Towarri National Park, Wingen Maid Nature Reserve and Cedar Brush Nature Reserve

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towarri National Park, Wingen Maid Nature Reserve and Cedar Brush Nature Reserve TOWARRI NATIONAL PARK, WINGEN MAID NATURE RESERVE AND CEDAR BRUSH NATURE RESERVE PLAN OF MANAGEMENT NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Part of the Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) July 2004 This plan of management was adopted by the Minister for the Environment on 20 July 2004. Acknowledgments This plan of management is based on a draft plan prepared by staff of the Hunter Region of NPWS. Rachel-Ann Robertson was the principal author with Stephen Wright contributing much information. Graeme McGregor, Alison Ramsay, Dave Brown, Ken England, Sandro Condurso and Mel Schroder provided information and comments. Members of the public were a valuable source of information. Input and assistance from the Towarri Plan of Management Steering Committee, Hunter Regional Advisory Committee and the Planning Subcommittee of the National Parks Advisory Council is also acknowledged. Cover photograph of the Liverpool Range from Heavens Ridge in Towarri National Park by Graeme McGregor, NPWS. © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) 2004: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment ISBN 1 74122 011 4 FOREWORD Towarri National Park, Wingen Maid and Cedar Brush Nature Reserves are located approximately 25 kilometres north of Scone and 160 kilometres north-west from Newcastle, in the Upper Hunter Valley. The national park and nature reserves contain part of the Liverpool Range and are located at the junction of three biogeographical areas: the NSW North Coast, Brigalow Belt and Sydney Basin. The Liverpool Range provides part of an important east-west corridor linking the Great Dividing Range and Warrumbungle Ranges and supports a significant number of threatened and endemic plant and animal species as well as other species that reach their northern, western or southern distribution limit. The national park and nature reserves also contain sites of Aboriginal and European cultural heritage and high quality scenic landscapes. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 requires that a plan of management be prepared for each national park and nature reserve. A plan of management is a legal document that outlines how a park or reserve will be managed in the years ahead. A draft plan of management for Towarri National Park and Wingen Maid and Cedar Brush Nature Reserves was placed on public exhibition 29th November 2002 until 10th March 2003. The exhibition of the plan of management attracted 20 submissions which raised 12 issues. All submissions received were carefully considered before adopting this plan of management. This plan of management provides for the conservation of natural and cultural heritage values while providing opportunities for sustainable public use. Strategies and programs to protect, and where necessary restore, the natural and cultural values of the area will be implemented. In addition, provision will be made for picnicking and camping near the Washpools, an additional area for group camping and for short and longer bushwalks including along the Liverpool Range. This plan of management establishes the scheme of operations for Towarri National Park, Wingen Maid Nature Reserve and Cedar Brush Nature Reserve. In accordance with sections 75 and 76 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, this plan of management is hereby adopted. BOB DEBUS Minister for the Environment CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 LOCATION, GAZETTAL AND REGIONAL SETTING ...................................... 1 1.2 LANDSCAPE CONTEXT.................................................................................. 2 1.3 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................... 2 2. MANAGEMENT CONTEXT.................................................................................... 4 2.1 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................... 4 2.2 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES......................................................................... 4 3. MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS............................................................................... 5 4. CONSERVATION OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE............................ 7 4.1 GEOLOGY AND LANDFORM .......................................................................... 7 4.2 NATIVE PLANTS.............................................................................................. 8 4.3 NATIVE ANIMALS.......................................................................................... 11 4.4 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE .............................................................................. 13 4.5 HISTORIC HERITAGE ................................................................................... 14 5. PARK PROTECTION ........................................................................................... 16 5.1 SOIL EROSION.............................................................................................. 16 5.2 WATER QUALITY .......................................................................................... 