DOCSLIB.ORG

Wet Mountains, Colorado, T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wet Mountains, Colorado, T (aoo) -(G rt r- {/)((). 361 ~ ­ ~ Wet Mountains, Colorado, T ·~ 52-19,54 By R. Ao Christman, M. R. Brock, R. C. Pearson, and Q. D, .~ingewald "ft / . y ~ '. i· .· .f\ t ./~- t~>· ' ~} ; .': l . \.___,/! I -· .. • . .;4'· lt '•' - ,. ;J;/~' ,. ;.- t: ~;· ~~: . __ /~ 'j\(1_. Trace Elements ln'Vestigations Report 354 UNITED STATES DEPARTME ~f t ' OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0 FFICIAL USE ONLY Geology and Mineralogy This document consists of 52 pages, plus 2 figures., Series A UNRTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WET MOUNTAINS . COLORADO, THORIUM INVESTIGATIONS, 1952-1954* By R, A, Ct.ud.stma.n, M .. R.. Brock, R. C. Pearson, and Q~ Dw Singewald August 1954 .Trac,e Elemenb; Investigations Report 354 {J~. ~ ~o/ GS-/7?~/?1.&-J'/_,- ~~~ ~ )~ .3"4//.r..r: This prelimmary .report is distributed without editorial and technical review for conformity with official standards and nomenclatureo It is not fOJC public inspection or quotation.. *This report concerns work done on behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U. s. Atomic Energy Commission., When separated from Part U, handle Part I as UNCLASSIFffiD· OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3 CONTENTS Page Abstract. 5 Introduction • 6 Summary of the geology. 8 Regional se~ting • 8 General geology • 8 Alluvium.,-talus. anti soil • 10 Rocks 10 Individual rock types • 10 Metasedi,mentary gneisses. 11 '· Hornblende ... plagiodase gneiss and hornblenae..:pyroxen~~pl~gid"Clase _ gne~s. 12 Biotite-quartz-plagioclase gneiss ' 13 Pyroxene-scapolite gneiss • 15 Quartzite • 15 Sillimanitic gneisses • 15 Garnetiferous gneisses 16 Granitic gneisses of unknown origin • 16 Migmatite. 17 Quartz monzonite gneiss 17 Alaskitic granite gneiss • 18 Leuco-granodiorite gneiss • 19 Igneous arid other rocks. 21 Metamorphosed gal;>broic and ultramafic rocks, 21 Pegmatite. 22 Breccia. 22 Albite ;syenite 23 Altered rock • 26 Dike rocks. 26 Bedrock map units .• 28 Geologic structure • 29 Foliation and lineation 29 Folds ,. 30 Fractu~es. 33 Mineral dep0sits. 35 Description of veins. 36 1'hoduti1 deposits. · 37 Batite deposits, 45 Ve.rmiculite deposits 45 Thor~um deposits outside the mapped area " 45 Suggestions for prospecting • 48 Literature cited • 5.0 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figur~ 1. Index map of Wet Mountain area, Coloradoc ., 7 2. Geolp:gic map of the McKinley M~lilntain area. Wet Mountains. Colorado {2 maps: east half and west haif) ,. ., • • • • .. • • • • • • .. In envelope 3. Index map of localities of radioactive material. McKinley Mountain area. Wet Mountains. Colorado (2 maps: east half and west half). .. • • • • " c In envelope 4. Diagrams showing trends of veins and dikes. McKinley Mountain area. Colorado • 34 5. Map of known thorium deposits in parts of Custer and Fremont Counties. Colorado. excluding the McKinley Mountain area • .• • • • • • • • • • 42 TABLES Table 1. Modes (volume percent) of hornblende-plagioclase gneiss and hornblende­ pyroxene-plagioclase gneiss • • ., ., .. • • • .. • • ., .. • • .. 14 2. Modes (volume percent) of alaskitic granite gneiss 20 3. Selected analyses of albite syenite sto~k and syJnite dike. • • c. i!> • ., 0 25 4. Analyses of samples from the McKinley Mountain area. Custer and Fremont C.ountieso Coloraao • .. ., .. • • • • • • .. • 38 5• . Previously reported analyses from the McKinley Mountain area. Custer and Fremont Counties. Colorado .. • • • • • .. • • • • • • .. ., • 39 6. Analyses of the thorUe-like mineral fll'ont Pi.ne Ttee clainio C11$tei County. Colora_do .. • w. • c c. • . _ • 'Q • _9 v. o • C! ~ "' s • • ~ • 44 '1. Analyses of samples from outside the McKinley Mountain area. Custer and Fremont Counties. Colorado • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • ., .. 47 5 WET MOUNTAlNS 0 COLORAD0 0 THORXUM INVESTIGATIONS 1952-1_9.54 ~yR., A, Christ'triitlli~ · M.. R. Brock. R., C., Pea.Jl'SOtll0 and Q., D. Singewald ABSTRACT A 22-square mile tract (McKinley Mountain area) of pre~Cambrian rocks and veins containing thorium was mapped at the scale of 1:6. 