DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 10.1 Intermolecular Forces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 10.1 Intermolecular Forces CHAPTER 10.1 INTERMOLECULAR FORCES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08kGgrqaZXA VARIATIONS IN COVALENT INTERMOLECULAR BONDS ION-DIPOLE INTERACTIONS •The attraction between the ions and the dipole of the water is greater than the attraction between oppositely charged ions. •This allows ionic substances to be dissolved in polar solvents. hydrogen bond THE HYDROGEN donor .. .. BOND .. ..F H O.. • Hydrogen bonds are a dipole- dipole intermolecular force. hydrogen bond acceptor • Hydrogen bonds can occur when hydrogen bond a H atom in a molecule is bound acceptor .. .. to a small, highly electronegative .. O H N atom, with lone pairs of electrons. hydrogen bond • The H from one of these donor molecules is attracted to the lone .. .. pairs of the electronegative atom .. N H F on another molecule. .. hydrogen bond hydrogen bond • Typically formed with H bond to acceptor donor N, O or F. HYDROGEN BONDS IN WATER Hydrogen bond donor Hydrogen bond acceptor QUESTION Which of the following compounds forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds? Answer: CH4 A CH3CH2SH B CH3CH2OH C PH3 D HYDROGEN BONDING & BOILING POINT • Boiling points increase with the mass of the substance. • Without hydrogen bonding water would boil at about -80°C. • Strong H bonding necessitates more energy to separate the molecules in order to form a gas . POLAR MOLECULES & DIPOLE- DIPOLE FORCES Molecules that are polar, but do not necessarily form hydrogen bonds (e.g. CH2Cl2), are able to influence each other when in liquid or solid form. Liquid Solid DIPOLE MOMENT & BOILING POINT POLARIZABILITY & CHARGE-INDUCED DIPOLE FORCES • Polarizability increases down a group. Distortion of an • The larger electron clouds, further from the electron cloud. nucleus are easier to polarize. • Polarizability decreases left to right across a O2(g) period. • Increased Zeff results in smaller electron clouds. • Cations are less polarizable than their parent O2(g) atom. Na+(g) • Anions are more polarizable than their parent atom. DISPERSION FORCES AMONG NONPOLAR MOLECULES • Nonpolar compounds can gain temporary polarity as their electrons move. • This polarity can influence the polarity of other compounds when they are close to each other. • Dispersion (London) forces are important in the attraction of all substances. DISPERSION FORCES & BOILING POINT The structure of a molecule will influence the forces that act upon it. Two different forms of C5H12 have different extents of dispersion forces, thus different boiling points. MOLECULAR MASS & BOILING POINT • Increased molecular mass correlates with an increase in the number of electrons. • A larger number of electrons allows for greater polarizability. • Heavier atoms, or molecules with more atoms, have greater dispersion forces and higher boiling points. • Based off the principles of intermolecular forces, which of the following will have a higher boiling point? . (a) He (b) Ne (c) Ar (d) Kr (e) Xe Answer: E • SUMMARY OF INTERMOLECULAR FORCES NON-COVALENT INTERACTIONS IN PROTEINS Ionic bonding Hydrogen bonding Dispersion forces QUESTION Rank the compounds below in order of increasing melting points (1=highest). Also determine the dominant intermolecular force for each compound in a pure solution. Rank Intermolecular Compound (1=highest) force Na2O 1 Ionic C3H8 4 Dispersion Hydrogen C2H5OH 3 bonding NaI 2 Ionic QUESTION In which series below are the compounds listed in order of increasing melting point? Answer: Na2O < NaI < C2H5OH < C3H8 A C3H8 < C2H5OH < NaI < Na2O B NaI < Na2O < C3H8 < C2H5OH C C2H5OH < C3H8 < Na2O < NaI D LECTURE OBJECTIVES • Chapter 10.2 • Distinguish between adhesive and cohesive forces. • Define viscosity, surface tension, and capillary rise. • Describe the roles of intermolecular forces in the above properties/phenomena. • Chapter 10.3 • Define phase transitions and phase transition temperatures. • Explain the relation between phase transition temperatures and intermolecular attractive forces. • Describe the processes represented by typical heating and cooling curves, and compute heat flows and enthalpy changes accompanying these processes. PROPERTIES OF THE LIQUID STATE • Surface tension • Capillarity • Viscosity THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF SURFACE TENSION • For a liquid, the surface molecules interact with fewer molecules than those “inside” the liquid. • Surface molecules have net a downward attraction due to the intermolecular forces. • Pushing into the liquid increases the total surface area, requiring energy to disrupt more of the attractive forces. SURFACE TENSION & INTERMOLECULAR FORCES Surface tension Substance Formula Major force(s) (J/m2) at 20°C dipole-dipole: Diethyl ether (CH3CH2)2O 1.7×10–2 dispersion Ethanol CH3CH2OH 2.3×10–2 H bonding H bonding; Butanol CH3(CH2)3OH 2.5×10–2 dispersion Water H2O 7.3×10–2 H bonding Metallic Mercury Hg 48×10–2 bonding Based off the principles of intermolecular forces, which of the following liquids will