DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2015 to 12/31/2015 Lassen National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2015 to 12/31/2015 Lassen National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2015 to 12/31/2015 Lassen National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. Lassen National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Lassen NF ML3 Roads - Recreation management Developing Proposal Expected:04/2016 04/2016 Heather Blevins Evaluation Est. Scoping Start 10/2015 530-252-6622 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Forest-wide evaluation of maintance level changes and mixed use on ML3 roads Location: UNIT - Lassen National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Butte, Lassen, Plumas, Shasta, Tehama. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Various ML3 roads throughout Lassen NF. 10/01/2015 04:24 am MT Page 1 of 8 Lassen National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Lassen National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Lassen National Forest Over- - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:12/2016 12/2016 Chris Obrien Snow Vehicle(OSV) Use - Road management NOI in Federal Register 530-252-6698 Designation 01/20/2015 [email protected] EIS Est. DEIS NOA in Federal *UPDATED* Register 11/2015 Description: The Forest Service is evaluating its existing management of OSV use on the Lassen National Forest (LNF). The goal of this proposed project is to designate LNF system roads, trails, and areas where OSV use will be allowed, restricted or prohibited. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=45832 Location: UNIT - Lassen National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Lassen. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Forest wide existing miles of groomed OSV trails and open cross country areas of the LNF which receive adequate snowfall for OSV use to occur. Lassen National Forest Almanor Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Chips Creek Bridge - Recreation management On Hold N/A N/A Megan Mullowney CE 530-258-2141 [email protected] *UPDATED* s Description: The project is intended to re-establish a safe, sustainable trail crossing over Chips Creek along the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail for hikers and stock users. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46543 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Plumas. LEGAL - sec. 7, T. 25 N., R. 6 E., MDM. In the Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest, where the PCT crosses Chips Creek southeast of the Poison Springs trailhead. Feather River Allotment - Grazing management Completed Actual: 08/18/2015 09/2015 Bernice McProud Livestock Grazing Management 530 258-5129 Project - Name Change [email protected] EA Description: Grazing Management. *UPDATED* Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=38566 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Plumas. LEGAL - sec. 1-4, 9-15, 22-24 T29N R5E; sec. 4-9, 16-22, 27-30 T29N R6E, MDM. Northwest of Chester, Plumas County, California and south of Lassen Volcanic National Park. 10/01/2015 04:24 am MT Page 2 of 8 Lassen National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Lassen National Forest Almanor Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Finley Lake Turtle Structures - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 09/30/2015 10/2015 Christopher Mayes CE 530-258-5176 [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The ALRD proposes to construct and place turtle basking structures in Finley Lake to provide additional basking habitat for Western pond turtles Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46542 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Tehama. LEGAL - sec. 22, T. 28 N., R. 1 E. Hogback Ridge east of the Tehama State Wildlife Area. Grizzly Restoration Project - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:06/2016 07/2016 Blair Halbrooks EA - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Scoping Start 05/05/2015 530-258-5160 [email protected] *UPDATED* - Forest products Est. Comment Period Public - Fuels management Notice 11/2015 - Watershed management - Road management - Research and Development Description: Grizzly proposes to move Forest road 26N11 away from Scotts John Crk; increase forest resilience, decrease fuels, maintain/improve wildlife habitat through thinning and prescribed fire; and implement actions to support three research proposals Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=43332 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Butte, Plumas. LEGAL - Not Applicable. The project area consists of four separate areas near Scotts John Creek, Grizzly Creek, Water Creek, and Yellow Creek, and ranges in elevation from 4,150 feet to 7,200 feet. Mudstove Project - Forest products Developing Proposal Expected:12/2015 01/2016 Tammy Alexander CE - Fuels management Est. Scoping Start 10/2015 530-258-2141 [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Description: The Mudstove project proposes to salvage harvest windthrown trees and trees structurally damaged by the 2/6/2015 extreme wind event. Proposed project is approximately 250 acres. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=47761 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Plumas. LEGAL - sec 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 T28N, R6E; sec 29, 31, 32 T30N, R7E; sec 5, 6, 8, 9 T29N, R7E, MDM. pockets of windthrow in portions of Stover Mountain and Mud Creek Rim. 10/01/2015 04:24 am MT Page 3 of 8 Lassen National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Lassen National Forest Almanor Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Storrie Aquatic Organism - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:12/2015 08/2016 Christopher Mayes Passage (AOP) Project Scoping Start 09/30/2015 530-258-5176 CE [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Remove three road-stream crossing structures that are barriers to aquatic organism passage. Replace with new structures that allow aquatic organisms to pass above and below the road crossings and that are capable of passing a 100-year storm flow. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=46497 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Plumas. LEGAL - Not Applicable. 3 separate project sites: NFS road 26N08 crossing Water Creek, NFS road 26N08 crossing Miller Ravine, and NFS road 26N08 crossing Rock Creek. All sites are within the Yellow Creek 5th field watershed. TCRCD Hazardous Fuels - Fuels management Completed Actual: 07/09/2015 07/2015 Jennifer Hensel Reduction 530-258-5177 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: This project would authorize the transfer of Wyden Amendment funds to the Tehama County Resource Conservation District to implement fuels reduction activities along roads in private timber lands to complement fuels reduction activities in NFS lands. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=44911 Location: UNIT - Almanor Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Tehama. LEGAL - T29N R03E sec. 2,5,8,17,20,21,27-29; T30N R03E sec. 20,21,28,29,32-35. Roadside fuels between the Shasta County line and State Route 36E; 6 miles east of Manton and 6 miles west of Mineral, crossing Battle Creek's north and south forks. Lassen National Forest Eagle Lake Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Blacks Windthrow Salvage - Forest products In Progress: Expected:10/2015 10/2015 Terre PearsonRamirez Project - Fuels management Scoping Start 07/27/2015 530-257-4188 CE [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Description: Mechanically salvage the windthrown trees within the Blacks Experimental Forest for the purpose of capturing economic value, restoring access, and improving safety.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inyo National Forest Visitor Guide
    >>> >>> Inyo National Forest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Visitor Guide >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> $1.00 Suggested Donation FRED RICHTER Inspiring Destinations © Inyo National Forest Facts “Inyo” is a Paiute xtending 165 miles Bound ary Peak, South Si er ra, lakes and 1,100 miles of streams Indian word meaning along the California/ White Mountain, and Owens River that provide habitat for golden, ENevada border between Headwaters wildernesses. Devils brook, brown and rainbow trout. “Dwelling Place of Los Angeles and Reno, the Inyo Postpile Nation al Mon ument, Mam moth Mountain Ski Area National Forest, established May ad min is tered by the National Park becomes a sum mer destination for the Great Spirit.” 25, 1907, in cludes over two million Ser vice, is also located within the mountain bike en thu si asts as they acres of pris tine lakes, fragile Inyo Na tion al For est in the Reds ride the chal leng ing Ka mi ka ze Contents Trail from the top of the 11,053-foot mead ows, wind ing streams, rugged Mead ow area west of Mam moth Wildlife 2 Sierra Ne va da peaks and arid Great Lakes. In addition, the Inyo is home high Mam moth Moun tain or one of Basin moun tains. El e va tions range to the tallest peak in the low er 48 the many other trails that transect Wildflowers 3 from 3,900 to 14,494 feet, pro vid­ states, Mt. Whitney (14,494 feet) the front coun try of the forest. Wilderness 4-5 ing diverse habitats that sup port and is adjacent to the lowest point Sixty-five trailheads provide Regional Map - North 6 vegetation patterns ranging from in North America at Badwater in ac cess to over 1,200 miles of trail Mono Lake 7 semiarid deserts to high al pine Death Val ley Nation al Park (282 in the 1.2 million acres of wil der- meadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Abella, S. R. 2010. Disturbance and plant succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:1248—1284. Abella, S. R., D. J. Craig, L. P. Chiquoine, K. A. Prengaman, S. M. Schmid, and T. M. Embrey. 2011. Relationships of native desert plants with red brome (Bromus rubens): Toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:115—124. Abella, S. R., N. A. Fisichelli, S. M. Schmid, T. M. Embrey, D. L. Hughson, and J. Cipra. 2015. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nature Conservation 10:71—94. Available: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407 Abella, S. R., A. A. Suazo, C. M. Norman, and A. C. Newton. 