DOCSLIB.ORG

Water in the Atmosphere 97

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water in the Atmosphere 97 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Caption goes here © Jonesand can & several Bartlett lines Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOTlong FOR as shownSALE here. OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Caption goes here and can several lines long as shown here. Caption goes here and can several lines long as shown here. © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4NOT FOR SALEWater OR DISTRIBUTION in the AtmosphereNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHHAPTTEER OUUTLLININE INTRODUCTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOTEVAPORATION: FOR SALE OR THE DISTRIBUTION SOURCE OF ATMOSPHERICNOT WATER FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION MEASURING WATER VAPOR IN THE AIR ■ Mixing Ratio ■ Vapor Pressure © Jones & Bartlett■ Relative Learning, Humidity LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE■ ORDew DISTRIBUTION Point/Frost Point NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CONDENSATION AND DEPOSITION: CLOUD FORMATION ■ Solute and Curvature Effects © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 96 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. Water in the Atmosphere 97 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & CBartlettHAPTTEE Learning,R OUUTLIN LLCE, CONTINUED NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NUCLEATION ■ Condensation Nuclei ■ Ice Nuclei © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC ■ Cloud ParticleNOT Growth FOR bySALE Condensation OR DISTRIBUTION and Deposition NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION FOG FORMATION ■ Radiation Fog ■ Advection Fog ■ ©Evaporation Jones & Bartlett Fog Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC ■ NOTUpslope FOR Fog SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION LIFTING MECHANISMS THAT FORM CLOUDS STATIC STABILITY AND CLOUD DEVELOPMENT © Jones & Bartlett■ The Saturated Learning, Adiabatic LLC Lapse Rate © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE■ Conditionally OR DISTRIBUTION Unstable Environments NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CLOUD CLASSIFICATION ■ Low Clouds ■ Precipitating Clouds ■ Middle Clouds© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC ■ High Clouds NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CLOUDS AND THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT CLOUD COMPOSITION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC PRECIPITATION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION ■ Precipitation Growth in Warm Clouds ■ Precipitation Growth in Cold Clouds ■ Precipitation Types ■ Clouds, Lapse Rates, and Precipitation Near Mountains © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEPUTTING OR DISTRIBUTION IT ALL TOGETHER NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION ■ Summary ■ Key Terms ■ Review Questions ■ Observation ©Activities Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION AFTER COMPLETING THIS CHAPTER, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO: • Define saturation and its importance in the atmosphere • Explain why there can be more water vapor in warm air than cold air and ©how Jones this affects& Bartlett the atmosphereLearning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC • NOTDescribe FOR how SALE clouds OR and DISTRIBUTION precipitation form NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION • Identify the major cloud and precipitation types, and explain the significant differences among them © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 98 CHAPTER 4 Water in the Atmosphere © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning,INTRODUCTION LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION On January 26–28, 2009, a layer of ice encased the central United States from Texas to West Virginia. The precipitation fell mostly as rain, but the temperatures at the ground were cold enough for the rain to freeze on contact with anything it touched (see fi gures below). The storm coated© Jones many & areas Bartlett with Learning,more than an LLC inch (2.5 cm) of ice, killing© Jones more than & Bartlett 60 people— Learning, LLC 35NOT in Kentucky FOR SALE alone. OR Most DISTRIBUTION of the deaths were due to traffi c accidents,NOT FOR extreme SALE cold, OR and DISTRIBUTION carbon monoxide poisoning (caused by power generators or kerosene heaters being used indoors without proper ventilation). Trees fell and power lines snapped under the weight of the ice, leaving more than 1.3 million people without electricity. It seemed as if Mother Nature had declared an icy war on the region—and as if to confi rm this impression, the entire Kentucky Army © Jones & BartlettNational GuardLearning, was mobilized LLC to help with the many© problems Jones left& Bartlett in the wake Learning, of this storm. LLC NOT FOR SALEIn OR this DISTRIBUTION chapter, we