MEASUREMENT and PREDICTION of TREE GROWTH REDUCTION from TREE PLANTING SPACE DESIGN in ESTABLISHED PARKING LOTS by Jason Grabosky1 and Edward Gilman2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MEASUREMENT and PREDICTION of TREE GROWTH REDUCTION from TREE PLANTING SPACE DESIGN in ESTABLISHED PARKING LOTS by Jason Grabosky1 and Edward Gilman2 154 Grabosky and Gilman: Tree Growth Reduction from Planting Space Design MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF TREE GROWTH REDUCTION FROM TREE PLANTING SPACE DESIGN IN ESTABLISHED PARKING LOTS by Jason Grabosky1 and Edward Gilman2 Abstract. Five species of trees were measured in 12- to 27-year- parking lot environment, and the unfortunate lack of old parking lots in north-central Florida, U.S. Tree species prophetic prowess of professionals for estimating attrition, evaluated were Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia Jacq.), live oak car hits, maintenance damage severity, pavement resurfac- (Quercus virginiana Mill.), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis L.), ing needs (accounting for the 15- to 25-year criterion), and shumard oak (Q. shumardii Britton), and laurel oak (Q. laurifolia design changes over time. Michx.). Tree growth in the parking lot planting zones was reduced as the surface area of nonpaved surface was reduced for While field wisdom and experience is useful, quite often all trees except live oak. Regression models yielded significant professionals charged with the design of planting spaces relationships with prediction value between parking lot detail have little or no training or experience beyond any casual space openings and tree size, measured by diameter at breast personal observation. Alternatively, the designer may height or by canopy radius. Normalization of the data within the consult an industry contact who also relies on general site allowed for multiple site analysis. A method for generating observation rather than measurement. As a result, ordi- similar data is introduced for development of regionally species- nance requirements may be met by creating tree planting specific growth reduction multipliers. Those multipliers can be spaces and tree species selection with tree growth expecta- used to better meet long-term canopy expectations or to advocate tions based on references for tree growth in parklike or for larger planting zones. Key Words. Chinese elm; live oak; sycamore; shumard oak; natural settings (Dirr 1990; Gerhold et al. 1993; Bassuk laurel oak; canopy size; trunk dbh; tree height. 1998; Gilman 1997; Porter 2000). Such references do not report reduced growth or basic tree–pavement design limitations; thus, designs meet the design letter of the law Concerns for environmentally sustainable urban develop- in planning for canopy but fail to meet the intent of the law ment and planning have grown with increases in urbaniza- due to lack of growth (McPherson 2001). While there is tion, exemplified by catchphrases such as “smart growth” anecdotal evidence that trees in parking lots are smaller and increased legislation with regard to environmental than those growing in less stressful environments, little data impacts. Outgrowths of these concerns are the development are available to document the effect. The goal of this study of community forest management plans and the adoption of was to determine the relationship between canopy area to municipal shade tree ordinances. Within many ordinances, diameter at breast height (dbh) and attempt a fitting and in recommendation templates for ordinance develop- coefficient for growth expectation based on site restrictions ment, there is language for the assignment of minimum as represented by open soil surface in the planting zone in canopy cover in the design of parking lots and industrial parking lot design detail. The information was used to development areas (Lee County 1990; ISA 2001; City of evaluate the expectation of growth in varied design details Sacramento 2003). for planning parking lot tree planting spaces to better meet Design of parking areas usually provides for some level the provisions of municipal tree ordinances. of tree canopy establishment, in balance with space concerns and capacity parking issues (ISA 2001; Garber MATERIALS AND METHODS 2000a, 2000b, 2000c). Tree ordinance language often In 2002, parking areas located throughout north-central provides formulae for calculating the required number of Florida, U.S., were selected for data collection to test the individual trees. Methods include using a canopy cover hypothesis of decreased canopy expectations for parking lot percentage, meeting a canopy target per unit of paved area, trees. Twelve- to thirty-year-old parking lots at malls, using a set number of trees per unit paved of area, or shopping centers, colleges, and universities were identified. mandating vegetation space per number of parking spaces. Upon securing permission from owners, each site was Often when a percentage of cover is mandated, there is a visited prior to data collection to verify adequate numbers time frame imposed for such a designated level of coverage of trees, the availability of suitable species, and the