Meiotic Prophase Abnormalities and Metaphase Cell Death in MLH1-Deficient Mouse Spermatocytes: Insights Into Regulation of Spermatogenic Progress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Developm ental Biology 249, 85–95 (2002) doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0708

Meiotic Prophase Abnorm alities and Metaphase Cell Death in MLH1-Deficient Mouse Sperm atocytes: Insights into Regulation of Sperm atogenic Progress

Shannon Eaker,1 John Cobb,2 April Pyle, and Mary Ann Handel3

Departm ent of Biochem istry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, U niversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996

The MLH1 protein is required for norm al m eiosis in m ice and its absence leads to failure in m aintenance of pairing between bivalent chrom osom es, abnorm al m eiotic division, and ensuing sterility in both sexes. In this study, we investigated whether failure to develop foci of MLH1 protein on chrom osom es in prophase would lead to elim ination of prophase sperm atocytes, and, if not, whether univalent chrom osom es could align norm ally on the m eiotic spindle and whether m etaphase sperm atocytes would be delayed and/or elim inated. In spite of the absence of MLH1 foci, no apoptosis of sperm atocytes in prophase was detected. In fact, chrom osom es of pachytene sperm atocytes from Mlh1؊/؊ m ice were com petent to condense m etaphase chrom osom es, both in vivo and in vitro. Most condensed chrom osom es were univalents with spatially distinct FISH signals. Typical m etaphase events, such as synaptonem al com plex breakdown and the phosphorylation of Ser10 on histone H3, occurred in Mlh1؊/؊ sperm atocytes, suggesting that there is no inhibition of onset of m eiotic m etaphase in the face of m assive chrom osom al abnorm alities. However, the condensed univalent chrom osom es did not align correctly onto the spindle apparatus in the m ajority of Mlh1؊/؊ sperm atocytes. Most m eiotic m etaphase sperm atocytes were characterized with bipolar spindles, but chrom osom es radiated away from the m icrotubule-organizing centers in a prom etaphase-like pattern rather than achieving a bipolar orientation. Apoptosis was not observed until after the onset of m eiotic m etaphase. Thus, sperm atocytes are not elim inated in direct response to the initial m eiotic defect, but are elim inated later. Taken together, these observations suggest that a spindle assem bly checkpoint, rather than a recom bination or chiasm ata checkpoint, m ay be activated in response to m eiotic errors, thereby ensuring elim ination of chrom osom ally abnorm al gam ete precursors. © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)

som es and recom bination between them . Recom bination results in the form ation of physical links, chiasm ata, be-

INTRODUCTION

tween hom ologous chrom osom es. These are required for proper chrom osom e alignm ent and segregation in the first m eiotic division (Carpenter, 1994; Koehler et al., 1996). Since recom bination is a prerequisite for faithful segregation of chrom osom es, it is im portant to understand not only the m olecular events of recom bination but also the consequences of error and whether error is m onitored in order to ensure gam ete quality. Meiotic recom bination is a com plex series of steps, m ediated by a large num ber of proteins that likely act together in com plexes (Cohen and Pollard, 2001; Sm ith and N icolas, 1998). The events of recom bination include DN A double-strand breaks, strand invasion, form ation of Holliday junctions and heteroduplex DN A, and processing of recom bination interm ediates by reactions that include DN A m ism atch repair. A significant
Making a genetically com plete and norm al gam ete is essential for reproduction and continuity of the species. The process of m eiosis ensures that gam etes receive a haploid, 1N , com plem ent of chrom osom es and the 1C com plem ent of DN A. The stage is set for accurate segregation of chrom osom es by the events of m eiotic prophase, principally pairing and synapsis of hom ologous chrom o-

1

Present address: Am erican Red Cross, Holland Laboratory,
Rockville, MD 20855.

2

Present address: University of Geneva, Departm ent of Zoology,
Sciences III, 30 Quai Ernest-Anserm et, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

3

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: (865) 974-
6306. E-m ail: m [email protected].

0012-1606/02 $35.00 © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA) All rights reserved.

85

86

Eaker et al.

FIG. 1. Chrom osom e pairing is defective in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes as revealed by FISH analysis of MI sperm atocytes from Mlh1ϩ/ϩ (A) and Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ (B) m ice with chrom osom e paint probes (for chrom osom es 2, green, and 8, red, with DAPI-stained chrom atin in blue). In (A), signals of the sam e color are juxtaposed in a single bivalent, indicating paired hom ologous chrom osom es in control sperm atocytes. In (B), univalent chrom osom es are identified by two separate signals per chrom osom e in m utant sperm atocytes. FIG. 2. Pachytene sperm atocytes from Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ m ice are com petent to condense chrom osom es in response to OA treatm ent in vitro. (A) Control Mlh1ϩ/ϩ sperm atocytes treated with OA for 6 h. (B) Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes treated with OA for 6 h. Condensed chrom osom es are usually univalents, assessed by chrom osom e num ber, m orphology, and absence of visible chiasm ata. (C) Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes treated with OA for 6 h, showing occasional chiasm ate bivalents (arrow).