explore water in the atmosphereNOT FOR in all SALE its phases: OR water DISTRIBUTION vapor, liquid water, and ice. We will explain how fog, clouds, and precipitation form. We will also learn how slightly different temperature conditions can turn a cold rain into pellets of ice or into a destructive freezing rain that can paralyze half a nation. © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 3.00 2.50 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett2.00 Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR1.75 DISTRIBUTION 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC0.50 NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION0.25 0.10 0.01 0.00 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones &Inches Bartlett of Freezing Learning, Rain LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORin theSALE January OR 2009 DISTRIBUTION Ice Storm Source: NOAA/NWS. © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. Evaporation: The Source of Atmospheric Water 99 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & EVAPORATION:Bartlett Learning, THE LLC SOURCE OF ATMOSPHERIC WATER NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Water is, near the surface, the atmosphere’s most abundant trace gas. How does water enter the atmosphere? Evaporation puts it there. As we learned in Chapter 1, evaporation is the process by which water is converted from liquid form into its gaseous state, water vapor. Evaporation occurs constantly over the surface© Jones of the & Earth. Bartlett When Learning, water molecules LLC at the surface of liquid© waterJones & Bartlett Learning, LLC gain enough energy toNOT escape FOR as vapor SALE into OR the DISTRIBUTIONair above, evaporation results. As we learnedNOT in FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Chapter 2, it takes a lot of latent heat energy to change liquid water to vapor. Evaporation therefore occurs more rapidly over warmer surfaces, which supply water molecules with enough energy to escape into the atmosphere. Evaporation is also greater when the atmospheric pressure is low, the wind speed is high, and there is relatively little water vapor already in the air. To© understandJones & evaporationBartlett Learning, better, let’s consider LLC the following example.© Put Jones some liquid & Bartlett water in Learning, LLC a closedNOT container. FOR KeepSALE the OR container DISTRIBUTION at a constant temperature and pressure.NOT Initially FOR the SALE container OR DISTRIBUTION has only liquid water in it (FIGURE 4-1a). Some individual molecules in the liquid water will have more (and some will have less) kinetic energy than the average. For instance, a water molecule in the liquid phase might gain kinetic energy considerably above the average because of several rapid © Jones &collisions Bartlett with Learning, neighboring LLC molecules. Now imagine such© Jones a molecule & Bartlett at the liquid’s Learning, surface, theLLC NOT FORboundary SALE ORbetween DISTRIBUTION the water and the air. If it has enoughNOT kinetic FOR energy SALE to overcome OR DISTRIBUTION the attractive force of nearby molecules and is moving toward the air, it may escape from the liquid (Figure 4-1b). H H O = H O molecule 2 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION (a) (b) Air 20° C © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Water © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEDry OR air DISTRIBUTIONis above water. EvaporationNOT FOR of water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Avoiding the Risks of Deadly Lightning Strikes
    Avoiding the Risks of Deadly Lightning Strikes Lightning is one of the most underrated severe weather hazards, yet ranks as the second-leading weather killer in the United States. More deadly than hurricanes or tornadoes, lightning strikes in America each year kill an average of 73 people and injure 300 others, according to NOAA's National Weather Service. How Lightning Works Lightning is caused by the attraction between positive and negative charges in the atmosphere, resulting in the buildup and discharge of electrical energy. This rapid heating and cooling of the air produces the shock wave that results in thunder. During a storm, raindrops can acquire extra electrons, which are negatively charged. These surplus electrons seek out a positive charge from the ground. As they flow from the clouds, they knock other electrons free, creating a conductive path. This path follows a zigzag shape that jumps between randomly distributed clumps of charged particles in the air. When the two charges connect, current surges through that jagged path, creating the lightning bolt. The Warning Signs High winds, rainfall, and a darkening cloud cover are the warning signs for possible cloud-to- ground lightning strikes. While many lightning casualties happen at the beginning of an approaching storm, more than 50 percent of lightning deaths occur after the thunderstorm has passed. The lightning threat diminishes after the last sound of thunder, but may persist for more than 30 minutes. When thunderstorms are in the area, but not overhead, the lightning threat can exist when skies are clear. Safety Precautions While nothing offers absolute safety from lightning, some actions can greatly reduce your risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring Weather
