DOCSLIB.ORG

Land at Durley Farm, Pound Lane, Colbury, SO40 7EJ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land at Durley Farm, Pound Lane, Colbury, SO40 7EJ Planning Development Control Committee - 15 July 2014 Report Item 3 Application No: 14/00361/FULL Full Application Site: Land At Durley Farm, Pound Lane, Colbury, SO40 7EJ Proposal: Construction of a 6.7 hectare solar farm, to include the installation of solar panels to generate electricity, with associated plant buildings; perimeter fencing; cctv cameras; landscaping and associated works Applicant: Hive Energy Limited Case Officer: Rob Ainslie Parish: DENNY LODGE 1. REASON FOR COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION Application of local significance and Parish Council views awaited. 2. DEVELOPMENT PLAN DESIGNATION No specific designation 3. PRINCIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES DP1 General Development Principles CP1 Nature Conservation Sites of International Importance CP2 The Natural Environment CP4 Climate Change CP5 Renewable Energy CP6 Pollution CP7 The Built Environment CP17 The Land Based Economy 4. SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE Not applicable 5. NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK Sec 3 - Supporting a prosperous rural economy Sec 10 - Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change Sec 11 - Conserving and enhancing the natural environment 6. MEMBER COMMENTS None received 1 7. PARISH COUNCIL COMMENTS Denny Lodge Parish Council: No comments received yet Totton & Eling Town Council: No comments received yet Ashurst & Colbury Parish Council: No comments received yet. 8. CONSULTEES 8.1 Landscape Officer: Raise objection • Concerns lie mainly with the topography of the site and the capacity of the land to take solar panels and the boundary fenci ng (and possibly CCTV) which will have a high level of visual impact due to the rising and falling of the land. • Fence panels would have to 'step' up and down to accommodate the changes in levels. Solar panels would rise and fall with the land too and be more visible from outside the site than if on the flat. • Ancient Woodland is adjacent to the site and it would be important not to compact soils in the vicinity or damage the woodland with access for large vehicles. 8.2 Ecologist: Support Subject to Conditions 8.3 Tree Officer: Concern raised about possible shading of arrays leading to threat to long term protection of central belt of trees: Awaiting further information/shading diagram from Applicant's agent. 8.4 Development Control (NFDC): No comments received 8.5 Environmental Protection (NFDC): No objection subject to condition 8.6 Highway Authority (HCC): No objection 8.7 Access Development Officer (HCC): No comments received 8.8 Natural England: No comments received 8.9 National Grid: No comments received 9. REPRESENTATIONS 9.1 New Forest Association: Strenuously object to the application. • Attitude to Photovoltaic arrays has changed since Planning Application 96086 in 2011. Realisation that ongoing subsidy is not sustainable and implications for visual amenity and wildlife have been understated. 2 • Association asks the National Park to accept the Government’s position has changed and recent comments make it clear the Government intends to take support payments away from unpopular large solar farms. • Instead support for panels on supermarket roofs, schools and businesses where they do not create visual blight. • Any suggestion in the Planning report that this application is of benefit to the nation would be erroneous and misleading. • Land ownership a consideration in that where the proportion of land used is small, an argument of insignificant reuse may have some validity. This is not the case here as extent of land ownership is not known. • Farm has always been used by a practising commoner from a commoning family. It enjoys the rights of common pasture and mast. Not untypical of a commoners holding, land being underutilised to a degree and otherwise being grazed for hay. Precise extent of Durley Farm not known, but likely that the installation will occupy a large proportion of it and the risk exists that one of the 100 or so smallholdings on which commoning depends will be lost. • Fencing will be visible from A326, more so in winter, and especially from double decker buses. Unacceptable that the view into the Park is diminished by the erection of the security fence. Further, report of the Authority's landscape officer re-stated the universal truth regarding visibility in a protected landscape. • 2011 Consensus found South Hampshire Built Up area to have sixth biggest population in the UK. Difficult now not to view Totton as part of the conurbation. Now alarm that Colbury will soon join it in Southampton. • Application is contrary to the purposes of the National Park, contrary to Policy CP5 in every respect, there are no extenuating circumstances and no benefit to the local community or the nation. Association would rigorously support the Authority in any appeal. 