Laplace's Equation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laplace's Equation Laplace ’s Equation 1. Equilibrium Phenomena Consider a general conservation statement for a region U in Rn containing a material which ⃗ is being transported through U by a flux field, F = F⃗x,t. Let u = u⃗x,t denote the scalar concentration field for the material (u equals the concentration at ⃗x,t). Note that u is a scalar valued function while F⃗x,t is a vector valued function whose value at each ⃗x,t is a vector whose direction is the direction of the material flow at ⃗x,t and whose magnitude is proportional to the speed of the flow at ⃗x,t. In addition, suppose there is a scalar source density field denoted by s⃗x,t. This value of this scalar at ⃗x,t indicates the rate at which material is being created or destroyed at ⃗x,t. If B denotes an arbitrary ball inside U, then for any time interval t1,t2 conservation of material requires that ⃗ ⃗ t2 ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ t2 ⃗ ∫ ux,t2 dx = ∫ ux,t1 dx − ∫ ∫ Fx,t ⋅ nxdS xdt + ∫ ∫ sx,tdxdt B B t1 ∂B t1 B Now ⃗ ⃗ t2 ⃗ ∫ ux,t2 dx − ∫ ux,t1 dx = ∫ ∫ ∂tux,tdxdt B B t1 B and t t ∫ 2 ∫ F⃗x,t ⋅ ⃗n⃗xdS xdt = ∫ 2 ∫ divF⃗x,t dxdt t1 ∂B t1 B hence t 2 ⃗ + ⃗ ⃗ = ∫ ∫ ∂tux,t divFx,t − sx,tdxdt 0 for all B ⊂ U, and all t1,t2 . 1.1 t1 B Since the integrand here is assumed to be continuous, it follows that ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ∂tux,t + divFx,t − sx,t = 0, for all x ∈ U, and all t. 1.2 Equation (1.1) is the integral form of the conservation statement, while (1.2) is the differential form of the same statement. This conservation statement describes a large number of physical processes. We consider now a few special cases, a) Transport u = u⃗x,t ⃗ ⃗ F⃗x,t = ux,t V where V = constant, s⃗x,t = 0. ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ In this case, the equation becomes ∂tux,t + V ⋅ gradux,t = 0 b) Steady Diffusion u = u⃗x F⃗x,t = −K∇ux where K = constant > 0, s = s⃗x. In this case, the equation becomes − K divgradu⃗x = s⃗x or − K ∇2u⃗x = s⃗x. This is the equation that governs steady state diffusion of the contaminant through the region U. The equation is called Poisson ’s equation if s⃗x ≠ 0, 1 and Laplace ’s equation when s⃗x = 0. These are the equations we will study in this section. Another situation which leads to Laplace’s equation involves a steady state vector field ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ V = V⃗x having the property that div Vx = 0. When V denotes the velocity field for an ⃗ ⃗ incompressible fluid, the vanishing divergence expresses that V conserves mass. When V denotes the magnetic force field in a magnetostatic field, the vanishing divergence asserts ⃗ that there are no magnetic sources. In the case that V represents the vector field of electric force, the equation is the statement that U contains no electric charges. In addition to the ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ equation div Vx = 0, it may happen that V satisfies the equation, curl Vx = 0. This ⃗ condition asserts that the field V is conservative (energy conserving). Moreover, it is a ⃗ ⃗ standard result in vector calculus that curl Vx = 0 implies that V = −grad u⃗x, for some scalar field, u = u⃗x. Then the pair of equations, ⃗ ⃗ div Vx = 0 and curl Vx = 0, taken together, imply that ⃗ ∇2u⃗x = 0 and V = −grad u⃗x. ⃗ We say that the conservative field V is ”derivable from the potential, u = u⃗x”. To say that u is a potential is to say that it satisfies Laplace’s equation. The unifying feature of all of these physical models that lead to Laplace’s equation is the fact that they are all in a state of equilibrium. Whatever forces are acting in each model, they have come to a state of equilibrium so that the state of the system remains constant in time. If the balance of the system is disturbed then it will have to go through another transient process until the forces once again all balance each other and the system is in a new equilibrium state. 