DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Data Report Geology and Terrain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Data Report Geology and Terrain Technical Data Report Geology and Terrain Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Jacques Whitford AXYS Ltd. Edmonton, Alberta D. O'Leary, B.A. M. Trommelen, M.Sc. D. Huntley, Ph.D. 2010 Preface This technical data report (TDR) relies primarily on data collected up to September 2008. These data are used in the environmental and socio-economic assessment (ESA) for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, Volume 6A, Section 7. Some minor discrepancies may occur between this TDR and the ESA because of the differing datasets. Geology and Terrain Technical Data Report Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Spatial Boundaries........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Terminology.................................................................................................................... 1-2 2 Methods........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Review of Existing Data Sources.................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Terrain Mapping.............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Field Surveys................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Terrain Field Program................................................................................................2-1 2.3.2 Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping Field Program..........................................................2-3 2.3.3 Soil Field Program .....................................................................................................2-3 2.4 Detailed Mapping............................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.1 Surficial Material .......................................................................................................2-5 2.4.2 Surface Expression.....................................................................................................2-5 2.4.3 Geomorphic Modifying Processes .............................................................................2-5 2.4.4 On-Site Symbol Mapping...........................................................................................2-5 2.4.5 Post-fieldwork Classification and Ratings – PEAA...................................................2-9 2.4.6 Additional Mapping – Pipeline Route........................................................................2-9 2.4.6.1 Depth to Bedrock ....................................................................................2-9 2.4.6.2 Thickness of Organics.............................................................................2-9 2.5 Identification of Geohazards ......................................................................................... 2-10 2.5.1 Mass Wasting...........................................................................................................2-10 2.5.1.1 Deep-seated Landslides.........................................................................2-10 2.5.1.2 Shallow to Moderately Deep Slides......................................................2-10 2.5.1.3 Debris Flows .........................................................................................2-11 2.5.1.4 Rockfall.................................................................................................2-11 2.5.1.5 Avalanches............................................................................................2-11 2.5.1.6 Lateral Spreading ..................................................................................2-11 2.5.1.7 Stream Erosion and Sedimentation .......................................................2-12 2.5.1.8 Wind and Water Erosion (Shallow Stream and Overland Flow) ..........2-12 2.5.2 Settlement.................................................................................................................2-12 2.5.2.1 Consolidation Settlement ......................................................................2-12 2.5.2.2 Karst-induced Settlement or Displacement...........................................2-12 2.5.3 Seismicity.................................................................................................................2-13 2.5.3.1 Seismic Motion .....................................................................................2-13 2.5.3.2 Liquefaction ..........................................................................................2-13 2.5.4 Tsunami....................................................................................................................2-13 2.5.5 Acid Rock Drainage.................................................................................................2-13 2.6 Quality Control.............................................................................................................. 2-13 2.6.1 Preliminary Mapping................................................................................................2-13 2.6.2 Field Inventory Program ..........................................................................................2-14 2010 Page i Geology and Terrain Technical Data Report Table of Contents 2.6.3 Final Mapping and Classification............................................................................ 