have a higher surface tension? (a) Hg (b) H2O (c) CH3CH2OCH2CH3 (d) CH3CH2OH (e) CH3CH2CH2OH CAPILLARY ACTION • The meniscus (top layer) of water in a thin tube is curved downward, whereas the meniscus for mercury is curved upwards. • Water can hydrogen bond (adhesive force) with the glass (SiO2) and forming these bonds pulls some water up the glass walls. • Hg forms metallic bonds which are much stronger than any dispersive forces with SiO2. The Hg pulls away from the glass surface and tries to form as many metallic bonds (cohesive force) as possible. VISCOSITY • The viscosity of a solution is related to how easily the molecules in the liquid can move past each other. • Higher temperatures increase molecular velocity, making it easier to overcome the attractive forces. • The shape of the molecules also influence the viscosity: small spherical molecules do not interact strongly with each other (e.g. CCl4), larger molecules interact more strongly with each other, restricting their movement. QUESTION Which of the following liquids would you expect to have the lowest surface tension? Answer: A Pb B CH3OCH3 C HOCH2CH2OH D H2O E CH3CH2OH Chapter 10 | Liquids and Solids 533 which reciprocal processes (for example, vaporization and condensation) occur at equal rates. The pressure exerted by the vapor in equilibrium with a liquid in a closed container at a given temperature is called the liquid’s vapor pressure (or equilibrium vapor pressure). The area of the surface of the liquid in contact with a vapor and the size of the vessel have no effect on the vapor pressure, although they do affect the time required for the equilibrium to be reached. We can measure the vapor pressure of a liquid by placing a sample in a closed container, like that illustrated in Figure 10.22, and using a manometer to measure the increase in pressure that is due to the vapor in equilibrium VAPORIZATION & CONDENSATIONwith the condensed phase. Chapter 10 | Liquids and Solids 533 • A liquid in a sealed container can whichvaporize reciprocal - processes with some (for example, of the vaporization liquid and condensation) occur at equal rates. The pressure exerted bybecoming the vapor in equilibrium a gas. with a liquid in a closed container at a given temperature is called the liquid’s vapor pressure (or equilibrium vapor pressure). The area of the surface of the liquid in contact with a vapor and the size of the vessel have no effect on the vapor pressure, although they do affect the time required for the equilibrium to be •reached.The Wegas can molecules measure the vapor moving pressure around of a liquid in by the placing a sample in a closed container, like that illustrated in Figure 10.22, and using a manometer to measure the increase in pressure that is due to the vapor in equilibrium withcontainer the condensed may phase. occasionally collide with the liquid - returning to the liquid phase (condensation). Figure 10.22 In a closed container, dynamic equilibrium is reached when (a) the rate of molecules escaping from the liquid to become the gas (b) increases and eventually (c) equals the rate of gas molecules entering the liquid. • When vaporization and condensation areWhen this equilibrium is reached, the vapor pressure of the gas is constant, although the vaporization and in equilibrium (at a given temperature) condensation processes continue. the pressure of the gas is termed the vapor pressure for the substance. The chemical identities of the molecules in a liquid determine the types (and strengths) of intermolecular attractions possible; consequently, different substances will exhibit different equilibrium vapor pressures. Relatively strong intermolecular attractive forces will serve to impede vaporization as well as favoring “recapture” of gas-phase Figure 10.22 In a closed container, dynamic equilibrium is reached when (a) the rate of molecules escaping from the liquid to become the gas (b) increases and eventually (c) equalsmolecules the rate when of gas they molecules collide entering with thethe liquidliquid. surface, resulting in a relatively low vapor pressure. Weak intermolecular When this equilibrium is reached, the vapor pressure of the gasattractions is constant, present although less the vaporization of a barrier and to vaporization, and a reduced likelihood of gas recapture, yielding relatively high condensation processes continue. vapor pressures. The following example illustrates this dependence of vapor pressure on intermolecular attractive forces. The chemical identities of the molecules in a liquid determine the types (and strengths) of intermolecular attractions possible; consequently,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.#Water;#Acid.Base#Reac1ons
