DOCSLIB.ORG

Court Order 2021-0126

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Court Order 2021-0126 COURT ORDER 2021-0126 Resolution of Support for the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) D2 Subway Project, Which Will Establish a Second Light Rail Alignment Through Downtown Dallas. On a motion made by Commissioner Dr. Theresa Daniel, and seconded by Commissioner Dr. Elba Garcia, the following order was passed and adopted by the Commissioners Court of Dallas County, State of Texas: BRIEFING DATE: February 2, 2021 FUNDING SOURCE: N/A Be it resolved and ordered that the Dallas County Commissioners Court does hereby Approve and authorize the Dallas County Commissioners Court to pass a resolution in support of the D2 Subway Project to support DART's FTA submittal. · Done in open Court February 2, 2021 by the fo llowing vote: IN FAVOR: County Judge Clay Jenkins, Commissioner Dr. Theresa Daniel, Commissioner JJ Koch, Commissioner John Wiley Price, and Commissioner Dr. Elba Garcia OPPOSED: None ABSTAINED: None ABSENT: None Recommended by: Alberta Blair Originating Department: Public Works Page 26 of 37 Dallas County 181 Resolution D Solicitation/Contract BRIEFING I COURT ORDER D Executive Session Commissioners Court - Feb 02 2021 D Addendum Resolution of Support for the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) D2 Subway Project, Which Will Establish a Second Light Rail Alignment Through Downtown Dallas. Briefing Date: Feb 2 2021 Funding Source: N/A Originating Department: Public Works Prepared by: Jurmerline Randle, Foreclosed Property Specialist Recommended by: Alberta Blair, Director of Public Works BACKGROUND INFORMATION: DART is currently preparing a submittal to continue to advance the D2 Subway Project through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Capital Investment Grant (CIG) program as a Core Capacity project. The D2 Subway extends from Victory Park to the Deep Ellum area as shown in the enclosed map (Enclosure 1 ). The alignment will introduce four new stations and one relocated station including: one surface station (Museum Way), three underground stations (Metro Center, Commerce, and CBD East) and the relocated Deep Ellum Station from just north of Gaston Avenue to just south of Live Oak Street (now referred to as Live Oak Station). More information about the project is available on www.DART.org/D2, including the May 2020 Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS). Planning for a second alignment has been ongoing since 2007, and DART has advanced the D2 Subway project to 30% design, which is consistent with the September 2017 resolutions of the Dallas City Council and DART Board. The Dallas County Commissioners Court voted unanimously on August 1, 2017, to approve a letter of support for the selection of the D2 Subway Victory Park Right­ of-Way Option, which is reflected in the current project design. In addition, on November 11, 2020, the Dallas City Council approved a resolution authorizing the use of parkland easements for the project, which was required to complete the Final EIS and Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD). The FTA and DART are currently completing the FEIS/ROD which is anticipated for January 2021. Federal funding through the FTA CIG program is available and DART is coordinating with the FTA to submit a request to enter the FTA Engineering phase, during which a grant agreement will be negotiated, and the project will advance through detailed design and construction. DART is requesting that the Dallas County Commissioners Court again pass a resolution in support of the D2 Subway project to support its FTA submittal. OPERATIONAL IMPACT: The D2 Subway will help to ensure the sustainability of the DART system by providing needed capacity and improving system reliability and passenger service through downtown Dallas. The alignment will allow increased capacity for more trains and enhance access and economic opportunities throughout our service area. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A LEGAL IMPACT: N/A PROJECT SCHEDULE: N/A SBE PARTICIPATION: N/A ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN COMPLIA~CE: This action models the Dallas County Administrative Plan in that the completion of these projects will result in multimodal transportation improvements and supports: Dallas County is operationally a model governmental entity. Dallas County is a proactive regional partner. Dallas County is a destination of choice for businesses and residents. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Dallas County Commissioners Court to pass a resolution in support of the D2 Subway Project to support DART's FTA submittal. OTHER: N/A MOTION: On a motion made by TBD, and seconded by TBD, the following order will be voted on by the Commissioners Court of Dallas County, State of Texas: Be it resolved and ordered that the Dallas County Commissioners Court does hereby Approve and authorize the Dallas County Commissioners Court to pass a resolution in support of the D2 Subway Project to support DART's FTA submittal. ATTACHMENTS: Dallas Co. Resolution-D2 Dallas Co. Resolution Request-D2 (002)-map ORDER NO: d.CJJ I ,... Oi J.._ (, DA TE: r-e.