2-14 3 Results of Baseline Investigations................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Eastern Alberta Plains ..................................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.1 Topography and Bedrock Geology............................................................................ 3-3 3.1.2 Hydrography.............................................................................................................. 3-4 3.1.3 Surficial Geology....................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.4 Geohazards................................................................................................................ 3-8 3.2 Southern Alberta Uplands ............................................................................................... 3-8 3.2.1 Topography and Bedrock Geology............................................................................ 3-8 3.2.2 Hydrography.............................................................................................................. 3-9 3.2.3 Surficial Geology..................................................................................................... 3-10 3.2.4 Geohazards.............................................................................................................. 3-15 3.2.4.1 Deep-Seated Slides............................................................................... 3-16 3.2.4.2 Shallow to Moderately Deep Slides ..................................................... 3-16 3.2.4.3 Lateral Stream Erosion, Scour and Sedimentation............................... 3-17 3.2.4.4 Wind and Water Erosion...................................................................... 3-17 3.2.4.5 Consolidation Settlement...................................................................... 3-17 3.3 Alberta Plateau .............................................................................................................. 3-18 3.3.1 Topography and Bedrock Geology.......................................................................... 3-18 3.3.2 Hydrography............................................................................................................ 3-19 3.3.3 Surficial Geology..................................................................................................... 3-19 3.3.4 Geohazards.............................................................................................................. 3-21 3.4 Rocky Mountains .......................................................................................................... 3-21 3.4.1 Topography and Bedrock Geology.......................................................................... 3-21 3.4.2 Hydrography............................................................................................................ 3-22 3.4.3 Surficial Geology..................................................................................................... 3-23 3.4.4 Geohazards - PDA................................................................................................... 3-27 3.4.4.1 Shallow to Moderately Deep Slides ..................................................... 3-27 3.4.4.2 Rockfall................................................................................................ 3-28 3.4.4.3 Debris Flows ........................................................................................ 3-28 3.4.4.4 Avalanches ........................................................................................... 3-28 3.4.4.5 Lateral Stream Erosion, Scour and Sedimentation............................... 3-28 3.4.4.6 Overland Flow Erosion........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infiltration from the Pedon to Global Grid Scales: an Overview and Outlook for Land Surface Modeling
    Published June 24, 2019 Reviews and Analyses Core Ideas Infiltration from the Pedon to Global • Land surface models (LSMs) show Grid Scales: An Overview and Outlook a large variety in describing and upscaling infiltration. for Land Surface Modeling • Soil structural effects on infiltration in LSMs are mostly neglected. Harry Vereecken, Lutz Weihermüller, Shmuel Assouline, • New soil databases may help to Jirka Šimůnek, Anne Verhoef, Michael Herbst, Nicole Archer, parameterize infiltration processes Binayak Mohanty, Carsten Montzka, Jan Vanderborght, in LSMs. Gianpaolo Balsamo, Michel Bechtold, Aaron Boone, Sarah Chadburn, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Received 22 Oct. 2018. Agnès Ducharne, Michael Ek, Sebastien Garrigues, Accepted 16 Feb. 2019. Klaus Goergen, Joachim Ingwersen, Stefan Kollet, David M. Lawrence, Qian Li, Dani Or, Sean Swenson, Citation: Vereecken, H., L. Weihermüller, S. Philipp de Vrese, Robert Walko, Yihua Wu, Assouline, J. Šimůnek, A. Verhoef, M. Herbst, N. Archer, B. Mohanty, C. Montzka, J. Vander- and Yongkang Xue borght, G. Balsamo, M. Bechtold, A. Boone, S. Chadburn, M. Cuntz, B. Decharme, A. Infiltration in soils is a key process that partitions precipitation at the land sur- Ducharne, M. Ek, S. Garrigues, K. Goergen, J. face into surface runoff and water that enters the soil profile. We reviewed the Ingwersen, S. Kollet, D.M. Lawrence, Q. Li, D. basic principles of water infiltration in soils and we analyzed approaches com- Or, S. Swenson, P. de Vrese, R. Walko, Y. Wu, and Y. Xue. 2019. Infiltration from the pedon monly used in land surface models (LSMs) to quantify infiltration as well as its to global grid scales: An overview and out- numerical implementation and sensitivity to model parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI GMS-5, Geology of the Powers Quadrangle, Oregon
