Arxiv:2108.08982V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 20 Aug 2021 Luminosities Than the Non-Repeating Ones
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version August 23, 2021 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 Reconciling the 16.35-day period of FRB 20180916B with jet precession Hao-Yan Chen,1 Wei-Min Gu,1 Mouyuan Sun,1 Tong Liu,1 and Tuan Yi1 1Department of Astronomy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, P. R. China (Received XXX; Revised YYY; Accepted ZZZ) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT A repeating fast radio burst (FRB), FRB 20180916B (hereafter FRB 180916), was reported to have a 16.35-day period. This period might be related to a precession period. In this paper, we investigate two precession models to explain the periodic activity of FRB 180916. In both models, the radio emission of FRB 180916 is produced by a precessing jet. For the first disk-driven jet precession model, −8 an extremely low viscous parameter (i.e., the dimensionless viscosity parameter α . 10 ) is required to explain the precession of FRB 180916, which implies its implausibility. For the second tidal force- driven jet precession model, we consider a compact binary consists of a neutron star/black hole and a white dwarf; the white dwarf fills its Roche lobe and mass transfer occurs. Due to the misalignment between the disk and orbital plane, the tidal force of the white dwarf can drive jet precession. We show that the relevant precession periods are several days to hundreds of days, depending on the specific accretion rates and component masses. The duration of FRB 180916 generation in the binary with extremely high accretion rate will be several thousand years. Keywords: Compact binary stars (283)|Jets (870)|Stellar accretion disks (1579)|White dwarf stars (1799)|Radio transient sources (2008) 1. INTRODUCTION Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are mysterious millisecond-duration radio bursts and have been detected in frequencies from 300 MHz (Chawla et al. 2020) to 8 GHz (Gajjar et al. 2018). Recently, Pastor-Marazuela et al.(2020) and Pleunis et al.(2021) observed FRB 20180916B (hereafter FRB 180916) down to 120 MHz. Since the dispersion measure (DM) is more than the contribution of the Galaxy, FRBs are thought to be extragalactic sources (Petroff et al. 2019; Cordes & Chatterjee 2019; Platts et al. 2019). Some host galaxies of FRBs have been identified at redshifts in the range z ≈ 0:03 − 0:66 1, which strongly supports the extragalactic nature of FRBs (e.g., Tendulkar et al. 2017). On April 28, 2020, however, a luminous millisecond radio burst from SGR 1935+2154 (FRB 200428) was observed in the Galaxy (Bochenek et al. 2020; CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. 2020b; Lin et al. 2020; Li et al. 2021). Unlike most FRBs, FRB 200428 has two ∼ 5-ms long sub-bursts separated by ∼ 30 ms (Ridnaia et al. 2021). The number of outbreaks can be used to classify FRBs into two categories, i.e., repeating FRBs and one-off ones. The repeating and non- repeating FRBs differ in several aspects. For example, the repeating FRBs have longer pulse widths and weaker radio arXiv:2108.08982v1 [astro-ph.HE] 20 Aug 2021 luminosities than the non-repeating ones. Meanwhile, the \down-drifting" of frequency and multiple sub-bursts, which seem to be common in the repeating FRBs (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. 2019; Fonseca et al. 2020; Cui et al. 2021), are absent in non-repeating ones. CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al.(2020a) reported the first periodic activity of FRBs, i.e., the source FRB 180916 exhibits an activity period of 16.35 days and has a ∼ 5-day burst window. After that, FRB 121102 was also found to have a ∼ 157-day activity period with a duty cycle of 56 % (Rajwade et al. 2020; Cruces et al. 2021). The discovery of Corresponding author: Wei-Min Gu; Mouyuan Sun [email protected]; [email protected] 1 http://frbhosts.org 2 Chen et al. periodic activities provides important clues for revealing the physical mechanisms of repeating FRBs. It is proposed that the activity period of FRB 180916 might be related to either the orbital or the precession period (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. 2020a). For the orbital period scenario, models involve a neutron star (NS) and white dwarf (WD) binary (Gu et al. 2020), a pulsar passes through the asteroid belt (Dai & Zhong 2020), and a mild pulsar in tight O/B star binary (Lyutikov et al. 2020) are suggested. For the precession scenario, models often invoke the precession of the NS in a black hole (BH)-NS binary system (Yang & Zou 2020), or the free precession of a magnetar (Levin et al. 2020; Tong et al. 2020; Zanazzi & Lai 2020). Note that due to the fast damping caused by the pinning of superfluid vortices inside the star, the long-life free precession of an isolated NS is considered impossible (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. 