Frederick Hoeck, Et Al. V. Compusa, Inc., Et Al. 98-CV-00998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Frederick Hoeck, Et Al. V. Compusa, Inc., Et Al. 98-CV-00998 rn1cT COURT Non r,,- sTR3CT OF TEXAS . I4 I _ -, ORIGINAL i FILED SEP a 0 1999 ... NANCY. D04 LE' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR L ay,1m NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FREDERICK HOECK, et al., On Behalf of ) Civil Action No. 3:98-CV-0998-G Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) (Consolidated With No. 3:98-CV-1457-G) Plaintiffs, ) ) CLASS ACTION VS. ) ) SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPUSA, INC., JAMES F. HALPIN, ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ROBERT S. SEAY, LAWRENCE N. ) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 MONDRY, LESLIE C. MARSHALL, ) HAROLD D. GREENBERG, RICK L. ) FOUNTAIN, PAUL F. EWERT, ROBYN ) GATCH-PRIEST and JAMES F. SKINNER, ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL \, ) 0 SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW 1. This is a class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock and publicly traded options of CompUSA, Inc. ("CompUSA" or the "Company") between 12/31/97 and 4/29/98 against CompUSA and certain of its top insiders. In 12/97, CompUSA's stock declined by 32% (from $38 on 12/1/97 to $25-3/4 on 12/29/97) due to investor concerns that CompUSA and other computer retailers were encountering slow sales growth and increasing pressure on profit margins due to increased price competition. This sharp price decline eliminated millions of dollars in value of the CompUSA stock owned and options to purchase CompUSA stock held by its insiders. 2. In order to halt this decline in CorripU SA stock and to artificially inflate it back up to higher levels so that they could sell off large amounts of their CompUSA stock, top CompUSA insiders falsely reported to the market in early 1/98, inter alia, that CompUSA was achieving strong sales in both its inexpensive PCs (below $1,000) and its higher margin computers despite the experiences of other similar computer retailers. They further represented that CompUSA's financial results were not being harmed by expanding sales of inexpensive computers, since the Company was continuing to sell a substantial number of its higher profit margin PCs to sophisticated computer users and upscale customers. These insiders went so far as to state that the trend toward low-end PCs was "healthy" for CompUSA's business. Along with these misrepresentations and others, CompUSA projected fiscal third quarter earnings to exceed the prior quarter with 1998 earnings per share ("EPS") of at least $1.35. Based upon these false statements, CompUSA's stock price recovered with a 36% increase to $35-3/8 on 3/2/98. 3. As the stock price rebounded based upon CompUSA's misrepresentations, the CompUSA executives named as defendants unloaded 564,790 shares of their CompUSA stock at prices as high as $33.15, selling off 41% of the CompUSA stock they actually owned and 100% of the stock they acquired via option exercise during the Class Period, pocketing $17.6 million in illegal insider-trading proceeds. 4. On 3/4/98, CompUSA traded as high as $33-7/16. On 3/5/98, just eight trading days after CompUSA's insiders had completed their insider-selling spree, CompUSA stock was twice halted from trading and ultimately plunged to $26 on volume of over 9 million shares (the -.1- largest one-day volume in CompUSA's history as a public company up to that point) as it leaked into the market that CompUSA was about to make a negative announcement about its 3rdQ F98 results. After the close, CompUSA revealed that it expected much lower 3rdQ F98 sales than earlier forecast. Then