DOCSLIB.ORG

Treason on Trial: the United States V. Jefferson Davis'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treason on Trial: the United States V. Jefferson Davis' H-Nationalism Walser on Icenhauer-Ramirez, 'Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis' Review published on Monday, March 29, 2021 Robert Icenhauer-Ramirez. Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2019. 376 pp. $55.00 (cloth),ISBN 978-0-8071-7080-9. Reviewed by Heather C. Walser (The Pennsylvania State University) Published on H-Nationalism (March, 2021) Commissioned by Evan C. Rothera (University of Arkansas - Fort Smith) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=56425 In Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis, Robert Icenhauer-Ramirez explores why the United States failed to prosecute Jefferson Davis for treason in the years following the US Civil War. When federal troops arrested the former Confederate president outside of Irwinville, Georgia, in the early morning hours of May 10, 1865, few questioned whether Davis would face treason charges. Considering Davis’s role as the leader of the Confederacy, accusations about his involvement in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, and President Andrew Johnson’s well-known stance regarding the need to make treason “odious,” prosecution of Davis seemed inevitable. But as Icenhauer-Ramirez skillfully demonstrates, any efforts to successfully try Davis for treason hinged on the capabilities and willingness of multiple individuals involved in the prosecution. According toTreason on Trial, the inability of the prosecution to determine when and where Davis should be tried, the reluctance of Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase to actively participate in the case in his role as judge, and the skillful use of the countless delays by Davis’s attorneys and wife crippled the prosecution and resulted in Davis’s release from federal custody in December 1868 as a free, and fully pardoned, man. Davis’s trial, or more appropriately lack thereof, has piqued the interest of multiple historians in recent years, but Icenhauer-Ramirez approaches the subject with a more focused lens, choosing to examine the prosecution from “the perspective of the individuals involved and their actions” (p. xii). Arguing many of the constitutional issues surrounding Davis’s trial, like the question about the legality of secession, and maintaining that national politics were actually secondary to the “actions and decisions of lesser-known men and women” in the failure to prosecute Davis, Icenhauer-Ramirez provides a detailed play-by-play of how and why Davis avoided trial and potentially, execution for treason. As he traces the story from Davis’s arrest through the various trial delays, attorney changes, legal arguments, and ultimately, President Johnson’s pardon on December 25, 1868, Icenhauer- Ramirez focuses on how the “lives and experiences” of those intimately involved in the process shaped and reshaped the outcome of the trial (p. ix). The cast of characters in this story includes Davis and his wife, Varina; a handful of attorney generals, including James Speed, Henry Stanbery, and William Evarts; the chief justice of the United States, Chase; US attorney Lucius Chandler; US district judge John C. Underwood; and Davis’s defense attorney, Charles O’Conor. Each plays an important role in determining Davis’s fate. Building his argument from close and detailed readings of the correspondence and diaries of these Citation: H-Net Reviews. Walser on Icenhauer-Ramirez, 'Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis'. H-Nationalism. 03-29-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/3911/reviews/7496062/walser-icenhauer-ramirez-treason-trial-united-states-v-jefferson Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Nationalism men and women, Icenhauer-Ramirez identifies four important themes that seem to shape the outcome of the trial more than other factors: the inexperience of the district attorney Chandler, the confusion created by the rotation of attorneys general under Johnson, the political ambitions of Chase and his reluctance to participate in the trial, and the ability of the defense attorneys and Varina Davis to recraft Jefferson Davis’s image throughout his imprisonment. Chandler’s lack of preparation for the indictment and the replacement of Attorney General Speed with Stanbery, who was far less interested in prosecuting Davis, hampered the ability of the prosecution to build a strong case early on. Meanwhile, Chase’s arms-length approach to presiding over the trial and constant delays in hopes of garnering a presidential nomination first allowed plenty of time for the defense to soften Davis’s image and begin convincing the public that the federal government was hesitant to even try Davis. While Icenhauer-Ramirez wisely avoids placing blame on a single person or event for the failure of the federal government’s prosecution of Davis, he convincingly demonstrates how each of these factors combined to make it nearly impossible for the trial to occur, let alone for the government to obtain a conviction. One of the highlights of Treason on Trial is the author’s ability to skillfully weave courtroom and legal analysis into the story of the trial. In one of the moments when the actors appear in court, Icenhauer- Ramirez points out to the reader how the “federal prosecutor missed an excellent opportunity” and