2013. Treatment alternatives and timing affect seeds of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an invasive forb in American Southwest arid lands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:559—567. Available: https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00022.1 Abrahamson, I. 2014. Arctostaphylos manzanita. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System (Online). plants/shrub/arcman/all.html Ackerman, T. L. 1979. Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 24:399—408. Adams, A. W. 1975. A brief history of juniper and shrub populations in southern Oregon. Report No. 6. Oregon State Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, OR. Adams, L. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three species of Ceanothus.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Set Listing (May 1997)
    USDA Forest Service Air Resource Monitoring System Existing Data Set Listing (May 1997) Air Resource Monitoring System (ARMS) Data Set Listing May 1997 Contact Steve Boutcher USDA Forest Service National Air Program Information Manager Portland, OR (503) 808-2960 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 DATA SET DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 National & Multi-Regional Data Sets EPA’S EASTERN LAKES SURVEY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 EPA’S NATIONAL STREAM SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 EPA WESTERN LAKES SURVEY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) LICHEN MONITORING-------------------------------------------------14 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) OZONE BIOINDICATOR PLANTS ----------------------------------15 IMPROVE AEROSOL MONITORING--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 IMPROVE NEPHELOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 IMPROVE TRANSMISSOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION PROGRAM/ NATIONAL TRENDS NETWORK----------------19 NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • References References Abrams, L
    References References Abrams, L. 1944. Illustrated flora of the Pacific States, Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 635 p. Alexander, R. 1980. Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir. In: Eyre, F. H., ed. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters; 86-87. Atzet, T.; Wheeler, D. L. 1984. Preliminary plant associations of the Siskiyou Mountains province. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Region, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture; 315 p. Ball, J. T. 1976. Ecological survey, Last Chance Meadow candidate research natural area, Mount Whitney Ranger District, Inyo National Forest. Unpublished report on file, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, Calif. Barbour, M. G.; Major, J., eds. 1977. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience; 1002 p. Beauchamp, R. M. 1986. A flora of San Diego County, California. National City, CA: Sweetwater River Press; 241 p. Becking, R. W. 1989. Segregation of Hastingsia serpentinicola sp. nov. from Hastingsia alba (Liliaceae: Asphodeleae). Madrono 36: 208-216. Beguin, C. N.; Major, J. 1975. Contribution to the phytosociology and ecology of bogs of the Sierra Nevada (California). Phytocoenologia 2(3/4): 349-367 (an English translation of the original French text is given as an appendix to Burke 1987). Berg, K. S. 1990. Establishment record for Station Creek Research Natural Area within Eldorado National Forest in El Dorado County, California. Unpublished report on file, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, Calif. Berg, K. S. 1991a. Establishment record for Grass Lake Research Natural Area within Eldorado National Forest, managed in Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, in El Dorado County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Order No. 21-07 Emergency Forest Closures
    Regional Order No. 21-07 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Forest Closure Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a) and (b), and to provide for public safety and protect natural resources, the following acts are prohibited on National Forest System lands within the Pacific Southwest Region. This Order supersedes Regional Order No. 21-04 and is effective from August 31, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. through September 17, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. 1. Going into or being upon National Forest System lands within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p. Stanislaus National Forest q. Inyo National Forest 36 C.F.R. § 261.52(e). 2. Being on a National Forest System road within the National Forests listed below. a. Tahoe National Forest b. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit c. Plumas National Forest d. Lassen National Forest e. Mendocino National Forest f. Klamath National Forest g. Six Rivers National Forest h. Shasta-Trinity National Forest i. Modoc National Forest j. Cleveland National Forest k. San Bernardino National Forest l. Angeles National Forest m. Los Padres National Forest n. Sequoia National Forest o. Sierra National Forest p.