on 4/1/98, CompUSA revealed that its 3rdQ F98 sales fell from the prior quarter, due in large part to a decline in sales per superstore, which would result in lower than expected 3rdQ F98 EPS. CompUSA revealed that gross margins would be approximately 14.1%, lower than in any quarter in the past year. CompUSA also indicated that these adverse conditions would continue during 4thQ F98, resulting in lower margins and EPS at least one-third lower than earlier forecast for the 3rdQ and 4thQ of F98. CompUSA stock plunged from $26-7/16 on 3131198 to $20-1/2 on 411/98 on volume of 10.1 million shares — the largest one-day volume in CompUSA's history as a public company. 5. On 4/1/98, contrary to defendants representations, the Company reported that its third quarter sales fell from the prior quarter and that its fourth quarter estimates would have to be adjusted downward by at least a third. Further, defendants admitted that CompUSA's gross margins had fallen to their lowest level of the past year, despite their representations in January that the margins were protected due to its sales of high-end PCs. Immediately following these disclosures, the Company's stock plummeted an additional 22% to $20-1/2 — a price at least $10 per share less than any price obtained by defendants only five weeks earlier. On 4/29/98, the Company officially announced its third quarter results, confirming its prior announcement on 4/1/98 and indicating that net income fell 22% from the same period of fiscal 1997. Despite defendants' representations during the Class Period that the industry's trend toward lower priced PCs was "healthy" for CompUSA's business, they now revealed that because more of the computers CompUSA sold were models costing less than $1,000, profits sank to $25.4 million (or $0.27 per share) from $32.7 million (or $0.35 per share). CompUSA's stock fell to $17-3/16. These events are evidenced by the following stock chart: -2- , i .. • CornpUSA., Inc. December 1, 1997 -April 29, 1998 Daily Stock Prices vs. S&P Retail Composite index 40 Feb. 2-23, 1998 Insiders self 605,322 shares for $19,175,559 S&P Retail Composite 35 1— \ilk \ r.., ai cr, s.a qr- Al CompLISA 2 ,a 30 — 0) f a. 0 2.' TO 1, Aill041111P.r \ -9-3 Izi 25 — —6 0 0 g 13 C 20 — I 1 1 1 I 1 i 15 I _L_ 1 12/01197 12/30197 01/29/98 02127/98 03/27198 04127198 12/15/97 01/14/98 02/12198 03/13/98 04/13198 6. Defendants insider trading was unusual in timing and amount, as shown below: % of Shares Shares Actually Owned Defendants Sold Proceeds Sold Ewert 20,000 $ 639,397 21% Fountain 21,123 $ 654,790 33% Gatch-Priest 8,484 $ 271,488 55% Greenberg 16,546 $ 529,472 79% Ha/pin 360,000 $11,173,780 56% Marshall 34,166 $ 1,132,603 91% Mondry 100,000 $ 3,133,200 20% Seay 4,47 $ 141,418 68% TOTALS: 564,790 $17676,148 41% • - 3 - , r CompUSA, Inc. Quarterly Stock Sales By Defendants - Dollar Volume March 1997 - Aeril 1998 $20 $40 Class Period: 12/31/97 - 4/29/98 $15 $30 Tfc 5— E $1 () -0 3 $5 4' $10 Pre Class Period Sales $0 $0 M A M JJ A SO NDJ F M A 1997 1990 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. Jurisdiction is conferred by §27 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act"). The claims asserted herein arise under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act and Rule 10b-5. 8. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to §27 of the 1934 Act. CompUSA is headquartered in this District. The false and misleading statements were made or issued from this District. THE PARTIES 9. (a) PlaintiffFrederick Hoeck, who was appointed as a lead plaintiff in this action by Order dated June 23, 1998, purchased shares of CompUSA common stock during the Class Period, as described in the certification filed with plaintiffs initial complaint, and was damaged thereby. (b) The following individuals, who were appointed as lead plaintiffs in this action by Order dated June 23, 1998, purchased shares of CompUSA common stock and/or publicly traded options on the open market during the Class Period, as described in the certifications attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Katherine L. Blanck filed in support of the Hoeck Group's motion to -4 r be appointed lead plaintiffs, and were damaged thereby: Jeff Ackerman, Reza Ansari, Robert E. Appleby, Jr., Boris Blanter, William Blust, Benedict J. Bucalo Trust, Josephine F. Bucalo Trust, Michael Bucalo, Mary Suk Fun Cheung, John and Honey Jean Christofiles, Ronny and Lourdes Cohen, Bruce Devlin, Frankie Dinsmore, Michael Dougherty, Joseph Drazdowski, Peter Dugery, Fran and Paul Gonnelli, Jr., Charles Katsohis, John Kemendo, Ken Klein, Alan Koch, Marc Lupczynski, John Macuski, Wayman D. Merrill, John T. and Ruth Q. Neary, Philip Ramirez, Larry Rebich, Jack Rushing, George Schneider, John Special, Wieslawa Tabor, Patricia Waldschmidt, Irving M. Weiner, Stephen Winarick, and Jedidiah Yueh. (c) Plaintiff Herbert Silverberg purchased shares of CompUSA common stock during the Class Period, as described in the certification filed with plaintiffs initial complaint, and was damaged thereby. 10. Defendant CompUSA, Inc. ("CompUSA") is a large retailer of personal computers and related products and services. CompUSA operates 150+ Computer Superstores in the United States. The Company's executive offices are in Dallas, Texas. CompUSA's common stock trades in an efficient market on the New York Stock Exchange. 11. (a) Defendant James F. Halpin ("Halpin") is President, ChiefExecutive Officer and a director of the Company. During the Class Period and as part of the fraudulent scheme, Halpin sold 360,000 shares of CompUSA stock at prices as high as $31.31 per share based on inside information, pocketing over $11.1 million. These sales constituted 56% of the CompUSA stock Halpin actually owned.
Recommended publications
  • Compusa Macintosh Products Guide Winter 1992.Pdf
    Over 800 Macintosh l1t·oducts at Super Everyday Low Prices! How To Load An Apple Macintosh LC II. GreatWorks Eight full-featured At CompUSA, getting the perfect Apple® applications in one easy-to-use program. Macintosh®comp uter, configured just Word processing, data­ base, spreadsheet, illus­ the way you want is just this easy! tration and more. Everything you need to build the perfect system is right within #220)14 your reach. And of course, our friendly, knowledgeable staffers are always close by to help you load up not onlyyo ur cart, but your new computer, too! Appte• Macintosh• 12" RGB Monitor Apple's lowest cost display. Bright, vibrant colors on a high-contrast screen . .28 mm dot pitch. #9002 14 It just doesn't get any easier than this. In fact, we make • 16MHz030 it easy to load a full line of Apple• Macintosh• Processor Apple Macintosh computers, LC 4/40 Computer • 4MBRA'-.i peripherals, accessories and TI1e most affordable • 40 MB Hard Drive software . Over 800 different Madntosh color system • 1.4 MB Apple Mac• products in all! And of features a slender, modular SuperDrive· course, they're all priced design so it's easy to set up • 1 Video, 2 Serial Ports Authorized Dealer super low every day. So load and easy to use. Exce ll ent choice for business or education. • Keyboard #WJ24·1 some today. At CompUSA! Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, and ~1 a cimosh are registcrt>d tradcmarlc; of Apple Computer, In c. Quadra and SuperDrive arc trmlemarlc; of Apple Computer, Inc. A range of desktop mtd notebook contputers for business, hotne mul educati ,..~ Macintosh PCs ..................
