Why Bother? S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Bother? S Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Why Bother? Why do vote-suppression efforts sometimes fail? Why does police repression of demonstrators sometimes turn localized protests into massive, national movements? How do politicians and activists manip- ulate people’s emotions to get them involved? The authors of Why Bother? offer a new theory of why people take part in collective action in politics and test it in the contexts of voting and protesting. They develop the idea that just as there are costs of participation in poli- tics, there are also costs of abstention – intrinsic and psychological but no less real for that. That abstention can be psychically costly helps explain real-world patterns that are anomalies for existing theories, such as that sometimes increases in costs of participation are followed by more participation, not less. The book draws on a wealth of survey data, interviews, and experimental results from a range of countries, including the United States, Britain, Brazil, Sweden, and Turkey. S. Erdem Aytaç is an assistant professor in the Department of Interna- tional Relations at Koç University in Istanbul, Turkey. He received his Ph.D. in political science from Yale University in 2014. Aytaç’s research interests lie in political behavior with a focus on democratic account- ability and political participation. His previous work has appeared in the Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Behavior, British Jour- nal of Political Science, Political Behavior, and the Journal of Conflict Resolution, among other journals. He is the recipient of the 2016 Young Scientist Award of Science Academy (Turkey) and the 2018 Sakıp Sabancı International Research Award. Susan C. Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Ser- vice Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and past chair of the Yale Political Science Department. She is the author of Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America (Cam- bridge) and co-author of Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge). © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics General Editors Kathleen Thelen Massachusetts Institute of Technology Erik Wibbels Duke University Associate Editors Catherine Boone London School of Economics Thad Dunning University of California, Berkeley Anna Grzymala-Busse Stanford University Torben Iversen Harvard University Stathis Kalyvas Yale University Margaret Levi Stanford University Helen Milner Princeton University Frances Rosenbluth Yale University Susan Stokes University of Chicago Tariq Thachil Vanderbilt University Series Founder Peter Lange Duke University Other Books in the Series Christopher Adolph, Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality Michael Albertus, Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform Santiago Anria, When Movements Become Parties: The Bolivian MAS in Comparative Perspective BenW.Ansell,From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education Ben W. Ansell, David J. Samuels, Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach Leonardo R. Arriola, Multi-Ethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns David Austen-Smith, Jeffry A. Frieden, Miriam A. Golden, Karl Ove Moene, and Adam Przeworski, eds., Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy Andy Baker, The Market and the Masses in Latin America: Policy Reform and Consumption in Liberalizing Economies Continued after the index © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests S. ERDEM AYTAÇ Koç University SUSAN C. STOKES University of Chicago © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information University Printing House, Cambridge CB28BS, United Kingdom One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia 314–321, 3rd Floor, Plot 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi – 110025, India 79 Anson Road, #06–04/06, Singapore 079906 Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781108475228 DOI: 10.1017/9781108690416 c S. Erdem Aytaç and Susan C. Stokes 2019 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2019 Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Inc. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Aytaç, S. Erdem, 1980– author. | Stokes, Susan Carol, author. Title: Why bother? : rethinking participation in elections and protests / S. Erdem Aytaç, Koç University, Susan C. Stokes, University of Chicago. Description: New York : Cambridge University Press, [2018] | Series: Cambridge studies in comparative politics | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identiers: LCCN 2018035529 | ISBN 9781108475228 Subjects: LCSH: Political participation. | Voter turnout. | Voting – Abstention. | Voting research. | Protest movements – Political aspects. Classication: LCC JF799 .A93 2018 | DDC 323/.042–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018035529 ISBN 978-1-108-47522-8 Hardback ISBN 978-1-108-46594-6 Paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLS for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Erdem: For my family. Susan: For Lewyn and Arlo, future participants. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Contents List of Figures page viii List of Tables ix Preface and Acknowledgments xi 1 Introduction: Rethinking Political Participation 1 2 Theories of Voter Participation: A Review and a New Approach 13 3 Testing the Costly Abstention Theory of Turnout 37 4 Theories of Protest Participation: A Review and a New Approach 68 5 Testing the Costly Abstention Theory of Protest Participation 83 6 The Emotional Origins of Collective Action 103 7 Conclusions: Criticisms, Extensions, and Democratic Theory 128 Bibliography 137 Index 150 vii © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Figures 3.1 Turnout in the US presidential and midterm congressional elections, 1960–2016 page 39 3.2 Respondents’ assessments of chances for a presidential tie in the United States 43 3.3 Distribution of responses to the outcome question in the Turnout experiment 49 3.4 The average likelihood of voting across treatment conditions in the Turnout experiment 50 3.5 Negative affect emotions across experimental groups in the Abstention experiment 55 3.6 Negative affect emotions across experimental groups in the (Important, Close) election group of the Abstention experiment 56 3.7 The average likelihood of voting across treatment conditions, unweighted and weighted data 66 3.8 Negative affect emotions across experimental groups in the Abstention experiment, weighted data 67 4.1 The impact of repression on the costs of abstention and participation 81 6.1 Bounce-back effect among the unemployed in the United States 105 6.2 Unemployment rate and proportion of economy-related words in presidential challengers’ nomination acceptance speeches in the United States, 1976–2016 107 6.3 Istanbul 2015 survey: images used in the Repression treatment 116 viii © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47522-8 — Why Bother? S. Erdem Aytaç , Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More Information Tables 2.1 Correlates of turnout in Britain and Sweden – BES and SNES 2010 page 15 3.1 Setup of the Turnout experiment 49 3.2 Treatment vignettes in the Abstention experiment 53 3.3 Experimental conditions and vignettes in the Duty experiment 58 3.4 Manipulation checks for the Duty experiment 59 3.5 Average treatment
Recommended publications
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America Susan C
    Cambridge University Press 0521801184 - Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America Susan C. Stokes Frontmatter More information Mandates and Democracy Sometimes politicians run for office promising one set of policies and then, if they win, they switch to very different ones. Latin American presidents in recent years have frequently run promising to avoid pro-market reforms and harsh economic adjustment, then win and transform immediately into enthu- siastic market reformers. Does it matter when politicians ignore the promises they made and the preferences of their constituents? If politicians want to be reelected or see their party reelected at the end of their term, why would they impose unpopular policies? Susan Stokes explores questions of mandates, promises, and democratic theory in light of the Latin American experience. She develops a model of policy switches and tests it with statistical and qual- itative data from Latin American elections over the last two decades. She con- cludes that politicians may change course because they believe that unpopular policies are best for constituents and hence also will best serve their own po- litical ambitions. Nevertheless, even though good representatives will some- times switch policies, abrupt changes of course tend to erode the quality of democracy. Susan C. Stokes is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy. Professor Stokes is co- editor of Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (1999) and editor of Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies (2001). She is the author of Cul- tures in Conflict: Social Movements and the State in Peru (1995) and of many arti- cles on democratic theory, political economy, and Latin American politics.
