Aesthetic Separation and the Reflection of Life in Art
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Aesthetic Separation and the Reflection of Life in Art Robert Waters Concepción Elorza Ibañez de Gauna Department of Art and Technology University of the Basque Country September 2019. (cc)2019 ROBERT JAMES WATERS (cc by-nc 4.0) 2 Published by Reprografía at the University of the Basque Country in Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain. Citation Style: Turabian / Chicago, Font: Times New Roman. Pages: 217, Word Count: 125 505. Cover image: Robert Waters, The Essential Elements of Aesthetic Experience, 2019, digitally manipulated paper collage (detail), 29.7 x 21 cm. © Robert Waters 2019 www.robertwaters.ca 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADMINISTATIVE DOCUMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………..…………………..…………………...p. 7 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO AESTHETIC SEPARATION…………………..p. 9 1.1. Introduction to Introduction to Aesthetic Separation 1.2. Thesis Topic and Intentions 1.3. Literature Review 1.4. Terms and Scope of the Thesis Topic 1.5. Thesis Positioning and Literature Evaluation 1.6. Importance and Contribution of the Thesis 1.7. Epistemological and Ontological Position 1.8. Research Questions 1.9. Hypothesis 1.10. Thesis Limitations 1.11. Methodology 1.12. Main Findings 1.13. Thesis Layout 1.14. Acknowledgements CHAPTER 2. LIFE / CONTEXT………………………………………………………..p. 31 2.1. Introduction to Life / Context 2.2. Autopoiesis 2.2.1. Introduction to Autopoiesis 2.2.2. Two Laws of Autopoiesis 2.2.3. Two Conditions of Autopoiesis 2.2.4. Molecular and Molar Domains 2.2.5. Cognition 2.2.6. Observation 2.2.7. Perspective & Difference 2.2.8. Lack, Desire & Intentionality 2.2.9. The Conatus 2.2.10. Conclusion to Autopoiesis 2.3. Autopoieitic & Aesthetic Operation 2.3.1. Introduction to Autopoieitic & Aesthetic Operation 2.3.2. Transformation 2.3.3. Organization 2.3.4. Context 2.3.5. Observation 2.3.6. Time 2.3.7. Difference 2.3.8. Lack 2.3.9. Coordination 2.3.10. Conclusion to Autopoieitic & Aesthetic Operation 2.4. Conclusion to Life / Context CHAPTER 3. THOUGHT / SELF……………………………………………………..p. 123 3.1. Introduction to Thought / Self 4 3.2. The Self 3.2.1. Introduction to The Self 3.2.2. Parallelism 3.2.3. Thought 3.2.4. Ipseity 3.2.5. Conclusion to The Self 3.3. Perception and Experience 3.3.1. Introduction to Perception and Experience 3.3.2. Perception 3.3.3. Enaction 3.3.4. Experience 3.3.5. Conclusion to Perception and Experience 3.4. Consciousness 3.4.1. Introduction to Consciousness 3.4.2. Consciousness 3.4.3. Umwelt 3.4.4. The Open 3.4.5. Conclusion to Consciousness 3.5. Conclusion to Thought / Self CHAPTER 4. HUMAN BEINGS / INTENTION……………………………………..p. 163 4.1. Introduction to Human Beings / Intention 4.2. Language 4.2.1. Introduction to Language 4.2.2. Speech 4.2.2.1. To Name 4.2.2.2. To Respond 4.2.3. Subjects 4.2.3.1. The Bio-political Subject 4.2.3.2. The Legal Subject 4.2.3.2. Subject of the Signifier 4.2.4. Writing 4.2.4.1. Mute Speech 4.2.4.2. Mark-Making 4.2.5. Conclusion to Language 4.3. Technology 4.2.1. Introduction to Technology 4.2.2. Reorganization 4.2.3. Progression 4.2.4. Function 4.2.5. Conclusion to Technology 4.4. Conclusion to Human Beings / Intention CHAPTER 5. ARTWORKS / ART…………………………………………………….p. 253 5.1. Introduction to Artworks / Art 5.2. The Parergon 5.2.1. Introduction to The Parergon 5.2.2. Summary – The Critique of Judgement, Analytic of the Beautiful 5.2.3. Description – The Parergon 5.2.4. Order 5 5.2.5. Position 5.2.6. Form 5.2.7. Conclusion to The Parergon 5.3. ‘The Fragment’ 5.3.1. Introduction to ‘The Fragment’ 5.3.2. Description – ‘The Fragment’ 5.3.3. Autonomy 5.3.4. Contemporary / Postconceptual Art 5.3.5. Series & Projects 5.3.6. Conclusion to ‘The Fragment’ 5.4. Conclusion to Artworks / Art CHAPTER 6. PRACTICAL RESEARCH …………………………………………….p. 319 6.1. Introduction to Practical Research 6.2. Changing Matter, Changing Minds 6.2.1. The Transformative Potential of Art 6.2.2. Uncover RECOVER 6.2.3. Artworks and Politics 6.3. Cover Your Tracks 6.3.1. Introduction to Cover Your Tracks 6.3.2. Project Description 6.3.2.1. Physical and Ideological Summary 6.3.2.2. Formal Description 6.3.2.3. Experiential Description 6.3.3. Theoretical Contextualization 6.3.3.1. Life / Context 6.3.3.2. Thought / Self 6.3.3.3. Human Beings / Intention 6.3.3.4. Artworks / Art 6.3.4. Conclusion to Cover Your Tracks 6.4. Evaluation of Practical Research 6.5. Conclusion to Practical Research CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSIONS…………………..…………………..………………...p. 373 7.1. Discussion 7.1.1. Key Findings 7.1.2. Interpretations 7.1.3. Implications 7.2. Conclusions 7.2.1. Answers to the Main Research Questions…………………………………p. 378 7.2.2. Recommendations for Future Research 7.2.3. New Contribution of Knowledge APPENDIX 1. Resumen en castellano (Thesis Summary in Spanish)….…...…………..p. 399 APPENDIX 2. Timeline of Referenced Periods and Source Material…………….……..p. 408 APPENDIX 3. Aesthetic Separation Collage………………..…………………………..p. 410 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………..…………………..…………………..