DOCSLIB.ORG

Research.Pdf (2.097Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research.Pdf (2.097Mb) BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF KATAHDIN SHEEP SELECTED FOR FOOTROT RESISTANCE _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by SAMANEH AZARPAJOUH Dr. Tumen Wuliji and Dr. William R. Lamberson, Dissertation Supervisors DECEMBER 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF KATAHDIN SHEEP SELECTED FOR FOOTROT RESISTANCE presented by Samaneh Azarpajouh, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr.Tumen Wuliji Dr. William Lamberson Dr. Duane Keisler Dr. Tim Safranski Dr. Bruce Shanks Dr. Heide Schatten “Read: In the name of your Lord who created. Who created man from a clinging entity. Read! Your Lord is the most Noble, Who taught by the pen. Who taught man what he did not know.” (Qur’an, 96:1-5) “Call to me and I will answer you, and will tell you great and hidden things that you have not known.” (Jeremiah 33:3) “How great are your works, O Lord, how deep are your thoughts.” (Psalms 92:6) To my beloved family who taught me human excellence is in seeking the truth. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT There are many people that have played an important role over the past several years in helping me reach this point in life. While it is impossible to thank everyone, I would like to express my appreciation to several individuals for their assistance and guidance. I would like to gratefully and sincerely thank my graduate committee, Dr. Tumen Wuliji, Dr. William Lamberson, Dr. Duane Keisler, Dr. Tim Safranski, Dr. Bruce Shanks, and Dr. Heide Schatten for their guidance, patience, knowledge and support throughout my graduate experience. I would like to thank USDA and Lincoln University of Missouri for providing the source of funding for this research project. A special thanks goes to Lincoln University George Washington Carver Farm, Lincoln University of New Zealand and Electron Microscopy Core staff at University of Missouri – Columbia for their assistance to collect data. I must mention Lincoln University Cooperative Research faculty and staff, all the faculty and graduate students at Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri –Columbia for their friendships and assistance. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Ahmadreza Mohamdnia, Dr. Marzieh Mehdizadeh, Dr. Charlotte Clifford-Rathert, Amy Bax, Heather Hilsenbeck, Cindy Thompson, Cindy Borgwordt, and Luke Wilber for their friendship and assistance in all aspects of my program. I have been far from my family in Iran, but have been fortunate to be part of Farley, Rollins and Kaplan families. Thank you for your love and support. The work presented in this dissertation would not have been possible without each and every one of you. Thank you. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. vii ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 4 a. Genetics of disease resistance…………………………………………………………………….4 b. Marker assisted selection……………………………………………………………………………6 c. Footrot in small ruminants…………………………………………………………………………11 d. Etiology of footrot……………………………………………………………………………………..13 e. Footrot scores……………………………………………………………………………………………16 f. Heritability of footrot resistance………………………………………………………………..17 g. Phenotypic and genetic variation in footrot resistance……………………………..19 h. Selection for resistance to footrot……………………………………………………………..21 i. Phenotypic and genetic assessment for resistance to footrot…………………….23 j. Footrot gene-marker screening test…………………………………………………………..24 iii 3. COMPARISON OF SELECTED RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE KATAHDIN SHEEP TO OVINE FOOTROT USING A GENE MARKER SCREENING TEST………………………...26 a. Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………….26 b. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………28 c. Materials and methods…………………………………………………………………………..30 i. Footrot gene marker test (FGMT) screening…………………………….……….30 ii. Footrot lesion scoring, swabbing and bacteria inoculants preparation……………………………………………………………………………………………..…31 iii. Footrot bacteria inoculants preparation……………………………………….….32 iv. Bacteria D. nodosus protease thermostability determination.............33 v. Footrot pathogenic challenge…………………………………………………...........34 vi. White blood cell count………………………………………................................36 vii. Red blood cell count………………...………………………................................37 viii. Packed cell volume (PCV) measurement………………….........................37 ix. WBC differential test……………...………………………...................................38 x. Immune response assay…………...………………………..................................38 d. Statistical analysis ………………………………………………………………………………..…39 e. Results.........................................................................................................39 f. Discussion....................................................................................................42 4. COMPARISON OF WHITE BLOOD CELL PHAGOCYTIC EFFICIENCY IN FOOTROT RESISTANT VS. SUSCEPTIBLE GENOTYPES OF KATAHDIN SHEEP......................55 iv a. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………......55 b. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………56 c. Materials and methods…………………………………………………………………………..58 d. Results........................................................................................................61 e. Discussion...................................................................................................63 5. COMPARISON OF ULTRASTRUCTURAL CHANGES CAUSED BY DICHELOBACTER NODOSUS IN STRATUM CORNEUM OF HOOF TISSUE OF SHEEP .....................71 a. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………......71 b. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………72 c. Materials and methods…………………………………………………………………………..74 d. Results.........................................................................................................75 e. Discussion....................................................................................................76 6. GENERAL DISCUSSION............................................................................................83 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................ 87 VITA ................................................................................................................................. 101 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Footrot scores by hoof color, gene marker (low, medium and high resistance) and breed in treatment (D) group ............................................................................. 52 2. Average RBC count, WBC count, and PCV in C and D groups at the beginning (CB and DB) and the end of trial (CE and DE) ........................................................... 53 3. WBC differential count in C and D groups at the beginning (CB and DB) and the end of trial (CE and DE) ....................................................................................... 54 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Comparison of average body condition score at the beginning (BCS1) and the end (BCS2) of trial between control (C) and treatment(D) groups ........................... 46 2. Comparison of average body weight at the beginning (WT1) and the end (WT2) of trial between control (C) and treatment (D) groups .......................................... 47 3. Comparison of IgG level in sera between control (C) and treatment (D) groups ... 48 4. Clear zones of proteolysis around inoculated wells with D. nodosus in the gelatin test before incubation ........................................................................................ 49 5. Clear zones of proteolysis around inoculated wells with D. nodosus in the gelatin test 8 min incubation .......................................................................................... 50 6. Clear zones of proteolysis around inoculated wells with D. nodosus in the gelatin test 16 min incubation ........................................................................................ 51 7. Comparison of the numbers of bacterial colonies after addition of neutrophils and incubation periods in the low resistant gene marker group vs. the high resistant gene marker group ............................................................................................. 68 8. Comparison of the numbers of bacterial colonies after addition of neutrophils and incubation periods in ewes vs. rams .................................................................. 69 9. Comparison of the number of bacterial colonies after addition of neutrophils and after 20,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sites of Persistence of Fusobacterium Necrophorum and Dichelobacter Nodosus Clifton, Rachel; Giebel, Katharina; Liu, Nicola L.B.H.; Purdy, Kevin; Green, Laura E
    University of Birmingham Sites of persistence of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus Clifton, Rachel; Giebel, Katharina; Liu, Nicola L.B.H.; Purdy, Kevin; Green, Laura E. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50822-9 License: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Clifton, R, Giebel, K, Liu, NLBH, Purdy, K & Green, LE 2019, 'Sites of persistence of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus: a paradigm shift in understanding the epidemiology of footrot in sheep', Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, 14429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50822-9 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbiome of the Footrot Lesion in Merino Sheep Is Characterized by a Persistent Bacterial Dysbiosis T ⁎ Andrew S
