DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume II NPWS.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume II NPWS.Pdf Mapping of Wildlife Sanctuaries and National Parks of India A Pilot Project: Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary NRSC Dr. C. Sudhakar Reddy Dr. V.K. Srivastava Dr. S. Sudhakar Dr. M.S.R. Murthy Mr. Shijo Joseph, JRF Mr. Ved Prakash Ola, Project Personnel WII Dr. V.B. Mathur TNFD Sri K. Sridharan Dr. S.K. Srivastava SURVEY OF INDIA December, 2008 Contents Page no. Chapter I – Introduction 1-20 1.1 Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary 3-9 1.2 Topography 10-20 Chapter II -Vegetation type mapping 21-39 2.1 Methodology 21-26 2.2 Results and Discussion 27-39 Chapter III –Forest Crown Density Mapping 40-53 3.1 Methodology 40-41 3.2 Results and Discussion 41-53 Chapter IV –Phytosociological study 54-72 4.1 Methodology 54-57 4.2 Results and Discussion 58-66 4.3 Gradients of Diversity 67-72 CHAPTER V-LAND COVER CHANGE ASSESSMENT 73-82 5.1 Methodology 74-76 5.2 Results and Discussions 77-82 Chapter VI - Conclusions and Recommendations 83-84 References 85-93 List of Figures Figure1.1 Location Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Figure1.2 Infrastructure Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure1.3 Administrative Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Showing Reserve Forest & Section Figure1.4 Administrative Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary showing Range Boundary and Beat Boundary Figure1.5 Elevation map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure1.6 Percent Area Distribution of Elevation in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Figure1.7 Slope Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure1.8 Percent Area Distribution of Slope in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure 1.9 Aspect Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure1.10 Percent Area Distribution of Aspect in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure1.11 Drainage Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure2.1 False Colour Composite Image of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure2.2 Vegetation types in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure2.3 Forest Vegetation type and Land-Use map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure2.4 Percent Area Distribution of Vegetation type and Land-Use in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure2.5 Percent area Distribution of Different forest types in different ranges. Figure 2.6 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Manampally Range Figure 2.7 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Manamboly Range Figure 2.8 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Polachi Range Figure 2.9 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Udumalaipettai Range Figure 2.10 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Ulandy Range Figure 2.11 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Valparai Range Figure 2.12 Forest Type and Land-Use Map of Amaravathi Range Figure3.1 Methodology Flow chart for Forest Type, Density & Bio- Richness Maps Figure3.2. Forest Canopy Density Map of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure3.3. Area Distribution of Forest Canopy Density of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure 3.4 Area Distribution of Canopy Density in different Ranges under <40% canopy Density and >40 % canopy Density Figure3.5 Area Distribution of different Forest Canopy Density Categories in Different Ranges Figure3.6 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Amaravathi Range Figure3.7 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Amaravathi Range Figure3.8 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Manamboly Range Figure3.9 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Polachi Range Figure3.10 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Udumalaipettai Range Figure3.11 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Ulandy Range Figure3.12 Forest Canopy Density and Land-Use Map of Valparai Range Figure4.1. Phytosociological sampling method Figure4.2.1 Sample Points location in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure4.2.2 Sample Points location in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Figure4.3. CCA ordination diagram (Axis 1 by Axis 2) with plots (scattered points) and environmental variables (lines) in Anamalai wildlife sanctuary. Each circle represents partitioning of vegetation communities along environmental gradients. Figure5.1. Flow diagram depicting the details of change detection technique followed in the study Figure5.2. Map showing change areas from 1973 to 2006 in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, India. List of Tables Table1.1 Range and Beat wise Geographical area of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Table1.2 Distribution of Area under different Elevation categories in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.3 Distribution of Area under different Elevation categories in different range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.4 Elevation Description of different Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.5. Area Distribution Slope Categories in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.6. Area Distribution of Slope Categories in different Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.7. Slope Description of different Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.8. Area Distribution Aspect Categories in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table1.9. Area Distribution of Aspect Categories in different Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table2.1 Forest types of Indira Gandhi Wildlife sanctuary (Champion and Seth, 1968) Table2.2 Area Statistics of Vegetation cover types in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary (Area in sq.km) Table2.3.1 Range wise area distribution of Vegetation & Land-Use type of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary (Area in sq km) Table2.3.2 Range wise area distribution of Vegetation & Land-Use type of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary (Area in sq km) Table3.1 Area Statistics of Forest Crown density in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Table3.2. Area Distribution of Canopy Density in different Ranges under <40% canopy Density and >40 % canopy Density Table3.3.1 Range wise Forest Crown density distribution Table3.3.2 Range wise Forest Crown density distribution Table4.1 Ecological dominance of top ten species (based on IVI values) in Sanctuary Table4.2 Top 10 dominant species in Dry deciduous forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.3 Top 10 dominant species in Moist deciduous forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.4 Top 10 dominant species in Evergreen forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.5 Top 10 dominant species in Semi-Evergreen forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.6 Top 10 dominant species in Shola forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.7 Top 10 dominant species in Scrub forest of Indira Gandhi WLS (Based on IVI values) Table4.8. Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Amaravathi Range Table4.9. Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Manampally Range Table4.10. Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Polachi Range Table4.11 Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Udumalaipettai Range Table4.12. Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Ulandy Range Table4.13. Five Dominant Species in different Forest Type of Valaprai Range Table4.14 Population structure of tree species along girth class frequencies Table4.15 Population structure of tree species across Height class intervals Table4.16 Endemic species of Study area Table4.17 Canonical correspondence analysis of 169 species in 206 plots in Anamalai wildlife sanctuary. Matrix presents intraset correlation between environmental variables and first three axes and weighted correlations between environmental variables. Table4.18 Overall regression model of species richness from environmental variables in Anamalai wildlife sanctuary (R2 – 0.50, F – 39.82, df1 – 5, df2 – 199 and p - 2.98E-28). Table5.1 Land use/Land cover changes (area in hectare) in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary from 1973 to 2006 List of Annexure: Annexure1 Area Distribution of Forest Canopy Density in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure2 Area Distribution of Forest Vegetation type & Land-Use in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure3 Area Distribution of Aspect in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure4 Area Distribution of Elevation in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure5 Area Distribution of Slope in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure6 Beat and Section wise area distribution of vegetation type and landuse & land cover in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure7 Beat and Section Wise Area Distribution of Forest Canopy Density in all Range of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Annexure8 Maps of Status of main Faunal Species of Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary. Annexure9 Phytosociological Sample Point Location in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary Acknowledgement The project team is grateful to Dr. V. Jayaraman, Director, NRSC, Dr. P.S. Roy, Deputy Director (RS & GIS Application Area) and Dr. R.S. Dwivedi, Group Director (LRG), NRSC for all the guidance and encouragement. We thank Director, WII for encouragement and Tamil Nadu Forest Department for cooperation in field studies. Thanks due to Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi for financial assistance. We are grateful to Mr. G. Rajasekhar and Mr. Girish S. Pujar, Scientists, NRSC for their technical cooperation and continual support. Chapter - I INTRODUCTION India is endowed with a great variety of biological communities and is ranked among twelve mega diversity countries in the world. But India’s green mantle along with its heritage of biodiversity is in grave trouble today due to population explosion, encroachment to forest land, shifting cultivation practices and degradation caused by overgrazing, illicit felling, lopping, for fuel and folder, forest fire, etc. The formulation of Protected Area is a regular practice for the conservation of biodiversity from these threats. But many times Protected Area has not been fulfil its objectives as there is no base line data about major habitats and its species composition, ecological significance and threatening factors in the area. Wherever little data exits, it is not in a standardized form to address the management issues. The lack of baseline data is hampering the conservation and management of the protected area significantly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu Connie Smith Tamil Nadu Overview
    Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu Connie Smith Tamil Nadu Overview Tamil Nadu is bordered by Pondicherry, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Sri Lanka, which has a significant Tamil minority, lies off the southeast coast. Tamil Nadu, with its traceable history of continuous human habitation since pre-historic times has cultural traditions amongst the oldest in the world. Colonised by the East India Company, Tamil Nadu was eventually incorporated into the Madras Presidency. After the independence of India, the state of Tamil Nadu was created in 1969 based on linguistic boundaries. The politics of Tamil Nadu has been dominated by DMK and AIADMK, which are the products of the Dravidian movement that demanded concessions for the 'Dravidian' population of Tamil Nadu. Lying on a low plain along the southeastern coast of the Indian peninsula, Tamil Nadu is bounded by the Eastern Ghats in the north and Nilgiri, Anai Malai hills and Palakkad (Palghat Gap) on the west. The state has large fertile areas along the Coromandel coast, the Palk strait, and the Gulf of Mannar. The fertile plains of Tamil Nadu are fed by rivers such as Kaveri, Palar and Vaigai and by the northeast monsoon. Traditionally an agricultural state, Tamil Nadu is a leading producer of agricultural products. Tribal Population As per 2001 census, out of the total state population of 62,405,679, the population of Scheduled Castes is 11,857,504 and that of Scheduled Tribes is 651,321. This constitutes 19% and 1.04% of the total population respectively.1 Further, the literacy level of the Adi Dravidar is only 63.19% and that of Tribal is 41.53%.