2. Harmonic Functions A function u = ux is said to be harmonic in U ⊂ Rn if: i) u ∈ C2U; i.e., u, together with all its derivatives of order ≤ 2, is continuous in U ii) ∇2u⃗x = 0 at each point in U Note that in Cartesian coordinates, ∂u/∂x1 ⃗ = = 2 2 + + 2 2 div ∇ux ∂/∂x1, ...,∂/∂xn ⋅ ⋮ ∂ u/∂x1 ... ∂ u/∂xn ∂u/∂xn = ∂∂u⃗x = ∇2u⃗x It is clear from this that all linear functions are harmonic. = 2 + + 2 A function depending on x only through the radial variable, r x1 ... xn is said to be a radial function . If u is a radial function then 2 1 = ′ = 1 2 + + 2 − 2 = ∂u/∂xi u r∂r/∂xi and ∂r/∂xi 2 x1 ... xn 2xi xi/r 2 2 2 ” 2 ′ r − xi xi/r ” 2 ′ 1 xi ∂ u/∂x = u r∂r/∂xi + u r = u r∂r/∂xi + u r − i r2 r r3 and 2 2 ⃗ = n 2 2 = ” n 2 + ′ n 1 xi ∇ ux ∑ ∂ u/∂xi u r ∑ xi/r u r ∑ − i=1 i=1 i=1 r r3 = ” + ′ n 1 = ” + n − 1 ′ u r u r r − r u r r u r We see from this computation that the radial function u = unr is harmonic for various n if: n = 1 u1”r = 0; i.e., u1r = Ar + B = + 1 ′ = 1 d ′ = = n 2 : u2”r r u r r dr ru2r 0; i.e., u2r C ln r > ” + n−1 ′ = 1−n d n−1 ′ = = 2−n n 2 : unr r unr r dr r unr 0; unr Cr 2 2 Note also that since ∇ ∂u/∂xi = ∂/∂xi∇ u, for any i, it follows that every derivative of a harmonic function is itself, harmonic. Of course this presupposes that the derivative exists but it will be shown that every harmonic function is automatically infinitely differentiable so every derivative exists and is therefore harmonic. It is interesting to note that if u and u2 are both harmonic, then u must be constant. To see this, write ∇2u2 = div gradu2 = div 2u∇u = 2∇u ⋅ ∇u + 2u∇2u = 2|∇u|2 Then ∇2u2 = 0 implies |∇u|2 = 0 which is to say, u is constant. Evidently, then, the product of harmonic functions need not be harmonic. It is easy to see that any linear combination of harmonic functions is harmonic so the harmonic functions form a linear space. It is also easy to see that if u = ux is harmonic on Rn then for any z ∈ Rn, the translate, vx = ux − z is harmonic as is the scaled function, w = wλx for all scalars λ. Finally, ∇2 is invariant under orthogonal transformations. To see this suppose coordinates x and y are related by Q11x1 + ... + Q1nxn Qx⃗ = ⃗y = ⋮ Qn1x1 + ... + Qnn xn Then ∇x = ∂/∂x1, ...,∂/∂xn and = + + = + + ∂xi ∂y1/∂xi∂y1 ... ∂yn/∂xi∂yn Q1i ∂y1 ... Qni ∂yn = (i-th row of Q)⋅∇y i.e., ∇x = Q ∇y and ∇x = Q ∇y = ∇y Q 3 2 Then ∇x = ∇x ⋅ ∇x = ∇y QQ ∇y = ∇y ∇y, for QQ = I. A transformation Q with this property, QQ = I, is said to be an orthogonal transformation. Such transformations include rotations and reflections. Problem 6 Suppose u and v are both harmonic on R3. Show that, in general, the product of u times v is not harmonic. Give one or more examples of a special case where the product does turn out to be harmonic. 3. Integral Identities Let U denote a bounded, open, connected set in Rn having a smooth boundary, ∂U. This is ⃗ sufficient in order for the divergence theorem to be valid on U. That is, if F⃗x denotes a smooth vector field over U, (i.e., F ∈ CŪ ∩ C1U and if ⃗nx denotes the outward unit normal to ∂U at x ∈ ∂U, then the divergence theorem asserts that ⃗ ⃗ ∫ divF dx = ∫ F ⋅ ⃗ndS x 3.1 U ∂U ⃗ Consider the integral identity (3.1) in the special case that Fx = ∇ux for u ∈ C1Ū ∩ C2U. Then ⃗ divFx = div ∇ux = ∇2ux ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ and F ⋅ n = ∇u ⋅ n = ∂N ux the normal derivative of u) Then (3.1) becomes 2 = ∫ ∇ uxdx ∫ ∂N uxdS x 3.2 U ∂U The identity (3.2) is known as Green ’s first identity . If functions u and v both belong to ⃗ C1Ū ∩ C2U and if Fx = vx∇ux, then ⃗ divFx = div vx∇ux = vx∇2ux + ∇u ⋅ ∇v ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ and F ⋅ n = vx∇u ⋅ n = v∂N ux ⃗ and, with this choice for F, (3.1) becomes Green ’s second identity , 2 + = ∫ vx∇ ux ∇u ⋅ ∇v dx ∫ vx∂N uxdS x 3.3 U ∂U Finally, writing (3.3) with u and v reversed, and subtracting the result from (3.3), we obtain Green ’s symmetric identity , 2 2 = ∫ vx∇ ux − ux∇ vx dx ∫ vx∂N ux − ux∂N vx dS x 3.4 U ∂U Problem 7 Let u = ux,y,z be a smooth function on R3 and let A denote a 3 by 3 matrix ⃗ whose entries are all smooth functions on R3 Let F = A∇u. If U denotes a bounded open set in R3 having smooth boundary ∂U, then find a surface integral over the boundary whose ⃗ value equals the integral of the divergence of F over U.
