Drosophila a Virus Is an Unusual RNA Virus with a T53 Icosahedral Core and Permuted RNA- Dependent RNA Polymerase

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drosophila a Virus Is an Unusual RNA Virus with a T53 Icosahedral Core and Permuted RNA- Dependent RNA Polymerase Journal of General Virology (2009), 90, 2191–2200 DOI 10.1099/vir.0.012104-0 Drosophila A virus is an unusual RNA virus with a T53 icosahedral core and permuted RNA- dependent RNA polymerase Rebecca L. Ambrose,1 Gabriel C. Lander,2 Walid S. Maaty,3 Brian Bothner,3 John E. Johnson2 and Karyn N. Johnson1 Correspondence 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Karyn N. Johnson 2Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA [email protected] 3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA The vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is a popular model for the study of invertebrate antiviral immune responses. Several picorna-like viruses are commonly found in both wild and laboratory populations of D. melanogaster. The best-studied and most pathogenic of these is the dicistrovirus Drosophila C virus. Among the uncharacterized small RNA viruses of D. melanogaster, Drosophila A virus (DAV) is the least pathogenic. Historically, DAV has been labelled as a picorna-like virus based on its particle size and the content of its RNA genome. Here, we describe the characterization of both the genome and the virion structure of DAV. Unexpectedly, the DAV genome was shown to encode a circular permutation in the palm-domain motifs of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This arrangement has only been described previously for a subset of viruses from the double-stranded RNA virus family Birnaviridae and the T54 single-stranded RNA virus family Tetraviridae. The 8 A˚ (0.8 nm) DAV virion structure computed from cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction indicates that the virus structural protein forms two discrete domains within the capsid. The inner domain is formed from a clear T53 lattice with similarity to the b-sandwich domain of tomato bushy stunt virus, whilst the outer domain is not ordered icosahedrally, but forms a cage-like structure that surrounds the core Received 29 March 2009 domain. Taken together, this indicates that DAV is highly divergent from previously described Accepted 27 May 2009 viruses. INTRODUCTION of the range and specificity of Drosophila responses to virus infection, it would be valuable to use viruses that naturally As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses have complex infect Drosophila with a range of pathogenicities. interactions with their hosts. Comparatively little is known about the specific responses to virus infection in insects. During the 1970s, 11 viruses were described from Recently, insect responses that are specific for virus Drosophila (Brun & Plus, 1980; Gateff et al., 1980; Jousset infection have been investigated by using the genetically & Plus, 1975; Plus, 1978). Three of these, which were tractable Drosophila melanogaster (vinegar fly) model and isolated from D. melanogaster, were described as picorna- the most pathogenic of its viruses, the dicistrovirus like viruses based on morphological and biophysical Drosophila C virus (DCV) (Cherry & Perrimon, 2004; characteristics. The three viruses, DCV, Drosophila A virus Cherry et al., 2005; Deddouche et al., 2008; Ding & (DAV) and Drosophila P virus, were shown to be different Voinnet, 2007; Dostert et al., 2005; Galiana-Arnoux et al., viruses based on serology and sizes of the capsid proteins 2006; Hedges & Johnson, 2008; Hedges et al., 2008; (Jousset et al., 1972; Plus et al., 1976). These viruses are Roxstrom-Lindquist et al., 2004; Sabatier et al., 2003; natural pathogens of D. melanogaster, with about 40 % of Teixeira et al., 2008; van Rij et al., 2006) and the birnavirus wild populations being infected with one or more of these Drosophila X virus (Zambon et al., 2005). In future studies viruses (Plus et al., 1975). The three viruses have been shown to vary in their pathogenicity, with DCV being the The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the DAV genome most pathogenic and DAV the least. It is important to have sequence reported in this paper is FJ150422. an understanding of molecular characteristics of viruses to Two supplementary figures, showing alignments of the RdRP and the facilitate these studies (Huszar & Imler, 2008). Whilst DCV deduced capsid protein sequences of DAV with those of other RNA has been well-characterized and belongs to