DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Metropolis Joint Initiative Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Metropolis Joint Initiative Program Social Sciences and Humanities Conseil de recherches en Research Council of Canada sciences humaines du Canada Citizenship and Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada Immigration Canada Evaluation Metropolis Program Joint Initiative of Citizenship and Immigration Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Fall 2000 E v a l u a t i o n o f M e t r o p o l i s P r o g r a m Table of Contents Executive Summary . .1 Description Background . .3 Objectives . .3 Budget . .3 Governance . .4 The Metropolis Centres Research Programs . .4 Evaluation Phase 1: A Mid-term Peer Review . .6 Highlights of the Review . .6 Scope of the Centres . .6 Partnerships and Policy Relevance . .6 Training . .7 Conclusion . .7 Phase 2: An Overall Strategic Assessment . .8 Approach and Methodology . .8 Objectives of the Assessment . .8 Summary . .8 General Conclusion . .11 Appendices 1. Summary of the Metropolis Program Federal Partners Meeting . .13 2. Metropolis Program Strategic Assessment Centre Directors Meeting . .16 3. Project Team Meeting—Executive Summary Report . .20 4. Research Results Reported by the Centres . .24 5. Metropolis Centres Managers . .38 6. Evaluation Steering Committee Members . .41 7. Members of the Mid-term Review Committees . .43 Table of Contents i E v a l u a t i o n o f M e t r o p o l i s P r o g r a m Executive Summary Established in 1995 under the Joint Initiatives evaluation of the Program and to focus on Program of The Social Sciences and a strategic assessment, emphasizing the over- Humanities Research Council of Canada all results and accomplishments in relation to (SSHRC), the Metropolis Program supports the program objectives. To this end, a ques- four university-based research Centres on tionnaire was sent to federal funding partners immigration and integration. The Program to learn their views about the Program. This is funded by SSHRC and a consortium of was followed by a focus group meeting with seven federal departments and agencies led representatives of all the federal funding by Citizenship and Immigration Canada partners. A second focus group was held (CIC). The four Centres will receive a total of with the four Centres' directors and other $8 million over the six years ending in 2002. researchers. A final focus group discussion When the Program was created, it was stipu- was held with staff of the Project Team—the lated that a review of the Centres' progress group that administers the Metropolis Program would take place after three years and that, as a whole. sometime thereafter, an evaluation of the overall achievements of the Program would The assessment revealed that the Metropolis be carried out. Program is contributing significant, new and useful knowledge on the subjects of In 1999, four expert committees conducted a immigration and integration. The Program's mid-term scientific review of each Centre. research projects, developed in collaboration The committees were unanimous in stating with community partners, provide relevant that the Centres had made significant progress information and tools to develop and assess in reaching their objectives and those of the policies and improve services. However, Program. They noted that the Metropolis increased linkages with the federal funders Centres constituted a unique, made-in-Canada are needed to improve the relevance of the concept, with no equivalent internationally. research at the national level. The Centres involved more than 250 commu- nity organizations, had more than 240 projects The assessment also found that the Centres underway, in which close to 300 researchers are providing multidisciplinary training focused were participating, provided employment and on community policy development, that they training for approximately 400 students, and are intensively involved in disseminating were germane to 115 M.A. and Ph.D. theses. research results to target audiences, and The committees also noted, however, the that they are providing expert advice in need to strengthen relationships between the public debates on immigration issues. The Centres and the federal funding partners. assessment noted the impressive scope and diversity of community involvement with the On the basis of this comprehensive mid-term Centres. review, the Metropolis Evaluation Steering Committee decided to forego a traditional Executive Summary 1 E v a l u a t i o n o f M e t r o p o l i s P r o g r a m The Centres are now at the point of conso- lidating their respective strategies and moving toward national comparative studies to strategically feed policy development. This change should of course lead to a greater capacity to undertake international comparative studies. The Project Team could continue to play an active role in improving linkages between the Centres and the federal funding partners and in developing capacity for more national and international comparative studies. 