…………...p. 411 6 7 ABSTRACT1 – Aesthetic Separation and the Reflection of Life in Art This thesis aims to define the practice of art, which is understood as the creation and appreciation of artworks, in terms of separation. It further attempts to determine how the concept of separation can be used to relate biological and cognitive aspects of human life with the aesthetic experience and understanding of artworks. It accomplishes this by establishing correlations between biological and artistic functionality, while showing how separation limits a purely biological conception of artistic practice. The theoretical research focuses on important aesthetic theories of the past two centuries, and recent studies into human cognition. The practical research incorporates two postconceptual social art projects that implicate the theoretical research. The results demonstrate two principal separations that define artworks and people in relation to tradition and society respectively. The first involves an internal division of object and subject, or material and form. The second distinguishes internal from external, integral from relational, or the individual from the group. The oppositions that are generated by these separations play vital roles in the reflexive identification of self—the foundation of aesthetic theory—and the recognition of human products as artworks. Nonetheless, this thesis finds that the distinct sources of internal and external meaning during aesthetic experience impede a direct correlation between artistic cause and biological effect, and vice versa. Artworks do reflect human life, but their capacity to produce meaning is influenced by social and conceptual relations that escape biological determinism. The practice of art distinguishes its autonomy and tradition on its own terms. Keywords: aesthetics; art; artwork; biology; cognition; life; postconceptual; separation; tradition. 1 Ve a APÉNDICE 1 en página 399 para el RESUMEN en castellano. 8 “Separation is the Alpha and Omega of the Spectacle.” – Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle, Thesis 25. 9 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introduction to the Introduction This thesis employs the concept of separation to determine how the practice of art relates to biological and philosophical conceptions of life. It explores the observation and function of separation in both artworks and people through an exploration of autopoietic theory, human cognition and aesthetic experience. It expands upon Jacques Rancière’s conception of ‘aesthetic separation,’ which involves two distinct divisions that consider artworks in relation to sensory interaction leading to signification, and cultural tradition in relation to social transformation. Artworks are thus contemplated in my research in terms of artistic practice—the creation and appreciation of art—and in relation to collective systems of cultural communication and preservation. This thesis explores the practice of art from many angles, providing a holistic approach to understanding the creation of artworks and their reception through aesthetic experience at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In order to better understand the connection between art and life, the practice of art is considered in terms of a systems- theoretical approach to biological operation, and a cognitive embodiment approach of human thought. To better understand the relationship between singular artworks and the general concept of art—as well as the social tradition through which art exists—the theory of art is considered in relation to its ontological and art historical roots. For my practical research, the ideas encountered in the scientific and philosophical research are integrated into an social artwork that explores how context influences artistic significance, and how spectators participate to help create artworks. My research questions the procedure of identifying contemporary artworks given that they are unlimited in terms of their material composition and subject matter, and increasingly 10 moving into non-art territories. My belief is that artworks are distinguished from non-natural materials and non-art products based on the observation of their compositions and contextual states, which must incorporate some artistic convention that will distinguish them as art. This research also questions the ways that artworks affect observers, and how the practice of art can have a political effect. This relates to Rancière’s concept of aesthetic separation, which he uses to explore the potential and limits of the political efficacy of aesthetic experience. This thesis finds that the concept of separation is a valuable way to appreciate the practice of art and relate it to human life. Our biological state of being separated in terms of physiological lack and psychological ipseity can be recognized as an impetus for the acts of communication and connection that artistic practice implies. The observational act of distinction, which is required during aesthetic experience, is also an act of separation in which the transformations inherent in artistic composition are internalized and understood in relation to preconceptions of the concept and tradition of art.