-hr{(tll ry :2, H ?- / STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALLAS § BE IT REMEMBERED, at a regular meeting of the Commissioners Comi of Dallas County, Texas, held on the .J.ndday of feJoa 11i1 rY, , 20.lJ on a motion made by Come-v ' : / 1'411~c Dr; Tbe1-e..5'q ()q11/e/ , and seconded by, C.01'i+ii's? len-e c 'DA Efbq Cc1e¢.J''1 the following Resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, DART proposes to constrnct a second light rail alignment through the Dallas CBD, known as the D2 Subway, to ensure long-tenn light rail transit system capacity, operational flexibility, and service reliability; and · WHEREAS, between 2007 and 2015, DART engaged with the community in a comprehensive planning process to develop a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for a D2 alignment; and WHEREAS, during 2016 while DART conducted project development for a mostly at-grade LPA alignment along Jackson/Young Streets, there was significant conununity and stakeholder concern with the at-grade alignment and a desire to pu.rsue a subway alignment; and, WHEREAS, on October 11, 2016 (Resolution No. 161692) the Dallas City Council directed DART to develop a subway between Woodall Rodgers Freeway and Interstate 345 (I-345); and WHEREAS, in 2017, DART conducted a comprehensive review of subway alternatives in coordination with a technical and stakeholder work group and received broad-based suppmi for a subway aligmnent along Commerce Street; and, WHEREAS, on August 1, 2017, the Dallas County Conm1issioners Court unanimously passed a resolution in support ofDART's plan to establish the D2 Subway project using the Victory Park Right-of-Way; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2017 (Resolution No. 171426) the Dallas City Counci l approved by resolution a new LP A generally referred to as the D2 Subway using Conunerce Street through Victory and Swiss A venues; and WHEREAS, DART has advanced the D2 Subway to the 30% design level in conjunction with an extensive stakeholder and community engagement process; and WHEREAS, the D2 Subway includes four new stations and the relocation of one station, which enhances the opportunity for transit-oriented development (TOD) and economic development; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in cooperation with DART issued a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) for a 45-day public and agency review period from May 15 to June 29, 2020, and held three public hearings in accordance with federal guidelines for the D2 Subway project; and WHEREAS, environmental impacts associated with the project will be mitigated and are documented in the Final Enviromnental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD) to be issued by the FTA; and, WHEREAS, the D2 Subway is well-positioned to qualify for a significant federal grant under the FTA Capital Investment Grant Program as a Core Capacity project; and, WHEREAS, a Dallas County resolution endorsing the D2 Subway alignment would strengthen DART's application for the FTA Core Capacity Improvement Program NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Dallas County Conunissioners Court supports the Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2 Subway) and reconm1ends it be added to the DART Service Plan and advanced through the federal grant process. DONE IN OPEN COURT, this the 02.. day of fL\ q v-L~ '20_1J_. Enclosure 1 02 Subway Alignment @EIWM ,, ··.... '· ·, '· ·... t\fr'L:'..l ,~, "· '· ·,.. , ., ' '· ··.... ........ Proposed D2 Alignment - At Grade Below Grade n.11''"' CJ Tunnel Portal -~ 131 D2 Station Existing system - LRT Alignment D LRTStation "'1 -- TRE Commuter Rail 11·;_ -,, McKinney Ave Trolley Convention ~ 0 A 0.25 Center Dallas Streetcar Station ~_:;:..- Miles ~ CBD Transfer Center DART !J?t4, pi). " 1 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For the Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2 Subway)
    Approval of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2 Subway) Dallas City Council Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability Committee August 28, 2017 Gary C. Thomas, President/Executive Director Steve Salin, VP Capital Planning 1 Discussion Topics • Purpose of Presentation • Project Background • Project Status and Key Issues • Next Steps 2 Purpose of Presentation • Brief the Committee on the process, status and selection of a Refined Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2 Subway) • Provide a draft Council Resolution for MSIS consideration for both D2 Subway and Dallas Streetcar Central Link 3 Project Background 4 Prior City Council Briefings • October 2016 – DART Board and Dallas City Council provided direction to pursue a subway alternative • DART has made two briefings to Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee (TTRPC): – February 13, 2017 TTRPC Briefing o Range of D2 Subway Alternatives, Process and Schedule – May 8, 2017 TTRPC Briefing o Short List of D2 Subway Alternatives 5 FTA Capital Investment Grant Program New Starts Small Starts Core Capacity Program Type Discretionary Discretionary Discretionary Funding Type Competitive grant Competitive grant Competitive grant Substantial corridor-based Fixed Guideway or capital investments in existing extensions to existing Fixed Guideway or fixed guideway systems that fixed guideway or extensions to existing increase capacity by not less Project Type corridor –based bus
