DOCSLIB.ORG

Dealing with Undeniable Differences in Thessaloniki's Solidarity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dealing with Undeniable Differences in Thessaloniki's Solidarity sustainability Article DealingArticle with Undeniable Differences in Dealing with Undeniable Differences in Thessaloniki’s Solidarity Economy of Food Thessaloniki’s Solidarity Economy of Food Christabel Buchanan Christabel Buchanan Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK; [email protected] for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK; [email protected] Received:Received: 22 22 February February 2019; 2019; Accepted: Accepted:4 04 April April 2019; 2019; Published: Published: 24date April 2019 Abstract:Abstract:In In the the context context of of capitalist capitalist crisis,crisis, aa re-emergencere-emergence of of reciprocal reciprocal economic economic relationships relationships has has beenbeen praised praised by by postcapitalist postcapitalist researchers. researchers. Self-organisedSelf-organised solidarity solidarity food food economies economies have have indeed indeed broughtbrought promise promise of of democratic democratic change. change. However, th thisis article article draws draws on on two two years years of offieldwork fieldwork in in ThessalonikiThessaloniki to to develop develop Iris Iris Young’s Young’sPolitics Politics ofof DiDifferencefference inin order order to to challenge challenge the the view view of ofsolidarity solidarity economyeconomy as as wholly wholly a a process process of of collaboration. collaboration. Th Thus,us, the the article article overturns overturns prevalent prevalent myths myths regarding regarding thethe cultural cultural ineptitude ineptitude of of Greek Greek actors. actors. InIn doingdoing so so,, it it highlights highlights the the need need for for food food movements movements to to acknowledgeacknowledge the the inevitable inevitable tensions tensions thatthat arisearise fromfrom structural inequalities. inequalities. The The article article argues argues that that overcomingovercoming these these tensions tensions requires requires challengingchallenging didifference-blindnessfference-blindness in in grassroots grassroots democracy. democracy. It It concludesconcludes that that an an acknowledgement acknowledgement of of shiftingshifting structuralstructural inequalities, inequalities, exaggerated exaggerated by by the the economic economic crisis,crisis, must must be be incorporated incorporated into into anan initiative’sinitiative’s democratic processes processes alongside alongside mechanisms mechanisms for for dealingdealing with with disharmony. disharmony. Keywords:Keywords:self-organisation; self-organisation; solidarity solidarity economy;economy; conflict;conflict; difference; difference; economic economic crisis crisis Angelos: The truth is that we established [our small farm] … but we saw how difficult it was, just the two of us who agreed with the basic rules and carried them forward. Interviewer: Why was it difficult? What were the fundamental difficulties that you encountered? Maria: We didn’t find many young people who wanted to join us. Angelos: And generally speaking our DNA doesn’t contain collaboration, it is lacking that characteristic. Interviewer: Is it our DNA though? Angelos: Definitely. Maria: Collaboration is a mentality, but we don’t acknowledge it. Excerpt 1. A quote exemplifying the allegory that Greek people are innately unable to collaborate. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction ExperimentsExperiments in in autonomous autonomous food food initiativesinitiatives have emerged emerged in in response response to to the the economic economic failures failures of theof the conventional conventional food food system. system. TheseThese reflectreflect what is is more more generally generally referred referred toto as as the the ‘solidarity ‘solidarity economy’,economy’, which which aims aims to to build build cooperation cooperation and and collective collective actionaction throughthrough closer,direct and direct reciprocal and more reciprocaleconomic economic relationships relationships [1]. The solidarity [1]. The economy solidarity has economy been welcomed has been by members welcomed of Greek by members society, of Greektheir society, government their [2], government and intellectuals [2], and [3], intellectuals as a solution [3 ],to asthe a capitalist solution crisis to the [4,5]. capitalist However, crisis it [is4, 5]. However,now ten ityears is now since ten the years crisis since began, the crisisand the began, proce andss of the building process solidarity of building is not solidarity all hopeful is not[6]. all hopefulDuring [6 ].the During years 2016–2018, the years 2016–2018,which informed which the informed research the reported research in this reported article, in several this article, initiatives several initiativesexperienced experienced internal organisational internal organisational dynamics or dynamics financial or strains financial that strainshave pushed that have