    o thickness of about 1,500 feet. The southern outcrop terminates against the Sixes River fault, indicat­ Intermediate intrusive rocks, mainly diorite and quartz diorite, intrude the Gal ice Formation ing that the last movement involved down-faulting along the north side. south of the Sixes River fault. One stock, covering nearly 2 square miles, is bisected by Benson Creek, Megafossils are present in some of the bedded basal sandstone. Forominifera examined by W. W. and numerous small dikes are present nearby. One of the largest dikes extends from Rusty Creek eastward Rau (Baldwin, 1965) collected a short distance west of the mouth of Big Creek along the Sixes River were through the Middle Fork of the Sixes River into Salman Mountain. These intrusive racks are described by assigned a middle Eocene age . A middle Eocene microfauna in beds of similar age near Powers was ex­ Lund and Baldwin ( 1969) and are correlated with the Pearse Peak diorite of Koch ( 1966). The Pearse amined by Thoms (Born, 1963), and another outcrop along Fourmile Creek to the north contained a mid­ Peak body, which intrudes the Ga lice Formation along Elk River to the south, is described by Koch (1966, GEOLOGICAL MAP SERIES dle Eocene molluscan fauna (Allen and Baldwin, 1944). Phillips (1968) also collected o middle Eocene p. 51-52) . fauna in middle Umpqua strata along Fourmile Creek, o short distance north of the mapped area. Lode gold deposits reported by Brooks and Ramp ( 1968) in the South Fork of the Sixes drainage and on Rusty Butte are apparently associated with the dioritic intrusive bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Camper's Guide to Alberta Parks
    Discover Value Protect Enjoy The Camper’s Guide to Alberta Parks Front Photo: Lesser Slave Lake Provincial Park Back Photo: Aspen Beach Provincial Park Printed 2016 ISBN: 978–1–4601–2459–8 Welcome to the Camper’s Guide to Alberta’s Provincial Campgrounds Explore Alberta Provincial Parks and Recreation Areas Legend In this Guide we have included almost 200 automobile accessible campgrounds located Whether you like mountain biking, bird watching, sailing, relaxing on the beach or sitting in Alberta’s provincial parks and recreation areas. Many more details about these around the campfire, Alberta Parks have a variety of facilities and an infinite supply of Provincial Park campgrounds, as well as group camping, comfort camping and backcountry camping, memory making moments for you. It’s your choice – sweeping mountain vistas, clear Provincial Recreation Area can be found at albertaparks.ca. northern lakes, sunny prairie grasslands, cool shady parklands or swift rivers flowing through the boreal forest. Try a park you haven’t visited yet, or spend a week exploring Activities Amenities Our Vision: Alberta’s parks inspire people to discover, value, protect and enjoy the several parks in a region you’ve been wanting to learn about. Baseball Amphitheatre natural world and the benefits it provides for current and future generations. Beach Boat Launch Good Camping Neighbours Since the 1930s visitors have enjoyed Alberta’s provincial parks for picnicking, beach Camping Boat Rental and water fun, hiking, skiing and many other outdoor activities. Alberta Parks has 476 Part of the camping experience can be meeting new folks in your camping loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Hydraulic Erosion Simulation and Visualization on GPU
    Fast Hydraulic Erosion Simulation and Visualization on GPU Xing Mei Philippe Decaudin Bao-Gang Hu CASIA-LIAMA/NLPR, Beijing, China INRIA-Evasion, Grenoble, France CASIA-LIAMA/NLPR, Beijing, China xmei@(NOSPAM)nlpr.ia.ac.cn & CASIA-LIAMA, Beijing, China hubg@(NOSPAM)nlpr.ia.ac.cn philippe.decaudin@(NOSPAM)imag.fr Figure 1. Illustration of our erosion simulation on a ”PG”-shaped mountain. (a) The initial terrain. (b) Terrain is being eroded by rainfall. The dissolved soil (denoted by green color) is transported by the water flow (blue). (c) The eroded terrain and the deposited sediment (red) after the rainfall and during the evaporation. Abstract 1. Introduction Natural mountains and valleys are gradually eroded by Natural terrains exhibit a lot of complex shapes such rainfall and river flows. Physically-based modeling of this as valleys, ridges, sand ripples and crests. These geomor- complex phenomenon is a major concern in producing re- phological structures are mostly determined by the erosion alistic synthesized terrains. However, despite some recent phenomenon: soil is dissolved and transported by the wa- improvements, existing algorithms are still computationally ter flow, sand is carried away by the wind, and stones are expensive, leading to a time-consuming process fairly im- decomposed into small blocks by the temperature. Erosion practical for terrain designers and 3D artists. simulation has always been an important research topic in landscape design [5, 8], since it greatly enhances the realism In this paper, we present a new method to model the hy- of the synthesized terrains. draulic erosion phenomenon which runs at interactive rates We focus on hydraulic erosion, which is the predominant on today’s computers.
