Ziggurat 1 Ziggurat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ziggurat 1 Ziggurat Ziggurat 1 Ziggurat Ziggurats (Akkadian ziqqurat, D-stem of zaqāru "to build on a raised area") were massive structures built in the ancient Mesopotamian valley and western Iranian plateau, having the form of a terraced step pyramid of successively receding stories or levels. Notable ziggurats include the Great Ziggurat of Ur near Nasiriyah, Iraq; the Ziggurat of Aqar Quf near Baghdad, Iraq; Chogha Zanbil in Khūzestān, Iran; and Sialk near Kashan, Iran. Description Ziggurats were built by the Sumerians, The reconstructed facade of the Neo-Sumerian Great Ziggurat of Ur, near Nasiriyah, Iraq Babylonians, Elamites, Akkadians, and Assyrians for local religions. Each ziggurat was part of a temple complex which included other buildings. The precursors of the ziggurat were raised platforms that date from the Ubaid period[1] during the fourth millennium BC. The earliest ziggurats began near the end of the Early Dynastic Period.[2] The latest Mesopotamian ziggurats date from the 6th century BC. Built in receding tiers upon a rectangular, oval, or square platform, the ziggurat was a pyramidal structure with a flat top. Sun-baked bricks made up the core of the ziggurat with facings of fired bricks on the outside. The facings were often glazed in different colors and may have had astrological significance. Kings sometimes had their names engraved on these glazed bricks. The number of tiers ranged from two to seven. It is assumed that they had shrines at the top, but there is no archaeological evidence for this and the only textual evidence is from Herodotus.[3] Access to the shrine would have been by a series of ramps on one side of the ziggurat or by a spiral ramp from base to summit. The Mesopotamian ziggurats were not places for public worship or ceremonies. They were believed to be dwelling places for the gods and each city had its own patron god. Only priests were permitted on the ziggurat or in the rooms at its base, and it was their responsibility to care for the gods and attend to their needs. The priests were very powerful members of Sumerian society. One of the best-preserved ziggurats is Chogha Zanbil in western Iran. The Sialk ziggurat, in Kashan, Iran, is the oldest known ziggurat, dating to the early 3rd millennium BC. Ziggurat designs ranged from simple bases upon which a temple sat, to marvels of mathematics and construction which spanned several terraced stories and were topped with a temple. An example of a simple ziggurat is the White Temple of Uruk, in ancient Sumer. The ziggurat itself is the base on which the White CAD rendering of Sialk's largest ziggurat based Temple is set. Its purpose is to get the temple closer to the heavens, on archeological evidence. and provide access from the ground to it via steps. The Mesopotamians believed that these pyramid temples connected heaven and earth. In fact, the ziggurat at Babylon was known as Etemenankia or "House of the Platform between Heaven and Earth". Ziggurat 2 An example of an extensive and massive ziggurat is the Marduk ziggurat, or Etemenanki, of ancient Babylon. Unfortunately, not much of even the base is left of this massive structure, yet archeological findings and historical accounts put this tower at seven multicolored tiers, topped with a temple of exquisite proportions. The temple is thought to have been painted and maintained an indigo color, matching the tops of the tiers. It is known that there were three staircases leading to the temple, two of which (side flanked) were thought to have only ascended half the ziggurat's height. Etemenanki, the name for the structure, is Sumerian and means "The Foundation of Heaven and Earth". The date of its original construction is unknown, with suggested dates ranging from the fourteenth to the ninth century BC, with textual evidence suggesting it existed in the second millennium.[4] Interpretation and significance According to Herodotus, at the top of each ziggurat was a shrine, although none of these shrines has survived.[1] One practical function of the ziggurats was a high place on which the priests could escape rising water that annually inundated lowlands and occasionally flooded for hundreds of miles, as for example the 1967 flood.[5] Another practical function of the ziggurat was for security. Since the shrine was accessible only by way of three stairways,[6] a small number of guards could prevent non-priests from spying on the rituals at the shrine on top of the ziggurat, such as cooking of sacrificial food and burning of carcasses of sacrificial animals. Each ziggurat was part of a temple complex that included a courtyard, storage rooms, bathrooms, and living quarters, around which a city was built.