2 SSHRC and CIC E v a l u a t i o n o f M e t r o p o l i s P r o g r a m Description BACKGROUND Objectives The Metropolis Program was established under the Joint Initiatives Program of the Social l To promote innovative and multidisciplinary Sciences and Humanities Research Council of research on immigration and integration in Canada by focusing on areas that are of Canada (SSHRC) in 1995. The Program key relevance to policy and program devel- supports four research Centres in the areas of opment and to service delivery in a variety immigration and integration. It is funded, at a of sectors. level of $8 million over six years, by SSHRC and a consortium, led by Citizenship and l To develop multidisciplinary research designs and new methodological approaches to the Immigration Canada (CIC), of seven federal study of immigration and integration issues. departments and agencies. Other participating departments include Canada Mortgage and l To encourage comparative research, from Housing Corporation, Canadian Heritage, both domestic and international perspectives, Health Canada, Human Resources Development which can enhance our knowledge base and inform strategic policy directions. Canada (HRDC), Solicitor General Canada and Status of Women Canada. l To promote sustained collaboration among academics, policy-makers, business and The ultimate goal of the Program is to labour groups, foundations, community organizations, practitioners and other inter- improve policies for managing immigration ested parties in the conduct of research into and diversity by enhancing academic research contemporary issues of mutual interest. capacity, focusing research on critical policy issues and options, and developing ways to l To provide research training opportunities facilitate the use of research in decision making. for students and to encourage graduate students and researchers in the early stages of their careers to conduct immigration BUDGET research. The total budget for the Metropolis Joint l To disseminate research results widely to policy makers, practitioners, community Initiative Program is $8 million over six years, organizations and the general public. including SSHRC's contribution of $3 million ($500 000 annually). addition to this core federal support, the Each Centre receives a grant of $340 000 per Centres draw financial assistance from other year for six years, between 1996 and 2002. federal departments, provincial governments, This grant supports research and covers costs non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and related to governance and management. In the private sector to support special studies and reports. Description 3 E v a l u a t i o n o f M e t r o p o l i s P r o g r a m The Metropolis GOVERNANCE Centres The Metropolis Program has a multi-tiered system of governance. The federal level l Montréal Centre for Inter-University Research consists of the following: on Immigration, Integration and Urban Dynamics l the Interdepartmental Steering Committee, l The Joint Centre of Excellence for Research which provides overall strategic direction; on Immigration and Settlement (CERIS), Toronto; l the Interdepartmental Working Committee (IDWC), which promotes sharing of l Prairie Centre of Excellence for Research program research and policy information on Immigration and Integration, Edmonton; among the Centres, within the federal l The Vancouver Centre of Excellence for government and with other levels of Research on Immigration and Integration in government in Canada; the Metropolis (RIIM). l the Project Team (housed at CIC), which acts as co-ordinator for the Centres and At the Centre level, a composite of represen- funders, promotes the Program nationally tatives—federal, provincial, municipal, private and internationally, and acts as a sector and NGO—sit on research, management Secretariat for both the Steering and the and advisory boards and provide strategic and Working Committees. policy direction. At the international level, an International The Centres work with 15 universities and Steering Committee provides general strategic several hundred affiliated researchers, post- direction to the international component of doctoral fellows and graduate students, as well the Program, which has its own, separate fund- as hundreds of community partners in a multi- ing arrangement. This component involves institutional, multidisciplinary collaborative policy-makers and researchers from more than research environment. 20 countries. This Committee's main activity is to organize an annual conference which Research Programs serves as the forum for international senior government officials
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Providing Social Support for Immigrants and Refugees in Canada: Challenges and Directions
    Journal of Immigrant Health, Vol. 7, No. 4, October 2005 (C 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10903-005-5123-1 Providing Social Support for Immigrants and Refugees in Canada: Challenges and Directions Laura Simich,1,5 Morton Beiser,2 Miriam Stewart,3 and Edward Mwakarimba4 In this article we report research findings from a qualitative study of social support for immi- grants and refugees in Canada. We focus on challenges from the perspectives of 137 service providers and policymakers in health and immigrant settlement who participated in in-depth interviews and focus groups in three Canadian cities. Results show that social support is perceived to play an important role in immigrant settlement and to have a positive impact on immigrant health, although immigrants face many systemic challenges. Systemic issues— limited resources, lack of integration of policies and programs and narrow service mandates— also limit service providers’ abilities to meet newcomer’s needs. This research suggests that changes in public discourse about immigrants’ contributions, improved governance and ser- vice coordination, and a holistic, long-term perspective are important to more effectively support immigrant settlement and to promote immigrant health and well being. KEY WORDS: social support; immigrants; Canada; policy and services; barriers. INTRODUCTION family members, friends, peers and ...professionals that communicate information, esteem, practical, or Social support is a basic determinant of health, emotional help,” (3) plays a particularly important as vital to maintaining well being as food, shelter, role during major transition periods by enhancing income, and access to health care and social opportu- coping, moderating the impact of stressors and nities (1).
