Staff Report and Recommendation to the Design Commission
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of the River 2006-07
State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress. -
DATE: March 26, 2008 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 08-35 South
DATE: March 26, 2008 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 08-35 South Corridor Phase II: Portland to Milwaukie Light Rail Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED None ─ information only. SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to update the Portland Development Commission (PDC) Board of Commissioners (Board) regarding the South Corridor Phase II: Portland to Milwaukie Light Rail Project. Previously, the Board received a briefing on this project in May 2007. Following today’s meeting, staff expects to return with an updated briefing in May 2008, followed by a June 2008 Board final recommendation to City Council on a preferred light rail river crossing alignment. In addition, in April, Metro and TriMet will brief the Board specifically on construction cost related items. Today’s briefing is intended to provide the Board with an understanding of the work completed to date and currently underway, and to identify any questions or concerns the Board might have at this time. BACKGROUND The South Corridor light rail connection from Portland to Milwaukie has been in Metro’s regional plan since the early 1980’s. Light rail project development started in the early 1990’s and was examined as part of the South/North Transit Corridor Project that evaluated light rail alignment options from Clackamas Town Center to Milwaukie and from Portland to Vancouver. In 1998, this effort resulted in a recommended alignment, known as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), adopted by Metro, TriMet, and local jurisdictions, including the City of Portland. The LPA was amended most recently in 2003, and the entire alignment is shown on the map on Attachment A. -
Block 33 & Block 49 PGP Between SW Bond & Moody Avenues VALUATION INC North Macadam District in Portland, Oregon
TWO COMMERCIAL PROPER'I'IES Block 33 & Block 49 PGP Between SW Bond & Moody Avenues VALUATION INC North Macadam District in Portland, Oregon Mr. Karl ~inkels~iel Associate Project Coordinator Portland Development Commission 222 NW 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97209 PREPAREDBY John D. lngle Todd S. Liebow, MA1 PGP VALUATIONINC 1 10 SW Yamhill, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97204-3024 (503) 226-0983 Portland - Seattle - Sun Diego Sacramento - Vancouver August 14,2006 PGP VALUATION INC Mr. Karl Dinkelspiel Associate Project Coordinator Portland Development Commission 222 NW 5+hAvenue Portland, OR 97209 RE: TWO COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Block 33 & Block 49 Acquisitions Between SW Bond & Moody Avenues North Macadam District in Portland, Oregon Dear Mr. Dinkelspiel: Per your request, we have appraised the two captioned properties using generally accepted appraisal principles and practices. This is a Complete Appraisal presented in a Summary report format. This type of appraisal report is intended to comply with the report requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(a) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as adopted by the Appraisal Foundation and the Appraisal Institute, Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reforms, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). This report is considered a Complete Appraisal presented in a Summary Report format. The subject of this report consists of two separate vacant properties (land only) located at the south end of the rapidly developing South Waterfront District and south of the Portland Central Business District. This district is located between the 1-5 Freeway and the Willamette River and is also referred to as North Macadam. -
Community Building Sourcebook Land Use and Transportation Initiatives in Portland, Oregon
Community Building Sourcebook Land use and transportation initiatives in Portland, Oregon December 2007 December 2007 Dear Colleague: TriMet is pleased to provide this Community Building Sourcebook, which highlights the many land use and transportation accomplishments of the Portland, Oregon, region. This document is intended to provide snapshots of the innovative projects, plans and programs that shape our region’s growth. As you will see, Portland’s successes have depended upon partnerships among neighborhoods, local municipalities, regional interests, state agencies, environmental groups, developers and private fi nancial institutions. These partnerships are key to our successes. This document was a collaborative effort among TriMet, Metro and 1000 Friends of Oregon, originally published in 1999. Now in 2007 we are proud to present a revised edition of the Community Building Sourcebook to include new projects, programs and up-to- date information. A new chapter includes two transit-oriented development tours. We hope you fi nd the information and contacts helpful in your own work. Please feel free to call any of the listed representatives for more information. Sincerely, Fred Hansen General Manager Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Acknowledgments The 1999 edition of this report was a collaborative effort among 1000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and TriMet. The following individuals helped prepare and edit the 1999 Community Building Sourcebook: GB Arrington, Rob Bennett, Amy Carlsen-Kohnstamm, Phil Harris, Michael Kiser, Kim Knox, Barbara Linssen, Carlo Markewitz, Amy Norway, Lynn Peterson, Rhonda Ringering and Darcie White. TriMet led the 2005 update of the Community Building Sourcebook. Jillian Detweiler was the project manager. Leah Wyatt and LeAnne Brown were responsible for fact-checking and creating new electronic fi les. -
Livable Portland Land Use and Transportation Initiatives
Livable Portland Land Use and Transportation Initiatives November 2010 Capital Projects 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97232 503-962-2150 trimet.org Preface At TriMet, we are proud of our contribution to the livability of the Portland region. We have seen enormous growth here since 1969 when the agency was formed. In that time, due to numerous visionary leaders and passionate citizen involvement that increases with each passing year, this region has made great strides in enhancing our sustainability, livability and economic vitality. One of the key tools in making this work has been to integrate land use and transportation planning, policy and development. TriMet’s role is to provide service across our district in ways that encourage the kind of growth this region has said it wants to accommodate in 2040. The result of this marriage of smart transportation investments—particularly transit— and land use planning is more compact, efficient cities that are easier to serve with non-automobile transportation modes. A fundamental measure of our success is whether more people can conveniently meet their needs Neil McFarlane by walking, rolling, biking or transit without adding to traffic congestion, TriMet General Manager emissions and other local, regional and global impacts. Reliable and frequent bus, light rail and streetcar service, combined with attention to bicycle and pedestrian mobility, make it possible for more and more people to choose not to drive for many or all of their daily needs. The numbers tell the story of this region’s success. Between 1997 and 2007, TriMet ridership grew faster than the region’s population, the amount of service we provide, and the number of miles that people drove.