[7] Ziggurat-inspired modern architecture The ziggurat style of architecture continues to be used and copied today in many places of the world. In the United States, some examples include: • The Temple of Eck in Chanhassen, Minnesota. • The University of Tennessee Hodges Library in Knoxville, Tennessee. • The United States Bullion Depository Gold Vault in Fort Knox, Kentucky. • The National Geographic Society headquarters in Washington, DC, designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. • The Chet Holifield Federal Building in Laguna Niguel, California, designed by William Pereira. • The Ziggurat in West Sacramento, California, headquarters of the California Department of General Services. • The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York was conceived by architect Frank Lloyd Wright as an "inverted ziggurat." Examples in the United Kingdom: • Halls of residence for students at the University of East Anglia, in Norwich, United Kingdom. • The SIS Building, also commonly known as the MI6 Building, which is the headquarters of the British Secret Intelligence Service. • Birmingham Central Library in Birmingham, England is an inverted ziggurat form designed by John Maldin, a powerful example of the Brutalist style. Examples in Baghdad: • A number of state buildings on Haifa street[8] and Babel hotel in Baghdad Examples in Russia and Romania: • The Palace of Soviets (unfinished) in Moscow, Russia, designed by Iofan, Schuko, and Gelfreikh. • The Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest, Romania Example in Budapest: • A look-out tower near to the National Theater of Budapest, Hungary. Ziggurat 3 The Ziggurat of Sacramento, The SIS Building The University of Tennessee Ziggurats at the University California Hodges Library of East Anglia Chet Holifield Federal Building, Ziggurat in Budapest, Laguna Niguel, California Hungary Notes [1] Crawford, page 73 [2] Crawford, page 73-74 [3] Crawford, page 85 [4] George , Andrew (2007) "The Tower of Babel: Archaeology, history and cuneiform texts" Archiv fuer Orientforschung, 51 (2005/2006). pp. 75-95. (http:/ / eprints. soas. ac. uk/ 3858/ 2/ TowerOfBabel. AfO. pdf), [5] Aramco World Magazine, March–April 1968, pages 32-33 [6] Crawford, page 75 [7] Oppenheim, pages 112, 326-328 [8] http:/ / maps. google. com/ maps?hl=en& geocode=& q=haifa+ street& sll=33. 268546,44. 87915& sspn=1. 389309,2. 221985& ie=UTF8& t=k& ll=33. 33419,44. 385645& spn=0. 002712,0. 00434& z=18 References • T. Busink, "L´origine et évolution de la ziggurat babylonienne". Jaarbericht van het Vooraziatisch-Egyptisch Genootschap Ex Oriente Lux 21 (1970), 91-141. • R. Chadwick, "Calendars, Ziggurats, and the Stars". The Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies Bulletin (Toronto) 24 (Nov. 1992), 7-24. • R.G. Killick, "Ziggurat". The Dictionary of Art (ed. J. Turner, New York & London: Macmillan), vol. 33, 675-676. • H.J. Lenzen, Die Entwicklung der Zikurrat von ihren Anfängen bis zur Zeit der III. Dynastie von Ur (Leipzig 1942). • M. Roaf, Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East (New York 1990), 104-107. • E.C. Stone, "Ziggurat". The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East (ed. E.M. Meyers, New York & Oxford 1997), vol. 5, 390-391. • J.A. Black & A. Green, "Ziggurat". Dictionary of the Ancient Near East (eds. P. Bienkowski & A. Millard, London: British Museum), 327-328. • Harriet Crawford, Sumer and the Sumerians, Cambridge University Press, (New York 1993), ISBN 0-521-38850-3. • A. Leo Oppenheim, Ancient Mesopotamia, University of Chicago Press, (Chicago 1977), ISBN 0-226-63187-7. • Beck, Roger B.; Linda Black, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C. Naylor, Dahia Ibo Shabaka, (1999). World History: Patterns of Interaction. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell. ISBN 0-395-87274-X. Ziggurat 4 • Leick, Gwendolyn (2002). Mesopotamia: The Invention of the City. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-140-265-740. External links • Website of Choqa Zanbil ziggurat, Iran. (http:/ / www. chogha-zanbil. com/ ) • Article on status of Sialk ziggurat, Iran. (http:/ / www. iranian. com/ History/ 2004/ April/ Sialk/ index. html) Article Sources and Contributors 5 Article Sources and Contributors Ziggurat Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=444998864 Contributors: -js-, 119, 1ForTheMoney, 2D, AWhiteC, Aamrun, Adam Bishop, Adamjmartinez, AdjustShift, Aeternium, Aforcez, Alansohn, Ale jrb, Alexander Mclean, Allstarecho, Alpha Quadrant (alt), AmiDaniel, Anaxial, Andi d, AndreaAllison, Andres, Angela, Animum, AnonGuy, Anthonyalbright, Apeloverage, ArcAngel, ArielGold, Arthena, Aruton, Ashley Y, Backslash Forwardslash, Basawala, Beej, Bevo, Biggerrack, Billy ruth, Blainster, Bless sins, Bnguyen, Bobo192, Boccobrock, Brandon, Bryan Derksen, C.Fred, Caknuck, Caltas, Cameronc, Can't sleep, clown will eat me, Capricorn42, Casper2k3, Celarnor, Charliewillits, CharlotteWebb, Chrislk02, Chzz, Claggz, Columbiafan, CommonsDelinker, Coolcaesar, Courcelles,