presents a handful of arguments the young prosecutor could have made instead to strengthen his case (p. 185). Later, in an effort to explain why Chandler might not have been adequately prepared, Icenhauer-Ramirez uses personal experience to argue that “uncertainty about if or when a case will be tried can often lead to unpreparedness” as “an attorney who believes that a case will not be tried will find it exceptionally difficult to prepare with the intensity necessary” (p. 222). Moments like this provide important context for readers unfamiliar with the realities of legal practice and help emphasize the many contingencies involved in the efforts to prosecute Davis. Treason on Trial is noteworthy because of the different approach it takes to a topic that scholars have become increasingly interested in. Icenhauer-Ramirez claims that Cynthia Nicoletti’s award-winning book, Secession on Trial: The Treason Prosecution of Jefferson Davis (2017), which argues that the government “sought to mitigate the war’s disruption of the regular legal process by selecting a test case that would prove a final determination of secession’s constitutional and the war’s legitimacy,” is a “bold proposition, but the historical evidence is unconvincing” (p. xii). Instead, according to Icenhauer-Ramirez, the concerns about secession only emerged once the prosecuting lawyers became “convinced that the trial was pointless and used the argument as motivation for Johnson to concur in their request to dismiss the prosecution” (p. xiii). By focusing on the decisions individuals made and the legal minutiae instead of larger political and constitutional questions, Icenhauer-Ramirez tells a different story than Nicoletti but one that ultimately has the same outcome—a failure to prosecute Davis. Icenhauer-Ramirez, like Nicoletti, suggests that this failure has important implications for understanding the development of the Lost Cause and its understanding about the constitutionality of secession. However, because Treason on Trial is grounded in the individual actors and their choices, instead of larger constitutional issues like secession or national political movements surrounding Reconstruction, it occasionally struggles to clearly relate how the difficulties Davis’s prosecution faced connect to this larger context. While it serves as a powerful reminder of how important seemingly familiar narratives on a smaller scale can be, Treason on Trial is at its best when it is read alongside other books, like Nicoletti’s or William Blair’sWith Malice Toward Some: Treason and Loyalty in the Civil War Era (2014), that offer additional context to its story. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Walser on Icenhauer-Ramirez, 'Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis'. H-Nationalism. 03-29-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/3911/reviews/7496062/walser-icenhauer-ramirez-treason-trial-united-states-v-jefferson Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Nationalism Even though the many details Icenhauer-Ramirez provides can occasionally be a bit tedious and distract from the larger picture, Treason on Trial is well written and easily accessible for many different readers. It is certainly a must read for legal scholars of Reconstruction, and Civil War scholars will benefit from reconsidering why the federal government failed to prosecute Davis for treason and what that meant for the success of Reconstruction and American jurisprudence. Citation: Heather C. Walser. Review of Icenhauer-Ramirez, Robert,Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis. H-Nationalism, H-Net Reviews. March, 2021.URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=56425 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Walser on Icenhauer-Ramirez, 'Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis'. H-Nationalism. 03-29-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/3911/reviews/7496062/walser-icenhauer-ramirez-treason-trial-united-states-v-jefferson Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LINCOLN's OFFICIAL FAMILY-Bffiuography
    LINCOLN LORE Bulletin of the Lincoln National Life Foundation -- --- Dr. Louis A. WarreniEditor Published each week by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, ndlana Number 753 FORT WAYNE, INDIANA September 13, 1943 LINCOLN'S OFFICIAL FAMILY-BffiUOGRAPHY Sometimes the appearance of a new Salmon P. Chase, 1861-1864 Seward, F. W., Stward at Wa8hington book will call to the attention of the 1.18 Senat<w and Secretary of State, public a considerable number of titles Schuckers, J. W., Life and Public Serv· ices of Salm<m Portland Clwse, 1846·1881, 650pp., 1891. with which it may be classified. Gideon Seward, F. W., Seward at Washington \Velles, Lincoln's Navy Department, 669pp., 1874. is such a book. Chase, S. P., AgaimJt tl~ Re,Jealof the as Sent~.t<w and Secretary of State, Missottri Prohibition of Suwery, 1861-187!, 561pp., 1891. Just outside the pale which separates 16pJ>., 1854. Bancroft, F., Life of William H. Sew· Lincolniana from a general library is ard, 2 vols., 1900. an indefinite number of books called Luthin, R. H., Salmon P. Chase'tt P(}o­ collateral items. A bibliography of this litical Career Bef&re the Civil ll'ar. Seward, 0. R., William H. Seward's (23) pp., 1943. Travel• Arormd the World, 730pp., large number of Lincoln J'cference 1873. items has never been attempted, except Chase, S. P., Diary and Cor-rcttpon· in Civil War compilations, where many tlence of S. P. Cl1.0.11c, 2 vols., 1903. Seward, W. H., Recent SpeecJwg and of them properly belong, yet, most of Writing• of William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution
    Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Collection of Essays Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Collection of Essays Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission Kentucky Heritage Council © Essays compiled by Alicestyne Turley, Director Underground Railroad Research Institute University of Louisville, Department of Pan African Studies for the Kentucky African American Heritage Commission, Frankfort, KY February 2010 Series Sponsors: Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Kentucky Historical Society Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission Kentucky Heritage Council Underground Railroad Research Institute Kentucky State Parks Centre College Georgetown College Lincoln Memorial University University of Louisville Department of Pan African Studies Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission The Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission (KALBC) was established by executive order in 2004 to organize and coordinate the state's commemorative activities in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of President Abraham Lincoln. Its mission is to ensure that Lincoln's Kentucky story is an essential part of the national celebration, emphasizing Kentucky's contribution to his thoughts and ideals. The Commission also serves as coordinator of statewide efforts to convey Lincoln's Kentucky story and his legacy of freedom, democracy, and equal opportunity for all. Kentucky African American Heritage Commission [Enabling legislation KRS. 171.800] It is the mission of the Kentucky African American Heritage Commission to identify and promote awareness of significant African American history and influence upon the history and culture of Kentucky and to support and encourage the preservation of Kentucky African American heritage and historic sites.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM
    1 HISTORICAL FILES, Subject and Biographical A – Miscellaneous Abert, James Actors and Actresses Adair, John Adams Papers Adams, Daniel (Mrs.) Adkins, Betty Lawrence African American Genealogy African American History African Americans African Americans – Indiana African Americans – Kentucky African Americans – Louisville Ahrens, Theo (Jr.) Ainslie, Hew Alexander, Barton Stone Ali, Muhammad Allensworth, Allen Allison, John S. Allison, Young E. - Jr. & Sr. Almanacs Altsheller, Brent Alves, Bernard P. American Heritage American Letter Express Co. American Literary Manuscripts American Revolution American Revolution - Anecdotes American Revolution - Soldiers Amish - Indiana Anderson, Alex F. (Ship - Caroline) Anderson, James B. Anderson, Mary Anderson, Richard Clough Anderson, Robert Anderson, William Marshall Anderson, William P. Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 2 Andressohn, John C. Andrew's Raid (James J. Andrews) Antiques - Kentucky Antiquities - Kentucky Appalachia Applegate, Elisha Archaeology - Kentucky Architecture and Architects Architecture and Architects – McDonald Bros. Archival Symposium - Louisville (1970) Archivists and Archives Administration Ardery, Julia Spencer (Mrs. W. B.) Ark and Dove Arnold, Jeremiah Arthur Kling Center Asbury, Francis Ashby, Turner (Gen.) Ashland, KY Athletes Atkinson, Henry (Gen.) Audubon State Park (Henderson, KY) Augusta, KY Authors - KY Authors - KY - Allen, James Lane Authors - KY - Cawein, Madison Authors - KY - Creason, Joe Authors - KY - McClellan, G. M. Authors - KY - Merton, Thomas Authors - KY - Rice, Alice Authors - KY - Rice, Cale Authors - KY - Roberts, Elizabeth Madox Authors - KY - Sea, Sophie F. Authors - KY - Spears, W. Authors - KY - Still, James Authors - KY - Stober, George Authors - KY - Stuart, Jesse Authors - KY - Sulzer, Elmer G. Authors - KY - Warren, Robert Penn Authors - Louisville Auto License Automobiles Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 3 Awards B – Miscellaneous Bacon, Nathaniel Badin, Theodore (Rev.) Bakeless, John Baker, James G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics John P
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Indiana University Bloomington Maurer School of Law Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1941 The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics John P. Frank Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Frank, John P., "The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics" (1941). Articles by Maurer Faculty. Paper 1856. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1856 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE APPOINTMENT OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: PRESTIGE, PRINCIPLES AND POLITICS* JOHN P. FRANK Hidden in musty obscurity behind the forbidding covers of three hundred and more volumes of court reports, the Justices of the United States Supreme Court seldom emerge into public view. Deaths and retirements, new appointments, and occasional opinions attract fleeting attention; all else is unnoticed. But to the political scientist, to the historian, and, above all, to the lawyer, the Supreme Court is an object of vital concern. To the political scientist, the Court matters because it is the chief juggler in maintaining the Balance of Powers. To the historian, the Court matters because of its tre- mendous influence on the policies of federal and state governments.