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The
    American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research The Journal of the National Center Volume 8, Number 2, 1998 American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research Copyright: Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health Colorado School of Public Health/University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (www.ucdenver.edu/caianh) EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Spero M. Manson, Ph.D. JOURNAL MANAGER Billie K. Greene RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ANNA BARÓN, Ph.D. SANDRA K. JOOS, Ph.D. University of Colorado H.S.C. Portland VA Medical Center JANETTE BEALS, Ph.D. ELLEN KEANE, M.S.P.H. University of Colorado H.S.C. University of Colorado H.S.C. DONALD W. BECHTOLD, M.D. JEFFREY KING, Ph.D. University of Colorado H.S.C. Denver, Colorado MORTON BEISER, M.D. J. DAVID KINZIE, M.D. University of Toronto Oregon Health Sciences University JOSEPH D. BLOOM, M.D. JOYCE KRAMER, Ph.D. Oregon Health Sciences University University of Minnesota JAMES BOEHNLEIN, M.D. TERESA D. LaFROMBOISE, Ph.D. Oregon Health Sciences University Stanford University PAUL DAUPHINAIS, Ph.D. PAUL K. LEUNG, M.D. Turtle Mountain Community College Oregon Health Sciences University RHONDA DICK, B.S. JERROLD E. LEVY, Ph.D. University of Colorado H.S.C. University of Arizona NORMAN G. DINGES, Ph.D. CAROL LUJAN, Ph.D. University of Alaska, Anchorage Arizona State University CANDACE M. FLEMING, Ph.D. PHILIP A. MAY, Ph.D. University of Colorado H.S.C. University of New Mexico GEORGE M. GUILMET, Ph.D. BEATRICE MEDICINE, Ph.D. University of Puget Sound Wakpala, South Dakota ROBERT HACKENBERG, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement of Refugee Children and Youth in Canada
    “Is this called home?” Resettlement of refugee children and youth in Canada Lori Wilkinson, Professor Department of Sociology and Criminology GESIS Lecture Series 2017/8 Mannheim, Germany 26 April 2018 400.000 Immigrants to Canada 2006-2017 350.000 Source: IRCC, 2018 300.000 All Other Immigrants Refugee claimants 250.000 Resettled Refugees Sponsored Family 200.000 Economic immigrants 150.000 100.000 50.000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 All People entering Canada, 2006-2017 Source: IRCC, 2017 1.600.000 . International Mobility 1.400.000 Temporary Work International Students 1.200.000 All Other Immigrants Refugee claimants 1.000.000 Resettled Refugees Sponsored Family 800.000 Economic immigrants 600.000 CANADA FACTS Population 2017: 36.9 million Proportion immigrant: 23.8% 400.000 Proportion 2nd generation: 17.7% Proportion racialized: 22.2% 200.000 Indigenous: 2.1 million (6.2%) 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Geographic distribution of refugees 2017 • Does not account for secondary migration between provinces • Some provinces host proportionately high numbers of refugees (AB, MB, QC) 25 • Refugees make up 1% of the total pop. 10 890 18,805 8,015 39,405 480 13,050 2,235 IRCC, 2018 2,435 3,710 7,625 Source Region, Refugees 2006-2015 120,0 100,0 80,0 USA Europe 60,0 Asia and Pacific Americas 40,0 Africa and Middle East 20,0 0,0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: IRCC 2017 Refugee Claimants Canada, 1999-2017 50.000 45.000 40.000 35.000 30.000 25.000 REFUGEE
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed-Method Research on Bhutanese
    GURUNG, ANUJ, Ph. D., August 2019 POLITICAL SCIENCE ANATOMY OF RESETTLEMENT: MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH ON BHUTANESE REFUGEES (410 PP.) Dissertation Advisor: Landon E. Hancock This dissertation is a much-needed study of how resettlement impacts refugees. I found the ‘solution’ of resettlement to be promising for some refugees yet restrictive for others. Based on my analysis, Bhutanese refugees interpret their past and present differently in negotiating their place and identity in resettlement. In Akron, many have found stable jobs, started businesses, and are pursuing higher education