White Pine Blister Rust Surveys in the Sangre De Cristo and Wet Mountains of Southern Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White Pine Blister Rust Surveys in the Sangre De Cristo and Wet Mountains of Southern Colorado Biological Evaluation R2-06-05 White Pine Blister Rust Surveys in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of Southern Colorado Photo: Anna Schoettle, RMRS Kelly Sullivan Burns USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region February 2006 White Pine Blister Rust Surveys in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of Southern Colorado Biological Evaluation R2-06-05 February 2006 Prepared by: __________________________________ Kelly Sullivan Burns Forest Pathologist, Lakewood Service Center (LSC), Forest Health Management Approved by: ___________________________________ Jeffrey J. Witcosky Entomologist and Leader, LSC, Forest Health Management and _________________________________ Frank J. Cross Group Leader, Forest Health Management USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Renewable Resources P. O. Box 25127 Denver, CO 80225-0127 2 INTRODUCTION White pine blister rust (WPBR), caused by the fungus Cronartium ribicola, is an exotic, invasive disease of white, stone, and foxtail pines in the subgenus Strobus. The disease was accidentally introduced into the Pacific Northwest in 1910 and since then has spread nearly throughout the range of western white pines. White pine blister rust has a complex lifecycle involving five different spore stages and an alternate host, currants and gooseberries in the genus Ribes1. Pine hosts in Region 2 include limber pine (Pinus flexilis), Rocky Mountain (RM) bristlecone pine (P. aristata), whitebark pine (P. albicaulis), and southwestern white pine (P. strobiformis). White This WPBR canker will eventually girdle pine blister rust causes cankers which result in the tree. mortality of the portion of the branch or stem above the canker. Trees weakened by blister rust become susceptible to other damaging agents such as bark beetles. White pine blister rust may significantly impact reproductive potential by killing off cone-bearing branches. Small trees are easily killed because infections generally occur close to the main stem and ultimately girdle the tree. More detailed information on WPBR biology is available on the Forest and Shade Tree Pathology website (Worrall 2006): http://www.forestpathology.org/dis_wpbr.html. Limber and RM bristlecone pine are well distributed within the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains (Biery 2003). High elevation white pines serve many important ecological functions. They provide food for wildlife, stabilize slopes, and maintain cover on harsh, rugged sites where little else could grow (Schoettle 2004b). They are some of the oldest and largest pines in the Rocky Mountain Region and are especially valued because of their unique cultural and ecological characteristics. White pine blister rust may result in greatly altered and even devastated ecosystems. For example, in heavily impacted areas, reduced post-fire reforestation and reduced sustainability of bird and wildlife species may result. On sites where limber pine is the only tree species present and mortality is high, hydrologic changes and slope instability could occur. Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine is a high elevation species which grows on dry sites. The range of RM bristlecone pine is almost entirely within the state of Colorado, with populations extending south into northern New Mexico and a disjunct population in the San Francisco Peaks of northern Arizona. In the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, RM bristlecone pines are often found mixed with other species such as aspen (Populus tremuloides), Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmanni), limber pine, and/or ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) (Biery 2003). They are commonly found on rocky sites, ridges and 1 Recently, researchers identified naturally occurring C. ribicola infections on non-Ribes species hosts including Pedicularis racemosa and Castilleja miniata (Zambino et al., In Press). This new discovery could dramatically affect our understanding of WPBR epidemiology. 3 open parks on southeast to west aspects from 9,000 to 12,000 ft in elevation. Bristlecone pine is common throughout the Sangre de Cristo Mountains and on the west side of the Wet Mountains. Limber pine has a broad elevational range growing from below the lower treeline up to upper treeline (Schoettle 2004). Small amounts of limber pine occur in most stands in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, but it becomes codominant near ridges and on rocky, south aspects between 8,500 and 10,000 feet in elevation (Biery 2003). Limber pine is gradually replaced by RM bristlecone pine at higher elevations and on the westward side of mountains. Limber pine is often a minor component of stands dominated by other species and is more common in the Wet Mountains where elevations are generally lower. In the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, limber pine-dominated stands are most common in the southeastern portion of the range forming an intermediate belt between lower elevation and subalpine forests (Alington 1998). WPBR was discovered for the first time in Colorado in 1998 just below the Colorado- Wyoming border