NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: See “RATINGS” herein In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, (i) interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); and (ii) interest on the Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations under the Code; such interest, however, is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on such corporations. In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes imposed by the State of California. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $41,595,000 CALIFORNIA EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY 5.00% Revenue Bonds (University of Southern California), Series 2012A CUSIP1: 130178R81 Dated: Date of Delivery Yield: 2.220% Due: October 1, 2023 This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. Capitalized terms used in this cover page shall have the meanings given such terms herein. The Bonds are being issued as fully-registered bonds registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), which is acting as securities depository for the Bonds. Purchases of the Bonds may be made in book-entry form only, through brokers and dealers who are, or who act through, DTC Participants (as defined herein). Beneficial owners of the Bonds will not receive physical delivery of bond certificates. Payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be made to DTC by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”). Disbursement of payments to DTC Participants is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of payments to the beneficial owners is the responsibility of DTC Participants. See APPENDIX F - “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” herein. The Bonds are being issued by the California Educational Facilities Authority (the “Authority”), which will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (the “University”) pursuant to the Loan Agreement (as defined herein) to provide funds which the University will use to refinance various University facilities. The Bonds will be available in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The Bonds will be dated their date of issuance and will mature in the amount and on the date, and bear interest at the rate as shown above. Interest on the Bonds will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on April 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2012, until maturity or redemption. The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity at the Make-Whole Redemption Price, as described herein. The Authority is obligated to pay the Bonds solely from the Revenues (as defined herein) received from the University under the Loan Agreement and the other funds available therefor under the Indenture (as defined herein) pursuant to which the Bonds will be issued. The University’s payment obligations under the Loan Agreement are general, unsecured obligations of the University. THE BONDS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (THE “STATE”) OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY, BUT SHALL BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED THEREFOR BY THE UNIVERSITY. NEITHER THE STATE NOR THE AUTHORITY SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS, EXCEPT FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED UNDER THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND THE INDENTURE, AND NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS. THE BONDS ARE PAYABLE ONLY OUT OF FUNDS PLEDGED UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS SHALL NOT DIRECTLY, INDIRECTLY OR CONTINGENTLY OBLIGATE THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF TO LEVY OR TO PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION WHATSOEVER OR TO MAKE ANY APPROPRIATION FOR THEIR PAYMENT. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. The Bonds are offered by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as the Underwriter, when, as and if issued by the Authority and accepted by the Underwriter, subject to the approval of legality by Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel, and subject to certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by Nixon Peabody LLP, for the Authority by the Attorney General of the State of California, and for the University by the General Counsel to the University. It is expected that the Bonds will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC in New York, New York on or about August 29, 2012. Morgan Stanley Dated: August 15, 2012 ______1 CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. None of the Authority, the University or the Underwriter is responsible for the selection or uses of this CUSIP number, and no representation is made as to its correctness. ______OFFICE OF THE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS AGENT FOR SALE ______
This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell the Bonds in any jurisdiction in which or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer. No dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the Authority, the University or the Underwriter to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained herein, in connection with the offering of the Bonds and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon.
The information set forth herein under the captions “THE AUTHORITY” and “ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION” (solely as it relates to the Authority) has been obtained from the Authority. All other information set forth herein has been obtained from the University and other sources which are believed to be current and reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of such information is not guaranteed by, and is not to be construed as a representation by, the Authority or Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as the Underwriter.
The Underwriter has provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement: The Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of its responsibilities to investors under, the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of the offering of the Bonds and the security therefor, but the Underwriter does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
The order and the placement of materials in this Official Statement, including the Appendices, are not deemed to be a determination of relevance, materiality or importance, and this Official Statement, including the Appendices, must be considered in its entirety. ______
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITER MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE BONDS AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. ______
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute “forward- looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget” or other similar words. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, certain statements contained in the information in APPENDIX A - “THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.”
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. NEITHER THE AUTHORITY NOR THE UNIVERSITY PLANS TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ITS EXPECTATIONS, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...... 1 General ...... 1 The Bonds ...... 1 Book-Entry System ...... 1 Purposes ...... 2 Security and Sources of Payment for the Bonds ...... 2 The University ...... 2 Financial Condition of the University ...... 2 Covenants of the University ...... 3 Certain Information Related to this Official Statement ...... 3 PLAN OF REFUNDING ...... 3 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ...... 4 THE BONDS ...... 4 Description of the Bonds ...... 4 Optional Redemption ...... 4 BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM ...... 6 SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS ...... 6 Revenues and Base Loan Payments ...... 6 Investment Considerations ...... 7 THE AUTHORITY ...... 10 Organization and Membership of the Authority ...... 10 Indebtedness of the Authority ...... 11 ENFORCEABILITY OF REMEDIES ...... 11 LEGALITY FOR INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA ...... 11 TAX MATTERS ...... 11 Opinion of Bond Counsel ...... 11 Certain Ongoing Federal Tax Requirements and Covenants ...... 12 Certain Collateral Federal Tax Consequences ...... 12 Bond Premium ...... 12 Information Reporting and Backup Withholding ...... 13 Miscellaneous ...... 13 APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ...... 13 ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION ...... 13 UNDERWRITING ...... 13 RATINGS ...... 14 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ...... 14 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ...... 14 VERIFICATION ...... 15 MISCELLANEOUS ...... 15
APPENDIX A THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ...... A-1 APPENDIX B CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY ...... B-1 APPENDIX C CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS ...... C-1 APPENDIX D PROPOSED FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL ...... D-1 APPENDIX E FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ...... E-1 APPENDIX F BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM ...... F-1
(i)
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
$41,595,000 CALIFORNIA EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY Revenue Bonds (University of Southern California), Series 2012A
INTRODUCTION
This Introduction contains only a brief summary of certain of the terms of the Bonds being offered, and a full review should be made of the entire Official Statement, including the cover page and the Appendices (this “Official Statement”), in order to make an informed investment decision. All statements contained in this Introduction are qualified in their entirety by reference to the entire Official Statement. References to, and summaries of, provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of California (the “State”) or any documents referred to herein do not purport to be complete and such references are qualified in their entirety by reference to the complete provisions thereof.
General
This Official Statement, including the cover page and the Appendices hereto, provides certain information in connection with the offering of $41,595,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Bonds (University of Southern California), Series 2012A (the “Bonds”), of the California Educational Facilities Authority (the “Authority”).
The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the provisions of the California Educational Facilities Authority Act, constituting Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 94100) of Part 59 of Division 10 of Title 3 of the Education Code of the State, as amended (the “Act”), and the Indenture (defined below). Certain terms used herein are defined in APPENDIX C – “CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS – DEFINITIONS.”
The Bonds will be issued pursuant to and will be secured by an Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2012 (the “Indenture”), between the Authority and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Authority will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to the University of Southern California (the “University”) pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2012 (the “Loan Agreement”), between the Authority and the University.
The University may from time to time incur additional debt to finance or refinance its facilities.
The Bonds
The Bonds will be issued in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof in the aggregate principal amount shown on the cover page of this Official Statement. The Bonds will be dated their date of delivery and will mature in the amounts and on the dates, and bear interest at the rates as shown on the cover of this Official Statement. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing October 1, 2012. See “THE BONDS” herein.
Redemption
The Bonds are subject to optional redemption by the University prior to maturity at the Make-Whole Redemption Price described herein. See “THE BONDS – Optional Redemption” herein.
Book-Entry System
When delivered, the Bonds will be registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) which is acting as securities depository for the Bonds. Purchases of the Bonds may be made in book-entry form only, through brokers and dealers who are, or who act through, DTC Participants (as defined in Appendix F).
Beneficial Owners (as defined in Appendix F) of the Bonds will not receive physical delivery of certificated securities. Payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable by the Trustee to DTC, which will in turn remit such payments to the DTC Participants, which will in turn remit such payments to the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. See APPENDIX F – “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM.”
Purposes
The Authority will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to the University pursuant to the Loan Agreement to provide funds which the University will use to advance refund the Authority’s $50,000,000 currently outstanding principal amount of Revenue Bonds (University of Southern California), Series 2003A, dated March 20, 2003 (the “Prior Bonds”), as described under “PLAN OF REFUNDING” herein, and to pay certain costs of issuance. See “PLAN OF REFUNDING” and “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS” herein.
Security and Sources of Payment for the Bonds
The Authority is obligated to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds solely from the Revenues received from the University under the Loan Agreement and the other funds available under the Indenture. Pursuant to the Indenture, the Authority has pledged to the Trustee for the benefit of the Bondholders all of the Revenues.
Under the Loan Agreement, the University has an unconditional general obligation to pay the Base Loan Payments to be made thereunder, which are due in the amounts and at the times necessary to pay the principal (whether at maturity or upon acceleration or prior redemption) of and interest to the date of maturity or redemption of the Bonds, when due. The University’s payment obligations under the Loan Agreement are general, unsecured obligations of the University. There is no reserve fund with respect to the Bonds, and the University has not pledged or provided any other form of security for the Bonds.
THE BONDS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY, BUT SHALL BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED THEREFOR BY THE UNIVERSITY. NEITHER THE STATE NOR THE AUTHORITY SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS, EXCEPT FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED UNDER THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND THE INDENTURE, AND NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS. THE BONDS ARE PAYABLE ONLY OUT OF FUNDS PLEDGED UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS SHALL NOT DIRECTLY, INDIRECTLY OR CONTINGENTLY OBLIGATE THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF TO LEVY OR TO PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION WHATEVER OR TO MAKE ANY APPROPRIATION FOR THEIR PAYMENT. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. ALTHOUGH THE BONDS ARE BEING ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY, THE BONDS SHOULD BE VIEWED AS DIRECT OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY FOR PURPOSES OF EVALUATING THEIR SECURITY.
The University
The University is a nonprofit, coeducational university with its principal campus located near downtown Los Angeles, California. It currently has the largest enrollment of any private university in the State of California. In the fall of 2011, approximately 17,500 undergraduate and 20,500 graduate, professional and other students were enrolled at the University. See APPENDIX A – “THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA” for a more detailed description of the University.
Financial Condition of the University
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, total revenues, net of student aid, of the University were $3,922,665,000. At June 30, 2011, the University’s total assets were $7,652,732,000 and total liabilities were $1,923,874,000. The University’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011
2
are contained in APPENDIX B hereto and should be carefully reviewed by prospective investors in their entirety. See also APPENDIX A - “THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.”
Covenants of the University
The University has agreed to certain covenants for the protection of the Bondholders, including covenants to maintain its accredited status, and not to take any action that would impair the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds. These and other covenants of the University are described further in APPENDIX C – “CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS – CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT.”
Certain Information Related to this Official Statement
Included in this Official Statement and the Appendices hereto are descriptions of the Authority, the University, the Bonds, the Indenture and the Loan Agreement, as well as the Continuing Disclosure Agreement relating to the Bonds. All references herein to the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, are qualified in their entirety by reference to such documents, and the description herein of the Bonds is qualified in its entirety by the forms thereof and the information with respect thereto included in such documents. See APPENDIX C – “CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS – CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE,” for a brief summary of the rights and duties of the Authority, the rights and remedies of the Trustee and the Bondholders upon an event of default, provisions relating to amendments of the Indenture and procedures for defeasance of the Bonds.
All capitalized terms used in this Official Statement and not otherwise defined herein have the same meanings as in the Indenture. See APPENDIX C – “CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS – DEFINITIONS” for definitions of certain words and terms used but not otherwise defined herein.
The information and expressions of opinion herein speak only as of their date and are subject to change without notice. Neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder nor any future use of this Official Statement shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Authority or the University.
PLAN OF REFUNDING
The Authority will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to the University to provide funds which the University intends to use to advance refund the Prior Bonds. Pursuant to a Refunding Escrow Deposit Agreement, the Prior Bonds will be defeased upon issuance of the Bonds, and will be redeemed on April 1, 2013, at a redemption price of 100%.
3
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
The proceeds of the Bonds are expected to be used as follows:
Estimated Sources of Funds: Par Amount of the Bonds $41,595,000.00 Plus Original Issue Premium 11,309,680.50 Total Sources $52,904,680.50
Estimated Uses of Funds: Refunding of Prior Bonds $52,329,715.26 Costs of Issuance(1) 574,965.24 Total Uses $52,904,680.50
(1) Includes Underwriter’s fees, legal, financing and consulting fees, rating agency fees, printing costs and other miscellaneous expenses.
THE BONDS
Description of the Bonds
The Bonds are to be issued in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and any integral multiple thereof. The Bonds will be dated their date of delivery, will bear interest from that date and will mature in the amount and on the date, and bear interest at the rate, set forth on the cover of this Official Statement.
Interest on the Bonds will be payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing October 1, 2012, by check mailed by first class mail by the Trustee to the person whose name appears on the registration books of the Trustee as the registered owner thereof at the close of business on the Record Date for such interest installment; provided, however, that payment of such interest will be made by wire transfer to any registered owner of any Bonds in an aggregate principal amount of at least $1,000,000 if such registered owner shall have requested in writing payment by such method to such bank or trust company located within the United States at least 15 days before the applicable interest payment date. Interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30- day months. Principal of the Bonds will be payable by check of the Trustee denominated in lawful money of the United States upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee in Los Angeles, California.
The Bonds will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and held in DTC’s book- entry system. So long as the Bonds are held in the book-entry system, DTC or its nominee will be the registered owner of the Bonds for all purposes of the Indenture and the Bonds. So long as the Bonds are held in book-entry form through DTC, all payments with respect to principal of and interest on each Bond will be made pursuant to DTC’s rules and procedures. See “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” and APPENDIX F – “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” herein.