aspirations. Opportunities in resettlement and their positive self-perception allows these individuals to expand and ‘own’ their new revised identities (e.g. Bhutanese-Nepali), in contrast to the primary socialized identity preferences (i.e. the Bhutanese label) of refugees who find themselves marginalized and dependent in their new environment. At a broader level, I have found the US resettlement policy to be exclusively invested in economic output of refugees with little regard for their socio-cultural adaptation. Given the diversity of refugee experiences and their reasons behind ‘choosing’ resettlement, resettlement policy merits further critical examination and likely a structural revision. Scholars of refugee and immigrant behavior, as well as interested policy makers will find this work highly pertinent. In this study, I used ethnographic research—interviews and field observations—centered on Bhutanese refugees; I also employed a limited statistical examination of refugee migration patterns in the US. i ANATOMY OF RESETTLEMENT: MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH ON BHUTANESE REFUGEES A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Anuj Gurung August 2019 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials ii Dissertation written by Anuj Gurung B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • International Metropolis Conference 2014 International Metropolis Conference
    ORGANIZED BY OFFICIAL SPONSORS 2014 INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE 2014 INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE FONDAZIONE ISMU INIZIATIVE E STUDI SULLA MULTIETNICITÀ ENERGY FOR THE PLANET MIGRATION FEEDING CULTURES MILAN, 3-7 NOVEMBER 2014 CONTACT DETAILS FONDAZIONE ISMU – METROPOLIS 2014 Via Copernico 1 – 20125 Milan – ITALY +39 026787791 [email protected] Secretary General of the Local Organising Committee: Prof. Vincenzo Cesareo Secretary General – ISMU Foundation [email protected] Howard Duncan Executive Head, Metropolis [email protected] Conference Secretariat: Cecilia Lindenberg +39 0267877948 [email protected] For general information: [email protected] 2014 INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE Migration: Energy for the Planet, Feeding Cultures Published in Milan by ISMU Foundation - October 2014 Graphic design and print by GRAPHIDEA Srl Via Gustavo Fara, 35 - Milan 2014 INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE CONTENT GREETINGS ....................................................... 3 PROGRAM OVERVIEW......................................10 MAPS ................................................................12 CULTURAL TOURS............................................17 SOCIAL EVENTS ...............................................21 PLENARY SESSIONS....................................... 25 WORKSHOPS................................................... 43 EXHIBITORS ...................................................107 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................... 111 SPONSORS ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population Studies Centre 2007 ANNUAL REPORT
    Population Studies Centre 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand http://www.waikato.ac.nz/wfass/populationstudiescentre/ Ph: +64 7 8384040 Fax: +64 7 8384621 Email: [email protected] A Very Successful Year in Perspective The highlight for the Population Studies Centre in 2007 was the launch by the Hon Steve Maharey, then Minister of Research, Science and Technology, of the landmark demographic history of the New Zealand family by Professor Ian Pool, Dr Arunachalam Dharmalingam and Dr Janet Sceats. The New Zealand Family from 1840. A Demographic History, published by Auckland University Press, was officially launched in Te Papa on 3rd July at the Population Association of New Zealand‟s Biennial Conference in Wellington. Mr Maharey welcomed the publication of such a wide-ranging and exhaustive study of the demography of the New Zealand family, and paid tribute to the outstanding contributions that Ian and