Signaturtlo~Ej1~ S -F+Pl) ~1,7/'15

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signaturtlo~Ej1~ S -F+Pl) ~1,7/'15 NPS Form 10-900 OM6 No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States 'c"'~i'"'~rn,~nt of the Interior National Park Servic2 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and distric!s. See inslruc:ions in How to Complere the National Register of Histone Places Regisrrarion Form (National Register Builetin 16A). Complete eacn item by marKing "x" in the aDproDriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "NIX' for "not aDplicable." For func:lons. architectural classification. materials. and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place adaitional entries ana narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-9OOa). Use a typewriter. word processor. or computer. to complete all items. historic name __--=s:....:t=-=-. _N:..:d:.::a:..::r:..::k~'.::..S--=E::..J.P_l.::..· s..:...,..:c_o-'-p_a_l_..:.C_h_u_r_c __ h _______________________ _ other names/site number ___________________________________ street & number __~2~O~4~S~.~K~l~·n~g~S~t~r~e~e~t~ ________________~N/~ not for publication city or town ____.::.::H.::::a.::::l.::::i.::::f.::::a:=.:x~ ____________________~~=_·;!,...;I-:..::.A_ C vicinity state North Carolina code NC cou nty _H=c=.l.=.i=-f a=.:?:..::.." _____ code OE3 zip code 27839 As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended. I hereby CerliTy that this ~ nomination '= request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standarcs for registering properlies in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and proiessional requirements set forth in 36 CFM Part 60. In my opinion. the properlY [K; meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considerec Significant Q nati~Y 0 statewide !Xi locally. (0 See continuation sheet lor additional comments.) Signaturtlo~eJ1~ S -f+pl) ~1,7/'15 State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. (~ See continua!:cn sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying officiallTitle Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Signature of the Kee;;er Daie of Action o entered in the National Register. o See continuation sheet. [J determined eligible for the National Register o See continuation sheet. o determined not e!iglble for the National Register. C re'7loved from the National Reg:sier. o other, (explain) ______ St. Mark's Episcopal Church Halifax County. NC Name of Property County and State QllteglOry of gll'lf\l"Y:l,riv Number of .--o""';;::MJ'UN (Check as many boxes as apply) one (Do not include previously listed resources count.) IX! private [Xl building(s) Contributing Noncontributing o public-local o district _--=1_______ --=.1 ______ buildings o public-State o site o public-Federal o structure _________________ sites o object _________________ structures ________________ objects __1________ 1______ Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Aeolster N/A o Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Religion/religious facility Religion/religious facility Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Gothic Revival foundation __b=r..::::i:...::;c...::,;k'--- _____________ walls wood concrete block roof asphal t other wood Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) St. Mark's Episcopal Church Halifax County, NC Name of Property County and Stale Aegls,ter Criteria of Significance "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) National Register listing.) Architecture lXl A Property is associated with events that have made Religion a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. o B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. [Xl C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1855-1947 o 0 Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) 1855 Property is: 1925-1928 ~ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person o B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A DCa birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation o 0 a cemetery. N/A o E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. o F a commemorative property. o G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Frederick FitzGerald Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Bihilography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: o preliminary determination of individual listing (36 tJ State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested o Other State agency o previously listed in the National Register o Federal agency o previously determined eligible by the National o Local government Register o University designated a National Historic Landmark o Other o recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: #_--------- o recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # _________ St. Mark's Episcopal Church Halifax County, NC Name of Property County and State Ai ""ll"a~'l"!IlI:IA of 1IdJ1I",f\/n,c.lI"!I'u __...:::°..::;n:...::e=--:...::h.:..;a=-:l=-f=--.