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Neo Babylonian Rule
    Neo Babylonians Rule “The Most Accomplished Empire” *Clears throat* Thank you. Thank you ever so much distinguished colleagues and professors for inviting me to speak to you today. As many of you know I'm professor Olivia Eichman of archeological studies at Stanford University. I have also worked at various dig sites in ancient sumers regions. All of these excavations lead me to countless degrees in antiquity. Enough about me already, I'm here to talk to you about about the great Mesopotamian Empires. But which empire was the greatest? Was it the Akkadians with the first empire? Or the Assyrians who reigned the longest? Neither of these empires strike me as the most accomplished. The Neo Babylonian’s Empire was the most accomplished empire by far and when you leave this room today I guarantee you will think as highly of them as I do too. Why do I think that the Neo Babylonians are the most accomplished? For starters, their ruler knew how to keep his empire safe. He had many safety precautions. One way Nebuchadrezzar II insured safety among his people was by surrounding their city in a wall so great in size two chariots could ride on it side by side. But that isn't all. No. Nebuchadnezzar II built another wall inside of the other wall for added protection. Both walls were named after Mesopotamian gods and goddesses. One of the gates that was built was called Ishtar gate, named after the goddess of war and love. To top it all off the walls were surrounded by a moat.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads 360 Virtual Tour Script Edited
    Crossroads of Civilization Virtual Tour Script Note: Highlighted text signifies content that is only accessible on the 360 Tour. Welcome to Crossroads of Civilization. We divided this exhibit not by time or culture, but rather by traits that are shared by all civilizations. Watch this video to learn more about the making of Crossroads and its themes. Entrance Crossroads of Civilization: Ancient Worlds of the Near East and Mediterranean Crossroads of Civilization looks at the world's earliest major societies. Beginning more than 5,000 years ago in Egypt and the Near East, the exhibit traces their developments, offshoots, and spread over nearly four millennia. Interactive timelines and a large-scale digital map highlight the ebb and flow of ancient cultures, from Egypt and the earliest Mesopotamian kingdoms of the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, to the vast Persian, Hellenistic, and finally Roman empires, the latter eventually encompassing the entire Mediterranean region. Against this backdrop of momentous historical change, items from the Museum's collections are showcased within broad themes. Popular elements from classic exhibits of former years, such as our Greek hoplite warrior and Egyptian temple model, stand alongside newly created life-size figures, including a recreation of King Tut in his chariot. The latest research on our two Egyptian mummies features forensic reconstructions of the individuals in life. This truly was a "crossroads" of cultural interaction, where Asian, African, and European peoples came together in a massive blending of ideas and technologies. Special thanks to the following for their expertise: ● Dr. Jonathan Elias - Historical and maps research, CT interpretation ● Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. White Temple and Its Ziggurat Uruk (Modern Warka, Iraq). Sumerian. C. 3500 – 3000 B.C.E. Mud Brick. (2 Images) • Article
    12. White Temple and its ziggurat Uruk (modern Warka, Iraq). Sumerian. C. 3500 – 3000 B.C.E. Mud brick. (2 images) Article at Khan Academy dedicated to the sky god Anu, this temple would have towered well above (approximately 40 feet) the flat plain of Uruk, and been visible from a great distance—even over the defensive walls of the city where city life began more than five thousand years ago and where the first writing emerged—was clearly one of the most important places in southern Mesopotamia A ziggurat is a built raised platform with four sloping sides—like a chopped-off pyramid. Ziggurats are made of mud-bricks—the building material of choice in the Near East, as stone is rare Ziggurats were not only a visual focal point of the city, they were a symbolic one, as well—they were at the heart of the theocratic political system (a theocracy is a type of government where a god is recognized as the ruler, and the state officials operate on the god’s behalf). So, seeing the ziggurat towering above the city, one made a visual connection to the god or goddess honored there, but also recognized that deity's political authority Excavators of the White Temple estimate that it would have taken 1500 laborers working on average ten hours per day for about five years to build the last major revetment (stone facing) of its massive underlying terrace (the open areas surrounding the White Temple at the top of the ziggurat) o Proabably some sort of forced labor involved The sides of the ziggurat were very broad and sloping but broken up by recessed stripes or bands from top to bottom (see digital reconstruction, above), which would have made a stunning pattern in morning or afternoon sunlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and the Pyramids of Giza Known As “The Age of the Pyramids,” the Old Kingdom Was Characterized by Revolutionary
