Unmasked Potential for Munis in 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unmasked Potential for Munis in 2021 Unmasked potential for munis in 2021 Our outlook for municipals this year BlackRock’s municipal bond experts share their market outlook and the actions you can take to raise your portfolio’s potential in 2021. Peter Hayes, Head of the Municipal Bonds Group Sean Carney, Head of Municipal Strategy The assets that command demand 138% of its outflows from the March selloff, while the Even as the pandemic spurred the most abrupt and severe high yield sector regained only 37%. In our view, high selloff of modern history, the S&P Municipal Bond Index yield is poised to readily outperform investment grade. finished 2020 with a gain of 4.95% as strong demand for Nevertheless, investors need to be highly selective as the muni bonds broadly outpaced supply. We expect the impact of the pandemic varies across market segments positive momentum to continue in the coming year, albeit and issuers. with moderated returns. Demand for munis has remained durable Municipal bond mutual funds have attracted positive Net flows into municipal bond mutual funds flows from investors in each of the past seven years — 100 since the extreme rate volatility infamously known as the “Taper Tantrum” stressed fixed income assets broadly in 80 2013. Demand for municipal bonds continues to be supported by highly accommodative monetary policy, while the potential for higher taxes under the new political 60 regime underscores the appeal of tax-advantaged investments. Notching a solid return for a tumultuous 40 2020 also bodes well for munis in the months ahead as positive returns tend to create further demand. 20 Billion Some volatility in fund flows can be expected given the 0 forecast for low- to mid-single-digit returns and the likelihood of interest rates moving modestly higher and -20 creating a steeper yield curve. Nevertheless, we anticipate another year of net positive flows into the asset class. -40 We view high yield municipals as a particularly appealing area to look for opportunities in 2021. The sector has -60 lagged in the broader muni rebound from the pandemic- ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 ‘19 ‘20 induced selloff, suggesting the potential existence of underpriced assets and room to move higher. By the end Source: Investment Company Institute, as of 12/31/2020. of 2020, investment grade municipals had recouped Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The index returns are shown for illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. January 2021 | Municipal market outlook USRRMH0121U/S-1480478-1/4 Municipals have provided consistent income over time Composition of annual total return 15 10 5 0 nnual return -5 -10 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 ● Coupon return ● Price return Source: BlackRock, above data reflects annual returns on the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, as of 12/31/20. Supply remains robust but more diverse a reduced amount of tax-exempt issuance, further strengthening the positive technical environment for Supply is likely to remain elevated this year albeit not to tax-exempt municipals. the extent believed prior to the Georgia runoff elections. Historically low interest rates create a favorable We expect another year of net-negative issuance in the environment for issuing debt. We anticipate annual tax-exempt space (i.e., when the total amount of debt issuance in the range of $450-475 billion, albeit with that is called, refunded or reaches maturity exceeds the periods of volatility, and continued strong demand to amount of newly issued debt). This tailwind has occurred absorb it. (Demand creates supply in credit markets.) more frequently in recent years versus the seasonal trends that once provided some degree of predictability. More important than the amount of issuance, however, is its underlying composition. Taxable municipals, which had As a new and more centralized administration steps into historically represented a very small portion of total muni office, we anticipate a renewed focus on infrastructure. issuance, have become a meaningful contingent since the The impact on muni issuance is likely to be minimal, ability for issuers to advance refund their debt via tax- absent a significant subsidized program similar to the exempt issuance was eliminated as part of the tax reform Build America Bond program that rolled out in 2009. in 2017. The probability of the new administration restoring the advance refunding exemption will have a Strategy insights for a volatile 2021 large influence on the amount of taxable municipal debt Volatility is a central theme of our 2021 outlook given the issued this year; however, under current tax law, we project myriad of uncertainties around the spread of COVID, the taxable bonds constituting 30% of municipal issuance in success of rapidly developed vaccines, the timing of a fully 2021. The increasing amount of taxable issuance implies re-opened economy, and the effectiveness of government Elevated issuance with more taxable bonds, which stimulus. While interest rates are set to remain broadly low, supports tax-exempt technicals we expect a further increase when economic activity returns Composition of total annual municipal issuance to normal. Municipals tend to outperform Treasuries when rates rise, retaining the appeal of the asset class even for 500 investors holding the most skeptical views on yields. 