9.2 New Forest Commoners Defence Committee: • The land involved has been used as back up land for commoning, either for making hay/silage, or for grazing livestock for many years, certainly until the end of 2013. • Authority planning policies include preservation/protection of back up land for commoning from development which would therefore not support this application. 10. RELEVANT HISTORY 10.1 Land filling with surplus spoil form Totton Western By-Pass (NFDC/MIN/89/42483) Granted by County on 6 September 1990 3 11. ASSESSMENT 11.1 This application is for a 3MW solar farm on the north eastern edge of the National Park. The proposals for the solar arrays also include associated infrastructure such as plant buildings, fencing, CCTV and additional landscaping. 11.2 The application site is made up of two fields totalling 6.7 hectares, separated by a line of hedgerow and trees which run from west to east across the site. A small agricultural field lies to the immediate north of the site with the A326 Marchwood By-Pass beyond the field. A small field lies to the west with an Ancient Woodland, known as Pritchel's Copse beyond this field. Agricultural fields and Durley Farm are located to the south and south east of the site, whilst Colbury Farm is located to the north of the site. 11.3 The topography of the site is varied. The land is at its lowest levels to the south west and rises towards the north. However the land also drops from the south in towards the hedgerow line which separates the field. The land then rises northwards to the curtilage before dropping down again towards Colbury Farm. The site therefore has an undulating nature as far as topography is concerned. 11.4 In terms of surrounding topography it is noted that the land is relatively flat to the south east of the site. The land drops down to the north with the A326 being at a lower level. The existing screening along the A326 is relatively robust and only limited filtered views are offered towards the application site. Muttonsnow Farm to the south is at a raised level and views are afforded across to the application site from the access track to this property. 11.5 The proposed panels would be mounted on 1.86m high frames aligned in rows facing south to capture winter and summer sun angles. The frames would be designed to allow access under and around the arrays so that livestock could graze the field. The arrays would have a finite lifespan and any consent would not run for more than 25 years. 11.6 As well as a Design and Access Statement, the application is accompanied by a series of detailed reports, including Ecology and Archaeology reports and a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. 11.7 The main issues for consideration in this application are: • the extent to which the proposals comply with policies contained within the Core Strategy, the National Planning Policy Framework and National Planning Practice Guidance; • the impact of the proposals on the landscape character of the site, the surroundi ng locality and the i ntrinsic value of the 4 National Park generally; • the impact of the proposals on ecological interests; and • the wider socio-economic and environmental benefits that could accrue from the proposal 11.8 Policy Considerations - Central Government Policy & Guidance The National Planning Policy Framework is generally supportive of renewable energy with authorities being encouraged to design policies to maximise developments while ensuri ng adverse impacts are addressed satisfactorily, including cumulative landscape and visual impacts (Section 10 para 97). The issue of impact on landscape is a further focus (Section 11 Para 115) where it is confirmed that: 'Great weight should be given to conserving landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which have the highest status of protection in relation to landscape and scenic beauty.' 