Editing Puccini's Operas. The Case of "Manon Lescaut" Author(s): Suzanne Scherr Source: Acta Musicologica, Vol. 62, Fasc. 1 (Jan. - Apr., 1990), pp. 62-81 Published by: International Musicological Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/932827 Accessed: 26-02-2019 19:11 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms International Musicological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Acta Musicologica This content downloaded from 132.174.255.206 on Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:11:19 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 62 Editing Puccini's Operas The Case of "Manon Lescaut"* SUZANNE SCHERR (CHICAGO) The present study surveys the changing editorial and publishing practices of G. Ricordi & C. in Milan as applied to Giacomo Puccini's third opera and first popular success, Manon Lescaut (1893).1 In his letters the composer called it a "youthful" work with "some defects" and referred to his repeated efforts to "stabilize" the score.2 Therefore, as will be demonstrated, this oft-revised music provides typical examples of the editorial difficulties surrounding the twelve Puccini operas published by the Ricordi firm.3 Given the obvious limitations of this study, further research dedicated to the other operas is needed to construct a more exhaustive argument.4 However, some of the basic problems of editing these operas are examined in detail here.