=a...:::c:..::r:...;:e=-- _____ UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) Zone Easting Northing Easting Northing 2W I I I I I I I I o See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) name/title __D_r_u_c_l_·l_l_a_H_o_Y_o_r_k _____________________________ _ organization Local History Associates date November 26, 1997 street & number 2001 E. Fifth Street telephone (919) 752 - 5260 city or town _---=G...:::r-=e:...::e=-=.n::....:vc...:;i=l=l:::..e=--_____________ state _---=..;.N-=-C ___ zip code 27858 Continuation Sheets A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) name_~T:::..h==e-=E~p~i~s~c~o_p~a_l_D_i_o_c_e_s_e__ o_f_N_o_r_t_h __ C_a_r_o_l_i_n_a ______________________ _ street & number _-=-2.::...0=1-=S-=t~.-=A=lc.=.b...:::a:.::.;n'-'....:;:s;........::D'-r_i_v'-e _______ _ telephone (919) 787-6313 city or town ___-=.R=a=l:..;:e=i::...:;g=h-=-- _____________ state _--=..;N.-;:.C ___ zip code 27619-7025 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C, 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. St. Mark's Episcopal Church Halifax, Halifax County, NC 7 1 7 • Narrative Deseri ion Situated in the small courthouse town of Halifax in Halifax County, St. Mark's Episcopal Church, a small, board-and-batten, Carpenter Gothic building, faces east onto King Street, the town's primary thoroughfare, and sits on the southwest corner lot of the intersection of Church and King streets. This one-half acre of land was originally a part of lAThe Grove" plantation, and its owner, Mrs. Eppes, conveyed it in 1854 to the church as a gift with the stipulation that it be used only for the church and never a cemetery.l The town's early development began to the north near the Roanoke River with growth extending in a southern direction. By the mid­ nineteenth century, the town was beginning to encroach upon liThe Grove," which offered a desirable and more economical site for the new church. Today, the church stands within a predominately residential area in close proximity to two other churches on King Street and the commercial district. Centrally placed on the site, this simple board-and-batten Carpenter Gothic church, completed in 1855, stands approximately twenty-five feet from the street. A side walk extends along King Street, and a low brick wall separates it from the church grounds. This wall also frames the lot's boundaries along the northeast and southwest sides. A brick walk leads up to the front entrance and then branches to each side and extends along the side elevations to the entrances into the vestry room and sacristy, at the north and south respectively. Directly behind the church and connected by a covered walk is a modest cinder-block parish hall constructed in 1957.
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Convention
    Journal of Convention The Episcopal Diocese of East Carolina 2015 INTERDIOCESAN INSTITUTIONS THE UNIVERSITY of the SOUTH Sewanee, Tennessee 37383 919-598-1000 SAINT MARY’S SCHOOL 900 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-424-4100 THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS 6000 Saint Peter’s Lane Matthews, North Carolina 28105 704-536-0375 SAINT AUGUSTINE’S COLLEGE 1315 Oakwood Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 919-516-4000 KANUGA CONFERENCES, INC. 130 Kanuga Chapel Drive Hendersonville, North Carolina 28739 828-692-9136 ii JOURNAL OF THE ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF EAST CAROLINA IN NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA FEBRUARY 6 and 7, 2015 Including the Constitution, Canons and Rules of Order Charter and By-laws of the Episcopal Foundation iii Table of Contents Table of Contents Mission Statement......................................................................................1 Directory of the Diocese.............................................................................2 Diocesan House Staff................................................................................12 Directory of Churches..............................................................................13 Canonical Listing of Clergy.....................................................................29 Necrology...................................................................................................36 List of Lay Delegates................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopate in America