16 5.3 INTRODUCED SPECIES ............................................................................... 17 5.4 FIRE MANAGEMENT..................................................................................... 21 6. VISITOR OPPORTUNITIES AND EDUCATION .................................................. 24 6.1 VISITOR INFORMATION ............................................................................... 24 6.2 RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES.................................................................. 25 (a) Public vehicular access.............................................................................. 27 (b) Horse riding ............................................................................................... 28 (c) Day use and camping ................................................................................ 28 (d) Bushwalking and walking tracks ................................................................ 30 (e) Cycling ....................................................................................................... 30 (f) Rock climbing and abseiling ....................................................................... 31 6.3 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES........................................................................... 31 7. RESEARCH AND MONITORING......................................................................... 33 8. OTHER USES ...................................................................................................... 34 9. MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS............................................... 35 10. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................. 37 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 41 PLANNING AREA MAP 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 LOCATION, GAZETTAL AND REGIONAL SETTING Towarri National Park, Wingen Maid and Cedar Brush Nature Reserves are located approximately 25 kilometres north of Scone and 160 km north-west from Newcastle, in the Upper Hunter Valley (see the map). In addition to the park and reserves, there are a number of recent acquisitions that have not yet been gazetted as either national park or nature reserve (see the map). Collectively the park, reserves and recent acquisitions are referred to as “the planning area. The planning area totals 6,627 hectares and includes part of the Liverpool Range that constitutes the Great Dividing Range in this area. The planning area separates the Hunter Valley and the Liverpool Plains and forms the watershed between the Hunter and Namoi catchments. The planning area experiences a rainfall of up to 900 mm on southern slopes and snow falls in the sub- alpine areas every 2-3 years in winter and occasionally in spring and autumn. Towarri National Park was gazetted in 1998 following the purchase of several key properties that were combined with Vacant Crown Land. The park covers an area of 5,035 hectares fragmented into six separate parcels, being the Washpools Range, Glen Range, Castle Rock, Central, Stringybark Top and Fern Top (see the map). At the time of writing acquisitions were still being added to Towarri National Park. Wingen Maid Nature Reserve is one kilometre to the east of Towarri National Park. Part of Wingen Maid Nature Reserve was under Crown lease for 7 years from 1922 and remained as Vacant Crown Land until the first 718 hectares were gazetted as a nature reserve in 1974. Further lots of crown and freehold land were added in 1981, bringing the total area to 1,095 hectares. Wingen Maid was originally conserved because it is a prominent scenic landmark in the Upper Hunter Valley and contains an interesting mix of vegetation communities. Cedar Brush Nature Reserve was gazetted in April 1977 as part of the Government’s Rainforest Conservation Policy and is located 200 metres to the west of the central portion of Towarri (see the map). The reserve totals 206 hectares and protects one of the most complex western extents of rainforest on the Liverpool Range. The planning area is located in the Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Scone and Murrurundi. The main industries in the area include viticulture, quarrying, dairying, cropping, and grazing of sheep, cattle and goats. Tourist attractions in both LGAs include wineries, bed and breakfasts and horse studs (Scone is known as the ‘Horse Capital of Australia’). Surrounding
Recommended publications
  • Kooragang Wetlands: Retrospective of an Integrated Ecological Restoration Project in the Hunter River Estuary
    KOORAGANG WETLANDS: RETROSPECTIVE OF AN INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN THE HUNTER RIVER ESTUARY P Svoboda Hunter Local Land Services, Paterson NSW Introduction: At first glance, the Hunter River estuary near Newcastle NSW is a land of contradictions. It is home to one of the world’s largest coal ports and a large industrial complex as well as being the location of a large internationally significant wetland. The remarkable natural productivity of the Hunter estuary at the time of European settlement is well documented. Also well documented are the degradation and loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat in the estuary due to over 200 years of draining, filling, dredging and clearing (Williams et al., 2000). However, in spite of extensive modification, natural systems of the estuary retained enough value and function for large