DOCSLIB.ORG

South Marine Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Draft For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Marine Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Draft For South Marine Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Appropriate Assessment Information Report Draft for consultation November 2016 DRAFT Page intentionally left blank. DRAFT MMO1112: South Marine Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Appropriate Assessment Information Report October 2015 Report prepared by: ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd DRAFT Version Author Note 0.1 PSW First draft 0.2 PSW Final 0.3 PSW Final - Policy Codes Included © Marine Management Organisation 2014 You may use and Re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo If referencing this document, please cite it as: [MMO1112South Marine Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Appropriate Assessment Information Report, October 2015 DRAFT Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Report background ............................................................................................ 8 1.2 South Marine Plan HRA process ..................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Pre-screening review ............................................................................. 11 1.2.2 Screening review ................................................................................... 11 1.2.3 Appropriate Assessment information review .......................................... 14 1.3 Report structure............................................................................................... 15 2 Assessment Approach ....................................................................................... 16 2.1 Assessment scope key considerations ............................................................ 16 2.2 Key stages of the assessment process ........................................................... 16 2.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 16 2.2.2 Step 1: Impact pathways review ............................................................ 18 2.2.3 Step 2: Identify activities to which features are sensitive ....................... 19 2.2.4 Step 3: Activity-based screening of European/Ramsar sites ................. 19 2.2.5 Step 4: Detailed pathway-feature sensitivity review ............................... 20 2.2.6 Step 5: Assessment of effects on European/Ramsar sites .................... 21 3 Assessment Results ........................................................................................... 23 3.1 Step 1: Impact pathways review ...................................................................... 23 3.1.1 Aquaculture ............................................................................................ 23 3.1.2 Beneficial re-use of sediment ................................................................. 24 3.2 Step 2: Identify activities to which features are sensitive ................................. 29 3.3 Step 3: Activity-based screening of European/Ramsar sites ........................... 29 3.4 Step 4(1): Habitat sensitivities ......................................................................... 30 3.4.1 Designated sites with habitat features ................................................... 30 3.4.2 Interest features summary list ................................................................ 31 3.4.3 Sensitivities ofDRAFT habitats to plan activities ................................................ 32 3.4.4 Physical loss/gain of habitat (loss of habitat in development footprint; impact pathway 1) ................................................................................. 32 3.4.5 Physical damage (direct, indirect and temporary damage to habitat; impact pathways 2 and 4) ...................................................................... 33 3.4.6 Toxic contamination (reduction in water quality; impact pathways 11 to 14) ..................................................................................................... 34 3.4.7 Non-toxic contamination (elevated turbidity; impact pathway 15) .......... 35 3.4.8 Biological disturbance (direct and indirect introduction of non-native species, translocation of native species, and introduction/transfer of parasites/pathogens ; impact pathways 16 to 20) ................................. 36 3.4.9 Habitat interest features ......................................................................... 37 3.5 Step 4(2): Bird sensitivities .............................................................................. 43 3.5.1 Designated sites with bird features ........................................................ 43 AAIR Page 1 of 225 3.5.2 Interest features summary list ................................................................ 43 3.5.3 Sensitivities of birds to plan activities ..................................................... 44 3.5.4 Physical damage to habitat (Indirect change to habitat; impact pathway 3) ............................................................................................. 