VA Hurricane History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware
Upper Ceoozoic Deposits GEOLOGICAL SXJEVilY FRQfEBSIONAL lAPEE Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware By JAMES P. OWENS and CHARLES S. DENNY SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE GEOLOGIC STUDIES IN THE EMERGED COASTAL PLAIN OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1067-A Upper Tertiary deltaic and shallow-water marine deposits form the backbone of the peninsula. The oldest marine deposits of Pleistocene age reach a maximum altitude of 15 meters (50 feet) and have been dated radiometrically at about 100,000 years UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Owens, James Patrick, 1924- Upper Cenozoic deposits of the central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware. (Surface and shallow subsurface geologic studies in the emerged coastal plain of the Middle Atlantic States) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1067-A) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1067-A 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cenozoic. 2. Geology Delmarva Peninsula. I. Denny, Charles Storrow, 1911- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1067-A. QE690.093 551.7'8 77-608325 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03191-4 CONTENTS Abstract._____________________________________________________________ -
Significant Loss Report
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM Bureau and Statistical Agent W-01049 3019-01 MEMORANDUM TO: Write Your Own (WYO) Principal Coordinators and NFIP Servicing Agent FROM: WYO Clearinghouse DATE: July 18, 2001 SUBJECT: Significant Loss Report Enclosed is a listing of significant flooding events that occurred between February 1978 and October 2000. Only those events that had more than 1500 losses are included on the list. These data were compiled for WYO Companies and others to use to remind their customers of the impact of past flooding events. Please use this information in your marketing efforts as you feel it is appropriate. If you have any questions, please contact your WYO Program Coordinator. Enclosure cc: Vendors, IBHS, FIPNC, WYO Standards Committee, WYO Marketing Committee, ARCHIVEDGovernment Technical Representative APRIL 2018 Suggested Routing: Claims, Marketing, Underwriting 7700 HUBBLE DRIVE • LANHAM, MD 20706 • (301) 731-5300 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, under contract to the FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, is the Bureau and Statistical Agent for the National Flood Insurance Program NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM SIGNIFICANT FLOOD EVENTS REPORT EVENT YEAR # PD LOSSES AMOUNT PD ($) AVG PD LOSS Massachusetts Flood Feb. 1978 Feb-78 2,195 $20,081,479 $9,149 Louisiana Flood May 1978 May-78 7,284 $43,288,709 $5,943 WV, IN, KY, OH Floods Dec 1978 Dec-78 1,879 $11,934,512 $6,352 PA, CT, MA, NJ, NY, RI Floods Jan-79 8,826 $31,487,015 $3,568 Texas Flood April 1979 Apr-79 1,897 $19,817,668 $10,447 Florida Flood April 1979 Apr-79 -
2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER AND DEEP CREEK LAKE .................. 4 I. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ........................................................... 9 III. The Youghiogheny River/Deep Creek Lake Audit, May 16, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned............................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO: COASTAL BAYS ............................................................................. 15 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 15 II. Active Enforcement Efforts and Pending Matters ............................................. 17 III. The Coastal Bays Audit, July 12, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned .. 20 CHAPTER THREE: WYE RIVER ................................................................................. 24 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 24 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ......................................................... 26 III. The Wye River Audit, October 10, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned 27 CHAPTER FOUR: POTOMAC RIVER NORTH BRANCH AND SAVAGE RIVER 31 I. Background ....................................................................................................... -
Richmond Region