Recommended publications
  • The Directional Derivative the Derivative of a Real Valued Function (Scalar field) with Respect to a Vector
    Math 253 The Directional Derivative The derivative of a real valued function (scalar field) with respect to a vector. f(x + h) f(x) What is the vector space analog to the usual derivative in one variable? f 0(x) = lim − ? h 0 h ! x -2 0 2 5 Suppose f is a real valued function (a mapping f : Rn R). ! (e.g. f(x; y) = x2 y2). − 0 Unlike the case with plane figures, functions grow in a variety of z ways at each point on a surface (or n{dimensional structure). We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move -5 from a point X~ to a nearby point in a particular direction. -2 0 y 2 Figure 1: f(x; y) = x2 y2 − The Directional Derivative x -2 0 2 5 We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move ~ in a particular direction 0 from a point X to a nearby point . z -5 -2 0 y 2 Figure 2: f(x; y) = x2 y2 − y If we give the direction by using a second vector, say ~u, then for →u X→ + h any real number h, the vector X~ + h~u represents a change in X→ position from X~ along a line through X~ parallel to ~u. →u →u h x Figure 3: Change in position along line parallel to ~u The Directional Derivative x -2 0 2 5 We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move ~ in a particular direction 0 from a point X to a nearby point .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1507.07356V2 [Math.AP]
    TEN EQUIVALENT DEFINITIONS OF THE FRACTIONAL LAPLACE OPERATOR MATEUSZ KWAŚNICKI Abstract. This article discusses several definitions of the fractional Laplace operator ( ∆)α/2 (α (0, 2)) in Rd (d 1), also known as the Riesz fractional derivative − ∈ ≥ operator, as an operator on Lebesgue spaces L p (p [1, )), on the space C0 of ∈ ∞ continuous functions vanishing at infinity and on the space Cbu of bounded uniformly continuous functions. Among these definitions are ones involving singular integrals, semigroups of operators, Bochner’s subordination and harmonic extensions. We collect and extend known results in order to prove that all these definitions agree: on each of the function spaces considered, the corresponding operators have common domain and they coincide on that common domain. 1. Introduction We consider the fractional Laplace operator L = ( ∆)α/2 in Rd, with α (0, 2) and d 1, 2, ... Numerous definitions of L can be found− in− literature: as a Fourier∈ multiplier with∈{ symbol} ξ α, as a fractional power in the sense of Bochner or Balakrishnan, as the inverse of the−| Riesz| potential operator, as a singular integral operator, as an operator associated to an appropriate Dirichlet form, as an infinitesimal generator of an appropriate semigroup of contractions, or as the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator for an appropriate harmonic extension problem. Equivalence of these definitions for sufficiently smooth functions is well-known and easy. The purpose of this article is to prove that, whenever meaningful, all these definitions are equivalent in the Lebesgue space L p for p [1, ), ∈ ∞ in the space C0 of continuous functions vanishing at infinity, and in the space Cbu of bounded uniformly continuous functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cauchy Integral Theorem
    Cauchy’s Theorems I Ang M.S. Augustin-Louis Cauchy October 26, 2012 1789 – 1857 References Murray R. Spiegel Complex V ariables with introduction to conformal mapping and its applications Dennis G. Zill , P. D. Shanahan A F irst Course in Complex Analysis with Applications J. H. Mathews , R. W. Howell Complex Analysis F or Mathematics and Engineerng 1 Summary • Cauchy Integral Theorem Let f be analytic in a simply connected domain D. If C is a simple closed contour that lies in D , and there is no singular point inside the contour, then ˆ f (z) dz = 0 C • Cauchy Integral Formula (For simple pole) If there is a singular point z0 inside the contour, then ˛ f(z) dz = 2πj f(z0) z − z0 • Generalized Cauchy Integral Formula (For pole with any order) ˛ f(z) 2πj (n−1) n dz = f (z0) (z − z0) (n − 1)! • Cauchy Inequality M · n! f (n)(z ) ≤ 0 rn • Gauss Mean Value Theorem ˆ 2π ( ) 1 jθ f(z0) = f z0 + re dθ 2π 0 1 2 Related Mathematics Review 2.1 Stoke’s Theorem ¨ ˛ r × F¯ · dS = F¯ · dr Σ @Σ (The proof is skipped) ¯ Consider F = (FX ;FY ;FZ ) 0 1 x^ y^ z^ B @ @ @ C r × F¯ = det B C @ @x @y @z A FX FY FZ Let FZ = 0 0 1 x^ y^ z^ B @ @ @ C r × F¯ = det B C @ @x @y @z A FX FY 0 dS =ndS ^ , for dS = dxdy , n^ =z ^ . By z^ · z^ = 1 , consider z^ component only for r × F¯ 0 1 x^ y^ z^ ( ) B @ @ @ C @F @F r × F¯ = det B C = Y − X z^ @ @x @y @z A @x @y FX FY 0 i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem
    Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 Week 5 Summary In Section 1, we go over the Mean Value Theorem and its applications. In Section 2, we will recap what we have covered so far this term. Topics Page 1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem . .1 2 Midterm Review 5 2.1 Proof Techniques . .5 2.2 Sequences . .6 2.3 Series . .7 2.4 Continuity and Differentiability of Functions . .9 1 Mean Value Theorem The Mean Value Theorem is the following result: Theorem 1.1 (Mean Value Theorem). Let f be a continuous function on [a; b], which is differentiable on (a; b). Then, there exists some value c 2 (a; b) such that f(b) − f(a) f 0(c) = b − a Intuitively, the Mean Value Theorem is quite trivial. Say we want to drive to San Francisco, which is 380 miles from Caltech according to Google Map. If we start driving at 8am and arrive at 12pm, we know that we were driving over the speed limit at least once during the drive. This is exactly what the Mean Value Theorem tells us. Since the distance travelled is a continuous function of time, we know that there is a point in time when our speed was ≥ 380=4 >>> speed limit. As we can see from this example, the Mean Value Theorem is usually not a tough theorem to understand. The tricky thing is realizing when you should try to use it. Roughly speaking, we use the Mean Value Theorem when we want to turn the information about a function into information about its derivative, or vice-versa.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 25B Professor: Bena Tshishiku Michele Tienni Lowell House
    MATH 25B Professor: Bena Tshishiku Michele Tienni Lowell House Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] Please note that these notes are not official and they are not to be considered as a sub- stitute for your notes. Specifically, you should not cite these notes in any of the work submitted for the class (problem sets, exams). The author does not guarantee the accu- racy of the content of this document. If you find a typo (which will probably happen) feel free to email me. Contents 1. January 225 1.1. Functions5 1.2. Limits6 2. January 247 2.1. Theorems about limits7 2.2. Continuity8 3. January 26 10 3.1. Continuity theorems 10 4. January 29 – Notes by Kim 12 4.1. Least Upper Bound property (the secret sauce of R) 12 4.2. Proof of the intermediate value theorem 13 4.3. Proof of the boundedness theorem 13 5. January 31 – Notes by Natalia 14 5.1. Generalizing the boundedness theorem 14 5.2. Subsets of Rn 14 5.3. Compactness 15 6. February 2 16 6.1. Onion ring theorem 16 6.2. Proof of Theorem 6.5 17 6.3. Compactness of closed rectangles 17 6.4. Further applications of compactness 17 7. February 5 19 7.1. Derivatives 19 7.2. Computing derivatives 20 8. February 7 22 8.1. Chain rule 22 Date: April 25, 2018. 1 8.2. Meaning of f 0 23 9. February 9 25 9.1. Polynomial approximation 25 9.2. Derivative magic wands 26 9.3. Taylor’s Theorem 27 9.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mean Value Theorem) – Be Able to Precisely State the Mean Value Theorem and Rolle’S Theorem
    Math 220 { Test 3 Information The test will be given during your lecture period on Wednesday (April 27, 2016). No books, notes, scratch paper, calculators or other electronic devices are allowed. Bring a Student ID. It may be helpful to look at • http://www.math.illinois.edu/~murphyrf/teaching/M220-S2016/ { Volumes worksheet, quizzes 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, and Daily Assignments for a summary of each lecture • https://compass2g.illinois.edu/ { Homework solutions • http://www.math.illinois.edu/~murphyrf/teaching/M220/ { Tests and quizzes in my previous courses • Section 3.10 (Linear Approximation and Differentials) { Be able to use a tangent line (or differentials) in order to approximate the value of a function near the point of tangency. • Section 4.2 (The Mean Value Theorem) { Be able to precisely state The Mean Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem. { Be able to decide when functions satisfy the conditions of these theorems. If a function does satisfy the conditions, then be able to find the value of c guaranteed by the theorems. { Be able to use The Mean Value Theorem, Rolle's Theorem, or earlier important the- orems such as The Intermediate Value Theorem to prove some other fact. In the homework these often involved roots, solutions, x-intercepts, or intersection points. • Section 4.8 (Newton's Method) { Understand the graphical basis for Newton's Method (that is, use the point where the tangent line crosses the x-axis as your next estimate for a root of a function). { Be able to apply Newton's Method to approximate roots, solutions, x-intercepts, or intersection points.