north of Red Feather Lakes (Johnson and Jacobi 2000). Presumably, the disease spread south into Colorado from Wyoming where the disease has been present for decades (Brown 1978). Other parts of Colorado had not been surveyed extensively until an Evaluation Monitoring project was initiated in 2001, Monitoring White Pine Blister Rust Spread and Establishment in the Central Rocky Mountains (J.L. Harris and J.T. Hoffman, unpublished data). Surprisingly, field crews discovered WPBR in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of southern Colorado, nearly 200 miles from any other known infection zone. The closest outbreak area to the south is on Gallinas Peak on the Cibola National Forest in central New Mexico (Conklin 2004). Infections in southern Colorado were found primarily on limber pine, but infected RM bristlecone pines were also observed for the first time in their native range (Blodgett and Sullivan 2004a, Blodgett and Sullivan 2004b). Great Basin bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) is the only native North American five-needle pine that remains uninfected. The distribution of WPBR in the central Rocky Mountains is displayed in Figure 4. It is unclear how Cronartium ribicola dispersed such a long distance. Possible theories include long distance spore dispersal in upper-level air currents or via infected nursery stock (either Ribes or white pine). Research suggests that it is likely that an isolated infestation in New Mexico is the result of a single introduction by long-distance atmospheric transport from infected areas in the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Frank and Geils, unpublished data). Atmospheric conditions capable of transporting spores were analyzed for transport capacity and then compared to dates on which surface conditions occurred that were conducive to fungal infection. Results demonstrate that necessary atmospheric conditions are common and surface conditions that coincide with these atmospheric events are rare, but do occur in the vicinity of the New Mexico infestations. It is possible that a similar situation occurred in southern Colorado. A canker growth rate model was developed which uses maximum canker length as a surrogate for canker age allowing managers to estimate the duration of WPBR infestations in limber pine (Kearns 2005). Mean longitudinal growth rate of actively 4 growing branch cankers was 3.3 inches per year. In 2005, the USFS and Colorado State University scientists measured over 600 WPBR branch cankers along the Mosca Creek Trail in the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve (GRSA) as part of a pruning study. Maximum canker length was 36 inches suggesting that the disease has been present in that valley since 1993. The longest canker observed in the Wet Mountains was 16 in (this study) signifying that the disease was introduced on the pine host around 1999. The potential distribution of WPBR for white pines in Colorado was modeled using data from Wyoming limber pine plots, extensive Ribes plots installed throughout Wyoming and Colorado and PRISM climate data (Kearns 2005). Only the PRISM climate data were selected using classification and regression tree (CART) analyses to model the relationship between the site and climate variables and the presence or absence of rust for the state of Colorado. Important classification variables were May relative humidity, May minimum temperature, May precipitation and August minimum temperature. Results suggest that approximately 50 percent of Colorado’s white pine stands are at risk for WPBR establishment. This includes a significant portion of the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of southern Colorado. An analysis of the model and how it can be applied locally is available on the Rocky Mountains Region’s Forest Health Management website (http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/fhm/). Objectives In light of the new infestations in southern Colorado, a more in-depth survey was initiated in 2004 to supplement the Evaluation Monitoring survey initiated in 2001. The purpose of this study was to delimit the current geographic extent and intensity of the southern Colorado infestation, to determine the incidence of the disease on RM bristlecone pine and to establish long-term survey plots in and around the Sangre de Cristo infestation to monitor distribution, rates of spread and intensification and ecological impacts of the disease. An additional objective was to create a GIS database of recent USFS (Region 2, 3 and 4) and CSU survey locations that can be used to map the current distribution of WPBR and locate areas for future surveys and monitoring. This report provides results from all USFS Forest Health Management surveys conducted in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of Colorado between 2003 and 2005. METHODS Study Area This study was conducted in the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains of south-central Colorado (Figure 2) encompassing portions of the San Carlos Ranger District of the San Isabel National Forest, the Conejos Peak Ranger District of the Rio Grande National Forest and the GRSA. The Saguache Ranger District of the Rio Grande National Forest, the Huerfano State Wildlife Area and BLM lands bordering the San Isabel National 5 Forest were visited on reconnaissance trips however no plots were installed in these areas.