The Bonds may be transferred or exchanged at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee for other Bonds to the extent and upon the conditions set forth in the Indenture. The Trustee will require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to any such transfer or exchange.
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., is the Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds.
Optional Redemption
Make-Whole Redemption. The Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity on any date at the direction of the University, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
4
(i) one hundred percent (100%) of the Amortized Value (as described below) of such Bonds to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption; or
(ii) an amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining unpaid payments of principal and interest to be paid on such Bonds to be redeemed from and including the date of redemption to the stated maturity date of such Bonds, discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis at a discount rate equal to the Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate (as described below) for such Bonds (the “Make-Whole Redemption Price”).
The “Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate” for the Bonds will be the “Comparable AAA General Obligations” yield curve rate for the stated maturity date of the Bonds as published by Municipal Market Data five (5) Business Days prior to the date of redemption. If no such yield curve rate is established for the applicable year, the “Comparable AAA General Obligations” yield curve rate for the two published maturities most closely corresponding to the applicable year will be determined, and the “Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate” will be interpolated or extrapolated from those yield curve rates on a straight-line basis. Currently, this rate is made available daily by Municipal Market Data and is available to its subscribers through its internet address: www.tm3.com.
In calculating the Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate, should Municipal Market Data no longer publish the “Comparable AAA General Obligations” yield curve rate, then the Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate will equal the Consensus Scale yield curve rate for the applicable year. Currently, the Consensus Scale yield curve rate is made available daily by Municipal Market Advisors and is available to its subscribers through its internet address: www.mma-research.com.
In the further event Municipal Market Advisors no longer publishes the Consensus Scale, the Applicable Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Rate will be determined by an investment banking firm selected by the University, as the quotation agent, based upon the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity of those tax-exempt general obligation bonds rated in the highest rating category by Moody’s and S&P with a maturity date equal to the stated maturity date of the Bonds having characteristics (other than the ratings) most comparable to those of the Bonds in the judgment of the quotation agent. The quotation agent’s determination of the Applicable Tax-Exempt Bond Rate will be final and binding in the absence of manifest error.
The “Amortized Value” will equal the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed multiplied by the price of such Bonds expressed as a percentage, calculated five (5) Business Days prior to the date of redemption based on the industry standard method of calculating bond prices, with a delivery date equal to the date of redemption, a maturity date equal to the stated maturity date of such Bonds and a yield equal to 2.220%.
The Amortized Value and the Make-Whole Redemption Price of the Bonds described above will be determined by an independent accounting firm, investment banking firm or financial advisor (which accounting firm or financial advisor will be retained by the University at the expense of the University) to calculate such Amortized Value and Make-Whole Redemption Price. The Trustee, the Authority and the University may conclusively rely on such accounting firm’s, investment banking firm’s or financial advisor’s determination of such Amortized Value and Make-Whole Redemption Price and shall bear no liability for such reliance.
Selection of Bonds for Redemption. Whenever provision is made in the Indenture for the redemption of less than all of the Bonds, the Trustee shall select the Bonds by lot within a maturity in such manner as may be determined by the Trustee; provided, however, while the Bonds are held by DTC in the book-entry system, such selection shall be made by lot in such manner as shall be determined in accordance with DTC’s procedures.
Notice and Effect of Redemption. Notice of redemption shall be given by the Trustee as hereinafter provided to: (i) the respective Holders of any Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses shown on the registration books of the Trustee; (ii) the Authority; (iii) the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s EMMA System; and (iv) the Securities Depositories. Any notice of redemption shall be mailed by first class mail to Bondholders not less than thirty (30) days or more than sixty (60) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. Failure by the Trustee to give notice, or the insufficiency of any such notice, shall not affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for redemption of any Bond for which notice has been properly given. Notice of redemption having
5
been duly given as aforesaid, and moneys for payment of the redemption price of, together with interest accrued to the redemption date on, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption being held by the Trustee, on the redemption date designated in such notice, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption shall become due and payable at the redemption price specified in such notice and interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, interest on the Bonds so called for redemption shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date, said Bonds (or portions thereof) shall cease to be entitled to any lien, benefit or security under the Indenture, and the Holders of said Bonds shall have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of said redemption price and accrued interest to the redemption date.
Any notice of redemption given under the Indenture may be rescinded upon written request of the University at any time up to and including the fifth (5th) Business Day prior to the date fixed for redemption. The Trustee shall give notice of such rescission in the same manner as for notices of redemption.
BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM
The information in this section and in APPENDIX F – “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from sources that the University believes to be reliable, but neither the University, the Authority, nor the Underwriter take any responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
The Bonds are in book-entry form, without coupons, and will be initially registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Purchasers of the Bonds will not receive instruments representing their interests in the Bonds purchased. DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Payments of principal of and interest on the Bonds will be payable by the Trustee to DTC, which will in turn remit such payments to DTC Participants for the benefit of the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds, all as more fully described herein. See APPENDIX F –“BOOK- ENTRY SYSTEM” herein.
In the event that (i) DTC determines not to continue to act as securities depository for the Bonds, (ii) DTC shall no longer so act and gives notice to the Trustee of such determination or (iii) the Authority determines, with the consent of the University, that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds and delivers a written certificate to the Trustee to that effect, DTC’s services will be discontinued. If the Authority determines to replace DTC with another qualified securities depository, the Authority shall prepare or direct preparation of a new single, separate, fully registered Bond for each maturity, registered in the name of such successor or substitute qualified securities depository or its nominee. If the Authority fails to identify another qualified securities depository to replace DTC, then the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the Bond registration books in the name of Cede & Co., but shall be registered in whatever name or names Beneficial Owners transferring or exchanging Bonds shall designate, in accordance with the Indenture.
If the Authority fails to identify another qualified securities depository to replace DTC, or if the book-entry system is discontinued, principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be paid as described herein under the heading “THE BONDS – Description of the Bonds.”
SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS
Revenues and Base Loan Payments
The Authority is obligated to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds solely from the Revenues received from the University under the Loan Agreement and the other funds available therefor under the Indenture. Pursuant to the Indenture, the Authority has pledged to the Trustee for the benefit of the Bondholders all of the Revenues. “Revenues” mean all payments received by the Authority or the Trustee from the University pursuant to or with respect to the Loan Agreement (except Additional Payments, certain other expenses incurred by the Authority and the Trustee, indemnification payments and amounts received for or on deposit in the Rebate Fund) including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the applicable Base Loan Payments (including both timely and delinquent payments), prepayments and all income derived from the investment of any money in any fund or account established pursuant to the Indenture. There will be no reserve fund with respect to the Bonds.
6
Under the Loan Agreement, the University has an unconditional general obligation to pay the Base Loan Payments to be made thereunder, which payments are due in the amounts and at the times necessary to pay the principal (whether at maturity or upon acceleration or prior redemption) of, and interest to the date of maturity or redemption of the Bonds, when due. The University’s payment obligations under the Loan Agreement are general, unsecured obligations of the University.
THE BONDS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY, BUT SHALL BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED THEREFOR BY THE UNIVERSITY. NEITHER THE STATE NOR THE AUTHORITY SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS, EXCEPT FROM THE FUNDS PROVIDED UNDER THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND THE INDENTURE, AND NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS. THE BONDS ARE PAYABLE ONLY OUT OF FUNDS PLEDGED UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS SHALL NOT DIRECTLY, INDIRECTLY OR CONTINGENTLY OBLIGATE THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF TO LEVY OR TO PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION WHATEVER OR TO MAKE ANY APPROPRIATION FOR THEIR PAYMENT. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. ALTHOUGH THE BONDS WILL BE ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY, THE BONDS SHOULD BE VIEWED AS DIRECT OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY FOR PURPOSES OF EVALUATING THEIR SECURITY.
Pursuant to the Act, the State will not limit, alter or restrict the rights vested by the Act in the Authority and the University with respect to the collection of the Revenues pledged under the Indenture, nor will it in any way impair the rights or remedies of the Bondholders.
Investment Considerations
Except as noted herein, the Bonds are payable solely from and secured by the Authority’s pledge of the Revenues, which consist primarily of payments to be made by the University under the Loan Agreement. There can be no assurance that income and receipts will be realized by the University in amounts sufficient to make payments under the Loan Agreement and thus sufficient to pay the principal of or interest on the Bonds.
Future economic and other conditions, including, without limitation, the loss by the University of one or more of its accreditations, destruction or loss of a substantial portion of the University’s facilities, litigation, competition, reduction in the amounts received by the University through fundraising efforts, reduction of the value of endowment funds, changes in the demand for post-high school education and changes in tuition rates and/or tuition discounting, may adversely affect income and receipts of the University. There can be no assurance that University income and receipts will not decrease.
The University operates hospital and health care facilities. As such, the University has hospital and health care operating risks, in addition to the University’s significant higher educational operations. See APPENDIX A hereto. With respect to the operations of hospital facilities, there is a risk that costs of providing health care and hospital services will increase faster than the ability to recover such costs from Medicare, Medi-Cal and other third party payers.
The following are certain investment considerations and risk factors that have been identified by the University and should be carefully considered by prospective purchasers of the Bonds. The following should not be considered to be exhaustive. Investors should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Inclusion of certain factors below is not intended to signify that there are not other investment considerations or risks attendant to the Bonds. See APPENDIX A for additional information on the University.
Both the University’s stature in the educational community and its consolidated revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities may be affected by events, developments and conditions relating generally to, among other things, the ability of the University (a) to provide educational and research services of the types and quality required to maintain its stature; (b) to generate sufficient revenues, while controlling expenses, so that these services can be
7
provided at a cost acceptable to the University’s consumers; (c) to attract faculty, staff and management necessary to provide these services and a student body of commensurate quality; and (d) to build and maintain the facilities necessary to provide these services.
In turn, success in these areas depends upon the ability of the University and its management to respond to substantial challenges in a rapidly changing environment including, among others: (i) competition in the provision of educational services particularly through new educational media and distance learning and an increasing number of international programs and collaborative projects; (ii) developments in the regional, national and international economies, such as the high regional cost of living, the limited availability of affordable housing within reasonable commuting distance and increases in regional energy costs; (iii) volatility in the financial markets, variations in economic growth, changes in monetary policy and taxation, and the adequacy of the University’s investment management policies and the performance of its investments in the face of such challenges, all of which may negatively impact funds available from the University’s endowment, other investments and its donors to support University operations and capital needs; and (iv) legislation and regulation by governmental authorities, including developments affecting the tax-exempt status of educational institutions like the University, changes in levels of governmental research funding and reimbursement for administrative overhead and infrastructure, regulation of tuition levels, and limitations imposed by the City of Los Angeles General Plan and Zoning Code on the University’s expansion and use of facilities. The preservation and growth of the University’s endowment are affected not only by the factors noted above but by discretionary increases in the annual payout to operations from endowment earnings, transfers of expendable funds and other distributions, all of which are subject to changes in policies and practices made by the Board and University management.
A variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors may affect the financial strength and stature of the University. By its nature, the University is an open environment, potentially vulnerable to disruption of operations, injury and damage notwithstanding its security and public safety programs. It is subject to governmental investigations and enforcement action and private suits, and may incur substantial costs of defense, sanctions, penalties and reputational harm for violation of laws applicable to the University in its routine operations. The University is a large landowner; it routinely stores, uses and produces hazardous substances in its operations; it houses several thousand students, faculty and others. The University purchases third-party insurance for losses resulting from fire and related natural hazards to the extent such losses exceed a deductible of $75,000 per occurrence. While the University’s property insurance coverage is believed by University management to be adequate and commensurate with an acceptable standard for comparable universities, the limits purchased are for expected losses and would fall short of covering the damage caused by a catastrophic event. The University carries limited third-party insurance for damage to facilities sustained from flooding and no third party insurance for damage to facilities due to seismic events. The University is located in a region that is subject to significant seismic activity. In the event of a significant seismic event, the University could suffer substantial damage to its facilities and disruption to its operations.
The University, as described above, operates certain hospital and health care facilities. The future financial condition of the University and its health care operations could be adversely affected by, among other things, increased competition from other health care entities, the costs associated with responding to governmental inquiries and investigations, demand for health care, other forms of care or treatment, changes in the methods by which employers purchase health care for employees, capability of management, future changes in the economy, demographic changes, health care reform and related changes in the structure of how health care is delivered and financed, availability of physicians and nurses, and malpractice claims and other litigation. These factors and others may adversely affect payment by the University under the Loan Agreement.
As a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, enacted in March 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (the “ACA”), substantial changes are anticipated in the United States health care system. Some of the provisions of the ACA took effect immediately, while others will take effect at later dates or will be phased in over time. Such legislation includes numerous provisions affecting the delivery of health care services, the financing of health care costs, reimbursement of health care providers and the legal obligations of health insurers, providers, employers and consumers. These provisions are slated to take effect at specified times over approximately the next decade, and, therefore, the full consequences of the ACA on the health care industry will not be immediately realized. Due to the complexity of the ACA, the ramifications of federal health care reform legislation may also become apparent only following implementation or through later regulatory and judicial
8
interpretations. Portions of the ACA may also be limited or nullified as a result of legal challenges or amendments. In addition, the uncertainties regarding the implementation of the ACA create unpredictability for the strategic and business planning efforts of health care providers, which in itself constitutes a risk. The changes in the health care industry brought about by the ACA will likely have both positive and negative effects, directly and indirectly, on the nation’s hospitals and other health care providers, including the University’s hospitals and health care facilities.