    8/24/15 BIOCH 755: Biochemistry I Fall 2015 2.#Water;#Acid.base#reac1ons# Jianhan#Chen# Office#Hour:#M#1:30.2:30PM,#Chalmers#034# Email:#[email protected]# Office:#785.2518# 2.1#Physical#Proper1es#of#Water# • Key$Concepts$2.1$ – Water#molecules,#which#are#polar,#can#form#hydrogen#bonds#with# other#molecules.# – In#ice,#water#molecules#are#hydrogen#bonded#in#a#crystalline#array,#but# in#liquid#water,#hydrogen#bonds#rapidly#break#and#re.form#in#irregular# networks.# – The#aTrac1ve#forces#ac1ng#on#biological#molecules#include#ionic# interac1ons,#hydrogen#bonds,#and#van#der#Waals#interac1ons.# – Polar#and#ionic#substances#can#dissolve#in#water.# (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 2# 1 8/24/15 2.1#Physical#Proper1es#of#Water# • Key$Concepts$2.1$ – The#hydrophobic#effect#explains#the#exclusion#of#nonpolar#groups#as#a# way#to#maximize#the#entropy#of#water#molecules.# – Amphiphilic#substances#form#micelles#or#bilayers#that#hide#their# hydrophobic#groups#while#exposing#their#hydrophilic#groups#to#water.# – Molecules#diffuse#across#membranes#which#are#permeable#to#them# from#regions#of#higher#concentra1on#to#regions#of#lower# concentra1on.# – In#dialysis,#solutes#diffuse#across#a#semipermeable#membrane#from# regions#of#higher#concentra1on#to#regions#of#lower#concentra1on.# (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 3# Human#Body#Mass#Composi1on# (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 4 2 8/24/15 Structure#of#Water# (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 5 Water#Hydrogen#Bonding# ~1.8 Å, 180o Acceptor Donor (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 6# 3 8/24/15 Typical#Bond#Energies# (c)#Jianhan#Chen# 7# Hydrogen#bond#networks#of#water/ice# (c)#Jianhan#Chen#
    [Show full text]
  • A New Way for Probing Bond Strength J
    A New Way for Probing Bond Strength J. Klein, H. Khartabil, J.C. Boisson, J. Contreras-Garcia, Jean-Philip Piquemal, E. Henon To cite this version: J. Klein, H. Khartabil, J.C. Boisson, J. Contreras-Garcia, Jean-Philip Piquemal, et al.. A New Way for Probing Bond Strength. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, American Chemical Society, 2020, 124 (9), pp.1850-1860. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09845. hal-02377737 HAL Id: hal-02377737 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02377737 Submitted on 27 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A New Way for Probing Bond Strength Johanna Klein,y Hassan Khartabil,y Jean-Charles Boisson,z Julia Contreras-Garc´ıa,{ Jean-Philip Piquemal,{ and Eric H´enon∗,y yInstitut de Chimie Mol´eculaire de Reims UMR CNRS 7312, Universit´ede Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la Housse 51687 Reims Cedex 02 BP39 (France) zCReSTIC EA 3804, Universit´ede Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la Housse 51687 Reims Cedex 02 BP39 (France) {Sorbonne Universit´es,UPMC, Laboratoire de Chimie Th´eoriqueand UMR CNRS 7616, 4 Pl Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05(France) E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +33(3)26918497 1 Abstract The covalent chemical bond is intimately linked to electron sharing between atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc
    Metal-Metal (MM) Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc Richard H. Duncan Lyngdoh*,a, Henry F. Schaefer III*,b and R. Bruce King*,b a Department of Chemistry, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India B Centre for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602 ABSTRACT: This survey of metal-metal (MM) bond distances in binuclear complexes of the first row 3d-block elements reviews experimental and computational research on a wide range of such systems. The metals surveyed are titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc, representing the only comprehensive presentation of such results to date. Factors impacting MM bond lengths that are discussed here include (a) n+ the formal MM bond order, (b) size of the metal ion present in the bimetallic core (M2) , (c) the metal oxidation state, (d) effects of ligand basicity, coordination mode and number, and (e) steric effects of bulky ligands. Correlations between experimental and computational findings are examined wherever possible, often yielding good agreement for MM bond lengths. The formal bond order provides a key basis for assessing experimental and computationally derived MM bond lengths. The effects of change in the metal upon MM bond length ranges in binuclear complexes suggest trends for single, double, triple, and quadruple MM bonds which are related to the available information on metal atomic radii. It emerges that while specific factors for a limited range of complexes are found to have their expected impact in many cases, the assessment of the net effect of these factors is challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Noncovalent Interactions Involving Microsolvated Networks of Trimethylamine N-Oxide