SCANDINAVIA Home to more More than Fortune 500 than 60,000 200 foreign company businesses affiliated firms 8 headquarters More than 1,700 More than 70 international More than 20 international students from international clubs and over 115 festivals each year organizations countries Richmond Region, USA A proven location for international business BUSINESS CLUSTERS The Richmond Region is home to more than 60,000 businesses, with everything from Fortune 1000 companies to two-person startups. Our strongest business clusters include: Corporate Information Finance & Advanced Food & BioScience Supply Chain Services Technology Insurance Manufacturing Beverage SCANDINAVIAN OWNED FIRMS IN RICHMOND More than 200 foreign affiliated firms have 210+ facilities in the Richmond Region representing nearly 30 countries. These firms employ over 19,000 workers and provide a wide range of products and services. There are six Scandinavian companies in the region: Alfa Laval AB (Sweden) Plate heat exchanger & high purity pump & valve production Kone Corporation (Finland) Elevator and escalator service and manufacturing MarkBric AB (Sweden) Portable displays; size marking indicators, labels, rack dividers Scandinavian Tobacco Group (Denmark) Manufacturing and distribution of premium cigars Securitas AB (Sweden) Security and related services Swedish Match AB (Sweden) Chewing and smoking tobacco TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE n Richmond is strategically located at the mid-point of the East Coast, less than 160 km (100 mi) from Washington, D.C. 1 Hanover n Three interstate highways converge in the region. 95 n More than 45% of the nation’s consumers are within a one-day drive R R of Richmond. Hanover 301 Airport n Two of the nation’s largest operators, CSX and Norfolk Southern, 64 provide rail freight service and AMTRAK provides passenger rail 295 service. -
Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay C
Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay C. S. Hardaway, Jr. and R. J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary 1 Cover Photo: Drummond Field, Installed 1985, James River, James City County, Virginia. This publication is available for $10.00 from: Sea Grant Communications Virginia Institute of Marine Science P. O. Box 1346 Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 356 Virginia Sea Grant Publication VSG-99-11 October 1999 Funding and support for this report were provided by... Virginia Institute of Marine Science Virginia Sea Grant College Program Sea Grant Contract # NA56RG0141 Virginia Coastal Resource Management Program NA470Z0287 WILLIAM& MARY Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay By C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. and Robert J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1999 4 Table of Contents Preface......................................................................................7 Shoreline Evolution ................................................................8 Shoreline Processes ..............................................................16 Wave Climate .......................................................................16 Shoreline Erosion .................................................................20 Reach Assessment ................................................................23 Shoreline Management Strategies ......................................24 Bulkheads and Seawalls -
PRC.15.1.1 a Publication of AXA XL Risk Consulting
Property Risk Consulting Guidelines PRC.15.1.1 A Publication of AXA XL Risk Consulting WINDSTORMS INTRODUCTION A variety of windstorms occur throughout the world on a frequent basis. Although most winds are related to exchanges of energy (heat) between different air masses, there are a number of weather mechanisms that are involved in wind generation. These depend on latitude, altitude, topography and other factors. The different mechanisms produce windstorms with various characteristics. Some affect wide geographical areas, while others are local in nature. Some storms produce cooling effects, whereas others rapidly increase the ambient temperatures in affected areas. Tropical cyclones born over the oceans, tornadoes in the mid-west and the Santa Ana winds of Southern California are examples of widely different windstorms. The following is a short description of some of the more prevalent wind phenomena. A glossary of terms associated with windstorms is provided in PRC.15.1.1.A. The Beaufort Wind Scale, the Saffir/Simpson Hurricane Scale, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology Cyclone Severity Scale and the Fugita Tornado Scale are also provided in PRC.15.1.1.A. Types Of Windstorms Local Windstorms A variety of wind conditions are brought about by local factors, some of which can generate relatively high wind conditions. While they do not have the extreme high winds of tropical cyclones and tornadoes, they can cause considerable property damage. Many of these local conditions tend to be seasonal. Cold weather storms along the East coast are known as Nor’easters or Northeasters. While their winds are usually less than hurricane velocity, they may create as much or more damage. -
CAPE HENRY MEMORIAL VIRGINIA the Settlers Reached Jamestown