    [Show full text]
  • State Standard for Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines
    ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES FLOOD MITIGATION SECTION State Standard For Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines Under the authority outlined in ARS 48-3605(A) the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources establishes the following standard for Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines in Arizona. State Standard for Hydrologic Modeling, or “guidelines for the experienced modeler”, has been developed to address hydrologic conditions for a variety of statewide watersheds. Included are problems and situations identified by the State Standard Work Group (SSWG) and floodplain managers. The intended audience is statewide; engineers, professionals and Floodplain Administrators. The following topics are included: • Hydrologic Model comparison and recommendation • Guidelines and parameters • Model application for specific situations, and associated hydrologic parameters • Precipitation values (NOAA 14) • Storm duration • Unique conditions, such as wildfire burn, overgrazing, logging, drought, rapid snowmelt, urbanization. The State Standard includes examples addressing the above key issues. This requirement is effective August, 2007. Copies of this State Standard and the State Standard Technical Supplement can be obtained by contacting the Department’s Water Engineering Section at (602) 771-8652. SS10-07 1 August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose and Background .......................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Drainage Basins As Fundamental Units for Mine Closure Planning: Aurora and Pastor I Quarries
    Natural Drainage Basins as Fundamental Units for Mine Closure Planning: Aurora and Pastor I Quarries Cristina Martín-Moreno1, María Tejedor1, José Martín1, José Nicolau2, Ernest Bladé3, Sara Nyssen1, Miguel Lalaguna2, Alejandro de Lis1, Ivón Cermeño-Martín1 and José Gómez4 1. Faculty of Geological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain 2. Polytechnic School, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain 3. Institut FLUMEN, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain 4. Fábrica de Alcanar, Cemex España ABSTRACT The vast majority of the Earth’s ice-free land surface has been shaped by fluvial and related slope geomorphic processes. Drainage basins are consequently the most common land surface organization units. Mining operations disrupt this efficient surface structure. Therefore, mine restoration lacking stable drainage basins and networks, “blended into and complementing the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain” (in the sense of SMCRA 1977), will be always limited. The pre-mine drainage characteristics cannot be replicated, because mining creates irreversible changes in earth physical properties and volumes. However, functional drainage basins and networks, adapted to the new earth material properties, can and should be restored. Dominant current mine restoration practice, typically, either lacks a drainage network or has a deficient, non-natural, drainage design. Extensive literature provides evidence that this is a common reason for mined land reclamation failure. These conventional drainage engineered solutions are not reliable in the long term without guaranteed constant maintenance. Additionally, conventional landform design has low ecological and visual integration with the adjoining landscapes, and is becoming rejected by public and regulators, worldwide. For these reasons, fluvial geomorphic restoration, with a drainage basin approach, is receiving enormous attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Erosion of Soil and Terrain Atira Odhner, Joseph Fleming 2009 Abstract
    Hydraulic Erosion of Soil and Terrain Atira Odhner, Joseph Fleming 2009 Abstract We have developed an algorithm for hard and soft water-based terrain erosion. Additionally, we have added a rain generation into the simulator. The algorithm is based upon fluid simulation, but is simplified, while still preserving the fluid motion effects. Introduction Our goal is to design an algorithm that generates water-eroded terrain quickly for the purposes of artistic productions, rather than scientific study. We wish to simulate the effects of rivers and streams, taking into account erosion, transportation, and sedimentation. Other algorithms take into account full fluid simulation, but we wished to obtain similar results by using a less-costly yet water- based erosion algorithm. Previous Work There are many examples of previous