num ber of proteins have been im plicated, directly or indirectly, in the events com prising recom bination in m am - m als (Cohen and Pollard, 2001). While m uch is already known about the m olecular processes of m eiotic recom bination, virtually nothing is known about the m echanism s in m am m alian gam etogenesis that m ight m onitor the progress of m eiosis and ensure gam ete quality. In the apparent absence of m utations affecting m am m alian m eiotic checkpoint m echanism s, evidence for such processes can be gleaned from experim ental investigation of m utants with errors in m eiotic processes. N ull or knockout m utations have been particularly useful to test possible downstream effects, perhaps checkpoint-m ediated, of failure in specific m eiotic processes. However, there is an im portant caveat: failure in progress of gam etogenesis in the absence of a specific gene product can be explained in at least two ways. It could be due either to a requirem ent for the gene product in order to progress to the subsequent step in m eiosis or to checkpoint m onitoring of a failed event and subsequent elim ination by apoptosis of germ cells that are otherwise progressing in differentiation. N onetheless, m utations or conditions interfering with the events of m eiosis can be inform ative about specific requirem ents and possibly provide indirect evidence for the existence of m eiotic checkpoint m echanism s. Here, we study the effects on m eiotic progress in sperm atogenesis of absence of the MLH1 protein. The MLH1 protein prom otes crossing over in budding yeast (Hunter and Borts, 1997), and in m ice and hum ans, the MLH1 protein localizes with m eiotic crossover sites, corresponding to the num ber and distribution of chiasm ata (Anderson et al., 1999; Barlow and Hulten, 1998). Mice that are hom ozygous for a knockout of the Mlh1 gene are sterile, exhibiting a failure either to form or to m aintain chiasm ata, revealed by presence of univalent chrom osom es at m eiotic m etaphase (Baker et al., 1996; Edelm ann et al., 1996). In m utant fem ale m ice, oocytes clearly progress to m etaphase, at which tim e they exhibit abnorm alities of chrom osom e alignm ent and spindle assem bly (Woods et al.,

© 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Regulation of Sperm atogenic Progress

87

FIG. 3. Events of the G 2/M occur in norm al tem poral order in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes. (A) Section of stage XI–XII tubule from control Mlh1ϩ/Ϫ testis, stained with antibodies for division-phase MPM-2 epitopes (red) and phosphorylated histone H3 (green), showing MI sperm atocytes with aligned chrom osom es. (B) Section of stage XI–XII tubule from testis of an Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ m ouse, stained as in Fig. 1A. N ote that diplotene sperm atocytes show “speckled” staining for phosphorylated histone H3 at the centrom eric heterochrom atin located near the nuclear envelope (arrow) and that MI sperm atocytes with heavily phosphorylated histone H3 do not have neatly aligned chrom osom es. (C) This im age of a surface-spread control MI sperm atocyte, stained with antibodies against SYCP3 (red) and phosphorylated histone H3 (green), shows typical residual SYCP3 staining at the paired m etaphase centrom eres (arrow). (D) This Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocyte, prepared as in Fig. 3C, shows that histone H3 is phosphorylated at MI, but that hom ologous centrom eres are not paired.

1999). In m utant m ale m ice, data about loss of sperm atocytes are a bit m ore am biguous, but apparently it occurs either in late m eiotic prophase (Edelm ann et al., 1996) or in the division phase (Baker et al., 1996); the difference could be due to different m utations or differing interpretation of the phenotype. We analyzed the consequences of chiasm ata failure for survival and progress of sperm atocytes, and determ ined the tim e of cell death with reference to m eiotic events. In spite of absence of MLH1 protein, sperm atocytes are not arrested and do not undergo apoptosis during the pachytene stage when MLH1 foci are first assem bled onto chrom osom es. Instead, there is an apparently norm al transition from prophase to prom etaphase, with the m ajority of sperm atocytes dying at m etaphase. Thus, if cell death is induced by a m eiotic checkpoint, the checkpoint seem ingly detects abnorm alities at the stage of spindle assem bly and chrom osom e alignm ent, well after the m anifestation of the first m eiotic abnorm ality in m utant sperm atocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

Mice carrying the Mlh1 targeted m utation were generously provided by Sean Baker (Baker et al., 1996) and offspring were genotyped by PCR reactions for the norm al and targeted alleles of

© 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

88

Eaker et al.

the Mlh1 gene from DN A obtained from tail tips. Mice were housed under 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiods at a constant tem perature (21°C), with free access to standard laboratory chow and water.

  • and
  • 8
  • (Cam bio Inc., Cam bridge, UK) were warm ed to 37°C,

denatured at 65°C, then cooled to 37°C for 1 h. A 15-␮l aliquot of each chrom osom e paint probe was added to the slides. The slides were coverslipped, sealed, and incubated overnight at 37°C in a hum idified cham ber. After two washes at 45°C for 5 m in in 50% form am ide/2ϫ SSC, followed by two washes in 0.1ϫ SSC, detection reagents from the m anufacturer (Cam bio, Inc.) were added to each slide. The slides were then processed for fluorescent visualization as described below.