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-20-512, Accessible Version, Capital Investment Grants Program
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2020 CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS PROGRAM FTA Should Improve the Effectiveness and Transparency of Its Reviews Accessible Version GAO-20-512 July 2020 CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS PROGRAM FTA Should Improve the Effectiveness and Transparency of Its Reviews Highlights of GAO-20-512, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found FTA’s Capital Investment Grants Sponsors of most of the 66 projects in the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) program helps fund investments in public Capital Investment Grants program told GAO that they have experienced delays transit in the United States. To be moving through at least one aspect of the program’s development process. This considered for funding through the program is a significant source of federal financial assistance that transit program, sponsors of projects, such as agencies across the United States can use to build new transit systems or extend investments in rail transit, must complete existing service. Projects compete for funding, and FTA’s role is to evaluate and a multi-step, multi-year development rate projects based on statutory criteria and make recommendations to process outlined in statute and meet FTA requirements. Congress. Based on GAO’s analysis, the causes of delays sponsors reported experiencing during the program’s development process were frequently factors The Moving Ahead For Progress in the unique to each project or local in nature, such as challenges completing 21st Century Act includes a provision for agreements with local utility companies or other rail operators. GAO to biennially review FTA’s implementation of this program.
    [Show full text]
  • DART Reference Book Was Compiled by the Capital Planning Division of the Growth/Regional Development Department
    DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT REFERENCE BOOK March 2017 Version 8.0 WHAT The Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Reference Book is a convenient and easy to use compilation of information on the DART system. It provides staff with key data, maps and contacts. The objective is to allow staff to respond to inquiries, with consistent, accurate information in a timely manner. WHO The DART Reference Book was compiled by the Capital Planning Division of the Growth/Regional Development Department. Numerous DART departments provide input and assist Capital Planning with annual updates. WHEN DART Capital Planning coordinates an update after each fiscal year ending September 30. Because some financial information does not become immediately available, the Reference Book update is completed by the second quarter (March) of the following fiscal year. AVAILABILITY A limited number of printed copies are made for senior management. A PDF version of the Reference Book is available for DART staff on DARTnet, and also on www.DART.org under About DART. VERSION CONTROL VERSION NUMBER VERSION DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES 1 8.2010 DRAFT 2 3.2011 FY10 Actual/FY11 Budget Update 3 4.2012 FY11 Actual/FY12 Budget Update 4 4.2013 FY12 Actual/FY13 Budget Update 5 3.2014 FY13 Actual/FY14 Budget Update New Board Member committee 5.1 5.2014 assignments/minor edits 6 3.2015 FY14 Actual/FY15 Budget Update Corrected LRT on-time performance for 6.1 7.2015 PDF version only. 7 3.2016 FY15 Actual/FY16 Budget Update 8 3.2017 FY16 Actual/FY17 Budget Update II DART REFERENCE BOOK – MARCH 2017 DART POINTS-OF-CONTACT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES DART MAILING/PHYSICAL ADDRESS 214-749-3278 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Central Streetcar Link
