DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Scoping Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL SCOPING STATEMENT High Bridge Wind Project, Case 18-F-0262 Town of Guilford, Chenango County, New York Prepared For: High Bridge Wind, LLC 717 Texas Ave Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77002 Contact: Mr. Alec Jarvis, Director of Development Phone: (207) 956-1169 Prepared By: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 41 State Street, Suite 401 Albany, New York 12207 Contact: Gregory S. Liberman Phone: (518) 451-9510 July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND ARTICLE 10 PROCESS OUTLINE ............................................................................ 1 1.1. FACILITY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. FACILITY BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3. SUMMARY OF PRE-APPLICATION ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................... 6 1.4. POTENTIAL IMPACTS .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.5. IMPACT AVOIDANCE MEASURES ........................................................................................................ 10 1.6. ORGANIZATION OF THE FSS ................................................................................................................ 12 2.0 CONTENT OF APPLICATION ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2. OVERVIEW AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT............................................................................................. 14 2.3. LOCATION OF FACILITIES ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.4. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................................... 22 2.5. ELECTRIC SYSTEM EFFECTS .............................................................................................................. 29 2.6. WIND POWER FACILITIES ..................................................................................................................... 39 2.7. NATURAL GAS POWER FACILITIES ..................................................................................................... 42 2.8. ELECTRIC SYSTEM PRODUCTION MODELING .................................................................................. 42 2.9. ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 44 2.10. CONSISTENCY WITH ENERGY PLANNING OBJECTIVES .................................................................. 51 2.11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN DRAWINGS ..................................................................................................... 58 2.12. CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 63 2.13. REAL PROPERTY ................................................................................................................................... 66 2.14. COST OF FACILITIES ............................................................................................................................. 68 2.15. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ............................................................................................................. 69 2.16. POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES ...................................................................................................... 77 2.17. AIR EMISSIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 78 2.18. SAFETY AND SECURITY ....................................................................................................................... 80 2.19. NOISE AND VIBRATION ......................................................................................................................... 86 2.20. CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................... 101 2.21. GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY, AND SOILS .............................................................................................. 109 2.22. TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY AND WETLANDS ...................................................................................... 118 2.23. WATER RESOURCES AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY .............................................................................. 151 2.24. VISUAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................. 162 2.25. EFFECT ON TRANSPORTATION ......................................................................................................... 176 2.26. EFFECT ON COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................................................................ 182 2.27. SOCIOECONOMIC EFFECTS .............................................................................................................. 187 2.28. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ................................................................................................................ 194 2.29. SITE RESTORATION AND DECOMMISSIONING ................................................................................ 195 2.30. NUCLEAR FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................... 198 2.31. LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES ....................................................................................................... 198 Final Scoping Statement High Bridge Wind Project Page i Case 18-F-0262 2.32. STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS ..................................................................................................... 202 2.33. OTHER APPLICATIONS AND FILINGS ................................................................................................ 205 2.34. ELECTRIC INTERCONNECTION ......................................................................................................... 206 2.35. ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS ................................................................................................... 208 2.36. GAS INTERCONNECTION .................................................................................................................... 210 2.37. BACK-UP FUEL ..................................................................................................................................... 210 2.38. WATER INTERCONNECTION .............................................................................................................. 210 2.39. WASTEWATER INTERCONNECTION.................................................................................................. 210 2.40. TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCONNECTION ................................................................................. 211 2.41. APPLICATIONS TO MODIFY OR BUILD ADJACENT .......................................................................... 211 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 212 4.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 221 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Sources of Data Used to Prepare Mapping of Specially Designated Areas ............................................... 23 Table 2. Sources of Data Used to Prepare Mapping of Recreational and Sensitive Areas ...................................... 24 Table 3. Summary of High Bridge Wind Design Goals and Sound Standards ....................................................... 96 Table 4. Land Cover Classes Found within the Facility Site .................................................................................. 119 Table 5. Preliminary Disturbance Area Assumptions. ............................................................................................ 122 Table 6. Protected and Sensitive Areas within 10 Miles of the Facility Site. .......................................................... 131 Table 7. NYSDEC-Mapped Wetlands .................................................................................................................... 134 Table 8. Demographic Information for the Town of Guilford .................................................................................. 188 Table 9. List of All State Approvals for the Construction and Operation of the Facility that are Procedural in Nature and Whether supplanted by PSL Article 10. .......................................................................................... 203 Table 10. Federal Permits and Approvals for the Facility ....................................................................................... 206 Table 11. FSS Content Matrix ................................................................................................................................ 214 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Regional
Recommended publications
  • Theodore Burr and His Bridges Across the Susquehanna