areas to be transformed by restoration activities that aimed to show industry and environmental conservation could work together to their mutual benefit. By establishing partnerships and taking a collaborative and adaptive approach, the project was able to implement restoration and related activities on a landscape basis, working across land ownership and management boundaries (Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project, 2010). The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) was launched in 1993 to help compensate for the loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat at suitable sites in the Hunter estuary. This paper revisits the expectations and planning for the project as presented in a paper to the INTECOL’s V international wetlands conference in 1996 (Svoboda and Copeland, 1998), reviews the project’s activities, describes outcomes and summarises issues faced and lessons learnt during 24 years of implementing a large, long-term, integrated, adaptive and community-assisted ecological restoration project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013
    Director Assessment Policy, Systems & Stakeholder Engagement Department of Planning and Infrastructure Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley This page was intentionally left blank 2 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley Foreword Closing the loop on CSG Mining in the Hunter Valley When it comes to coal seam gas (CSG) mining, protecting Australia’s most visited wine tourism region in its entirety - not in parts - is of paramount importance. And the time to do it is now. The NSW State Government should be recognised for delivering on its pre-election promises to preserve the Hunter Valley wine tourism region from CSG mining by confirming exclusion zones around the villages of Broke and Bulga as well as around significant areas defined as Viticulture Critical Industry Clusters (VCIC). But protecting most of the region, while leaving several critical areas open for CSG exploration and mining, could have devastating consequences for the iconic Hunter region as a whole – and undo the Government’s efforts thus far. While mining is obviously a legitimate land use and an important revenue source, this can’t justify allowing mining activities in areas where other existing, profitable industries would be adversely affected. Put simply, winemaking, tourism and CSG mining are not compatible land uses. The popularity and reputation of the Hunter Valley wine tourism region is fundamentally connected to the area’s natural beauty and landscape – and that natural beauty will fast disappear if the countryside is peppered with unsightly gas wells. Research reveals 80%1 of Hunter Valley visitors don’t want to see gas wells in the wine and tourism region, with 70%2 saying if gas wells are established they’ll just stop coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Interim Report: Food Production in Australia
    Chapter 2 Issues 2.1 This chapter discusses a number of concerns raised in relation to proposed coal and gas exploration and mining/drilling on the Liverpool Plains area of NSW, in particular by BHP Billiton Ltd (BHP), Shenhua Watermark Coal Pty Ltd (Shenhua) and Santos Ltd (Santos). Particular concerns were raised at the potential for these developments to adversely impact on agricultural activities in the area. Background 2.2 The Liverpool Plains covers an area of 12 000 square kilometres located in the north-west of New South Wales some 400 kilometres from Sydney. It is bounded by the Great Dividing Range to the east, the Liverpool Range to the south and the Warrumbungles to the west. The area is a sedimentary flood plain that has been laid down over several million years to provide a very rich, fertile farming area.1 Importance of the Liverpool Plains to food production 2.3 The area's fertile black soils have a high water holding capacity with reliable summer and winter rainfall. The crops in the area consistently produce 40 per cent above the national average. The area grows a diverse range of crops such as wheat, sorghum, oats, soybeans, barley, corn, sunflowers and cotton. It also produces chickpeas, mungbeans, canola, olives, turkeys, chickens, pigs, lambs and wool. In addition it has a significant beef industry. The area is unique in that it produces two crops per year, unlike the majority of farming areas. The Liverpool Plains contributes an estimated $332 million to GDP annually.2 2.4 The area produces 28 per cent of the state's sorghum, 33 per cent of sunflowers and 16 per cent of the state's maize.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish River Water Supply Scheme