11.9 Subsequent to the NPPF, the government has now published the National Planning Practice Guidance which provides further advice in relation to specific topics such as renewable energy. This more recent document introduces requirements which have previously not been considerations for such schemes. 11.10 The guidance looks at what the particular planning considerations that relate to such schemes and in particular mentions that Authorities will need to consider: • encouraging the effective use of land by focusing large scale solar farms on previously developed and non-agricultural land, provided that it is not of high environmental value; • where a proposal involves greenfield land, whether the proposed use of any agricultural land has been shown to be necessary and poorer quality land has been used in preference to higher quality land; and the proposal allows for continued agricultural use where applicable and/or encourages biodiversity improvements around arrays; • the need for, and impact of, security measures such as lights and fencing; • the potential to mitigate landscape and visual impacts through, for example, screening with native hedges. 11.11 The most relevant part of the guidance infers a sequential approach whereby such schemes should firstly be considered on brownfield sites and non-agricultural land.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parish Enforcement List and Closed Cases NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ENFORCEMENT CONTROL Enforcement Parish List for Beaulieu 02 April 2019
    New Forest National Park Authority - Enforcement Control Data Date: 02/04/2019 Parish Enforcement List and Closed Cases NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ENFORCEMENT CONTROL Enforcement Parish List for Beaulieu 02 April 2019 Case Number: QU/19/0030 Case Officer: Lucie Cooper Unauthorised Change Of Use (other) Date Received: 24/1/2019 Type of Breach: Location: HILLTOP NURSERY, HILL TOP, BEAULIEU, BROCKENHURST, SO42 7YR Description: Unauthorised change of use of buildings Case Status: Further investigation being conducted Priority: Standard Case Number: QU/18/0181 Case Officer: Lucie Cooper Unauthorised Operational Development Date Received: 11/10/2018 Type of Breach: Location: Land at Hartford Wood (known as The Ropes Course), Beaulieu Description: Hardstanding/enlargement of parking area Case Status: Retrospective Application Invited Priority: Standard Case Number: CM/18/0073 Case Officer: David Williams Compliance Monitoring Date Received: 18/4/2018 Type of Breach: Location: THORNS BEACH HOUSE, THORNS BEACH, BEAULIEU, BROCKENHURST, SO42 7XN Description: Compliance Monitoring - PP 17/00335 Case Status: Site being monitored Priority: Low 2 NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ENFORCEMENT CONTROL Enforcement Parish List for Boldre 02 April 2019 Case Number: QU/19/0051 Case Officer: Katherine Pullen Unauthorised Change Of Use (other) Date Received: 26/2/2019 Type of Breach: Location: Newells Copse, off Snooks Lane, Walhampton, Lymington, SO41 5SF Description: Unauthorised change of use - Use of land for motorcycle racing Case Status: Planning Contravention Notice Issued Priority: Low Case Number: QU/18/0212 Case Officer: Lucie Cooper Unauthorised Operational Development Date Received: 29/11/2018 Type of Breach: Location: JAN RUIS NURSERIES, SHIRLEY HOLMS ROAD, BOLDRE, LYMINGTON, SO41 8NG Description: Polytunnel/s; Erection of a storage building.
    [Show full text]
  • Burley Denny Lodge Hursley Overton Minstead Binsted Beaulieu Fawley
    Mortimer Newtown West End East Ashford Hill with Headley Stratfield Saye Silchester Bramshill Woodhay Tadley Stratfield TurgisHeckfield Eversley Highclere Pamber Yateley Burghclere Kingsclere Baughurst BramleyHartley Wespall Mattingley Linkenholt Ecchinswell, Sydmonton Blackwater Faccombe Sherfield on Loddon and Hawley Vernhams and Bishops Green Sherborne St. John Hartley Wintney Ashmansworth Monk Sherborne Sherfield Park Rotherwick Dean Elvetham Heath Litchfield and Woodcott Hannington Chineham Wootton St. Lawrence Hook Fleet Hurstbourne Tarrant Rooksdown Newnham Winchfield Old Basing and Lychpit Church Crookham Dogmersfield Crookham Tangley St. Mary Bourne Mapledurwell and Up Nately Oakley Greywell Village Whitchurch Deane Odiham Ewshot Smannell Overton Winslade Appleshaw Enham Alamein Cliddesden Tunworth Penton Grafton Upton Grey Crondall Kimpton Steventon Charlton Hurstbourne Priors Farleigh Wallop Weston Corbett Fyfield Andover Laverstoke North Waltham Long Sutton Penton Mewsey Ellisfield South Warnborough Shipton Bellinger Dummer Herriard Weston Patrick Bentley Thruxton Amport Longparish Nutley Monxton Popham Froyle Upper Clatford Quarley Abbotts Ann Bradley Lasham Bullington Shalden Grateley Goodworth Clatford Preston Candover Wherwell Binsted Barton Stacey Micheldever Bentworth Wonston Candovers Wield Alton Over Wallop Beech Chilbolton Kingsley Longstock Northington Worldham Leckford Chawton Headley Nether Wallop Medstead South Wonston Old Alresford Lindford Stockbridge Crawley Farringdon Grayshott Bighton Little Somborne Kings