    Veterinary Microbiology 236 (2019) 108378 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Veterinary Microbiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetmic The microbiome of the footrot lesion in Merino sheep is characterized by a persistent bacterial dysbiosis T ⁎ Andrew S. McPherson, Om P. Dhungyel, Richard J. Whittington Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Rd, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Footrot is prevalent in most sheep-producing countries; the disease compromises sheep health and welfare and Footrot has a considerable economic impact. The disease is the result of interactions between the essential causative Merino agent, Dichelobacter nodosus, and the bacterial community of the foot, with the pasture environment and host Sheep resistance influencing disease expression. The Merino, which is the main wool sheep breed in Australia, is Microbiome particularly susceptible to footrot. We characterised the bacterial communities on the feet of healthy and footrot- Dichelobacter nodosus affected Merino sheep across a 10-month period via sequencing and analysis of the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Distinct bacterial communities were associated with the feet of healthy and footrot- affected sheep. Infection with D. nodosus appeared to trigger a shift in the composition of the bacterial com- munity from predominantly Gram-positive, aerobic taxa to predominantly Gram-negative, anaerobic taxa. A total of 15 bacterial genera were preferentially abundant on the feet of footrot-affected sheep, several of which have previously been implicated in footrot and other mixed bacterial diseases of the epidermis of ruminants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Fimbrial Antigens of Dichelobacter Nodosus in Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Footrot
    The role of fimbrial antigens of Dichelobacter nodosus in diagnosis and pathogenesis of footrot. Om Prakash Dhungyel A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Sydney Australia March 2002 Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Sydney i Declaration Apart from the assistance stated in the acknowledgments and where reference is made in the text this thesis represents the original work of the author. The studies presented here have not been submitted for any other degree or diploma at any other university. Om Prakash Dhungyel BVSc&AH, MScVet Sc March 2002 ii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my mother late Mrs. Chandrakala Dhungyel whose dedication for the welfare of animals led me into veterinary education, and to my parents and to one and all members of my large family who have been the main source of inspiration in my endeavour. iii Acknowledgments I am profoundly indebted to my supervisor, Emeritus Professor John Egerton and Associate supervisor, Professor Richard Whittington for their thorough guidance and help in every aspect of this study. Their dedicated and friendly help was one of the main sources of inspiration for me to complete this study on time. I am grateful to Dr. Peter Cox of Sydney Waters for his initial help with the design of serogroup specific PCR primers and providing me with the fimbrial sequences. My grateful thanks to Professor Julian Rood and Dr. Ruth Kennan of Monash University for the collaboration in one of the studies presented in this thesis. I am grateful to Assoc. Prof. Garry Cross for helping me with the photographs and all the other computer problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Study of the Ovine Foot 16S Rrna-Based Microbiome
    The ISME Journal (2011) 5, 1426–1437 & 2011 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/11 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ovine pedomics: the first study of the ovine foot 16S rRNA-based microbiome Leo A Calvo-Bado1, Brian B Oakley2,5, Scot E Dowd3, Laura E Green1,5, Graham F Medley1, Atiya Ul-Hassan1, Vicky Bateman1, William Gaze1, Luci Witcomb1, Rose Grogono-Thomas4, Jasmeet Kaler1, Claire L Russell4 and Elizabeth MH Wellington1 1School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; 2USDA ARS, Richard Russell Research Center, 950 College Station Rd Athens, GA, USA; 3Research and Testing Laboratory, Lubbock, TX, USA and 4School of Clinical Veterinary, University of Bristol, Langford, UK We report the first study of the bacterial microbiome of ovine interdigital skin based on 16S rRNA by pyrosequencing and conventional cloning with Sanger-sequencing. Three flocks were selected, one a flock with no signs of footrot or interdigital dermatitis, a second flock with interdigital dermatitis alone and a third flock with both interdigital dermatitis and footrot. The sheep were classified as having either healthy interdigital skin (H) and interdigital dermatitis (ID) or virulent footrot (VFR). The ovine interdigital skin bacterial community varied significantly by flock and clinical condition. The diversity and richness of operational taxonomic units was greater in tissue from sheep with ID than H or VFR-affected sheep. Actinobacteria, Bacteriodetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla comprising 25 genera. Peptostreptococcus, Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus were associated with H, ID and VFR, respectively. Sequences of Dichelobacter nodosus, the causal agent of ovine footrot, were not amplified because of mismatches in the 16S rRNA universal forward primer (27F).