    [Show full text]
  • JACK KNIGHT Frederic Cleaveland Professor of Law and Political Science Duke
    JACK KNIGHT Frederic Cleaveland Professor of Law and Political Science Duke University Department of Political Science Box 90204 Durham, North Carolina 27708 Phone: 919-660-4352/919-613-8551 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION The University of Chicago Ph.D. 1989 The University of Chicago M.A. 1980 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill J.D. 1977 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill B.A. 1974 (Double Major in English Literature and Religious Studies) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Teaching Frederic Cleaveland Professor of Law and Political Science, Duke University, 2011- Professor of Law and Political Science, Duke University, 2008- Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government in Arts and Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 2000-2008 Professor, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 1999-2008 Professor of Law (courtesy), Washington University in St. Louis, 1999-2008 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 1995- 1999 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 1988- 1995 Instructor, The University of Chicago, 1984-1986, 1987-1988 Instructor, The University of Michigan, 1986-1987, 1989-1994 Teaching Assistant, The University of Chicago, 1980-1982 Other Academic Director, Center for Judicial Studies, Duke University, School of Law 2011- Department Chair, Department of Political Science, Duke University 2013- Visiting Faculty, International Center for Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School 2006- Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation 2002-2003 Visiting Scholar, Max-Plank Institute, Bonn, Germany 2000, 2005 Department Chair, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 1999- 2002, 2003-2004 Associate Chair, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Seminar in Comparative Politics
    PL SC 550: Core Seminar in Comparative Politics Course Information Class Time: Monday 1.00-4.00 Place: 236 Pond Lab Course Website: Canvas Contact Information for Professor Name: Matt Golder Homepage: http://mattgolder.com/ E-mail: [email protected] (preferred method of contact) Tel: 814-867-4323 Office: 306 Pond Lab Office Hours: Wednesday 10-11. Course Description This course is the core seminar for the field of comparative politics in the political science Ph.D. program. It provides an introduction to the dominant questions, theories, and empirical research in comparative politics. While international politics concerns itself with the study of political phenomena that occur predominantly between countries, comparative politics concerns itself with the study of political phenomena that occur pre- dominantly within countries. As such, comparative politics is a vast field of research. The substantive topics covered in this course include, among other things, democracy and development, democratic performance, authoritarian politics, political institutions, culture and identity issues, civil war, elections and political par- ties, representation and accountability, and political economy. The course has two primary goals: (i) to prepare students for a research career in comparative politics by providing a general survey of the field, and (ii) to help prepare doctoral candidates for the comprehensive examination in comparative politics. Course Requirements 1. Participation (10%). Attendance is mandatory. All students are required to have completed the read- ings for each week before class begins, and everyone should be prepared to discuss the readings during class. Intelligent participation in departmental talks and at conferences will be highly valued throughout your professional career and you should practice this ability now.
    [Show full text]
  • MARGARET LEVI Jere L. Bacharach Professor of International Studies
    MARGARET LEVI Jere L. Bacharach Professor of International Senior Fellow Studies Watson Institute for International Studies Department of Political Science 111 Thayer Street Gowen 101-353530 Brown University University of Washington Box 1970 Seattle, WA 98195 Providence, RI 02912 USA [email protected] http://faculty.washington.edu/mlevi/ http://watson.brown.edu/people/fellows/levi Education Ph.D. Harvard University 1974 (Government) A.B. Bryn Mawr College 1968 (Political Science, cum laude) Work History Professor of Political Science, University of Washington, 1987- Senior Fellow, Watson Institute of International Studies, Brown University, 2013-14 Chair in U.S. Politics, United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney, 2009-13 Director, CHAOS (Comparative and Historical Analysis of Organizations and States) Center, UW, 2002 Harry Bridges Chair and Director, University of Washington Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies, 1996-2000 Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Washington, 1981-87 Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Affairs, University of Washington, 1974-81 Research Associate, Organizational Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973-74 Honors and Awards President (2004-5), President–Elect (2003-4), and Vice-President (2002-3), American Political Science Association Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholar, 2006-7 John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship, 2002-2003 American Academy of Arts and Sciences, elected 2001 S. Sterling Munro Public Service Teaching Award, University of Washington, 2001 Honorable Mention, 1998 Allan Sharlin Memorial Prize, Social Science History Association, for Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism Woodrow Wilson in Political Science, 1968 National Merit Scholarship Certificate of Merit, 1963 100 Top Collectors (with Robert Kaplan), Arts & Antique Magazine, 2004, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Mccall Rosenbluth Department of Political Science 49