400 0 Despite higher volatility in rates, flows and issuance, we expect demand for municipals to remain durable and 300 continue to outpace elevated supply in 2021. We anticipate low- to mid-single-digit returns for the asset class, with notable contributions from the high yield 200 Billion sector both in terms of income generation and outperformance versus investment grade. Security 100 selection will be paramount given increased performance disparity among market segments. 0 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021* We begin 2021 with a neutral stance on duration (interest ● Taxexempt ● Taxable rate risk) and a “barbell” yield curve positioning, i.e., Source: SourceMedia, BlackRock, as of 12/31/2020. *BlackRock forecast. heavier exposure to short- and long-term bonds vs. 2 USRRMH0121U/S-1480478-2/4 intermediate terms. We hold an overweight to credit What’s trending in taxes. States in the mountain west sectors and particularly high yield. In anticipation of an and mid-south that benefit from low tax burdens and a economic restart, we favor travel-related areas that could highly educated labor force with the ability to work from benefit from pent-up demand. We also hold a preference home are well situated. Caution is warranted in high-tax for local communities with strong housing demand in states and their large cities that are vulnerable to Colorado, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina. corporate flight and outmigration if remote working becomes the new norm. At the local level, demand for We believe the municipal bond market will continue to offer homes in suburban areas is driving property values, and attractive opportunities in the year ahead, but if there’s one consequently, tax receipts higher, buoying the thing investors learned in 2020, it’s the importance of fundamental outlook for local governments and school prudent risk management, flexibility and expertise to districts. Pension funding levels remain problematic for a navigate an increasingly diverse and volatile marketplace. handful of municipal issuers, although in our view, this Credit views for 2021 concern does not have to be addressed in the near term, especially given the strong investment performance Budgets in recovery. The pandemic has taken its toll on across the capital markets. 2020 budgets for state and local governments. Lockdowns curtailed revenue collections while the High hopes for high yield. Despite dramatic expansion of social programs and the spike in underperformance last March and April when the S&P unemployment drove spending well above forecasts. Municipal High Yield Index dropped -11.2%, the high yield Whereas a resurgence of the virus and further lockdowns sector finished 2020 with a strong gain of 6.00%, besting are worrisome, there are plenty of reasons to believe 2021 the broader S&P Municipal Bond Index by 1.05%. We will be a year of recovery for U.S. public finance: the roll anticipate that high yield will outperform again in 2021 out of vaccines, an economic boost from pent-up demand, with the tailwinds of low rates, limited supply, improving the resiliency of sales and income taxes, strength in U.S. fundamentals, attractive credit spreads, and the reversal housing and equity markets, and very low borrowing rates. of flows alongside investors’ increased risk appetite. Additionally, we believe the new administration will be Credits with measurable cash flows such as tobacco, more supportive to state and local governments and COFINA (Puerto Rico sales tax bonds), corporates and willing to provide stimulus as necessary. established retirement community bonds should be favored. We believe there is significant value in the Puerto Bargains await. Continued downgrades in municipal Rico general obligation and electric power authority (aka ratings are anticipated. This typically drives credit spreads PREPA) bonds, which are expected to be restructured wider, creating prospects to buy solid credits that are this year. Conversely, careful diligence is required before poised to benefit from the recovery. Sharp rebounds are investing in segments deeply impacted by COVID such likely in travel destination cities, the airports that serve as long-term care facilities, small universities and highly them, and dedicated hotel tax bonds in those markets. speculative start-up projects. Overall, we remain Hospitals that are experiencing compressed margins constructive on high yield municipals for their coinciding with the pandemic will mend when their diversification benefits, high levels of income and the volumes shift back to normal. Likewise, most colleges and potential to be rewarded for superior security selection. student housing issuers are looking forward to the return of students this fall.