presence target to be fulfilled, such as 50% shade of the lot within 15 of a variety of tree–pavement design strategies. All sites years (ISA 2001; Barr Engineering 2001; City of Sacra- required a test species in the parking lot as well as the same mento 2003). A limitation of the growth prediction method species planted on the periphery of the lot in nonrestricted is the lack of measured tree growth impacts from the soil areas as part of the site construction project. Sites of Journal of Arboriculture 30(3): May 2004 155 Table 1. Site identification project age and species present on site for protocol for trunk diameter followed canopy analysis. recommendations in the Guide for Plant Age in Live Shumard Laurel Appraisal (CTLA 2000). Soil openings Site years Elms oaks Sycamores oaks oaks without pavement were measured and assigned into a size class rounded up to the UF O’Connell Center 20+ 39 nearest 9.29 m2 (100 ft2). For regression UF Track 20+ 19 analysis of measured tree parameters against Oaks Mall 24 52 24 49 available nonpaved space, several assump- Newberry Square 16 27 41 Santa Fe C.C. ‘A’ 11 10 tions were placed on the delineation of the Santa Fe C.C. ‘B,’ ‘C,’ ‘D’ 20+ 34 nonpaved root zone area. Where trees Santa Fe C.C. ‘E’ 15 7 shared a planting zone, the total zone was Paddock Mall 20 117 divided by the number of trees in the zone. Shands Hospital 20+ 24 Where pavement openings intersected at Orange Park Mall 27 49 points less than 15 cm (6 in.) wide, the Avenues Mall 12 111 68 planting zones were considered separately, The Park 15+ 19 unless visual evidence was present that the Total trees 287 241 78 43 41 roots were in both profiles. Where trees fit into an “unlimited” soil zone, the soil volume for further analysis was arbitrarily set to be 2 times the area within the data collection are shown with replicate counts in Table 1. drip line of the tree where no curbs were within 5 m (16.5 Tree species evaluated were Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia ft) of the trunk, and 1.5 times the area within the drip line Jacq.), live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.), sycamore in cases where pavement was within 5 m of the trunk. To (Platanus occidentalis L.), shumard oak (Q. shumardii prevent undue influence in the regression relationship, the Britton), and laurel oak (Q. laurifolia Michx.). The species mean of the control group calculated areas was used to were chosen because of their prevailing use and availability generate a group endpoint for the regression analysis, rather throughout the region. than regressing on the relationship generated from the Initial treatment codes were assigned to each tree based calculated soil areas based on the size of the control on the size and shape of their respective island, strip, and canopies. open planting area and their proximity to curbs and At older commercial sites, landscape maintenance pavement (Table 2). The design details encountered were companies had changed hands over the years, as had parking lot edge (large rooting zone, portion of canopy over ownership and management. Documentation indicating pavement), closed knuckle divider (zone surrounded by planting dates and installed tree size was difficult to pavement used to direct traffic flow), open knuckle divider acquire, when existent, and site maintenance profiles (surrounded by pavement and directing traffic flow, but (pruning, fertilization, and irrigation) were inconsistent. connected to open soil at one end), and vegetation strips Additionally, site conditions pertaining to construction, [long, interconnected root zone, placed in three classes: < 1 m (3.3 ft) wide, 1 to 3 m (3.3 to 10 ft) wide, and > 3 m Table 2. Description of treatment groupings in park- (10 ft) wide]. Sites used as controls featured open soil, no ing lot design analysis. Number of curbs was assigned pavement below canopy, and a large rooting zone. For for analysis of canopy size by design type. better interpretation, the zones were measured for area of Treatment group Number of curbs nonpaved soil surface. All trees on the site were measured and used except Parking edge distant 0 those known to be replacement trees for earlier losses. Tree Parking edge close 1 height to the nearest 0.31 m (1 ft) was determined using a Vegetation strip Suunto clinometer from a distance of 30.48 m (100 ft). >3 m 2 1–3 m 2 Average canopy radius was calculated from north, east, <1 m 2 south, and west canopy measurements to the nearest 15 cm Dual tree narrow oval 2 (6 in.) from tape measure center from trunk to branch tip. (>3:1 dimension ratio) The area below the drip line was calculated as a circle from the mean canopy radius per tree. Trunk diameter (dbh) was Columnar knuckle, L and T 3 if connected to larger soil zone measured to the nearest 1 mm (0.04 in.) at 1.37 m (4.5 ft) Columnar knuckle, L and T 4 if not connected to larger soil zone Triangulated knuckle 3 if connected to larger soil zone above soil. Trunk diameter on multiple trunks, the elms, Triangulated knuckle 4 if not connected to larger soil zone were calculated by the square root of the summation of the Classic tree pit opening 4 individual trunk diameters squared.