    DART Briefing – D2, Streetcar, Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) and Cotton Belt May 8, 2017 Transportation & Trinity River Project Committee Gary C. Thomas, DART Steve Salin, DART Capital Planning 0 Outline • Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2) – Status – Schedule – Alignments • Dallas Streetcar Central Link – Alignments for Study • Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) • Cotton Belt – Status – Schedule – Alignments 2 D2 Project Status • Currently in FTA Project Development (PD) – FTA Capital Investment Grant (CIG) Core Capacity program • Project refinement as subway – see newsletter update • Refined Locally Preferred Alternative decision by June 2017 • 30% Preliminary Engineering (PE) and Supplemental Draft EIS in summer 2017 3 Primary Corridors Review (January) 4 Primary Corridors Review (March) Advanced to Screening Evaluation 5 West Junction: RR ROW Eliminated • Poor geology requires special soft ground tunnel boring machine (TBM) • Small radius Option requires cut- and-cover through Dealey Plaza area • Larger radius Option impacts more buildings • Historic resource groups and property owner opposition • High risk; other more prudent and feasible alternatives available (Section 4(f) consideration) • Property owner support for Victory ROW option • Lack of new market area station 6 Elm - 2-Portal Option East Junction: Monument Options Key Issues: • Deep Ellum historic resources • Knights of Pythias (NRHP) Elm - 1-Portal Option Commerce - 2-Portal Option 7 Short-List of Alternatives 8 Pacific Alternative via Victory-Swiss 8 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. 9 Elm Alternative via Victory-Swiss 9 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. 10 Commerce Alternative via Victory-Swiss 10 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)
    Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2) Joint Stakeholder/Technical Committee Meeting May 17, 2017 Meeting Objectives • Project Status • Review of Short-List of Alternatives – Corridor Information Sheets • Recent Meetings and Coordination – Deep Ellum Charrette • Rail Portal Concepts • Station and Pedestrian Portal Concepts • Next Steps Reminders • What is a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)? – Mode, Alignment, Operating Concept • What must be submitted to FTA for the LPA? – General alignment – General station locations – Rough Order of Magnitude capital cost estimate – Schedule • What is submitted for the Core Capacity Investment Grant? – LPA Information – Project Templates – Supplemental Information Project Status WE ARE HERE LPA Refinement Evaluation Process Assessment of Key Objectives Proposed Refinements and Options Range of Reasonable Subway Screening Alternatives Evaluation Short List of Detailed Refined D2 LPA Subway Evaluation Recommendation Alternatives Dec-Jan Jan-Feb Mar-May May-June Short-List of Alternatives DART Victory ROW Swiss Avenue Pacific Alternative via Victory-Swiss 7 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. DRAFT Elm Alternative via Victory-Swiss 9 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. DRAFT Commerce Alternative via Victory-Swiss 11 Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. DRAFT Key Issues
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/19/2021 and available online at DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONfederalregister.gov/d/2021-10572, and on govinfo.gov Federal Transit Administration Limitation on Claims Against Proposed Public Transportation Projects AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice announces final environmental actions taken by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The purpose of this notice is to announce publicly the environmental decisions by FTA on the subject project and to activate the limitation on any claims that may challenge these final environmental actions. DATES: By this notice, FTA is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l). A claim seeking judicial review of FTA actions announced herein for the listed public transportation project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before [INSERT DATE 150 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Micah M. Miller, Regional Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, (404) 865-5474 or Saadat Khan, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Environmental Programs, (202) 366-9647. FTA is located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that FTA has taken final agency actions by issuing certain approvals for the public transportation project listed below. The actions on the project, as well as the laws under which such actions were taken, are described in the documentation issued in connection with the project to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and in other documents in the FTA environmental project file for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • DART - D2 Update City of Dallas Park and Recreation Board June 4, 2020 Kay Shelton, AVP DART Capital Planning Today’S Briefing