The ACA has been subject to opposition in the political and judicial arenas. Multiple challenges to the constitutionality of the ACA were filed by private and state parties in federal courts, culminating in a hearing by the Supreme Court in March 2012 and a decision on June 28, 2012, which largely upheld the ACA as constitutional. The Supreme Court limited the scope of the ACA in one important respect, restricting the federal government’s ability to condition Medicaid funding on state’s participation in the Medicaid expansion. As a result, states effectively have the option but not the obligation to extend Medicaid coverage to the indigent adult population specified in the ACA. Although the Supreme Court’s ruling removed a significant source of uncertainty surrounding the implementation of federal health care reform, legislative repeal under a future Congress or Presidential administration remains a possibility. The practical consequences of the ACA, as well as of other future federal and state actions to cut costs and change the health care delivery system in the United States, cannot be foreseen.
Health care providers rely to a high degree on payment from the federal Medicare program and the State’s Medicaid program, known as the Medi-Cal program. Future changes in the underlying law and regulations, as well as payment policy and timing, create uncertainty and could have a material adverse impact on a hospital’s payment streams from these sources. With health care and hospital spending reported to be increasing faster than the rate of general inflation, and with federal budgetary allocations in a tenuous state due to the sustained national financial crisis, Congress and/or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may take action in the future to decrease or restrain Medicare outlays for hospitals and other health care providers. As Medi-Cal is partially funded by the State, the financial condition of the State is also likely to affect funding levels and/or cause payment delays. This could have a material adverse impact on health care providers, including the University. Moreover, State funding for specialized programs for which a hospital may be eligible may be particularly susceptible to changes in State budgetary constraints.
“Fraud” in government funded health care programs is a significant concern of many states and is one of the federal government's prime law enforcement priorities. The federal government and, to a lesser degree, state governments, impose a wide variety of extraordinarily complex and technical requirements intended to prevent overutilization based on economic inducements, misallocation of expenses, overcharging and other forms of “fraud” in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, as well as other state and federally-funded health care programs. This body of regulation impacts a broad spectrum of hospital activities and functions, including billing, accounting. recordkeeping, medical staff oversight, physician contracting and recruiting, cost allocation, clinical trials, discounts and other functions and transactions. Violations and alleged violations may occur in circumstances where management is unaware of the conduct in question, as a result of mistake, or where the individual participants do not know that their conduct is in violation of law. Violations may occur and be prosecuted in circumstances that do not have the traditional elements of fraud, and enforcement actions may extend to conduct that occurred in the past. The government and/or private “whistleblowers” often pursue aggressive investigative and enforcement actions. The government may impose a wide array of civil, criminal and monetary penalties, including withholding essential hospital payments from the Medicare or Medicaid programs, or exclusion from those programs. Aggressive investigation tactics, negative publicity and threatened penalties can be, and often are used to force settlements, payment of fines and prospective restrictions that may have a material adverse impact on hospital operations, financial condition and reputation. Multi-million dollar fines and settlements are common. These risks are generally uninsured. Government enforcement and private whistleblower suits may increase in the hospital sector.
In recent years the number of professional and general liability suits and the dollar amounts of damage recoveries have increased in health care nationwide, resulting in substantial increases in malpractice insurance premiums, higher deductibles and generally less coverage. Professional liability and other actions alleging wrongful conduct and seeking punitive damages are often filed against hospitals and other health care providers. Insurance does not provide coverage for judgments for punitive damages. Litigation also arises from the corporate and business activities of hospitals, from a hospital’s status as an employer or as a result of medical staff or provider network peer review or the denial of medical staff or provider network privileges. As with professional liability,
9
many of these risks are covered by insurance, but some are not. For example, some antitrust claims or business disputes are not covered by insurance or other sources and may, in whole or in part, be a liability of the hospital or other health care provider, such as the University, if determined or settled adversely.
Medical liability litigation is subject to public policy determinations and legal procedural rules that may be altered from time to time, with the result that the frequency and cost of such litigation, and resultant liabilities, may increase in the future. Hospitals, including those owned and operated by the University, may be affected by negative financial and liability impacts on physicians. Costs of insurance, including self-insurance, may increase dramatically.
THE AUTHORITY
The Authority is a public instrumentality of the State created pursuant to the provisions of the Act. The Authority is authorized to issue the bonds under the Act, to make the loan contemplated by the Loan Agreement and to secure the Bonds by the pledge of the Revenues received by the Authority pursuant to the Loan Agreement and certain other sources of payment as provided in the Indenture, including amounts held in specified funds or accounts pursuant to such Indenture (excluding the Rebate Fund).
Organization and Membership of the Authority
The members of the Authority consist of the Treasurer, the Controller and the Director of Finance of the State and two members appointed by the governor of the State. Of the two appointed members, one must be affiliated with a public institution of higher education and the other must be affiliated with a private institution of higher education.
The members of the Authority serve without compensation but are entitled to reimbursement of actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.
The present members and officers of the Authority and their occupations are as follows:
Bill Lockyer Chairman, Treasurer of the State of California1
John Chiang Member, Controller of the State of California
Ana J. Matosantos Member, Director of Finance of the State of California
William G.McGinnis Member, Trustee, Butte-Glenn Community College District Board of Trustees
Michael L. Jackson Member, Vice President, Student Affairs, University of Southern California2
Ronald L. Washington is the Executive Director of the Authority and is responsible to the Authority for the management of its affairs. Public Financial Management, Inc., San Francisco, California, serves as financial advisor and pricing advisor to the Authority. The Attorney General of the State of California is counsel to the Authority.
1 Treasurer Bill Lockyer is currently teaching a class at the University and therefore did not participate in any discretionary action of the Authority or of the State Treasurer’s Office relating to the University. 2 Mr. Jackson did not participate in any action of the Authority relating to the University.
10
Indebtedness of the Authority
The Act does not limit the amount of indebtedness the Authority may have outstanding from time to time. As of June 30, 2012, the Authority had outstanding $4,381,328,079 aggregate principal amount of bonds and notes (excluding certain bonds and notes which have been defeased) issued on behalf of various California independent colleges and universities.
ENFORCEABILITY OF REMEDIES
The remedies available to the Trustee or the Bondholders upon an Event of Default under the Indenture or the Loan Agreement are in many respects dependent upon judicial actions which are often subject to discretion and delay, and such remedies may not be readily available or may be limited. In particular, under the United States Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy case may be filed by or against the University or by or against any of its affiliates. In general, the filing of any such petition operates as a stay against enforcement of the terms of the agreements to which the bankrupt entity is a party. The various legal opinions delivered in connection with the issuance of the Bonds (including Bond Counsel’s approving opinion) are qualified, as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments, by limitations imposed by bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and by general principles of equity applied in the exercise of judicial discretion.
LEGALITY FOR INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA
Obligations issued by the Authority under the Act are, under California law, securities in which all banks, savings banks, trust companies, savings and loan associations, investment companies and other persons carrying on a banking business, all insurance companies, insurance associations and other persons carrying on an insurance business, and all administrators, executors, guardians, trustees and other fiduciaries and all other persons whatsoever, who now are or may hereafter be authorized to invest in bonds or other obligations of the State, may properly and legally invest any funds, including capital belonging to them or within their control; and such obligations are securities which may properly and legally be deposited with and received by any state or municipal officer or agency of the State for any purpose for which the deposit of bonds or notes or other obligations of the State is now or may hereafter be authorized by law.
TAX MATTERS
Opinion of Bond Counsel
In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, (i) interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and (ii) interest on the Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations under the Code; such interest, however, is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on such corporations. In rendering its opinion, Bond Counsel has relied on certain representations, certifications of fact, and statements of reasonable expectations made by the Authority, the University and others in connection with the Bonds, and Bond Counsel has assumed compliance by the Authority and the University with certain ongoing covenants to comply with applicable requirements of the Code to assure the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income under Section 103 of the Code. In addition, in rendering its opinion, Bond Counsel has relied on the opinion of counsel to the University regarding, among other matters, the current qualification of the University as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.
In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, interest on the Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income taxes.
Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other Federal or state tax consequences with respect to the Bonds. Bond Counsel renders its opinion under existing statutes and court decisions as of the issue date, and assumes no obligation to update, revise or supplement its opinion to reflect any action hereafter taken or not taken, or any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to its attention, or changes in law or interpretations thereof
11
that may hereafter occur, or for any other reason. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion on the effect of any action hereafter taken or not taken in reliance upon an opinion of other counsel on the exclusion from gross income for Federal income tax purposes of interest on the Bonds, or under state and local tax law.
Certain Ongoing Federal Tax Requirements and Covenants
The Code establishes certain ongoing requirements that must be met subsequent to the issuance and delivery of the Bonds in order that interest on the Bonds be and remain excluded from gross income under Section 103 of the Code. These requirements include, but are not limited to, requirements relating to use and expenditure of gross proceeds of the Bonds, yield and other restrictions on investments of gross proceeds, and the arbitrage rebate requirement that certain excess earnings on gross proceeds be rebated to the Federal government. Noncompliance with such requirements may cause interest on the Bonds to become included in gross income for Federal income tax purposes retroactive to their issue date, irrespective of the date on which such noncompliance occurs or is discovered. The Authority and the University have covenanted to comply with certain applicable requirements of the Code to assure the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income under Section 103 of the Code.
Certain Collateral Federal Tax Consequences
The following is a brief discussion of certain collateral Federal income tax matters with respect to the Bonds. It does not purport to address all aspects of Federal taxation that may be relevant to a particular owner of a Bond. Prospective investors, particularly those who may be subject to special rules, are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding the Federal tax consequences of owning and disposing of the Bonds.
Prospective owners of the Bonds should be aware that the ownership of such obligations may result in collateral Federal income tax consequences to various categories of persons, such as corporations (including S corporations and foreign corporations), financial institutions, property and casualty and life insurance companies, individual recipients of Social Security and railroad retirement benefits, individuals otherwise eligible for the earned income tax credit, and taxpayers deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase or carry obligations the interest on which is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. Interest on the Bonds may be taken into account in determining the tax liability of foreign corporations subject to the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code.
Bond Premium
In general, if an owner acquires a Bond for a purchase price (excluding accrued interest) or otherwise at a tax basis that reflects a premium over the sum of all amounts payable on the Bond after the acquisition date (excluding certain “qualified stated interest” that is unconditionally payable at least annually at prescribed rates), that premium constitutes “bond premium” on that Bond (a “Premium Bond”). In general, under Section 171 of the Code, an owner of a Premium Bond must amortize the bond premium over the remaining term of the Premium Bond, based on the owner’s yield over the remaining term of the Premium Bond, determined based on constant yield principles (in certain cases involving a Premium Bond callable prior to its stated maturity date, the amortization period and yield may be required to be determined on the basis of an earlier call date that results in the lowest yield on such bond). An owner of a Premium Bond must amortize the bond premium by offsetting the qualified stated interest allocable to each interest accrual period under the owner’s regular method of accounting against the bond premium allocable to that period. In the case of a tax-exempt Premium Bond, if the bond premium allocable to an accrual period exceeds the qualified stated interest allocable to that accrual period, the excess is a nondeductible loss. Under certain circumstances, the owner of a Premium Bond may realize a taxable gain upon disposition of the Premium Bond even though it is sold or redeemed for an amount less than or equal to the owner’s original acquisition cost. Owners of any Premium Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of bond premium for Federal income tax purposes, including various special rules relating thereto, and state and local tax consequences, in connection with the acquisition, ownership, amortization of bond premium on, sale, exchange, or other disposition of Premium Bonds.
12
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Information reporting requirements will apply to interest paid on tax-exempt obligations, including the Bonds. In general, such requirements are satisfied if the interest recipient completes, and provides the payor with, a Form W-9, “Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification”, or if the recipient is one of a limited class of exempt recipients. A recipient not otherwise exempt from information reporting who fails to satisfy the information reporting requirements will be subject to “backup withholding”, which means that the payor is required to deduct and withhold a tax from the interest payment, calculated in the manner set forth in the Code. For the foregoing purpose, a “payor” generally refers to the person or entity from whom a recipient receives its payments of interest or who collects such payments on behalf of the recipient.
If an owner purchasing a Bond through a brokerage account has executed a Form W-9 in connection with the establishment of such account, as generally can be expected, no backup withholding should occur. In any event, backup withholding does not affect the excludability of the interest on the Bonds from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. Any amounts withheld pursuant to backup withholding would be allowed as a refund or a credit against the owner’s Federal income tax once the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Miscellaneous
Tax legislation, administrative actions taken by tax authorities, or court decisions, whether at the Federal or state level, may adversely affect the tax-exempt status of interest on the Bonds under Federal or state law or otherwise prevent beneficial owners of the Bonds from realizing the full current benefit of the tax status of such interest. In addition, such legislation or actions (whether currently proposed, proposed in the future, or enacted) and such decisions could affect the market price or marketability of the Bonds.
Prospective purchasers of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding the foregoing matters.
APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The validity of the issuance of the Bonds under California law is subject to the approval of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel. The proposed form of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel to be delivered upon the issuance of the Bonds is attached hereto as APPENDIX D. Bond Counsel undertakes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement. Certain legal matters pertaining to the Authority will be passed upon by the Attorney General of the State of California. The Attorney General undertakes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the University by the University’s General Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by Nixon Peabody LLP, counsel to the Underwriter.
ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION
There is no litigation now pending, with service of process having been accomplished or, to the knowledge of their respective officers, threatened, against the Authority or the University, which in any way seeks to restrain or enjoin the sale, execution or delivery of the Bonds, or in any way contests or affects the validity of the Bonds or the validity of any proceedings or transaction relating to their sale and issuance. To the knowledge of the University, there is no litigation pending or threatened which in any manner questions the right of the University to make payments under the Loan Agreement in order to repay the Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture or which would have a material adverse impact on the University’s financial position or results of operations. See APPENDIX A - “THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - Litigation” for additional information relating to the University.