Recommended publications
  • BIS Working Papers No 532 Mortgage Risk and the Yield Curve
    BIS Working Papers No 532 Mortgage risk and the yield curve by Aytek Malkhozov, Philippe Mueller, Andrea Vedolin and Gyuri Venter Monetary and Economic Department December 2015 JEL classification: G12, G21, E43 Keywords: Term Structure of Interest Rates, MBS, Supply Factor BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2015. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) Mortgage Risk and the Yield Curve∗ Aytek Malkhozov† Philippe Mueller‡ Andrea Vedolin§ Gyuri Venter¶ Abstract We study the feedback from the risk of outstanding mortgage-backed secu- rities (MBS) on the level and volatility of interest rates. We incorporate the supply shocks resulting from changes in MBS duration into a parsimonious equilibrium dynamic term structure model and derive three predictions that are strongly supported in the data: (i) MBS duration positively predicts nominal and real excess bond returns, especially for longer maturities; (ii) the predictive power of MBS duration is transitory in nature; and (iii) MBS convexity increases interest
    [Show full text]
  • WHY DOES the YIELD CURVE PREDICT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY? Dissecting the Evidence for Germany and the United States
    BIS WORKING PAPERS No. 49 WHY DOES THE YIELD CURVE PREDICT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY? Dissecting the evidence for Germany and the United States by Frank Smets and Kostas Tsatsaronis September 1997 BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS Monetary and Economic Department BASLE BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. © Bank for International Settlements 1997 CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland Also available on the BIS World Wide Web site (http://www.bis.org). All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 WHY DOES THE YIELD CURVE PREDICT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY? Dissecting the evidence for Germany and the United States by Frank Smets and Kostas Tsatsaronis * September 1997 Abstract This paper investigates why the slope of the yield curve predicts future economic activity in Germany and the United States. A structural VAR is used to identify aggregate supply, aggregate demand, monetary policy and inflation scare shocks and to analyse their effects on the real, nominal and term premium components of the term spread and on output. In both countries demand and monetary policy shocks contribute to the covariance between output growth and the lagged term spread, while inflation scares do not. As the latter are more important in the United States, they reduce the predictive content of the term spread in that country.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Yield Curve
    Notes on the yield curve Ian Martin Steve Ross∗ September, 2018 Abstract We study the properties of the yield curve under the assumptions that (i) the fixed-income market is complete and (ii) the state vector that drives interest rates follows a finite discrete-time Markov chain. We focus in particular on the relationship between the behavior of the long end of the yield curve and the recovered time discount factor and marginal utilities of a pseudo-representative agent; and on the relationship between the \trappedness" of an economy and the convergence of yields at the long end. JEL code: G12. Keywords: yield curve, term structure, recovery theorem, traps, Cheeger inequality, eigenvalue gap. ∗Ian Martin (corresponding author): London School of Economics, London, UK, [email protected]. Steve Ross: MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MA. We are grateful to Dave Backus, Ravi Bansal, John Campbell, Mike Chernov, Darrell Duffie, Lars Hansen, Ken Singleton, Leifu Zhang, and to participants at the TIGER Forum and at the SITE conference for their comments. Ian Martin is grateful for support from the ERC under Starting Grant 639744. 1 In this paper, we present some theoretical results on the properties of the long end of the yield curve. Our results relate to two literatures. The first is the Recovery Theorem of Ross (2015). Ross showed that, given a matrix of Arrow{Debreu prices, it is possible to infer the objective state transition probabilities and marginal utilities. Although it is a familiar fact that sufficiently rich asset price data pins down the risk-neutral probabilities, it is initially surprising that we can do the same for the objective, or real-world, probabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Warning to Bond Bears
    A warning to bond bears Curt Custard | UBS Global Asset Management | July 2014 American bond bulls are a hardy species. A bond bull born in the early 1980s would have enjoyed a healthy life over at least three decades in the US. Why should other countries care about US bond yields? The topic matters for investors everywhere, since US Treasuries are the world’s biggest bond market, and to some extent set the pace for global bond markets – witness the global jump in yields when the Federal Reserve surprised investors with talk of ‘tapering’ in June 2013. And on days when bond yields jump up, equities tend to jump down – again, we saw this in global equities markets in June 2013. Every investor should therefore care about the future direction of US bond markets. The bull market that started when 10- year US Treasury yields peaked in 1981 may or may not be over. The 10-year yield dropped to a record low of 1.4% in July 2012. Was that a trough that won’t be revisited for decades, or just the latest in a succession of new records in a secular bull market that is still going? It’s too early to say. Many commentators had made up their minds by the end of last year. As we closed 2013, most investors looked at their checklist of factors that hurt US government bond prices. Improving economy? Check. Falling unemployment? Check. Tapering of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve? Check. And so on – other factors such as steep yield curves and low real yields also supported the ‘safe bet’ that yields would go higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Fear the Inverted Yield Curve?