Janet in particular have made to research on New Zealand‟s population over the past 40 years. The Population Association of New Zealand conferred Life Membership on Professor Pool at the Association‟s Annual General Meeting on 4 July – again a very fitting acknowledgement of the contribution Ian has made to the development of research and teaching on population issues in New Zealand. In July Dr Suzan van der Pas (pictured), a Dutch demographer who has specialized in research on intergenerational relationships of older adults in the Netherlands, was appointed to a part-time Senior Researcher position in the Population Studies Centre. She joins the team of researchers working on the FRST-funded „Enhancing Wellbeing in an Ageing Society‟ programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Integration of Refugees in Canada: a Mixed Record?
    THE ECONOMIC INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES IN CANADA: A MIXED RECORD? By Lori Wilkinson and Joseph Garcea TRANSATLANTIC COUNCIL ON MIGRATION THE ECONOMIC INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES IN CANADA A Mixed Record? By Lori Wilkinson and Joseph Garcea April 2017 Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments provided by Maria Vincenza Desiderio, Kate Hooper, and Susan Fratzke of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) that made this a much stronger report. The editorial assistance of Lauren Shaw is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank colleagues who assisted on various aspects of the Western Canadian Settlement Survey, including Li Zong at the University of Saskatchewan, Leah Hamilton at Mount Royal University, and Victoria Esses at Western University. Thanks also go to the Social Science Research Laboratory at the University of Saskatchewan and the Population Research Laboratory at the University of Alberta. Finally, thanks go to the officials at Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and researchers at MPI for their invaluable observations and suggestions, and to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) Western Region for their funding support of the Western Canadian Settlement Survey. This research was commissioned by the Transatlantic Council on Migration, an MPI initiative, for its sixteenth plenary meeting, held in Toronto in June 2016. The meeting’s theme was “The Other Side of the Asylum and Resettlement Coin: Investing in Refugees’ Success along the Migration Continuum,” and this report was among those that informed the Council’s discussions. The Council is a unique deliberative body that examines vital policy issues and informs migration policymaking processes in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • INYI Journal
    III International Network on Youth Integration Volume 2, issue 1, 2011 NNN The International Network on Youth Integration is an international network for knowledge ex- change and collaboration. Activities of the Network include, amongst others: 1. An exchange of information about members’ and other’s publications; 2. Organization of Visiting Scholar/ YYY Post-doctoral exchanges between members’ institutions; 3. Collaboration on new proposals (with different members of the INYI taking the lead, depending upon source of funding and research focus); and 4. Collaboration on workshops/presentations at international confer- ences. III IN THIS NEWSLETTER 1. We feature two of our members: Dr. Karen Aroian and Dr. Richard Lalonde 2. Other Highlights (new members, publications, events and books) 3. 2011 Member list Dear colleagues, With the arrival of Summer 2011 it is our pleasure to bring you Volume 2 (issue 1) of the INYI Newslet- ter. Past issues of the newsletter can be found at: http://www.yorku.ca/nkhanlou/inyi.html In this issue we feature the work of two INYI colleagues: Dr. Karen Aroian (from the United States) and Dr. Richard Lalonde (from Canada). We welcome two new INYI members: Dr. Morton Beiser and Ms. Niusha Ghazban (both from Canada). Our INYI colleagues have been busy publishing (please see new publications section). We congratulate Dr. Gakuba and his colleagues on the publication of their book Migration of Sub-Saharan African Youth . I thank Tulika Agarwal-Narale for compiling this latest issue of the INYI Newsletter and wish her the very best in her new endeavours. Warm regards, Nazilla Khanlou , RN, PhD Echo Chair in Women’s Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health & Associate Professor, School of Nursing, York University, Canada [email protected] June 2011 1 III DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, March 6, 2013