Recommended publications
  • Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014
    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014 Aerial detection surveys of tree killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado’s forest lands. This is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service and the Colorado State Forest Service. In 2014, 28 million acres were surveyed by 7 trained federal and state surveyors. Highlights of the survey by damage agent are reported below. In 2014, all reported agents are insects that kill and/or defoliate trees. This report includes only forest damage that is visible from the air. Spruce Beetle • Since 1996, spruce beetle has affected approximately 1,397,000 acres to varying degrees in Colorado. • Spruce beetle activity was detected on 485,000 acres in Colorado in 2014. Of these, 253,000 acres are in areas not previously mapped as having spruce beetle activity (new acres). This epidemic continues to expand rapidly (Figures 1, 2). In some areas, the outbreak has moved through entire drainages in the course of one year. In the most heavily impacted drainages, nearly every mature spruce has been killed (Figure 3). • The spruce beetle epidemic is expanding most rapidly in southern Colorado’s Forests and impacts many thousands of acres. Areas affected are found from the La Garita Wilderness Area to north of Cottonwood Pass, the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, as well as south to the Colorado border and into New Mexico. Aerial survey in south central Colorado showed spruce beetle epidemics expanded on the San Juan (26,000 new acres on 53,000 active acres), Rio Grande (78,000 new acres on 192,000 active acres), Gunnison (54,000 new acres on 79,000 active acres), and San Isabel (26,000 new acres on 31,000 active acres) National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAK to PRAIRIE: BOTANICAL LANDSCAPES of the PIKES PEAK REGION Tass Kelso Dept of Biology Colorado College 2012
    !"#$%&'%!(#)()"*%+'&#,)-#.%.#,/0-#!"0%'1%&2"%!)$"0% !"#$%("3)',% &455%$6758% /69:%8;%+<878=>% -878?4@8%-8776=6% ABCA% Kelso-Peak to Prairie Biodiversity and Place: Landscape’s Coat of Many Colors Mountain peaks often capture our imaginations, spark our instincts to explore and conquer, or heighten our artistic senses. Mt. Olympus, mythological home of the Greek gods, Yosemite’s Half Dome, the ever-classic Matterhorn, Alaska’s Denali, and Colorado’s Pikes Peak all share the quality of compelling attraction that a charismatic alpine profile evokes. At the base of our peak along the confluence of two small, nondescript streams, Native Americans gathered thousands of years ago. Explorers, immigrants, city-visionaries and fortune-seekers arrived successively, all shaping in turn the region and communities that today spread from the flanks of Pikes Peak. From any vantage point along the Interstate 25 corridor, the Colorado plains, or the Arkansas River Valley escarpments, Pikes Peak looms as the dominant feature of a diverse “bioregion”, a geographical area with a distinct flora and fauna, that stretches from alpine tundra to desert grasslands. “Biodiversity” is shorthand for biological diversity: a term covering a broad array of contexts from the genetics of individual organisms to ecosystem interactions. The news tells us daily of ongoing threats from the loss of biodiversity on global and regional levels as humans extend their influence across the face of the earth and into its sustaining processes. On a regional level, biologists look for measures of biodiversity, celebrate when they find sites where those measures are high and mourn when they diminish; conservation organizations and in some cases, legal statutes, try to protect biodiversity, and communities often struggle to balance human needs for social infrastructure with desirable elements of the natural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology Database for Central Colorado
    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology Database for Central Colorado By T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt, 2009, Geochronology database for central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 489, 13 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Story of Colorado's Sangre De Cristo Range
    The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover shows a landscape carved by glaciers. Front cover, Crestone Peak on left and the three summits of Kit Carson Mountain on right. Back cover, Humboldt Peak on left and Crestone Needle on right. Photograph by the author looking south from Mt. Adams. The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range By David A. Lindsey A description of the rocks and landscapes of the Sangre de Cristo Range and the forces that formed them. Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lindsey, D.A., 2010, The geologic story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1349, 14 p. iii Contents The Oldest Rocks ...........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado
    Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Prepared for: Pueblo County Planning Department Pueblo, Colorado Prepared by: Susan Spackman Panjabi, Botanist John Sovell, Zoologist Georgia Doyle, Wetland Ecologist Denise Culver, Ecologist Lee Grunau, Conservation Planner May 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 USER’S GUIDE The Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County was conducted one year after the Survey of Critical Wetland and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties. The projects, both conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, are two distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout the globe, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each report prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each report, so that each report can stand alone and be used independently of the other. This report, Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, presents all potential conservation areas identified in Pueblo County that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • The Rocky Mountain Front, Southwestern USA
    The Rocky Mountain Front, southwestern USA Charles E. Chapin, Shari A. Kelley, and Steven M. Cather New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT northeast-trending faults cross the Front thrust in southwest Wyoming and northern Range–Denver Basin boundary. However, Utah. A remarkable attribute of the RMF is The Rocky Mountain Front (RMF) trends several features changed from south to north that it maintained its position through multi- north-south near long 105°W for ~1500 km across the CMB. (1) The axis of the Denver ple orogenies and changes in orientation from near the U.S.-Mexico border to south- Basin was defl ected ~60 km to the north- and strength of tectonic stresses. During the ern Wyoming. This long, straight, persistent east. (2) The trend of the RMF changed from Laramide orogeny, the RMF marked a tec- structural boundary originated between 1.4 north–northwest to north. (3) Structural tonic boundary beyond which major contrac- and 1.1 Ga in the Mesoproterozoic. It cuts style of the Front Range–Denver Basin mar- tional partitioning of the Cordilleran fore- the 1.4 Ga Granite-Rhyolite Province and gin changed from northeast-vergent thrusts land was unable to penetrate. However, the was intruded by the shallow-level alkaline to northeast-dipping, high-angle reverse nature of the lithospheric fl aw that underlies granitic batholith of Pikes Peak (1.09 Ga) faults. (4) Early Laramide uplift north of the RMF is an unanswered question. in central Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]