Cell and Tissue Preparation

Male m ice were killed by cervical dislocation. Testes were rem oved and fixed by overnight im m ersion in cold 4% paraform aldehyde (Sigm a) at 4°C. After fixation and dehydration, testes were em bedded in paraffin and sectioned at 3 ␮m . The deparaffinized sections were m icrowaved (10 m in at power 3) to unm ask antigens before reaction with antibody. To obtain isolated germ cells, testes were detunicated, digested in 0.5 m g/m l collagenase (Sigm a) in Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) at 32°C for 20 m in, then digested in 0.5 m g/m l trypsin (Sigm a) in KRB at 32°C for 13 m in. After filtration through 80-␮M m esh and three washes in KRB, sperm atocytes were either fixed in a fibrin clot (see below) or enriched for isolation of pachytene sperm atocytes by sedim entation on a bovine serum album in (BSA) gradient at unit gravity (Bellve´, 1993). After isolation of pachytene sperm atocytes, the cells were cultured in MEM m edium /5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco/BRL). After overnight culture at 32°C with 5% CO 2, cells were treated for 6 h with 5 ␮M okadaic acid (OA) or the ethanol solvent (Cobb et al., 1999a). Chrom atin configurations were visualized by Giem sastaining of air-dried preparations of the treated cells (Evans et al., 1964; Wiltshire et al., 1995). Surface-spread chrom atin preparations for synaptonem al com plex visualization were perform ed as previously described (Cobb et al., 1999a). Briefly, germ cells were fixed in 2% paraform aldehyde and allowed to dry onto slides. The slides were fixed in 2% paraform aldehyde/0.03% SDS, then in 2% paraform aldehyde, then blocked in 10% goat serum /3% BSA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) prior to processing for im m unofluorescence.

Apoptosis Analysis

Apoptosis assays were perform ed by using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Pharm aceuticals), utilizing the end-labeling TUN EL reaction on testes fixed and sectioned as described above. The TUN EL reaction was perform ed according to the m anufacturer’s protocol, with the exception of a 15-m in incubation with the enzym e on the slides. After deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration, the slides were incubated in 80 ␮l of the reaction m ix at 37°C in a hum idified cham ber. After two 5-m in washes in PBS, the slides were processed for im m unofluorescence. To determ ine the tim ing of cell death relevant to m eiotic stage, a developm ental analysis was perform ed. Apoptosis was scored in cross-sections of sem iniferous tubules from m ice 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 days old, as well as from adults. Three control and three m utant m ice from each age were used. Tubules with m ore than three apoptotic germ cells were scored as apoptotic, consistent with previously established criteria (Kon et al., 1999); approxim ately 500 tubule crosssections per m ouse were scored.

Immunolocalization

Antisera used were polyclonal anti-SYCP3 (Eaker et al., 2001), anti-tubulin (Am ersham ), anti-phosphorylated histone H3 (Upstate Biotechnology), and anti-MPM-2 (Upstate Biotechnology). Following overnight incubation in prim ary antibody, slides were incubated with rhodam ine- or fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce), and m ounted with Prolong Antifade (Molecular Probes) containing DAPI (Molecular Probes) to stain DN A. Antibody localization was observed by using an Olym pus epifluorescence m icroscope, and im ages were captured to Adobe PhotoShop with a Ham am atsu color CCD cam era. Confocal im ages were collected by using a Leica TC SP2 laser-scanning confocal m icroscope.
To obtain a preparation enriched in m eiotically dividing sperm atocytes, a variation of the transillum ination procedure (Parvinen et al., 1993) was used (Eaker et al., 2001). Testes from adult m ice were detunicated, and then digested with 0.5 m g/m l collage-

  • nase for
  • 8
  • m in at 33°C. Tubule segm ents were excised and

transferred onto m icroscope slides in KRB. A coverslip was then placed on top of the segm ent, allowing the tubules to spread onto the slide. The entire slide was then frozen in liquid N 2 for 30 s, the coverslip was rem oved, and the slide was fixed in 3:1 ethanol/acetic acid. Prior to incubation with antibodies, the slide was blocked in PBS/10% goat serum for 30 m in. Sperm atocytes from germ cell preparations were em bedded in fibrin clots as previously described (Eaker et al., 2001). Germ cells were isolated as described above and brought to a concentration of 25 ϫ 106 cells/m l. A 3-␮l aliquot of fibrinogen (Calbiochem , 10 m g/m l fresh) and 1.5 ␮l of the cell suspension were pipetted onto a slide. Then, 2.5 ␮l of throm bin (Sigm a; 250 units) was added, and the slide was allowed to clot for 2 m in. The slide was then fixed in 4% paraform aldehyde (Sigm a) for 15 m in, washed in 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigm a) for 5 m in, then processed for im m unofluorescence. Chrom osom e painting, using fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH), was perform ed as previously described (Eaker et al., 2001). Briefly, sperm atocytes were fixed in 3:1 ethanol:acetic acid, then dropped onto slides and allowed to dry. After dehydration in an increasing ethanol series, cells were denatured by incubation in 70% form am ide/2ϫ SSC at 65°C for 2 m in, followed by another dehydration series. Chrom osom e paint probes, for chrom osom es 2

RESULTS

Chromosome Univalence and Events of the G 2/M Transition in Mlh1؊/؊ Spermatocytes