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division
    Case 6:10-cv-00329-LED Document 485 Filed 08/09/11 Page 1 of 41 PageID #: 3621 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADJUSTACAM LLC PLAINTIFF, v. Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-329-LED AMAZON.COM, INC.; AUDITEK CORPORATION; BALTIC LATVIAN UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONES, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONE; BEST BUY CO., INC. D/B/A BEST BUY D/B/A ROCKETFISH; BEST BUY STORES, LP; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BLUE MICROPHONES, LLC; CDW CORPORATION F/K/A CDW COMPUTER CENTERS, INC.; CDW, INC.; COMPUSA.COM, INC.; CREATIVE LABS, INC.; DELL, INC.; DIGITAL INNOVATIONS, LLC; FRY’S ELECTRONICS, INC.; GEAR HEAD, LLC; HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; J&R ELECTRONICS, INC. D/B/A J&R; KOHL'S CORPORATION D/B/A KOHL'S; KOHL'S ILLINOIS, INC.; LIFEWORKS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC; MACALLY PERIPHERALS, INC. D/B/A MACALLY U.S.A; MACE GROUP, INC.; MICRO ELECTRONICS, INC. D/B/A MICRO CENTER; NEW COMPUSA CORPORATION; NEWEGG, INC.; NEWEGG.COM, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.; RADIOSHACK CORPORATION; Case 6:10-cv-00329-LED Document 485 Filed 08/09/11 Page 2 of 41 PageID #: 3622 ROSEWILL INC.; SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SYSTEMAX, INC. D/B/A COMPUSA; TARGET CORP.; TIGERDIRECT, INC.; AND WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEFENDANTS. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff AdjustaCam LLC files this Third Amended Complaint against the foregoing Defendants, namely AMAZON.COM, INC.; AUDITEK CORPORATION; BALTIC LATVIAN UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONES, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONE; BEST BUY CO., INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemax Launches All New Circuitcity.Com Website
    Systemax Launches All New CircuitCity.com Website Features Low Prices; Wide Selection; Fast Shipping; 24/7 Customer ServiceExtends Company's Leadership in Online Computer and Consumer Electronics Sales PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y., May 22, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Systemax Inc. (NYSE:SYX) today announced it has completed the acquisition of the Circuit City e-commerce business and launched the new and improved CircuitCity.com website. The new CircuitCity.com features low everyday prices, great deals, a wide selection of products, fast shipping, world-class 24/7 customer service, advanced search capabilities, and enhanced content, including photo galleries and videos of thousands of the most popular consumer electronics and computer products. Richard Leeds, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Systemax, commented, "This acquisition and quick launch of the all new CircuitCity.com further solidifies Systemax's position as a leader in online retailing of value-priced, branded computers and consumer electronics. Circuit City is one of the iconic brands in U.S. electronics retailing with a 60-year legacy. With the longstanding leadership of our TigerDirect.com business and the growing contribution of our CompUSA business acquired last year, we think Systemax is uniquely positioned to best carry forward the great Circuit City brand in the online space." On May 19, 2009 Systemax closed on its agreement to acquire certain trademarks, trade names, domains including www.CircuitCity.com, customer lists and information, and other intangible assets of Circuit City's e-commerce business. The purchase price was $14 million in cash plus a share of future revenue generated utilizing those assets over a 30-month period.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Computer: the Iceo Seizes the Internet
    UC Irvine Globalization of I.T. Title Apple Computer: The iCEO Seizes the Internet Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sq9672p Author West, Joel Publication Date 2002-10-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Apple Computer: The iCEO Seizes the Internet October 2002 JOEL WEST Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine CRITO (Center for Research on Information Technology and Organization) University of California, Irvine 3200 Berkeley Place North Irvine, California 92697-4650 949.824.6387 Tel. 949.824.8091 Fax [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________ Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine | www.crito.uci.edu Apple Computer: The iCEO Seizes the Internet Joel West <[email protected]> Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine http://www.crito.uci.edu/ October 20, 2002 Contents 1. From Innovation to Crisis...................................................................................... 2 Go-it Alone Standards Strategy .....................................................................3 Failure to Respond to Windows Challenge.................................................... 3 2. Revised Business Strategy .....................................................................................4 Technology....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Radioshack Generated Sales of Over $5 Billion in 2005 Mainly Through Its 4,972 Company Operated-Stores, 777 Kiosks, and 1,686 Dealer Outlets Located Across the US