2020a). There are many other difficulties in the NS model including the energy budget and the strength of the magnetic field (Katz 2020). Katz(2017) suggested that an intermediate-mass BH with chaotic accretion (i.e., the accreting gas has random angular momentum) can produce a wandering jet and the repeating FRBs without periodicity are produced by this jet. Using the disk-driven jet precession model originally proposed by Sarazin et al.(1980), Chen (2020) proposed a young pulsar with debris disk precession to explain the periodic activity of FRB 180916. Then, Katz(2021a) proposed some tests to distinguish different periodic FRB models of the 16.35-day periodicity of FRB 180916. Precession might be a common phenomenon in the Universe. Some active galactic nuclei (AGNs) have long-timescale precession periods, for instance, 3C 196 might have a 106-year precession period (Caproni & Abraham 2004). Moreover, some X-ray binaries also precess and have super-orbital periods (precession periods). For instance, the 162.5-day (e.g., Katz 1980; Sarazin et al. 1980; Katz et al. 1982) and 35-day (Katz 1973) super-orbital periods of SS 433 and Her X-1 are attributed to the precession period. In many binary systems, SS 433 is the most well-studied microquasar in our Galaxy. This X-ray binary contains a compact primary star and an evolved A-type supergiant with a 13.1-day orbital period. A pair of well-collimated jets with velocity ± 0.26c repeat the 162.5-day precession motion. The accretion −4 −1 rate of SS 433 is super-Eddington as ∼ 10 M yr and the secondary star fills its Roche lobe (Fabrika 2004). Some models have been proposed to interpret the precession of SS 433, such as the accretion disk-driven BH and jet precession model (Sarazin et al. 1980), irradiation-driven precession model (Begelman et al. 2006), and the tidal force of the companion star-driven precession model (Leibowitz 1984; Larwood 1998; Li et al. 2020). However, for the irradiation-driven precession model, owing to the absence of external torques, the precession of the disk caused by radiation should be prograde, which would contradict the observation of SS 433 (Maloney et al. 1998). The disk- driven precession model and the tidal force-driven precession model both can cause retrograde precession (Caproni et al. 2006). Ultra-compact X-ray binaries (UCXBs) (Nelemans & Jonker 2010) can also be observed the precession phenomenon in the Galaxy. For example, 47 Tuc X9, a BH-WD binary, has a 6.8-day precession period (Bahramian et al. 2017), and X1916-053, an NS-WD binary, has a 3.8-day precession period. The accretion rates of such systems are lower than the Eddington accretion rate. However, in the state of the unstable and extremely super-Eddington accretion, a compact binary system composed of a BH and a WD (MWD > 0:6 M ) can produce long GRBs (Dong et al. 2018). As the accretion rate declines, the BH-WD binaries might evolve to UCXBs. In this paper, we first show that the jet precession model of Sarazin et al.(1980), i.e., the central engine is a stellar-mass black hole or an intermediate-mass black hole, requires an extremely low dimensionless viscous parameter −8 (α . 10 ); hence we argue that this model is implausible. Then, we propose a compact binary system with a circular 2 orbit, where the primary star is a BH or an NS and the secondary is a WD (MWD < 0:6 M ) . The WD fills its Roche lobe and the mass transfer occurs through the Roche-lobe overflow. The system has a stable and super-Eddington accretion rate. Due to the high accretion rate, a narrowly collimated jet can be formed. The disk and jet will precess together with a 16.35-day precession period. Different from the precession of the NS caused by the coupling of the orbit and spin of the BH-NS binary (Yang & Zou 2020), we consider that the precession of the jet is driven by the tidal force of WD. FRBs can be observed when the jet sweeps across the direction of the observers. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, we test the precession models for the periodic activity of FRB 180916, i.e., the accretion disk-driven jet precession model and the tidal force-driven jet precession model. In Section3, we discuss the properties of the binary system. Conclusions and discussion are presented in Section4. 2 Most recently, NS-WD binaries as repeating FRB central engines were also suggested by Katz(2021b) Precession model for FRB 180916 3 2. THE MODEL 2.1. Accretion Disk-Driven Jet Precession We take SS 433 as an example to introduce the accretion disk-driven jet precession model. SS 433 is an X-ray binary, containing an 8 M spinning BH and a 24 M nondegenerate star (Han & Li 2020).