000., This tract lies on the west flank of the Wet Mountains. Custer and . Fremont Counties. northeast of Westcliffe. Coloo ~he bedrock is a complexly interlayered sequence of gneisses of metasedimentary origin. migmatite and granitic gneisses that have been transected by an albite syenite stock and numerous northwest-trending dikes. veins. and fractures., Homblende~plagioclase and bioti te~ qua rt z~p l agioclase gneisses are the principal metasedimentary rocks; pyr o xen e~scapolite. gamet. sillimanite. and quartzitte zones are locally present. The most prominent rock is a poorly foliated. micmcline. alaskitic granite gneiss which occurs as layers ranging from more than 500 feet in thickness down to migmatitic " lit-par~ lit" type of injections less than an inch thick. Of less wide distdbution. but of similar occurrence. are quartz monzonite and leuco-granodiorite gneisses. Although the foliation of the rocks generally is steep and trends northeast over most of the area. several nonheast~uending folds have bee!J\ mapped in the northem half of the area; , a vert,ically plunging fold occurs in the southwest. The albite syenite is nonfoliated and is about 59'& million years old (late pre-Cambrian) by the Larsen zircon method of age determination., Many of the dikes are related to the stock., More than 800 radioactive occurrences were found along the northwest~trending veins., Almost all the radioactivity is due to thorium which in its purest form occurs as a hydrated thorite~Iike mineral. The veins also contain carbonate minerals. ba rite~ quartz. red and yeHow iron oxides. and minor sulfides; no genetic relation of these minerals to the thorium has been established.. Although most of the deposits .are only weakly radioactive. richer concentiration:; are scattered as pockets and lenses along the veins. INTRODUCTION Du'ring the summers of 1952 and 1953 geologic mapping at a scale of 1:6~ 000 was done in an area. designated in this report as the McKinley Mountain area. about 10 miles northeast of Westcliffe on the western flank of the Wet Mountains in Custer .and Fremont ~ounties. Colo.. (fig., 1). The pre~Cambrian complex of igneous and metamorphic bedrdGk was mapped in great detail (fig. 2) in order to discover new vein-thorium deposits and to determine the structural setting of these deposits., More than 800 radioactive localities were found (fig. 3) within the 22 square miles that were mapped. The deposits occur irregularly atong northwest trending fraetttres without apparent relation..either to the country rock or to changes in strike of the fractures. Previous work in the McKinley Mountain area consislted of reconnai$sance of a few of the thorium deposits and a plane table map of a small tract at the Tuttle ranch., This worko as well as descriptions of some other thorium deposits and of a drilling program at Hapu1ta ranch. is set forth in "Thorium investigations. 1950-52. Wet Mountains. Coknado"' by Christman. Heyman. Dell wig and Gott (1953). The 1953 report outlined the known thorium province as at least 20 miles long and 10 miles wide • .It now is known to b~ at least 30 miles long and 12 miles wide~ To the southwest the Rosita and Silver Cliff mining dlstricts. containing silvero lead. goldg zinc. and copper veins associated with Tertiary volcanic rocks. have been described by S., F., Emmons ( 1896). and Cmss (1896). About two~thirds of the work by the U., s. Geological Survey was done on behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U. s. Atomic Energy Commission; the remainder was done by the State of Colo.rado Geological Survey Board and the Geological Survey on a cooperative basis. This report was .- prepared by Christman. Brock 9 and Pea.rson. under the general supervision of Singewald. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TRACE ELEMENTS INVESTIGATIONS UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT 354 CITY _.., DENVER • COL 0 R AD 0 Canon City .Pue~lo /----J 0 ~ ~ FIGURE I.-INDEX MAP OF WET MOUNTAIN AREA, COLORADO. : ~ ~ 8 SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY Regional setting The pre-Cambrian rocks in the McKinley Mountain area are part of a north-trending belt of gneisses. schists, and granites which are exposed as a result of the Wet Mountain uplift during the Laramide revo­ lution. This belt is the southward~ echelon extention of the ancient Front Range highland (Lovering and Goddard. 1950). Most of the belt lies east of the mapped area and forms the higher portions of the Wet Mountains. Just east of the mapped area is the northwest -trending llse fault which apparently represents a structural break between the northeast-trending rocks in the McKinley Mountain area and the rocks on the crest of the Wet. Mountains. Most of the area is fairly rugged; relief ranges from 7. 