CAPE HENRY MEMORIAL VIRGINIA the settlers reached Jamestown. In the interim, Captain Newport remained in charge. The colonists who established Jamestown On April 27 a second party was put ashore. They spent some time "recreating themselves" made their first landing in Virginia and pushed hard on assembling a small boat— a "shallop"—to aid in exploration. The men made short marches in the vicinity of the cape and at Cape Henry on April 26, 1607 enjoyed some oysters found roasting over an Indian campfire. The next day the "shallop" was launched, and The memorial cross, erected in 1935. exploration in the lower reaches of the Chesa peake Bay followed immediately. The colonists At Cape Henry, Englishmen staged Scene scouted by land also, and reported: "We past Approaching Chesapeake Bay from the south through excellent ground full of Flowers of divers I, Act I of their successful drama of east, the Virginia Company expedition made kinds and colours, and as goodly trees as I have conquering the American wilderness. their landfall at Cape Henry, the southernmost seene, as Cedar, Cipresse, and other kinds . Here, "about foure a clocke in the morning" promontory of that body of water. Capt. fine and beautiful Strawberries, foure time Christopher Newport, in command of the fleet, bigger and better than ours in England." on April 26,1607, some 105 sea-weary brought his ships to anchor in protected waters colonists "descried the Land of Virginia." just inside the bay. He and Edward Maria On April 29 the colonists, possibly using Wingfield (destined to be the first president of English oak already fashioned for the purpose, They had left England late in 1606 and the colony), Bartholomew Gosnold, and "30 others" "set up a Crosse at Chesupioc Bay, and named spent the greater part of the next 5 months made up the initial party that went ashore to that place Cape Henry" for Henry, Prince of in the strict confines of three small ships, see the "faire meddowes," "Fresh-waters," and Wales, oldest son of King James I. -
Nelson County Comprehensive Plan
Nelson County Comprehensive Plan As Approved by the Nelson County Board of Supervisors and Nelson County Planning Commission Adopted _______, 2012 Prepared by The Nelson County Planning Commission with the assistance of The Citizens of Nelson County at the request of The Nelson County Board of Supervisors Staff support from the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Design Resources Center, University of Virginia Nelson County Department of Planning Nelson County Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary i Chapter One-Portrait of Nelson County 1 A Brief History of Nelson County 1 Nelson County Today 2 Chapter Two-Purpose of the Plan 4 Chapter Three-Goals and Principles 5 Economic Development 5 Transportation 7 Education 8 Public and Human Services 9 Natural, Scenic, and Historic Resources 10 Recreation 11 Development Areas 13 Rural Conservation 14 Chapter Four-Land Use Plan 16 Introduction 16 Land Use Planning Data 17 Existing Land Use 17 Areas Served by Water and/or Sewer 19 Environmental Constraints: Steep Slopes, Soil Potential for Agricultural Use 21 Land Use Plan for Designated Development Areas 25 Rural Small Town Development Model 26 Rural Village Development Model 28 Neighborhood Mixed Use Development Model 30 Mixed Commercial Development Model 32 Light Industrial Development Model 34 Land Use Plan for Rural Conservation Areas 36 Future Land Use Plan and Map 38 Chapter Five – Transportation Plan 41 Introduction 41 Purpose 41 Background 42 Existing Plans and Studies 42 Existing Roadway Inventory 48 Interstate -
Lessons for Coastal Cities from Hurricane Sandy (PDF)
NRDC: Preparing for Climate Change - Lessons for Coastal Cities from Hurricane Sandy (PDF) APRIL 2014 NRDC REPORT R:14-04-A Preparing for Climate Change: Lessons for Coastal Cities from Hurricane Sandy AUTHORS: Kim Knowlton, Dr.P.H. Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, M.P.H. Natural Resources Defense Council ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Zev Ross and Hollie Kitson of ZevRoss Spatial Analysis, Ithaca, New York, for conducting the mapping of areas in the five boroughs of New York City that were affected by unexpected flooding as a result of Hurricane Sandy in October–November 2012. We would also like to acknowledge the sustainable development project work of Barnard College students Carly Wertheim, Mariah Chen, Reeva Dua, Claudia Mack, Jenny Pensky, and Emilie Schattman (advised by professor Martin Stute), who, in the fall of 2013, developed a preliminary analysis of health and economic costs in areas unexpectedly flooded during Hurricane Sandy. Their work helped shape this issue brief. This work is an outgrowth of a panel presentation titled Climate Change & Public Health Policy Implications of Sandy, given by Kim Knowlton, Dr.P.H., at a Special Session of the 2013 American Public Health Association meeting in Boston. We are grateful to the following colleagues and external peer reviewers who provided invaluable comments on this report: David Abramson of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness; Patrick L. Kinney, director of the Climate and Health Program at the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; Robert Moore and Ben Chou of NRDC’s Climate and Water program; and NRDC colleagues Steve Fleischli, Becky Hammer, Becky Hayat, Theo Spencer and Monty Schmitt. -
The Wilmington Wave National Weather Service, Wilmington, NC