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Noncovalent Interactions Involving Microsolvated Networks Of Trimethylamine N-Oxide Kristina Andrea Cuellar University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Physical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Cuellar, Kristina Andrea, "Noncovalent Interactions Involving Microsolvated Networks Of Trimethylamine N-Oxide" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 407. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/407 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NONCOVALENT INTERACTIONS INVOLVING MICROSOLVATED NETWORKS OF TRIMETHYLAMINE N-OXIDE Kristina A. Cuellar A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Physical Chemistry University of Mississippi August 2014 Copyright © 2014 Kristina A. Cuellar All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This thesis research focuses on the effects of the formation of hydrogen-bonded networks with the important osmolyte trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). Vibrational spectroscopy, in this case Raman spectroscopy, is used to interpret the effects of noncovalent interactions by solvation with select hydrogen bond donors such as water, methanol, ethanol and ethylene glycol in the form of slight changes in vibrational frequencies. Spectral shifts in the experimental Raman spectra of interacting molecules are compared to the results of electronic structure calculations on explicit hydrogen bonded molecular clusters. The similarities in the Raman spectra of microsolvated TMAO using a variety of hydrogen bond donors suggest a common structural motif in all of the hydrogen bonded complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Bond
    HYDROGEN BOND Hydrogen bond is not a real bond, actually it is a type of electrostatic attraction. It plays very important role in the case of water. So let’s learn more about it with the example of water molecule. You have studied bonding and hybridization of H2O molecule. H2O is a bent shaped molecule. There is a considerable electronegativity difference between H and O atoms which makes the H-O bond polar. More electronegative O pulls bonding pair of electrons and acquires a partial negative charge while Hydrogen develops a partial positive charge. When two molecules of water come closer, the electrostatic force comes in action. Partially negative charged Oxygen of one molecule attracts partially positive charged Hydrogen of another molecule by electrostatic attraction. Electron rich Oxygen shares its lone pair of electron with electron deficient Hydrogen atom and forms an invisible bond of attraction which is called Hydrogen bond. This electrostatic attraction isn’t sufficiently strong to form an ionic bond and the electrons are not shared enough to make it a coordinate covalent bond, but this attraction is somehow capable of keeping the molecules together. Hydrogen bond is represented by a dotted line. It is weaker than ionic and covalent bond. But it is solely responsible for the amazing nature of water. Let’s see how it makes water so wonderful. Hydrogen bonds make a network of water molecules which is responsible for the liquid state of water. When we try to evaporate water into vapours, we need to break a large number of hydrogen bonds to let water molecule free from the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Covalent Short Range Interactions
    WORKSHOP Nanoscience on the Tip Non-Covalent Short Range Interactions Table of Contents: 1. Motivation ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Short Range Interactions and Surface Forces ...................................................... 1 3. Van der Waals Interactions for Point Interactions ............................................... 3 4. Surface Forces...................................................................................................... 4 5. Hamaker Constant................................................................................................ 5 6. Van der Waals Retardation Effects ...................................................................... 6 7. Adhesion and Surface Energies............................................................................ 6 8. Cutoff Distance for Van der Waals Calculations................................................. 7 9. Capillary Forces due to Vapor Condensation ...................................................... 8 10. Critical Humidity for Capillary Neck Formation................................................. 9 11. Estimation of the Tip Radius Utilizing the Capillary Effects ............................10 12. Modification of Hydrophobicity (Wettability)................................................... 12 13. Force Displacement Curves ............................................................................... 13 References ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interplay of Ring Puckering and Hydrogen Bonding In
    Article Cite This: J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 7087−7103 pubs.acs.org/JPCA Interplay of Ring Puckering and Hydrogen Bonding in Deoxyribonucleosides Published as part of The Journal of Physical Chemistry virtual special issue “Leo Radom Festschrift”. ‡ ‡ Siying Lyu, Nassim Beiranvand, Marek Freindorf, and Elfi Kraka* Computational and Theoretical Chemistry Group (CATCO), Department of Chemistry, Southern Methodist University, 3215 Daniel Ave, Dallas, Texas 75275-0314, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: The Cremer−Pople ring puckering analysis and the Konkoli−Cremer local mode analysis supported by the topological analysis of the electron density were applied for the first comprehensive analysis of the interplay between deoxy- ribose