    [Show full text]
  • New Forest Consultative Panel
    New Forest Consultative Panel 'Influencing the future of the New Forest through informed debate’ Membership Agricultural & Allied Workers National Trade Group Ashurst & Colbury Parish Council 2 January 2014 Beaulieu Parish Council Boldre Parish Council Bramshaw Parish Council Bransgore Parish Council Breamore Parish Council British Horse Society Brockenhurst Parish Council Burley Parish Council Campaign to Protect Rural England Camping & Caravanning Club Caravan Club Ltd Copythorne Parish Council Defra Denny Lodge Parish Council East Boldre Parish Council Dear Panel Members Ellingham Parish Council English Heritage Environment Agency Update on New Forest District (Outside of National Park) Exbury & Lepe Parish Council Fawley Parish Council Local Plan Part 2 Examination – Compliance with the Fordingbridge Town Council Forestry Commission Habitats Regulations Godshill Parish Council Hale Parish Council Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Hampshire Council for Voluntary Youth Services Hampshire County Council You may recall that, at the NF Consultative Panel meeting on 7 Hampshire Fed. of Women's Institutes Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Soc November 2013, a request was made for an update in Hordle Parish Council Hyde Parish Council connection with the Local Plan Part 2 Public Examination and Hythe & Dibden Parish Council specifically concerns that some of the sites did not meet the Institute of Chartered Foresters Landford Parish Council requirements of the Habitats Regulations. The New Forest Lymington & Pennington Town Council Lyndhurst Parish Council District Council has consequently submitted the attached Marchwood Parish Council Melchett Park & Plaitford Parish Council briefing paper for members’ information. Milford-on-Sea Parish Council Minstead Parish Council National Farmers Union Queries in connection with the paper can be made by National Trust Natural England contacting Louise Evans, Principal Policy Planning e-mail - Netley March Parish Council New Forest Access For All [email protected] or tel.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. the Honour You Have Done Me By
    PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. By O. G. S. CRAWFORD, F.B.A., F.S.A. HE honour you have done me by electing me as your President for the forthcoming year is one that I appreciate highly and Tfor which I thank you. Like our retiring President, I am a Hampshire man, and we both have a particular affection for the lower reaches of the Test valley, where we live. I shall try, during my term of office, to emulate him and to be present at as many of our Field Meetings as possible ; and I hope that we shall often see him there too. These peregrinations through the country are, in my considered opinion,, of very great value not only to ourselves, but to the County and country. They show people that there are quite a number of people who obviously take an interest in things old and things beautiful, in the physical structure of our country and the earlier forms of life that inhabited it, in the birds and plants that now live here. Without such occasional demonstrations their existence is in danger of being overlooked by those whose eyes have not been opened to the interesting tilings that swarm around them, if they only knew it. To take antiquities only : In the course of my own field-work I have come across several instances outside Hampshire where people have refrained from damage or destruction not from any interest of their own, but simply because they know that others are interested in them; and because they are decent people they respect that interest, even without sharing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Archaeology in Hampshire Annual Report 2015 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Annual Report of Archaeology in Hampshire for 2015. Up until 2003 Hampshire County Coun- cil published