    [Show full text]
  • Dichelobacter Nodosus, the Causal Agent of Ovine Footrot
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/97645 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Persistence of Dichelobacter nodosus, the causal agent of ovine footrot By Katharina Giebel A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Life Sciences University of Warwick June 2017 Table of contents Acknowledgements i Declaration ii Summary iii List of figures iv List of tables viii Abbreviations xii CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1 1.1 Ovine footrot and its impact on economy and health and welfare of sheep 1 1.2 Global footrot prevalence and prevalence of lameness in the United Kingdom 1 1.3 Disease expression and epidemiology 3 1.4 Treatment of footrot 4 1.5 Characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus 5 1.5.1 Main virulence factors of Dichelobacter nodosus 6 1.5.2 Benign and virulent strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in sheep populations 8 1.5.3 Antigenic diversity of Dichelobacter nodosus 8 1.6 The role of climate and environment in footrot initiation, severity and elimination 10 1.6.1 The environment in disease initiation and transmission of footrot 10 1.6.2
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Prescribing Guidelines for Sheep
    Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for sheep Acknowledgements Funding for these guidelines was provided by the Australian Veterinary Association (AVA), Animal Medicines Australia (AMA), Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA), Sheep Producers Australia (SPA), Wool Producers Australia (WPA), and Animal Health Australia (AHA). These guidelines would not have been possible without the considerable expertise and efforts of the Expert Panel authors: Dr Ray Batey, Dr Paul Nilon, Dr Stephen Page, Professor Jacqueline Norris, and Professor Glenn Browning. Additional in-kind contributions were made by the Australian Veterinary Association, Animal Medicines Australia, and NSW Department of Primary Industries. The work of Project Manager Dr Amanda Black is gratefully acknowledged, as are the contributions of the project Steering Committee members Dr John Messer, Dr Phillip McDonagh, Professor James Gilkerson, and Dr Melanie Latter. Foreword Foreword – antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for sheep These practical guidelines for Australian sheep Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global veterinarians are designed to be a useful resource. threat that presents a serious risk to human and They have been developed specifically for the animal health. Resistance to antimicrobials occurs Australian sheep industry and contain best-practice naturally in microorganisms. But it can be amplified by information to help clinical veterinarians make antimicrobial overuse, underuse, or poor management. appropriate decisions when prescribing antimicrobials.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing Footrot in Sheep
    Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry Volume 6 | Issue 4 ISSN: 2348-9790 Review Article Open Access Reviewing Footrot in Sheep Caetano P*1,2, Bettencourt EV1,2 and Branco S1,2 1Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal 2Instituto de Ciência Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Évora, Portugal *Corresponding author: Caetano P, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal, Tel: 00351968440987, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Caetano P, Bettencourt EV, Branco S (2018) Reviewing Footrot in Sheep. J Vet Sci Ani Husb 6(4): 405 Received Date: May 25, 2018 Accepted Date: October 24, 2018 Published Date: October 26, 2018 Abstract Ovine footrot is the main cause of lameness in sheep around the world and is responsible for extensive economic and welfare impacts. It can be an extremely contagious disease, resulting from the invasion of the interdigital tissue by a complex mixture of bacteria, in which Dichelobacter nodosus is a required component. Strains of D. nodosus can be benign or virulent, but they are not always related with the clinical expression of footrot, complicating the diagnostic process. Several efforts have been made over recent decades to control the disease, but it remains endemic in the major sheep-raising countries of the world. The use of more efficient therapeutic procedures and better farm management practices or the development of new selective breeding tools and strategic vaccination protocols are some of the key measures that may improve footrot control in the future. Keywords: Ovine footrot; Sheep; Dichelobacter nodosus Introduction Ovine footrot is a contagious disease affecting the feet of sheep and other ruminants and presents in two different forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Characterization of Dichelobacter Nodosus from Sheep with Different Clinical Manifestations of Ovine Footrot