    Chapter 16 SOARING WEATHER While horse racing may be the "Sport of Kings," of the craft depends on the weather and the skill soaring may be considered the "King of Sports." of the pilot. Forward thrust comes from gliding Soaring bears the relationship to flying that sailing downward relative to the air the same as thrust bears to power boating. Soaring has made notable is developed in a power-off glide by a conven­ contributions to meteorology. For example, soar­ tional aircraft. Therefore, to gain or maintain ing pilots have probed thunderstorms and moun­ altitude, the soaring pilot must rely on upward tain waves with findings that have made flying motion of the air. safer for all pilots. However, soaring is primarily To a sailplane pilot, "lift" means the rate of recreational. climb he can achieve in an up-current, while "sink" A sailplane must have auxiliary power to be­ denotes his rate of descent in a downdraft or in come airborne such as a winch, a ground tow, or neutral air. "Zero sink" means that upward cur­ a tow by a powered aircraft. Once the sailcraft is rents are just strong enough to enable him to hold airborne and the tow cable released, performance altitude but not to climb. Sailplanes are highly 171 r efficient machines; a sink rate of a mere 2 feet per second. There is no point in trying to soar until second provides an airspeed of about 40 knots, and weather conditions favor vertical speeds greater a sink rate of 6 feet per second gives an airspeed than the minimum sink rate of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atmosphere: an Introduction to Meteorology Lutgens Tarbuck Tasa Twelfth Edition
    The Atmosphere Lutgens et al. Twelfth Edition The Atmosphere: An Introduction to Meteorology Lutgens Tarbuck Tasa Twelfth Edition ISBN 978-1-29204-229-9 9 781292 042299 ISBN 10: 1-292-04229-X ISBN 13: 978-1-292-04229-9 Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk © Pearson Education Limited 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying in the United Kingdom issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. All trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. The use of any trademark in this text does not vest in the author or publisher any trademark ownership rights in such trademarks, nor does the use of such trademarks imply any affi liation with or endorsement of this book by such owners. ISBN 10: 1-292-04229-X ISBN 10: 1-269-37450-8 ISBN 13: 978-1-292-04229-9 ISBN 13: 978-1-269-37450-7 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Printed in the United States of America Copyright_Pg_7_24.indd 1 7/29/13 11:28 AM Forms of Condensation and Precipitation TABLE 4 Types of Precipitation State of Type Approximate Size Water Description Mist 0.005–0.05 mm Liquid Droplets large enough to be felt on the face when air is moving 1 meter/second.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrail-Cirrus and Their Potential for Regional Climate Change
    Contrail-Cirrus and Their Potential for Regional Climate Change Kenneth Sassen Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah ABSTRACT After reviewing the indirect evidence for the regional climatic impact of contrail-generated cirrus clouds (contrail- cirrus), the author presents a variety of new measurements indicating the nature and scope of the problem. The assess- ment concentrates on polarization lidar and radiometric observations of persisting contrails from Salt Lake City, Utah, where an extended Project First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Program) Regional Experiment (FIRE) cirrus cloud dataset from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing has captured new information in a geographical area previously identified as being affected by relatively heavy air traffic. The following contrail properties are consid- ered: hourly and monthly frequency of occurrence; height, temperature, and relative humidity statistics; visible and in- frared radiative impacts; and microphysical content evaluated from in situ data and contrail optical phenomenon such as halos and coronas. Also presented are high-resolution lidar images of contrails from the recent SUCCESS experiment, and the results of an initial attempt to numerically simulate the radiative effects of an observed contrail. The evidence indicates that the direct radiative effects of contrails display the potential for regional climate change at many midlati- tude locations, even though the sign of the climatic impact may be uncertain. However, new information suggests that the unusually small particles typical of many persisting contrails may favor the albedo cooling over the greenhouse warming effect, depending on such factors as the geographic distribution and patterns in day versus night aircraft usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Chapter Team Response Id Page Line Page Line 2257 2 0 0 0 0 Excellent Comprehensive and Rich Report