    [Show full text]
  • C a L I F O R N
    BACKPACKER CALIFORNIA <<< WILD WEEKENDS IN YOUR BACKYARD & N E V A D A Lower Rock Creek Morris Meadow Enjoy a variety of seasons in Inyo National Forest Get an alpine fix, maybe some fish, on this Trinity Alps trek THE HIKE This downhill shuttle hike may be THE HIKE If you can’t wait for the warmup to hard on the knees, but the views of seasonal thaw high routes in the Sierras and southern change are easy on the eyes. In spring, you Cascades, this 18-mile out-and-back into the can watch the last remnants of snow give heart of the Trinity Alps Wilderness is just the way to blooming wildflowers; in fall, you can ticket. Follow the Stuart Fork Trail as it parallels see autumn colors rewind to vibrant summer the tumbling waters of Stuart Fork, winding greens as you descend 1,900 feet over 9.3 through a rocky channel beneath a dense miles. Start on the Lower Rock Creek Trail as canopy of mixed hardwoods. The river supports it drops gently from the upper trailhead, then cross the creek a healthy population of rainbow trout, so pack tackle. You’ll climb and follow its banks southeast for 2.2 miles. When you reach a gentle slope up a canyon amid black oaks, ponderosa pines, the road, hook right; follow the road briefly, then cross the creek and incense cedars, crossing several streams. After nearly 9 again and pick up the trail on its west bank. Head another 2.2 miles of forest, expansive Morris Meadow opens up at 4,400 miles south through the woods until you cross the road and feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Suprised ?
    Transportation Observations, Considerations, and Recommendations relative to the Eastern Sierra Expanded Transit System and the Reds Meadow Shuttle Provided by the Interagency Transportation Assistance Group (TAG) / Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL) Program Mammoth Lakes / Bishop, CA August 21 – 23, 2007 A field investigation of the current transportation issues and opportunities relative to the Eastern Sierra Expanded Transit System and the Reds Meadow Shuttle by the inter- agency Transportation Assistance Group (TAG) was conducted August 21-23, 2007, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS) in cooperation with the Devils Postpile National Monument (National Park Service (NPS)) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This TAG report was prepared subsequent to the site visit and interaction with numerous federal, state, local and private sector stakeholders. This report documents the conditions observed, transportation issues and considerations, and recommendations arising from the TAG analysis. The site visit and the preparation of this report were facilitated and funded by the Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL) program, administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in coordination with the Department of the Interior (DOI). Background and Conditions The Eastern Sierra Expanded Transit System has evolved from concept to reality through the creation of the Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) on July 1, 2007. The ESTA service area encompasses a large area stretching from Reno, NV, on the north to Ridgecrest, CA, on the south – with connections from the region to major metropolitan areas (Las Vegas, NV, Los Angeles, CA, and San Francisco, CA). Inyo and Mono counties comprise the majority of the area both in terms of geography and recreational and tourism opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Inyo National Forest on Cross-Country a Variety of Terrain, from Wide-Open Meadows to Forested Paved Mammoth Scenic Loop Road
    WINTER SAFETY Know Before You Go! • Check local weather conditions. • Tell someone WHERE you are going, WHEN you are INYO NATIONAL www.esavalanche.org returning, and WHO you are going with. U.S. Forest Service Avalanche Center: • Know the risks and be prepared. For the most recent information on snow conditions and ava- HYPOTHERMIA is a lowering of the inner temperature of the body FOREST lanche activity, please visit the website or call: resulting in rapid and progressive mental and physical collapse. Caused by exposure to cold and aggravated by wetness, wind, and (760) 924-5510 exhaustion, untreated hypothermia can result in death. for the most recent information WEATHER conditions can change rapidly. • Obtain a weather report before your trip. • Avoid traveling during heavy storms and whiteout conditions AVALANCHES may occur at any time during the winter. • Routes and areas open to winter use are not controlled for avalanches. • Avoid mountainous terrain after heavy snowfalls or long periods of high wind. • Avoid crossing steep hillsides and entering narrow, steep- sided canyons. • If crossing potentially dangerous areas is unavoidable, cross one person at a time. CREEKS AND LAKES • Stay off frozen lakes. • Cross snow-covered creeks with care. SURVIVAL KIT • Warm clothes for layering (wool or synthetics are best) • Space blanket • Water, sunglasses, and sunscreen • Ensolite pad • Whistle for emergency signaling (3 blasts means “help”) • Waterproof matches or lighter • Map and compass To Report Unsafe or Illegal Activities, Please Call (760)-873-2405 Emergencies DIAL 911 The Mammoth Lakes Trail System website provides an online guide to winter and summer recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • SFL Et Al. Objection to the Inyo Revised Forest Plan (10/3/18) Fran Hunt Eastern Sierra Organizer Sierra Club