    DART - D2 Update City of Dallas Park and Recreation Board June 4, 2020 Kay Shelton, AVP DART Capital Planning Today’s Briefing • D2 Subway Overview • Background and Park Coordination • Proposed Parkland Uses – Belo Garden – Pegasus Plaza • Pegasus Plaza Workshop • Next Steps AttachMent 1 – D2 Subway Pegasus Plaza Vision Summary (May 2020) AttachMent 2 – September 5, 2019 Park and Recreation Board Briefing Presentation 2 D2 Subway and Parks Carpenter Park (adjacent; no iMpact) Pegasus Plaza (proposed headhouse) Belo Garden Main Street Garden (under; no iMpact) (adjacent; no iMpact) 3 Project Status • SuppleMental Draft Environmental IMpact StateMent (SDEIS) was issued by Federal Transit Administration on May 15, 2020 • 45-day public and agency review period through June 29, 2020 – Virtual public hearings on June 11, 2020 • Available on www.DART.org/D2 • 20% design is available as part of SDEIS and was provided early to City staff for review – City design review workshop held May 12, 2020 4 Background and Park Coordination • Park and Recreation Board briefed by DART on SepteMber 5, 2019. • Park and Recreation Board approved resolution on SepteMber 19, 2019 to advance concept of integrated station headhouse with re-iMagined plaza. • Stakeholder Meeting held January 29, 2020 to establish vision and key priorities for reiMagined plaza. • Subsequent Meetings held in March 2020 with park founder and original artist to discuss vision and how public art can be re-integrated. • Urban Design Peer Review Panel briefed April 24, 2020. • D2 Subway Pegasus
    [Show full text]
  • D2 Subway Second Cbd Alignment $1.7B 3 2 2028
    D2 SUBWAY SECOND CBD ALIGNMENT D2 SUBWAY AT A GLANCE $1.7B 2028 2 11minutes Cost Estimate (2021$) Target Revenue Service Date Light Rail Lines Travel Time - Victory to Baylor Up to 50% Federal Grant (Green, Orange) 3 2 150,000 2miles Subway Stations At-Grade Stations Jobs Within 1/4 Mile of Stations Victory Station to Good Latimer (Metro Center, Commerce, CBD East) (Museum Way & Live Oak) in Deep Ellum MILES AT-GRADE PROJECT TIMELINE *Subject to Dallas City Council and DART Board approvals 1.0 MARCH 2010 COMPLETE EAST END MILES BELOW ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/ STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS EVALUATION/CITY & GRADE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD TO RECONSIDERATION OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DART APPROVALS 1.1 IMPACT STATEMENT (AA/DEIS) SUBWAY ALTERNATIVES 30% PE/FEIS/ROD 10 15 16 17 18 22 28 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 *Project also includes 0.4 miles of reconstructed track on Good Latimer SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER ENGINEERING & REVENUE 2015 2017 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE LAMAR/YOUNG/JACKSON DART BOARD APPROVES APPROVED AS LOCALLY COMMERCE VIA VICTORY/ PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (LPA) SWISS AS D2 SUBWAY LPA DART RAIL OPERATIONS WITH D2 SUBWAY PROPOSED OPERATING PLAN D2 SUBWAY GREEN/ORANGE TRANSFERS TO TRE AT SHIFT TO D2 VICTORY STATION SUBWAY (EACH AT 15/20 HEADWAY) RED/BLUE REMAIN TRANSFERS TO RED/ ON EXISTING CBD BLUE AT METRO TRANSIT MALL (EACH CENTER STATION AT 15/20 HEADWAY) ADDITIONAL PEAK CONNECTIONS TO RED LINE SERVICE FUTURE DALLAS ON EXISTING CBD STREETCAR TRANSIT MALL TO CENTRAL LINK ADD CAPACITY DID YOU KNOW? WWW.DART.ORG/D2 The benefits of the D2 Subway include increasing the capacity of the DART Light Rail system, improving reliability, enhancing operational flexibility, and creating economic development opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • DART Major Capital Projects
    DART Major Capital Projects S.A.M.E. Infrastructure Forum February 2, 2018 Agenda of Projects • Dallas CBD 2nd Light Rail Alignment (D2 Subway) • Light Rail Platform Extensions/Modifications • Cotton Belt • Central Link Streetcar Why is D2 Important? • Add Core Capacity to and through downtown – Some trains will be at capacity within a few years Why is D2 Important? • Provide Operational Flexibility for the system – Continuity of service during incidents – System expansion/added service • Enhance Mobility and Access for existing and future riders – Get our riders where they need to go How will D2 Affect Today’s Riders? Operating Plan Concept • Green and Orange to shift to D2 • Orange Line terminus to be determined 5, 6.7 – Deep Ellum – Lawnview – Other • Red Line loads addressed by extra insert trains Commerce/Victory/Swiss Alternative Commerce Alternative via Victory-Swiss Station locations for evaluation purposes only and subject to change based on subsurface and surface conditions. 7 Project Development Considerations • Portal Transition Areas • Station Location and Portal Location • Construction/Traffic Impacts • Public Involvement Program Portal Transition Areas Mockingbird Station & North Portal • Open shaft for lowering/assembling equipment • Construction staging area • Hauling routes Potential Subway Station Access Points 10 Construction/Traffic Impacts Install concrete decking/ temporary street surface Public and Agency Involvement Key to Success PUBLIC INPUT Capital Cost Estimates Alternative 2017 (Millions$) Year-of-Expenditure
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Rail Plan Chapters