    PAGE ONE Economics® Should We Fear the Inverted Yield Curve? Diego Mendez-Carbajo, Ph.D., Senior Economic Education Specialist GLOSSARY “What, me worry?” Bond: A certificate of indebtedness issued —Alfred E. Neuman (MAD magazine) by a government or corporation. Coupon (of bonds): The regular payments received by the buyer of a bond. On August 14, 2019, news outlets widely carried news of a “yield curve Face value (of bonds): The dollar amount inversion.” Stock market indexes dramatically dropped in value, and Google paid to the bond holder when a bond searches for the word “recession” peaked. What is the yield curve? How matures. does it invert? Why does it matter? Should we worry about it? Maturity (of bonds): The time period during which a bond makes coupon payments. U.S. Bonds and Yields Yield curve: A graph that shows the yields of bonds with different maturity dates. Both the federal government and corporations borrow money by selling bonds when their expenses are larger than their revenue. Bonds are certifi- Yield (of bonds): The return from owning a bond. It depends on the price paid for cates of indebtedness (i.e., IOUs) entitling the buyer of the bond to a regular the bond, its coupon payments, and its stream of payments (called coupons) for a period of time (called maturity). face value. The time until the last payment is called the remaining maturity of the bond. When a bond matures, the issuer of the bond returns to the buyer of the bond the amount borrowed (called the face value of the bond).
    [Show full text]
  • Yield Curves and the Recession Expectations
    Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences Yılmaz, 2020: 06 (03) BNEJSS Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Yield Curves and the Recession Expectations Rasim Yılmaz1 1Prof.Dr., Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0002-1084-8705 Abstract: The curve representing the returns of bonds bearing the same risk, liquidity and tax conditions but with different maturities is called yield curve. The yield curve typically slopes upward, i.e. longer-maturity assets have a higher return than shorter-maturity assets, due to the fact that investors demand a premium to hold a bond or a note for a longer period. The premium is demanded for risks such as inflation and other uncertainties that can develop over time. A flatter yield curve signals concerns about the future economic outlook while an inverted yield curve is considered as a warning sign about the future economic outlook. When the short-term asset rates rise above the rates on long-term assets, i.e. the spread is negative, yield curve inversions occur. Interest rates increases in periods of economic expansion, while interest rates decrease in periods of economic recession. The horizontal and negative slope of the yield curve indicates that short- term interest rates are expected to fall. Therefore, the economy is expected to enter a recession. The recent flattening and inversion of the yield curve in the USA have triggered the discussions about the recession expectations in the USA. Key Words: Yield Curve, Recession, Globalization 1. INTRODUCTION Figure 1: The Slope of Yield Curves Risk, liquidity and tax conditions (risk structure) affect the interest rates of the bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Forecasts with the Yield Curve Michael D
    FRBSF Economic Letter 2018-07 | March 5, 2018 | Research from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Forecasts with the Yield Curve Michael D. Bauer and Thomas M. Mertens The term spread—the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates—is a strikingly accurate predictor of future economic activity. Every U.S. recession in the past 60 years was preceded by a negative term spread, that is, an inverted yield curve. Furthermore, a negative term spread was always followed by an economic slowdown and, except for one time, by a recession. While the current environment is somewhat special—with low interest rates and risk premiums—the power of the term spread to predict economic slowdowns appears intact. One of the most pervasive relationships in macroeconomics is that between the term spread—the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates—and future economic activity. A negative term spread, that is, an inverted yield curve, reliably predicts low future output growth and indicates a high probability of recession (Rudebusch and Williams 2009). This relationship holds not only in the United States but also for a number of other advanced economies (Estrella and Mishkin 1997). The term spread is one of the most reliable predictors of future economic activity among a wide range of economic and financial indicators and, as such, is closely watched by professional forecasters and policymakers alike. Over most of the current recovery, particularly in 2017, the yield curve has flattened. As of the end of February, the difference between the ten-year and one-year Treasury yields stands at only 0.8%.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF (NYSE Ticker: IVOL)