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    OFFICERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT [ 1 ] EXPLANATORY NOTE A Cabinet officer is not appointed for a fixed term and does not necessarily go out of office with the President who made the appointment. While it is customary to tender one’s resignation at the time a change of administration takes place, officers remain formally at the head of their department until a successor is appointed. Subordinates acting temporarily as heads of departments are not con- sidered Cabinet officers, and in the earlier period of the Nation’s history not all Cabinet officers were heads of executive departments. The names of all those exercising the duties and bearing the respon- sibilities of the executive departments, together with the period of service, are incorporated in the lists that follow. The dates immediately following the names of executive officers are those upon which commis- sions were issued, unless otherwise specifically noted. Where periods of time are indicated by dates as, for instance, March 4, 1793, to March 3, 1797, both such dates are included as portions of the time period. On occasions when there was a vacancy in the Vice Presidency, the President pro tem- pore is listed as the presiding officer of the Senate. The Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution (effective Oct. 15, 1933) changed the terms of the President and Vice President to end at noon on the 20th day of January and the terms of Senators and Representatives to end at noon on the 3d day of January when the terms of their successors shall begin. [ 2 ] EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, 1789–2005 First Administration of GEORGE WASHINGTON APRIL 30, 1789, TO MARCH 3, 1793 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—GEORGE WASHINGTON, of Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bamzai 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1501.Pdf
    +(,1 2 1/,1( Citation: Aditya Bamzai, The Attorney General and Early Appointments Clause Practice, 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1501 (2018) Provided by: University of Virginia Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Fri Sep 7 10:14:19 2018 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Use QR Code reader to send PDF to your smartphone or tablet device THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND EARLY APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE PRACTICE Aditya Bamzai* INTRODUCTION Among the structural provisions of the Constitution are a series of rules specifying the method by which the federal government will be staffed. One of those rules, contained in what is known as the Appointments Clause, estab- lishes the procedures for appointing "all ... Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not .. otherwise provided for" in the Constitu- tion-requiring one mechanism (presidential appointment and senate con- firmation) for "principal" officers and permitting a set of alternatives (appointment by the "President alone," the "Courts of Law," or the "Heads of Departments") for "officers" who are considered "inferior."' The Clause has traditionally been understood to require these appointment procedures for a subset of federal government employees who meet some constitutional threshold that establishes their status as "officers," rather than for all federal employees.2 In light of that understanding, the Clause naturally raises a question about the precise boundary between constitutional "officers" and other federal "employees"-a question that has recently been the subject of substantial litigation and extensive treatment within the executive branch 3 and the scholarly literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Surratt
    CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 0. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION - Story Preface 1. MARY SURRATT 2. EVENTS at the SURRATT BOARDINGHOUSE 3. JOHN WILKES BOOTH and HIS PLANS 4. CAPTURE and DEATH of JOHN WILKES BOOTH 5. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 6. FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT 7. EXECUTION of MARY SURRATT 8. AFTER THE CONSPIRACY TRIAL Mary Surratt and the other so-called "Lincoln Conspirators" were tried by a military commission, not by a jury of their peers. This contemporary image depicts the defendants, at the top of the picture, with Mrs. Surratt on the right side. Image online, Wikimedia Commons. While the soldiers were at Mary Surratt’s boardinghouse, the night of April 17, someone else knocked on the door. It was a disheveled-appearing man with a pick-axe in hand. Who was he? What did he want at that hour of the night? Inviting him in, the officer-in-charge asked the visitor about the purpose of his visit. He said he was checking with Mrs. Surratt, to see what time she wanted him to dig a gutter the next morning. Doubting the man was telling the truth, the officer summoned Mrs. Surratt. She swore she did not know him. After finding pictures of John Wilkes Booth - and Confederate generals - in the house, the soldiers took no chances. They arrested the visitor - Lewis Powell (a/k/a Lewis Payne) - Mrs. Surratt, and several other boardinghouse residents. With John Wilkes Booth still at-large, investigators wanted to build an assassination-conspiracy case.