UNDERWRITING
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as the underwriter (the “Underwriter”), has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase the Bonds from the Authority at a price equal to $52,695,805.68, which represents the par
13
amount of the Bonds of $41,595,000.00, less an Underwriter’s discount of $208,874.82, and plus an original issue premium of $11,309,680.50. The Underwriter is obligated under the purchase contract to purchase all of the Bonds if any are purchased. The Bonds may be offered and sold by the Underwriter to certain dealers and others at yields lower than the public offering prices or yields indicated in the cover hereof, and such public offering prices or yields may be changed, from time to time, by the Underwriter.
Morgan Stanley, parent company of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, the Underwriter, has entered into a retail brokerage joint venture with Citigroup Inc. As part of the joint venture, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC will distribute municipal securities to retail investors through the financial advisor network of a new broker-dealer, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. This distribution arrangement became effective on June 1, 2009. As part of this arrangement, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC will compensate Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for its selling efforts with respect to the Bonds.
RATINGS
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”), a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business, have assigned the Bonds long-term ratings of “Aa1” and “AA”, respectively. Any explanation of the significance of such ratings may only be obtained from the rating agency furnishing the same.
Generally, rating agencies base their ratings on information and materials furnished and on investigation, studies, and assumptions by the rating agencies. There is no assurance that the ratings mentioned above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating might not be lowered or withdrawn entirely, if in the judgment of the rating agency originally establishing the rating, circumstances so warrant. Except as otherwise provided in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement relating to the Bonds, the Authority, the University, and the Underwriter have not undertaken any responsibility to bring to the attention of the Bondholders any proposed change in or withdrawal of a rating or to oppose any such proposed revision or withdrawal. Any such downward change in or withdrawal of a rating might have an adverse effect on the market price or marketability of the Bonds.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The consolidated financial statements of the University and its subsidiaries as of and for the year ended June 30, 2011, included in APPENDIX B of this Official Statement, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, as stated in their report appearing herein.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
Because the Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from amounts received from the University, financial or operating data concerning the Authority is not material to any evaluation of the offering of the Bonds or to any decision to purchase, hold or sell the Bonds. Accordingly, the Authority is not providing any such information. The University has undertaken all responsibilities for any continuing disclosure to Bondholders as described below, and the Authority shall have no liability to the Holders of the Bonds or any other person with respect to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Rule”).
The University has covenanted for the benefit of the Holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds to provide to the Trustee for dissemination as described below certain financial information and operating data relating to the University by not later than 210 days following the end of the University’s fiscal year (which fiscal year currently begins on July 1 of each year and ends on the next succeeding June 30 (each such twelve-month period a “Fiscal Year”)) (the “Annual Report”), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events, if material. The Annual Report will be filed by the University or the Trustee, as dissemination agent, on behalf of the University as required by the Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The notices of material events will be filed by the University or the Trustee, as dissemination agent, on behalf of the University with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) through its Electronic Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) system or as otherwise required by the Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of material events is set forth in the form of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement attached hereto as
14
APPENDIX E - “FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.” These covenants have been made in order to assist the Underwriter in complying with the Rule.
In the past five years, the University has timely filed its audited financial statements and complied with its undertakings to report on certain events in a timely manner. The University believes that its required annual updates to certain financial information for fiscal years 2007 through 2011 were prepared on a timely basis; however, such updates for fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2011 were either not available to investors or proper references to other publicly available updated material were not properly filed. All of the required annual financial information updates have now been filed with the MSRB and are available on the EMMA website.
VERIFICATION
On the date of issuance of the Bonds, a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to purchase U.S. Treasury Securities – State and Local Government Series (the “Government Obligations”) to be held in trust by the Trustee, as Refunding Escrow Deposit Agent (the “Refunding Escrow Deposit Agent”) to provide for the payment of principal of and interest and premium, if any, on the Prior Bonds to their call date. The arithmetical accuracy of certain computations included in the schedules provided by or on behalf of the Authority and the University relating to (a) computations of anticipated receipts of principal and interest on the Government Obligations to pay the regularly scheduled debt service on the Prior Bonds until the call date and to redeem the Prior Bonds on the call date, and (b) computations of yields on the Prior Bonds and the Government Obligations will be verified by Chris D. Berens, CPA, P.C., a firm of independent public accountants, as verification agent. Such computations are based solely upon assumptions and information supplied by or on behalf of the Authority and the University. The verification agent has restricted its procedures to verifying the arithmetical accuracy of certain computations and has not made any study or evaluation of the assumptions and information upon which the computations are based and, accordingly, has not expressed an opinion on the data used, the reasonableness of the assumptions, or the achievability of future events.
In the event that the securities and amounts held in the Refunding Escrow Deposit Fund are restructured at any time prior to the redemption of the Prior Bonds, the Refunding Escrow Deposit Agreement requires that the verification agent, or its successor or assigns, or another verification agent, will provide a new mathematical report containing the information set forth above with respect to any such restructuring.
MISCELLANEOUS
All quotations from and summaries and explanations of the Act, the Indenture, the Loan Agreement and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and of other statutes and documents contained herein, do not purport to be complete, and reference is made to said documents and statutes for full and complete statements of their provisions. Copies in reasonable quantities of the Indenture and the Loan Agreement may be obtained upon request directed to the Trustee, the Underwriter or the University.
Information relating to DTC and the book-entry system described under the heading “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” and APPENDIX F - “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM” is based upon information furnished by DTC and is believed to be reliable, but neither the Authority, the University nor the Underwriter make any representations or warranties whatsoever with respect to such information.
The Authority has reviewed the information contained under the captions “THE AUTHORITY” and “ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION” (as it relates solely to the Authority) and has approved the information under those captions for use in this Official Statement. The purchase contract for the Bonds contain provisions constituting the agreement of the University to indemnify the Authority and the Underwriter against losses, claims, damages and liabilities arising out of any incorrect or misleading statements or information contained in this Official Statement pertaining to the University and supplied by it. APPENDIX A has been prepared by the University, and APPENDIX B, the University’s consolidated financial statements, was furnished by the University. APPENDIX C, Certain Provisions of Principal Documents, and APPENDIX D, Proposed Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel, have been prepared by Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel. APPENDIX E, Form of Continuing Disclosure Agreement, has been prepared by Nixon Peabody LLP. All of the Appendices hereto are incorporated as an integral part of this Official Statement.
15
Any statements in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion are intended as such and not as representation of fact. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the Authority or the University and the holders of any of the Bonds. The Appendices hereto contain certain information with respect to the University. The information contained in the Appendices has been furnished by the University and officers and officials of the University, and by other sources the University believes to be current and reliable, and the Authority makes no representations or warranties whatsoever with respect to the information contained in the Appendices or any other information contained in this Official Statement, except for information set forth under the captions “THE AUTHORITY” and “ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION” (solely as it relates to the Authority).
16
The execution and delivery of this Official Statement by the undersigned have been duly authorized by the Authority.
CALIFORNIA EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY
By /s/ Ronald L. Washington Ronald L. Washington Executive Director
This Official Statement has been reviewed and approved by the University of Southern California. Concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds, the University will furnish a certificate executed on behalf of the University by its Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer (or other authorized officer) to the effect that this Official Statement, except for the sections “BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM,” “THE AUTHORITY,” “UNDERWRITING” and “ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION,” and APPENDIX D and APPENDIX F (solely as such sections relate to DTC, the book-entry system, and the Authority) as of the date of this Official Statement and as of the date of delivery of the Bonds, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact relating to the University or omit to state such a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Robert Abeles Robert Abeles Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer Dated: August 15, 2012
17
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
APPENDIX A
THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
APPENDIX A
THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Introduction
The University of Southern California (the “University” or “USC”) is a nonprofit, coeducational university with its principal campus located near downtown Los Angeles, California. The University currently has the largest enrollment of any private university in California. In the fall of 2011, 17,414 undergraduate and 20,596 graduate, professional and other students were enrolled at the University and the University expects Fall 2012 enrollment to be substantially the same. The University is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Financial Information
The audited financial statements of the University are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, are set forth in Appendix B to the Official Statement. The Consolidated Balance Sheet presents the financial position of the University as of the end of the fiscal year. The Statement of Activities presents financial activities during the fiscal year, thereby reconciling the beginning and end-of-year net asset positions contained in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Statement of Cash Flows summarizes cash related activities during the fiscal year, thereby reconciling the beginning and end-of-year cash balances contained in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The audited financial statements are an integral part hereof and should be read in their entirety.
Five years of certain comparative financial data for the University are set forth below under the table captioned “Consolidated Balance Sheet Summary.”
Consolidated Balance Sheet Summary
As of June 30, (dollars in thousands)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Assets $6,342,621 $6,363,326 $5,933,398 $6,464,226 $7,652,732 Total Liabilities 1,135,025 1,186,883 1,627,341 1,727,294 1,923,874
Total Net Assets $5,207,596 $5,176,443 $4,306,057 $4,736,932 $5,728,858
From June 30, 2007, to June 30, 2011, total net assets increased by approximately 10.0%. This increase is largely attributable to the net appreciation in the fair value of investments of the endowment, consistent with the gains seen in the underlying equity markets over that period. See “Investments” below.
Sponsored Research
The University receives substantial funds from the federal and state governments and from private organizations in the form of sponsored research grants and contracts. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, the University reported sponsored research grants and contracts of approximately $590 million. Through fiscal year 2011 federal and state government support accounted for approximately 80% of the University’s sponsored research, while private support accounted for the remaining amount. The University incurs, and is reimbursed for, certain direct and indirect costs to support these sponsored programs and research projects.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) was signed into law on February 17, 2009. Of the $787 billion included in ARRA, approximately $21 billion was targeted for the support of research and development programs. In order to realize the greatest stimulus or recovery benefits, in most cases recipients are
A-1
expected to spend the ARRA funds within a two-year period with reporting of expenditures, progress and jobs created on a quarterly basis. The University received approximately $151 million in awards under ARRA since its inception through the end of fiscal year 2011.
The following table illustrates the growth in research-related revenue over the last five fiscal years. The significant increase in funding reflected following fiscal year 2009 was the result, in part, of ARRA funding and a concerted effort and investment in expanding USC’s research enterprise for the long term. This includes investment in research core facilities, faculty, administration, and translational and clinical medicine disciplines. There can be no guarantee that the government and private support received by the University for sponsored research will continue in the future or that such support will continue to increase or remain at the University’s historic levels.
Sponsored Research
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, (dollars in millions)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Project Awards $415 $485 $464 $560 $590 Annual Direct Expenditures for Sponsored Research 329 328 353 357 287 Indirect Cost Recovery 101 104 112 119 132
Total $845 $917 $929 $1,036 $1,009
As reflected in Note 10 to the financial statements included in Appendix B to the Official Statement, executed contracts, grants, subcontracts and cooperative agreements for future sponsored research activity not reflected in the financial statements totaled approximately $1,077 million as of June 30, 2011.
Unlike direct costs, indirect costs are usually incurred for purposes common to several University projects, programs or activities, and include such expense items as utilities, facilities and general and administrative expenses. Accordingly, it is difficult to allocate indirect costs to specific projects for purposes of reimbursement. The United States Office of Management and Budget has acknowledged this difficulty and has established reimbursement principles and procedures in its “Circular No. A-21” to address the issue. Circular No. A-21 recognizes the following categories of indirect costs: (1) depreciation and use allowances; (2) operations and maintenance; (3) general administration expenses; (4) departmental administrative expenses; (5) sponsored projects administration; (6) library expenses; and (7) student administration and services.
The University uses the “predetermined rate” model to negotiate and recover indirect costs from the federal government, with the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) as its cognizant governmental agency for audit, negotiation and approval. Under the “predetermined rate” model, rates are negotiated in advance for an agreed upon period, which typically lasts several years. For example, following the most recent rate negotiation with DHHS, the University’s annual indirect cost recovery rates over the period from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2016, will be 63.0%, 64.0%, 64.0%, 64.5% and 65.0% of the modified total direct costs, respectively. The rate for the fiscal year starting in July 1, 2016, will default to 65.0% as a provisional rate until the University and DHHS negotiate a new series of predetermined rates.
An alternative methodology, the “fixed overhead rate with a roll forward” model, is used by institutions that work with the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research as their cognizant agency. Unlike the “predetermined rate” model, this latter approach utilizes a budgeted rate that is subject to future audits and adjustments when actual costs become available. Thus, under the “predetermined rate” model, the University does not remain exposed to future audits of indirect costs and the uncertainty of “open years” common to those institutions that use the “fixed overhead rate with a roll forward” model.
A-2
Investments
Investments of University funds are stated at market value (except for mortgages and gifts of real estate, which are stated at cost or fair market value on the date of gift) and are presented below by restriction. Unrestricted investments are those available to the University for any lawful purpose. Temporarily restricted investments consist of contributions received with donor restrictions that have not yet been satisfied, but that will ultimately be satisfied by passage of time, expenditure for a specified purpose, or both, and include such items as life income and annuity net assets. Permanently restricted investments consist of contributions received with donor restrictions that will not expire as a result of passage of time or expenditure for a specified purpose and include such items as true endowment and revolving student loan net assets.