    [Show full text]
  • Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY-U)
    Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY-U) Proposal for 146 projects under Vertical III & IV Presented to 33rd CSMC meeting on 27.04.2018 Government of Tamil Nadu SLNA – Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board PROGRESS OF PMAY (U) Indicators Current Status (No.) § Cities Approved 666 § Demand Survey Completed 666 § Total Demand (as on 31.08.2017) ISSR - 47,309 (as per Demand Survey ,CSC and Online) CLSS - 4,84,105 13,91,609 AHP - 3,41,832 BLC - 5,18,363 § Whether HFAPoA Submitted HFAPoAs for 666 cities /Towns have been submitted to GoI for approval § Whether AIP Submitted Submitted along with HFAPoAs § Whether HFAPoA & AIP entered in MIS In progress ASSESSED HOUSING DEMAND Total GoI Share Vertical 1 – ISSR 2 – CLSS 3 – AHP 4 - BLC requirement (Rs. In Cr.) Demand for 666 Statutory 47,309 4,84,105 3,41,832 5,18,363 13,91,609 26301.62 Towns HOUSING ASSESSMENT ULB WISE Vertical ULB Total 1- ISSR 2- CLSS 3 - AHP 4 - BLC Greater Chennai 23516 110574 125203 92512 351805 Corporation 11 20587 94274 66469 103915 285245 Corporations 124 3206 219065 116626 157620 496517 Municipalities 528 0 58801 32934 163110 254845 Town Panchayats 2 Cantonment 0 1391 600 1206 3347 Boards Total 47309 484105 341832 518363 1391609 (666 ULBs) Demand Survey Vs Approval Demand Survey Units approved so far ISSR - 47309 ISSR - 0 Total- CLSS- Total- AHP- CLSS- 1391609 AHP- 4749 58721 484105 341832 424886 100% 0.98% 30.53 % 17.18 % BLC- BLC- 366165 518363 70.64% PROGRESS OF PMAY (U) Indicators Current Status § SLTC/CLTC staff approved vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Nature Conservation Foundation
    Final report Effect of habitat fragmentation on Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) ecology and behaviour patterns in a conflict-prone plantation landscape of the Anamalai hills, Western Ghats, India M. ANANDA KUMAR Submitted to Rufford Maurice Laing Foundation, UK June 2006 In partnership with nature conservation foundation Contents Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 Chapter 1: Project background 6 Chapter 2: Spatial patterns of elephant distribution, habitat use, and conflicts 9 Chapter 3: Behaviour of elephants in the human dominated landscape of the 16 Valparai plateau Chapter 4: Human-elephant relationships and conflicts on the Valparai plateau 21 Conclusions and Recommendations 25 References 26 Appendix 1 28 2 Acknowledgements This project benefited greatly from a large number of people and institutions. I would particularly like to thank: The Rufford Maurice Laing Foundation, UK, for the Small Grant for Nature Conservation for financial support Josh Cole, Programme Officer, who provided much help and support during the project The Tamil Nadu Forest Department, particularly the Chief Wildlife Warden, C. K. Sreedharan, the Wildlife Warden of the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, K. Varadarajan, Range Officers G. Sivamani and A. Murthy, and various field staff for their support and encouragement The Anamalai Biodiversity Conservation Association for their support for this project to work in the private lands Plantation managers and field staff of various companies, particularly D. G. Hegde, Arjun Sanadi, J. T. Kamdin, Robin Rozario, Oliver Praveenkumar, Kaushik Subramani, Mahesh John, H. C. Malpani, for their cooperation and support Mewa Singh, Ajith Kumar, Werner Kaumanns, Anindya Sinha, Divya Mudappa, T. R. Shankar Raman, M. D.