    Nomination of FISH RIVER WATER SUPPLY SCHEME as a National Engineering Landmark Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Nomination Form 4 Owner's Agreement 5 3. Location Map 6 4. Glossary, Abbreviations and Units 8 5. Heritage Assessment 10 5.1 Basic Data 10 5.2 Heritage Significance 11 5.2.1 Historic phase 11 5.2.2 Historic individuals and association 36 5.2.3 Creative or technical achievement 37 5.2.4 Research potential – teaching and understanding 38 5.2.5 Social or cultural 40 5.2.6 Rarity 41 5.2.7 Representativeness 41 6. Statement of Significance 42 7. Proposed Citation 43 8. References 44 9. CD-ROM of this document plus images obtained to date - 1 - - 2 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Fish River Water Supply Scheme [FRWS] is a medium size but important water supply with the headwaters in the Central Highlands of NSW, west of the Great Dividing Range and to the south of Oberon. It supplies water in an area from Oberon, north to Portland, Mount Piper Power Station and beyond, and east, across the Great Dividing Range, to Wallerawang town, Wallerawang Power Station, Lithgow and the Upper Blue Mountains. It is the source of water for many small to medium communities, including Rydal, Lidsdale, Cullen Bullen, Glen Davis and Marrangaroo, as well as many rural properties through which its pipelines pass. It was established by Act of Parliament in 1945 as a Trading Undertaking of the NSW State Government. The FRWS had its origins as a result of the chronic water supply problems of the towns of Lithgow, Wallerawang, Portland and Oberon from as early as 1937, which were exacerbated by the 1940-43 drought.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock, Land Cover, and Environmental History: The
    Livestock,Land Cover, and Environmental History: The Tablelandsof New SouthWales, Australia, 1820-1920 KarlW Butzer*and David M. Helgren** *DepartmentofGeography and the Environment, University ofTexas at Austin **DepartmentofGeography, SanJose State University Forsoutheastern Australia, arrival of the First Fleet in 1788raises similar issues in environmental history as the 1492landing of Columbus in the Americas. But Anglo-Australian settlement isyounger and better documented, bothin termsof scientific proxy data and historical sources, which include data on stockingrates that generally werelight. Environmental concerns were voiced early, and a livelydebate continues both among professionals andthe lay public, with Australian geographers playing a major academic and applied role. This article addresses environmentaldegradation often attributed to earlypastoralism (and implicit clearance) in theTablelands of NewSouth Wales. Methods include: (1) comparisonofwell-reported travel itineraries of1817-1833 with mod- ernland cover and streamchannels; (2) criticalreviews of high-resolutionpollen profiles and theissues of Aboriginalvs. Anglo-Australian fireecology; and (3) identificationofsoil erosion and gullying both before and afterAnglo-Australian intrusion. The results indicate that (a) landcover of the Tablelands islittle changed since priorto Contact,although some species are less common, while invasive genera of legumes have modified the groundcover; (b) thecharcoal trace in pollen profiles prior to Contact supports an ecologicalimpact
    [Show full text]
  • A Growth Agenda for the Hunter Drivers of Population Growth
    A growth agenda for the Hunter Drivers of population growth A report prepared for the Hunter Joint Organisation of Councils Dr Kim Johnstone, Associate Director Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Greater Newcastle and the Hunter region ........................................................................................... 2 Drivers of population change ........................................................................................................... 3 Population growth ............................................................................................................................ 3 Age profile ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Drivers of growth .............................................................................................................................. 6 Understanding migration.................................................................................................................. 8 Internal migration ............................................................................................................................. 8 Overseas migration .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Ecological Impact of Broom (Cytisus Scoparius) At
    6 Plant Protection Quarterly VoI.9(1) 1994 Since ]986 broom has continued to spread at Barrington Tops. Seeds may be The changing ecological impact of broom (Cytisus dispersed over long distances by streams, scoparius) by animals (horses, pigs, humans) and on at Barrington Tops, New South Wales or in vehicles and machinery (Smith and Ha rl en 1991) . This has led to establish­ J. M. B. Smith, Department of Geography and Planning, University o f New ment of new individ uals and stands along England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. streams, in open, grazed places, and par­ ticularly along tracks and roads even sev­ eral kilome tres from previous infesta­ Summary tions. In recent years attempts have been The invasive European shrub broom a nd tree regene ra tion in the Polblue area made by the Forestry Commission, Na­ (CytisJls scoparills) was introduced to of Barrington Tops in 1986. Broom stands tional Parks and Wildlife Service, local the Barrington Tops plateau during the up to several hectares in area were then landholders and other land managers to 18405 and has spread particularly rap­ generally very dense and shady; the larg­ chemically or physically control such out­ id ly since 1969. In the Polblue area est shrubs at her study sites were aged by lying populations, and to keep road edges stands are now mainly over ten years old cOW1ting growth rings in basal stem discs, and o ther heavily frequented a reas dear and consist of fewer, larger and more and found to be 4-12 years old. She found of broom .