an Annual Report of Archaeology in Hampshire. The first volume was published in 1977 (for the year 1976) and for over a quarter of a century it proved to be a valuable resource bringing together in summary fashion archaeological work carried out in a particular year, whether it was by professional organization, aca- demic institution or local society. The report ensured that knowledge of such work was easily and conveniently available to all interested parties. The final report of this ‘first series’ was published in 2004 (for 2003). Follow- ing a hiatus of several years, The Hampshire Field Club (HFC) was invited to produce a new series of reports and began with a round-up of the ‘missing’ years. These can be downloaded from the Hampshire Field Club web- site. From 2008 the report has been published annually and copies are available for download from the HFC website. Developments in technology have forced a re-think about the most efficient way to go about the publica- tion of interim statements and it was decided that an electronic format (i.e. a PDF document) provided a con- venient and cost-effective solution. It also offers the option of printing only what is required. The structure and content of the report The report is organized by District and then alphabetically by location. Individual entries consist of a location that includes a grid reference. This is followed by an identifier, usually a Site UID, which links it to a record held in The Archaeology and Historic Buildings Record (AHBR) database for Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2015, South East
    South East Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / SOUTH EAST Contents Heritage at Risk IV Dover 40 Gravesham 42 Maidstone 42 The Register VIII Sevenoaks 45 Content and criteria VIII Shepway 46 Criteria for inclusion on the Register X Swale 49 Thanet 52 Reducing the risks XII Tonbridge and Malling 54 Key statistics XV Tunbridge Wells 55 Publications and guidance XVI Medway (UA) 56 Key to the entries XVIII Milton Keynes (UA) 60 Entries on the Register by local planning XX Oxfordshire 60 authority Cherwell 60 Oxford 63 Bracknell Forest (UA) 1 South Oxfordshire 63 Brighton and Hove, City of (UA) 1 Vale of White Horse 66 South Downs (NP) 3 West Oxfordshire 68 Portsmouth, City of (UA) 70 Buckinghamshire 4 Aylesbury Vale 4 Reading (UA) 73 Chiltern 6 Southampton, City of (UA) 74 South Bucks 7 Surrey 75 Wycombe 7 Elmbridge 75 East Sussex 8 Epsom and Ewell 75 Eastbourne 8 Guildford 76 Hastings 9 Mole Valley 77 Lewes 10 Reigate and Banstead 79 Rother 11 Runnymede 79 South Downs (NP) 13 Spelthorne 80 Wealden 14 Tandridge 80 Hampshire 15 Waverley 81 Basingstoke and Deane 15 Woking 81 East Hampshire 16 West Berkshire (UA) 81 Fareham 17 West Sussex 84 Gosport 18 Hart 19 Adur 84 Havant 19 Arun 84 New Forest 20 Chichester 85 New Forest (NP) 21 Horsham 86 Rushmoor 22 Mid Sussex 87 South Downs (NP) 22 South Downs (NP) 87 Test Valley 26 Worthing 91 Winchester 28 Windsor and Maidenhead (UA) 92 Isle of Wight (UA) 31 Wokingham (UA) 93 Kent 36 Ashford 36 Canterbury 37 Dartford 39 II South East Summary 2015 or the first time, we’ve compared all sites on the Heritage at Risk Register – from houses to hillforts – to help us better understand which types of site are most Fcommonly at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 5852 the London Gazette, 25 August, 1939 1 Ii
    5852 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 25 AUGUST, 1939 1 II. Applies Part III (Double Dipping of as lies to the east of the road running from Sheep in a Double Dipping Area) of the Sheep Landlord via Blood Oaks Farm, Bramshaw, Scab Order of 1938, to the Area described in Brook, Skers Farm, Upper Canterton, Castle the Schedule and prescribes the period ex- Malwood, Minstead, Manor Wood, and Emery tending from and October to 3ist October, Down -to Lyndhu^st. 1939, as the Double Dipping Period. • III. Revokes Orders Nos. 5829 and 5*835 as In the petty sessional division of from 20th August, 1939. Romsey. .The parishes of Bossington, Mottisfont, Michelmersh, Sherfield English, Lockerley, SCHEDULE. Melchet Park and Plaitford, WeUow, Romsey Extra, Ampfield, North Baddesley, and Nurs- An Area comprising: — ling and Rownhams; and so much of the parish So much of the counties of Westmorland of King's Somborne as lies within the petty and the North and West Ridings of Yorkshire sessional division. as lies within the following boundary, namely:—Commencing at Kirkby Stephen In the petty sessional division of Church thence proceeding along the road in a Winchester. southerly direction via Nateby and Outhgill The parishes of Little Somborne, Crawley, to Moor Cock Inn; thence in a generally south Ashley, Sparsholt, Hursley, Littleton, Comp- westerly direction along the road via Garsdale ton, Otterbourne, Twyford, Golden Common, Head, Dent Station, Cowgill Houses, Dent Owslebury, Chilcomb, Itchen Valley, Kings Church, Gawthrop and Peas Gill House to Worthy, Headbourne