the genus viruses, are available with the online version of this paper. Cripavirus of the family Dicistroviridae (Christian et al., 012104 G 2009 SGM Printed in Great Britain 2191 R. L. Ambrose and others 2005; Johnson & Christian, 1998), no detailed character- and stored at 220 uC until use. DAVHD virions were also isolated ization of the DAV genome or virion structure has been from infected DL2 cells by using a similar method after cells were reported. lysed by repetitive freeze–thawing at 220 uC. There are many small RNA viruses of insects that have Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of purified virus. non-enveloped, 25–40 nm particles that encapsidate pos- Purified DAVHD was analysed by TEM as described previously itive-sense RNA genomes (Christian & Scotti, 1998; (Johnson & Ball, 2003). Fauquet et al., 2005). Of these, the majority with sequenced Nuclease treatment. For nuclease treatment, 1.2 mg DAVHD genomes are included in four taxonomic groups: the double-stranded (ds) RNA, prepared in vitro as described previously families Nodaviridae, Dicistroviridae and Tetraviridae and (Hedges & Johnson, 2008), and Flock House virus (FHV) RNA the floating genus Iflavirus (Fauquet et al., 2005). However, (Johnson et al., 2001) was incubated at 37 uC with 10 U RNase ONE in recent years, a number of viruses from insects have been (Promega) for 45 min. Samples were then diluted in RNA loading characterized that do not fit clearly into one of these buffer (Ambion), heated to 65 uC and separated on a non-denaturing 1 % agarose gel; products were visualized by staining with ethidium groups (Habayeb et al., 2006; Hartley et al., 2005; van der bromide. Wilk et al., 1997). Furthermore, within the family Tetraviridae, there are viruses with diverse genome cDNA synthesis, cloning and sequence determination. RNA was organizations that are classified together because of the extracted from sucrose gradient-purified DAVHD virions by using T54 symmetry of their capsid particles (Agrawal & TriReagent (Sigma-Aldrich) as per the manufacturer’s instructions, with Johnson, 1992; Gorbalenya et al., 2002; Gordon et al., the addition of 20 mg glycogen to increase RNA recovery. First- and 1995, 1999; Hanzlik et al., 1995; Pringle et al., 2001, 2003). second-strand cDNA was synthesized by using a SuperScript double- stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) with random hexamers as As more invertebrate RNA viruses are characterized fully, it recommended by the manufacturer. The cDNA products were ligated is becoming clear that there is a previously unrecognized into the EcoRV site of phosphatase-treated pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) diversity of genome organization and expression strategies and sequenced. From these sequences, DAV-specific primers were within this group of viruses. These findings give us insight designed and used for further cDNA synthesis using SuperScript reverse both into virus evolution and into other biological transcriptase III (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. processes (Koonin et al., 2008). 59 RACE (random amplification of cDNA ends) was performed as indicated by the manufacturer (Invitrogen) to obtain sequence at the 59 Here, we describe the molecular and structural character- end of the virus genome. A poly(A) tail was added to the 39 end of ization of DAV. The 30 nm particles encapsidate a purified DAVHD RNA by using poly(A) polymerase (Ambion), and the 39 positive-sense RNA that encodes two large open reading RACE system (Invitrogen) was used as per the manufacturer’s instructions to clone the 39 end of the DAV RNA. Nucleotide sequences frames (ORFs). The first of these has significant sequence were assembled and analysed by using DNASTAR software. similarities to the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) of the tetraviruses and birnaviruses that have Cells. Drosophila DL2 cells (Schneider, 1972) were maintained at permuted RdRPs, whilst the second ORF encodes the 26 uC in Schneider’s medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 % capsid protein. Analysis of the structure of DAV virions heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. DL2 cells were 6 shows a unique capsid arrangement. seeded at 7610 cells per well into six-well tissue-culture plates and left to adhere at 26 uC overnight. Cells were infected with purified DAVHD virions in 500 ml additive-free Schneider’s medium or mock- infected and supplemented with 1.5 ml Schneider’s complete medium METHODS following incubation at 26 uC for 2 h. Infected cells were harvested at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 days post-infection (p.i.), washed in PBS and lysed in Propagation of DAV in D. melanogaster. A stock of Champetie`res either 1 ml TriReagent or 50 ml SDS-PAGE loading buffer. flies was obtained from the Drosophila Genetic Resource Centre of the Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan (stock no. 103403), and a virus- SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Virus and cell lysate free population was established essentially as described by Brun & Plus samples were heated at 99 uCin16 sample buffer for 5 min before (1980). The Australian isolate DAV was kindly provided by Dr Peter HD electrophoresis through SDS–10 % polyacrylamide gels at 170 V. Christian (Christian, 1992). DAV was diluted in sterile insect saline HD Alternatively, samples were loaded with sample buffer and a reducing (0.6 % NaCl, 0.04 % KCl, 0.024 % CaCl2 and 0.02 % NaHCO3)and agent on a NuPAGE 4–12 % Bis–Tris gradient gel in MES running injected into the haemocoel of virus-free D. melanogaster. Injected flies buffer (Invitrogen) and electrophoresed at 200 V. Proteins were were maintained on standard Drosophila medium (Sigma) for 10 days visualized by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. at 25 uC and then frozen at 220 uC until purification.
Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Infectious Bursal Disease Viruses Isolated from Commercial Chickens
    CHARACTERIZATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUSES ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL CHICKENS by Jacqueline Marie Harris A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Animal and Food Sciences Spring 2010 Copyright 2010 Jacqueline Marie Harris All Rights Reserved i CHARACTERIZATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUSES ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL CHICKENS by Jacqueline Marie Harris Approved:_______________________________________________________________ Jack Gelb, Jr., Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved:_______________________________________________________________ Jack Gelb, Jr., Ph.D. Chairperson of the Department of Animal and Food Sciences Approved:_______________________________________________________________ Robin W. Morgan, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved:_______________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jack Gelb, Jr., for his continual guidance, encouragement, and academic support throughout my graduate education. I would like to give special thanks to the members of my graduate committee for their excellent advice and contributions during my research project, especially Dr. Daral Jackwood for his VP2 sequence analysis and Dr. Egbert Mundt for his monoclonal antibody testing. I am deeply indepted to Brian Ladman whose valuable knowledge and assistance enriched my growth as a student and researcher. I am truly grateful for all of his patience and support throughout my graduate career. In addition, I would like to thank Ruud Hein’s Intervet/Schering Plough lab group, Bruce Kingham, Joanne Kramer, Dr. Conrad Pope, Marcy Troeber, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION of FIELD STRAINS of INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS (IBDV) USING MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES by ALEJANDRO BANDA (Under
    CHARACTERIZATION OF FIELD STRAINS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS (IBDV) USING MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES by ALEJANDRO BANDA (Under the Direction of Pedro Villegas) ABSTRACT This study was aimed to apply different molecular techniques in the genotyping of field strains of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) currently present in the United States and in some other countries. The different techniques included the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction / restriction fragment length polymorphism (RT- PCR/RFLP), heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA), nucleotide and amino acid sequence analysis, and riboprobe in situ hybridization (ISH). From 150 samples analyzed from the United States, 80% exhibited RFLP identical to the variant Delaware E strain, other strains detected included Sal-1, D-78, Lukert, PBG-98, Delaware A, GLS IBDV standard challenge strain –like (STC-like). The analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of the VP2 hypervariable region from six strains classified as Delaware variant E, revealed some amino acid substitutions that make them somewhat different from the original variant E strain isolated in the mid 1980s. The isolate 9109 was classified as a standard strain, but, it exhibited a unique RFLP pattern characterized by the presence of the Ssp I restriction site characteristic of the very virulent IBDV (vvIBDV) strains. The pathogenic properties of this isolate were compared to those of isolate 9865 (variant strain) and the Edgar strain. All three strains induced subclinical disease, however by in situ hybridization some differences in the tissue tropism were observed. The viral replication of the variant isolate 9865 was more restricted to the bursa of Fabricius. Isolate 9109 and the Edgar strain were also observed in thymus, cecal tonsils, spleen, kidney and proventriculus.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus Strains Isolated from the Three Types of Salmonids Farmed in Chile René A
    Manríquez et al. Virology Journal (2017) 14:17 DOI 10.1186/s12985-017-0684-x RESEARCH Open Access Molecular characterization of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus strains isolated from the three types of salmonids farmed in Chile René A. Manríquez1,2, Tamara Vera1,2, Melina V. Villalba1, Alejandra Mancilla1,2, Vikram N. Vakharia3, Alejandro J. Yañez1,2 and Juan G. Cárcamo1,2* Abstract Background: The infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) causes significant economic losses in Chilean salmon farming. For effective sanitary management, the IPNV strains present in Chile need to be fully studied, characterized, and constantly updated at the molecular level. Methods: In this study, 36 Chilean IPNV isolates collected over 6 years (2006–2011) from Salmo salar, Oncorhynchus mykiss,andOncorhynchus kisutch were genotypically characterized. Salmonid samples were obtained from freshwater, estuary, and seawater sources from central, southern, and the extreme-south of Chile (35° to 53°S). Results: Sequence analysis of the VP2 gene classified 10 IPNV isolates as genogroup 1 and 26 as genogroup 5. Analyses indicated a preferential, but not obligate, relationship between genogroup 5 isolates and S. salar infection. Fifteen genogroup 5 and nine genogroup 1 isolates presented VP2 gene residues associated with high virulence (i.e. Thr, Ala, and Thr at positions 217, 221, and 247, respectively). Four genogroup 5 isolates presented an oddly long VP5 deduced amino acid sequence (29.6 kDa). Analysis of the VP2 amino acid motifs associated with clinical and subclinical infections identified the clinical fingerprint in only genogroup 5 isolates; in contrast, the genogroup 1 isolates presented sequences predominantly associated with the subclinical fingerprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicer-2 Regulates Resistance and Maintains Homeostasis Against Zika Virus Infection in Drosophila
    Dicer-2 Regulates Resistance and Maintains Homeostasis against Zika Virus Infection in Drosophila This information is current as Sneh Harsh, Yaprak Ozakman, Shannon M. Kitchen, of September 30, 2021. Dominic Paquin-Proulx, Douglas F. Nixon and Ioannis Eleftherianos J Immunol published online 10 October 2018 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2018/10/09/jimmun ol.1800597 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2018/10/10/jimmunol.180059 Material 7.DCSupplemental http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 30, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2018 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Published October 10, 2018, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800597 The Journal of Immunology Dicer-2 Regulates Resistance and Maintains Homeostasis against Zika Virus Infection in Drosophila Sneh Harsh,* Yaprak Ozakman,* Shannon M. Kitchen,† Dominic Paquin-Proulx,†,1 Douglas F. Nixon,† and Ioannis Eleftherianos* Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks pose a massive public health threat in several countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirna Pathway Is Not Required for Antiviral Defense in Drosophila