    Theodore Burr and His Bridges Across the Susquehanna

    --- -A THEODORE BURR'S BRIDGE AT NESCOPEK FALLS After Matthew R. Stealey, i828 Courtesy Bureau of Land Records, Pennsylvania Department of Internal Affairs THEODORE BURR AND HIS BRIDGES ACROSS THE SUSQUEHANNA By HUBERTIS M. CUMMINGS* 5 7HEN he came to Northumberland in the late autumn of vv 1811 to arrange for his first bridge building on the Susque- hanna, Theodore Burr carried with him a clear and unmistakable eminence. Eleven years later, when in November, 1822, he died at Middletown, he left behind him along that same river an as- sured but rather divided fame. Within the interval, indeed within the first eight years of it, he had built five bridges across the Sus- quehanna, four in Pennsylvania and one in Maryland. From Port Deposit below the State Line to Northumberland, famous old "Point" at the meeting of the North Branch and the West Branch of Pennsylvania's great inland river, and upstream to Berwick, his *Dr. Hubertis M. Cummings, author of Richard Peters and other works, is well known to readers of PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY, especially for "Song of a River" (April, 1952), "Stephen Hills and the Building of Pennsylvania's First Capitol" (October, 1953), and "Pennsylvania, Network of Canal Ports" (July, 1954). He is at present engaged on a history of the Pennsylvania Canal. 476 THEODORE BURR AND HIS BRIDGES 477 work had been prodigious and his name mighty. For a hundred miles up and down the broad current past Rock Run, past Colum- bia, past Harrisburg, past Sunbury, men knew him well. He had done much to deserve renown before he came to the Susquehanna.
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types

    A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types

    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
  • 'Emmsylvamia Noler :Tober 1954 Lvania Fish Commission

    'Emmsylvamia Noler :Tober 1954 Lvania Fish Commission

    'EMMSYLVAMIA NOLER :TOBER 1954 LVANIA FISH COMMISSION wm&&.,. Looking north across Allegheny River valley at Kinzua into Cornplanterland. —photo by Don Conaway The Hills of Home -- PennsyLuania When my shade returns from Its chrysalis In the lyric stream that laves their feet; Of centuries to these loved hills Where wild azaleas, honey-sweet, And finds them not at all like this, Snatch away the breath and wits— But victim of winds and waters' wills— And break one's sophistry to bits. Leveled again to a humdrum plain, It shall fade with grief, though it grieve Yes, my grieving ghost shall fret and fade, in vain Missing the candled pine trees' shade; For the domes and cones and odd triangles The oak and maple, birch and spruce, Where gold deer graze and the wild grape And faintly crying, What's the use! dangles; Shall disappear for another eon Where dogwood hangs suspended in Till earth, grown satiate with sleep, May's air, translucent as the fin Turns once again, with a sigh so deep Of a polka-dotted trout that lies, It heaves up the lawned monotony With coral flesh and agate eyes, To lovely hill-geometry. Marion Doyle THE PENNSYLVANIA FISH COMMISSION Proudly joins Pennsylvania ns everywhere in observing PENNSYLVANIA WEEK OCTOBER 10-17 1954 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER PENNSYLVANIA HON. JOHN S. FINE GOVERNOR VOL 23, No. 10 OCTOBER, 1954 PENNSYLVANIA FISH COMMISSION PAUL F. BITTENBENDER, President WILKES-BARRE LOUIS S. WINNER, Vice-Pres. LOCK HAVEN BERNARD S. HORNE IN THIS ISSUE PITTSBURGH MILTON t. PEEK RADNOR SUSQUEHANNA BRIDGES .
  • A Knickerbocker Tour of New York State, 1822: "Our Travels, Statistical