Previous findings of lack of MLH1 protein foci in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes and m eiotic chrom osom e univalence (Baker et al., 1996; Edelm ann et al., 1996) were confirm ed. Chrom osom e behavior in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes was studied by using FISH with chrom osom e-specific (Chrs. 2 and 8) paint probes on surface-spread chrom osom e preparations. This analysis was carried out on m etaphase I (MI) sperm atocytes retrieved from testes as well as on pachytene sperm atocytes induced to reach MI by treatm ent with the phosphatase inhibitor OA (Wiltshire et al., 1995), a protocol providing a

© 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Regulation of Sperm atogenic Progress

89

larger num ber of MI sperm atocytes for statistical purposes. Appropriate chrom osom e pairing, indicated by juxtaposed FISH signals, was observed for Chrs. 2 and 8 in control (Mlh1ϩ/ϩ) sperm atocytes, with 0% Ϯ 0.00 m ispairing both in vivo as well as in vitro after treatm ent with OA (Fig. 1A). Am ong Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫsperm atocytes, the m ajority (90% Ϯ 0.58) of Chrs. 2 and 8 were neither hom ologously paired nor in physical proxim ity; that is, they were separated by m ore than one FISH signal dom ain (Fig. 1B). Since surface-spread chrom osom es were scored, it is not known whether hom ologous chrom osom es could be in closer physical proxim ity in vivo. N onetheless, this analysis reveals a clear difference in proxim ity of hom ologs when m utant and control sperm atocytes were com pared. tubules from Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ m ice, this was considered to be an artifact deriving from the absence of postm eiotic stages of sperm atid differentiation. The fact that Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes go through an apparently norm al G 2/M transition is supported by observations of OA-treated sperm atocytes, where, as in controls, all sperm atocytes with condensed chrom osom es show disassem bly of the synaptonem al com - plex and phosphorylation of histone H3 throughout the chrom atin (Figs. 3C and 3D). These data show that, although univalent chrom osom es are form ed, the entry into m etaphase in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes is sim ilar to that of Mlh1ϩ/ϩ sperm atocytes, im plying that although the MLH1 protein m ay be required for chiasm ata form ation or m aintenance, chiasm ata are not part of the signal m achinery enabling either the norm al or precocious, OA-induced, G 2/M transition.
Incubation of pachytene sperm atocytes with OA is an assay that allowed assessm ent of com petence of the MLH1- deficient sperm atocytes to undergo various events of the G 2/M transition (Cobb et al., 1999a). In these analyses, characteristic processes of the G 2/M were m onitored. These included disassem bly of the axes of the synaptonem al com plex recognized by the antibody to m ouse SYCP3, condensation and individualization of chrom osom es, the phosphorylation of histone H3, a characteristic m arker of the transition into m etaphase in both m itotic and m eiotic cells (Cobb et al., 1999b), and presence of division-phase phosphorylated epitopes recognized by the MPM-2 antiserum . In both control and m utant Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes, treatm ent with OA led to chrom osom e condensation and other events of the G 2/M transition, revealing com petence of m utant sperm atocytes to undergo events of the G 2/M transition (Figs. 2 and 3). Analysis of MI chrom osom es in standard Giem sa-stained chrom osom e preparations (Fig. 2) revealed severe reduction in num ber of chiasm ata in m utant Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes (Fig. 2B), although about 25% of the sperm atocytes had one or two chiasm ate bivalents (Fig. 2C). This analysis also showed com petence of Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes to condense chrom osom es in response to OA treatm ent (Fig. 2B). In both control and m utant sperm atocytes, all stages of condensation were observed. Likewise, as previously reported (Wiltshire et al., 1995; Cobb et al., 1999a,b), not all sperm atocytes exhibit chrom osom e condensation after OA treatm ent, and interm ediate stages are seen. N onetheless, over a series of four experim ents, the frequency of Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes with condensed chrom osom es was equal to or slightly greater than the frequency am ong control sperm atocytes in the sam e experim ent. Both histone H3 phosphorylation and disassem bly of the synaptonem al com plex (SC), events consistent with m etaphase entry, were also observed in Mlh1Ϫ/Ϫ sperm atocytes (Fig. 3). These events occur in a tem porally norm al m anner in MLH1-deficient sperm atocytes (Fig. 3B), with histone H3 phosphorylation originating in the centrom eric heterochrom atin in diplotene sperm atocytes and pervasive throughout the chrom atin by MI (Figs. 3A and 3B). In both control and m utant stage XII tubule sections, robust num - bers of diplotene and MI sperm atocytes were seen. Although there appeared to be m ore such cells in stage XII