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA VEGETAL Detection and characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus from sheep with different clinical manifestations of Ovine Footrot Catarina Almeida de Albuquerque Mestrado em Biologia Molecular e Genética Dissertação orientada por: Doutora Ana Botelho Prof.ª Doutora Mónica V. Cunha 2019 This Dissertation was fully performed at Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I. P. (INIAV) under the direct supervision of Dr. Ana Botelho. Professor Mónica V. Cunha was the internal supervisor designated in the scope of the Master in Molecular Biology and Genetics of the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon. Agradecimentos Este último ano esteve repleto de novas experiências e todas contribuíram para que aprendesse a adaptar-me, afetando-me como pessoa de formas que eu tenho certeza terão um papel essencial no resto da minha vida, tanto profissional como pessoalmente. Este ano ensinou-me a verdadeira importância do trabalho de equipa na investigação. As pessoas que me acompanharam durante este processo (e as lições que com elas aprendi) foram essenciais durante esta etapa da minha vida e gostaria, por isso, agora de lhes agradecer. Gostaria, primeiro que tudo, de agradecer à minha orientadora de tese, Doutora Ana Botelho, acima de tudo por me ter oferecido esta oportunidade de desenvolver a tese a seu cargo e por me receber no seu departamento no INIAV, bem como por todo o apoio e aconselhamento que me concedeu. Agradeço também à Professora Doutora Mónica Cunha, a minha orientadora interna, pela disponibilidade e orientação. Também gostaria de agradecer à Doutora Sandra Cavaco por me dar confiança no laboratório, pela ajuda e pelos conselhos.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Comparison of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection Of
    Frosth et al. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2012, 54:6 http://www.actavetscand.com/content/54/1/6 RESEARCH Open Access Development and comparison of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Dichelobacter nodosus with culturing and conventional PCR: harmonisation between three laboratories Sara Frosth1*, Jannice S Slettemeås2, Hannah J Jørgensen2, Øystein Angen3 and Anna Aspán1 Abstract Background: Ovine footrot is a contagious disease with worldwide occurrence in sheep. The main causative agent is the fastidious bacterium Dichelobacter nodosus. In Scandinavia, footrot was first diagnosed in Sweden in 2004 and later also in Norway and Denmark. Clinical examination of sheep feet is fundamental to diagnosis of footrot, but D. nodosus should also be detected to confirm the diagnosis. PCR-based detection using conventional PCR has been used at our institutes, but the method was laborious and there was a need for a faster, easier-to-interpret method. The aim of this study was to develop a TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay for detection of D. nodosus and to compare its performance with culturing and conventional PCR. Methods: A D. nodosus-specific TaqMan based real-time PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene was designed. The inclusivity and exclusivity (specificity) of the assay was tested using 55 bacterial and two fungal strains. To evaluate the sensitivity and harmonisation of results between different laboratories, aliquots of a single DNA preparation were analysed at three Scandinavian laboratories. The developed real-time PCR assay was compared to culturing by analysing 126 samples, and to a conventional PCR method by analysing 224 samples. A selection of PCR-products was cloned and sequenced in order to verify that they had been identified correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Detection and Identification of Mixed Strains of Fusobacterium Necrophorum in Foot Rot Lesions of Sheep in Kashmir, India
    Open Access Austin Immunology Review Article The Detection and Identification of Mixed Strains of Fusobacterium necrophorum in Foot Rot Lesions of Sheep in Kashmir, India Farooq S1*, Wani SA2, Hassan MN3, Aalamgeer S2, Kashoo ZA2, Magray SN2 and Bhat MA4 Abstract 1KVK-Kupwara, Sher-e-Kashmir University of The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir identification of lktA variant strains of F. necrophorum in the foot rot lesions of (SKUAST-K), India sheep. The detection of F. necrophorum was carried out by Polymerase Chain 2Division of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Reaction (PCR) targeting the leukotoxin (lktA) gene fragment and identification SKUAST-K, India of lktA variant strains was done by PCR–Single Stranded Conformational 3KVK-Nyoma, SKUAST-K, India Polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and gene sequencing of the 450 swabs collected 4Division of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, from foot rot lesions of sheep, 117 were positive for F. necrophorum of the Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and 50 swabs collected from apparently asymptomatic sheep, only one was Technology of Jammu (SKUAST-J), India positive for F. necrophorum. The overall prevalence of F. necrophorum in foot *Corresponding author: Shaheen Farooq, Subject rot affected sheep in Kashmir valley was 26%, with the highest prevalence of Matter Specialist (Animal Science), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, 34.8% recorded in samples from the districts of Kulgam and Pulwama, and the Kupwara, India lowest (20%) in Baramulla district. PCR-SSCP of lktA gene fragment revealed the presence of three lktA variants, designated as JKS-F1/ F2/ F3, while two Received: March 01, 2018; Accepted: March 21, 2018; samples (1.70%) showed the presence of multiple lktA variant strains of F.