    October 3, 2018 Barnie Gyant Objection Reviewing Officer Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 Submitted via: [email protected] Re: Objections to the Inyo National Forest Plan Revision and Species of Conservation Concern Dear Mr. Gyant: Pursuant to 36 CFR Part 219 Subpart B, Sierra Forest Legacy, California Wilderness Coalition, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Inyo, California Native Plant Society, Mono Lake Committee, Western Watersheds Project, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, Lassen Forest Preservation Group, and Forest Issues Group are objecting to portions of the Draft Record of Decision, Final Forest Plan, and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Inyo National Forest. The responsible official for the Inyo plan revision is Tammy Randall-Parker, Forest Supervisor, Inyo National Forest. We are also objecting to the list of Species of Conservation Concern adopted by Regional Forester Randy Moore. Collectively, the objecting organizations have provided substantive formal comments throughout the forest planning process for the Inyo National Forest on the objection issues we raise below. We are deeply invested in securing a forest plan for the Inyo National Forest that protects important natural resources and provides for people. This objection covers a variety of issues related to resources affected by the revised forest plan and offers recommendations on how objection issues could be resolved. We appreciate the opportunity for review and possible resolution of issues contained in this objection prior to the approval of the final plan. We look forward to an opportunity to discuss our concerns with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement - Los Padres National Forest Tamarisk Removal Project
    Final Environmental Impact United States Department of Agriculture Statement Forest Service Los Padres National Forest September 2016 Tamarisk Removal Project Los Padres National Forest Kern, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, California In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877- 8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Recreation in the Sierra
    TIMOTHY P. DUANE Department of City and Regional Planning and Department of Landscape Architecture University of California 19 Berkeley, California Recreation in the Sierra ABSTRACT Recreation is a significant activity in the Sierra Nevada, which serves INTRODUCTION as a center for a wide range of recreational activities. The Sierra con- The Sierra Nevada region is a popular destination for tains some of the world’s outstanding natural features, and they at- recreationists. Year-round local residents and California resi- tract visitors from throughout the country and the world. Lake Tahoe, dents and nonresidents pursue a wide variety of recreational Yosemite Valley, Mono Lake, and the Sequoia Big Trees attract mil- activities. These pursuits occur throughout the entire region, lions of visitors each year. Recreational activities on public lands alone from the bottom of steep river canyons to the top of the high- account for between 50 and 60 million recreational visitor days (RVDs) est mountain peaks. The mountain range is the natural infra- per year, with nearly three-fifths to two-thirds of those RVDs occur- structure that supports wilderness backpackers, skiers, fishing ring on lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service. The Califor- enthusiasts, off-road vehicle users, naturalists, and many oth- nia Department of Parks and Recreation has the second greatest ers. All individuals who pursue outdoor activities within the number of RVDs, followed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the Sierra Nevada rely upon the natural world for an enjoyable National Park Service, and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. experience. The ecological conditions of the Sierra Nevada Additional recreational activities on private lands account for millions are therefore important factors influencing patterns of recre- more RVDs that are currently not accounted for by any agency in a ational activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2017 to 09/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2017 to 09/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Nevia Brown National Forests Land DEIS NOA in Federal Register 7075629121 Management Plans Revision 05/27/2016 [email protected] EIS Est.
    [Show full text]