45 3.5.5 Physical damage to species (direct damage to species from collision risk; impact pathway 6) .......................................................................... 46 3.5.6 Physical damage to species (direct damage to species from marine litter; impact pathway 7) ......................................................................... 47 3.5.7 Non-physical disturbance to species (visual/noise disturbance; impact pathways 9 and 10) ............................................................................... 47 3.5.8 Toxic Contamination (spillage and contamination; impact pathways 11 to 14) ................................................................................................ 50 3.5.9 Non-toxic contamination (increased turbidity; impact pathway 15) ........ 50 3.5.10 Bird interest features ............................................................................ 51 3.6 Step 4(3): Marine mammal sensitivities ........................................................... 52 3.6.1 Designated sites with marine mammal features..................................... 52 3.6.2 Interest features summary list ................................................................ 52 3.6.3 Sensitivities of marine mammals to plan activities ................................. 53 3.6.4 Physical Damage (indirect change to habitat; impact pathway 3) .......... 53 3.6.5 Physical Damage to Species (damage to seal haul-outs; impact pathway 5) ............................................................................................. 54 3.6.6 Physical Damage to Species (direct damage to species from collision risk; impact pathway 6) .......................................................................... 54 3.6.7 Physical Damage (direct damage to species from marine litter; impact pathway 7) ............................................................................................. 56 3.6.8 Non-Physical Disturbance (noise/vibration and visual disturbance causing barrier and exclusion effects; impact pathways 8 to10) ............ 56 3.6.9 Toxic Contamination (reduction in water quality; impact pathways 11 to 14) ..................................................................................................... 61 3.6.10 Non-Toxic Contamination (elevated turbidity; impact pathway 15) ...... 62 3.6.11 Marine mammalDRAFT interest features ......................................................... 62 3.7 Step 4(4): Fish and freshwater pearl mussel sensitivities ................................ 65 3.7.1 Designated sites with fish and freshwater pearl mussel features ........... 65 3.7.2 Interest features summary list ................................................................ 65 3.7.3 Sensitivities of fish and freshwater pearl mussels to plan activities ....... 66 3.7.4 Physical damage (indirect change to habitat; impact pathway 3) .......... 66 3.7.5 Physical damage (direct damage to species from collision risk; impact pathway 6 .............................................................................................. 68 3.7.6 Physical damage (direct damage to species from marine litter; impact pathway 7) ............................................................................................. 69 3.7.7 Non-physical disturbance (barrier and disturbance to species; impact pathways 8 and 10) ............................................................................... 69 3.7.8 Toxic contamination (reduction in water quality; impact pathways 11 to 14) ..................................................................................................... 71 AAIR Page 2 of 225 3.7.9 Non-toxic contamination (elevated turbidity; impact pathway 15) .......... 72 3.7.10 Biological disturbance (introduction of non-native species and the transfer of parasite and pathogens; impact pathways 17 and 20) ......... 73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 Habitats Regulation Assessment
    South West river basin district Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 Habitats Regulation Assessment March 2016 Executive summary The Flood Risk Management Plan (FRMP) for the South West River Basin District (RBD) provides an overview of the range of flood risks from different sources across the 9 catchments of the RBD. The RBD catchments are defined in the River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) and based on the natural configuration of bodies of water (rivers, estuaries, lakes etc.). The FRMP provides a range of objectives and programmes of measures identified to address risks from all flood sources. These are drawn from the many risk management authority plans already in place but also include a range of further strategic developments for the FRMP ‘cycle’ period of 2015 to 2021. The total numbers of measures for the South West RBD FRMP are reported under the following types of flood management action: Types of flood management measures % of RBD measures Prevention – e.g. land use policy, relocating people at risk etc. 21 % Protection – e.g. various forms of asset or property-based protection 54% Preparedness – e.g. awareness raising, forecasting and warnings 21% Recovery and review – e.g. the ‘after care’ from flood events 1% Other – any actions not able to be categorised yet 3% The purpose of the