900 to 9. aOO feet~ Water is scarce. Rather thin. somewhat scrubby stand~ of evergreen cover most of the ridges. but good stands cover some of the north slopes. West and southwest of the mapped area a discontinuous belt of Tertiary volcanic rocks lies between the pre-Cambrian rocks on the east and the alluvial fill in the Wet Mountain Valley on the west., F~rther to the west fire the high Sangre de Cristo Mountains composed of folded Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and several small Tertiary-intrusions (Burbank and Goddard. 1937)~ Associated with the Tertiary volcanic .roc_ks are vein depo.sits of gold. silver. lead. zinc 0 and copper near Rosita. Silver Cliff. Querida. and Westcliffe. Although one of the volcanic bodies near Hillside is slightly radioactive. Tertiary minerali­ zation appears unrelated to the thorium deposits in the pre-Cambrian rocksQ General geology The bedrock consists of metasedimentary. migmatitic. and granitic; gneisses which form complex interlayered sequences of interfingering and gradational rock types (fig. 2). Except along the crests and troughs of several folds, ·the layers of gneiss dip steeply and form narrow bands which trend northeast across the area. Distinctive lithologic "marker beds" in some places are important aids in determining the geologic structure. Units of homblende~plagioclase gneiss. biotite~qua.r~z:,P.lagjoclas :e , g_neiSsp and- undi~ided metasedimentary gneisses probably are the metamorphosed rep.resentatives of the oldest pre~ Cambrian rocks in the area., Units of migmatite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014
    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014 Aerial detection surveys of tree killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado’s forest lands. This is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service and the Colorado State Forest Service. In 2014, 28 million acres were surveyed by 7 trained federal and state surveyors. Highlights of the survey by damage agent are reported below. In 2014, all reported agents are insects that kill and/or defoliate trees. This report includes only forest damage that is visible from the air. Spruce Beetle • Since 1996, spruce beetle has affected approximately 1,397,000 acres to varying degrees in Colorado. • Spruce beetle activity was detected on 485,000 acres in Colorado in 2014. Of these, 253,000 acres are in areas not previously mapped as having spruce beetle activity (new acres). This epidemic continues to expand rapidly (Figures 1, 2). In some areas, the outbreak has moved through entire drainages in the course of one year. In the most heavily impacted drainages, nearly every mature spruce has been killed (Figure 3). • The spruce beetle epidemic is expanding most rapidly in southern Colorado’s Forests and impacts many thousands of acres. Areas affected are found from the La Garita Wilderness Area to north of Cottonwood Pass, the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, as well as south to the Colorado border and into New Mexico. Aerial survey in south central Colorado showed spruce beetle epidemics expanded on the San Juan (26,000 new acres on 53,000 active acres), Rio Grande (78,000 new acres on 192,000 active acres), Gunnison (54,000 new acres on 79,000 active acres), and San Isabel (26,000 new acres on 31,000 active acres) National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAK to PRAIRIE: BOTANICAL LANDSCAPES of the PIKES PEAK REGION Tass Kelso Dept of Biology Colorado College 2012
    !"#$%&'%!(#)()"*%+'&#,)-#.%.#,/0-#!"0%'1%&2"%!)$"0% !"#$%("3)',% &455%$6758% /69:%8;%+<878=>% -878?4@8%-8776=6% ABCA% Kelso-Peak to Prairie Biodiversity and Place: Landscape’s Coat of Many Colors Mountain peaks often capture our imaginations, spark our instincts to explore and conquer, or heighten our artistic senses. Mt. Olympus, mythological home of the Greek gods, Yosemite’s Half Dome, the ever-classic Matterhorn, Alaska’s Denali, and Colorado’s Pikes Peak all share the quality of compelling attraction that a charismatic alpine profile evokes. At the base of our peak along the confluence of two small, nondescript streams, Native Americans gathered thousands of years ago. Explorers, immigrants, city-visionaries and fortune-seekers arrived successively, all shaping in turn the region and communities that today spread from the flanks of Pikes Peak. From any vantage point along the Interstate 25 corridor, the Colorado plains, or the Arkansas River Valley escarpments, Pikes Peak looms as the dominant feature of a diverse “bioregion”, a geographical area with a distinct flora and fauna, that stretches from alpine tundra to desert grasslands. “Biodiversity” is