    4* 4* 4* 4 4> m amenta : : ^ s 4* 4* 4* 4 4* ^ 4* 4* 4* 4 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES GIFT OF Commodore Byron McCandless THe. UBKARY OF THE BISHOP OF SPRINGFIELD WyTTTTTTTTTTTT*'fW CW9 M IW W W> W W W W9 M W W W in America : : fTOfffiWW>fffiWiW * T -r T T Biographical and iiogtapl)icai, of tlje Bishops of tije American Ciwrct), toitl) a l&reliminarp Cssap on tyt Historic episcopate anD 2Documentarp Annals of tlje introduction of tl)e Anglican line of succession into America William of and Otstortogmpljrr of tljr American * IW> CW tffi> W ffi> ^W ffi ^ ^ CDttfon W9 WS W fW W <W $> W IW W> W> W> W c^rtjStfan Hitetatute Co, Copyright, 1895, BY THE CHRISTIAN LITERATURE COMPANY. CONTENTS. PAGE ADVERTISEMENT vii PREFACE ix INTRODUCTION xi BIOGRAPHIES: Samuel Seabury I William White 5 Samuel Provoost 9 James Madison 1 1 Thomas John Claggett 13 Robert Smith 15 Edward Bass 17 Abraham Jarvis 19 Benjamin Moore 21 Samuel Parker 23 John Henry Hobart 25 Alexander Viets Griswold 29 Theodore Dehon 31 Richard Channing Moore 33 James Kemp 35 John Croes 37 Nathaniel Bowen 39 Philander Chase 41 Thomas Church Brownell 45 John Stark Ravenscroft 47 Henry Ustick Onderdonk 49 William Meade 51 William Murray Stone 53 Benjamin Tredwell Onderdonk 55 Levi Silliman Ives 57 John Henry Hopkins 59 Benjamin Bosworth Smith 63 Charles Pettit Mcllvaine 65 George Washington Doane 67 James Hervey Otey 69 Jackson Kemper 71 Samuel Allen McCoskry .' 73 Leonidas Polk 75 William Heathcote De Lancey 77 Christopher Edwards Gadsden 79 iii 956336 CONTENTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Catholicism in Antebellum North Carolina: Levi Silliman Ives and the Society of the Holy Cross
    Anglo-Catholicism in Antebellum North Carolina: Levi Silliman Ives and the Society of the Holy Cross By Lewis Wright He has instituted at Valle Crucis a monastic order . composed of persons bound to him by a vow of celibacy, poverty and obedience. He has given to the members, as their peculiar dress, a black cassock extending from the throat to the ankle. He allows to be placed on the altar a pyx, in which are reserved the remaining consecrated elements after a communion . there is used at Valle Crucis in a little manual of devotions . prayers to the Virgin Mary and the Saints. He has announced to two of his clergy an intention to send a “penitentiary” through the parishes in the Diocese to receive the confessions of the people.1 THESE CRITICISMS of the Rt. Rev. Levi Silliman Ives (1797-1867), bishop of North Carolina, were made in 1849 by George Edmond Badger, a prominent layman, lawyer and United States senator from Raleigh, North Carolina. Several accounts have been written of the life of Bishop Ives, a cradle Presbyterian who converted to the Episcopal Church. Ives served as the second bishop of North Carolina (1831-1852) and spent the last fifteen years of his life as a Roman Catholic layman (1852-1867).2 These accounts have included few details of the Society of the Holy Cross and of the bishop’s beloved mission-monastery outpost in the wilderness of the North Carolina mountains, which he called Valle Crucis Abbey.3 On an evening in late October or early November, 1847, at St.
    [Show full text]
  • One Great Fellowship of Love? Theological Convictions & Ecclesial Realities in the Racial History of the Diocese of North Carolina
    One great fellowship of love? Theological convictions & ecclesial realities in the racial history of the Diocese of North Carolina Address delivered to the Annual Convention of the Diocese The Rev. Dr. Brooks Graebner, Historiographer November 16, 2017 In Christ there is no East or West, in him no South or North, but one great fellowship of love, throughout the whole wide earth. John Oxenham [The Hymnal 1982, #529] Our diocesan racial history interweaves two strands. One is our proclamation that a Church claiming to be “One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic” must make no room for racial exclusion; it’s incompatible with who we believe Christ to be, and it violates the nature of the community he came to create. Both black and white Episcopalians have embraced that core conviction and sought to live by it. The other strand is the willingness of white members of our church to countenance exclusionary