are held by newcomers—13 Senators and 26 Representatives. The chief business for opening day was election of leadership. Both chambers elected many of the same leaders as the past session. The Senate reelected Senator Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) as President Pro Tem and Senator Ralph Hise (R-Mitchell) as Deputy President Pro Tem. Senator Dan Blue (D-Wake) was reelected as Democratic leader. The House reelected Representative Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) as Speaker and Representative Sarah Stevens (R-Surry) as Speaker Pro Tem. Representative Darren Jackson (D-Wake) was reelected as Democratic leader. Senior Chairs of the House Appropriations Committee will be Representatives Jason Saine (R-Lincoln), Linda Johnson (R-Cabarrus), and Donny Lambeth (R-Forsyth). The Chairs of the House Finance Committee will be Representatives Julia Howard (R-Davie), Mitchell Setzer (R-Catawba), and John Szoka (R-Cumberland). Representative David Lewis (R-Harnett) will remain Chairman of the House Committee on Rules, Calendar and Operations of the House. Three Senators will continue to chair the Appropriations/Base Budget committee. -
Journal Senate 2015 General
JOURNAL OF THE SENATE OF THE 2015 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SECOND EXTRA SESSION 2016 OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF THE SENATE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA 2015 GENERAL ASSEMBLY SECOND EXTRA SESSION 2016 SENATE LEADERSHIP DANIEL J. FOREST, President ......................................................... Raleigh PHILIP E. BERGER, President Pro Tempore ........................................ Eden LOUIS M. PATE, JR., Deputy President Pro Tempore .............. Mount Olive DISTRICT NAME OF SENATOR RESIDENCE 1 WILLIAM COOK (R) ........................................... Chocowinity 2 NORMAN W. SANDERSON (R) ............................. Arapahoe 3 ERICA SMITH-INGRAM (D) ...................................... Gaston 4 ANGELA R. BRYANT (D) ................................. Rocky Mount 5 DONALD G. DAVIS (D) ......................................... Snow Hill 6 HARRY BROWN (R) ............................................ Jacksonville 7 LOUIS M. PATE, JR. (R) ..................................... Mount Olive 8 WILLIAM P. RABON (R)......................................... Southport 9 MICHAEL V. LEE (R) .......................................... Wilmington 10 BRENT JACKSON (R) ............................................ Autryville 11 E. S. “BUCK” NEWTON III (R) ................................... Wilson 12 RONALD J. RABIN (R) ........................................ Spring Lake 13 JANE W. SMITH (D) .............................................. Lumberton 14 DANIEL T. BLUE, JR. (D) .......................................... Raleigh 15 -
NAACP Voter Guide: Who’S with You?
NAACP Voter Guide: Who’s With You? ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES The Republican legislators who now control the NC General Assembly got elected in 2010 when most voters stayed home. They redrew their districts to make it easier to get re-elected in 2012. Then they passed dozens of laws that hurt North Carolina: they gave tax breaks to the rich but big cuts to public education, health care, unemployment assistance, and more. They also want to make it harder for you to vote. It all began in 2010 when they won with support from just 1 out of 4 eligible voters, because most voters didn’t show up. DON’T SIT OUT 2014! Tell others: Vote! Elections Matter! Photo by Phil Fonville U.S. SENATE CONTEST U.S. HOUSE CONTESTS The winner of the U.S. Senate contest in NC could SEE THE MAP BELOW FOR YOUR CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT determine which political party controls the Senate. Vote in your district’s contest. See more districts on the next page The Senate can block the President’s appointments Republican candidates appear first in each partisan race on the ballot. for the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts; it also Current Members are in color: Republicans and Democrats. adopts laws and the U.S. budget affecting everyone. District 1 (choose one) District 2 (choose one) ARTHUR RICH (R) G.K. BUTTERFIELD (D) RENEE ELLMERS (R) CLAY AIKENS (D) Republican THOM TILLIS Democrat KAY HAGAN “Take steps to increase Strong supporter of “Limit the growth of the “Fight for North Caro- respect for educators” Affordable Care Act federal government.” linians, not a party.” NC House Speaker Thom Tillis is running against U.S. -
To the User | NCCPPR