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Barrows
    346 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB HAMPSHIRE BARROWS. By L. V. GRINSELL. PARTS I AND II.—ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA. PART I. On p. 30 I stated that a list of field names indicating the possible former existence of barrows would be included in a future instalment of this paper. In view of the uncertainties of the times I have decided to complete this paper by the present instalment, and in order to save space the list of field names is omitted ; in any case most of them are given in Dr. Grundy's papers on Hants charters (Archaeol. Journal, Vols. 78, 81, 83, 84). PART II. 30 N.E. Grateley Disc-barrow (p. 217). This appears to be the barrow in which bones were recently found (Hants P.C., XIV, p. 270). 59 N.E. Old Winchester Hill (West). On p. 229, the quarter-sheet was given in error as 56 N.E. instead of 59 N.E. The site is very important and similar to that at Rockbourne on 54 N.W. (Fig. 4c). 80 N.W. Setley Plain Disc-barrows. I forgot to state that an account with excellent plans appeared in Sumner, New Forest, pp. 80 ff. and Plan XXII. Part HI. A List of Hampshire Bowl-Barrows. Introduction. The arrangement of the following list is based on the 6in. O.S. quarter-sheets arranged numerically. An asterisk (*) following the name of the parish denotes that the barrow is not marked on the latest edition of 6in. O.S. map prior to 1938. The finder of such a barrow is noted in the ' Other Details ' column thus :— O.G.S.C.= Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes September 2017
    NEW FOREST CONSULTATIVE PANEL Minutes of the 255th Meeting held in the Pine Room, Lyndhurst Community Centre on THURSDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 2017 Those present: Clive Chatters (Chairman) David Stone (Panel Secretariat) Jo Murphy (Panel Secretariat) Members as shown on the Official List, with the exception of those listed below for whom apologies were received Also in attendance: Lord Manners, Official Verderer of the New Forest 11 Apologies for absence 11.1 Apologies for absence were received from: Linda Palmer (Whiteparish Parish Council) Christine Ford (Ringwood Town Council) Vincent Batty (Denny Lodge Parish Council) Sami Blackstock (Beaulieu Parish Council) Mark Carter (Institute of Chartered Foresters) Nick Clark (NewForce) Patricia Banks (Milford on Sea Parish Council) Sam Dovey (NFU) 11.2 Substitutes: Ian Youdan substituted for Dudley Baker-Beall on behalf of Redlynch Parish Council Cllr Georgie Hough substituted for Dawne Wakelin on behalf of Minstead Parish Council. Paul Sherry substituted for Christine Ames on behalf of New Forest Tourism Association. 11.3 Allison Potts attended on behalf of Natural England; as Hannah Thacker has moved to another team. 12 Minutes of the meeting held on 1 June 2017 12.1 The minutes from the last meeting were agreed as a true and accurate record. 13 Matters Arising 13.1 The Chairman reminded the Panel that he was approaching four years as Chairman and that he did not intend to stand for re-election in the spring. Whilst he reassured them that he would not leave the Panel without a Chairman and 1 would be happy to continue for a few more meetings however he urged members to start considering possible candidates for the appointment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire. Southampton