and unjust practices, to minimize their ongoing impact, and to remain apathetic. This willingness has compromised our efforts to minister with African Americans, and left us ill-prepared to heed the call to racial justice. All three antebellum bishops of our diocese—John Stark Ravenscroft, Levi Silliman Ives, and Thomas Atkinson—were vigorous promoters of slave evangelization, and they did not hesitate publicly to commend those members of the church, lay and clergy, who embraced this work.1 They were especially solicitous of slaveholders who made provision for such ministrations by building plantation chapels and engaging minsters to do catechetical work with the enslaved population. In this regard, Bishop Ives’ report of his 1846 visitation to New Bern 1 John Hope Frankin, “Negro Episcopalians in Ante-bellum North Carolina” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church XIII.3 (September 1944) 216-234.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH in NORTH CAROLINA 1587-2015 Historical Overview the Rev
    THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN NORTH CAROLINA 1587-2015 Historical Overview The Rev. Dr. N. Brooks Graebner Historiographer, Diocese of North Carolina The story of the Episcopal Church in North Carolina can be traced back to the very first English efforts at colonization during the reign of Elizabeth I. In August 1587, at what is now called “the Lost Colony” on Roanoke Island, the Native American Manteo and the English infant Virginia Dare were baptized. Permanent English settlement did not occur until the mid-17th century, however, and it wasn’t until 1701 that the colonial assembly passed its first Vestry Act, thereby making the Church of England the officially sanctioned faith in North Carolina. This act provided for the creation of precincts – or parishes – administered by local vestries, and the precincts of Chowan, Pasquotank, Perquimans, and Currituck along Albemarle Sound and Pamlico precinct in Bath County date to this time. Principally through levying taxes and fines, colonial vestries in each parish were called upon to make provision for church buildings and ministers, oversee the parish poor, and serve other delegated political functions.1 Thus, the Church of England enjoyed a privileged status and legal advantages not enjoyed by other religious groups in 18th century North Carolina. But these legal provisions by no means guaranteed a strong and vibrant Church, and the history of Colonial Anglicanism in North Carolina is largely a study in frustration. From the outset, many inhabitants were at best indifferent—and often opposed—to the establishment of the Church of England. Already in the late 17th century, the region around Albemarle Sound had become a haven for Quakers, who launched a campaign to have the vestry act repealed.2 And in 1 Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopal Manual
    Clnivcr^Uv DURRETT COLLECTION " : :: : w$^Sii^^; S : : ' : ; - ^ i"! -' ??*&: '3^ :\- *?.'. THE : EPISCOPAL,> MANUAL o A SUMMARY DOCTRINE, DISGI^raE, AND PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH, IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. " ft WITH AN APPENDIX. ; BY THE LATE7 REV. WILLIAM H. WILMER, D.D. U " Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest' for your souls." JEREMIAH, vi. 16. NEW AND IMPROVED EDITION. REVISED AND ADAPTED TO THE PRESENT STATE OP THE CHURCH. WITH CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONS AND EMENDATIONS. PHILADELPHIA: PUBLISHED BY R. S. H. GEORGE, SOUTH FIFTH STREET. 1841. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1841, by R. S. H. GEORGE, in the Clerk's office of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. C. Sherman & Co. Printers, 19 St. James Street. O- EDITOR'S PREFACE. THE " EPISCOPAL MANTJAI,," by the late Rev. Dr. Wilmer, has long been highly and justly esteemed by the members of oux Church, as a brief, yet comprehensive and instructive exposition of its Ministry, Doctrines, Discipline, and Worship. We have many able works on the Consti- tution and external order of the Church, and numerous ex- cellent treatises on doctrinal and practical religion ; but a work devoted to the united interests of the Gospel and the Church to the defence of both evangelical truth, and apostolical order;-* as it had long been a desideratum before the appearance of the admirable compendium now pre- sented to the public in a revised, and, it is hoped, improved it will form ; so probably not soon be superseded in ge- neral estimation by any similar publication.