    Frances McCall Rosenbluth Department of Political Science 49 Deepwood Drive Yale University Hamden, CT 06517 New Haven, CT 06520 203 687 9585 203 432 4449 [email protected] EDUCATION Columbia University, Ph.D. in Political Science, 1988. School of International and Public Affairs, M.A., May 1983. East Asian Institute Certificate, December 1982. University of Tokyo, 1985-1986. Inter-University Center, Tokyo, 1981-1982. University of Virginia, B.A., Highest Distinction, 1980. Major in Government and Foreign Affairs. ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2007- Damon Wells Professor of International Politics, Yale University. 1994- Professor, Department of Political Science, Yale University. 1992- Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, UCLA. 1994 1989- Assistant Professor, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific 1992 Studies, UCSD. 1988- Assistant Professor, Department of Government and Foreign Affairs, 1989 University of Virginia AWARDS National Merit Scholar (1976), National Research Scholarship for language study (1981- 1982), Columbia University Presidential Fellowship, 1982-1984, Fulbright Scholarship (1985-1987), Social Science Research Council Dissertation Write-up Grant (1987-1988), National Science Foundation, (1991-1992), Council on Foreign Relations Fellowship (1998-1999), Abe Foundation Fellowship (2001-2002), American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2008), John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship (2010-2011), Victoria Schuck Prize for Best Book in Gender and Politics (with Torben Iversen, 2012), Heinz 1 Eulau Prize for Best Article in the American Political Science Review (with Carles Boix, 2015), Lex Hixon ’63 Prize for Teaching Excellence in the Social Sciences, Yale College (2017), William Clyde DeVane Medal for Teaching Excellence in Yale College (2018). PUBLICATIONS Books: (with Ian Shapiro). Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Brendan Nyhan HB 6108 [email protected] Hanover, NH 03755 dartmouth.edu/∼nyhan Academic appointments Professor of Government 2016{2018, 2019{ Dartmouth College Professor of Public Policy 2018{2019 Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan Faculty Associate 2018{2019 Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research Professor (by courtesy) 2019 School of Information, University of Michigan Assistant Professor of Government 2011{2016 Dartmouth College Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy Research 2009{2011 University of Michigan Education Ph.D., Political Science 2009 Duke University M.A., Political Science 2005 Duke University B.A. with High Honors, Political Science 2000 Swarthmore College Education Ph.D., Political Science 2009 Duke University M.A., Political Science 2005 Duke University B.A. with High Honors, Political Science 2000 Swarthmore College Peer-reviewed publications Brendan Nyhan: CV (1) \Searching for a Bright Line: The First Year of the Trump Presidency." Forthcoming, Perspectives on Politics. (with John M. Carey, Gretchen Helmke, Mitchell Sanders, and Susan C. Stokes) \Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Banners in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media." Forthcoming, Political Behavior. (with the students in my 2017 Experiments in Politics seminar at Dartmouth) \Taking Corrections Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Information on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability." Forthcoming, Political Behavior. (with Ethan Porter, Jason Reifler, and Thomas J. Wood) \The Role of Information Deficits and Identity Threat in the Prevalence of Misperceptions." 2019. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 29(2): 222{244. (with Jason Reifler) -Finalist, 2015 Prize in Public Interest Communications Research, University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications \Conspiracy and Misperception Belief in the Middle East and North Africa." 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Susan C. Stokes Political Science Department the University Of
    Susan C. Stokes Political Science Department The University of Chicago 5828 South University Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 [email protected] +1 203-500-8678 Positions held 2018- Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of current Political Science, University of Chicago 2018- Director, Chicago Center on Democracy, University of Chicago current 2005-2018 John S. Saden Professor of Political Science, Yale University Director, Yale Program on Democracy 2015- 2018 Chair, Yale Council on Latin American and Iberian Studies 2009-2014 Chair, Political Science Department, Yale University 2000-2005 Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago 1996-2000 Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago 1991-1996 Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago 1988-1991 Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Washington Education 1988 Ph.D. in Political Science, Stanford University 1985 M.A. in Anthropology, Stanford University 1981 A.B., Harvard-Radcliffe, magna cum laude with Highest Honors in Anthropology Grants and fellowships 2017-2019 Hewlett Foundation, Yale Program on Democracy and Bright Line Watch 2017-2019 Democracy Fund, Yale Program on Democracy and Bright Line Watch 1 2014-2015 Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation 2010-2014 Associate Member, Nuffield College, Oxford University 2008 Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 2003-2004 John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship 2003-2005 National Science Foundation research grant SES-0241958 2002-2003 Research grant, Trust and Consolidation of Democracy, Russell Sage 1999-2000 American Philosophical Society Sabbatical Fellowship 1997-1999 National Science Foundation research grant, Mandates and Democracy 1990-1994 SSRC-MacArthur Fellowship in International Peace and Security 1985-1986 Fulbright-Hays Department of Education Dissertation Research Grant 1982-1985 National Science Foundation Graduate Studies Fellowship 1981-1982 Fulbright-IIE research grant Prizes 2016 George H.