    SROCC Second Order Draft Government and Expert Review Comments - Chapter 2 Comment Chapter From From To To Comment Chapter Team Response id page line page line 2257 2 0 0 0 0 Excellent comprehensive and rich report. I have only few rather technical remarks. A more Taken into account – sentence included in permafrost section general recommendation relates to the new landscapes which are rapidli forming in deglaciating mountain areas and need comprehensive anticipation/modeling/treatment. This is an emerging research field (Haeberli, W. (2017): Integrative modelling and managing new landscapes and environments in de-glaciating mountain ranges: An emerging trans- disciplinary research field. Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal 1(1). doi:10.15406/freij.2017.01.00005). This could be more strongly emphasized, for instance, in section 2.4 on page 47 an don page 5, line 53. Such new landscapes will be characterized by strong and long-lasting disequilibria, especially concerning slope stability, sediment cascades or eco-systems. One important factor thereby is the strongly different response time of cryosphere components: snow = almost immediate, mountain glaciers = years to decades, mountain permafrost =decades to centuries to even millennia. As an example, in many mountain chains, permafrost inside high peaks will probably continue to exist (far out of thermal equilibrium) when glaciers will have already long disappeared. [Wilfried Haeberli, Switzerland] 2259 2 0 0 0 0 The figures are interesting but rather overloaded and not easy to read and understand. Accepted - The figures have been revised to improve readability. [Wilfried Haeberli, Switzerland] 2415 2 0 0 0 It is puzzling to see that chapter authors have consciously chosen to ignore the pre- Rejected - Pre-industrial changes are not part of the government industrial, pre-Little-Ice-Age palaeoclimatic context.
    [Show full text]
  • 90001602.Pdf
    Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Prediction of human thermophysiological responses during shower Title bathing 著者 Abdul, Munir / Takada, Satoru / Matsushita, Takayuki / Kubo, Hiroko Author(s) 掲載誌・巻号・ページ International Journal of Biometeorology,54(2):165-178 Citation 刊行日 2010-03 Issue date 資源タイプ Journal Article / 学術雑誌論文 Resource Type 版区分 author Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0265-9 JaLCDOI URL http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/handle_kernel/90001602 PDF issue: 2021-09-29 PREDICTION OF HUMAN THERMOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES DURING SHOWER BATHING Abdul Munir Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia Satoru Takada Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, Rokko, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Phone: +81 78 803 6038 Fax: +81 78 803 6038 Email: [email protected] Takayuki Matsushita Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, Rokko, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Hiroko Kubo Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Human Life and Environment, Nara Women's University, Kitauoya-nishimachi, Nara 630-8506, Japan ABSTRACT This study develops a model to predict the thermophysiological response of the human body during shower bathing. Despite the needs for the quantitative evaluation of human body response during bathing for thermal comfort and safety, the complicated mechanisms of heat transfer at the skin surface, especially 1 during shower bathing, have disturbed the development of adequate models. In this study, an initial modeling approach is proposed by developing a simple heat transfer model at the skin surface during shower bathing, applied to Stolwijk’s human thermal model.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrified Shower Clouds and Their Contribution to the Global Electrical Circuit” (Liu Et
    Contribution of Thunderstorms and Shower Clouds to the Global Electric Circuit Review of “Diurnal Variations of Global Thunderstorms and Electrified Shower Clouds and Their Contribution to the Global Electrical Circuit” (Liu et. al. 2010) Kyle Chudler ATS 780 • Two main discrepancies • Amplitude of thunder days is Thunder Days and Carnegie Curve ~2 times that of Carnegie curve • Phases misaligned • Thunder Day curve max: Africa (14 – 15 UTC) • Carnegie curve max: South America (19 – 20 UTC) • Possible explanations: • Ocean not accounted for • Non-lightning producing precipitation (electrified shower clouds) • Try to use TRMM data to get a Whipple (1929) handle on both of these Methods • TRMM Precipitation Features • Groups contiguous raining pixels into one feature • Can get statistics of individual PF’s (max echo height, precipitation volume, etc.) • Divide PFs into thunderstorms, electrified shower clouds, and