    An Overview of the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF (NYSE Ticker: IVOL) About Quadratic Capital Management Quadratic Capital Management is an innovative asset management firm founded in 2013 by Nancy Davis. The firm has utilized its significant expertise in the interest rate volatility and options markets to construct IVOL. Why IVOL? Many portfolios limit their exposure to stocks and bonds. IVOL accesses the U.S. Government and OTC rates markets. The OTC rates market is nearly five times larger than the stock market. The IVOL ETF provides diversification to an often inaccessible part of the market that is very different from stock and bond portfolios. [email protected] 1 The Quadratic Team and IVOL Partners The Quadratic Team Nancy Davis Glenn Christal Henrique Rocha Brooke Farley CIO & Managing Partner COO & CCO Market Strategist Business Development 21 Years of Experience 32 Years of Experience 10 Years of Experience 30 Years of Experience • Head of Credit, • Treasurer of Tudor, 15 • Goldman Sachs Rates • Former McKinsey Derivatives and OTC years and FX Strategist Research consultant Trading for Goldman • COO of Millennium • Investment experience at • MIA from Columbia Sachs Prop Desk Partners firms in both Brazil and University School of • Highbridge Capital and the U.S. International Affairs AllianceBernstein IVOL Partners Fund Listing ETF Custodian ETF Platform Administration Exchange Auditors 2 The IVOL Ecosystem NAV-Based Creates Market Orders Investor Large Institutions RIA’s Individuals Execution Authorized Participants Individual Brokerage Account Function of the value of the Function of the value of ETF shares Liquidity underlying asset that backs traded the ETF Flexible supply - shares can Trading the ETF shares that currently Shares be "created" or "redeemed" to exist offset changes in demand 3 Dilemmas currently faced by investors • Investors need income yet rates are very low globally Data from Bloomberg as of 04/30/2020.
    [Show full text]
  • PIMCO's Capital Market Assumptions, June 2020
    IN DEPTH • JUN 2020 PIMCO’s Capital Market Assumptions, June 2020. Executive Summary PIMCO traditionally updates our Capital Market Assumptions at the end of June and December, but we’ve advanced this release given the pandemic and the extreme volatility that resulted. We now expect the U.S. cash rate to average just slightly higher than zero over the secular horizon, a dramatic downshift from the fourth quarter of last year, while we’ve increased our long-term outlook for most credit sectors amid a general widening in credit spreads. Other forecasts include: • Somewhat low U.S. Treasury yields and returns by historical standards • A favorable long-term outlook for various credit sectors on both an absolute return and Sharpe ratio basis • A modestly higher expected return for Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) relative to Treasuries • A generally favorable long-term outlook for non-U.S. developed market and emerging market currencies given our view of a relatively expensive U.S. dollar today • A favorable outlook for emerging markets due to relatively attractive valuations in terms of credit spreads and equity yields, despite the potential for greater volatility. When we last updated our capital market assumptions (CMAs) Markets continued to decline in early March as the U.S. in Q4 2019, we were generally cautious on risk assets, given the government began to mandate unprecedented shutdowns of long-running risk appetite that investors had exhibited over the businesses and impose shelter-in-place requirements in an past decade. Last year was no exception to this secular trend, attempt to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • OR03/2021 Exchange Traded Funds Thematic Note