Recommended publications
  • Mitosis Vs. Meiosis

    Mitosis Vs. Meiosis

    Mitosis vs. Meiosis In order for organisms to continue growing and/or replace cells that are dead or beyond repair, cells must replicate, or make identical copies of themselves. In order to do this and maintain the proper number of chromosomes, the cells of eukaryotes must undergo mitosis to divide up their DNA. The dividing of the DNA ensures that both the “old” cell (parent cell) and the “new” cells (daughter cells) have the same genetic makeup and both will be diploid, or containing the same number of chromosomes as the parent cell. For reproduction of an organism to occur, the original parent cell will undergo Meiosis to create 4 new daughter cells with a slightly different genetic makeup in order to ensure genetic diversity when fertilization occurs. The four daughter cells will be haploid, or containing half the number of chromosomes as the parent cell. The difference between the two processes is that mitosis occurs in non-reproductive cells, or somatic cells, and meiosis occurs in the cells that participate in sexual reproduction, or germ cells. The Somatic Cell Cycle (Mitosis) The somatic cell cycle consists of 3 phases: interphase, m phase, and cytokinesis. 1. Interphase: Interphase is considered the non-dividing phase of the cell cycle. It is not a part of the actual process of mitosis, but it readies the cell for mitosis. It is made up of 3 sub-phases: • G1 Phase: In G1, the cell is growing. In most organisms, the majority of the cell’s life span is spent in G1. • S Phase: In each human somatic cell, there are 23 pairs of chromosomes; one chromosome comes from the mother and one comes from the father.
  • Cell Division- Ch 5

    Cell Division- Ch 5

    Cell Division- Mitosis and Meiosis When do cells divide? Cell size . One of most important factors affecting size of the cell is size of cell membrane . Cell must remain relatively small to survive (why?) – Cell membrane has to be big enough to take in nutrients and eliminate wastes – As cells get bigger, the volume increases faster than the surface area – Small cells have a larger surface area to volume ratio than larger cells to help with nutrient intake and waste elimination . When a cell reaches its max size, the nucleus starts cell division: called MITOSIS or MEIOSIS Mitosis . General Information – Occurs in somatic (body) cells ONLY!! – Nickname: called “normal” cell division – Produces somatic cells only . Background Info – Starts with somatic cell in DIPLOID (2n) state . Cell contains homologous chromosomes- chromosomes that control the same traits but not necessarily in the same way . 1 set from mom and 1 set from dad – Ends in diploid (2n) state as SOMATIC cells – Goes through one set of divisions – Start with 1 cell and end with 2 cells Mitosis (cont.) . Accounts for three essential life processes – Growth . Result of cell producing new cells . Develop specialized shapes/functions in a process called differentiation . Rate of cell division controlled by GH (Growth Hormone) which is produced in the pituitary gland . Ex. Nerve cell, intestinal cell, etc. – Repair . Cell regenerates at the site of injury . Ex. Skin (replaced every 28 days), blood vessels, bone Mitosis (cont.) – Reproduction . Asexual – Offspring produced by only one parent – Produce offspring that are genetically identical – MITOSIS – Ex. Bacteria, fungi, certain plants and animals .
  • List, Describe, Diagram, and Identify the Stages of Meiosis

    List, Describe, Diagram, and Identify the Stages of Meiosis

    Meiosis and Sexual Life Cycles Objective # 1 In this topic we will examine a second type of cell division used by eukaryotic List, describe, diagram, and cells: meiosis. identify the stages of meiosis. In addition, we will see how the 2 types of eukaryotic cell division, mitosis and meiosis, are involved in transmitting genetic information from one generation to the next during eukaryotic life cycles. 1 2 Objective 1 Objective 1 Overview of meiosis in a cell where 2N = 6 Only diploid cells can divide by meiosis. We will examine the stages of meiosis in DNA duplication a diploid cell where 2N = 6 during interphase Meiosis involves 2 consecutive cell divisions. Since the DNA is duplicated Meiosis II only prior to the first division, the final result is 4 haploid cells: Meiosis I 3 After meiosis I the cells are haploid. 4 Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Prophase I: ¾ Chromosomes condense. Because of replication during interphase, each chromosome consists of 2 sister chromatids joined by a centromere. ¾ Synapsis – the 2 members of each homologous pair of chromosomes line up side-by-side to form a tetrad consisting of 4 chromatids: 5 6 1 Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Prophase I: ¾ During synapsis, sometimes there is an exchange of homologous parts between non-sister chromatids. This exchange is called crossing over. 7 8 Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis (2N=6) Prophase I: ¾ the spindle apparatus begins to form. ¾ the nuclear membrane breaks down: Prophase I 9 10 Objective 1, Stages of Meiosis Objective 1, 4 Possible Metaphase I Arrangements: Metaphase I: ¾ chromosomes line up along the equatorial plate in pairs, i.e.
  • Opium Alkaloid Noscapine Is an Antitumor Agent That Arrests Metaphase and Induces Apoptosis in Dividing Cells