the initiatives pushed the initiativesthemselves themselves into crisis. into As crisis.will be Aselaborated will be elaboratedin this article, in the this experience article, the of experience conflict and of tension conflict has and tensionled to hasa narrative led to a that narrative the potential that the of the potential solidari ofty the economy solidarity is limited economy by the is nature limited of bypeople. the nature There of people.Sustainability There 2019 is, a 11 reified, x; doi: FOR cultural PEER REVIEW myth, held and perpetuated by Greekwww. participantsmdpi.com/journal of/sustainability the solidarity Sustainability 2019, 11, 2426; doi:10.3390/su11082426 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2019, 11, 2426 2 of 23 economy, that as a society they are unable to collaborate and are prone to antagonistic relations, as exemplified in the quote in Excerpt 1. This attitude is mirrored by depictions of a devastated social fabric. During the period after the dictatorship (metapolitefsi), considered the first period of stable liberal democracy, there was said to have emerged “an all-pervasive individualistic culture (accompanied by hyperconsumerism), which led to grave impairment of the sense of collectivity and taking care of one another, as well as of community, solidarity and shared responsibility within Greek society” [7] (p.5). Other scholarly work contends that a long-term corrupt and unaccountable culture of the political class has resulted in lack of interpersonal trust, purportedly demonstrated by European statistics on social trust in which Greece repeatedly comes last [8]. Evoking the term “civic pathology” to refer to the endemic distrust in Greek society, which existed before the recent crisis, Theocharis and van Deth [8] explicitly play down the effect of economic and financial crisis on solidarity relations, instead underlining cultural and political factors linked to political corruption and social distrust. Similarly, in international commentary on the Greek crisis, the portrayal of Greek people has been overwhelmingly negative, with stereotypes of a “corrupt” and “irresponsible” society, whose immoral citizens are unarguably responsible for their own hardship [9,10]. Moreover, the anger of some Greek people at dissenting responses to draconian austerity measures is discussed as a possible attempt to evade their own responsibility and make sense of socioeconomic transformations perceived to be out of their control [11], facilitating the neoliberal myth of individualised responsibility for economic success or failure. This stereotype of Greek people has also been used to justify the structural adjustments forced on the Greek people by the Troika [12,13]. Based on 24 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Thessaloniki, this article challenges the common allegory of a fundamental cultural (or even ethnic) ineptitude to collaborate, indicated by the reference to collaboration “not being in our DNA” as expressed by Angelos in the above excerpt. Using ideas from Iris Young’s [14] The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference, I develop the argument that structurally rooted conflicts are amplified by the capitalist crisis [13]. Additionally, I argue that the romanticisation of solidarity, in the internal and external promotion of economic alternatives, alongside the lack of a political sensibility to recognise and mediate structural difference, allows for the glossing over of differences that are the cause of tension and divisions. Despite, and in fact possibly as a result of, efforts to create horizontal decision-making spaces, the denial of difference allows informal hierarchies to develop and power to accumulate with few individuals. The eventual consequence can be fragmentation based on exclusionary politics—a dynamic that does not sit comfortably with the concept of solidarity and therefore reinforces the problem. 2. Literature Review 2.1. The Meaning of Solidarity (Economy) Solidarity is not a static or uniform term; it has been the subject of debate amongst scholars and activists in Greece over these years of crisis [15–19]. Viewed as a moral act, it must be enacted outside of the family, without the intent of personal gain or profit, nor with the embedding of exclusionary practices such as soup kitchens run exclusively for Greeks [4,16]. Arampatzi [15] differentiates between the building of mutual and reciprocal relations for long-term social empowerment and collective political struggle, with one-sided humanitarian or philanthropic transactions, which reproduce vertical forms of social hierarchies. In crisis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Relocalization and Prefigurative Movements