    Exchange Traded Funds Thematic Note - Findings and Observations during COVID-19 induced market stresses Public Report The Board OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS OR03 AUGUST 2021 The unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic brought severe shock to the financial markets. At the height of the market turmoil in March and April 2020, exchange traded funds (ETFs) in various markets went through a stress period. This note reviews the operation and activities of the primary market and secondary market of ETFs during such a period. In particular, it explores the impact of the stress on the ETF structure and functioning, including the causes of the substantial pricing differences between some fixed income ETFs’ secondary market prices and their Net Asset Values (NAVs). It also outlines some challenging circumstances concerning some derivatives-based ETFs. The information sources drawn on by this note include, among others: • Data analysis compiled by a core research group (CRG) from IOSCO’s Committee 5 on Investment Management (C5); • Responses to a survey from 24 C5 members; and • Responses to an industry survey from 49 industry participants. By examining the aforementioned, this note seeks to review the resilience of the ETF structure during the COVID-19 volatility. Overall, available evidence, including data analytics and feedback from C5 members and industry participants, has not indicated any major risks or fragilities in the ETF structure although a subset of ETFs temporarily experienced unusual trading behaviors. The COVID-19 volatility has shed light on the resilience of most ETFs across various market segments during stressed markets. There is an emerging consensus that fixed income ETFs could provide useful pricing information to the wider market.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise As Information for Illiquidity
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES NOISE AS INFORMATION FOR ILLIQUIDITY Xing Hu Jun Pan Jiang Wang Working Paper 16468 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16468 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2010 The authors thank Adrien Verdelhan for valuable discussions. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by Xing Hu, Jun Pan, and Jiang Wang. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Noise as Information for Illiquidity Xing Hu, Jun Pan, and Jiang Wang NBER Working Paper No. 16468 October 2010 JEL No. G0 ABSTRACT We propose a broad measure of liquidity for the overall financial market by exploiting its connection with the amount of arbitrage capital in the market and the potential impact on price deviations in US Treasurys. When arbitrage capital is abundant, we expect the arbitrage forces to smooth out the Treasury yield curve and keep the dispersion low. During market crises, the shortage of arbitrage capital leaves the yields to move more freely relative to the curve, resulting in more "noise.'' As such, noise in the Treasury market can be informative and we expect this information about liquidity to reflect the broad market conditions because of the central importance of the Treasury market and its low intrinsic noise — high liquidity and low credit risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Commodity Futures Terms, Introduction to Futures Language
    NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION Glossary of Futures Terms An Introduction to the Language of the Futures Industry 1 Glossary of Futures Terms: An Introduction to the Language of the Futures Industry National Futures Association (NFA) has been designated by the Commod- ity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a registered futures asso- ciation. Its mission is to provide inno- vative regulatory programs and services that ensure futures industry integrity, protect market participants and help its members meet their regulatory responsibilities. Some of the terms included in this glossary may have complex legal or technical meanings which are beyond the scope of the booklet. However, this glossary does provide a good intro- duction to the language of the futures industry. 2 Actuals Actuals See Cash Commodity. Aggregation The policy under which all futures positions owned or controlled by one trader or a group of traders are combined to determine report- able positions and speculative limits. Arbitrage The simultaneous purchase and sale of similar commodities in different markets to take ad- vantage of a price discrepancy. Arbitration The process of settling disputes between par- ties by a person or persons chosen or agreed to by them. NFA’s arbitration program provides a forum for resolving futures-related disputes between NFA Members or between Members and customers. Associated Person (AP) An individual who solicits orders, customers or customer funds on behalf of a Futures Commission Merchant, an Introducing Broker, a Commodity Trading Advisor or a Commodity Pool Operator and who is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. At-the-Money Option An option whose strike price is equal—or approximately equal—to the current market price of the underlying futures contract.
    [Show full text]