    Opium Alkaloid Noscapine Is an Antitumor Agent That Arrests Metaphase and Induces Apoptosis in Dividing Cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 1601–1606, February 1998 Cell Biology Opium alkaloid noscapine is an antitumor agent that arrests metaphase and induces apoptosis in dividing cells KEQIANG YE*†,YONG KE‡,NAGALAKSHMI KESHAVA§,JOHN SHANKS†,JUDITH A. KAPP‡,RAJESHWAR R. TEKMAL§, i JOHN PETROS¶, AND HARISH C. JOSHI*† *Graduate Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Departments of †Anatomy and Cell Biology, ‡Pathology, §Gynecology–Obstetrics, and ¶Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322 Edited by Thomas D. Pollard, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, and approved December 17, 1997 (received for review July 17, 1997) ABSTRACT An alkaloid from opium, noscapine, is used (2,3,4-trimethoxyphenyl)-2,4,6-cycloheptatrien-1-one], TCB as an antitussive drug and has low toxicity in humans and (2,3,4-trimethoxy-49-carbomethoxy-1,19-biphenyl), and TKB mice. We show that noscapine binds stoichiometrically to (2,3,4-trimethoxy-49-acetyl-1,19-biphenyl), and vinca alkaloids. tubulin, alters its conformation, affects microtubule assembly, Taxol and its analogs represent the compounds that promote and arrests mammalian cells in mitosis. Furthermore, the assembly of microtubules. It is now clear that although all noscapine causes apoptosis in many cell types and has potent of these microtubule drugs prevent cell division, only a select antitumor activity against solid murine lymphoid tumors few have been useful clinically. In addition, there are differ- (even when the drug was administered orally) and against ences regarding the toxicity and the efficacy of these drugs for human breast and bladder tumors implanted in nude mice.
  • Cell Life Cycle and Reproduction the Cell Cycle (Cell-Division Cycle), Is a Series of Events That Take Place in a Cell Leading to Its Division and Duplication

    Cell Life Cycle and Reproduction the Cell Cycle (Cell-Division Cycle), Is a Series of Events That Take Place in a Cell Leading to Its Division and Duplication

    Cell Life Cycle and Reproduction The cell cycle (cell-division cycle), is a series of events that take place in a cell leading to its division and duplication. The main phases of the cell cycle are interphase, nuclear division, and cytokinesis. Cell division produces two daughter cells. In cells without a nucleus (prokaryotic), the cell cycle occurs via binary fission. Interphase Gap1(G1)- Cells increase in size. The G1checkpointcontrol mechanism ensures that everything is ready for DNA synthesis. Synthesis(S)- DNA replication occurs during this phase. DNA Replication The process in which DNA makes a duplicate copy of itself. Semiconservative Replication The process in which the DNA molecule uncoils and separates into two strands. Each original strand becomes a template on which a new strand is constructed, resulting in two DNA molecules identical to the original DNA molecule. Gap 2(G2)- The cell continues to grow. The G2checkpointcontrol mechanism ensures that everything is ready to enter the M (mitosis) phase and divide. Mitotic(M) refers to the division of the nucleus. Cell growth stops at this stage and cellular energy is focused on the orderly division into daughter cells. A checkpoint in the middle of mitosis (Metaphase Checkpoint) ensures that the cell is ready to complete cell division. The final event is cytokinesis, in which the cytoplasm divides and the single parent cell splits into two daughter cells. Reproduction Cellular reproduction is a process by which cells duplicate their contents and then divide to yield multiple cells with similar, if not duplicate, contents. Mitosis Mitosis- nuclear division resulting in the production of two somatic cells having the same genetic complement (genetically identical) as the original cell.
  • Review Questions Meiosis

    Review Questions Meiosis

    Review Questions Meiosis 1. Asexual reproduction versus sexual reproduction: which is better? Asexual reproduction is much more efficient than sexual reproduction in a number of ways. An organism doesn’t have to find a mate. An organism donates 100% of its’ genetic material to its offspring (with sex, only 50% end up in the offspring). All members of a population can produce offspring, not just females, enabling asexual organisms to out-reproduce sexual rivals. 2. So why is there sex? Why are there boys? If females can reproduce easier and more efficiently asexually, then why bother with males? Sex is good for evolution because it creates genetic variety. All organisms depend on mutations for genetic variation. Sex takes these preexisting traits (created by mutations) and shuffles them into new combinations (genetic recombination). For example, if we wanted a rice plant that was fast-growing but also had a high yield, we would have to wait a long time for a fast-growing rice to undergo a mutation that would also make it highly productive. An easy way to combine these two desirable traits is through sexually reproduction. By breeding a fast-growing variety with a high-yielding variety, we can create offspring with both traits. In an asexual organism, all the offspring are genetically identical to the parent (unless there was a mutation) and genetically identically to each other. Sexual reproduction creates offspring that are genetically different from the parents and genetically different from their siblings. In a stable environment, asexual reproduction may work just fine. However, most ecosystems are dynamic places.
  • Regulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity During Mitotic Exit and Maintenance of Genome Stability by P21, P27, and P107

    Regulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity During Mitotic Exit and Maintenance of Genome Stability by P21, P27, and P107

    Regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase activity during mitotic exit and maintenance of genome stability by p21, p27, and p107 Taku Chibazakura*†, Seth G. McGrew‡§, Jonathan A. Cooper§, Hirofumi Yoshikawa*, and James M. Roberts‡§ *Deparment of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan; and ‡Howard Hughes Medical Institute and §Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98019 Communicated by Robert N. Eisenman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, February 4, 2004 (received for review October 28, 2003) To study the regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity bind to and inactivate mitotic cyclin–CDK complexes (15, 16). during mitotic exit in mammalian cells, we constructed murine cell These CKIs accumulate and persist during mid-M-to-G1 phase ͞ lines that constitutively express a stabilized mutant of cyclin A until they are phosphorylated by Sic1 Rum1-resistant G1 cyclin- (cyclin A47). Even though cyclin A47 was expressed throughout CDKs, which initiates their ubiquitin-dependent degradation at mitosis and in G1 cells, its associated CDK activity was inactivated the G1-to-S phase transition (17–19). Thus, Sic1 and Rum1 after the transition from metaphase to anaphase. Cyclin A47 constitute a switch that controls the transition from a state of low associated with both p21 and p27 during mitotic exit, implicating CDK activity to that of high CDK activity, thereby regulating these proteins in CDK inactivation. However, cyclin A47 was fully mitotic exit and S phase entry. This parallels the activity of ؊/؊ ؊/؊ inhibited during the M-to-G1 transition in p21 p27 fibro- APC-Cdh1, and indeed these two pathways constitute redundant blasts.
  • Regulation of the Cell Cycle and DNA Damage-Induced Checkpoint Activation

    Regulation of the Cell Cycle and DNA Damage-Induced Checkpoint Activation

    RnDSy-lu-2945 Regulation of the Cell Cycle and DNA Damage-Induced Checkpoint Activation IR UV IR Stalled Replication Forks/ BRCA1 Rad50 Long Stretches of ss-DNA Rad50 Mre11 BRCA1 Nbs1 Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 Mre11 RPA MDC1 γ-H2AX DNA Pol α/Primase RFC2-5 MDC1 Nbs1 53BP1 MCM2-7 53BP1 γ-H2AX Rad17 Claspin MCM10 Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 TopBP1 CDC45 G1/S Checkpoint Intra-S-Phase RFC2-5 ATM ATR TopBP1 Rad17 ATRIP ATM Checkpoint Claspin Chk2 Chk1 Chk2 Chk1 ATR Rad50 ATRIP Mre11 FANCD2 Ubiquitin MDM2 MDM2 Nbs1 CDC25A Rad50 Mre11 BRCA1 Ub-mediated Phosphatase p53 CDC25A Ubiquitin p53 FANCD2 Phosphatase Degradation Nbs1 p53 p53 CDK2 p21 p21 BRCA1 Ub-mediated SMC1 Degradation Cyclin E/A SMC1 CDK2 Slow S Phase CDC45 Progression p21 DNA Pol α/Primase Slow S Phase p21 Cyclin E Progression Maintenance of Inhibition of New CDC6 CDT1 CDC45 G1/S Arrest Origin Firing ORC MCM2-7 MCM2-7 Recovery of Stalled Replication Forks Inhibition of MCM10 MCM10 Replication Origin Firing DNA Pol α/Primase ORI CDC6 CDT1 MCM2-7 ORC S Phase Delay MCM2-7 MCM10 MCM10 ORI Geminin EGF EGF R GAB-1 CDC6 CDT1 ORC MCM2-7 PI 3-Kinase p70 S6K MCM2-7 S6 Protein Translation Pre-RC (G1) GAB-2 MCM10 GSK-3 TSC1/2 MCM10 ORI PIP2 TOR Promotes Replication CAK EGF Origin Firing Origin PIP3 Activation CDK2 EGF R Akt CDC25A PDK-1 Phosphatase Cyclin E/A SHIP CIP/KIP (p21, p27, p57) (Active) PLCγ PP2A (Active) PTEN CDC45 PIP2 CAK Unwinding RPA CDC7 CDK2 IP3 DAG (Active) Positive DBF4 α Feedback CDC25A DNA Pol /Primase Cyclin E Loop Phosphatase PKC ORC RAS CDK4/6 CDK2 (Active) Cyclin E MCM10 CDC45 RPA IP Receptor
  • Meiosis I and Meiosis II; Life Cycles

    Meiosis I and Meiosis II; Life Cycles

    Meiosis I and Meiosis II; Life Cycles Meiosis functions to reduce the number of chromosomes to one half. Each daughter cell that is produced will have one half as many chromosomes as the parent cell. Meiosis is part of the sexual process because gametes (sperm, eggs) have one half the chromosomes as diploid (2N) individuals. Phases of Meiosis There are two divisions in meiosis; the first division is meiosis I: the number of cells is doubled but the number of chromosomes is not. This results in 1/2 as many chromosomes per cell. The second division is meiosis II: this division is like mitosis; the number of chromosomes does not get reduced. The phases have the same names as those of mitosis. Meiosis I: prophase I (2N), metaphase I (2N), anaphase I (N+N), and telophase I (N+N) Meiosis II: prophase II (N+N), metaphase II (N+N), anaphase II (N+N+N+N), and telophase II (N+N+N+N) (Works Cited See) *3 Meiosis I (Works Cited See) *1 1. Prophase I Events that occur during prophase of mitosis also occur during prophase I of meiosis. The chromosomes coil up, the nuclear membrane begins to disintegrate, and the centrosomes begin moving apart. The two chromosomes may exchange fragments by a process called crossing over. When the chromosomes partially separate in late prophase, until they separate during anaphase resulting in chromosomes that are mixtures of the original two chromosomes. 2. Metaphase I Bivalents (tetrads) become aligned in the center of the cell and are attached to spindle fibers.
  • The Spindle Checkpoint