    1 ‘RELOCALIZATION AND PREFIGURATIVE MOVEMENTS’ AS SOCIAL NETWORKS AGAINST GLOBALIZATION: THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL ALTERNATIVES TO GLOBAL CAPITALISM Michail Psimitis email: [email protected] Associate professor full address: Ioustinianou 3 Department of Sociology 81100 Mytilene University of the Aegean tel: (+30)22510-36514 & 23597 ABSTRACT Drawing upon an older periodization concerning worldwide social movements, we can say that the current decade is the first one of a period characterized by the strong presence of ‘relocalization and prefigurative social movements’. While earlier forms of organized collective actions either remained almost exclusively confined to the limits of the nation state (labor movements and new social movements) or explicitly rejected the nation state as the objective of their presence and chose a global action (global movements), modern relocalization movements reject both types of action and prefer an action focused directly against globalization. They act outside and away from the state and focus on territorial regeneration of the local autonomy as the cornerstone of self-governed and direct-democratic communities, with strong egalitarian social ties and a propensity for coequal participation. 2 These contemporary movements appear as forms of local resistance to globalization, but they are not showing trends of spatial or social isolation or marginalization, as happened, for instance, to most old communes and intentional communities of the past century. Instead, these are cosmopolitan communities that
    [Show full text]
  • Community Power and Grassroots Democracy Other Books by Michael Kaufman
    BY MICHAEL KAUFMAN & HAROLDO DILLA ALFONSO COMMUNITY POWER AND GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY OTHER BOOKS BY MICHAEL KAUFMAN Jamaica Under Manleji: Dilemmas of Socialism and Democracjy Bejond Essqys Men on Pleasure, Power and Change (ed.) Cracking the Armour: Power, Pain and the Lives of Men Theorizing Masculinities (co-edited with Harry Brod) COMMUNITY POWER AND GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY The Transformation of Social Life Edited Michael Kaufman and Haroldo Dilla Alfonso ZED BOOKS London & New Jersej INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE Ottawa Cairo Dakar Johannesburg Montevideo Nairobi • New Delhi Singapore Community Power and Grassroots Democracj was first published in 1997 by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK, and 165 First Avenue, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey 07716, USA, and the International Development Research Centre, P0 Box 8500, Ottawa, ON, Canada KIG 3H9. Editorial copyright © Michael Kaufman, 1997 Individual chapters copyright © individual contributors The moral rights of the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 Typeset in Monotype Garamond by Lucy Morton, London SEI2 Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by Biddies Ltd, Guildford and King's Lynn All rights reserved A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Contress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Community power and grassroots democracy the transformation of social life / edited by Michael Kaufman, and Haroldo Dilla Alfonso. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1—85649—487—X. ISBN 1-85649—488—8 (pbk.) 1. Community development—Latin America—Case studies. 2. Political participation—Latin America—Case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues
    Published in Kawano, Emily and Tom Masterson and Jonathan Teller-Ellsberg (eds). Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics. 2010. Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues Ethan Miller People across the United States and throughout the world are experiencing the devastating effects of an economy that places the profit of a few above the well being of everyone else. The political and business leaders who benefit from this arrangement consistently proclaim that there are no real alternatives, yet citizens and grassroots organizations around the world are boldly demonstrating otherwise. A compelling array of grassroots economic initiatives already exist, often hidden or marginalized, in the “nooks and crannies” of the dominant economy: worker, consumer and producer cooperatives; fair trade initiatives; intentional communities; alternative currencies; community-run social centers and resource libraries; community development credit unions; community gardens; open source free software initiatives; community supported agriculture (CSA) programs; community land trusts and more. While incredibly diverse, these initiatives share a broad set of values that stand in bold contrast to those of the dominant economy. Instead of enforcing a culture of cutthroat competition, they build cultures and communities of cooperation. Rather than isolating us from one another, they foster relationships of mutual support and solidarity. In place of centralized structures of control, they move us towards shared responsibility and directly democratic decision-making. Instead of imposing a single global monoculture, they strengthen the diversity of local cultures and environments. Instead of prioritizing profit over all else, they encourage commitment to broader work for social, economic, and environmental justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an ‘Alternative’ Globalisation*