Recommended publications
  • Native Trees of Georgia
    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks (Quercus Spp.): a Brief History
    Publication WSFNR-20-25A April 2020 Oaks (Quercus spp.): A Brief History Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Quercus (oak) is the largest tree genus in temperate and sub-tropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere with an extensive distribution. (Denk et.al. 2010) Oaks are the most dominant trees of North America both in species number and biomass. (Hipp et.al. 2018) The three North America oak groups (white, red / black, and golden-cup) represent roughly 60% (~255) of the ~435 species within the Quercus genus worldwide. (Hipp et.al. 2018; McVay et.al. 2017a) Oak group development over time helped determine current species, and can suggest relationships which foster hybridization. The red / black and white oaks developed during a warm phase in global climate at high latitudes in what today is the boreal forest zone. From this northern location, both oak groups spread together southward across the continent splitting into a large eastern United States pathway, and much smaller western and far western paths. Both species groups spread into the eastern United States, then southward, and continued into Mexico and Central America as far as Columbia. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Today, Mexico is considered the world center of oak diversity. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Figure 1 shows genus, sub-genus and sections of Quercus (oak). History of Oak Species Groups Oaks developed under much different climates and environments than today. By examining how oaks developed and diversified into small, closely related groups, the native set of Georgia oak species can be better appreciated and understood in how they are related, share gene sets, or hybridize.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Acutissima (Sawtooth Oak)
    Green Gone Bad Featured Ornamental Plant: Quercus acutissima (Sawtooth Oak) Some exotic ornamental plants behave badly when they escape from the place they are planted. Infestations of these plants have negative impacts on natural environments. One of these plants is Quercus acutissima; common name: Sawtooth oak. Quercus acutissima is medium to large deciduous tree in the family Fagaceae. It is native to Asia but has been widely planted in the United States as an ornamental and as food for wildlife. Particular varieties have been developed for the abundant production of acorns early in the life of the tree. Quercus acutissima has recently begun invading forests in the eastern United States. Quercus acutissima grows up to 50 feet tall and forms a dense pyramidal crown that rounds with age. Leaves are alternate, simple, lanceolate, 3 to 7 inches long, pinnately veined with a very sharply serrate margin bearing bristle-tipped teeth. The leaves resemble some native tree species including American chestnut, Alleghany chinkapin, American beech, as well as the non-native Chinese chestnut. Acorns are oval with a cap that covers 1/2 of the nut with prominently curved scales resembling hair. Twigs are slender, red to gray-brown with multiple pubescent terminal buds. Mature bark is ridged, furrowed, and somewhat corky. The problem with Quercus acutissima is that it can escape from planted landscapes into natural areas. Early mast production has led to widespread planting of sawtooth oak as a wildlife food tree in natural areas and parks. Due to the large crop of acorns, this species can out-compete the seedlings of native oaks and other species, ultimately reducing plant diversity and wildlife habitat quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological, Anatomical, and Ecological Characteristics of Southern Live Oak
    PHYSIOLOGICAL, ANATOMICAL, AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUTHERN LIVE OAK Yadong Qi, Jammie Favorite, Kit L. Chin, and Ying Xiao1 Abstract—Gas exchanges of sun-exposed and shaded leaves of southern live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) were studied monthly from May to September, 2000. Six healthy live oak trees with d.b.h. ranging from 21 to 148 cm on Southern University’s campus in Baton Rouge, LA, were selected for the study. Instantaneous gas exchanges were measured during clear sky days from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. using a portable gas exchange system. Leaf chlorophyll, moisture content, and environ- mental conditions were also monitored. Anatomy of sun-exposed and shaded leaves was studied in July using a scanning electron microscopy. Sun-exposed leaves had significantly higher net carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake rate, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content, and significantly lower internal CO2 concentration and moisture content than the shaded leaves. The leaf anatomy related well to the leaf physiology. The sun-exposed