    106th Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association March 3-5, 2016 Crowne Plaza Times Square Manhattan Improving Psychiatric Research and Care through Differentiated Phenomenology Layout and Design by Daniela Reich-Erkelenz Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich 1 SPEAKERS Morton Beiser, CM, MD, FRCP Layla Kassem, PhD Ryerson University National Institute of Mental Health Joshua Breslau, PhD John Keilp, PhD RAND Corporation Columbia University Robert Brooner, PhD Matcheri Keshavan, MD Johns Hopkins University Harvard University Linda Brzustowicz, MD Katherine M. Keyes, PhD, MPH Rutgers University Columbia University Rita Charon, MD, PhD James R. Lupski, MD, PhD Columbia University Baylor College of Medicine Diana E. Clarke, PhD Francis J. McMahon, MD American Psychiatric Association National Institute of Mental Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Adey Nyamathi, PhD, ANP, FAAN C. Robert Cloninger, MD University of California, Los Angeles Washington University Dost Öngür, MD, PhD Francesc Colom, PhD McLean Hospital University of Barcelona, Catalonia Harvard University Bruce Cuthbert, PhD Josef Parnas, MD National Institute of Mental Health University of Copenhagen, Denmark Thomas Fuchs, MD, PhD Elise Robinson, ScD Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany Massachusetts General Hospital Hanga Galfalvy, PhD Ursula Staudinger, PhD Columbia University Columbia University Danielle Hairston, MD Sophia Vinogradov, MD Howard University University of California, San Francisco San Francisco VA Medical Center Stephan H. Heckers, MD Vanderbilt University Helen Wilson, PhD Stanford University John M. Kane, MD Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine 2 CHAIRS & DISCUSSANTS Paula J. Clayton, MD University of Minnesota Doreen M. Olvet, PhD University of New Mexico Stony Brook University Michael B. First, MD Maria A. Oquendo, MD Columbia University Columbia University Helen L.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Urban Governance › the Way Forward
    Integrated Urban Governance › The way forward Commission 3 Manual 2011 Commission 3 Integrated Urban Governance Presidency: Berlin Vice-Presidencies: Mexico State, Porto Alegre Chair: Ingeborg Junge-Reyer, Mayor and Senator for Urban Development, Berlin Vice-chair: José Fortunati, Mayor of Porto Alegre Enrique Peña Nieto, Governor of the State of Mexico Coordinator: Barbara Berninger, Senate Department for Urban Development, Berlin, Head of Division for EU and International Affairs Participating cities: Abidjan, Addis Ababa, Ahwaz, Amman, Antananarivo, Bamako, Bangui, Barcelona, Belo Horizonte, Brasilia, Brazzaville, Brussels, Cairo, Colombo, Dakar, Diyarbakir, Douala, Gauteng Province, Guadalajara, Guangzhou, Guarulhos, Kampala, Kathmandu, Kinshasa, Madrid, Mashhad, Melbourne, Moscow, Niamey, Nouakchott, Paris (Ile-de-France), Rabat, Rio de Janeiro, Santiago de Chile, São Paulo, Seoul, Shiraz, Stockholm, Sydney, Tabriz, Taipei, Teheran, Utrecht, Yaoundé Other cities/institutions: CISCO, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationa- le Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning (IRS, Erkner), Heriot-Watt University (Edinburgh), Sustainable Cities Research Institute (Newcastle upon Tyne), UN-Habitat Other cities/institutions: Cities contributing by questionnaire: Barcelona, Berlin, Brasilia, Dubai, Guarulhos, Kathmandu, Las Vegas, Lisboa, Los Angeles, Madrid, Mashhad, Melbourne, Mexico, Nairobi, New York, Portland, Porto Alegre, San Francisco, Stockholm, Teheran, Washington, Wien, Yangzhou Berlin Metropolis