Investment Summary
As of June 30, (dollars in thousands)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Unrestricted Investments $2,832,222 $2,655,604 $ 752,322 $ 880,533 $1,074,341 Temporarily Restricted Investments 59,505 54,306 765,177 874,835 1,187,095 Permanently Restricted Investments 1,179,367 1,226,887 1,258,977 1,315,029 1,389,181
Total Investments $4,071,094 $3,936,797 $2,776,476 $3,070,397 $3,650,617
Total investments have decreased by approximately 10% over the period from June 30, 2007, to June 30, 2011, due to the decline and subsequent gain in the equity markets from fall 2008 to the present. At June 30, 2011, the market value of the University’s endowment totaled approximately $3.5 billion, of which approximately $3.4 billion was in the endowment pool component and the remainder separately invested. The remainder of the total investments is primarily related to charitable vehicles of which the University is the ultimate beneficiary. Between June 30, 2010, and June 30, 2011, the market value of the endowment pool increased by 19.9%. See “Summary of Recent Events and Certain Potential Future Events” below for a discussion of more recent investment activity.
The University hired its first Chief Investment Officer (the “CIO”) in April 2011. See “Management – Senior Administration” for a biography of the appointee to this position. As part of the CIO’s review of the University endowment’s policies and procedures, the University’s Investment Policy Statement (the “IPS”), which governs the management of the endowment, was updated. As well documented procedures and controls provide the basic foundation for strong risk management practices, the updated IPS (i) focuses on the roles and responsibilities of the Investment Committee of the Board of Trustees and the Investment Office’s staff, (ii) clearly identifies the endowment’s performance measures, the asset allocation policy and rebalancing parameters, and (iii) includes a new section regarding risk management which identifies key risks and provides a framework for managing these risks.
Effective January 1, 2009, the State of California adopted its version of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (“UPMIFA”). This Act revised previously existing legislation relating to charitable endowment funds of not-for-profit organizations. In response to UPMIFA’s adoption across the country, in August 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position 117-1 entitled “Endowment of Not-for-Profit Organizations: Net Asset Classification of Funds Subject to an Enacted Version of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act, and Enhanced Disclosure for All Endowment Funds.” The University adopted this FASB Staff Position in its fiscal year 2009 financial statements. As a result, cumulative returns associated with donor-restricted endowment funds of approximately $675 million as of June 30, 2009, which previously had been reported as unrestricted net assets, were reclassified as temporarily restricted net assets. The University does not believe that this change in classification will affect the creditworthiness of its Bonds. See Appendix B to the Official Statement—“Financial Statements of the University of Southern California.”
A-3
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are comprised of the University’s property, buildings, library collections and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are funded by gifts, grants, unrestricted funds, proceeds from the sale of bonds and other borrowings.
Property, Plant and Equipment1
As of June 30, (dollars in thousands)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Property, Plant and Equipment $2,469,513 $2,665,561 $3,148,705 $3,382,719 $3,648,887 Less: Accumulated Depreciation 1,024,947 1,118,898 1,213,474 1,333,521 1,476,457 Property, Plant and Equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) $1,444,566 $1,546,663 $1,935,231 $2,049,198 $2,172,430 ______1 Beginning in fiscal year 2009, Property, Plant and Equipment and Accumulated Depreciation reflects the purchase of two hospitals in 2009 for approximately $275 million. See “USC Hospitals” below.
Debt Service Requirements
The University’s outstanding bonds and notes were approximately $973 million as of June 30, 2011. The University continually examines its overall liability management strategy in light of its project and working capital requirements, interest rates, and other factors.
For a summary of the debt service requirements on the University’s outstanding bonds and notes on a fiscal year basis which were payable as of June 30, 2011, see Note 5 set forth in Appendix B to the Official Statement— “Financial Statements of the University of Southern California.”
The University has also established a $200,000,000 unsecured line of credit with a major bank. This line, which matures on November 30, 2013, is for liquidity purposes and has not been used to date.
On August 17, 2011, the University issued $300 million of taxable bonds. The debt service payments on such bonds are interest only through 2110, at an interest rate of 5.25%, with a single principal payment due in 2111. See “Summary of Recent Events and Certain Potential Future Events” below.
Management
Board of Trustees
The University is governed by a self-perpetuating Board of Trustees presently comprised of 53 voting members. Life Trustees and Honorary Trustees, elected by the Board of Trustees pursuant to the bylaws of the University, may serve life terms and attend meetings of the Board of Trustees and its committees, but they are not members of the Board of Trustees and do not have votes on matters considered by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees is responsible for the overall management of the University including its academic policy, University development, long-range land use and resource planning, and supervision of financial and budgetary affairs.
The Board of Trustees annually elects a Chairman. The Board has several standing committees, including a Finance Committee, an Audit and Compliance Committee and an Executive Committee. The Executive Committee may act with the full power of the Board in most matters between meetings of the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees holds regular meetings on the first Wednesday in June (the Annual Meeting), October, December, and February.
A-4
Current voting members of the Board of Trustees are as follows:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Wallis Annenberg ...... Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Annenberg Foundation Wanda M. Austin ...... President and Chief Executive Officer, The Aerospace Corporation Lisa Barkett ...... Attorney and Community Leader Thomas J. Barrack Jr...... Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Colony Capital, LLC Marc R. Benioff ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, salesforce.com Joseph M. Boskovich...... Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, Old West Investment Management, LLC Gregory P. Brakovich ...... Chief Executive Officer, Crossroads Capital Group, LLC Rick J. Caruso ...... President and Chief Executive Officer, Caruso Affiliated Alan I. Casden ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Casden Properties LLC Ronnie C. Chan ...... Chairman, Hang Lung Group Limited and Hang Lung Properties Limited Yang Ho Cho ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Korean Air Christopher Cox ...... President, Bingham Consulting LLC, and Partner, Bingham McCutchen LLP Frank H. Cruz ...... President, Cruz & Associates Richard A. DeBeikes, Jr...... President, DeBeikes Investment Company David H. Dornsife...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Herrick Corporation Daniel J. Epstein ...... Chairman and Founder, ConAm Management Corporation Carol Campbell Fox ...... Educational Consultant Chengyu Fu ...... Chairman, China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group) Stanley P. Gold ...... President and Chief Executive Officer, Shamrock Holdings, Inc. Tamara Hughes Gustavson ...... Partner, American Commercial Equities Jane Harman ...... Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Ming Hsieh ...... Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman, Cogent, Inc. Ray R. Irani ...... Executive Chairman, Occidental Petroleum Corporation Suzanne Nora Johnson ...... Former Vice Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Lydia H. Kennard ...... Chairman, KDG Development & Construction Consulting Kenneth R. Klein ...... Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wind River Systems John Kusmiersky ...... President, The Brickstone Companies Daniel D. Lane ...... Chairman, Lane/Kuhn Pacific, Inc. Mónica C. Lozano ...... Publisher and Chief Executive Officer, ImpreMedia John C. Martin ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Kathleen L. McCarthy ...... Chairperson, Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Foundation Jamie McCourt ...... Founder, Jamie Enterprises John Mork ...... Chief Executive Officer, Energy Corporation of America Jerry W. Neely ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Retired), Smith International, Inc. C.L. Max Nikias ...... President, University of Southern California Robert Padgett ...... Emergency Physician (Retired) Jane Hoffman Popovich ...... Chairman, Hoffman Properties Blake Quinn ...... Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Quinn Group, Inc. Lorna Y. Reed ...... Community Leader Edward P. Roski, Jr. (Chairman) ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Majestic Realty Company Barbara J. Rossier ...... President, Rossier Enterprises William J. Schoen ...... Chairman, Health Management Associates, Inc. William E. B. Siart ...... Chairman, Excellent Education Development Robert H. Smith ...... Robert H. Smith Investments and Consulting Jeffrey H. Smulyan ...... Chairman, Emmis Communications Corp. Steven Spielberg ...... Principal Partner, DreamWorks SKG Mark A. Stevens ...... Managing Partner, SCubed Capital, and Former Managing Partner, Sequoia Capital Ronald D. Sugar ...... Chairman Emeritus, Northrop Grumman Corporation Ratan N. Tata ...... Chairman, Tata Sons Limited Daniel M. Tsai ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. Ronald N. Tutor ...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Tutor-Perini Corporation
A-5
Andrew J. Viterbi ...... President, Viterbi Group, LLC Willis B. Wood, Jr...... Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Retired), Pacific Enterprises
LIFE TRUSTEES (Non-Voting)
Malcolm R. Currie Joan Payden Gavin S. Herbert Frank Price B. Wayne Hughes, Sr. Allen E. Puckett John F. King Bruce M. Ramer William Lyon Carl E. Reichardt Alfred E. Mann Steven B. Sample Gordon S. Marshall Forrest N. Shumway Harlyne J. Norris Richard J. Stegemeier Toshiaki Ogasawara Peter V. Ueberroth J. Douglas Pardee Gin D. Wong
HONORARY TRUSTEES (Non-Voting)
Verna B. Dauterive Merwyn C. Gill Helene J. Galen Carmen H. Warschaw
Senior Administration
The President of the University is appointed by the Board of Trustees and, as Chief Executive Officer, is charged with the principal responsibility for administration of the University. The Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, the Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, the Senior Vice President, University Advancement, the Senior Vice President, Administration, the Senior Vice President, University Relations, and the Secretary are officers of the University elected by the Board of Trustees upon nomination by the President and are subject to the day-to-day direction of the President. The Athletic Director, the Chief Investment Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health, are appointed by the President. The following table sets forth the names of the senior administration of the University, the current position held by each of them, and the year of appointment to that position. A brief statement of each individual’s background is included below the table.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION
Year of Appointment/ Name Position Election
C. L. Max Nikias President of the University 2010 Elizabeth Garrett Provost and Senior Vice President, Academic Affairs 2010 Robert Abeles Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer 2010 Albert R. Checcio Senior Vice President, University Advancement 2010 Todd R. Dickey Senior Vice President, Administration 2005 Patrick C. Haden Athletic Director 2010 Thomas Jackiewicz Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC 2012 Health Lisa Mazzocco Chief Investment Officer 2011 Thomas S. Sayles Senior Vice President, University Relations 2011 Carol Mauch Amir General Counsel and Secretary of the University 2008
C. L. MAX NIKIAS – President of the University of Southern California. Dr. Nikias became the eleventh president of the University on August 3, 2010. He is the holder of the Robert C. Packard President’s Chair and the Malcolm R. Currie Chair in Technology and the Humanities. As president, Dr. Nikias has committed to establishing
A-6
USC as a major engine of American economic, cultural and social development; as a preeminent global American university and a dynamic crossroads within an emerging Pacific era; as a top center for academic medicine; and as a world leader in innovations that are fueled by the creative encounter of a vast range of disciplines. Dr. Nikias’ first year as president was highlighted by the donation of seven transformative gifts to the University, including (a) a $200 million gift from Dana and David Dornsife to name USC’s College of Letter, Arts and Sciences, the single largest donation in the University’s history, (b) a $150 million gift from the W.M. Keck Foundation for medicine, and (c) a $110 million gift from Julie and John Mork to support student scholarships. These gifts contributed to the University raising an unprecedented total of approximately $1 billion during Dr. Nikias’ first year.
In his second year as president, USC attracted another series of major gifts, highlighted by a $50 million gift from the Price Family Charitable Fund to USC’s School of Policy, Planning, and Development, which was renamed the USC Sol Price School of Public Policy. The University also expanded its partnerships with academic institutions from China to Israel, recruited world-class leadership for its academic medical enterprise and continued to expand its facilities through the construction of the John McKay Center and numerous new academic buildings.
Dr. Nikias was instrumental in bringing the Shoah Foundation, originally established by filmmaker and USC trustee Steven Spielberg, to USC. The USC Shoah Foundation Institute’s repository of 52,000 testimonies of Holocaust survivors represents the world’s largest visual archives digital library. Dr. Nikias also established the Edward R. Roybal Institute for Applied Gerontology, the USC Stevens Center for Innovation, the U.S.-China Institute, and the Levan Institute for Humanities and Ethics. He launched Visions and Voices, USC’s campus-wide arts and humanities initiative, as well as a grant program to advance scholarship in the humanities and social sciences. Dr. Nikias spearheaded the integration of the Keck School of Medicine’s faculty practice plans, oversaw the transfer of USC University Hospital (now known as Keck Hospital of USC) and Norris Cancer Hospital from Tenet Healthcare Corporation to the University, and recruited a new leadership team for USC’s medical enterprise. He currently chairs the USC Hospitals Governing Board.
Dr. Nikias previously served as USC’s provost and chief academic officer since June 2005, in which role he was charged with accelerating the academic momentum that the University has experienced in recent years. He was credited with recruiting new academic leadership; strengthening the academic medical enterprise; attracting a series of major donations to the institution; creating innovative cross-disciplinary programs, enhancing the university’s globalization efforts; and increasing support for students at the undergraduate, graduate and doctoral levels. Dr. Nikias joined the University faculty in 1991 and, from 2001 to 2005, served as dean of the USC Viterbi School of Engineering.
Over his two-decade career as an active scholar, Dr. Nikias was internationally recognized for his pioneering research on digital signal processing, digital media systems, and biomedicine. He was founding director of two national research centers at USC: the NSF-funded Integrated Media Systems Center and the Department of Defense-funded Center for Research on Applied Signal Processing. He served as a senior consultant to a range of corporations and as a high-level consultant to the U.S. government, holding a security clearance for 15 years. The author of more than 275 journal articles and conference papers, three textbooks, and eight patents, Dr. Nikias has mentored more than 30 Ph.D. and postdoctoral students. Before coming to USC, he held faculty appointments at the University of Connecticut and Northeastern University.
Dr. Nikias is a member of the National Academy of Engineering and a fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the California Council on Science and Technology. Among other honors, he has received the IEEE Simon Ramo Medal, the University at Buffalo’s Clifford C. Furnas Memorial Award, the American Hellenic Council’s Aristeio Award, and the USC Black Alumni Association’s Thomas Kilgore Service Award. He also received a commendation for cutting-edge research from the governor of California. Dr. Nikias graduated with honors from Famagusta Gymnasium, and received a diploma from the National Technical University of Athens, also known as National Metsovion Polytechnic, and later earned his M.S. and Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He holds an honorary doctorate from the University of Cyprus.