Search this Site North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research ...Your source for nonpartisan research & analysis Home › NC Legislature › Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature To The User How to Use the Citizens' Guide to the Legislature The North Carolina Senate Profiles of NC Senators The North Carolina House of Representatives Profiles of NC Representatives Legislative Session Information Rankings of Legislators' Effectiveness, Attendance, Roll Call Participation, and Most Influential Lobbyists Click Here To Take A Video Tour of the Online Guide Trends in the North Carolina General Assembly N.C. Center for Public Policy Donate Now » Join Now » Research Support our work, and thereby Become a part of th 5 W. Hargett St., Suite 01 North Carolina citizens, by Stay informed on th P.O. Box 430 donating through the Network policy development Raleigh, NC 27602 for Good, a donation site for world. nonprofit groups. 919-832-2839 919-832-2847 Search this Site North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research ...Your source for nonpartisan research & analysis Home › NC Legislature › Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature › To The User To The User An informed electorate is the essence of democratic government, but more than a general understanding of important issues is required if government is to fully serve the public’s interests. Informed citizens must also know something about the men and women elected to serve them as legislators. This guide has been prepared to acquaint the people of North Carolina with their state Senators and Representatives. -
2020 Election Results Handout
2020 Election Results NC General Assembly Both the North Carolina Senate and House retained Republican majorities. The NC Senate has 28 Republicans to 22 Democrats, with 12 new members (8 new Republicans, 4 new Democrats). The NC House has 69 Republicans to 51 Democrats, with 24 new members (18 new Republicans, 6 new Democrats). NC Senate Results by District and County: District Counties Elected Candidate Party New Hertford, Gates, Chowan, Perquimans, Pasquotank, 1 Camden, Currituck, Dare, Hyde, Tyrrell, Washington Bob Steinburg R 2 Carteret, Craven, Pamlico Norman W. Sanderson R Vance, Warren, Northampton, Bertie, Martin, 3 Beaufort Ernestine (Byrd) Bazemore D New 4 Halifax, Edgecombe, Wilson Milton F. "Toby" Fitch, Jr. D 5 Pitt, Greene Don Davis D 6 Jones, Onslow Michael A. Lazzara R New 7 Lenoir, Wayne Jim Perry R 8 New Hanover, Pender, Bladen, Brunswick Bill Rabon R 9 New Hanover Michael Lee R New 10 Sampson, Duplin, Johnston Brent Jackson R 11 Johnston, Nash Lisa Stone Barnes R New 12 Harnett, Lee, Johnston Jim Burgin R 13 Columbus, Robeson Danny Earl Britt, Jr. R 14 Wake Dan Blue D 15 Wake Jay J. Chaudhuri D 16 Wake Wiley Nickel D 17 Wake Sam Searcy D 18 Franklin, Wake Sarah Crawford D New 19 Cumberland Kirk DeViere D 20 Durham Natalie Murdock D 21 Cumberland, Hoke Ben Clark D 22 Durham, Granville, Person Mike Woodard D 23 Chatham, Orange Valerie P. Foushee D 24 Alamance, Guilford Amy S. Galey R New 25 Anson, Scotland, Richmond, Moore Tom McInnis R New (appointed 7/17/20; 26 Guilford, Randolph Dave Craven R won reelection) 27 Guilford Michael Garrett D 28 Guilford Gladys A. -
From the Center Out
From the Center Out Retirements and Republicans’ Redistricting Bring High Legislative Turnover for 2013 by Ran Coble “If you have lower than a ten percent turnover, there is a problem. And if you have higher than, say 20 percent, there is a problem.” — Former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon, 1969–74 ven before the November elections in 2012, 34 percent of the state’s leg- islators who began the 2011–12 session will not return to their seats in 2013. Of the 170 legislators in the 2011–12 N.C. General Assembly, 57 Emembers — including 29 Republicans and 28 Democrats — will not return next year. In addition, four more legislators will not return to the same chamber, as four House members won election to the Senate. In the 2011–12 legislature, there were 46 freshman legislators (27 percent). Sixty- one more legislators are not returning at all or to the same chamber in 2013. In the 2013–14 General Assembly, 102 legislators (60 percent) will not have been there just three years ago. A combined 652 years of institutional memory and policy expertise will be lost with this much turnover. On the other hand, there will be room for lots of new ideas. Potential for Record-Setting Turnover The modern records for highest legislative turnover were set in 1973 and 1975, when 65 and 70 new legislators, respectively, came to the General Assembly. After the general elections on November 6, 2012, North Carolina’s legislative turnover in 2013 approached but did not surpass the record turnover of the mid-1970s. -
State Legislative Scorecard