    [Show full text]
  • Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: the Puzzle of Distributive Politics Susan C
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04220-9 - Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics Susan C. Stokes, Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno and Valeria Brusco Frontmatter More information Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism addresses major questions in distributive politics. Why is it acceptable for parties to try to win elections by promising to make certain groups of people better off, but unacceptable – and illegal – to pay people for their votes? Why do parties often lavish benefits on loyal voters, whose support they can count on any- way, rather than on responsive swing voters? Why are vote buying and machine politics common in today’s developing democracies but a thing of the past in most of today’s advanced democracies? This book develops a theory of broker-mediated distribution to answer these questions, testing the theory with research from four developing democ- racies, and reviews a rich secondary literature on countries in all world regions. The authors deploy normative theory to evaluate whether clientelism, pork-barrel politics, and other nonprogrammatic distributive strategies can be justified on the grounds that they promote efficiency, redistribution, or voter participation. Susan C. Stokes is John S. Saden Professor of Political Science at Yale University and Director of the Yale Program on Democracy. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a past vice president of the American Political Science Association (APSA), and a past president of APSA’s Comparative Politics Section. Her books and articles explore democratization and how democracy works in developing countries. Her research has been supported by grants and fellowships from the National Science Foundation, the Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the Russell Sage Foundation, the American Philosophical Society, the MacArthur Foundation, and Fulbright programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Perverse Accountability: a Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina SUSAN C
    American Political Science Review Vol. 99, No. 3 August 2005 Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina SUSAN C. STOKES Yale University olitical machines (or clientelist parties) mobilize electoral support by trading particularistic benefits to voters in exchange for their votes. But if the secret ballot hides voters’ actions from the machine, P voters are able to renege, accepting benefits and then voting as they choose. To explain how machine politics works, I observe that machines use their deep insertion into voters’ social networks to try to circumvent the secret ballot and infer individuals’ votes. When parties influence how people vote by threatening to punish them for voting for another party, I call this perverse accountability.I analyze the strategic interaction between machines and voters as an iterated prisoners’ dilemma game with one-sided uncertainty. The game generates hypotheses about the impact of the machine’s capacity to monitor voters, and of voters’ incomes and ideological stances, on the effectiveness of machine politics. I test these hypotheses with data from Argentina. hirty-five years ago, James Scott (1969) observed machines also have the secret ballot. Political machines that political life of contemporary new nations did not disappear in the United States after the intro- bore a strong resemblance to the machine poli- duction of the Australian ballot in most U.S. states at T 1 tics of the United States in earlier eras. The patronage, the end of the nineteenth century. And clientelism particularism, and graft endemic to the Philippines or flourishes in countries from Mexico (Fox 1994) to Italy Malaysia in the postwar decades recalled, for Scott, (Chubb 1982) to Bulgaria (Kitschelt et al.
    [Show full text]