ELIZABETH GARRETT – Provost and Senior Vice President, Academic Affairs for the University. Ms. Garrett was elected provost on October 28, 2010. She is the holder of the Frances R. and John J. Duggan Professor in the USC Gould School of Law. As the University’s second-ranking officer, she oversees the USC Dornsife
A-7
College of Letters, Arts and Sciences as well as the Keck Medical Center of USC and 16 other professional schools, in addition to the divisions of student affairs, libraries, information technology, research, student religious life and enrollment services. Since her election, Provost Garrett has directed substantial new efforts to hire transformative faculty, with the goal of catalyzing targeted fields of interdisciplinary scholarship and invigorating USC’s research environment. She has accelerated the recruitment of Provost Professors and created the Provost’s Post-Doctoral Scholars Program in the Humanities. She was also instrumental in the University’s purchase of two hospitals, which now comprise much of the clinical practice of the Keck Medical Center of USC.
Before joining the faculty of USC, Provost Garrett was a professor of law at the University of Chicago, where she also served as deputy dean for academic affairs. She has been a visiting professor at Harvard Law School, the University of Virginia Law School, Central European University in Budapest, and the Interdisciplinary Center Law School in Israel. Her primary scholarly interests include the legislative process, direct democracy and the design of democratic institutions, the federal budget process and tax policy. Provost Garrett is a fellow of the American Law Institute, a life fellow of the American Bar Foundation, and a member of the Pacific Council for International Policy. In 2011, she was elected a Harold Lasswell Fellow of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Before entering academics, she clerked for Justice Thurgood Marshall on the U.S. Supreme Court, and she served as legal counsel and legislative director for Senator David L. Boren (D-Okla.).
ROBERT ABELES – Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of the University. Mr. Abeles was elected in August 2010, having served a 19-month term as interim senior vice president and chief financial officer since January 2009. Reporting directly to the president, he oversees a wide variety of financial functions at the University, including budget and planning, the treasury department, the University comptroller, financial and business services, and facilities management services and capital construction.
Mr. Abeles’ background in strategic planning, corporate finance and business development spans both the commercial and nonprofit sectors. He began a 24-year tenure at First Interstate Bank in 1972, rising to the position of executive vice president and chief financial officer. Subsequent positions have included service as director, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Transamerica Life Companies, executive vice president and chief financial officer of KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc., and, most recently, interim executive vice president for finance and administration and chief financial officer of The J. Paul Getty Trust.
He currently serves as a member of the board of directors for ExED, a development, business and management services company that specializes in charter school creation and enhancement, and as a member of the board of trustees for Flintridge Preparatory School in La Cañada, California. Mr. Abeles holds a B.A. degree in economics as well as an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.
ALBERT R. CHECCIO – Senior Vice President, University Advancement. Mr. Checcio was elected on August 23, 2010, and is responsible for overseeing advancement operations and directing USC’s relations with the philanthropic and volunteer communities, including prominent individual supporters, charitable foundations, corporate donors and alumni. He reports directly to the president, works closely with the provost and the deans in developing plans and infrastructure to support the University’s development ambitions, and staffs the Development Committee of the USC Board of Trustees. He is also charged with organizing and launching the largest fundraising campaign in USC’s history.
For five years before joining USC, Mr. Checcio was vice president of development and university relations at Fordham University. His previous experience encompasses the design and execution of fundraising campaigns at a number of universities – including American University in Washington, D.C., Temple University in Philadelphia, the University of Pittsburgh and Drexel University – and service as vice president of development at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Mr. Checcio holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Drexel University.
TODD R. DICKEY – Senior Vice President, Administration of the University. Mr. Dickey is responsible for providing leadership for the University’s administrative departments, including: general counsel; auxiliary services (bookstore, housing, transportation, hospitality services, hotel); administrative operations (human resources, compensation, benefits, employee relations, equity and diversity, childcare, center for work and family life); career and protective services (public safety, risk management, environmental health and safety, fire safety and emergency
A-8
planning, recruitment, professional development); compliance; internal audit; trademarks and licensing services; real estate and asset management; information security; athletic compliance; and university secretary.
Mr. Dickey joined USC in the general counsel’s office in 1996, was made interim general counsel in 1998, was named general counsel in 1999, was elected vice president and secretary of the university in 2001 and became senior vice president for administration in April 2005. From 1994 to 1996, he was an associate at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP. In 1993-1994, he was judicial clerk to the Honorable Ronald S. W. Lew, U.S. District Court judge for the Central District of California in Los Angeles.
Mr. Dickey is a member of the California State Bar, the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the National Association of College and University Attorneys, the National Association of College and University Business Officers and the Council on Governmental Relations. He is certified to appear before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. District Court, Central and Northern districts of California. He is a past member of the Executive Committee of the Corporate Law Department of the Los Angeles County Bar Association. Mr. Dickey earned his B.A. degree in political science from UC Irvine in 1987 and his J.D. degree from the USC Gould School of Law in 1993, where he graduated Order of the Coif and was a member of the law review.
PATRICK C. HADEN – Athletic Director of the University. Mr. Haden was named USC’s seventh athletic director effective August 3, 2010, charged with overseeing the University’s 19 women’s and men’s athletic teams. Mr. Haden also holds a joint faculty appointment in the USC Marshall School of Business and the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, where he is available to lecture and teach courses as well as to work with faculty on developing new curricula in areas such as sports business and sports journalism.
A Trojan alumnus, Mr. Haden played a prominent role as quarterback and team leader during one of USC’s golden eras of athletic achievement. He was a two-time Academic All-American in football, graduated magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from USC, and received a Rhodes Scholarship to study philosophy, politics and economics at Oxford University. He earned his law degree from Loyola Law School in 1982.
Mr. Haden played professionally in the NFL for the Los Angeles Rams from 1976 to 1981. He then moved on to take a position as a sportscaster at CBS, later becoming well known as NBC’s color commentator for Notre Dame football.
Since 1987, Mr. Haden has been a general partner at Riordan, Lewis & Haden, a private equity firm that invests in high-growth middle-market companies, playing a key role in the development of privately held and publicly traded portfolio companies. A noted civic leader, Mr. Haden has served on many nonprofit boards, including those of the Rose Hills Foundation and the Fletcher Jones Foundation, both of which support California colleges and universities. As a member of the USC Board of Trustees from 1991 to 2010, Mr. Haden was a longtime chairman of the Academic Affairs and Student Affairs committees, serving as a key adviser to two University provosts. He also chaired a fund-raising initiative for the USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
THOMAS JACKIEWICZ – Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health. Effective as of January 1, 2012, Mr. Jackiewicz serves as the Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health, reporting directly to the president. Mr. Jackiewicz is primarily responsible for oversight of the University’s private-practice clinical activities, including the Keck Hospital of USC, USC Norris Cancer Hospital and Keck Medical Center of USC. He is also a member of the Keck Medicine Oversight Committee and serves as Vice Chair of the USC Hospitals Governing Board.
Before joining USC, Jackiewicz was chief executive officer of UC San Diego Health System (encompassing UC San Diego Medical Center, UC San Diego Thornton Hospital, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego Shiley Eye Center, and UC San Diego Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center) and associate vice chancellor of University of California, San Diego, Health Sciences. Prior to this, he served as chief operating officer of Columbia University Medical Center and as senior associate chair for finance and administration for the department of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine. Earlier in his career, he held leadership positions at Oregon Health Sciences University and the University of Pennsylvania Health System.
A-9
Mr. Jackiewicz has served as national chair of the Association of American Medical Colleges’ Group on Business Affairs. He is currently a board member of the University Health System Consortium and the Hospital Association of San Diego and Imperial Counties, and a member of the Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems. He also serves on the board of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, San Diego. In addition, he was elected to serve as chair of the Founder’s Board of the Dr. Foster 2011 Global Comparators Project, a board composed of CEOs and other leaders from 31 top-ranked hospitals in five countries. He earned his master of public health in health policy and management from Columbia University and his bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Georgia.
LISA MAZZOCCO – Chief Investment Officer of the University. Ms. Mazzocco was named USC’s first chief investment officer effective April 18, 2011. Reporting directly to the president and working closely with the University’s chief financial officer and the investment committee of the USC Board of Trustees, Ms. Mazzocco is charged with building a staff that will bolster the investment function of USC’s endowment in support of the University’s academic aspirations. She also advises the investment and finance committees of the USC Board of Trustees with respect to endowment performance, and chairs the University’s retirement oversight committee.
Before joining USC, Ms. Mazzocco was chief investment officer for the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (“LACERA”), where she had worked since 1992. At LACERA, she was responsible for asset allocation of a $31 billion pension fund, working with the association’s Board of Investments to develop implementation plans for its investment strategies. She previously served as a senior analyst at Security Pacific National Bank, and began her career at Wilshire Associates. Ms. Mazzocco holds an M.B.A. from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and a bachelor’s degree from San Diego State University.
THOMAS S. SAYLES – Senior Vice President, University Relations. Mr. Sayles was elected senior vice president for University relations effective July 1, 2011. In this capacity, he provides strategic direction and leadership for USC’s public relations, outreach and reputation.
From March 2009 until July 2011, Mr. Sayles served as vice president for government and civic engagement. He continues to oversee the University’s civic-engagement and government-relations enterprise as well as efforts to strengthen USC’s relationships with external stakeholders.
Previously, Mr. Sayles practiced law in the private and public sectors. He left the practice of law to serve as California’s commissioner of corporations and later as secretary of business, transportation and housing. He then returned to the private sector to work for many years for Sempra Energy as vice president of government and community affairs and as senior vice president of consumer marketing. Immediately prior to joining USC, Sayles was senior vice president for government affairs and corporate communications at Rentech, Inc., an alternative fuels company headquartered in Los Angeles. In July 2009, he was appointed by Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to serve on the governing board of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the country’s largest municipally-owned utility. Mr. Sayles also has been appointed by three different California governors to serve on boards and commissions, including the University of California Board of Regents, the California Community Colleges Board of Trustees and the Commission on Building for the 21st Century.
Mr. Sayles currently is a member of the board of directors of Unified Grocers, the largest buying cooperative for independent grocers in the Western United States. He previously served on the boards of directors of Golden State Bancorp (California Federal Bank) and Glendale Federal Bank. Born and raised in South Los Angeles, not far from USC’s University Park campus, Mr. Sayles earned a law degree from Harvard Law School and a bachelor’s degree “with distinction” from Stanford University, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.
CAROL MAUCH AMIR – General Counsel and Secretary of the University. Ms. Amir was elected secretary of the University by the USC Board of Trustees in October 2006 and named general counsel by the president in March 2008. As general counsel, Ms. Amir is responsible for: overseeing all legal matters for the University and hospitals, which include advising the University’s president, board of trustees and senior administrators regarding legal issues; supervising University attorneys and general counsel’s office staff; representing USC in legal proceedings and negotiations; overseeing litigation management, corporate transactions, and University grievance and complaint processes; and assessing legal risks of University activities and making
A-10
policy recommendations to reduce those risks. She oversees the provision of legal services on tax issues, personnel matters, corporate formalities and conflicts of interest, healthcare regulatory issues, intellectual property matters, NCAA issues, research issues and corporate compliance programs. She is also responsible for supervision of the University’s office of trademarks and licensing services. As secretary of the University, she is responsible for maintaining all corporate records and monitoring corporate filings of USC and its numerous subsidiaries.
Ms. Amir joined the University as a University counsel in 1999, before becoming associate general counsel in 2001 and managing general counsel in 2005. From 1994 to 1999, she was an associate at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, specializing in healthcare-related corporate transactions. Ms. Amir earned a B.A. in psychology from Wesleyan University in 1990, and graduated cum laude from New York University School of Law in 1994.
Applications, Enrollments, Tuition and Financial Aid
Applications
The following table provides a five-year summary of undergraduate and graduate applications, admissions and enrollments at the University.
Historical Application Pool
For Undergraduate(1) Graduate(2) Academic Year Applications Admissions Enrollments Applications Admissions Enrollments
2007-08 42,109 10,337 4,077 35,153 10,243 5,039 2008-09 44,207 10,311 4,280 36,746 10,595 5,686 2009-10 45,277 11,189 4,239 39,993 12,318 6,502 2010-11 45,401 11,274 4,458 45,046 13,011 6,988 2011-12 47,664 11,150 4,374 34,420 13,692 6,281 ______(1) In 1996, the University adopted a two-part undergraduate application process for the class entering in the fall of 1997. Using this process, undergraduate applicants may initially apply to the University by submitting Part 1 of the application. In order to be eligible for admission, however, students must also submit the remainder of the application contained in Part 2. 33,045 of the 41,757 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2006 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. 33,909 of the 42,109 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2007 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. 35,500 of the 44,207 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2008 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. 36,496 of the 45,277 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2009 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. 38,228 of the 45,401 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2010 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. 41,211 of the 47,664 applicants for the undergraduate class entering the fall of 2011 completed the application process by submitting Part 2. (2) Graduate data for 2011-12 does not include professional students.
Last year, USC adopted the Common Application for all prospective undergraduate students wishing to enroll during the 2012-13 academic year. The Common Application provides prospective students with an easy-to- use online platform that allows them to apply to many colleges while only completing one set of forms (as well as supplemental information for each college). The result is less confusion and more efficiency for students, high school counselors and college admission offices. Not only has the Common Application introduced much efficiency into our application processing, it has allowed us to expose USC to tens of thousands more high school seniors than USC’s previous application did.