    April 24th, 2006 Matthieu Cocq Franck Legoux Patrick de Loe Genki Oka Alexander Zorn 1 TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 5 PART I. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS................................................................................... 7 I. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW............................................................................................... 7 II. CONSUMER ELECTRONICS MARKET.................................................................... 7 A. Market Size & Growth................................................................................................... 7 B. Product and Service Description.................................................................................... 8 1. Products ...................................................................................................................... 8 2. Services..................................................................................................................... 11 3. Third-party retailing (wireless contracts).................................................................. 11 III. CUSTOMER............................................................................................................... 12 A. Household Penetration ................................................................................................. 12 B. Segmentation................................................................................................................ 13
    [Show full text]
  • TD Retail Trade Channel and Sub-Channel Definitions
    Retail Trade Channel and Sub-Channel Definitions TDLinx uses official industry-standard definitions for each trade channel when available or uses rigorous developed definitions. Industry endorsement and support of these definitions has come from: • Trade Associations: o The Food Marketing Institute (FMI) o Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) o National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) • Trade Publications o Convenience Store News o Progressive Grocer The Nielsen Company services (Nielsen, TDLinx and Spectra) are also aligned and endorse these channel definitions. Every record in the TDLinx Channel Database is classified with both a standard trade channel code and a sub-channel code. Grocery Trade Channel (trade channel code = 05) The Grocery Trade Channel includes stores selling food and non-food items, including dry grocery, canned goods and perishable items. This channel includes the following sub-channels: Conventional Supermarket, Superette, Supercenter, Limited Assortment, Natural/Gourmet Foods, Cash & Carry Warehouse and Military Commissary A “supermarket” is a full-line, self-service grocery store with annual sales volume of $2 million or more. This definition applies to individual stores regardless of total company size or sales, and therefore includes both chain and independent locations; and includes stores regardless of grocery sub-channel classification. TDLinx utilizes the supermarket trade channel definition endorsed by FMI and the leading industry publication Progressive Grocer. FMI is a nonprofit association of 1,500 food retailers and wholesalers, their subsidiaries and customers. Conventional Supermarket (sub-channel code = 5) A conventional supermarket is a traditional full-line, self-service grocery store with annual sales volume of $2 million or more. This definition applies to individual stores regardless of total company size or sales, and therefore includes both chain and independent locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded in Jan 2004; "How Smartphones Work" Symbian Press and Wiley (2006); "Digerati Gliterati" John Wiley and Sons (2001)
    HOW OPEN SHOULD AN OPEN SYSTEM BE? Essays on Mobile Computing by Kevin J. Boudreau B.A.Sc., University of Waterloo M.A. Economics, University of Toronto Submitted to the Sloan School of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASSACHUBMMIBE OF TECHNOLOGY Doctor of Philosophy at the AUG 2 5 2006 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES June 2006 @ 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grn Institute of Technology permission to and to distribute olo whole or in part. 1 Signature ot Author.. Sloan School of Management 3 May 2006 Certified by. .............................. ............................................ Rebecca Henderson Eastman Kodak LFM Professor of Management Thesis Supervisor Certified by ............. ................ .V . .-.. ' . ................ .... ...... Michael Cusumano Sloan Management Review Professor of Management Thesis Supervisor Certified by ................ Marc Rysman Assistant Professor of Economics, Boston University Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ........................................... •: °/ Birger Wernerfelt J. C. Penney Professor of Management Science and Chair of PhD Committee ARCHIVES HOW OPEN SHOULD AN OPEN SYSTEM BE? Essays on Mobile Computing by Kevin J. Boudreau Submitted to the Sloan School of Management on 3 May 2006, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract "Systems" goods-such as computers, telecom networks, and automobiles-are made up of mul- tiple components. This dissertation comprises three esssays that study the decisions of system innovators in mobile computing to "open" development of their systems to outside suppliers and the implications of doing so. The first essay considers this issue from the perspective of which components are retained under the control of the original innovator to act as a "platform" in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopping Centers and Central Business Districts Suffolk County, New York
    Shopping Centers and Central Business Districts Suffolk County, New York July 2001 Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County # New York Shopping Centers and Central Business Districts Suffolk County, New York July 2001 Suffolk County Department of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building - 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, New York 11788 This publication is on the WEB at: http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/planning Suffolk County Planning Commission Donald Eversoll - At Large CHAIRMAN Robert Martin - Town of Smithtown VICE CHAIRMAN Louis Dietz - Town of Babylon SECRETARY Edward J. Rosavitch - Town of Brookhaven Thomas M. Thorsen - Town of East Hampton Michael J. Macco - Town of Huntington Frank A. Tantone - Town of Islip Richard M. O’Dea - Town of Riverhead George J. Dickerson - Town of Shelter Island David Casciotti - Town of Southampton William Cremers - Town of Southold Laure C. Nolan - Village over 5,000 population Richard London - Village under 5,000 population Ronald Parr - At Large Linda B. Petersen - At Large Suffolk County Department of Planning Thomas A. Isles, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING REPORT PREPARATION Peter K. Lambert RESEARCH DIVISION Roy Fedelem Carol Walsh CARTOGRAPHY DIVISION Suffolk County Department of Planning Hauppauge, New York July 2001 Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................5 DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC TRENDS ..........................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
    Case 2:11-cv-00142-DF Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LBS INNOVATIONS LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. § AARON BROTHERS, INC.; § Jury Trial Demanded ACADEMY LTD. § DBA ACADEMY SPORTS + OUTDOORS; § ADAMS GOLF INC.; § ADAMS GOLF, LTD.; § COMERICA INCORPORATED; § COMPUSA.COM INC.; § CONN‟S, INC.; § FOSSIL INC.; § GAMESTOP CORP. § DBA GAMESTOP CORP. OF DELAWARE; § HOMESTYLE DINING LLC; § HOTELS.COM, L.P.; § PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC.; § RUG DOCTOR, INC.; § STAGE STORES INC.; § TIGERDIRECT, INC; AND § WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff LBS Innovations, LLC files this Complaint against Aaron Brothers, Inc.; Academy, Ltd. dba Academy Sports + Outdoors; Adams Golf Inc.; Adams Golf, Ltd.; Comerica Incorporated; CompUSA.com Inc.; Conn‟s, Inc.; Fossil Inc.; GameStop Corp. dba GameStop Corp. of Delaware; Homestyle Dining LLC; Hotels.com, L.P.; Pier 1 Imports, Inc.; Rug Doctor, Inc.; Stage Stores Inc.; TigerDirect, Inc., and Whole Foods Market, Inc. (collectively the “Defendants”) and alleges as follows. PLAINTIFF‟S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT PAGE 1 Case 2:11-cv-00142-DF Document 1 Filed 03/04/11 Page 2 of 11 PARTIES 1. Plaintiff LBS Innovations LLC (“LBSI”) is a New Jersey Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business at 53 Ramapo Mountain Drive, Wanaque, New Jersey 07465. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Aaron Brothers, Inc. (“Aaron Brothers”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063-6023.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Hoeck, Et Al. V. Compusa, Inc., Et Al. 98-CV-00998-Class
    moms u. S. DiSTR/CT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED 3 I 1998 I i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 'N !ERTY • LERK NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EY DALLAS DIVISION MP" Deputy FREDERICK HOECK, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly ) N°' 3 - • 8 0 VO 9 9 8 G Situated, ) COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF vs. ) THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT ) OF 1934 COMPUSA, INC., JAMES F. HALPIN, ) ROBERT S. SEAY, LAWRENCE N. MONDRY, ) LESLIE C. MARSHALL, HAROLD D. ) GREENBERG, RICK L. FOUNTAIN, PAUL ) F. EWERT, ROBYN GATCH-PRIEST and ) JAMES E. SKINNER, ) ) Defendants. ) Plaintiff Demands A ) Trial By Jury - , SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW 1. This is a class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock and publicly traded options of CompUSA, Inc. ("CompUSA" or the "Company") between 12/31/97 and 3/5/98, against CompUSA and certain of its top insiders. CompUSA's stock declined sharply from $38 on 12/1/97 to $25-3/4 on 12/29/97 -- 32% -- due to investor concerns that CompUSA and other computer retailers were encountering slowing sales growth and suffering profit margin pressure due to price cutting and increased sales of lower priced PCs. This sharp price decline eliminated millions of dollars in value of the CompUSA stock owned and options to purchase CompUSA stock held by its insiders. 