ring puckering and intramolecular H-bonding in 2′- deoxycytidine, 2′-deoxyadenosine, 2′-deoxythymidine, and 2′- deoxyguanosine. We mapped for each deoxyribonucleoside the complete conformational energy surface and the corresponding pseudorotation path. We found only incomplete pseudorotation cycles, caused by ring inversion, which we coined as pseudolibration paths. On each pseudolibration path a global and a local minimum separated by a transition state were identified. The investigation of H-bond free deoxyribonucleo- side analogs revealed that removal of the H-bond does not restore the full conformational flexibility of the sugar ring. Our work showed that ring puckering predominantly determines the conformational energy; the larger the puckering amplitude, the lower the conformational energy. In contrast no direct correlation between conformational energy and H-bond strength was found. The longest and weakest H-bonds are located in the local minimum region, whereas the shortest and strongest H-bonds are located outside the global and local minimum regions at the turning points of the pseudolibration paths, i.e., H-bonding determines the shape and length of the pseudolibration paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition Metal Activation and Functionalization of Carbon-Hydrogen Bonds
    FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BY University of Rochester River Campus Rochester, New York 14627 FOR TRANSITION METAL ACTIVATION AND FUNCTIONALIZATION OF CARBON-HYDROGEN BONDS William D. Jones, Principal Investigator Phone: 716-275-5493 Contract No. DE-FG02-86ER13569 Project Period: December 1, 1998 - November 30, 2001 Total Award Amount (3 years): $ 396,000 Unexpended Balance at End of Grant Period: $0 DOE Report, 1998-2001 2 William D. Jones Overview of Research Accomplishments for the Period Dec. 1, 1998-Nov. 30, 2001: These past 3 years, our research has focussed on the items presented in our proposal where we have had success. These include: (1) carbon-carbon bond cleavage reactions, (2) fundamental studies of C-H bond cleavage reactions of trispyrazolylboraterhodium complexes, (3) catalytic C-H and C-C bond functionalization, and (4) carbon-fluorine bond activation. We have made progress in each of these areas, as described in the following report, and will continue our studies in these areas. Our carbon-carbon bond cleavage study is based upon the notion that metal-phenyl bonds are the strongest metal-carbon bonds. Cleavage of the C-C bonds in biaryl systems will therefore give two very strong metal-aryl bonds, and consequently offers the most thermodynamically preferred situation for observing C-C cleavage. We have had extensive success in C-C cleavage with biphenylene, a molecule with a weaker C-C bond than biphenyl. The success includes not only several new nickel, palladium, and platinum based metal systems of the type [M(chelating phosphine)] but also related rhodium systems for C-C cleavage.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrostatic Potential Topology for Probing Molecular Structure, Bonding and Reactivity
    molecules Review Electrostatic Potential Topology for Probing Molecular Structure, Bonding and Reactivity Shridhar R. Gadre 1,* , Cherumuttathu H. Suresh 2,* and Neetha Mohan 2 1 Department of Chemistry, Interdisciplinary School of Scientific Computing, Savitribai Phule University, Pune 411007, India 2 Chemical Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Trivandrum 695019, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.R.G.); [email protected] (C.H.S.) Abstract: Following the pioneering investigations of Bader on the topology of molecular electron density, the topology analysis of its sister field viz. molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) was taken up by the authors’ groups. Through these studies, MESP topology emerged as a powerful tool for exploring molecular bonding and reactivity patterns. The MESP topology features are mapped in terms of its critical points (CPs), such as bond critical points (BCPs), while the minima identify electron-rich locations, such as lone pairs and π-bonds. The gradient paths of MESP vividly bring out the atoms-in-molecule picture of neutral molecules and anions. The MESP-based characterization of a molecule in terms of electron-rich and -deficient regions provides a robust prediction about its interaction with other molecules. This leads to a clear picture of molecular aggregation, hydrogen bonding, lone pair–π interactions, π-conjugation, aromaticity and reaction mechanisms. This review summarizes the contributions of the authors’ groups over the last three decades and those of the Citation: Gadre, S.R.; Suresh, C.H.; other active groups towards understanding chemical bonding, molecular recognition, and reactivity Mohan, N. Electrostatic Potential through topology analysis of MESP.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Bonds