The Common Application Association develops and maintains the Common Application system. This non- profit membership organization was established in 1975 by 15 private colleges that aimed to provide a common, standardized undergraduate application form for use at any member institution. Since its founding, the association’s membership has grown to 456 colleges and universities. Member schools represent a broad cross-section of the American higher education landscape, both public and private. The Common Application is almost universally
A-11
accepted by elite private colleges and universities (presently, the only highly selective private universities not using the Common Application are Georgetown and MIT).
See “Summary of Recent Events and Certain Potential Future Events” below for a discussion of recent application increases.
In fall 2011, the mean grade point average for enrolled freshmen was 3.72 (on a 4.0 scale) and the 25th to 75th range of Scholastic Aptitude Test scores (math plus verbal) was 1970 to 2180.
Enrollments
The following table lists total regular session student headcount enrollments for the fall semester for the current and each of the past four academic years. Based on information on applicants for the Fall of 2011 presented above, the University expects that the enrollment of both undergraduate and graduate students will remain relatively consistent with only slight increases and/or decreases as reflected below for prior years.
Student Enrollments
Students 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Undergraduate 16,384 16,608 16,751 17,380 17,414 Graduate/Law/Professional/Other 17,024 17,139 18,073 19,516 20,596
Total Enrollment 33,408 33,747 34,824 36,896 38,010
Tuition
The following table presents full-time undergraduate tuition rates for the upcoming and each of the past five academic years.
Undergraduate Tuition Rates1
Academic Year Tuition Per Full-Time2 Student Percent Increase
2007-08 35,212 5.7% 2008-09 37,096 5.4% 2009-10 38,570 4.0% 2010-11 40,384 4.7% 2011-12 42,162 4.4% 2012-13 43,722 3.7% ______1 Graduate tuition rates, while significant, are not included due to the wide range of programs offered at varying tuition rates. 2 Full-time undergraduate students are those who carry 24-36 units per academic year.
Tuition rates are determined in the University’s budgeting process in conjunction with an analysis of projected expenses and the revenues necessary to satisfy such expenses, and, similar to previous academic years, the University will institute an increase in tuition rates for the Fall of 2012 (as reflected in the table above). For the 2011-12 academic year, other undergraduate student expenditures include a mandatory fee of $656, average room and board expenses of $12,078, and other expenses of approximately $2,980, including books, transportation and personal expenses. The total annual cost per full-time residential undergraduate student was approximately $57,876 in the 2011-12 academic year. In academic year 2012-13, mandatory fees will increase to $741 and room and board will increase to $12,440.
A-12
Financial Aid
To assist families with financing a USC education, the University’s undergraduate financial aid policy is designed to meet 100% of student demonstrated financial need (as verified by the University) for all undergraduate students. The Financial Aid Office provides student aid and services to all students through the awarding of University, federal and state need-based grants, merit scholarships, self-help (including federal work-study and federal direct loans), and other student and parent financing options.
During the academic year 2011-12, 68% of all undergraduate students attending the University received some form of financial assistance. The University awarded over $450 million of financial aid to undergraduate students from federal, state, University, and private sources. The largest single source of non-University grant aid in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, the California State Scholarship Program (“Cal Grants”), provided approximately $18.8 million in grants to undergraduate students. Graduate students were awarded more than $659 million in financial assistance in 2011-12, including federal direct loans, state, federal and private grants, University scholarships, fellowships, and assistantships, as well as private loans.
Federal and state financial aid programs are subject to changing laws and regulations, and accordingly, future financial assistance from these sources is difficult to forecast. Should federal or state financial aid be reduced dramatically, there could be an adverse impact on University enrollment or finances. While the University does not expect dramatic fluctuations in state or federal funding, some reductions may be expected given the current budget climate. The California state budget for fiscal year 2013 recently approved by the governor includes a 5% reduction in Cal Grants for 2012-13, with further reductions planned in future years. Due to the political climate around the state budget process, it is difficult to predict whether the approved reductions will be made. Congress continues to debate Pell Grant funding, but no major reductions have been proposed or passed, and it is not likely that there will be any further changes at the federal level until after the 2012 presidential election.
The University funds undergraduate grant aid from tuition revenue and expects enrollment and tuition to be consistent with previous years. Therefore, the University does not anticipate a reduction in the amount of University aid that will be available for the 2012-13 academic year. In fact, the amount budgeted for student aid has increased over the last three years, in order to meet the University’s priority to provide adequate financial aid packages to its students. The University anticipates strong continued University funding of student aid.
Insurance
The University maintains insurance with such coverage as it believes is customarily carried by similar private colleges and universities in California. Due to the prohibitive industry-wide cost of earthquake insurance and the size of required deductibles, the University does not carry earthquake insurance. The major structures, at the time of construction, met then-current building code standards, and substantially all of the buildings on campus have been upgraded as required by City of Los Angeles ordinances. Nonetheless, a major earthquake affecting the Los Angeles area could have an impact on the structural integrity of the buildings on the University’s campus.
Litigation
The University is currently involved in various lawsuits involving liability claims. Management believes that no litigation currently pending against the University, even if decided unfavorably to the University, would have a material adverse impact on the financial position of the University.
USC Hospitals
In April of 2009, the University purchased two hospitals, USC University Hospital (“UH”) and USC Norris Cancer Hospital (“Norris” and together with UH collectively referred to as the “Hospitals”), that are located on the University’s Health Sciences Campus to create an integrated academic medical center, enhancing the quality of patient care and elevating the Keck School of Medicine of USC to a nationally acclaimed leader among the nation’s medical schools. In fiscal year 2011, the revenues from the Hospitals contributed approximately 15% of the University’s total revenues.
A-13
UH opened in 1991 as a 261-bed hospital. In 2007, a 150-bed clinical tower was added to increase capacity at UH to 411 beds. UH is a tertiary/quaternary referral hospital that specializes in cardiac, oncology, transplant, neurosurgical, urological and orthopedic surgery.
Norris, a 60-bed hospital, is home to a National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center and is one of eleven hospitals in the nation having an exemption from the Medicare prospective payment system.
The UH facility is 21 years old and does not require substantial repairs or upgrades in order to remain in compliance with building codes and other applicable laws. Norris is housed in a facility that is 30 years old, and it is the University’s intention to make additional improvements to the Norris facility for modernization and service- related upgrades. University expenditures for the Hospitals for working capital and capital improvements, including the costs associated with the implementation of an electronic medical record system, which is scheduled to go live the fall of 2012, was approximately $242 million through June of 2012.
In 2011, the University received a $150 million naming gift from the W. M. Keck Foundation to accelerate groundbreaking medical, clinical and translational research and education. In recognition of this transformative gift, USC’s academic medical enterprise was named Keck Medicine of USC. Keck Medicine of USC includes the Keck School of Medicine and the Keck Medical Center of USC. The Keck Medical Center is comprised of UH, which was renamed Keck Hospital of USC (“Keck Hospital”), Norris and USC’s faculty practice plan, USC Care Medical Group, Inc.
In 2012, the University hired a Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health who reports directly to the University President. The Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health is responsible for oversight of the University’s private-practice clinical activities, including those at Keck Hospital and Norris. The University also appointed the long-standing Chief Operating Officer for the Hospitals as the new Chief Executive Officer for the Hospitals, to whom the existing hospital management team reports, and who reports to the Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for USC Health.
The Hospitals are staffed by University-employed physicians. The University’s faculty practice plan includes approximately 645 physicians, and, in addition to staffing Keck Hospital and Norris, University physicians staff LAC+USC Medical Center, which is owned and operated by the County of Los Angeles. Located adjacent to the University's Health Sciences Campus, LAC+USC Medical Center is the site of the nation's largest single-site residency training program at Los Angeles County Hospital and is co-sponsored by the University.
See “Summary of Recent Events and Certain Potential Future Events” below for a discussion of a potential hospital acquisition.
The following table shows data regarding the utilization at both Hospitals.
As of June 30,
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Licensed Beds 396 471 471 471 471 Percent Occupancy 45% 39% 40% 43% 44% Admissions 8,987 8,854 9,088 9,816 10,140 Average Length of Stay 7.19 7.61 7.58 7.48 7.46 Patient Days 64,648 67,371 68,909 73,463 75,605 Surgeries 5,364 5,387 5,388 6,109 6,316 Ambulatory Surgeries 5,387 5,300 5,961 6,799 6,962
The University intends to continue Keck Medical Center’s relationships with all third party payers, including participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. As of May 2012, the current payer mix, based on
A-14
admissions, at the Hospitals is 38% Medicare, 53% managed care and commercial insurance, 6% Medicaid, and 3% other.
Keck Medical Center is a priority of the University as it implements necessary or appropriate strategic investments. Physician recruiting is a key component of the growth strategy and has been successful to date. Occupancy at the Hospitals is expected to further increase with physician recruiting. Development of a new strategic plan for Keck Medical Center is underway with completion scheduled for the end of calendar year 2012 or the beginning of calendar year 2013.
Summary of Recent Events and Certain Potential Future Events
The University’s fiscal year ended on June 30, 2012. While fiscal year 2012 audited financial results are not yet available, the University anticipates that its operating results will be consistent with recent audited fiscal year results.
As of July 2012, undergraduate application totals have reached record highs. The number of freshman applicants has surpassed 46,000, exceeding last year’s freshman total by more than 20%. This significant increase is due primarily to increased high school recruitment activity, as well as USC’s adoption of the Common Application (see discussion under “Applications” above). Transfer applications hit USC record levels as well, exceeding 8,200, a modest increase over the previous year. Undergraduate tuition has been increased by 3.7% to $43,722, and mandatory fees, room and board rates have also been increased.
The University expects investment returns to remain low and relatively flat for the immediate term, consistent with industry benchmarks and the University’s peer groups. The estimated fiscal year 2012 returns on the endowment pool are 0%.
Fundraising performance has also been strong over the past fiscal year. It is expected that USC will complete its second highest fundraising year ever in its fiscal year 2012, with $600 million in commitments. The University is in its second year of a historic campaign that is expected to raise $6 billion. USC had a record fundraising year in the campaign’s first year, fiscal year 2011, with over $1 billion raised. Since the start of the campaign, 25 gifts of $10 million or more have been announced, three of which were $100 million or more.
Funding from sponsored contracts and grants over the past fiscal year has been consistent with fiscal year 2011 performance.
On August 17, 2011, the University issued $300 million of taxable bonds. The bonds were issued utilizing a unique financing structure referred to as “Century Bonds.” These bonds were issued with a 100-year maturity structure scheduled to mature on October 1, 2111. The debt service payments on the bonds are interest only through 2110 with a single principal payment due in 2111. This unique structure provided the University with the ability to take advantage of historically-low interest rates. The bonds were well accepted by the investor community and successfully priced at an attractive interest rate of 5.25%. The bonds are also subject to optional redemption prior to their stated maturity as they were sold with a make-whole call provision. The bond proceeds will be used to support the University’s ongoing capital improvement program and refinance existing debt obligations.
In September 2009, a general IRS audit was initiated with the University. The audit was completed in May 2012 and did not have a material adverse impact on the University’s financial condition or operations or on the University’s status as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.
The University is considering the acquisition of Verdugo Hills Hospital in Glendale, California, a small, independent, acute-care hospital, as part of its plan for growth and expansion of Keck Medicine of USC. University management is currently conducting a preliminary analysis of the potential acquisition and a plan of action has not been yet been approved by the Board of Trustees. If pursued, the University will most likely fund the acquisition and capital improvements from working capital. If acquired, University management expects that the addition of this facility will potentially improve the overall financial results of Keck Medicine of USC and further enhance its reputation as an integrated academic medical center and leading medical school.
A-15
The preliminary financial data (excluding financial data gathered from any audited financials for any fiscal year up to and including fiscal year 2011) included in this Appendix A has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, the University of Southern California's management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not audited, reviewed, compiled or performed any procedures with respect to such accompanying preliminary financial data. Accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.