2. In order to halt this decline in CompUSA stock and to artificially inflate it back up to higher levels so that they could sell off large amounts of their CompUSA stock, CompUSA's top insiders falsely told the securities markets that CompUSA was encountering very strong sales of its more expensive higher margin PCs, that its profit margins were intact, the industry's trend toward lower priced PCs was "healthy" for CompUSA i s business and CompUSA expected to achieve strong revenue and EPS growth during 98, with 98 earnings per share ("EPS") of at least $1.35.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division
    Case 6:10-cv-00329-LED Document 1 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADJUSTACAM LLC PLAINTIFF, Civil Action No. _______________ v. AMAZON.COM, INC.; AUDITEK CORPORATION; BALTIC LATVIAN UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONES, LLC D/B/A BLUE MICROPHONE; BLUE MICROPHONES, LLC; CDW CORPORATION F/K/A CDW COMPUTER CENTERS, INC.; CDW, INC.; CDW, LLC; COMPUSA.COM, INC.; COBRA DIGITAL, LLC; CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD.; CREATIVE LABS, INC.; DELL, INC.; DIGITAL INNOVATIONS, LLC; EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY; EZONICS CORPORATION D/B/A EZONICS COPORATION USA D/B/A EZONICS; FRY’S ELECTRONICS, INC.; GEAR HEAD, LLC; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; INTCOMEX, INC.; JASCO PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC D/B/A JASCO PRODUCTS COMPANY D/B/A JASCO; JWIN ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; KLIP XTREME LLC; KMART CORPORATION; LIFEWORKS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC; MACALLY PERIPHERALS, INC. D/B/A MACALLY U.S.A; MACE GROUP, INC.; MICRO ELECTRONICS, INC. DBA MICRO Case 6:10-cv-00329-LED Document 1 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 50 CENTER; NEW COMPUSA CORPORATION; NEWEGG, INC.; NEWEGG.COM, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.; PHOEBE MICRO INC.; PROLYNKZ, LLC; RADIOSHACK CORPORATION; ROSEWILL INC.; SEARS BRANDS, LLC; SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION D/B/A SEARS SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY; SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SAKAR, INC.; SDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SOFTWARE BROKERS OF AMERICA INC. DBA INTCOMEX CORPORATION D/B/A INTCOMEX; SYSTEMAX, INC. D/B/A COMPUSA; TARGET CORP.; TIGERDIRECT, INC.; TRIPPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY D/B/A TRIPP LITE; AND WAL-MART STORES, INC., DEFENDANTS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secrets of Apple's Retail Success
    The Secrets of Apple’s Retail Success Steve Chazin About the Author Steve Chazin is a product marketing expert, keynote speaker, eCommerce guru, viral growth specialist, seminar leader and prolific blogger at http://MarketingApple.com Steve is currently Vice President for Products at Salesforce.com, the leading cloud computing and social enterprise company. A few days after resigning from Apple in 1997, Steve was asked by Steve Jobs to help rebuild Apple’s product and marketing efforts. Consequently, Steve was part of the team that brought the iMac to market, helped return the company to profitability and created the blueprint for the future product launches of iPod, iPhone & iPad. Steve’s firsthand knowledge of how Apple was saved by better marketing is described in his free eBook and personally told through his engaging keynotes. Steve has delivered over fifty keynotes, seminars and workshops at trade shows, conferences and leadership events in more than 20 countries. An engaging and warm on-stage personality, Steve can adeptly range from traditional lectures to motivational speeches involving audience participation. Because he has built a unique practice applying and describing Apple’s marketing prowess, Steve is a frequent television, radio, and print celebrity and can be seen and heard on BBC, CNBC, ABC News, Fox News, ClearChannel Radio, quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Fortune, New York Times, LA Times, BusinessWeek, MacWorld, and is referenced in popular marketing and education textbooks. Steve can be reached at [email protected] Steve has performed extensive field research, held on site visits, and interviewed dozens of employees, customers and partners of Apple’s retail operations to produce this comprehensive guide detailing the hidden secrets behind Apple’s remarkable retail success.
    [Show full text]