leaves had a remarkably denser trichome layer and more closely packed palisade mesophyll cells than the shaded leaves. The combined leaf anatomy and physiology indicate that southern live oak possesses a unique ecological advantage of self defense against various environmental stresses. INTRODUCTION Increasing levels of atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse Southern live oak (Quercus virginiana, Mill.) is predominately gases are thought by many to be leading to increased atmo- a landscape and shade tree species that is considered a spheric temperatures (Nowak 1994a). Trees act as a sink for virtual emblem of the Old South. Live oak is a picturesque atmospheric CO2 by storing carbon (C) through their growth native tree found in the lower coastal plain of the Southeastern processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm-Resistant Trees for Mississippi Landscapes
    Storm-Resistant Trees for Mississippi Landscapes Mississippi has a humid, subtropical climate. Summers Ice Resistance are long and hot, but winters are relatively mild. Prevailing Occasional ice storms in Mississippi can be devastating southerly winds much of the year bring warm, humid to trees. Such storms occur when the polar jet stream dips air from the Gulf of Mexico across the state. Precipitation south in the winter. This phenomenon is known as the is distributed through the year with north Mississippi “Siberian Express,” and it brings arctic air and prolonged receiving about 55 inches and southern Mississippi freezing temperatures to the state. If a wet warm front about 65 inches. Southern Mississippi experiences more follows, then freezing rain and ice damage may result. In thunderstorms and hurricanes than the rest of the state. February 1994, a slow-moving front caused a severe ice The length of the state north to south spans several storm in the Deep South—across Arkansas, Tennessee, cold-hardiness zones, from 7b (5–10ºF average coldest Mississippi, and Alabama. Estimated damage was over $3 temperatures) in north Mississippi to 9a (20–25ºF average billion, and a million people were without power, some coldest temperatures) on the coast. Mississippi also has over a month. its share of stormy weather. These include occasional Tree species vary in their tolerance to ice accumulation. ice storms in winter; high winds from thunderstorms, Those species most resistant to breakage from ice generally hurricanes, and tornadoes; flooding from torrential rains; have strong branch attachment, flexible branches, low and storm surges from hurricanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Virginiana: Southern Live Oak1 Edward F
    ENH-722 Quercus virginiana: Southern Live Oak1 Edward F. Gilman, Dennis G. Watson, Ryan W. Klein, Andrew K. Koeser, Deborah R. Hilbert, and Drew C. McLean2 Introduction UF/IFAS Invasive Assessment Status: native Uses: street without sidewalk; shade; specimen; reclama- A large, sprawling, picturesque tree, usually graced with tion; parking lot island > 200 sq ft; tree lawn > 6 ft wide; Spanish moss and strongly reminiscent of the Old South. urban tolerant; highway median Southern live oak is one of the broadest spreading of the oaks, providing large areas of deep, inviting shade. It is the state tree of Georgia. Reaching 60 to 80 feet in height with a 60 to 120 foot spread and usually possessing many sinuously curved trunks and branches, Southern live oak is an impressive sight for any large-scale landscape. An amaz- ingly durable American native, it can measure its lifetime in centuries if properly located and cared for in the landscape. It makes an excellent street tree in the South. Unfortunately, oak wilt has devastated the tree in parts of central Texas. Give it plenty of room since the trunk can grow to more than six feet in diameter. Figure 1. Full Form—Quercus virginiana: southern live oak General Information Description Scientific name: Quercus virginiana Height: 60 to 80 feet Pronunciation: KWERK-us ver-jin-ee-AY-nuh Spread: 60 to 120 feet Common name(s): live oak, southern live oak Crown uniformity: symmetrical Family: Fagaceae Crown shape: spreading, round USDA hardiness zones: 7B through 10B (Figure 2) Crown density: dense Origin: native to the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal states of Growth rate: moderate the southeastern United States, in addition to south central Texture: fine Texas, and northeastern Mexico 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Trees Are Elemental Carbon Sinks in Urban Ecosystems: Patterns and Drivers