    [Show full text]
  • Coimbatore Commissionerate Jurisdiction
    Coimbatore Commissionerate Jurisdiction The jurisdiction of Coimbatore Commissionerate will cover the areas covering the entire Districts of Coimbatore, Nilgiris and the District of Tirupur excluding Dharapuram, Kangeyam taluks and Uthukkuli Firka and Kunnathur Firka of Avinashi Taluk * in the State of Tamil Nadu. *(Uthukkuli Firka and Kunnathur Firka are now known as Uthukkuli Taluk). Location | 617, A.T.D. STR.EE[, RACE COURSE, COIMBATORE: 641018 Divisions under the jurisdiction of Coimbatore Commissionerate Sl.No. Divisions L. Coimbatore I Division 2. Coimbatore II Division 3. Coimbatore III Division 4. Coimbatore IV Division 5. Pollachi Division 6. Tirupur Division 7. Coonoor Division Page 47 of 83 1. Coimbatore I Division of Coimbatore Commissionerate: Location L44L, ELGI Building, Trichy Road, COIMBATORT- 641018 AreascoveringWardNos.l to4,LO to 15, 18to24and76 to79of Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation limit and Jurisdiction Perianaickanpalayam Firka, Chinna Thadagam, 24-Yeerapandi, Pannimadai, Somayampalayam, Goundenpalayam and Nanjundapuram villages of Thudiyalur Firka of Coimbatore North Taluk and Vellamadai of Sarkar Samakulam Firka of Coimbatore North Taluk of Coimbatore District . Name of the Location Jurisdiction Range Areas covering Ward Nos. 10 to 15, 20 to 24, 76 to 79 of Coimbatore Municipal CBE Corporation; revenue villages of I-A Goundenpalayam of Thudiyalur Firka of Coimbatore North Taluk of Coimbatore 5th Floor, AP Arcade, District. Singapore PIaza,333 Areas covering Ward Nos. 1 to 4 , 18 Cross Cut Road, Coimbatore Municipal Coimbatore -641012. and 19 of Corporation; revenue villages of 24- CBE Veerapandi, Somayampalayam, I-B Pannimadai, Nanjundapuram, Chinna Thadagam of Thudiyalur Firka of Coimbatore North Taluk of Coimbatore District. Areas covering revenue villages of Narasimhanaickenpalayam, CBE Kurudampalayam of r-c Periyanaickenpalayam Firka of Coimbatore North Taluk of Coimbatore District.
    [Show full text]
  • Udumalpet Local Planning Area - Inclusion of Additional Areas Under Section 10(1) (B) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 – Intention - Notified
    ABSTRACT Local Planning Area – Udumalpet Local Planning Area - Inclusion of additional areas under section 10(1) (b) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 – Intention - Notified. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Housing and Urban Development [UD 4(2)] Department ANDUHORBAN HOUDEVELOPMENT (UD4(1)) DEPARTMENT G.O.(Ms).No.143 Dated:18.06.2013 é#a tUl«, Må §fŸ 04, ÂUtŸSt® M©L 2044 Read: 1. G.O.Ms.No.2076, Rural Development and Local Administration Department, dated 22.9.1973. 2. G.O.Ms.No.683, Rural Development and Local Administration Department, dated 16.3.1974. Read also: 3. From the Commissioner of Town and Country Planning, Letter Na.Ka.No.9858/2010/MP2, dated 10.8.2010. 4. From the Director of Town and Country Planning letter Na.Ka.No.9858/2010/MP2, dated 02.02.2012. = = = = = = ORDER: The Director of Town and Country Planning in his letter third read above, has requested the Government to include surrounding villages in Udumalpet Local Planning Area under section 10(1) (b) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (Tamil Nadu Act 35 of 1972) since the area nearby Udumalpet is developing in a fast manner. 2. The Government after careful examination of the proposal of Director of Town and Country Planning in para 1 above have decided to declare the intention of the Government to include additional areas in the Udumalpet Local Planning Area. The appended notification will be published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette. 3. The Collector of Tiruppur District is directed to republish the notification in the District Gazette.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinnapatti Village, Udumalaipettai Taluk' Tiruppur District' Tamil Nadu by Thiru