non-electrified • Thunderstorm: PF’s with at least one lightning flash (LIS) • Electrified Shower Cloud: , T30dBZ < -10 C over land and T30dBZ < -17 C over ocean • Only look at PF’s > 75 km2 • 75% of population, but <10% of rainfall and rain area • Compare several diurnal cycles to Carnegie curve • Rainfall • Total, On/Off Land, Thunderstorm vs Electrified Shower • Total Lightning • Contrast amplitude and phases of cycles • More PFs over Ocean (81%) than land (19%) • Thunderstorms • ~1/200 PFs • 25% of rainfall • Electrified Shower Clouds • ~1/200 PFs • 15% of rainfall Non-electrified Rainfall Dominates Ocean Diurnal Rainfall vs. Carnegie Curve • Total rainfall (black line) has similar phase, smaller amplitude • Includes ocean, which has weaker diurnal signal • Best match is land rainfall • 60% of land rainfall is from electrified storms/showers • Best amplitude match of all cycles Diurnal Rainfall vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Transformation in Supercooled Water Controls the Crystallization Rate of Ice
    Structural transformation in supercooled water controls the crystallization rate of ice. Emily B. Moore and Valeria Molinero* Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0580, USA. Contact Information for the Corresponding Author: VALERIA MOLINERO Department of Chemistry, University of Utah 315 South 1400 East, Rm 2020 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0850 Phone: (801) 585-9618; fax (801)-581-4353 Email: [email protected] 1 One of water’s unsolved puzzles is the question of what determines the lowest temperature to which it can be cooled before freezing to ice. The supercooled liquid has been probed experimentally to near the homogeneous nucleation temperature T H≈232 K, yet the mechanism of ice crystallization—including the size and structure of critical nuclei—has not yet been resolved. The heat capacity and compressibility of liquid water anomalously increase upon moving into the supercooled region according to a power law that would diverge at T s≈225 K,1,2 so there may be a link between water’s thermodynamic anomalies and the crystallization rate of ice. But probing this link is challenging because fast crystallization prevents experimental studies of the liquid below T H. And while atomistic studies have captured water crystallization3, the computational costs involved have so far prevented an assessment of the rates and mechanism involved. Here we report coarse-grained molecular simulations with the mW water model4 in the supercooled regime around T H, which reveal that a sharp increase in the fraction of four-coordinated molecules in supercooled liquid water explains its anomalous thermodynamics and also controls the rate and mechanism of ice formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Direccion De Personal Aeronautico Dpto. De
    DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO 26/09/2021 MTC DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION OGMS/DINF PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA 14:03 Pag: 1 TEMA: 0626 ATP-RTC - Meteorology and Weather Services - Chap.8 COD_PREG: PREGUNTA: RPTA: PREG20098166 What is indicated on the Weather Depiction Chart by a continuous smooth C (9299) line enclosing a hatched geographic area? OPCION A: The entire area has ceilings less than 1,000 feet and/or visibility less than 3 miles OPCION B: More than 50 percent of the area enclosed by the smooth line is predicted to have IFR conditions OPCION C: Reporting stations within the enclosed area are all showing IFR conditions at the time of the report OPCION D: PREG20098167 The horizontal wind shear, critical for turbulence (moderate or greater) per B (9701) 150 miles is OPCION A: 18 knots or less OPCION B: greater than 18 knots OPCION C: not a factor, only vertical shear is a factor OPCION D: PREG20098168 A severe thunderstorm is one in which he surface wind is A (9706) OPCION A: 50 knots or greater and/or surface hail is 3/4 inch or more in diameter. OPCION B: 55 knots or greater and/or surface hail is 1/2 inch or more in diameter. OPCION C: 45 knots or greater and/or surface hail is 1 inch or more in diameter. OPCION D: PREG20098169 A squall is a sudden increase of at least 16 knots in average wind speed to a B (9708) sustained speed of OPCION A: 24 knots or more for at least 1 minute OPCION B: 22 knots or more for at least 1 minute OPCION C: 20 knots or more for at least 1 minute OPCION D: PREG20098170 A calm wind that is forecast, in the international Terminal Aerodrome B (9709) Forecast (TAF) is encoded as OPCION A: VRB00KT OPCION B: 00000KT OPCION C: 00003KT OPCION D: PREG20098171 In the International Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF), a variable wind C (9710) direction is noted by "VRB" where the three digit direction usually appears.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Monsoon Basic Drivers and Variability