    The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an ‘Alternative’ Globalisation* Background paper prepared by: NANCY NEAMTAN Présidente du Chantier de l’économie sociale In preparation for the symposium Citizenship and Globalization: Exploring Participation and Democracy in a Global Context Sponsored by: The Carold Institute for the Advancement of Citizenship in Social Change Langara College, Vancouver, June 14-16, 2002 *Translation: Anika Mendell The Carold Institute appreciates the financial assistance for translation provided by the Canadian Commission for UNESCO. The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an “Alternative” Globalisation Introduction The social and solidarity economy are concepts that have become increasingly recognised and used in Quebec since 1995. Following the examples of certain European, as well as Latin American countries, these terms emerged in Quebec as part of a growing will and desire on the part of social movements to propose an alternative model of development, in response to the dominant neo-liberal model. The emergence of this movement has not been without debate, nor obstacles. In fact, the contours and composition of the social economy are still being determined; its definition continues to evolve. However, after the second World Social Forum, which took place in Porto Alegre in February 2002, where the social and solidarity economy were important themes, it is now clear that this movement is firmly inscribed in an international movement for an alternative globalisation. Defining the social and solidarity economy Since the terms “social economy” or “economy of solidarity” are not yet widely used in Canada, outside of Quebec, it is important to establish certain defining elements. The social economy combines two terms that are often contradictory: • “economy” refers to the concrete production of goods or of services by business or enterprise that contributes to a net increase in collective wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 2 2021 Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Chris Wright [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Chris (2021) "Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.9.1.009647 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol9/iss1/2 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Abstract In the twenty-first century, it is time that Marxists updated the conception of socialist revolution they have inherited from Marx, Engels, and Lenin. Slogans about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” “smashing the capitalist state” and carrying out a social revolution from the commanding heights of a reconstituted state are completely obsolete. In this article I propose a reconceptualization that accomplishes several purposes: first, it explains the logical and empirical problems with Marx’s classical theory of revolution; second, it revises the classical theory to make it, for the first time, logically consistent with the premises of historical materialism; third, it provides a (Marxist) theoretical grounding for activism in the solidarity economy, and thus partially reconciles Marxism with anarchism; fourth, it accounts for the long-term failure of all attempts at socialist revolution so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Expected Model & Process of Inclusive Democracy in Nepal
    Expected Model & Process of Inclusive Democracy in Nepal Krishna B. Bhattachan, Ph.D. Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu Nepal e-mail: [email protected] Paper presented in an international seminar on The Agenda of Transformation: Inclusion in Nepali democracy organized by the Social Science Baha at Birendra International Convention Centre in Kathmandu, Nepal 24-26 April, 2003 ii Abstract This paper gives a picture of the forest of inclusive democracy in Nepal, which is in the preliminary process of making. The paper begins with an overview of what went wrong in the past and the present in a multi-caste/ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-religious and multi-cultural country, Nepal, as perceived by excluded groups/communities. It identifies that the main socio-cultural-political fault line in the past and the present, irrespective of political systems, is the ideology, policy and practice of Bahunbad (Brahmanism). The main playing fields of Bahunbad discussed in the paper include caste/ethnicity, language, religion, culture, gender and region. This paper analyzes demands made by different excluded groups/communities, including indigenous nationalities, Dalit, Madhesi Hindus and Muslims, women, mother tongue speakers and non-Hindu religious groups, to create a just, equitable and democratic Nepalese society and also to bring positive peace in Nepal. This paper analyzes in detail mechanisms to include excluded groups/communities with focus on interconnection of federalism, proportional representation, autonomy based on caste/ethnicity, language and region and special measures or affirmative action or positive discrimination—remedial and preferential. Grassroots democracy as practiced by some indigenous nationalities is also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Grassroots Democracy and the Participation of Urban People in Central Highlands, Vietnam