    , STATE EXPERT APPMISAL COMMITTEE _ TAMIL NADU Agenda No: 192-Ol (File Nol-722a/2O2O) Propored Gravel quarry leare over an e)dent of l.2O.O Ha at S.F.Not'22nA and 22/18' Thinnapatti Village, Udumalaipettai Taluk' Tiruppur District' Tamil Nadu by Thiru. A. Chinnatamy - For Environmentalclearance (srvTN/MrN/I70977 /2O2O dated 02.O9.2O2O\ The propotal was placed for appraital in thit lg2^dmeeting of SEAC held on 07.O1.2O21. The detailr of the proiect furnithed by the ProPonent are available on the webtite (parivesh.nic.in). During initial ditcusriont the SEAC noted that the online number of the apPlication mentioned in the agenda litt forwarded to SEAC mismatch with that of the number rhown during pretentation. The engineer informed that the earlier application wat withdrawn by the proponent and a new aPplication hat been filed on PARIVESH web portal. When the committee tought clarification from the consultant in thit re8ard, he informed that the earlier application was filed with propotal for 3m dePth of mininB and later decided to seek approval for 2m depth. And continued that, at there i5 no proviJion to make correctiont in the application already filed on PARIVESH by the proPonent' it war withdrawn and a new application with redu(ed depth of mining has been filed. AccordinSly it was taken for consideration by the commiftee and decided to inform SEIAA to close and record the previoutapplication. The project proponent Save detailed pretentation of the Proiect. SEAC noted the followinS: I. The Project Proponent, Thiru. A. Chinnasamy hai apPlied teeking Environmental Clearance for the proposed Gravel quarry lea5e over an extent of 1.20.0 Ha at S.F.Nos.22l1A and 22llB.
    [Show full text]
  • 438] Chennai, Wednesday, November 27, 2019 Karthigai 11, Vikari, Thiruvalluvar Aandu–2050 Part V—Section 4
    © [Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14 GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [R. Dis. No. 197/2009. 2019 [Price: Rs. 10.40 Paise. TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 438] CHENNAI, Wednesday, NOVEMBER 27, 2019 Karthigai 11, Vikari, Thiruvalluvar Aandu–2050 Part V—Section 4 Notification by the Election Commission of India NoTIfICaTIoNs by ThE ElECTIoN CommIssIoN of INDIa AMENDMENT TO THE LIST OF ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICERS FOR THE ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU No. sRo G-57/2019 The following Notification of the Election Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110 001, dated 19th November, 2019 [28 (Kartika, 1941 (Saka)] is published:- No. 429/TN/2019 (2) - In pursuance of the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 13 (B) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (43 of 1950), the Election Commission of India in consultation with the Government of Tamil Nadu hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification No. 429/TN/2008(2), dated 18-06-2008 as amended from time to time, relating to the appointment of Electoral Registration Officers, for Assembly Constituencies in the State of Tamil Nadu namely. In column (2) of the Table appended to the said Notification, for the existing entries mentioned against the Assembly Constituencies shown in the column (1), the following entries shall be substituted. Table No. and Name of the Electoral Registration Officers Assembly Constituency (1) (2) 38.Arakkonam (SC) Sub-Collector/Assistant Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet
    [Show full text]
  • TAMILNADU NAME of the DISTRICT : CHENNAI Division: Thiruvanmiyur 1 Hotel Saravana Bhavan Hotel Saravana Bhavan, Perungudi, Chennai-96