    [Show full text]
  • O F T H E __ H O L-.:Y~ T R I N L · T.:-,Y______
    NPS Form 10-900 OMS No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United n"" ... ""rl"'-'"",V"IIt 01 the Interior National Park Service This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "N/A" for "not appiicable." For functions. architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name ____c_h_u_r_c_h __ o_f_t_h_e __ H_o_l-.:y~_T_r_i_n_l_· _t.:-,y_______________________ _ other names/site number ____________________________________ street & number __2__ 07~S_._C_h_u_r_c_h_S_t_r_e_e_t _____________ __~_~~/~A- ~ not for publication city or town ____H_e_r_t_f_o_r_d _____________________N-o.:/_A __ [J vicinity state __N_o_r_t_h_C_a_r_o_l_i_n_a __ _ code ~ county __P_e_r----"o_u-"i_I!l_a_n_s-=-- ____ code ~ zip code 27944 As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended, I hereby certify that this ~ nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and profeSSional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property IR! meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant o nationally 0 statewide iii locally.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Luke's Episcopal Church, 1753-1953
    DUKE UNIVERSITY DIVINITY SCHOOL LIBRARY ( Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/stlukesepiscopalOOpowe EPISCOPAL CHURCH 1753 — 1953 ST. LUKE S EPISCOPAL CHURCH EPISCOPAL CHURCH 1753 1953 By William S. Powell Salisbury, N. C. St. Luke's Episcopal Church 1953 Copyright 1953 By William Stevens Powell Div.S. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To the Rev. W. Moultrie Moore, Jr., I owe thanks for first encouraging me in my efforts to make a study of the history of St. Luke's. His faith in my ability persuaded the Vestry to set aside funds several years ago for publishing my findings in this form. In addition to him, two other former rectors, the Rev. Thaddeus A. Cheatham and the Rev. Edward B. Guerry, and the present rector, the Rev. Thorn W. Blair, have assisted me in various ways. Manuscript and printed source material was readily made avail- able to me by Miss Anne Hobson, parish secretary; Miss Mar- garet Bell, custodian of many of the records compiled by Dr. Murdoch; Miss Mary Henderson and Mrs. Lyman Cotten, from family records in their possession; the Southern Historical Col- lection, University of North Carolina; the Department of Ar- chives and History, Raleigh; the North Carolina Collection, Uni- versity of North Carolina Library; and the Church Commission, London. Some of the cuts used in illustrating this work were loaned by the Rev. William Way, Charleston, S. C; the Rev. I. Harding Hughes, Raleigh; and W. Preston Barber, Cleveland. Special thanks also are due Mrs. Hope S. Chamberlain for gracious permission to quote from her book, This Was Home.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfinished Journey: a Brief Racial History of the Diocese of Western North Carolina
    Unfinished Journey: A Brief Racial History of the Diocese of Western North Carolina Facing Our Past to Find Hope for Our Future Written as part of the “Repairing the Breach” Process Initiated at the 75th General Convention of the Episcopal Church in 2006 by The Rev. S. F. James Abbott, for the Commission to Dismantle Racism 2011 Unfinished Journey This e-version of Unfinished Journey is essentially the same as the book version, although it has been revised slightly to correct a few factual errors in the original. Please note that, in addition to the page numbers at the bottom of each page, the original book’s page numbers have been inserted into the text of this e-version, so that people using different versions can “be on the same page” when discussing the book together. Those page numbers are in bold print and in parentheses, also at the end of each page. Copyright 2011. Advance permission is given to reproduce all or parts of this book for educational purposes -2- With gratitude for the life and ministry of Fay Coker Walker 1943-2011 Trail-blazing visionary, wise counselor, spiritual companion and dear friend, without whom the journey so far would not have been nearly as clear, as fruitful, or as fun -3- Contents Preface page 5 Introduction page 7 Chapter 1 Background: The Origins and Unique Characteristics of Slavery in the United States……………………….. page 15 Chapter 2 The Diocese of North Carolina, 1817-1865………..page 20 Chapter 3 The Post-War Years, 1865-1898……………….…..page 26 Chapter 4 The Episcopal Church and Jim Crow Segregation...page
    [Show full text]
  • 1844 Journal of General Convention