work on the subject of erosion, as it is important for both the graphics community and the environmental conservation community. We have chosen a few that are both relevant to the our algorithm, and demonstrate natural and atmospheric effects related to our algorithm. Since there are so many similar works (often repeating themselves), these studies are introduced by relevance, rather than by year. In 2005, Beneš and Arriaga [1] proposed a method for generating table mountains. Table mountains are desert geological structures that are very narrow, yet water-based erosion; plateaus with almost vertical cliff walls. These mountains form through mostly thermal erosion rather than by; rock that is exposed deteriorates. For this reason, table mountains are found in desert environments. The algorithm in this paper is not water-based, but it relates to the erosion of river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Rainfall Impulses Through Progressively Larger Drainage Basins in Steep Forested Terrain
    Tracking rainfall impulses through progressively larger drainage basins in steep forested terrain ROBERT R. ZIEMER & RAYMOND M. RICE USDA Forest Service,Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Arcata, California 95521, USA ABSTRACT The precision of timing devices in modern electronic data loggers makes it possible to study the routing of water through small drainage basins having rapid responses to hydrologic impulses. Storm hyetographs were measured using digital. tipping bucket raingauges and their routing was observed at headwater piezometers located mid-slope, above a swale, and near the swale. Downslope, flow was recorded from naturally occurring soil pipes draining the 0.8-ha swale, Progressing downstream from the swale, streamflow was measured at stations gauging nested basins of 16, 156, 217, and 383 ha. Peak lag time significantly (p = 0.035) increased downstream. Peak unitareadischarge decreased downstream, but the relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.456). The processes involved in the delivery of rainfall from hillsides, to swales, and through progessively larger stream channels in steep forested watersheds are not fully understood. Most hydrologic concepts concerning the routing of flood hydrographs have developed from observations on large rivers. It is usually assumed that downstream hydrographs are lagged in time and flattened to produce later peaks and smaller unit area peak discharges (Chow, 1964). There are few reports of hydrograph routing in small, steep upland watersheds. Researchers working in steep forested watersheds generally agree that classic Hortonian overland flow (Horton, 1933) rarely occurs because the infiltration rate of forest soils usually exceeds precipitation rates. Despite several studies conducted in the past 20 years,the pathways of muting rainfall into and through hillslope soils in forested basins remain poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method of Watershed Delineation for Flat Terrain Using Sentinel-2A Imagery and DEM: a Case Study of the Taihu Basin
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article A Method of Watershed Delineation for Flat Terrain Using Sentinel-2A Imagery and DEM: A Case Study of the Taihu Basin Leilei Li 1,2,*, Jintao Yang 2,3 and Jin Wu 2,3 1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China; [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (J.W.) 3 State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-18911719037 Received: 4 September 2019; Accepted: 24 November 2019; Published: 26 November 2019 Abstract: Accurate watershed delineation is a precondition for runoff and water quality simulation. Traditional digital elevation model (DEM) may not generate realistic drainage networks due to large depressions and subtle elevation differences in local-scale plains. In this study, we propose a new method for solving the problem of watershed delineation, using the Taihu Basin as a case study. Rivers, lakes, and reservoirs were obtained from Sentinel-2A images with the Canny algorithm on Google Earth Engine (GEE), rather than from DEM, to compose the drainage network. Catchments were delineated by modifying the flow direction of rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and overland flow, instead of using DEM values. A watershed was divided into the following three types: Lake, reservoir, and overland catchment. A total of 2291 river segments, seven lakes, eight reservoirs, and 2306 subwatersheds were retained in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3, Appendix E-1: Overall Geotechnical Report on The