    DETAILS OF DHABA'S IN TAMILNADU NAME OF THE DISTRICT : CHENNAI Division: Thiruvanmiyur 1 Hotel Saravana Bhavan Hotel Saravana Bhavan, Perungudi, Chennai-96. 7823973052 2 Hotel Hot Chips Hotel Hot Chips, ECR Road, Chennai-41 044-2449698 3 Yaa Moideen Briyani Yaa Moideen Briyani, ECR Road, Chennai-41 044-43838315 4 Kuppana Hotel Junior Kuppana, OMR, Chennai-96 044-224545959 Sree Madurai Devar Hotel, Porur Toll-8, NH Road 5 Sree Madurai Devar Hotel 72993 87778 Porur, Toll Gate Vanagarm, Porur, Chennai. Hotel Madurai Pandiyan, Porur Toll No.49, Bye Pass 6 Hotel Madurai Pandiyan road, Om sakthi nager, Maduravoyal, NR Tool Gate, 98841 83534 Chennai-95. Briyani Dream Porur Toll-39, Om Sakthi Nager, Porur 7 Briyani Dream 75500 60033 road, Chennai-95. Hotel Bypass Orient Porur Toll Bo.12B, Swami 8 Hotel BypassOrient 98411 92606 Vivekandar road bypass, Chennai-116 District: KANCHIPURAM Division : Kanchipuram New Panjabi Dhaba, Chennai to Bengalure Highway, 9 Rajendiran 9786448787 Rajakulam, Kanchipuram New Punjabi Dhaba, Chennai to Bengalure Highway, 10 Rajendiran 9786448787 Vedal, Kanchipuram, 9080772817 11 Punjab Dhaba Punjabi Dhaba, White Gate, Kanchipuram 9600407219 12 JP Hotels J P Hotels, Baluchettichatram, Kanchipuram, Hotel Sakthi Ganapathi, White Gate, Chennai to 13 Sakthi Ganapathi Hotel 9003855555 Bengalure Highway, Kanchipuram Hotel Ramanas, Chennai to Bengalure Highway, 14 Guru 9443311222 Kilambi, Kanchipuram Division: TAMBARAM AL-Taj Hotel, GST Road, Peerkan karanai, Chennai- 15 K.Thameem Ansari 9840687210 63 Division: SRIPERUMBUTHUR
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT LEVEL Agro Meteorological Advisory Bulletin for the State of Tamil Nadu Bulletin No
    !जला !रत$मलनाडुके !लएकृ&ष मौसमसलाहकारबुले,टन DISTRICT LEVEL Agro meteorological Advisory Bulletin for the state of Tamil Nadu Bulletin No. 051 /2017 For the period 0830 IST, 27th June 2017 to 0830 IST, 30th June 2017 th Issued on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 Issued by DDGM, Regional Meteorological Centre, India Meteorological Department, Chennai in collaboration with TNAU and nine AMFU’s of Agro climatic Zones of the Tamil Nadu state Agro climatic zones of the state Agro met Sl. Agro climatic field Unit Districts No zone (AMFU) location Northeastern Kanchipuram, Tiruvallur, Cuddalore 1 Tiruvannamalai, Chennai,Villupuram , Chennai zone Vellore Northwestern Dharmapuri, Krishnagiri, Salem and 2 Namakkal zone Namakkal Western 3 Erode,Tiuppur and Coimbatore, Coimbatore, Zone Thanjavur, Nagapattinam, Thiruvarur, Cauvery Delta 4 Karur,Perambalur,Ariyalur and Adudurai zone Tiruchirapalli. Southern Virudhunagar, Tirunelveli and 5 Kovilpatti zone Toothugudi Pudukottai,Madurai,Dindigul, Theni, 6 South Zone Kannivadi Ramanathapuram and Sivagangai High rainfall 7 Kanyakumari Pechiparai zone 8 Hilly zone Nilgiris Ooty 9 Coastal Zone Karaikal and Pondicherry Karaikal Past Weather Summary for the period 23.06.17 to 26.06.17 for the State of Tamilnadu & Puducherry Temperature: Maximum Temperature of range 29oC – 40oC prevailed over the state. Kodaikanal and Uthagamandalam recorded Maximum temperature range 17oC – 22oC during the period. Minimum temperature of range 22oC - 30oC prevailed over the State. Kodaikanal and Uthagamandalam recorded Minimum temperature
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Location of Offices of Transport Department
    1. Location of Offices of Transport Department 1 2. ORGANISATION CHART OF THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT (HEAD QUARTERS SET UP) TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER / STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY Addl.Trpt.Commr., J.T.C. (Admin) J.T.C. (R) J.T.C.(R.S) D.T.C- Admin. D.T.C- I D.T.C- II C.A.O L.O A.S- I A.S- II A.S- III A.D.S A.O A.D.(IAW) S/S.T.A.T D.R.S.T.A.T 2 ORGANISATION CHART OF THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT Transport Commissioner JTC (North Zone) JTC (South Zone) RTOs- 10 AAO-1 RTOs- 12 AAO-1 UO - 2 UO - 2 Check Posts -4 Check Posts -0 Villupuram Zone Vellore Zone RTOs- 8 AAO-1 RTOs- 6 AAO-1 UO - 6 UO - 4 Check Posts -1 Check Posts -6 Salem Zone Erode Zone RTOs- 8 AAO-1 RTOs- 8 AAO-1 UO - 4 UO - 5 Check Posts -1 Check Post -1 JTC, Coimbatore zone Thanjavur Zone RTOs- 11 AAO-1 RTOs- 7 AAO-1 UO - 6 UO - 7 Check Posts -6 Check Post -0 Trichy Zone JTC, Madurai zone RTOs- 7 AAO-1 RTOs- 7 AAO-1 UO -8 UO - 9 Check Posts -0 Check Post -1 Virudhunagar Zone Tirunelveli zone RTOs- 6 AAO-1 RTOs-8 AAO-1 UO-3 UO -2 Check Post -2 JTC (Enforcement) -2 STA- Please see Previous page 3 3. OFFICES FUNCTIONING UNDER THE CONTROL OF TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT Number of Offices: 180 Zonal Offices :12, Enfo Offices:2, RTO Offices: 87, Unit Offices:58, Check Posts :21 Sl.