    [Show full text]
  • Address by the Honorable Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General of the United
    ~tpartmtnt ~ustitt FOR RELEASE UPON DELIVERY ADDRESS BY THE HONORABLE GRIFFIN B. BELL ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE PHOENIX EXECUTIVES COUNCIL 7:30 P.M. DEL WEBB'S TOWNHOUSE PHOENIX, ARIZONA FRIDAY MARCH 3, 191,8 During the Christmas hQlidays I took the time to read the history of the Justice Department entitled IIFederal Justice." It was written in 1936 by former Attorney General Homer Cummings and his special assistant, Carl McFarland. It covers the office of Attorney General from 1789, and the Department of Justice from 1870, when it was created, through 1936. It is a story of history repeating itself. Many of the things in controversy today have been great issues in the past. Even the IBM case has a short life, only nine years to date, compared to the litigation that ensued over the telephone patents. That litigation lasted for 30 years. More correctly, the litigation covered just 15 years and it took an additional 15 years to find an Attorney General who had the courage to dismiss it, given the fact that the government lost. Several 'of the Attorneys General during this period sought the advice of Congress, hoping for some sharing of responsibility, but they were never able to raise a response. The first Attorney General was Edmund Randolph. The office of A~torney General was created in the First Congress, 1789. Randolph had served as an aide to General Washington and as an Attorney General of Virginia. He was a close friend of President Washington, as well as his lawyer but in that day, far from Watergate, no one suggested that he was disqualified by virtue of being a friend or, as some would say, a crony.
    [Show full text]
  • Acting Attorneys General
    Acting Attorneys General From 1870 until 1953, the Solicitor General served as Acting Attorney General in the event that the office of Attorney General was vacant or the Attorney General was absent or disabled. This plan of succession was modified by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1953 and by the codification in 1977 at 28 U.S.C. § 508 providing for the following statutory succession: Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, and in such order as the Attorney General shall designate, the Solicitor General and the Assistant Attorneys General. March 30, 1984 M e m o r a n d u m O p in io n f o r t h e A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l We have prepared in the time available a list of all of the documented occasions in which individuals have served as Acting Attorney General be­ cause of a vacancy in the office of the Attorney General.1 From the time of the establishment of the Department of Justice in 1870 until 1953, the statute governing succession to the office of Attorney General designated the Solicitor General as the individual who would be Acting Attorney General in case of the absence or disability, of the Attorney General, or of a vacancy in the office.2 Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1953, § 2, 67 Stat. 636 (1953), designated the Deputy Attorney General to be the first in order of succession, followed by the Solicitor General. This change was subsequently codified in 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Gallatin Porter Papers, 1759-1934
    Collection # M 0396 OMB 0017 ALBERT GALLATIN PORTER PAPERS, 1759-1934 Collection Information Biographical Sketch Scope and Content List of Prominent Individuals Whose Names Appear Box and Folder Inventory Calendar Cataloging Information Processed by Charles Latham November 1983 Transcripts Added by Ellen Swain Summer 1992 Updated 3 January 2002 Updated 11 May 2004 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 3 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, and 6 photographs COLLECTION DATES: 1759-1934 PROVENANCE: Gift of Mrs. Merrily Pierce, McLean, Virginia, 6 June 1983 and transcripts, 14 December 1991 RESTRICTIONS: None REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: Most of the collection is also held in transcript. See Series VI, Box 3. OTHER FINDING AIDS: none RELATED HOLDINGS: M 0639, Varney Porter ACCESSION NUMBER: 1983.0614, 1992.0069 NOTES: Six Indiana related maps in Series V, have been catalogued and L.C. classification numbers have been assigned, with cards filed in the IHSL browsing catalogue. For patrons requesting access to these maps by the LC classification number, they are located in Box 3, Folders 36 and 43 and stored in Flat File: FF 11-o and OMB 0017, (see also box and folder list). BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ALBERT GALLATIN PORTER 1824 - 1897 Albert G. Porter was born in Lawrenceburg, Indiana, the son of Thomas and Miranda Tousey Porter. The family soon moved to a farm across the Ohio River in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • [Table 7-6] CABINET NOMINATIONS, Since 1789 President/ Position