    EGU2020-10735 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10735 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Oak trees are elemental carbon sinks in urban ecosystems: patterns and drivers Alexandra Ponette-Gonzalez1, Jenna Rindy1,2, Tate Barrett1, Dongmei Chen3, Evan Elderbrock4, Yekang Ko4, Jun-Hak Lee4, Rebecca Sheesley5, and Kathleen Weathers6 1Department of Geography and the Environment, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305279, Denton, TX 76205, USA 2Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 USA 3Department of Geography, 1251 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1251, USA 4School of Architecture & Environment, 5249 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5249, USA 5Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, 1 Bear Place #97266, Waco, Texas 76798, USA 6Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, New York 12545, USA Cities represent a significant source of atmospheric elemental carbon (EC), a minor constituent of particulate matter (PM) but a major climate-forcing agent and air pollutant. Urban trees scavenge PM and regulate material fluxes to the ground. As such, urban trees represent potentially important sinks—not only for PM but also for EC—in urban landscapes. Here we assess the magnitude and spatiotemporal drivers of EC removal by trees in urban atmospheres. We quantified foliar EC accumulation by, as well as throughfall EC flux under, the canopy of two oak species (Quercus stellata: post oak; Quercus virginiana: live oak), which are widespread across the southern United States. Sampling was conducted from March 2017 to March 2018 across the City of Denton, a city at the northern edge of the Dallas-Forth Worth metropolitan area in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Virginiana Southern Live Oak1 Edward F
    Fact Sheet ST-564 October 1994 Quercus virginiana Southern Live Oak1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION A large, sprawling, picturesque tree, usually graced with Spanish moss and strongly reminiscent of the Old South, Live Oak is one of the broadest spreading of the Oaks, providing large areas of deep, inviting shade (Fig. 1). It is the state tree of Georgia. Reaching 40 to 60 feet in height with a 60 to 100 foot spread and usually possessing many sinuously curved trunks and branches, Live Oak is an impressive sight for any large-scale landscape. An amazingly durable American native, it can measure its lifetime in centuries if properly located and cared for in the Figure 1. Mature Southern Live Oak. landscape. It makes an excellent street tree in the South. Unfortunately, Oak wilt has devastated the tree Availability: generally available in many areas within in parts of central Texas. Give it plenty of room since its hardiness range the trunk can grow to more than six feet in diameter. DESCRIPTION GENERAL INFORMATION Height: 60 to 80 feet Scientific name: Quercus virginiana Spread: 60 to 120 feet Pronunciation: KWERK-us ver-jin-ee-AY-nuh Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a Common name(s): Southern Live Oak, Live Oak regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more Family: Fagaceae or less identical crown forms USDA hardiness zones: 7B through 10B (Fig. 2) Crown shape: round; spreading Origin: native to North America Crown density: dense Uses: large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in Growth rate: medium size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); recommended Texture: fine for buffer strips around parking lots or for median strip plantings in the highway; reclamation plant; shade Foliage tree; specimen; residential street tree; tree has been successfully grown in urban areas where air pollution, Leaf arrangement: alternate (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Health Care Recommendations for Live Oak in Texas
    Plant Health Care Recommendations for Live Oak in Texas Live oak (Quercus virginiana) is perhaps the most highly prized landscape tree throughout Texas. Native to the coastal plain and South Central Texas, live oak is widely planted in most areas of the state. A related species, commonly referred to as Plateau or Texas live oak (Q. fusiformis), is native to Central Texas through Oklahoma and mountainous areas of Mexico. Live oak is ideally suited for specimen plantings on residential properties, commercial sites and parks where there is ample space to accommodate the massive, spreading crown. Leaves remain green throughout the winter, hence the name live oak. The crown has a dense, spreading habit that provides shade for most of the year. Live oaks are known for their longevity and durability. Trees can live 200 years or more in undisturbed landscapes. Strong wood characteristics, the spreading, low branching habit and a deep root system combine to make this species highly resistant to storm damage. Like most trees, live oak thrives on moist well-drained soils. However, this species tolerates urban conditions including compacted or severely disturbed soils. Live oak tolerates drought conditions and root problems that lead to moisture stress. It is also tolerant of salt spray, which makes it an exceptional species for coastal plantings. Live oak is intolerant of excessive soil moisture due to poor drainage and excessive irrigation. Phytophthora root rot is prevalent in wet soils especially when live oak is growing in heavily irrigated lawns. In Texas, live oaks have a unique trait of “sending-up” sprouts from their root system to form new trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Live Oak(Quercus Virginiana)