    TEXAS RAIL PLAN CHAPTERS December 2019 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - TEXAS RAIL VISION 1.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 TEXAS’ GOALS FOR ITS MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............................................................. 1-1 1.3 RAIL TRANSPORTATION’S ROLE IN THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............................................... 1-6 1.4 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF TEXAS’ STATE RAIL PROGRAM ................................................................... 1-9 1.5 TEXAS’ AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT RAIL PLANNING AND INVESTMENT ....................................................... 1-15 1.6 RECENT INVESTMENTS AND INITIATIVES IN THE TEXAS RAIL SYSTEM ..................................................... 1-16 1.7 SUMMARY OF FREIGHT AND PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN TEXAS ........................................................ 1-18 1.8 TXDOT RAIL VISION ...................................................................................................................................... 1-20 1.9 RAIL VISION AND GOALS’ CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ............................. 1-20 1.10 TEXAS RAIL PLAN CONSISTENCY WITH PLANNING IN OTHER STATES AND MEXICO .............................. 1-21 CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING TEXAS RAIL SYSTEM: DESCRIPTION AND INVENTORY 2.1 EXISTING TEXAS RAIL SYSTEM: DESCRIPTION AND INVENTORY INTRODUCTION ....................................... 2-1 2.2 TRENDS
    [Show full text]
  • D2 Subway Project Overview
    The new junction with the Green Line Over the past two years, DART has met requires the existing Deep Ellum Station PROJECT OVERVIEW regularly with the Texas Department of to be shifted north to Live Oak. The Transportation (TxDOT), the City of Dallas, community supports retaining a station in and the North Central Texas Council of this growing area. However, Deep Ellum The project will be integrated within Governments (NCTCOG) to review potential stakeholders have concerns with the DART-owned right-of-way in the median I-345 concepts with D2 Subway as designed. current design. Various enhancements, of Museum Way. The proposed cross- Based on work to date, both projects can LIVE OAK refinements, and/or modifications will section maintains the sidewalk, trees, and work together although I-345 depressed SSTATIONTATION be examined as part of the East End pedestrian focus of the street. options would be deeper at the D2 crossing Evaluation process to address concerns. which would add costs. As part of the East The Museum Way Station next End Evaluation, the agencies will continue to to the Perot Museum of Nature work towards optimizing the design interface & Science will be integrated with to support a future multi-agency agreement. planned museum expansion. Enhanced pedestrian connections DART has worked with the City of Dallas MMUSEUMUSEUM WWAYAY to the surrounding area are to advance a concept that involves SSTATIONTATION included, as well as reconfigured temporary use of Pegasus Plaza for streets and parking under Woodall construction of the Commerce Station, Rogers Freeway. and then DART would rebuild the park EEASTAST PPORTALORTAL with an integrated headhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • TTA Newsletter January 2021
    January 2021 NEWSLETTER Supporting the needs of Texas’ public transportation systems through statewide advocacy and education. The Texas Transit Association would like to welcome our new Board Members The Texas Transit Association is pleased to announce that Managing Director Ellen Smyth from Sun Metro in El Paso and General Manager Scott Lewis from Longview Transit have been appointed to the Texas Transit Association Board of Directors. One of the Texas Transit Association's key roles is to educate Texans about issues affecting the public transit industry. Additionally, TTA actively supports public transportation in the State of Texas and works with legislative members to Ellen Smyth, Managing Dir. pursue additional resources to support public Sun Metro, El Paso, TX transit. In their newly appointed positions, Mrs. Smyth and Mr. Lewis will utilize Scott Lewis, General Mgr. their expertise to work closely with fellow TTA Board Members to support Longview Transit, the Texas Transit Association's goals and objectives. Also, we would like to recognize the following individuals that were re-elected to the TTA Board of Directors: Jorge Cruz-Aedo (Board President), Randy Clarke, Mario Delgado, Tom Logan, Serena Stevenson, Vicente Huerta (President-elect) and Jesse Arriaga. Congratulations to each of you. TTA Legislative Day and State Conference, Roadeo and Expo Canceled Unfortunately, with COVID-19 cases still surging across the state and travel budgets being reduced or eliminated, our board of directors was forced to make the difficult decision to cancel the upcoming Legislative Day at the Capitol and the 2021 State Conference, Roadeo, and Expo. Like everyone, we are looking forward to life returning to normal this new year and hope you will understand this decision.
    [Show full text]