    International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2019, PP 84-92 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0606010 www.arcjournals.org Grassroots Democracy and the Participation of Urban People in Central Highlands, Vietnam Hoang Ba Thinh1*, Doan ThiThanhHuyen2 1Hanoi University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam 2Vietnam Women’s Academy *Corresponding Author: Hoang Ba Thin, Hanoi University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam Abstract: In many countries around the world, especially the developing countries, the process of urban planning, construction and management with participation of the people/community have shown the advantages and effectiveness of urban development with participation of the people in communities. Based on the research results of the State-level scientific and technological project “Urbanization and the management of the urbanization process in sustainable development in the Central Highlands” (Code TN3/X15), the article will focus on introducing some basic views of the Party and the State of Vietnam on grassroots democracy; then will analyze the participation of urban people in Central Highlands in the process of urban construction, planning and development. The research shows that in the process of urbanization in the Central Highlands;the participation level of the majority of the people is just at the level of the people know, the people discuss; and gradually decreased at the level of the people do and the people check. There exists a difference between the provinces in the Central Highlands about the level of the people’s participation in exercising grassroots democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Path to Democracy? Assessing Village Elections in China
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Path to democracy? Assessing village elections in China Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8wg6t281 Journal Journal of Contemporary China, 18(60) ISSN 1067-0564 Authors O'Brien, KJ Han, R Publication Date 2009-06-01 DOI 10.1080/10670560902770206 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Path to Democracy? Assessing Village Elections in China Kevin J. O’Brien (corresponding author) Travers Department of Political Science 210 Barrows Hall University of California, Berkeley 94720 Berkeley, CA 9720-1950 [email protected] Rongbin Han Travers Department of Political Science 210 Barrows Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-1950 [email protected] January 1, 2008 Abstract: Election procedures in rural China have improved greatly over the last twenty years and a good number of reasonably free and fair elections have been held. But changes in the “exercise of power” have not kept up with changes in the “access to power.” In many communities, township authorities, Party branches, and social forces (such as clans, religious groups, and underworld elements) continue to impede democratic rule. This suggests that a purely procedural definition of democracy is problematic and that democratization depends on the power configuration in which elected bodies are embedded. Putting grassroots democracy into place goes well beyond getting the procedures right, and “high quality” democracy rests on much more than convening good village elections every three years. 2 Path to Democracy? Assessing Village Elections in China The launch of village elections in China has passed its twentieth anniversary.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues
    Published in Kawano, Emily and Tom Masterson and Jonathan Teller-Ellsberg (eds). Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics. 2010. Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues Ethan Miller People across the United States and throughout the world are experiencing the devastating effects of an economy that places the profit of a few above the well being of everyone else. The political and business leaders who benefit from this arrangement consistently proclaim that there are no real alternatives, yet citizens and grassroots organizations around the world are boldly demonstrating otherwise. A compelling array of grassroots economic initiatives already exist, often hidden or marginalized, in the “nooks and crannies” of the dominant economy: worker, consumer and producer cooperatives; fair trade initiatives; intentional communities; alternative currencies; community-run social centers and resource libraries; community development credit unions; community gardens; open source free software initiatives; community supported agriculture (CSA) programs; community land trusts and more. While incredibly diverse, these initiatives share a broad set of values that stand in bold contrast to those of the dominant economy. Instead of enforcing a culture of cutthroat competition, they build cultures and communities of cooperation. Rather than isolating us from one another, they foster relationships of mutual support and solidarity. In place of centralized structures of control, they move us towards shared responsibility and directly democratic decision-making. Instead of imposing a single global monoculture, they strengthen the diversity of local cultures and environments. Instead of prioritizing profit over all else, they encourage commitment to broader work for social, economic, and environmental justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Compilation Anniversary Edition July 2019