    Architecture and the Pyramids of Giza Known as “the Age of the Pyramids,” the Old Kingdom was characterized by revolutionary advancements in architecture. Figure 1: The Pyramids of Giza This view shows all three pyramid structures: the Great Pyramid, the Pyramid of Khafre, and the Pyramid of Menkaure. The Old Kingdom (2686 BC - 2182 BC) was a period of political stability and economic prosperity, during which great tombs were built for Egyptian Kings in the form of pyramids. The first king to launch a major pyramid building project was King Djoser, who built his famous “Step Pyramid” at Saqqara. The Pyramids of Giza are the greatest architectural achievement of the time, and include three pyramid structures and the Great Sphinx monument. It would have taken several thousand workers decades to complete just one pyramid. While we know that the stone for the pyramids was quarried, transported and cut from the nearby Nile, we still cannot be sure just how the massive stones were then put into place. While stone was generally reserved for tombs and temples, sun-baked mud bricks were used in the construction of Egyptian houses, palaces, fortresses, and town walls. Note: Limestone is an abundant rock of marine and freshwater sediments, primarily composed of calcite (CaCO₃). It occurs in a variety of forms, both crystalline and amorphous. To quarry means to obtain (mine) stone from an excavation pit, usually by blasting, cutting, or digging. A quarry is a site for mining stone, limestone or slate. A sphinx was a creature with the head of a human and the body of an animal (commonly a lion).
    [Show full text]
  • The Debates on the Perception of the Ancient Egyptian Civilization
    International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies Volume 4, Issue 12, 2017, PP 11-21 ISSN 2394-6288 (Print) & ISSN 2394-6296 (Online) The Debates on the Perception of the Ancient Egyptian Civilization Dr. Jock Matthew Agai School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg *Corresponding Author: Dr. Jock Matthew Agai, School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. ABSTRACT There is a tradition according to which the ancient Egyptians were the most civilized people that ever lived. This researcher contests this tradition and argue that the Semitic Peoples and the archaeological findings in Egypt are primary in developing the construct according to which human civilization started from Egypt. The purpose of this research is to firstly shed light on the reasons that led to the development of the tradition of the ancient Egyptian civilization, and secondly, to highlight the implications of the perception of the ancient Egyptian civilization on other Africans. Keywords: Archaeological Discoveries, Artefacts, Civilization, Construct, Culture, Theories, Perception 3 THE CONCEPT OF CIVILIZATION racialization of the concepts of civilization. Professor Philippe Denis is a senior lecturer in Botz-Bornstein have presented a theory according the history of Christianity at the School of to which the French people and the Germans Religion, Philosophy and Classics, University of originated the concept of civilization (Botz- Kwa-Zulu Natal. Denis believed that the ancient Bornstein 2012:10). Another school of thought Egyptians were not civilized as it has been emphasizes that the beginning of writing is speculated. He thought that the conceptualization equivalent to the beginning of human of the civilization of the ancient Egyptians was a civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylon and Sumer 5000 B.C. Peak 626 B.C 5600 Years. Abandoned at 600A.D