    SMA Presents the 2013 Urban Tree of the Year: Southern Live Oak (Quercus virginiana) assive southern live oak (Quercus virgin- The Professionals on Southern Live Oak iana) was bested by little redbud in the 2010 SMA M ost people don’t know one tree from Urban Tree of the Year election. As this was announced Manother. That’s to be expected, but live oak is one at the SMA conference banquet in Savannah, Georgia of of those trees that just about everybody knows, can all places, many live oak fans cried, “We was robbed!” identify, and more importantly, loves. In the Gulf South Those old wounds can now begin to compartmentalize they routinely live upwards of 300 years, a fact that as live oak gets its proper due as the 2013 SMA Urban provokes awe and a certain jealousy among us humans. Tree of the Year. Their physical strength, wondrous canopies, and near- evergreen nature serve to connect us with the past. Southern live oak is a decurrent tree with low, arching, wide-spreading branches. Depending on climate, its I remember once in the early 1990s when R.J. Laverne ultimate height ranges from 40 to 60 feet (12 to 18 (then with ACRT) visited Baton Rouge as a consultant m) and width ranges from 50 to 80 feet (15 to 24 m) to help us craft an urban forestry management plan. or more. It is reliably hardy to Zone 7b. Southern live Having come down from Maine, he explained to me that oak, the state tree of Georgia, is native to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Live Oak: Planting, Care, & Pests
    Dendrology Series WSFNR15-7 March 2015 Live Oak: Planting, Care, & Pests by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia Live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) is a great tree of the Coastal Plain in the Southcentral and South- eastern United States. It can be massive and wide-spreading, or scrubby and small, depending upon the site where it grows. Live oak is both a cultural and an ecological asset in landscapes. Proper health care is essential for a sustainable and structurally stable tree. This publication will cover some of the more important parts of starting, growing and taking care of a live oak. Collect & Sow Growing live oaks from seed must be completed with care. Live oak acorns can be collected after October from trees. Acorns on the ground have a much lower germination percentage due to pests (like weevils) and from drying. Figure 1. Remove any acorn caps attached and float test acorns in a bucket of water – discarding floating acorns, caps and debris. Also, remove any acorns with small holes, shell cracks, or fungal growth. Do not use hot water baths or microwave heating to kill weevils within acorns as germination is severely impacted. Figure 2. The larger the acorns, the greater success in germination and early growth. Immediately sow gathered acorns in fertile, well-drained but moist, mineral soil. Acorn storage is not recommended, as fungal pests and drying quickly destroy germination potential. Short storage periods under cool, moist (high relative humidity not wet) conditions can be used for several weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Live-Oak-Publication Set-Two
    LiveLive Oak:Oak: Pillars of a Nation by Dr. Kim D. Coder, School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia Nov. 2003 Live oak (Quercus virginiana) can be a massive tree of the Southern coastal plain. Live oak is also a mature small tree growing on sand ridges near the ocean. Live oak as a species is represented by a diverse set of individual traits and a number of varieties and hybrids. Live oaks were the focus of the nation’s first publically owned timber reserves for building naval vessels. The largest trees were valuable to sailing ship builders because of their branch shapes and wood strength. Live oaks were also the first tree to suffer forest-wide timber thief and old growth decimation in North America. Live oak has served humans and animals as food, fuel, lumber, chemicals, and shade. Live oak is symbolic of history, survival, struggle, and romance. Today live oak represents both an ecological and a cultural heritage. The mystic feelings and grandeur of the Spanish moss-draped, monestrous live oak is a emblem of both the old and new South. Live oak was selected to represent the State of Georgia as its state tree. This publication looks at the scientific basis for the tree called “live oak.” Names Oaks are in the beech (Fagaceae) family. The oaks (Quercus spp.) are the largest genera of trees in the United States. The nation’s oak species are composed of approximately 58 trees and 12 shrubs. There are more than 70 recognized hybrids formed from the crossing of the various species.
    [Show full text]