    AMEC Earth & Environmental a division of AMEC Americas Limited 2227 Douglas Road, Burnaby, BC Canada V5C 5A9 Tel +1 (604) 294-3811 Fax +1 (604) 294-4664 www.amec.com Overall Geotechnical Report on the Pipeline Route Rev. R for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Bruderheim, Alberta to Kitimat, BC Submitted to: Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Calgary, Alberta Submitted by: AMEC Earth & Environmental, a division of AMEC Americas Limited Burnaby, BC September 9, 2009 Revised March 26, 2010 AMEC File: EG0926008 3001 Document Control No. 1123-RG-20100326 Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Overall Geotechnical Report Rev. R Bruderheim, Alberta to Kitimat, BC September 9, 2009 Revised March 26, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Overview ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Organization ............................................................................................................. 2 2.0 SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Eastern Alberta Plains .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Terrain, Territory Stuart Elden Prog Hum Geogr 2010 34: 799 Originally Published Online 21 April 2010 DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362603
    Progress in Human Geography http://phg.sagepub.com/ Land, terrain, territory Stuart Elden Prog Hum Geogr 2010 34: 799 originally published online 21 April 2010 DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362603 The online version of this article can be found at: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/34/6/799 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Progress in Human Geography can be found at: Email Alerts: http://phg.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://phg.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/34/6/799.refs.html Downloaded from phg.sagepub.com at SWETS WISE ONLINE CONTENT on December 13, 2010 Article Progress in Human Geography 34(6) 799–817 ª The Author(s) 2010 Land, terrain, territory Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav 10.1177/0309132510362603 phg.sagepub.com Stuart Elden Durham University, UK Abstract This paper outlines a way toward conceptual and historical clarity around the question of territory. The aim is not to define territory, in the sense of a single meaning; but rather to indicate the issues at stake in grasping how it has been understood in different historical and geographical contexts. It does so first by critically interrogating work on territoriality, suggesting that neither the biological nor the social uses of this term are particularly profitable ways to approach the historically more specific category of ‘territory’. Instead, ideas of ‘land’ and ‘terrain’ are examined, suggesting that these political-economic and political-strategic rela- tions are essential to understanding ‘territory’, yet ultimately insufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 GMC Terrain Catalog
    LIVE 2020 LIKE A PRO GMC TERRAIN 20GMCTERRC-25 LIVE LIKE A PRO As a pro, the status quo is not an acceptable status. Pushing forward and improving on what came before is the only path to real rewards. That’s why we’ve built an SUV that’s game for whatever the day demands. With its bold stance and masculine design, two turbocharged engine options and size-defying capabilities, Terrain is the compact SUV that plays big. Experience the SUV for you—the 2020 GMC Terrain. SOME MISSION STATEMENTS ARE CARVED IN STONE; WE USE SHEET METAL, ALUMINUM AND PASSION I MULTIDIMENSIONAL GRILLE I LED HEADLAMPS WITH GMC SIGNATURE C-SHAPE DESIGN I 19" BRIGHT MACHINED ALUMINUM WHEELS WITH PREMIUM GRAY PAINTED ACCENTS I NEWLY UPGRADED PREMIUM SUSPENSION SETTLE IN, BUT NEVER SETTLE TERRAIN OFFERS AN ARRAY OF PREMIUM MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT: I LEATHER-WRAPPED STEERING WHEEL I AUTHENTIC ALUMINUM TRIM I SOFT-TOUCH INSTRUMENT PANEL I VENTILATED FRONT SEATS ARE AVAILABLE (DENALI ONLY) I HEATED SECOND-ROW OUTBOARD SEATS ARE AVAILABLE (DENALI ONLY) Terrain’s cabin welcomes you with a leather-wrapped steering wheel, authentic aluminum trim and a soft-touch instrument panel to create a premium environment no matter which trim level you choose. To further enhance your experience, heated and ventilated front seats are available. DOESN’T NEED CHROME TO SHINE I 19" GLOSS-BLACK PAINTED ALUMINUM WHEELS I DARKENED GRILLE I BLACK MIRROR CAPS AND ROOF RAILS I BLACK EXTERIOR ACCENTS AND TRIM BADGING The Terrain Elevation Edition goes all in with a bold presence—telling the world that something unique is headed its way.
    [Show full text]