shorthand for biological diversity: a term covering a broad array of contexts from the genetics of individual organisms to ecosystem interactions. The news tells us daily of ongoing threats from the loss of biodiversity on global and regional levels as humans extend their influence across the face of the earth and into its sustaining processes. On a regional level, biologists look for measures of biodiversity, celebrate when they find sites where those measures are high and mourn when they diminish; conservation organizations and in some cases, legal statutes, try to protect biodiversity, and communities often struggle to balance human needs for social infrastructure with desirable elements of the natural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology Database for Central Colorado
    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology Database for Central Colorado By T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt, 2009, Geochronology database for central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 489, 13 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Story of Colorado's Sangre De Cristo Range
    The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover shows a landscape carved by glaciers. Front cover, Crestone Peak on left and the three summits of Kit Carson Mountain on right. Back cover, Humboldt Peak on left and Crestone Needle on right. Photograph by the author looking south from Mt. Adams. The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range By David A. Lindsey A description of the rocks and landscapes of the Sangre de Cristo Range and the forces that formed them. Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lindsey, D.A., 2010, The geologic story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1349, 14 p. iii Contents The Oldest Rocks ...........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado
    Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Prepared for: Pueblo County Planning Department Pueblo, Colorado Prepared by: Susan Spackman Panjabi, Botanist John Sovell, Zoologist Georgia Doyle, Wetland Ecologist Denise Culver, Ecologist Lee Grunau, Conservation Planner May 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 USER’S GUIDE The Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County was conducted one year after the Survey of Critical Wetland and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties. The projects, both conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, are two distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout the globe, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each report prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each report, so that each report can stand alone and be used independently of the other. This report, Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, presents all potential conservation areas identified in Pueblo County that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • The Rocky Mountain Front, Southwestern USA
    The Rocky Mountain Front, southwestern USA Charles E. Chapin, Shari A. Kelley, and Steven M. Cather New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT northeast-trending faults cross the Front thrust in southwest Wyoming and northern Range–Denver Basin boundary. However, Utah. A remarkable attribute of the RMF is The Rocky Mountain Front (RMF) trends several features changed from south to north that it maintained its position through multi- north-south near long 105°W for ~1500 km across the CMB. (1) The axis of the Denver ple orogenies and changes in orientation from near the U.S.-Mexico border to south- Basin was defl ected ~60 km to the north- and strength of tectonic stresses. During the ern Wyoming. This long, straight, persistent east. (2) The trend of the RMF changed from Laramide orogeny, the RMF marked a tec- structural boundary originated between 1.4 north–northwest to north. (3) Structural tonic boundary beyond which major contrac- and 1.1 Ga in the Mesoproterozoic. It cuts style of the Front Range–Denver Basin mar- tional partitioning of the Cordilleran fore- the 1.4 Ga Granite-Rhyolite Province and gin changed from northeast-vergent thrusts land was unable to penetrate. However, the was intruded by the shallow-level alkaline to northeast-dipping, high-angle reverse nature of the lithospheric fl aw that underlies granitic batholith of Pikes Peak (1.09 Ga) faults. (4) Early Laramide uplift north of the RMF is an unanswered question. in central Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]