A-16
APPENDIX B
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Report of Independent Auditors
The Board of Trustees of the University of Southern California In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of activities, and cash flows, which appears on pages 17 through 33, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the University of Southern California and its subsidiaries (the “university”) at June 30, 2011, and the changes in their consolidated net assets and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the university’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The prior year summarized comparative informa- tion has been derived from the university’s 2010 financial statements, and in our report dated September 30, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Los Angeles, California October 19, 2011
B-1 Consolidated Balance Sheet in thousands
June 30 June 30 2011 2010 Assets A B 1 Cash and cash equivalents $889,233 $742,409 2 Accounts receivable 273,988 229,614 3 Notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, $7,367 (2011), $9,841 (2010) 83,620 84,433 4 Pledges receivable 434,356 177,095 5 Investments 3,650,617 3,070,397 6 Inventories, prepaid expenses and other assets 148,488 111,080 7 Property, plant and equipment, net 2,172,430 2,049,198 8 Total Assets $7,652,732 $6,464,226
Liabilities 9 Accounts payable $145,338 $138,686 10 Accrued liabilities 273,122 187,797 11 Refundable advances 18,501 41,187 12 Current portion of long-term debt 5,280 3,885 13 Deposits and deferred revenue 131,673 121,663 14 Actuarial liability for annuities payable 143,303 137,195 15 Federal student loan funds 67,812 67,825 16 Asset retirement obligations 97,691 93,831 17 Capital lease obligation 60,696 0 18 Long-term debt 968,081 919,890 19 Other liabilities 12,377 15,335 20 Total Liabilities 1,923,874 1,727,294
Net Assets 21 Unrestricted 2,644,220 2,288,314 22 Temporarily restricted 1,449,152 1,039,472 23 Permanently restricted 1,635,486 1,409,146 24 Total Net Assets 5,728,858 4,736,932
25 Total Liabilities and Net Assets $7,652,732 $6,464,226
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
B-2 Consolidated Statement of Activities in thousands
Year Ended Year Ended June 30, 2011 June 30, 2010 Temporarily Permanently Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Total Total Net Assets Net Assets Net Assets Net Assets Net Assets Revenues A B C D E 1 Student tuition and fees $1,267,545 $1,267,545 $1,152,480 2 Less financial aid (356,859) (356,859) (325,467) 3 Net student tuition and fees 910,686 910,686 827,013 4 Endowment income 53,200 53,200 50,094 5 Investment and other income 4,505 $184 4,689 10,885 6 Net appreciation in fair value of investments 218,946 $386,211 19,801 624,958 296,456 7 Government contracts and grants 350,827 350,827 285,571 8 Recovery of indirect costs 132,254 132,254 118,896 9 Gifts and pledges 318,325 145,990 216,952 681,267 491,309 10 Sales and service 31,029 31,029 31,221 11 Auxiliary enterprises 243,011 243,011 225,363 12 Health care services 811,538 811,538 713,291 13 Other 95,705 95,705 89,813 14 Present value adjustment to annuities payable (3,194) (13,305) (16,499) (10,764) 15 Net assets released from restrictions/redesignations 116,619 (119,327) 2,708 16 Total Revenues 3,286,645 409,680 226,340 3,922,665 3,129,148
Expenses 17 Educational and general activities 1,931,735 1,931,735 1,800,354 18 Health care services 799,944 799,944 714,606 19 Depreciation and amortization 153,647 153,647 142,471 20 Interest on indebtedness 45,413 45,413 40,842 21 Total Expenses 2,930,739 2,930,739 2,698,273
22 Increase in Net Assets 355,906 409,680 226,340 991,926 430,875 23 Beginning Net Assets 2,288,314 1,039,472 1,409,146 4,736,932 4,306,057 24 Ending Net Assets $2,644,220 $1,449,152 $1,635,486 $5,728,858 $4,736,932
Nature of specific net assets: 25 Internally designated $71,225 $71,225 $52,049 26 Gift and departmental 454,026 454,026 444,993 27 Externally restricted $38,953 $35,053 74,006 81,659 28 Pledges 223,104 211,252 434,356 177,095 29 Unexpended endowment income 181,710 181,710 163,490 30 Annuity and living trusts 46,628 81,782 128,410 114,763 31 True endowment and net appreciation 1,140,467 1,307,399 2,447,866 2,075,101 32 Funds functioning as endowment 1,069,307 1,069,307 872,877 33 Debt service funds 71,794 71,794 70,887 34 Invested in plant 796,158 796,158 684,018 35 $2,644,220 $1,449,152 $1,635,486 $5,728,858 $4,736,932
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
B-3 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in thousands
Year Ended Year Ended June 30, 2011 June 30, 2010 Cash Flows from Operating Activities A B 1 Change in Net Assets $991,926 $430,875 Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash provided by operating activities: 2 Depreciation and amortization 153,647 142,471 3 Loss on the disposal/sale of plant assets 2,606 6,247 4 In-kind receipt of securities, property, plant and equipment (26,946) (30,097) 5 Present value adjustment to annuities payable 16,536 10,723 6 Increase in accounts receivable (44,374) (50,018) 7 Increase in pledges receivable (281,494) (11,421) 8 Increase in inventories, prepaid expenses and other assets (27,878) (17,277) 9 Increase in accounts payable 5,813 13,189 10 Increase in accrued liabilities 22,579 32,310 11 Decrease in refundable advances (22,686) (2,679) 12 Increase in deposits and deferred revenue 10,010 9,794 13 (Decrease) increase in other liabilities (2,958) 315 14 Contributions restricted for property, plant and equipment and permanent investment (89,958) (119,366) 15 Net realized gain on sale of investments (162,941) (103,475) 16 Net unrealized (appreciation) in investments (462,197) (193,212) 17 Net cash provided by operating activities 81,685 118,379
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 18 Proceeds from note collections 12,551 10,987 19 Notes issued (9,264) (8,831) 20 Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments 1,980,419 1,350,095 21 Purchase of investments (1,859,665) (1,314,906) 22 Purchase of property, plant and equipment (212,238) (248,036) 23 Net cash used by investing activities (88,197) (210,691)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities Contributions restricted for permanent investment: 24 Endowment 69,468 63,104 25 Plant 40,743 79,633 26 Trusts and other 3,980 4,768 27 Repayment of long-term debt (3,885) (94,050) 28 Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 53,471 104,558 29 (Decrease) increase in federal student loan funds (13) 167 30 Investment losses on annuities payable (1,856) (2,106) 31 Payments on annuities payable (13,358) (12,659) 32 Increase to annuities payable resulting from new gifts 4,786 8,907 33 Net cash provided by financing activities 153,336 152,322
34 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 146,824 60,010 35 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 742,409 682,399 36 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $889,233 $742,409
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
B-4 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Invested in plant: Invested in plant assets, including collections of works Significant accounting policies followed by the University of of art and historical treasures, are stated at cost or fair value at the date Southern California are set forth below: of gift, plus the estimated value of any associated legal retirement obli- gations, less accumulated depreciation, computed on a straight-line The University of Southern California is a not-for-profit, major basis over the estimated useful or component lives of the assets (equip- private research university. The consolidated financial statements ment and library books useful lives ranging from 4 to 10 years and have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting, in accordance buildings component lives ranging from 5 to 50 years). Equipment is with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of removed from the records at the time of disposal. The university fol- America and with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified lows the policy of recording contributions of long-lived assets directly Public Accountants’ Audit and Accounting Guide, “Not-for-Profit in invested in plant assets when the purpose or time restriction is met Entities,” which requires the university to classify its net assets into instead of recognizing the gift over the useful life of the asset. three categories according to donor-imposed restrictions or provisions of law: unrestricted, temporarily restricted, or permanently restricted. Long-term investment: Long-term investments include gifts and Board All material transactions between the university and its subsidiaries of Trustee designations to funds functioning as endowment, realized have been eliminated. and unrealized gains and reinvested income (income earned in excess of the spending rule) on all endowment funds. The university is generally exempt from federal income taxes under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 501 (c) (3). The Student loan: Student loan net assets include lending activity to university is also generally exempt from payment of California state students utilizing university resources designated for that purpose. income, gift, estate and inheritance taxes. Temporarily restricted net assets: Unrestricted net assets: Gifts for which donor imposed restrictions have not been met (pri- Education and general: Education and general include the revenues marily future capital projects), charitable remainder unitrusts, pooled and expenses associated with the principal educational mission of income funds, gift annuities, net appreciation on true endowment and the university. pledges receivable for which the ultimate purpose of the proceeds is not permanently restricted are included in temporarily restricted net assets. Health care services: Health care services are reflective of the revenues and expenses associated with USC University Hospital, USC Norris Permanently restricted net assets: Cancer Hospital, the Health Care Consultation Center, the Profes- Gifts, charitable remainder unitrusts, pooled income funds, gift sional Services Agreement with Los Angeles County and USC Care annuities and pledges receivable which require by donor restriction Medical Group, Inc., a primary care and multi-specialty physician the investment of the corpus in perpetuity, net appreciation on true practice corporation. endowment and only the income be made available for program Sponsored research and departmental activities: Sponsored research operations in accordance with donor restrictions and gifts which agreements recognize revenue as it is earned through expenditure in have been donor stipulated to provide loans to students are included accordance with the agreement. Any funding received in advance in permanently restricted net assets. of expenditure is recorded as refundable advances. Departmental net Other accounting policies: assets include gifts to the university and its various schools and departments. The university has determined that any donor-imposed Cash equivalents consist of resources invested in money market funds. restrictions of gifts for current or developing programs and activities Investments are stated at fair value. Net appreciation (depreciation) are generally met within the operating cycle of the university and, in the fair value of investments, which consists of the realized gains or therefore, the university’s policy is to record these net assets as unre- losses and the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on those invest- stricted. Internally designated net assets are those which have been ments, is shown in the Consolidated Statement of Activities. Realized appropriated by the Board of Trustees or designated by management. gains and losses upon the sale of investments are calculated using the Unexpended plant and debt service funds: Unexpended plant and debt specific identification method and trade date. service net assets include gifts and income earned on unexpended Alternative investment holdings and certain other limited partnership balances for capital projects which are currently under construc- interests are invested in both publicly traded and privately owned tion and transfers from the operating budget to fund the debt service securities. The fair values of private investments are based on estimates requirements for outstanding bonds, notes and mortgages payable. The and assumptions of the general partners or partnership valuation com- university follows the policy of lifting the restrictions on contributions mittees in the absence of readily determinable market values. Such of cash or other assets received for the acquisition of long-lived assets valuations generally reflect discounts for illiquidity and consider vari- when the restrictions are fulfilled or the assets are placed in service. ables such as financial performance of investments, recent sales prices of investments and other pertinent information. B-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 (continued) Gifts from donors, including contributions receivable (unconditional Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or market. promises to give), are recorded as revenues in the year received. Gifts are valued using quoted market prices, market prices for similar assets, The university receives federal reimbursement for a portion of the independent appraisals, or by university management. Contributions costs of its facilities and equipment used in organized sponsored receivable are reported at their discounted value using credit-adjusted research. The Office of Management and Budget, Circular A-21, borrowing rates and an allowance for amounts estimated to be uncol- establishes principles for determining such reimbursable costs, requires lectible is provided. Donor-restricted gifts, which are received and conformity of the lives and methods used for federal cost reimburse- either spent, or deemed spent, within the same year, are reported as ment accounting and financial reporting purposes. The university’s unrestricted revenue. Gifts of long-lived assets with no donor-imposed policies and procedures are in conformity with these principles. time restrictions are reported as unrestricted revenue in the year Student tuition and fees are recorded as revenues during the year the received. Gifts restricted to the acquisition or construction of long- related academic services are rendered. Student tuition and fees received lived assets or subject to other time or purpose restrictions are reported in advance of services to be rendered are recorded as deferred revenue. as temporarily restricted revenue. The temporarily restricted net assets resulting from these gifts are released to unrestricted net assets when The university’s split interest agreements with donors consist primarily the donor-imposed restrictions are fulfilled or the assets are placed in of gift annuities, unitrusts, pooled income funds and life estates. For service. Gifts received for endowment investment are held in perpetu- irrevocable agreements, assets contributed are included in the uni- ity and recorded as permanently restricted revenue. versity’s investments and stated at fair value. Contribution revenue is recognized at the date each trust is established after recording liabilities Health care services revenues included the net patient service revenues for the actuarially-determined present value of the estimated future associated with the USC University Hospital, USC Norris Cancer payments to be made to the beneficiaries. The actuarial liability is Hospital and USC Care Medical Group, Inc.. Net patient service discounted at an appropriate risk-adjusted rate at the inception of each revenue is reported as estimated net realizable amounts from patients, agreement and the applicable actuarial mortality tables. Discount rates third party payors, government programs and other in the period in on split-interest agreements range from 3.3% to 9.5%. The liabilities which services are provided. The majority of the health care services are adjusted during the terms of the trusts for changes in the fair value are rendered to patients with commercial or managed care insurance, of the assets, accretion of discounts, and other changes in the estimates or under the federal Medicare and California State Medi-Cal pro- of future benefits. The Retired Pensioners 2000 Mortality Table was grams. Reimbursement from these various payors is based on a com- used for annuities. California Statutory Reserve for annuities issued bination of prospectively determined rates, discounts from charges and on or before December 31, 2004 used the 1983 Individual Annuity historical costs. Amounts received under the Medicare program are Mortality Table and the Annuity 2000 Mortality Table was used for subject to retroactive settlements based on review and final determina- annuities issued on or after January 1, 2005. tion by program intermediaries or their agents. Provisions for con- tractual adjustments and retroactive settlements related to those payors The university has recorded conditional asset retirement obligations are accrued on an estimated basis in the period the related services associated with the legally required removal and disposal of certain are rendered and adjusted in future periods as additional information hazardous materials, primarily asbestos, present in our facilities. When becomes known or as final settlements are determined. Health care an asset retirement obligation is identified, the university records the services revenues also include the revenues associated with the profes- fair value of the obligation as a liability. The fair value of the obliga- sional services agreement with the County of Los Angeles. tion is also capitalized as property, plant and equipment and then amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the associated Allowances for doubtful accounts are based upon management’s assess- asset. The fair value of the conditional asset retirement obligations was ment of historical and expected net collections considering historical estimated using a probability weighted, discounted cash flow model. business and economic conditions. Periodically throughout the year The present value of future estimated cash flows was calculated using management assesses the adequacy of the allowances for doubtful the credit adjusted, interest rate applicable to the university in order accounts based upon historical write-off experience. The results of this to determine the fair value of the conditional asset retirement obliga- review are then used to make any modifications to the allowance for tions. For the year ended June 30, 2011, the university recognized doubtful accounts. accretion expense related to the conditional asset retirement obliga- tion of approximately $4,876,000. For the year ended June 30, 2011, the university settled asset retirement obligations of approximately $1,017,000. As of June 30, 2011, included in the Consolidated Bal- ance Sheet is an asset retirement obligation of $97,691,000.
B-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 (continued) The university has adopted the authoritative guidance contained The preparation of financial statements in conformity with account- in FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, ing principles generally accepted in the United States of America for estimating the fair value of investments in investment funds that requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect have calculated Net Asset Value (“NAV”) per share in accordance the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of con- WITH &!3" !3# &INANCIAL