    [Table 7-6] CABINET NOMINATIONS, Since 1789 President/ Position Date of Confirmation Nominee Nomination 1 or Other Action 2 WASHINGTON_________________________________________________________________________ Edmund Randolph Attorney General Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 William Bradford Attorney General Jan. 24, 1794 Jan. 27, 1794 Charles Lee Attorney General Dec. 9, 1795 Dec. 10, 1795 Samuel Osgood Postmaster General Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 Timothy Pickering Postmaster General Nov. 1, 1789 Nov. 7, 1789 Joseph Habersham Postmaster General Feb. 24, 1795 Feb. 25, 1795 Thomas Jefferson State Sept. 25, 1789 Sept. 26, 1789 Edmund Randolph State Jan. 1, 1794 Jan. 2, 1794 Timothy Pickering State Dec. 9, 1795 Dec. 10, 1795 Alexander Hamilton Treasury Sept. 11, 1789 Sept. 11, 1789 Oliver Wolcott, Jr. Treasury Feb. 2, 1795 Feb. 3, 1795 Henry Knox War Sept. 11, 1789 Sept. 12, 1789 Timothy Pickering War Jan. 2, 1795 Jan. 2, 1795 James McHenry War Jan. 26, 1796 Jan. 27, 1796 Total Cabinet nominations = 14 ADAMS________________________________________________________________________________ Charles Lee Attorney General continued * [Theophilus Parsons Attorney General Feb. 18, 1801 Feb. 20, 1801 D] Benjamin Stoddert Navy May 18, 1798 May 21, 1798 Joseph Habersham Postmaster General continued * Timothy Pickering State continued * John Marshall State May 12, 1800 May 13, 1800 Oliver Wolcott, Jr. Treasury continued * Samuel Dexter Treasury Dec. 30, 1800 Dec. 31, 1800 James McHenry War continued * Samuel Dexter War May 12, 1800 May 13, 1800 [Lucius Stockton War Jan. 15, 1801 Jan. 29, 1801 W] Roger Griswold War Jan. 29, 1801 Feb. 3, 1801 25-5 Total Cabinet nominations =7 JEFFERSON____________________________________________________________________________ Levi Lincoln Attorney General Mar. 5, 1801 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Historic Markers
    Markers_2000_for_APHNYS_printou EntryNumberCounty Town Line1 Line2 Line3 Line4 Line5 Line6 Line7 Location TimePeriod 1 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF GENERAL BURGOYNE OVER THIS ROAD ENTERED ALBANY WITH HIS STAFF AFTER THE BATTLE OF SARATOGA GOING TO SCHUYLER MANSION AS PRISONERS OF WAR - 1777 PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1750-1799 2 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF BIRTHPLACE OF AMERICAN UNION NEAR THIS SITE, BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PRESENTED THE 1ST FORMAL PLAN OF NATIONAL UNION; CONGRESS OF 1754 PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1750-1799 3 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF ALBANY CALLED FORT NASSAU 1614, FORT ORANGE 1624, BEVERWYCK 1652, ALBANY 1664; CHARTERED 1686 PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1600-1649 4 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF COLONIAL WARPATH RENDEVOUS OF TROOPS IN FIVE WARS. HERE ARMIES UNDER ABERCROMBIE, LOUDOUN AND AMHERST MOVED TO THE CONQUEST OF CANADA 1756-60 PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1750-1799 5 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF IROQUOIS TREATY AUGUST 1684 BASIC PEACE BY GOV. DONGAN GOV. HOWARD OF VA. AND FIVE NATIONS AT COURT HOUSE WHICH STOOD 100 FEET WEST PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1650-1699 6 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF HENRY HUDSON EXPLORER, HERE ENDED THE VOYAGE OF THE HALF MOON IN QUEST OF THE INDIES SEPTEMBER, 1609 PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST. 1600-1649 7 ALBANY ALBANY, CITY OF FORT ORANGE SITE OF WEST INDIA COMPANY COLONY 1624. HERE WAS BORN SARAH RAPELJE, FIRST WHITE CHILD IN N. Y. STATE, 1625 FORT STOOD S. E. BY THE RIVER PLAZA, BROADWAY AT FOOT OF STATE ST.
    [Show full text]