    Indian Monsoon Basic Drivers and Variability GOTHAM International Summer School PIK, Potsdam, Germany, 18-22 Sep 2017 R. Krishnan Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India The Indian (South Asian) Monsoon Tibetan Plateau India Indian Ocean Monsoon circulation and rainfall: A convectively coupled phenomenon Requires a thermal contrast between land & ocean to set up the monsoon circulation Once established, a positive feedback between circulation and latent heat release maintains the monsoon The year to year variations in the seasonal (June – September) summer monsoon rains over India are influenced internal dynamics and external drivers Long-term climatology of total rainfall over India during (1 Jun - 30 Sep) summer monsoon season (http://www.tropmet.res.in) Interannual variability of the Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall Primary synoptic & smaller scale circulation features that affect cloudiness & precipitation. Locations of June to September rainfall exceeding 100 cm over the land west of 100oE associated with the southwest monsoon are indicated (Source: Rao, 1981). Multi-scale interactions Low frequency Synoptic Systems:Lows, sub-seasonal Depressions, MTC variability – Large scale Active and monsoon Break monsoon Organized convection, Embedded mesoscale systems , heavy rainfall (intensity > 10 cm/day) Winds at 925hPa DJF West African Monsoon Asian Monsoon Austral Monsoon JJA Courtesy: J.M. Slingo, Univ of Reading Land/Sea Temperature contrasts Nov./Dec. West African Monsoon Asian Monsoon Austral Monsoon May/June Courtesy:
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation Type Graphic Documentation Page
    Precipitation Type Graphic Documentation Page Purpose: The National Weather Service in Caribou and Gray has created graphics that easily display precipitation types for mixed winter weather events. These graphics can be used by core customers for briefing purposes on upcoming winter events. Product Creation: These graphics are created automatically when each individual weather forecast office updates the official forecast. An individual forecast graphic will be created in 3 hour increments through the first 24 hours, then in 6 hour increments thereafter through 120 hours (5 days). Depending on how many forecast updates will dictate how often these graphics are created, but on average the first 24 hour forecast will be updated 6 times a day and the day 2 to 5 period will be updated twice daily (~ 3 p.m. and 3 a.m.). Product Location: Graphics will be hosted via the NWS Internet pages at the following URL: http://www.weather.gov/car/WeatherTypeCovForecast Note: The URL will be hidden for the first test season (winter 2015-16) and will only be available for a small test group to evaluate the graphics. Precipitation Type Graphic Example: The precipitation type page consists of the main graphic with the toggle commands at the bottom of the page. See image below for number reference locations: 1. Valid Time – Provides you with the graphic valid time in either 3hr or 6hr forecast time periods 2. Legend – Simple legend that explains what the precipitation type graphic colors are representing (a more detailed description of this legend is in the following section of this document).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/24/21 05:27 PM UTC Fig
    Using Citizen Science Reports to Evaluate Estimates of Surface Precipitation Type BY SHENG CHEN, JONATHAN J. GOURLEY, YANG HONG, QING CAO, NICHOLAS CARR, PIERRE-EMMANUEL KIRSTETTER, JIAN ZHANG, AND ZAC FLAMIG he Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) system tree logic. To date, there has not yet been a system- uses data from the Next Generation Radar net- atic evaluation of the MRMS surface precipitation T work (NEXRAD) combined with model analyses type products beyond case studies. An opportunity from the Rapid Refresh (RAP) system to provide pre- exists to employ newly collected citizen-scientist (also cipitation rate and type products on a grid with 1-km referred to as “crowdsourced”) reports made possible horizontal resolution every 2 min (Zhang et al. 2011). through the meteorological Phenomena Indication The model analysis fields were found to be useful for Near the Ground (mPING) project to accomplish estimating precipitation type at the surface, which algorithm evaluations (Elmore et al. 2014). differs from the various Hydrometeor Classification Human weather observers have the ability to use Algorithms (HCA) designed to identify hydrometeors multiple clues in order to make a decision about at the height of radar sampling (e.g., Park et al. 2008). a given precipitation type. They typically begin These sampled hydrometeors undergo changes in with eyesight in order to assess the fall speed of the terms of their sizes, shapes, orientation, and phase as hydrometeor, its color, size, and shape. If uncertainty they fall and reach the surface. During the cool-season remains, then they may use other observations such months, these changes often occur below the height as touch to determine its phase (liquid, frozen, or of radar sampling.
    [Show full text]