State Legislative Scorecard 2012 Session Environment North Carolina, a statewide, citizen-based environmental advocacy organization, monitors the voting records of North Carolina’s state legislators. Do your legislators support environmental protections? Their votes on key environmental issues are shown below. SENATE Lifetime SENATE VOTES Senator Dist. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Score Score 1. Protect Jordan Lake. Pro-environment vote: Yes. Senator Stein’s amendment to R Austin M. Allran 42 - - - - - - - - + + 20% 46% H-953 removed a two-year delay on requirements that developers reduce their pollution into Jordan Lake. The amendment failed. R Tom M. Apodaca 48 - - - - - - E - - - 0% 41% 2. Delay Jordan Lake protections. Pro-environment: No. H-953 included a D Robert Atwater 18 + + + + + E + E E E 100% 85% provision that delayed for two years requirements that developers reduce their pollution into Jordan Lake. The bill passed and awaited the governor’s D Doug Berger 7 + + + + + + + + + + 100% 89% signature at press time. R Philip Edward Berger 26 - - - E - - - - - - 0% 31% 3. Lift prohibitions on fracking. Pro-environment vote: No. S-820 lifted prohibitions on fracking and paved the way for the controversial form of gas R Stan Bingham 33 + + - + - - - A + + 50% 56% drilling as early as 2014. The bill became law despite the governor’s veto. R Harris Blake 22 + - - - - - - - + + 30% 41% 4. Reduce industry influence on fracking commission.Pro-environment vote: Yes. D Daniel T. Blue Jr. 14 + + + + + + + + A A 80% 76% Senator Hunt’s amendment to S-820 reduced the influence of mining and gas interests on the fracking regulatory commission and increased that of local R Andrew C. -
11/06/2018 Official General Election Results - Statewide
6/27/2019 NC SBE Contest Results Federal Council of State NC Senate NC House Judicial Referenda Cross- County Local 11/06/2018 OFFICIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS - STATEWIDE Text Size: A A | Options | Downloads Criteria Election: 11/06/2018 County: STATE Office: NC SENATE Contest: ALL Display Results Refresh Statewide Info Last County Submit: November 27, 2018 8:55 am Legislative Defendants Trial Last County Upload: November 27, 2018 8:55 am Ex.049 Precincts Reported: 100.00% (2,706 out of 2,706) 100.00% Ballots Cast: 52.98% (3,755,778 out of 7,089,657) 52.98% NC STATE SENATE DISTRICT 01 (VOTE FOR 1) Precincts Reported: 90 of 90 NAME ON BALLOT PARTY BALLOT COUNT PERCENT Bob Steinburg REP 39,815 53.21% D. Cole Phelps DEM 35,017 46.79% NC STATE SENATE DISTRICT 02 (VOTE FOR 1) Precincts Reported: 64 of 64 NAME ON BALLOT PARTY BALLOT COUNT PERCENT Norman Sanderson REP 42,898 61.78% Ginger Garner DEM 24,644 35.49% Tim Harris LIB 1,894 2.73% NC STATE SENATE DISTRICT 03 (VOTE FOR 1) Precincts Reported: 90 of 90 NAME ON BALLOT PARTY BALLOT COUNT PERCENT Erica D. Smith DEM 33,942 53.86% C. (Chuck) Earley, Jr. REP 29,082 46.14% LEGISLATIVE DEFENDANTS TX049-1 https://er.ncsbe.gov/?election_dt=11/06/2018&county_id=0&office=NCS&contest=0 1/8 6/27/2019 NC SBE Contest Results NC STATE SENATE DISTRICT 04 (VOTE FOR 1) Precincts Reported: 68 of 68 NAME ON BALLOT PARTY BALLOT COUNT PERCENT Milton F. -
Genetic and Morphological Variation of Butterflies in Relict Habitats
Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 9-5-2013 12:00 AM Genetic and morphological variation of butterflies in elictr habitats Lindsay A. Crawford The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Nusha Keyghobadi The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Lindsay A. Crawford 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Crawford, Lindsay A., "Genetic and morphological variation of butterflies in elictr habitats" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1600. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1600 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genetic and morphological variation of butterflies in relict habitats (Thesis format: Integrated Article) by Lindsay Ann Crawford Graduate Program in Biology with Environment & Sustainability A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Lindsay A. Crawford 2013 Abstract Habitat fragmentation and loss are leading threats to global biodiversity and can alter patterns of dispersal, population dynamics, and genetics with implications for long-term species persistence. Most habitat fragmentation research has focused on recently fragmented species that historically occupied interconnected habitat patches. We know comparatively little about how naturally fragmented species may respond to habitat loss. -
Butterflies and Moths of North Carolina, United States
Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail