DOCSLIB.ORG

Hells Canyon Complex Aesthetic Resource Inventory and Evaluation Idaho Power Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hells Canyon Complex Aesthetic Resource Inventory and Evaluation Idaho Power Company Cryy8h8yr 6rurvpSr pr Dr hq@hyhv U@8CID86GS@QPSU 'DYLG(YDQVDQG$VVRFLDWHV,QF 6HDQ6XOOLYDQ :DUUHQ%DFRQ -RGL5LRV &LQG\0DHGD UrpuvphySr 6rqv@%" 1RYHPEHU +HOOV&DQ\RQ&RPSOH[ )(5&1R &RS\ULJKWE\,GDKR3RZHU&RPSDQ\ Aesthetic Resource Inventory and Evaluation Idaho Power Company ABSTRACT This technical report describes a study that is part of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing process for the Idaho Power Company (IPC) Hells Canyon Complex (FERC No. 1971) hydroelectric project (Project). The study was commissioned by IPC and conducted by David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA), and its purpose was to evaluate the effects of Pro- ject facilities and operations on the aesthetic environment within the Study Area. The Project is located on the Snake River, the largest river in Idaho, in the southern portion of Hells Canyon. The Project includes Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon reservoirs and the dams, powerhouses, and appurtenant facilities associated with the reservoirs. The Study Area in- cludes the Project and adjacent lands, the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area (HCNRA), and 14 transmission lines that cover approximately 658 miles and extend through northeastern Oregon and southwestern and southern Idaho. Because most of the public land in the Study Area is under either Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or US Forest Service (USFS) jurisdiction, the protocols for visual resource assessment used by these two agencies were used to conduct the study. The BLM’s protocol is called Visual Resource Management (VRM) and relies on a Visual Contrast Rating to determine the visual condition of a landscape. The USFS’s protocol is called Scenery Management System (SMS) and relies on an assessment of landscape character and scenic integrity to determine the visual and aesthetic condition of a landscape. Of 152 potential sites in the Study Area, 91 were chosen for evaluation primarily because Project facilities, operations, or effects of the operations were visible from these sites. Project facilities and operations include transmission lines, power-generating facilities and appurtenant facilities, access and service roads, and hardscape elements. Effects of operations include reservoir and river water-level fluctuation and alterations to vegetation. Of the 91 sites that were evaluated, 79 (87 percent) were determined to need some kind of miti- gation to address the visual and aesthetic impact of Project facilities or operations. Specific miti- gation measures are suggested. For suggested mitigation measures that may not be reasonable (e.g., moving transmission structures), alternative solutions are suggested. Recommendations for selecting mitigation measures for IPC’s FERC relicensing application and for a long-term visual and aesthetic resource management strategy are also given. Hells Canyon Complex Page i Aesthetic Resource Inventory and Evaluation Idaho Power Company 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Report organization...........................................................................................................................2 1.2 Links to other technical reports.........................................................................................................3 1.3 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................4 1.3.1 A brief history...........................................................................................................................4 1.3.2 Existing conditions...................................................................................................................5 1.3.2.1 Vegetation and climate ..................................................................................................5 1.3.2.2 Land use ........................................................................................................................7 1.3.2.3 Dam and reservoir operations .......................................................................................8 2 VRM Study...............................................................................................................................................10 2.1 Goals and objectives.......................................................................................................................10 2.2 VRM Study Area .............................................................................................................................11 2.3 Overview of the VRM system..........................................................................................................13 2.3.1 Visual Resource Inventory (VRI)...........................................................................................15 2.3.1.1 Scenic quality...............................................................................................................15 2.3.1.2 Visual sensitivity...........................................................................................................15 2.3.1.3 Distance zones ............................................................................................................15 2.3.2 VRM Class.............................................................................................................................15 2.3.3 Visual Contrast Rating...........................................................................................................16 2.4 Application of the VRM system to this study...................................................................................17 2.4.1 VRM Study Area Objective 1.................................................................................................17 2.4.1.1 Method.........................................................................................................................17 2.4.1.2 Results.........................................................................................................................21 2.4.2 VRM Study Area Objective 2.................................................................................................23 2.4.2.1 Method.........................................................................................................................23 2.4.2.2 Results.........................................................................................................................23 2.4.3 VRM Study Area Objective 3.................................................................................................24 2.4.3.1 Method.........................................................................................................................25 2.4.3.2 Results.........................................................................................................................25 2.4.4 VRM Study Area Objective 4.................................................................................................31 2.4.4.1 Method.........................................................................................................................31 2.4.4.2 Results.........................................................................................................................31 2.4.5 VRM Study Area Objective 5.................................................................................................32 2.4.5.1 Method.........................................................................................................................32 2.4.5.2 Results.........................................................................................................................32 3 SMS Study...............................................................................................................................................35 3.1 Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................................35 Page ii Hells Canyon Complex Aesthetic Resource Inventory and Evaluation Idaho Power Company 3.2 SMS Study Area .............................................................................................................................36 3.3 Overview of the SMS ......................................................................................................................37 3.3.1 Constituent information .........................................................................................................39 3.3.2 Special Places.......................................................................................................................40 3.3.3 Ecological factors ..................................................................................................................40 3.3.4 Existing landscape character ................................................................................................40 3.3.5 Existing scenic integrity.........................................................................................................41 3.3.6 Existing ecological integrity ...................................................................................................41 3.3.7 Recommended landscape character ....................................................................................41 3.3.8 Recommended scenic integrity .............................................................................................42 3.3.9 Recommended PM&E...........................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recreational Use Associated with the Snake River in the Hells Canyon
    5HFUHDWLRQDO 8VH $VVRFLDWHG ZLWK WKH 6QDNH 5LYHU LQ WKH +HOOV &DQ\RQ 1DWLRQDO 5HFUHDWLRQ $UHD Hh uhyy7 Srp rhvSr pr6hy 7HFKQLFDO 5HSRUW $SSHQGL[ ( Ari h !! 5HYLVHG-XO\ Cryy8h8yr A@S8I (& &RS\ULJKWE\,GDKR3RZHU&RPSDQ\ Idaho Power Company Recreational Use Associated with the Snake River TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures................................................................................................................................ iii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ vii Abstract............................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Associated Studies and Technical Reports ........................................................................3 1.2. USFS–HCNRA Boating-Related Regulations...................................................................4 1.2.1. Types of Watercraft Allowed in the HCNRA...........................................................4 1.2.2. Boating Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Stepping Forward Entering a new era for energy. 2009 Annual Report $2.64 $2.51 $2.17 $1.86 IDACORP is stepping forward on $1.50 all fronts ensuring your company is positioned to succeed in a new era for energy. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Earnings Per Share (Diluted) Current Annual Dividend $1.20 2009 Highlights Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts 2009 2008 % Change 9.5% 8.9% 7.5% 6.8% Electric Utility Revenues $1,045,996 $956,076 9.4 6.2% Other Revenue $3,804 $4,338 <12.3> Total Operating Revenues $1,049,800 $960,414 9.3 Net Income $124,350 $98,414 26.4 Earnings Per Diluted Common Share $2.64 $2.17 21.7 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Dividends Paid Per Common Share $1.20 $1.20 -- Return on Total Assets $4,238,727 $4,022,845 5.4 Year-End Equity Number of Employees (full time) 1,994 2,073 <3.8> 36.4% 20.8% IDACORP, Inc.—Boise, Idaho-based and formed in 1998—is a holding 16.5% 16.1% 13.6% company comprised of Idaho Power Company, a regulated electric 10.7% utility; IDACORP Financial, a holder of affordable housing projects and other real estate investments; and Ida-West Energy, an operator of small hydroelectric generation projects that satisfy the requirements 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. IDACORP’s origins -0.1% -5.6% -13.0% lie with Idaho Power and operations beginning in 1916. Today, Idaho Power employs 1,994 people to serve a 24,000 square-mile service area -25.9% in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Buxton Interim Director Idaho Parks & Recreation
    Susan Buxton Interim Director Idaho Parks & Recreation Betty Mills 0.2616187;0.5;359.2124 Management Assistant Debbie Hoopes Anna Canning Craig Quintana Human Resource Management Services Troy Elmore PIO, Sr. Officer Administrator Operations Administrator Jaime Little Experience & Education Program Supervisor Vacant Keith Jones Admin Assistant 1 Seth Hobbs Adam Zaragoza Natural Resource R&R Program Mgr Development Bureau Manager Kathryn Hampton Chief Chelsea Chambers Vacant Garth Taylor PIS Volunteer Services South Region East Region Coordinator Joel Taylor Bureau Chief Bureau Chief Office Serv Spvsr 2 Nadine Curtis Admin Assistant 1 Lupe Arteaga Matt Linde David Landrum RebeccaNadine Honsinger Curtis Joyce Storey Personnel Tech Ponderosa State Park Admin Assistant 1 1000 Island State Park Admin Assistant 2 Vacant Joel Halfhill Gary Shelley Construction Mgr 1 Construction Mgr 1 James Todd Smith Renee Brennan Theresa Perry Eagle Island SP CSR2 TRS2 Lake Cascade SP Wallace Keck Travis Taylor Joseph Cook Castle Rocks/CIRO Massacre State Parks Building Facility Frmn Roxann Cleverly Laura Wallace Bryce Bealba Surat Nicol Bruneau Dunes SP Kirk Rich Vacant CSR2 CSR2 Lucky Peak State Park Bear Lake State Park Lake Walcott SP Lucas Wingert Construction Mgr 1 Lisa Craig Carlene Kirkland Nita Moses Christopher Re Ricky Thompson Mark Eliot CSR2 CSR2 3 Island State Park Rec Site Maint Frmn Land of the Melanie Schuster Yankee Fork Harriman/Henrys SP Jane Young Arch/Eng Proj Mgr, Sr Drue McCombs OS2 Utility Craftsman Erik Bush Design Professional Erik Ryan Design Professional David White David Claycomb North Region Bureau Chief Rec Bureau Chief Steve Martin Tami Delgado David Dahms Vacant Tom Helmer Sam Hoggatt Chief Financial Officer Admin Assistant 2 Program Supervisor Program Supervisor NM Program Coord.
    [Show full text]
  • FORM 10-K (Mark One)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ................... to ................................................................. Exact name of registrants as specified in Commission their charters, address of principal executive IRS Employer File Number offices, zip code and telephone number Identification Number 1-14465 IDACORP, Inc. 82-0505802 1-3198 Idaho Power Company 82-0130980 1221 W. Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702-5627 (208) 388-2200 State of incorporation: Idaho Name of exchange on SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: which registered IDACORP, Inc.: Common Stock, without par value New York Stock Exchange SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: Idaho Power Company: Preferred Stock Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. IDACORP, Inc. Yes (X) No ( ) Idaho Power Company Yes ( ) No (X) Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. IDACORP, Inc. Yes ( ) No (X) Idaho Power Company Yes ( ) No (X) Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2020 Investor Information
    Bank of America Power, Gas, & Solar Leadership Conference Q4 2020 Investor Information March 2-3, 2021 Forward-Looking Statements In addition to the historical information contained in this presentation, this presentation contains (and oral communications made by IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company may contain) statements, including, without limitation, earnings guidance and estimated key operating and financial metrics, that relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, outlook, assumptions, or future events or performance, often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “guidance,” “intends,” “potential,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “targets,” or similar expressions, are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve estimates, assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results, performance, or outcomes may differ materially from the results discussed in the statements. In addition to any assumptions and other factors and matters referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements
    [Show full text]
  • Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study
    Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study Ralph Myers Project Limnologist Sharon E. Parkinson Principal Engineer Technical Report Appendix E.2.2-4 March 2002 Revised July 2003 Hells Canyon Complex FERC No. 1971 Copyright © 2003 by Idaho Power Company Idaho Power Company Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables...................................................................................................................................ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................ii List of Appendices .........................................................................................................................iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Study Area.................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Plant Operations ......................................................................................................................... 4 4. Methods.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the 1984 Swan Falls Settlement
    UNDERSTANDING THE 1984 SWAN FALLS SETTLEMENT CLIVE J. STRONG & MICHAEL C. ORR FULL CITATION: Clive J. Strong & Michael C. Orr, Understanding the 1984 Swan Falls Settlement, 52 IDAHO L. REV. 223 (2016). This article Copyright © 2016 Idaho Law Review. Except as otherwise expressly provided, permission is hereby granted to photocopy this article for classroom use, provided that: (1) Copies are distributed at or below cost; (2) The author of the article and the Idaho Law Review are properly identified; (3) Proper notice of the copyright is affixed to each copy; and (4) Notice of the use is given to the Idaho Law Review. UNDERSTANDING THE 1984 SWAN FALLS SETTLEMENT CLIVE J. STRONG & MICHAEL C. ORR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 224 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 226 III. THE SWAN FALLS CONTROVERSY AND SETTLEMENT ....................... 230 A. The Lawsuits ............................................................................................ 231 B. The Legislative Subordination Battle ....................................................... 234 C. The Negotiations ...................................................................................... 235 D. The Settlement “Framework” ................................................................... 237 E. The “Trust” Concept ................................................................................. 239
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Falls Power
    INTRODUCTION The first public utility in America began over Although Idaho Falls was not the first community to own and 120 years ago. The efforts of the early electrical operate its municipal utility, it is one of the oldest public power pioneers have allowed the nation’s municipal utilities communities in the Northwest. The city of Idaho Falls is to give inexpensive, reliable electric power to millions celebrating the past 100 years of providing its residents of Americans in the twentieth century. Today municipal ownership in its electric power system. This report municipal utilities give over 2,000 communities a will provide some interesting facts about the pioneers who sense of energy independence and autonomy they can installed a tiny electric generator on an irrigation canal in the carry into the twenty-first century. fall of 1900, establishing the beginning of the Idaho Falls municipal utility. Lucille Keefer pictured in front of the falls, is one of the more endearing images of Idaho Falls’ hydroelectric history. The Pennsylvania-born school teacher was the wife of the project’s construction superintendent. THE CANAL ERA The original 1900 power plant generated electricity from the water tumbling out of an irrigation ditch. When the Utah and Northern Railroad extended its tracks During the 1880s and 1890s, lumberyards, flourmills, to the rapids on the Snake River in 1879, the small town livestock auction houses, newspapers, banks, and clothing of Eagle Rock (now Idaho Falls) was established. The stores sprouted up along the railroad tracks. Population turn of the century not only brought more people to the surged as merchants and professionals flocked to the city to newly formed community but new developments as well.
    [Show full text]
  • (COE1) Comments/Responsens/Attachments U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    Idaho Power Company Responses to Comments U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS—COE1 Hells Canyon Complex Page 1 Responses to Comments Idaho Power Company U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—COE1 Page 2 Hells Canyon Complex Idaho Power Company Responses to Comments U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—COE1 Hells Canyon Complex Page 3 Responses to Comments Idaho Power Company U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—COE1 Page 4 Hells Canyon Complex Idaho Power Company Responses to Comments RESPONSE TO COMMENT COE1-1 Comment noted. Please see Exhibit B for more information regarding IPC’s proposal for flood control requirements in the license application. RESPONSE TO COMMENT COE1-2 The flood control routine incorporated into the CHEOPS operations model uses the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s (ACOE) 1998 modified procedure. This methodology is presented in Exhibit B. The flood control target elevations calculated by the model are based on observed flows through the HCC, providing a theoretical drawdown of Brownlee Reservoir during this period. This theoretical drawdown is not influenced by day-to-day influences or human intervention. By establishing this theoretical operation, other reservoir operation scenario comparisons can be made on a consistent basis. It is not IPC’s intention to change the general flood control requirements for the HCC in the new license. IPC is currently working with Chan Modini of the ACOE’s Hydrologic Engineering Branch (in Portland, OR) to develop an updated flood control article for the new license. The article would be based on the 1998 modified procedure for determining the flood control draft at Brownlee Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Barber Dam Project FERC No. 4881 Pre-Application Document 38
    Barber Dam Project FERC No. 4881 Pre-Application Document Diversion Water Priority Volume Owner Beneficial Uses Rate Right Date (AFA) (cfs) 63-32816 5/1/1866 Irrigation 0.02 -- Esther Simplot and Bernadine Quinn Riverside Parks 63-32350 8/30/1956 Municipal storage -- 560 City of Boise 63-32351 8/30/1956 Municipal storage -- 140 63-32352 8/30/1956 Municipal storage -- 220 Thurman Mill Canal 63-135 6/1/1864 Irrigation 3.3 -- 63-176 6/1/1869 Irrigation 1.6 -- 63-193 6/1/1876 Irrigation 0.44 -- 63-210 6/1/1880 Irrigation 2.4 -- 63-211 10/20/1880 Irrigation 0.9 -- 63-221 6/1/1883 Irrigation 0.9 -- Thurman Mill Ditch Co Aesthetic storage 0.16 -- 63-250 7/1/1895 Diversion to storage -- 23.9 Irrigation 0.5 -- 63-30125 6/1/1865 Irrigation 1.86 -- 63-30129 6/1/1872 Irrigation 2.1 -- 63-30130 6/1/1868 Irrigation 15.48 -- 63-30131 6/1/1882 Irrigation 6 -- Irrigation 2.15 -- 63-192 6/1/1876 Aesthetic storage -- 26.3 Diversion to storage 0.15 -- Irrigation 0.37 -- Warm Springs Ditch 63-216C 6/1/1889 Aesthetic storage -- 4.7 Co. Diversion to storage 0.03 -- Irrigation 4.73 -- 63-19425 6/1/1882 Aesthetic storage -- 57.8 Diversion to storage 0.33 -- Drainage District #4 63-31936 8/13/1925 Irrigation 11.42 -- Farms Union and Boise Valley Canals 63-120G 6/1/1864 Irrigation 1.8 -- 63-123C 6/1/1864 Irrigation 8.4 -- 63-124Q 6/1/1864 Irrigation 0.1 -- 63-125J 6/1/1871 Irrigation 0.26 -- Farmers Union Ditch 63-126F 6/1/1891 Irrigation 0.08 -- Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Star
    0 - 1 2 - 1 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF STAR 13 - 1March 4, 2008 Resolution No. 08-05 Text revisions by Resolution No. 2018-04 13 - 1 13 - 1ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 13 - 1STAR CITY COUNCIL Nathan Mitchell – Mayor 2 - 1Chad Bell – Council President 2 - 1Dustin Christopherson 2 - 1Tammy McDaniel 2 - 1Tom Erlebach 2 - 1 13 - 1 STAR CITY STAFF Cathy Ward-City Clerk/Treasurer Justin Walker- City Engineer, Keller and Associates Shelly Johnson- Building Clerk Kathleen Hutton – Deputy Clerk Mary Shaw Taylor, PZ Director, Present 13 - 1 CONSULTANT M. Jerome Mapp, WRG Design, Inc., Planning Project Manger COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE MEMBERS Kari Rosti Richard Tinsley Brenda Weaver Bob Lenigan Darrel M. Gazzola Tony O’Neil 0-1 City of Star Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Table of Contents City Officials 0-1 List of Tables 0-7 List of Maps and Figures 0-8 Forward and Introduction Vision Statement 0-6 Introduction & Purpose of the Plan 0-10 Goals, Objectives and Implementation/Policies 0-11 Elements of the Comprehensive Plan 0-11 Format for the Comprehensive Plan 0-14 The Planning Area in Perspective 0-14 History of Star 0-14 SECTION 1 - PROPERTY RIGHTS Chapter One - PROPERTY RIGHTS Federal Standards 1-1 State Requirements 1-1 Office of the Attorney General Checklist 1-4 Goals, Objectives and Policies 1-7 0-2 SECTION 2 – GROWTH MANAGEMENT Chapter Two - POPULATION AND GROWTH Population History 2-1 Population Projection 2-2 Household Size and Age Distribution 2-4 Minority Population Distribution 2-5 Summary 2-6 Goals, Objectives
    [Show full text]