    Hydrogen Bonds Hydrogen bonds have played an incredibly important role in the history of structural biology. Both the structure of DNA and of protein a-helices and b-sheets were predicted based largely on the hydrogen bonds these structures form. So understanding hydrogen bonds is clearly important, but much like the hydrophobic effect, hydrogen bonds are surprisingly complex and are not completely understood in every last detail. So take the things I will tell you with a grain of salt. The electrostatic nature of hydrogen bonds Hydrogen bonds are formed when an electronegative atom approaches a hydrogen atom bound to another electro-negative atom. The most common electro negative atoms in biochemical systems are oxygen (3.44) and nitrogen (3.04) while carbon (2.55) and hydrogen (2.22) are relatively electropositive (the electronegativity values are given on the Pauling scale, and don’t have a direct physical meaning). A gradient in electronegativity along a covalent bond results in the more electronegative ions pulling shared electrons towards themselves resulting in an electric dipole along the bond. One obvious result of this is that the two dipoles will attract one another in the type of simple electrostatic dipole-dipole interaction we learned about earlier in class. As you know this interaction falls off with 1/r3 so the interaction will only matter between nearest neighbors. This dipole-dipole interaction provides much of the source for a hydrogen bond’s energy. Lets see how much energy this type of interaction is worth. For example in a helix the dipole along the peptide bond is roughly +0.4 -0.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluorine in a C−F Bond As the Key to Cage Formation
    Angewandte Minireviews Chemie International Edition: DOI: 10.1002/anie.201710423 Fluorinated Cage Molecules German Edition: DOI: 10.1002/ange.201710423 Fluorine in a CÀF Bond as the Key to Cage Formation Maxwell Gargiulo Holl, Cody Ross Pitts, and Thomas Lectka* cage molecules · fluorine · hydrogen bonds · neighboring group effects · noncovalent interactions Cage molecules have long been employed to trap reactive or transient species, as their rigid nature allows them to enforce situations that otherwise would not persist. In this Minireview, we discuss our use of rigid cage structures to investigate the close noncovalent interactions of fluorine with other functional groups and determine how mutual proximity affects both physical properties and reactivity. Unusual Weak cages are exemplified by inter- covalent interactions of fluorine are also explored: the cage can close actions of the CÀF bond with C=C and to form the first solution-phase C-F-C fluoronium ion. C=O bonds, stronger cages are re- vealed by hydrogen bonding interac- tions (F···HO, F···HC); and a B···F 1. Introduction interaction is only predicted to form a cage in its transition state. The strongest cage is represented As the most electronegative element, fluorine usually gets by a symmetrical C-F-C fluoronium ion, in which the C-F-C its way with other atoms, much in the manner a wild cat gets interaction is highly covalent. A weak cage arises again in his way with prey. Once part of a CÀF bond, the fluorine atom novel aromatic substitution chemistry in which F interacts is tamed and has a much-diminished desire to interact with an aryl ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity
    Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity and Silanes Water, water everywhere is the refrain from the rhyme of the ancient mariner and a concern of every modern coatings technologist. hether decorative, protective are playing an increasing role in controlling the inter- or functional, coatings must action of water with a surface. contend with water in the Silanes are silicon chemicals that possess a hydrolyti- environment. A problem dis- cally sensitive center that can react with inorganic sub- tinct from the issue of wet strates such as glass to form stable covalent bonds and Wadhesion and hydrolytic stability of coatings is con- organic substitution that alters the physical interac- trolling the interaction of water with a coated surface. tions of treated substrates (Figure 1). Different than Very often the descriptors hydrophobic or hydrophilic most additives, which have a limited performance are applied to coated surfaces. Although the terms range, they can achieve surface properties ranging from hydrophobic and hydrophilic are casually used, they hydrophobic to hydrophilic. They may be a sole active are usually not defined. A growing number of applica- ingredient or a component in a coatings formulation, tions ranging from architectural coatings to aortic controlling the interaction of water over a broad spec- stents require a precise control and, therefore, precise trum of requirements. In order to understand how definition of substrate interaction with water. Silanes silanes can affect hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity, it is important to understand some of the fundamentals of Figure 1 | Silanes and surface modification. the interaction of water with surfaces. OCH 2CH 3 Water, Hydrophobicity CH 3CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 2— Si — OCH 2CH 3 and Hydrophilicity Hydrophobic and hydrophilic are frequently used OCH CH 2 3 descriptors of surfaces.
    [Show full text]