HRA is to report on the likely effects of the FRMP on the network of sites that are internationally designated for nature conservation (European sites), and the HRA has been carried out at the level of detail of the plan. Many measures do not have any expected physical effects on the ground, and have been screened out of consideration including most of the measures under the categories of Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery and Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appeal Decision Site visit made on 4 April 2012 by John Woolcock BNatRes(Hons) MURP DipLaw MPIA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 4 July 2012 Appeal Ref: APP/D0840/A/11/2162570 Treworgans, Cubert, near Newquay, Cornwall • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Simon Allen against the decision of Cornwall Council. • The application No:NR/10/00063/WIND, dated 2 March 2010, was refused by notice dated 19 August 2011. • The development proposed is the erection of a single wind turbine, standing not more than 53.7 m to tip, ancillary infrastructure and grid connection work near Cubert, Cornwall. Decision 1. I dismiss the appeal. Preliminary matters 2. The scheme proposes a 200 kW to 350 kW turbine. 1 The make and model is not specified, but it would have a tower height of up to 37 m and a rotor diameter of up to 33.4 m, giving a maximum height of 53.7 m to blade tip. Grid connection is proposed via an underground link to an existing 11 kV electrical pole located towards the western end of the land edged blue on the application plans, which is in the control of the appellant. 3. A unilateral planning obligation, dated 24 January 2012, provides for a financial contribution to a community beneficiary for twenty years following commencement of the development that is the subject of this appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • CORNWALL Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph CORNWALL Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No Parish Location Position CW_BFST16 SS 26245 16619 A39 MORWENSTOW Woolley, just S of Bradworthy turn low down on verge between two turns of staggered crossroads CW_BFST17 SS 25545 15308 A39 MORWENSTOW Crimp just S of staggered crossroads, against a low Cornish hedge CW_BFST18 SS 25687 13762 A39 KILKHAMPTON N of Stursdon Cross set back against Cornish hedge CW_BFST19 SS 26016 12222 A39 KILKHAMPTON Taylors Cross, N of Kilkhampton in lay-by in front of bungalow CW_BFST20 SS 25072 10944 A39 KILKHAMPTON just S of 30mph sign in bank, in front of modern house CW_BFST21 SS 24287 09609 A39 KILKHAMPTON Barnacott, lay-by (the old road) leaning to left at 45 degrees CW_BFST22 SS 23641 08203 UC road STRATTON Bush, cutting on old road over Hunthill set into bank on climb CW_BLBM02 SX 10301 70462 A30 CARDINHAM Cardinham Downs, Blisland jct, eastbound carriageway on the verge CW_BMBL02 SX 09143 69785 UC road HELLAND Racecourse Downs, S of Norton Cottage drive on opp side on bank CW_BMBL03 SX 08838 71505 UC road HELLAND Coldrenick, on bank in front of ditch difficult to read, no paint CW_BMBL04 SX 08963 72960 UC road BLISLAND opp. Tresarrett hamlet sign against bank. Covered in ivy (2003) CW_BMCM03 SX 04657 70474 B3266 EGLOSHAYLE 100m N of Higher Lodge on bend, in bank CW_BMCM04 SX 05520 71655 B3266 ST MABYN Hellandbridge turning on the verge by sign CW_BMCM06 SX 06595 74538 B3266 ST TUDY 210 m SW of Bravery on the verge CW_BMCM06b SX 06478 74707 UC road ST TUDY Tresquare, 220m W of Bravery, on climb, S of bend and T junction on the verge CW_BMCM07 SX 0727 7592 B3266 ST TUDY on crossroads near Tregooden; 400m NE of Tregooden opp.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management
    Appendix A - Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has overall responsibility for flood risk management in England. Their aim is to reduce flood risk by: • discouraging inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. • encouraging adequate and cost effective flood warning systems. • encouraging adequate technically, environmentally and economically sound and sustainable flood defence measures. The Government’s Foresight Programme has recently produced a report called Future Flooding, which warns that the risk of flooding will increase between 2 and 20 times over the next 75 years. The report produced by the Office of Science and Technology has a long-term vision for the future (2030 – 2100), helping to make sure that effective strategies are developed now. Sir David King, the Chief Scientific Advisor to the Government concluded: “continuing with existing policies is not an option – in virtually every scenario considered (for climate change), the risks grow to unacceptable levels. Secondly, the risk needs to be tackled across a broad front. However, this is unlikely to be sufficient in itself. Hard choices need to be taken – we must either invest in more sustainable approaches to flood and coastal management or learn to live with increasing flooding”. In response to this, Defra is leading the development of a new strategy for flood and coastal erosion for the next 20 years. This programme, called “Making Space for Water” will help define and set the agenda for the Government’s future strategic approach to flood risk. Within this strategy there will be an overall approach to the assessing options through a strong and continuing commitment to CFMPs and SMPs within a broader planning framework which will include River Basin Management Plans prepared under the Water Framework Directive and Integrated Coastal Zone Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report
    Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC July 2020 Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Project Number 11113 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for client comment K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 26.06.2020 2. Final for consultation K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 07.07.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8UL Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background to the Local Plan 1 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 2 Stages of HRA 2 Recent case law changes 4 Previous HRA work 5 Structure of this report 5 Chapter 2 Approach to HRA 6 Screening methodology 6 Appropriate Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Scope of HRA 11 European sites that may be affected by the Local Plan 11 Potential broad impacts from the Local Plan 18 Chapter 4 Next Steps 21 Appendix A Attributes of European Sites with the potential to be affected by the Local Plan A-1 Appendix B Other plans and projects with the potential for in-combination effects B-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction An introduction to Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Winchester District Local Plan LUC has been commissioned by Winchester City Council to carry out a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of its emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 120. Wealden Greensand Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornwall & Isles of Scilly Landscape Character Study
    CORNWALL AND ISLES OF SCILLY LANDSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY Overview and Technical Report Final Report May 2007 Forward The Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Landscape Character Study 2005-2007 has been developed as a joint project between the local authorities in Cornwall, the National Trust and the AONB units of Cornwall, the Tamar Valley and the Isles of Scilly supported by the Countryside Agency (now Natural England). Diacono Associates in conjunction with White Consultants were appointed in 2005 to undertake a Landscape Character Assessment for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. This updates the Cornwall Landscape Assessment published in 1994. This report sets out the methodology by which Landscape Character Areas have been identified, based on Landscape Description Units, and brings together the main findings of the study including the initial consultation stages. Part of the study included an assessment of landscape sensitivity at the level of the Landscape Description Units. This aspect of the study is however to be the subject of further investigation and the findings set out in this report have not therefore been endorsed at this stage by the participating organisations. This report will form the basis of a number of areas of further research and investigation including landscape sensitivity, and seascape assessment as well as the further consultation on the draft Landscape Character Area Descriptions. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Landscape Character Study 2005-2007 Project Management Group Oct 2007 Final Report Cornwall and the Isles of
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. What Internationally Designated Nature Conservation Sites Lie Close to My Airport?
    APPENDIX C. WHAT INTERNATIONALLY DESIGNATED NATURE CONSERVATION SITES LIE CLOSE TO MY AIRPORT? This appendix shows maps of English airports and their nearest European sites (Special Protection Areas, Special Areas of Conservation and Ramsar sites). The airports are in alphabetical order. The appendix is based on Natural England’s interactive mappipng website Nature on the Map . Unfortunately, no similar websites exists for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland. The maps suggest that, based on distance to the European site alone , the following airports have the greatest potential to affect the integrity of European sites: • Blackpool • Bournemouth • Heathrow • Liverpool John Lennon • Lydd / Ashford • Southampton and to a lesser extent: • Manston / Kent • Southend. The information in this document is to the best of our knowledge, but we strongly recommend that you use Nature on the Map to confirm details for ‘your’ airport. The integrity of many of the European sites within 15km of an airport will not be affected by airport development; and conversely some sites further away than 15km from an airport might be affected by development at that airport. Please contact AEF if you have more up to date information, or information on other airports/airfields and would like us to include it in this file. C-1 Alconbury SACs/SPAS/Ramsar sites within 15km radius • Portholme (SAC) • Fenland (SAC) • Woodwalton Fen (Ramsar) C-2 Biggin Hill SACs/SPAS/Ramsar sites within 15km radius • Wimbledon Common (SAC) • Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment (SAC) C-3 Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersed Distribution