    piRNA pathway is not required for antiviral defense PNAS PLUS in Drosophila melanogaster Marine Petita,b, Vanesa Mongellia,1, Lionel Frangeula, Hervé Blanca, Francis Jigginsc, and Maria-Carla Saleha,1 aViruses and RNA Interference, Institut Pasteur, CNRS Unité Mixte de Recherche 3569, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France; bSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut de Formation Doctorale, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France; and cDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom Edited by Anthony A. James, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved May 28, 2016 (received for review May 18, 2016) Since its discovery, RNA interference has been identified as involved Production of piRNAs is Dicer-independent and relies mainly in many different cellular processes, and as a natural antiviral on the activity of Piwi proteins, a subclass of the Argonaute family response in plants, nematodes, and insects. In insects, the small (13). Primary piRNAs are processed from single-stranded RNA interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway is the major antiviral response. In precursors, which are transcribed mostly from chromosomal loci recent years, the Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway also has consisting mainly of remnants of TE sequences, termed piRNA been implicated in antiviral defense in mosquitoes infected with clusters (14). In D. melanogaster, the cleavage of primary piRNA arboviruses. Using Drosophila melanogaster and an array of viruses precursors and generation of 5′ end of mature piRNAs were re- that infect the fruit fly acutely or persistently or are vertically trans- cently linked to Zucchini endonuclease (Zuc) activity (15–18). The mitted through the germ line, we investigated in detail the extent cleaved precursor is loaded into Piwi family Argonaute proteins to which the piRNA pathway contributes to antiviral defense in Piwi or Aubergine (Aub) and then trimmed by a still-unknown adult flies.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of Sp Serotype Strains of Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus Exhibiting Differences in Virulence
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 61: 23–32, 2004 Published October 21 Dis Aquat Org Molecular characterization of Sp serotype strains of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus exhibiting differences in virulence R. B. Shivappa1, H. Song1, K. Yao1, 4, A. Aas-Eng2, Ø. Evensen3, V. N. Vakharia1,* 1Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute and VA-MD Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 2Alpharma, Animal Health Division, PO Box 158, Skøyen, 0212 Oslo, Norway 3Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, PO Box 8146 Department, 0033 Oslo, Norway 4Present address: Wyeth-Lederle Vaccine and Pediatrics, PO Box 304, Marietta, Pennsylvania 17547, USA ABSTRACT: Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), a prototype virus of the family Birnaviridae, exhibits a high degree of antigenic variability, pathogenicity and virulence in salmonid species. The Genomic Segment A encodes all the structural (VP2 and VP3) and nonstructural (NS) proteins, whereas Segment B encodes the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (VP1). We tested 3 different IPNV isolates (Sp103, Sp116 and Sp122) isolated during field outbreaks in Norway for their ability to cause mortality in fry and post-smolt of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. The cumulative mortality fol- lowing experimental challenge in fry was 29% for Sp122 followed by 19% for Sp116 and 15% for Sp103. In post-smolt, the corresponding mortality rates were 79, 46 and 16%, respectively. Compar- isons of the deduced amino acid sequences of Segments A and B of all 3 Sp strains revealed substi- tutions of residues in 13 positions, of which 6 are in VP2, 2 in VP3, and 5 in VP1.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila Responses in Immunity and Virus-Specific Inducible
    The Journal of Immunology Broad RNA Interference–Mediated Antiviral Immunity and Virus-Specific Inducible Responses in Drosophila Cordula Kemp,*,1 Stefanie Mueller,*,1,2 Akira Goto,* Vincent Barbier,* Simona Paro,* Franc¸ois Bonnay,* Catherine Dostert,* Laurent Troxler,* Charles Hetru,* Carine Meignin,* Se´bastien Pfeffer,† Jules A. Hoffmann,* and Jean-Luc Imler*,‡ The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a good model to unravel the molecular mechanisms of innate immunity and has led to some important discoveries about the sensing and signaling of microbial infections. The response of Drosophila to virus infections remains poorly characterized and appears to involve two facets. On the one hand, RNA interference involves the recognition and processing of dsRNA into small interfering RNAs by the host RNase Dicer-2 (Dcr-2), whereas, on the other hand, an inducible response controlled by the evolutionarily conserved JAK-STAT pathway contributes to the antiviral host defense. To clarify the contribution of the small interfering RNA and JAK-STAT pathways to the control of viral infections, we have compared the resistance of flies wild-type and mutant for Dcr-2 or the JAK kinase Hopscotch to infections by seven RNA or DNA viruses belonging to different families. Our results reveal a unique susceptibility of hop mutant flies to infection by Drosophila C virus and cricket paralysis virus, two members of the Dicistroviridae family, which contrasts with the susceptibility of Dcr-2 mutant flies to many viruses, including the DNA virus invertebrate iridescent virus 6. Genome-wide microarray analysis confirmed that different sets of genes were induced following infection by Drosophila C virus or by two unrelated RNA viruses, Flock House virus and Sindbis virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigma Rhabdoviruses D Contamine and S Gaumer, CNRS, Versailles, France à 2008 Elsevier Ltd
    VIRO: 00503 a0005 Sigma Rhabdoviruses D Contamine and S Gaumer, CNRS, Versailles, France ã 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. centered on population genetics inquiries into the Glossary SIGV–Drosophila couple and descriptions of the defence g0005 Permissive allele A host allele, which allows or mechanisms developed by D. melanogaster. participates in viral propagation. g0010 Restrictive allele A host allele, which opposes viral propagation. Classification s0010 g0015 Stabilized lineage for a virus A female or male lineage with infected primordial germinal cells, which SIGV is currently classified as an unassigned member of p0020 transmits the virus to its progeny. the family Rhabdoviridae. The virion morphology, genome organization, and sequence relationships of several struc- tural proteins are clearly consistent with its assignment as a rhabdovirus. However, it is not closely related to other s0005 Introduction rhabdoviruses to be classified in any existing genus. It is closer to vesiculoviruses than to other rhabdoviruses p0005 Sigma virus (SIGV) is a rhabdovirus that naturally infects according to phylogenetic studies (Figure 1) and fruit flies (Drosophila spp.). SIGV infection causes biological properties (i.e., the CO2 symptom induced by increased sensitivity to carbon dioxide gas, which is anes- both vesiculoviruses and SIGV). thetic for flies. Whereas uninfected flies recover rapidly from the effects of CO2 exposure upon return to a normal atmosphere, flies infected with sigma virus remain irre- Virion and Genome Structure s0015 versibly paralyzed. This effect has been observed among both wild flies and laboratory strains of as many as 13 The virion is a spiked and enveloped bullet-shaped particle p0025 Drosophila species and in three of these (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila Melanogaster Mounts a Unique Immune Response to the Rhabdovirus Sigma Virusᰔ C
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, May 2008, p. 3251–3256 Vol. 74, No. 10 0099-2240/08/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02248-07 Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Drosophila melanogaster Mounts a Unique Immune Response to the Rhabdovirus Sigma virusᰔ C. W. Tsai,1† E. A. McGraw,2 E.-D. Ammar,1 R. G. Dietzgen,3 and S. A. Hogenhout1,4* Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University-OARDC, Wooster, Ohio 446911; School of Integrative Biology, Downloaded from The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia2; Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Emerging Technologies, Queensland Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia3; and Department of Disease and Stress Biology, The John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom4 Received 3 October 2007/Accepted 16 March 2008 Rhabdoviruses are important pathogens of humans, livestock, and plants that are often vectored by insects. Rhabdovirus particles have a characteristic bullet shape with a lipid envelope and surface-exposed transmem- http://aem.asm.org/ brane glycoproteins. Sigma virus (SIGMAV) is a member of the Rhabdoviridae and is a naturally occurring disease agent of Drosophila melanogaster. The infection is maintained in Drosophila populations through vertical transmission via germ cells. We report here the nature of the Drosophila innate immune response to SIGMAV infection as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes identified by microarray analysis. We have also compared and contrasted the immune response of the host with respect to two nonenveloped viruses, Drosophila C virus (DCV) and Drosophila X virus (DXV).