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Range Wind Farm
    Liverpool Range Wind Farm Decommissioning & Rehabilitation Plan | February 2014 Liverpool Range Wind Farm Decommissioning & Rehabilitation Plan | February 2014 Prepared By: Epuron Pty Ltd Level 11, 75 Miller Street North Sydney NSW 2060 AUSTRALIA 02 8456 7400 www.epuron.com.au © Epuron 2012 BirremaWindFarm Preliminary Environmental Assessment | July 2010 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Project Description 5 2 DECOMMISSIONING AND REHABILITATION 7 2.1 Decommissioning Commitment 7 2.2 Decommissioning Funding 7 2.3 Host Landowners and Decommissioning 8 3 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 9 3.1 Wind Farm Landowners 9 3.2 Community 9 4 PLANNED SCOPE OF WORKS 10 4.1 Wind Turbines 10 4.2 Electrical Transformers 10 4.3 Underground Electrical Cabling and Overhead Powerlines 10 4.4 Access Roads 11 4.5 Foundations 11 4.6 Hardstands and Laydown Areas 11 4.7 Operation and Maintenance Facilities 11 5 REHABILITATION MONITORING 12 6 UPDATING THE PLAN 13 Figures Figure 1-1 Site layout overview for the proposed Liverpool Range Wind Farm 1 Introduction Development of the Liverpool Range Wind Farm involves the construction, operation and decommissioning of a 288 turbine wind farm and its associated infrastructure. This plan sets out the decommissioning and rehabilitation works required at the end of the wind farms 30 year operating life and land Lease term. In December 2011 Draft NSW Planning Guidelines for Wind Farms (Guidelines) were released. Sections 1.3(f) of the Guidelines address the following decommissioning and rehabilitation requirements for wind farms at the end of their operational life; The proponent/wind farm owner rather than the “host” landowner must retain responsibility for decommissioning, and The proponent to include a Decommissioning and Rehabilitation Plan in their environmental assessment report.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001-2002 (PDF
    2001 2002 Annual report NSW national Parks & Wildlife service Published by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220 Copyright © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002 ISSN 0158-0965 Coordinator: Christine Sultana Editor: Catherine Munro Design and layout: Harley & Jones design Printed by: Agency Printing Front cover photos (from top left): Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS); Bouddi National Park (J Winter/NPWS); Banksias, Gibraltar Range National Park Copies of this report are available from the National Parks Centre, (P Green/NPWS); Launch of Backyard Buddies program (NPWS); Pacific black duck 102 George St, The Rocks, Sydney, phone 1300 361 967; or (P Green); Beyers Cottage, Hill End Historic Site (G Ashley/NPWS). NPWS Mail Order, PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220, phone: 9585 6533. Back cover photos (from left): Python tree, Gossia bidwillii (P Green); Repatriation of Aboriginal remains, La Perouse (C Bento/Australian Museum); This report can also be downloaded from the NPWS website: Rainforest, Nightcap National Park (P Green/NPWS); Northern banjo frog (J Little). www.npws.nsw.gov.au Inside front cover: Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS). Annual report 2001-2002 NPWS mission G Robertson/NPWS NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Aboriginal heritage 46 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 47 Customers, partners and stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology, Morphology, Distribution and Speciation of a New Species and Subspecies of the Genus Egernia (Lacertilia: Scincidae)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Cogger, Harold G., 1960. The ecology, morphology, distribution and speciation of a new species and subspecies of the genus Egernia (Lacertilia: Scincidae). Records of the Australian Museum 25(5): 95–105, plates 1 and 2. [1 July 1960]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.25.1960.657 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia VOL. XXV, No. 5 SYDNEY, 1st JULY, 1960 RECORDS of The Australian Museulll (World List abbreviation: Ree. Aust. l\<Ius.) Printed by order of the Trustees Edited by the Director, J. W. EVANS, Sc.D. The Ecology, Morphology, Distribution and Speciation of a New Species and Subspecies of the Genus Egernia (Lacertilia: Scincidae) By HAROLD G. COGGER Pages 95-105 Plates I and II Figs 1-3 Registered at the General Post Office, Sydney, for transmission by post as a periodical • 92265 95 THE ECOLOGY~ MORPHOLOGY~ DISTRIBUTION AND SPECIATION OF A NEW SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES OF THE GENUS EGERNIA (Lacertilia : Scincidae) By HAROLD G. COGGER, Australian Museum (Figs. 1-3) (Plates I and 2) Manuscript Received 13.10.59 SUMMARY A new scincid species (Egernia saxatilis) from the Warrumbungle Mountains, New South Wales, and a new subspecies (Egernia saxatilis intermedia) from Kanangra Walls, New South Wales, are described. Morphological variations in these forms, and in the closely allied Egernia strialata (Peters), are tabulated. Egernia saxatilis saxatilis appears to be confined to the Warrumbungle Mountains, while Egernia saxatilis intermedia is distributed throughout various parts of the eastern highlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Vkunkel Thesis
    PREDICTORS OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON IN AGRICULTURAL PASTURES VEIKKO R KUNKEL B Env Sci (Hons I) (University of New England) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physical Geography December 2017 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship Statement of Originality I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Maps throughout this book were created using ArcGIS® software by Esri. ArcGIS® and ArcMap™ are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri® software, please visit www.esri.com. …………………………… (December 2017) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisors, A/P Greg Hancock and Dr. Tony Wells, for their support, guidance, patience and assistance throughout the course of my PhD. Thank you to Chris Dever, Alisa Williamson and Matthew Braggins for their assistance in collecting field data, and thanks again to Chris Dever for laboratory support.
    [Show full text]
  • 8A28d79c563d848ff8c7
    CANISIRRA NJMWALJUNG CLU1 1111CC 1NJIWLIETTIR ITP.O. Box 160, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601 Registered by Australia Post; Publication number NBH 1859 VOLUME 25 SEPTEMBER 1988 NUMBER 9 PresidenVs Prattle As promised last month, a brief outline is provided below of all the positions up for election this month. Let us have plenty of nominations on the night. Committee work (at least for the CEC) is rarely onerous and it is a great way to ensure you get a' say in how your Club runs. If you would like any further details about individual positions please give the current office bearer a call. President Chairs the Committee and General meetings and prepares controversial copy for "President's Prattle" each month. Vice President/Treasurer Controls the Clubs accounts includihg the banking of monies received and the payment of accounts - is also responsible for the preparation of the Club's Annual Report and the preparation of all RMURL \ financial statements and their submission \ to the Club Auditor. Acts as President \ when required. Minute Secretary J1ICCT7JYQ Records discussion &t and decisions made at Committee meetings. wUL &d.d at 8 pim.. n/iàAJftt&&oit Walk Secretaru 21 ot Is responsible for \ att&e,&t&m/ ensuring a balanced and comprehensive walk programme throughout the year, ie. harries members to lead walks. Prepares copy for IT. Correspondence Secretarg Clears the mail from a P.O. Box in Civic and brings relevant correspondence to the attention of committee members and the general membership at meetings and through a regular column in IT. In some cases the correspondence secretary will undertake to reply to letters on behalf of the membership.
    [Show full text]