    The Spindle Checkpoint

    Cell Science at a Glance 4139 The spindle checkpoint mechanism that delays anaphase onset highlight current understanding of how until all chromosomes are correctly the spindle checkpoint is activated, how it Karen M. May and Kevin G. attached in a bipolar fashion to the delays anaphase onset, and how it is Hardwick mitotic spindle. silenced. Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, UK The core spindle checkpoint proteins are (e-mail: [email protected]) Mad1, Mad2, BubR1 (Mad3 in yeast), Activation of the checkpoint Journal of Cell Science 119, 4139-4142 Bub1, Bub3 and Mps1. The Mad and Bub During mitosis spindle microtubules Published by The Company of Biologists 2006 proteins were first identified in budding bind to complex protein structures called doi:10.1242/jcs.03165 yeast by genetic screens for mutants that kinetochores, which assemble on the failed to arrest in mitosis when the spindle centromere of each chromosome. The Every mitosis, replicated chromosomes was destroyed (Taylor et al., 2004). These Mad and Bub proteins localise to the must be accurately segregated into each proteins are conserved in all eukaryotes. outer kinetochore early in mitosis, before daughter cell. Pairs of sister chromatids Several other checkpoint components, proper attachments are established, and attach to the bipolar mitotic spindle such as Rod, Zw10 and CENP-E, have accumulate on unattached kinetochores. during prometaphase, they are aligned at since been identified in higher eukaryotes When spindle microtubules make metaphase, then sisters separate and but have no yeast orthologues (Karess, contact with the outer kinetochore are pulled to opposite poles during 2005; Mao et al., 2003).
  • Mitosis, Cytokinesis, Meiosis and Apoptosis - Michelle Gehringer

    Mitosis, Cytokinesis, Meiosis and Apoptosis - Michelle Gehringer

    FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMISTRY, CELL BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS – Vol. II - Mitosis, Cytokinesis, Meiosis and Apoptosis - Michelle Gehringer MITOSIS, CYTOKINESIS, MEIOSIS AND APOPTOSIS Michelle Gehringer Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa Keywords: Cell cycle, checkpoints, growth factors, mitosis, meiosis, cyclin, cyclin dependent protein kinases, G1 phase, S phase, spindle, prophase, anaphase, metaphase, telophase, cytokinesis, p53, apoptosis Contents 1. The eukaryote cell cycle 1.1. Phases 2. Mitosis 2.1 Prophase 2.2 Metaphase 2.3 Anaphase 2.4 Telophase 2.5 Cytokinesis 3. Meiosis 3.1. Stages of meiosis 4. Fertilization and development 5. Regulators of Cell cycle 5.1. Checkpoints 5.1.1 G1/S checkpoint 5.1.2 G2/M checkpoint 5.1.3 Mitosis checkpoint 5.2 Maturation promoting factor 5.3 Cyclin dependent protein kinases 5.3.1 Diversity and action 5.3.2 Regulation 5.3.3 Cyclin regulation of mitosis 5.4 Growth factors 5.5 Inhibitors of cell cycle progression 6. Programmed cell death 6.1. TriggersUNESCO of apoptosis – EOLSS 6.2. Pathways leading to apoptosis 7. Conclusion SAMPLE CHAPTERS Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The eukaryotic cell cycle comprises clear stages. Two major stages are the synthesis phase, where the cell replicates its genetic information, and the mitotic phase, where the cell divides into two daughter cells. They are separated by gap phases 1 and 2. These ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMISTRY, CELL BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS – Vol. II - Mitosis, Cytokinesis, Meiosis and Apoptosis - Michelle Gehringer stages prepare the cell for the following step in the cell cycle.
  • CDK Regulation of Meiosis: Lessons from S. Cerevisiae and S. Pombe

    CDK Regulation of Meiosis: Lessons from S. Cerevisiae and S. Pombe

    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review CDK Regulation of Meiosis: Lessons from S. cerevisiae and S. pombe Anne M. MacKenzie and Soni Lacefield * Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-812-856-2429 Received: 16 May 2020; Accepted: 26 June 2020; Published: 29 June 2020 Abstract: Meiotic progression requires precise orchestration, such that one round of DNA replication is followed by two meiotic divisions. The order and timing of meiotic events is controlled through the modulation of the phosphorylation state of proteins. Key components of this phospho-regulatory system include cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and its cyclin regulatory subunits. Over the past two decades, studies in budding and fission yeast have greatly informed our understanding of the role of CDK in meiotic regulation. In this review, we provide an overview of how CDK controls meiotic events in both budding and fission yeast. We discuss mechanisms of CDK regulation through post-translational modifications and changes in the levels of cyclins. Finally, we highlight the similarities and differences in CDK regulation between the two yeast species. Since CDK and many meiotic regulators are highly conserved, the findings in budding and fission yeasts have revealed conserved mechanisms of meiotic regulation among eukaryotes. Keywords: meiosis; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase; CDK; cyclin; APC/C; budding yeast; fission yeast; chromosome segregation 1. Introduction Control of the eukaryotic cell cycle occurs through the modulation of phosphorylation states of proteins that trigger specific events. At the forefront of this phospho-regulation are the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), whose oscillatory activity results in a large number of phosphorylations that change the activation state of their substrates [1,2].