    Lundy Tintagel-Marsland-Clovelly Coast NOTES Cornwall UA/Core Strategy Area Option 2 - Dispersed Distribution 5km Buffer of Cornwall UA Special Protection Areas (SPAs) This option proposes a more dispersed pattern of growth throughout Cornwall with a much greater focus Culm Grasslands Special Areas of Conservation SACs) on small market villages, or 'clusters' of villages that are important to local areas Candidate SACs Railway Primary road Culm Grasslands Existing Ferry Ports Existing Main Airport Bude/Stratton/Poughhill Tintagel-Marsland-Clovelly Coast Culm Grasslands d x m . s n o i t Dartmoor u b South Dartmoor Woods i r Launceston t s Crowdy Marsh i D d e Dartmoor s r e p s i D - Copyright 2 n o i Contains Ordnance Survey Data © t p South Dartmoor Crown Copyright and database right 2011 O s River Camel Woods e South Dartmoor Woods t i Phoenix United Mine & Crow's Nest © Natural England material is reproduced S with the permission of Natural England 2011 d Wadebridge e t a n South Dartmoor Settlement Options Source: Cornwall Council g i Breney Common and s e Goss & Tregoss Moors Woods Dartmoor D Bodmin n a e p Liskeard o r u E Tamar Estuaries Complex Breney Common and - 5 Goss & Tregoss Moors e r u g Newquay i Saltash F \ s Penhale Dunes D St Austell Clay Pits X M \ S I Plymouth Sound & Estuaries Revision Details By Date Suffix G Polruan to Polperro c Newlyn Downs Check r A \ Drawing Status l l St Austell Blackstone Point a Godrevy Head to St Agnes w DRAFT n r o Job Title C f o Carrine Common A Prawle Point to Plymouth Sound & Eddystone
    [Show full text]
  • Edited by IJ Bennallick & DA Pearman
    BOTANICAL CORNWALL 2010 No. 14 Edited by I.J. Bennallick & D.A. Pearman BOTANICAL CORNWALL No. 14 Edited by I.J.Bennallick & D.A.Pearman ISSN 1364 - 4335 © I.J. Bennallick & D.A. Pearman 2010 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. Published by - the Environmental Records Centre for Cornwall & the Isles of Scilly (ERCCIS) based at the- Cornwall Wildlife Trust Five Acres, Allet, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 9DJ Tel: (01872) 273939 Fax: (01872) 225476 Website: www.erccis.co.uk and www.cornwallwildlifetrust.org.uk Cover photo: Perennial Centaury Centaurium scilloides at Gwennap Head, 2010. © I J Bennallick 2 Contents Introduction - I. J. Bennallick & D. A. Pearman 4 A new dandelion - Taraxacum ronae - and its distribution in Cornwall - L. J. Margetts 5 Recording in Cornwall 2006 to 2009 – C. N. French 9 Fitch‟s Illustrations of the British Flora – C. N. French 15 Important Plant Areas – C. N. French 17 The decline of Illecebrum verticillatum – D. A. Pearman 22 Bryological Field Meetings 2006 – 2007 – N. de Sausmarez 29 Centaurium scilloides, Juncus subnodulosus and Phegopteris connectilis rediscovered in Cornwall after many years – I. J. Bennallick 36 Plant records for Cornwall up to September 2009 – I. J. Bennallick 43 Plant records and update from the Isles of Scilly 2006 – 2009 – R. E. Parslow 93 3 Introduction We can only apologise for the very long gestation of this number. There is so much going on in the Cornwall botanical world – a New Red Data Book, an imminent Fern Atlas, plans for a new Flora and a Rare Plant Register, plus masses of fieldwork, most notably for Natural England for rare plants on SSSIs, that somehow this publication has kept on being put back as other more urgent tasks vie for precedence.
    [Show full text]
  • Arun and Western Streams Abstraction Licensing Strategy
    Arun and Western Streams Abstraction Licensing Strategy A strategy to manage water resources sustainably Version 3 March 2019 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment. We help people and wildlife adapt to climate change and reduce its impacts, including flooding, drought, sea level rise and coastal erosion. We improve the quality of our water, land and air by tackling pollution. We work with businesses to help them comply with environmental regulations. A healthy and diverse environment enhances people's lives and contributes to economic growth. We can’t do this alone. We work as part of the Defra group (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs), with the rest of government, local councils, businesses, civil society groups and local communities to create a better place for people and wildlife. Published by: © Environment Agency 2018 Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be Horizon House, Deanery Road, reproduced with prior permission of the Bristol BS1 5AH Environment Agency. www.gov.uk/environment-agency Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications or our National Customer Contact Centre: 03708 506 506 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk 2 of 25 Contents 1. About the licensing strategy ......................................................................................... 4 2. Water resource availability of the Arun and Western Streams ALS .......................... 4 2.1. Resource availability .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]