    [Show full text]
  • Antiviral Rnai in Insects and Mammals: Parallels and Differences
    viruses Review Antiviral RNAi in Insects and Mammals: Parallels and Differences Susan Schuster, Pascal Miesen and Ronald P. van Rij * Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (P.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-24-3617574 Received: 16 April 2019; Accepted: 15 May 2019; Published: 16 May 2019 Abstract: The RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is a potent antiviral defense mechanism in plants and invertebrates, in response to which viruses evolved suppressors of RNAi. In mammals, the first line of defense is mediated by the type I interferon system (IFN); however, the degree to which RNAi contributes to antiviral defense is still not completely understood. Recent work suggests that antiviral RNAi is active in undifferentiated stem cells and that antiviral RNAi can be uncovered in differentiated cells in which the IFN system is inactive or in infections with viruses lacking putative viral suppressors of RNAi. In this review, we describe the mechanism of RNAi and its antiviral functions in insects and mammals. We draw parallels and highlight differences between (antiviral) RNAi in these classes of animals and discuss open questions for future research. Keywords: small interfering RNA; RNA interference; RNA virus; antiviral defense; innate immunity; interferon; stem cells 1. Introduction RNA interference (RNAi) or RNA silencing was first described in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans [1] and following this ground-breaking discovery, studies in the field of small, noncoding RNAs have advanced tremendously. RNAi acts, with variations, in all eukaryotes ranging from unicellular organisms to complex species from the plant and animal kingdoms [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines and Vaccination Against Infectious Bursal Disease of Chickens: Prospects and Challenges
    PJSRR (2016) 2(2): 23-39 eISSN: 2462-2028 © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews http://www.pjsrr.upm.edu.my/ Vaccines and Vaccination against Infectious Bursal Disease of Chickens: Prospects and Challenges Pit Sze LIEWa, Mat Isa NURULFIZAb,c, Abdul Rahman OMARa,c, Ideris AINIa,c, Mohd HAIR-BEJOa,c,* aFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, bFaculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, cInstitute of Biosciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Malaysia *[email protected] Abstract – Infectious bursal disease (IBD), also known as the Gumboro disease, has been a great concern for poultry industry worldwide. The first outbreak of IBD due to very virulent (vv) IBD virus (IBDV) infection in Malaysia was reported in 1991. The major economic impact of the disease is high mortality and poor performance. The virus causes immunosuppression where if the infected chicken recovered from the acute disease, they become more susceptible to infections of other pathogens and fail to respond to vaccines. Therefore, prevention is important and vaccination has become the principal control measure of IBDV infection in chickens. The conventional attenuated live and killed vaccines are the most commonly used vaccines. With the advancement of knowledge and technology, new generation of genetically-engineered vaccines like viral vector and immune complex vaccines have been commercialised. Moreover, hatchery vaccination is becoming a common practise, in addition to farm vaccination. Currently, the disease is considerably under controlled with the introduction of vaccination. However, occasional field outbreaks are still commonly reported. The demand for vaccines that could suit the field situation continues to exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Variation in Resistance to Virus Infection in Dipteran Insects
    viruses Review Natural Variation in Resistance to Virus Infection in Dipteran Insects William H. Palmer 1,†, Finny S. Varghese 2,3,† and Ronald P. van Rij 2,3,* ID 1 Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Centre for Infection, Evolution and Immunity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Received: 10 February 2018; Accepted: 8 March 2018; Published: 9 March 2018 Abstract: The power and ease of Drosophila genetics and the medical relevance of mosquito- transmitted viruses have made dipterans important model organisms in antiviral immunology. Studies of virus–host interactions at the molecular and population levels have illuminated determinants of resistance to virus infection. Here, we review the sources and nature of variation in antiviral immunity and virus susceptibility in model dipteran insects, specifically the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and vector mosquitoes of the genera Aedes and Culex. We first discuss antiviral immune mechanisms and describe the virus-specificity of these responses. In the following sections, we review genetic and microbiota-dependent variation in antiviral immunity. In the final sections, we explore less well-studied sources of variation, including abiotic factors, sexual dimorphism, infection history, and endogenous viral elements. We borrow from work on other pathogen types and non-dipteran species when it parallels or complements studies in dipterans.
    [Show full text]