    Journal of the Proceedings of the Bishops, Clergy, and Laity of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America Assembled in a General Convention 1844 Digital Copyright Notice Copyright 2017. The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America / The Archives of the Episcopal Church All rights reserved. Limited reproduction of excerpts of this is permitted for personal research and educational activities. Systematic or multiple copy reproduction; electronic retransmission or redistribution; print or electronic duplication of any material for a fee or for commercial purposes; altering or recompiling any contents of this document for electronic re-display, and all other re-publication that does not qualify as fair use are not permitted without prior written permission. Send written requests for permission to re-publish to: Rights and Permissions Office The Archives of the Episcopal Church 606 Rathervue Place P.O. Box 2247 Austin, Texas 78768 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 512-472-6816 Fax: 512-480-0437 OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE 3Jhteb Sia~eo of 'atera, ASSEMBLED IN A GENERAL CONVENTION, HELD) IN ST. ANDREW'S CHURCH, IN THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. From October 2d, to October 22d, inclusive, IN THE YEAR 01FOUR LORD 1844. WITH AN APPENDIX, CONTAINING, A LIST OF THE CLERGY, &c. NEW YORK: JAMES A. SPARKS, 161 FULTON STREET, CHURCHMANl5 BOOS STORE, (Opposite St. Paul's.) 1845. 3. W. BENEDICT & CO., STER. & PRINT., 16 Spruce street. INDEX TO THE PRINCIPAL MATTERS. PA~s Africa----- - - 107,177, 185 Arkansas, Resignation of Acting Miss'y Bishop - - 43, 137 Article X.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual History
    COLONIAL ORIGINS 1587 The rst settlement is established on & LEGACY Roanoke Island. 1587-1810 The Episcopal Church in North Carolina dates back to the rst English eorts at colonization. In August 1587, at 1701 what is now “the Lost Colony” on The rst Vestry Act is passed. Roanoke Island, the Native American The rst parish is An icon of Manteo and Virginia Dare, the rst two people Manteo and the English infant Virginia organized in Chowan. baptized in the Anglican The Society for the Church in the New World Dare became the rst two Anglicans Propagation of the baptized in the New World. Gospel (S.P.G.) is founded. The Vestry Act of 1701 made the Church of England the ocially sanctioned faith in North Carolina. Colonial parish vestries were charged with providing for church buildings and ministers by levying taxes and nes, but they faced hostility from Quakers, Presbyterians and other non-Anglican settlers. Moreover, parishes were geographi- cally large, settlements sparse and travel dicult. But the single greatest barrier to the growth and development of the Church was the chronic shortage of qualied ministers. Seal of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel The Church in North Carolina owes much to Governor William Tryon. When Tryon took 1734 oce in 1765, he began an active campaign St. Thomas, Bath, the oldest church to solicit clergy through the Society for the building in the state, Propagation of the Gospel (S.P. G.), the is constructed. quasi-ocial missionary arm of the Church of England founded in 1701. Although active in North Carolina from this time, the Society generally supported only one or two ministers at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Duncan Cameron's Contributions to the Episcopal Church, 1817-1842
    Duncan Cameron’s Contributions to the Episcopal Church, 1817-1842: A Profile in Lay Leadership. An Address Delivered at the Annual Homecoming Service St. Mary’s Chapel, Orange County August 24, 2008 The Rev. Brooks Graebner, Ph.D. Rector of St. Matthew’s, Hillsborough, & Historiographer of the Diocese of North Carolina In November 1908, Annie Ruffin Collins wrote to her brother, Bennehan Cameron, recollecting their grandfather’s signal contributions to the Episcopal Church. She wrote to express her complete agreement with her brother’s desire to honor their grandfather with these words: “that Judge [Duncan] Cameron was the Chairman of the Committee of the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, which established the General Episcopal Seminary in New York City, for the sons of this Church, & he founded St. Mary’s school for the education of Her daughters, proving himself a son, in sympathy with the work of his revered Father, the Rev. John Cameron.”1 Annie Collins wrote these words because her brother’s desire so to honor their grandfather with a memorial tablet at Old Blandford Church in Petersburg, Virginia, had become a source of contention. The descendants of the Rev. Dr. Aldert Smedes, the educator who started St. Mary’s School for girls and ran it for 35 years, took exception to the use of the word ‘Founder’ to describe Duncan Cameron’s contribution. To the Smedes family, Cameron and his descendants were simply the landlords who happened to own the school property and lease it to the Smedes’s. When the trustees of the St. Mary’s School and Bishop Cheshire went on record supporting the Smedes family interpretation, going so far as to pass a resolution stating “that the Rev.
    [Show full text]