    [Show full text]
  • Deportation: Two Worlds, One (Re) Integration Keynote Speaker Time: 10H30 – 15H30 William Lacy Swing IOM General Director – SWITZERLAND
    16TH INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE Migration Futures: Perspectives on global changes 16TH INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE Migration Futures: Perspectives on global changes EDITION Presidency of the Government of the Azores Regional Secretary of the Presidency Regional Department for the Communities DESIGN, LAYOUT AND PRINTING Bizex Projectos CIRCULATION 750 September 2011 4 CONTENT INTRODUCTION 04 SOCIAL EVENTS 12 STUDY TOURS 18 PLENARY PROGRAMME 26 PLENARY PROGRAMME BIOGRAPHIES 36 WORKSHOPS SCHEDULE 52 WORKSHOPS 13 SEPTEMBER 60 WORKSHOPS 14 SEPTEMBER 72 WORKSHOPS 15 SEPTEMBER 84 POSTER TITLES 96 GENERAL INFO 98 NOTES 109 5 16TH INTERNATIONAL METROPOLIS CONFERENCE Migration Futures: Perspectives on global changes THE AZORES IN THE WORLD ROUTES It is with great pleasure that I welcome to the Azores all the participants in the 16th International Metropolis Conference. The Azores, port of departure and of arrival of migrants since the fifteenth century, in the coming days will become the main stage of the global debate on the new challenges of human mobility in a truly interdisciplinary dimension before an increasingly interdependent world subjected to the economic and trade consequences of globalization. As many of you must know, the Azores, in their privileged geographical condition, have always been a reference site in the North Atlantic, assuming over the centuries a strategic role in the relations between America and Europe and Africa. At this intersection of peoples and cultures, the Azorean forged their own and unique identity, based on the settlement of communities spread over nine islands, but united in their sense of society with more than five centuries of history. Emigration is also part of the history of the Azores.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Integration in Canada: a Survey of Empirical Evidence and Existing Services
    Refugee Integration in Canada: A Survey of Empirical Evidence and Existing Services Soojin Yu, Estelle Ouellet, and Angelyn Warmington Abstract Introduction While a fairly large body of empirical research and policy Refugees have consistently made up over 10 per cent of the documents exists on immigrant integration in Canada, annual inflow of newcomers to Canada in the last decade.1 studies on refugee integration are scarce. This paper at- However, while a fairly large body of empirical research and tempts to fill this gap. It summarizes what is known about policy documents exists on immigrant integration in Can- ada, studies on refugee integration are scarce. Very few refugees’ economic and socio-cultural integration patterns Canadian studies on refugees have a truly national scope or in Canada and what integration services are available to contain systematic empirical analyses, and many are limited them in order to identify empirical knowledge gaps and to reporting on one specific refugee community.2 service gaps. Whenever salient and possible, the distinc- Despite the lack of a shared definition for “successful tion among the Government-Assisted Refugees, Privately integration” in academic or policy discourse,3 most schol- Sponsored Refugees, Landed-in-Canada Refugees and ars and policy makers in Canada and elsewhere agree with refugee claimants is made. a description of “integration” as a “dynamic, multi-faceted two-way process which requires adaptation on the part of Resume the newcomers, but also the society of destination.”4 Hence, Alors qu’il existe une masse assez considérable de docu- most generally accept that “integration,” as opposed to ments de recherches empiriques et de politiques officielles one-way assimilation, outright marginalization, or segrega- 5 ayant trait à l’intégration des immigrants au Canada, les tion, is desirable.
    [Show full text]