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Nature Conservation Foundation Identification of critical crossing points of animals along the road in Project Title: and around Anamalai Tiger Reserve and to suggest relevant mitigation measures to minimize road mortality. Date of Report: Report Author and Contact Dr. Jeganathan. P Information CEPF Region: Western Ghats (Anamalai Corridor) Strategic Direction: CEPF Strategic Directions 1 - Enable action by diverse communities and partnerships to ensure conservation of key biodiversity areas and enhance connectivity in the corridors. Grant Amount: $ 17,532 Project Dates: April 2011 to June 2012 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): Tamil Nadu Forest Department (TNFD) TNFD gave us necessary permission to conduct this study in Anamalai Tiger Reserve and in Valparai plateau. They have also implemented certain recommendations based on this study results through Tamil Nadu Highways Department such as construction of speed breakers in the Anamalai Tiger Reserve (ATR). Tamil Nadu Highways Department (TNHD) TNHD was a stakeholder for targeted outreach and discussions on issues related to wildlife, and maintenance. They also implemented some of the recommendations based on this study results. Private Tea Plantation companies Private Plantation companies in Valparai Plateau gave us necessary permissions to install canopy bridges in the rainforest fragments which falls under their property. They also facilitate us to sensitize their workers on the impact of the roads on the wildlife in ATR and surrounding region. Conservation Impacts Please explain/describe how your project has contributed to the implementation of the CEPF ecosystem profile. This study contributed to the CEPF ecosystem profile mainly by two ways: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrinking Tree Cover and Increasing Tourist Arrivals Create an Existential Crisis for the Lion-Tailed Macaque and Other Denizens of the Forest in Valparai
    Shrinking tree cover and increasing tourist arrivals create an existential crisis for the lion-tailed macaque and other denizens of the forest in Valparai frontline.thehindu.com/environment/wild-life/photo-essay-shrinking-tree-cover-and-increasing-tourist-arrivals- create-an-existential-crisis-in-western-ghats-for-the-lion-tailed-macaque-and-other-denizens-of-the-forest-in-valparai- nilgiris-tamil-nadu/article33296849.ece The setting sun sends slanting shafts of smoky beams to stroke the tops of neatly cropped tea bushes, strobe-lighting the dance of the dust mites. The tea bushes on the rounded peak remind me of the stylised sculptures of the Buddha, his curly locks neatly arranged in concentric circles around the topknot. At this hour, the sun seems to be on the back foot in his daily duel with mist. The nocturnal chorus of the cicadas will soon begin when the sun loses the duel. The otherwise raucous birds of rainbow plumes have also fallen silent in anticipation. Then she emerges from the far side of the tea bushes, carefully picking her way through the paths that stitch the bushes into a patchwork quilt of deep green. In tow is her young one. A third, another younger female, stands on the edge of the forest, waiting for the matriarch to chart a safe course through the bushes. They are on their way to the forest on the other side for which they must cross the road that slices what must have once been a contiguous territory for them to roam at will. Now she has to defer to the encroachers, scanning both sides of the road for that speeding automobile that has maimed many of her tribe.
    [Show full text]