rmed Conflicts in Africa and Western A Complicity: A Disincentive for African Union’s Cooperation with the ICC Ifeonu Eberechi* ……………………… Abstract Intrinsic in the concept of international justice for violations of international humanitarian law is the requirement of cooperation by states and, to a large extent, regional bodies with the International Criminal Court (ICC). Unlike domestic courts, the ICC is not endowed with law enforcement power nor could such power be imputed to it as part of its functions. It is against this background that the on-going crisis of corporation between the ICC and the African Union (AU) following the indictment of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for international crime portends a far reaching implication for the administration of international criminal accountability. As part of a broader diagnosis of the reasons for the AU’s opposition, this paper, while discussing armed conflicts in Africa, which provides the fillip for gross human rights violations in the region, exposes the contributions of the West. It concludes that an effective enforcement of international justice in the region must include an inquiry into the role of international actors and Western powers in promoting and exacerbating the situation. _______________ *LL.M., Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Formerly an Attorney-at-Law in the law firm of Chuma Nwosu and Co., Port Harcourt, Nigeria (
[email protected]). This article is adapted from a thesis completed under the supervision of Professor Robert Currie at the Dalhousie University, School of Law. I am most grateful for his insight and encouragement. I am equally grateful to the anonymous peer reviewers for their comments.