    DIRECTO!(Y.] HAMPSHIRE. SOUTHAMPTON. 433 Lond. assistant ophthalmic surgeon; .A Urn an Powell Royal Southampton Yacht, 79 Above Bar street ; George M.D. hon. aural surgeon; Rev. D. Wauchope & Mrs. A. Ernest Hu£sey, hon. sec.; Charles T. Penny, assis­ J. F. Bullar, hon. secs.; Miss A. M. Monk, matron tant sec Gordon Boys' Brigade, Ogle road, Frank Herbert Comp­ Southampton Conservative, 17 Above Bar street; William ton, mana~r W alton, hon. sec Hampshire l<"emale Orphan Asyl11m, Park road, :Bellevne, Southampton & South Hants Liberal, 4 High street; F. Mrs. Ellen Warner, hon. sec.; Miss Susan Francis, H. West, sec matron Working Men's Club li; Reading Room, Princess street, Hampshire Nurses' Institute, Park road, Bellevue, Miss E. P. E. Morgan A. Turner, hon. sec.; Miss Alice Varian, matron Hospital of God's House, Winkle house; Rev. L. W. POOR LAW UNIONS. Atkins M.A. warden & chaplain Southampton Incorporation. Malortie's Almshouses, Grove street (Under Local Act, 13 George m. cop. so.) Palk Memorial Home, St. George's pl. erected in 1876 to The population in I891 was 55,463; area, x,324 acres. commemorate the philanthropy & public labours of the late Aldernian Palk J.P. ; Miss Elizh. Dawkins, matron Rateable value in I8g8, £28x,x4o. Refuge for Fallen & Friendless Women, Cross street, Board day, every alternate thnrsday. Kingsland, Mrs. Kate Ellis, matron Clerk, David Peregrine Gwillim; ofli.ces, St. Mary's street Royal South Rants Infirmary, Fanshawe street, J. L. Treasurer, Robert Chatfield Hankinson, I72 High street Thomas M.D. &; Norman Aldridge M.B. physicians; J. Collectors of Poor Rates, All Saints, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election NFDC Parishes
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Election of Parish/Town Councillors for the Parishes/Towns listed below No. to be No. to be Parish/Town Council Parish/Town Council elected elected Ashurst and Colbury 8 Hythe & Dibden (Hythe East Ward) 2 Beaulieu 8 Hythe & Dibden (Hythe West Ward) 2 Boldre (Boldre and Pilley Ward) 8 Hythe & Dibden (Langdown Ward) 1 Boldre (South Baddesley Ward) 2 Lymington & Pennington (Buckland Ward) 3 Bramshaw 7 Lymington & Pennington (Lymington 6 Town Ward) Bransgore 10 Lymington & Pennington (Pennington 6 Ward) Breamore 7 Lyndhurst 12 Brockenhurst (Brockenhurst Ward) 10 Marchwood 11 Brockenhurst (Wootton Ward) 1 Martin 7 Burley 6 Milford on Sea 12 Copythorne (Copythorne North Ward) 3 Minstead 7 Copythorne (Copythorne South Ward) 4 Netley Marsh (Netley Marsh North Ward) 1 Damerham 9 Netley Marsh (Netley Marsh South Ward) 6 Denny Lodge 7 New Milton (Barton Ward) 4 East Boldre 7 New Milton (Bashley Ward) 2 Ellingham, Harbridge & Ibsley 10 New Milton (Becton Ward) 4 Exbury and Lepe 5 New Milton (Fernhill Ward) 4 Fawley (Blackfield & Langley Ward) 5 New Milton (Milton Ward) 4 Fawley (Calshot Ward) 1 Ringwood (Ringwood East Ward) 2 Fawley (Fawley Ward) 2 Ringwood (Ringwood North Ward) 6 Fawley (Hardley Ward) 1 Ringwood (Ringwood South Ward) 6 Fawley (Holbury Ward) 6 Rockbourne 6 Fordingbridge 12 Sandleheath 7 Godshill 7 Sopley 7 Hale 6 Sway 12 Hordle (Everton South Ward) 1 Totton & Eling (Totton Central Ward) 4 Hordle (Hordle Ward) 10 Totton & Eling (Totton East Ward) 4 Hyde 7 Totton & Eling (Totton North Ward) 4 Hythe & Dibden (Butts Ash Ward) 3 Totton and Eling (Totton South Ward) 4 Hythe & Dibden (Dibden Purlieu Ward) 2 Totton and Eling (Totton West Ward) 4 Hythe & Dibden (Dibden Ward) 2 Whitsbury 5 Hythe & Dibden (Furzedown Ward) 1 Woodgreen 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Date : 14/05/18
    -1101- DENNY LODGE PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council meeting held on Monday 5th March 2018 at 7.00 pm in Beaulieu Abbey Church Hall. Present: Cllr P Roberts - Chairman Cllr J Horton Cllr A Tilbury – Vice Chairman Cllr J Green Cllr V Batty In attendance – New Forest District Councillor, Cllr M Harris; Hampshire County Councillor, Cllr K Manns; Mrs D Drodge, Parish Clerk. 1.0. To accept apologies for absence Cllr R Gover; Cllr E Elcoate 2.0. Declaration of Interest in items on the agenda None. 3.0. To confirm minutes of the parish meeting held on 8th January 2018 The minutes were agreed by Council and duly signed by the Chairman as a true record of the meeting. 4.0. Public session No public participation. 5.0. To receive the Chairman’s report I would like to introduce Deborah Drodge to the Council as Kim Penna’s replacement. Deborah is beginning a 6 month probationary period as Clerk, after which I hope we will be able to confirm her permanent position as Clerk. Kim has begun the handover process. Deborah is a resident of East Boldre, and has lived in the Forest her whole life. She is a Parish Councillor at East Boldre and has a keen interest in New Forest matters. I would like to welcome her and wish every success. On 10th January, I had a meeting with Gary North, New Forest Recreation Manager, who outlined plans for verge protection. We discussed the FC’s plans to protect Forest fridge areas, which include the instillation of ‘dragons’ teeth’ to regulate car parking.
    [Show full text]