    Babylon and Sumer 5000 B.C. Peak 626 B.C 5600 years. Abandoned at 600A.D. By, Mark Baxter and Chase Barden Geographic impact on society ● The Tigris and Euphrates river valleys gave birth to Ancient Mesopotamia ● Sumer and Babylon were both born to Mesopotamia ● Babylon is present day baghdad ● Babylon is surrounded by civilizations and has the persian gulf to the south Political System and Impact On Society ● Babylon and sumer had multiple kings making it a dictatorship ● An advanced culture was well established in southern Mesopotamia ● Long before the time of the earliest surviving written records (ca. 3300 B.C.). ● Probably originally governed by citizen assemblies rather than kings. ● We do not know for sure because there are no records of government Economic System ● Only the finest goods in Sumer were traded ● Freemen and slaves were the 2 social classes ● Value of land based on proximity of water ● Rare supplies are considered very valuable ● Examples are lumber, stone, gold, silver, and precious jewels Beliefs and Religious impact on culture ● Each city was home to a cult dedicated to a god ● There was multiple Gods throughout Sumer ● Sumerians were monotheistic ● ENLIL was the god of plenty and harsh justice ● Enki was the God of wisdom and sea ● An was the god of the sky Rise of civilization Sumer is believed to be made up of people who migrated from mesopotamia, and civilizations were established along the banks of the euphrates and tigris rivers. URUK in sumer is believed to be the world's first city. These cities grew and soon by 3000 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Masterpiece of a Demigod Modern Architecture Carried Back Fifty Centuries by This Amazing Discovery by Dr
    April THE 11 Independent 1925 The Masterpiece of a Demigod Modern Architecture Carried Back Fifty Centuries by this Amazing Discovery By Dr. George A.Reisner Head of the Boston-Harvard Expedition Inventing Crime by Statute By Prof. Fred E. Haynes Spring Book Number Reviews of the Season’s "Books VOLUME114 NUMBER3906 Five Dollars a Year Fifteen Cents a Copy 400 THE INDEPENDENT Vol. 114,No. 3906 The Masterpiece of a Demigod The Story of the Recent Amazing Discovery of the First Stone Building in the World By Dr. George A. Reisner a result of the IV, Philopater, and at discovery of the Dr. Reisner, the foremost Egyptologist in Medinet Habu with Ptolemy funerary temple America today, and chief of the Harvard Univer- emy IX, Euergetes 11. ofAs King Zoser of Dynasty sity-Boston Museum Expedition which recently Priests of the god Imhotep ‘reported the important discovery of an intact hotep are known, and a III who reigned as king tomb of the Fourth Dynasty, has received the in Upper and Lower cabled permission of the Egyptian Government to number of bronze figures Egypt about 3100 B.c., tell the amazing tale unfolded here-the story which were probably votive every book on Egyptian of the,first stone building in the world, the Temple tive offerings to him. architecture and art is of Zoser, and of that mysterious Imhotep, now Every scribe when preparing identified for the first time as the temple’s creative rendered obsolete and genius. The story coming from the excavations paring to write poured will have to be rewritfen.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Analysis of Earth Construction's Vaults: Case of Underground Tombs of Chogha Zanbil
    Structural analysis of earth construction’s vaults: Case of underground tombs of Chogha Zanbil Sara Hosseini (Main Author) Department of Conservation and Restoration, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch Imam Hassan Ave., Pounak, Tehran (Iran) [email protected] http://rcid.org/0000-0001-6493-1101 Hamed Niroumand (Corresponding Author) Department of Civil Engineering, Buein Zahra Technical University Buein Zahra, Qazvin (Iran) Quantitative Archaeology Laboratory, University at Autonoma Barcelona Campus de la UAB, Plaça Cívica, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain) [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-9581 Arzuhan Burcu Gültekin Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University Yenimahalle, Ankara (Turkey) [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1246-6468 Juan Antonio Barceló Quantitative Archaeology Laboratory, University at Autonoma Barcelona Campus de la UAB, Plaça Cívica, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain) [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-471X Atasya Osmadi Construction Management Programme, School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM Penang, Penang (Malaysia) [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4587-6642 Fatemeh Mahdavi Department of Conservation and Restoration, Tehran University of Art Valiasr St, Tehran (Iran) [email protected] http://rcid.org/0000-0003-4041-2491 Manuscript Code: 13920 Date of Acceptance/Reception: 30.11.2020/14.05.2020 DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.19.3.366 Abstract The 3300-year-old Chogha Zanbil is the largest and best-preserved five levelled pyramidal earth ziggurat outside Mesopotamia, which was inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List. Underground tombs of Chogha Zanbil are accepted as outstanding instances in Iran and consist of vaults, which are built with special methods by Elamite architects.