    [Show full text]
  • Curl, Divergence and Laplacian
    Curl, Divergence and Laplacian What to know: 1. The definition of curl and it two properties, that is, theorem 1, and be able to predict qualitatively how the curl of a vector field behaves from a picture. 2. The definition of divergence and it two properties, that is, if div F~ 6= 0 then F~ can't be written as the curl of another field, and be able to tell a vector field of clearly nonzero,positive or negative divergence from the picture. 3. Know the definition of the Laplace operator 4. Know what kind of objects those operator take as input and what they give as output. The curl operator Let's look at two plots of vector fields: Figure 1: The vector field Figure 2: The vector field h−y; x; 0i: h1; 1; 0i We can observe that the second one looks like it is rotating around the z axis. We'd like to be able to predict this kind of behavior without having to look at a picture. We also promised to find a criterion that checks whether a vector field is conservative in R3. Both of those goals are accomplished using a tool called the curl operator, even though neither of those two properties is exactly obvious from the definition we'll give. Definition 1. Let F~ = hP; Q; Ri be a vector field in R3, where P , Q and R are continuously differentiable. We define the curl operator: @R @Q @P @R @Q @P curl F~ = − ~i + − ~j + − ~k: (1) @y @z @z @x @x @y Remarks: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Formulas and Theorems
    Formulas and Theorems for Reference I. Tbigonometric Formulas l. sin2d+c,cis2d:1 sec2d l*cot20:<:sc:20 +.I sin(-d) : -sitt0 t,rs(-//) = t r1sl/ : -tallH 7. sin(A* B) :sitrAcosB*silBcosA 8. : siri A cos B - siu B <:os,;l 9. cos(A+ B) - cos,4cos B - siuA siriB 10. cos(A- B) : cosA cosB + silrA sirrB 11. 2 sirrd t:osd 12. <'os20- coS2(i - siu20 : 2<'os2o - I - 1 - 2sin20 I 13. tan d : <.rft0 (:ost/ I 14. <:ol0 : sirrd tattH 1 15. (:OS I/ 1 16. cscd - ri" 6i /F tl r(. cos[I ^ -el : sitt d \l 18. -01 : COSA 215 216 Formulas and Theorems II. Differentiation Formulas !(r") - trr:"-1 Q,:I' ]tra-fg'+gf' gJ'-,f g' - * (i) ,l' ,I - (tt(.r))9'(.,') ,i;.[tyt.rt) l'' d, \ (sttt rrJ .* ('oqI' .7, tJ, \ . ./ stll lr dr. l('os J { 1a,,,t,:r) - .,' o.t "11'2 1(<,ot.r') - (,.(,2.r' Q:T rl , (sc'c:.r'J: sPl'.r tall 11 ,7, d, - (<:s<t.r,; - (ls(].]'(rot;.r fr("'),t -.'' ,1 - fr(u") o,'ltrc ,l ,, 1 ' tlll ri - (l.t' .f d,^ --: I -iAl'CSllLl'l t!.r' J1 - rz 1(Arcsi' r) : oT Il12 Formulas and Theorems 2I7 III. Integration Formulas 1. ,f "or:artC 2. [\0,-trrlrl *(' .t "r 3. [,' ,t.,: r^x| (' ,I 4. In' a,,: lL , ,' .l 111Q 5. In., a.r: .rhr.r' .r r (' ,l f 6. sirr.r d.r' - ( os.r'-t C ./ 7. /.,,.r' dr : sitr.i'| (' .t 8. tl:r:hr sec,rl+ C or ln Jccrsrl+ C ,f'r^rr f 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Green's Theorem Via Riemann Sums
    APPROACHING GREEN’S THEOREM VIA RIEMANN SUMS JENNIE BUSKIN, PHILIP PROSAPIO, AND SCOTT A. TAYLOR ABSTRACT. We give a proof of Green’s theorem which captures the underlying intuition and which relies only on the mean value theorems for derivatives and integrals and on the change of variables theorem for double integrals. 1. INTRODUCTION The counterpoint of the discrete and continuous has been, perhaps even since Eu- clid, the essence of many mathematical fugues. Despite this, there are fundamental mathematical subjects where their voices are difficult to distinguish. For example, although early Calculus courses make much of the passage from the discrete world of average rate of change and Riemann sums to the continuous (or, more accurately, smooth) world of derivatives and integrals, by the time the student reaches the cen- tral material of vector calculus: scalar fields, vector fields, and