    [Show full text]
  • Dichelobacter Nodosus and Footrot in Swedish Sheep
    Dichelobacter nodosus and Footrot in Swedish Sheep Increased Knowledge and Improved Laboratory Diagnostics Sara Frosth Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2016 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2016:112 Cover: A Finnsheep by the river Ljusnan in Järvsö. Photo: Sara Frosth (2016). ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-576-8727-2 ISBN (electronic version) 978-91-576-8728-9 © 2016 Sara Frosth, Uppsala Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2016 Dichelobacter nodosus and Footrot in Swedish Sheep. Increased Knowledge and Improved Laboratory Diagnostics Abstract Ovine footrot is a contagious bacterial disease primarily caused by Dichelobacter nodosus. Footrot affects the feet of sheep and is characterised by two major clinical presentations. The milder form consists of inflammation confined to the interdigital space (interdigital dermatitis or benign footrot) and the more severe form includes underrunning of the hoof horn (underrunning or virulent footrot). Disease severity is dependent on several factors including the virulence of the D. nodosus strain, environmental conditions, farming practices, host susceptibility, and co-infecting bacteria. In Sweden, ovine footrot was first diagnosed in 2004, but fast and sensitive diagnostics for D. nodosus were not available. Likewise, knowledge was missing about the D. nodosus strains and co-infection with other lameness-associated bacteria. Hence the overall aim of this thesis project was to increase the knowledge about ovine footrot in Swedish sheep and to improve laboratory diagnostics for it. In this thesis project, sensitive and specific real-time PCR methods to detect and discriminate between virulent and benign strains of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Dichelobacter Nodosus and Fusobacterium Necrophorum in Ruminants with Lameness and Footrot
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum in ruminants with lameness and footrot A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by G. N. Bennett Lincoln University 2011 ii Declaration of parts of thesis that have been accepted for publication Chapter 2 Bennett G., Hickford J.G., Sedcole R., Zhou H., 2009(a). Dichelobacter nodosus, Fusobacterium necrophorum and the epidemiology of footrot. Anaerobe 15, 173-6. Bennett G., van Loenen A., Hickford J.G., Sedcole R., Zhou H., 2009(b). Dichelobacter nodosus, Fusobacterium necrophorum and the epidemiology of footrot in goats. Anaerobe 15, 177. Chapter 5 Bennett G., Hickford J.G., Zhou H., Laporte J., Gibbs J., 2009(c). Detection of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus in lame cattle on dairy farms in New Zealand. Res. Vet. Sci. 87, 413-5. Chapter 6 Zhou H., Bennett G., Hickford J.G., 2009(a). Variation in Fusobacterium necrophorum strains present on the hooves of footrot infected sheep, goats and cattle.
    [Show full text]