The Wilmington Wave National Weather Service, Wilmington, NC VOLUME III, ISSUE 1 F A L L 2 0 1 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Summer 2013: Above Average Rainfall Summer 2013 1-2 - Brad Reinhart Rainfall If you spent time outside this summer, your outdoor activities were probably interrupted by Top 3 Strongest 3-5 rain at some point. Of course, afternoon showers and thunderstorms during the summertime Storms in Wilmington are fairly common in the eastern Carolinas. But, did you know that we experienced record rainfall totals, rising rivers, and flooding within our forecast area this meteorological summer Masonboro 6-8 (June – August 2013)? Here’s a recap of what turned out to be quite a wet summer. Buoy Florence, SC received the most rainfall (27.63’’) of our four climate sites during the months The Tsunami 9-12 of June, July, and August. This total was a staggering 12.53’’ above normal for the summer months. In July alone, 14.91’’ of rain fell in Florence. This made July 2013 the wettest Local Hail Study 12-13 month EVER in Florence since records began in 1948! Wilmington, NC received 25.78’’ of rain this summer, which was 6.35’’ above normal. North Myrtle Beach, SC and Lumberton, A Summer of 14 Decision NC received well over 20 inches of rain as well. Support Excess rainfall must go somewhere, so many of our local rivers rose in response to the heavy rain across the Carolinas. In total, 8 of our 11 river forecast points exceeded flood stage this summer. Some of these rivers flooded multiple times; in fact, our office issued 24 river flood warnings and 144 river flood statements from June to August. -
UB Powerpoint Template
converge.colorado.edu CONVERGE ethical, coordinated, and scientifically rigorous social science, engineering, and interdisciplinary extreme events research Lori Peek Principal Investigator, CONVERGE, SSEER, and ISEEER Director, Natural Hazards Center Professor, Department of Sociology University of Colorado Boulder Session 2: Collecting, Managing, and Archiving Social and Behavioral Science Data Describe opportunities for identifying and coordinating social science researchers so that we can best share information and publish our data as well as data collection protocols using DOIs, repositories, etc. Discuss some of the overarching challenges and concerns with sharing social science data, such as privacy, data management plans and related IRB policies, duplication vs. replication, etc. converge.colorado.edu 4 Things converge.colorado.edu 1. NSF has funded the CONVERGE initiative converge.colorado.edu Why CONVERGE? Why CONVERGE? • identify and coordinate researchers and research teams; • advance hazards and disaster research; • encourage the publication of data and data collection instruments and protocols (DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure + CONVERGE). • support and accelerate training and mentoring; • fund virtual reconnaissance, field research, and the development of novel research instruments and data collection protocols; • accelerate the development of mobile applications for social science data collection (NHERI RAPID); Why CONVERGE? 2. NSF Supports Extreme Events Research (EER) Networks converge.colorado.edu Why the EER’s? Disciplinary -
6B.3 Synoptic Composites of the Extratropical Transition Lifecycle of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones: Factors Determining Post-Transition Evolution
6B.3 SYNOPTIC COMPOSITES OF THE EXTRATROPICAL TRANSITION LIFECYCLE OF NORTH ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONES: FACTORS DETERMINING POST-TRANSITION EVOLUTION Robert E. Hart1, Jenni L. Evans2, and Clark Evans1 1Department of Meteorology, Florida State University 2Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY Over the past five years, the extratropical a. Datasets transition (ET) lifecycle has been defined based upon Storm composites performed here were satellite signatures (Klein et al. 2000) and objective based upon 1°×1° resolution Navy Operational measures of dynamic and thermal structure (Evans Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS; and Hart 2003). Following ET, tropical cyclones Hogan et al. 1991) operational analyses for the period (TCs) can become explosive cold-core cyclones, 1998-2003. During these six years, 34 Atlantic TCs explosive warm-seclusion cyclones, or simply decay underwent resolvable ET as diagnosed within the as a cold-core cyclone (Hart 2003; Evans and Hart cyclone phase space (CPS) 2003). Each of these three evolution paths has (http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase). dramatically different wind and precipitation field b. Methodology (Bosart et al. 2001), and ocean wave (Bowyer 2000; i. Normalizing the ET timeline Bowyer and Fogarty 2003) responses associated with The ET lifecycle defined in Evans and Hart it. Furthermore, the envelope of realized intensity is (2003) is used here, with the beginning of ET fundamentally related to the structure obtained after (labeled as TB) as the time when the storm becomes ET (Hart 2003), so incorrect forecasts of storm significantly asymmetric (B>10) and end of ET structure have the effect of also degrading the (labeled as TE) the time when the lower-tropospheric L intensity forecasts.