their integrals over curves and surfaces, the voice of discrete mathematics has been obscured by the coloratura of continuous mathematics. Our aim in this article is to restore the bal- ance of the voices by showing how Green’s Theorem can be understood from the discrete point of view. Although Green’s Theorem admits many generalizations (the most important un- doubtedly being the Generalized Stokes’ Theorem from the theory of differentiable manifolds), we restrict ourselves to one of its simplest forms: Green’s Theorem. Let S ⊂ R2 be a compact surface bounded by (finitely many) simple closed piecewise C1 curves oriented so that S is on their left. Suppose that M F = is a C1 vector field defined on an open set U containing S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mean Value Theorem
    Math 1A: introduction to functions and calculus Oliver Knill, 2014 Lecture 16: The mean value theorem In this lecture, we look at the mean value theorem and a special case called Rolle's theorem. Unlike the intermediate value theorem which applied for continuous functions, the mean value theorem involves derivatives. We assume therefore today that all functions are differentiable unless specified. Mean value theorem: Any interval (a; b) contains a point x such that f(b) − f(a) f 0(x) = : b − a f b -f a H L H L b-a Here are a few examples which illustrate the theorem: 1 Verify with the mean value theorem that the function f(x) = x2 +4 sin(πx)+5 has a point where the derivative is 1. Solution. Since f(0) = 5 and f(1) = 6 we see that (f(1) − f(0))=(1 − 0) = 5. 2 Verify that the function f(x) = 4 arctan(x)/π − cos(πx) has a point where the derivative is 3. Solution. We have f(0) = −1 and f(1) = 2. Apply the mean value theorem. 3 A biker drives with velocity f 0(t) at position f(b) at time b and at position a at time a. The value f(b) − f(a) is the distance traveled. The fraction [f(b) − f(a)]=(b − a) is the average speed. The theorem tells that there was a time when the bike had exactly the average speed. p 2 4 The function f(x) = 1 − x has a graph on (−1; 1) on which every possible slope isp taken.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mean Value Theorem and Analytic Functions of a Complex Variable
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector J. Math. Anal. Appl. 324 (2006) 30–38 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa The mean value theorem and analytic functions of a complex variable M.A. Qazi Department of Mathematics, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA Received 9 August 2005 Available online 10 January 2006 Submitted by A.V. Isaev Abstract The mean value theorem for real-valued differentiable functions defined on an interval is one of the most fundamental results in Analysis. When it comes to complex-valued functions the theorem fails even if the function is differentiable throughout the complex plane. we illustrate this by means of examples and also present three results of a positive nature. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mean value theorem; Entire functions; Quadrinomials; Univalent functions We start by recalling the mean value theorem [8, p. 93] of real analysis. Theorem A. Let f be a real continuous function on a closed interval [a,b] which is differentiable in the open interval (a, b). Then there is a point ξ ∈ (a, b) at which f(b)− f(a)= f (ξ)(b − a). This result extends to functions whose domains lie in the complex plane provided their ranges are on the real line.Infact,ifΩ is a convex domain in the n-dimensional Euclidean space, and f is real-valued and differentiable on Ω, then f(b)− f(a)= Df (ξ ) · (b − a) = grad f(ξ),b− a (a ∈ Ω, b ∈ Ω), E-mail address: [email protected].
    [Show full text]