    [Show full text]
  • River Valley Civilizations: Mesopotamia (3500 BCE-1600 BCE)
    FCPS World I SOL Standards: WHI 3a, 3b, 3c and 3e River Valley Civilizations: Mesopotamia (3500 B.C.E.-1600 B.C.E.) You Mean the Wheel Was Invented in the Middle East? Geography of the Fertile Crescent Mesopotamia is a Greek word that means “land between two rivers.” The Tigris is the river which sits on “top” and Euphrates which is “under.” Mesopotamia is located in a region called the Fertile Crescent because of the land’s curved shape consisting of rich soil. This region is located between the Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean Sea in Southwest Asia. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers flooded Mesopotamia at least once a year leaving behind a fertile mud called silt. Farmers planted crops in the rich soil and used these rivers for irrigation. Early civilizations developed in river valleys because the rivers helped with trade, gave these early city- Map of Mesopotamia states protection, and provided fertile soil. Source: http://www.marshallcavendishdigital.com/articledisplay/17/4505/46435/#img_11691 The Sumerians (3000 B.C.E.) Sumer is believed to be one of the first civilizations located in Mesopotamia. The Sumerians built many cities that shared the same culture yet they had their own government with their own rulers. This began the development of a city-state. At the center of every Sumerian city was a walled temple called a ziggurat. Religion played an important role in Sumer and the Sumerians believed in many gods. The belief in more than one god is called polytheism. Early Sumerian governments were controlled by temple priests but after 2500 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ziggurat Model
    The Ziggurat Model Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, M.A., CCC-SLP Coordinator of Autism Services Arlington Public Schools Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, MA, CCC-SLP What is a ziggurat? A multi-storied temple tower from ancient Mesopotamia built by the Sumerians, Babylonians and Assyrians for local religions The word ziggurat is Akkadian for “to build on a raised area” Image from http://aristasia.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/ziggurat.jpg Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, MA, CCC-SLP What is the Ziggurat Model? Provides a process and framework for designing individualized, comprehensive intervention plans for individuals with ASD of all ages (Aspy & Grossman, 2008) Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, MA, CCC-SLP Why use the Ziggurat Model? Researched-based program Developed to address the true needs and underlying deficits that result in social, emotional, and behavior concerns Gives educators and parents a better background of the student Provides a framework for support Creates a spreadsheet in which progress can be monitored. Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, MA, CCC-SLP Additional Strengths of the Ziggurat Model Designed to simplify a complex process Incorporates and compatible with recent trends in special education law (NCLB, RTI and PBIS) Can be used alone of in combination with another model – the Comprehensive Autism Planning System (CAPS; Henry & Myles, 2007) Evidence-based interventions on each of the 5 levels ABC-I tool incorporates an FBA that facilitates development of individualized intervention Pro-active, positive approach through use of reinforcement and antecedent-based interventions. (Aspy & Grossman, 2008) Lauren Kravetz Bonnet, MA, CCC-SLP Additional Strengths of the Ziggurat Model Ongoing process allows for changes to the intervention plan at each level based on progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Topography and Dynastic History in the Age of the Pyramids
    Astronomy, topography and dynastic history in the Age of the Pyramids. Giulio Magli Faculty of Civil Architecture - Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy It is known since the 19 century that in the layout of the pyramid field of the pharaohs of the 4 th Egyptian dynasty at Giza, a “main axis” exists. Indeed, the south-east corners of these monuments align towards the site of the temple of Heliopolis, which was plainly visible in ancient times. It was later discovered that a similar situation occurs in the main pyramid field of the subsequent dynasty at Abu Sir. Here, the north-west corners of three chronologically successive pyramids again voluntarily align towards Heliopolis. However, the temple was in this case not visible, due to the rock outcrop- today occupied by the Cairo citadel - which blocks the view. In the present paper, a multi-disciplinary approach based on historical, topographical and archaeoastronomical analysis is developed in an attempt at understanding this peculiar feature, which governed from the very beginning the planning of such wonderful monuments. A general pattern actually arises, which appears to have inspired the choice of the sites and the disposition on the ground of almost all the funerary complexes of the kings during the Old Kingdom. 1. Introduction An interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of Giza and Abu Sir: the presence of a “main axis” directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile. These axes are connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaoh which probably started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid.
    [Show full text]