    Anniversary Edition Democratic Decay & Renewal (DEM-DEC) Research Compilation Anniversary Edition July 2019 This Research Compilation w a s issued on 12 July 2019. It c o n t a i n s t h e M a i n B ibliography o n D E M - D E C ( i s s u e d 24 June 2018) and all 11 monthly Global Research Updates issued to date . In all, this compilation contains o v e r 200 books, 500 articles, 30 book reviews, 40 p o l i c y i t e m s , a n d m o r e . www.democratic1 -decay.org A Special Research Compilation to Mark Our Anniversary The global online platform Democratic Decay & Renewal (DEM-DEC) went live on 25 June 2018. It aims to assist researchers and policymakers focused on the deterioration of liberal democracy worldwide, and on re-thinking democracy. One of our main activities is to help analysts to stay abreast of the rapidly growing research and policy analysis in this area. Since launch DEM-DEC has been used by thousands of democracy defenders and analysts worldwide, in over 130 states. The platform has expanded over time, with recent additions including an expanded Experts Database and a special section devoted to the EU treaty process for addressing rule of law backsliding (curated by Prof. Laurent Pech and Dr Joelle Grogan). To mark our anniversary, we have issued this Research Compilation bringing together the Main Bibliography on DEM-DEC (issued 24 June 2018) and all 11 monthly Global Research Updates issued to date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Social and Solidarity Economy in Reducing Social Exclusion BUDAPEST CONFERENCE REPORT
    The Role of the Social and Solidarity Economy in Reducing Social Exclusion BUDAPEST CONFERENCE REPORT 1–2 JUNE 2017 Department of Trade, Investment and Innovation (TII) Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, 1400 Vienna, Austria Email: [email protected] www.unido.org 1 © UNIDO 2017. All rights reserved. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “de- veloped”, “industrialized” or “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by Olga Memedovic, Theresa Rueth and Brigitt Roveti, of the Business Environment, Cluster and Innovation Division (BCI) in the UNIDO Department of Trade, Investment and Innovation (TII) and edited by Georgina Wilde. The report has bene- fited from the contributions of keynote speakers and panellists during the Budapest Conference on the Role of the Social and Solidarity Economy in Reducing Social Exclusion, organized by UNIDO and the Ministry for National Economy of Hungary, held on 1–2 June 2017. The organization of the Conference benefitted from the support of H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning As Large-Scale Practical Project
    Belgeo Revue belge de géographie 3 | 2002 Governance and geography Spatial planning as large-scale practical project: the problem of effective governance Ruimtelijke planning als grootschalig praktisch project: het probleem van effectieve governance Pieter Saey Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/15763 DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.15763 ISSN: 2294-9135 Publisher: National Committee of Geography of Belgium, Société Royale Belge de Géographie Printed version Date of publication: 30 September 2002 Number of pages: 295-310 ISSN: 1377-2368 Electronic reference Pieter Saey, « Spatial planning as large-scale practical project: the problem of effective governance », Belgeo [Online], 3 | 2002, Online since 01 October 2002, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/belgeo/15763 ; DOI : 10.4000/belgeo.15763 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. Belgeo est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Spatial planning as large-scale practical project: the problem of effective g... 1 Spatial planning as large-scale practical project: the problem of effective governance Ruimtelijke planning als grootschalig praktisch project: het probleem van effectieve governance Pieter Saey 1 (Spatial) planning is a form of methodical decision-making rather than the preparation of sound decisions, as was contended for a long time (Houthaeve, 1999, pp. 95-122). I take this to be a clear answer to the question asked by Kreukels back in 1980, whether steering of reality is a derivative of the stipulations of a plan, or, on the other hand, whether formation of plans is a derivative of the necessity of decision-making on the matters concerned (Kreukels, 1980, pp.
    [Show full text]