    A Knickerbocker Tour of New York State, 1822: "Our Travels, Statistical

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Electronic Texts in American Studies Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1822 A Knickerbocker tour of New York State, 1822: "Our Travels, Statistical, Geographical, Mineorological, Geological, Historical, Political and Quizzical"; Written by Myself XYZ etc. Johnston Verplanck New York American Louis Leonard Tucker , editor The New York State Library Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/etas Part of the American Studies Commons Verplanck, Johnston and Tucker, Louis Leonard , editor, "A Knickerbocker tour of New York State, 1822: "Our Travels, Statistical, Geographical, Mineorological, Geological, Historical, Political and Quizzical"; Written by Myself XYZ etc." (1822). Electronic Texts in American Studies. 61. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/etas/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Texts in American Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. I iC 1\ N A D I I I 0 iI I' I ~ I A Knickerbocker tour of New York State, 1822 ~~Our Travels, Statistical, Geographical, Mineorological, Geological, Historical, Political and "Quizzical" Written by myself XYZ etc. Edited, with an Introduction and Notes, By LoUIS LEONARD TUCKER The University of the State of New York The State Education Department The New York State Library Albany 1968 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of the University (with years when terms expire) 1969 JOSEPH W. MCGOVERN, A.B., LL.B., L.H.D., LL.D., Chancellor · New York 1970 EVERETT J.
  • West Union Bridge NHL Nomination (Draft)

    West Union Bridge NHL Nomination (Draft)

    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 WEST UNION BRIDGE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: West Union Bridge Other Name/Site Number: World Guide #14-61-27; Parke County Covered Bridge #26 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Spanning Sugar Creek at bypassed section of Tow Path Road/CR525W Not for Publication: City/Town: West Union vicinity, Reserve Township Vicinity: X State: Indiana County: Parke Code: 061 Zip Code: 47862 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: __ Building(s): __ Public-Local: X District: __ Public-State: __ Site: __ Public-Federal: __ Structure: X Object: __ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing buildings buildings sites sites 1 structures structures objects objects 1 Total 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related MultipleDRAFT Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 WEST UNION BRIDGE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    I SHORT WALKS IN AND?; ABOUT HARRISBURG - An inquiry .whether Verbeke- town was ever formally annexed to the city of Harrisburg which has just come i to hand opens Verbeketown up . interesting and How It thoughts about Was Absorbed a section of the | j north central I ! section only a short walk from | j the State Capitol. What was | ' known as Verbeketown was lard i out by the late William K. Verbeke, mayor and city controller, in two transactions, the first being in j, 1857. Roughly speaking, it _ ex- tended from just above Cumber¬ land street to Reily. The exact lines are to found in the records ot the Daunhin County Courthouse. Ve "troet was the central hign..-. - it is to the projector • of this developmer ■ that the cityy| owes the width of Rat thorough-, fare. When laid out it was given the name of the man who planned it and ■ not a part of Harris¬ burg. It was, however, covered by the act of I860 annexing every¬ thing between Herr and Maclay ■ streets at the time Harrisburg be¬ came a city. There were a num¬ ber of other developments in that section. Bergner & Mumma, a firm coT sed of two of the sub¬ stantial citizens of Harrisburg, laid out some property in the vi¬ ‘ijj cinity of Sixth street and the ■ |“Town of Paxton” was in the up¬ per part of the present Fifth ward, as has been told. Another devel¬ opment in that section was by the Barnitz family and etill another, toward the river, by the Berners.
  • Comprehensive Plan

    Comprehensive Plan

    Chenango County Board of Supervisors Chairman, Lawrence N. Wilcox – Oxford John H. Lawrence – Afton David C. Law – Norwich (town) Dolores Nabinger – Bainbridge James J. McNeil – Norwich (city) Thomas P. Grace – Columbus Robert M. Jeffrey – Norwich (city) Marion L. Ireland – Coventry Evan T. Williams – Otselic Daniel S. Jack – German Dennis O. Brown – Pharsalia George G. Raymond, III – Greene Jeffrey B. Blanchard – Pitcher George J. Seneck – Guilford Grace A. Nucero-Alger – Plymouth Wayne C. Outwater – Lincklaen Peter C. Flanagan – Preston Arrington J. Canor – McDonough Charles A. Mastro – Sherburne Robert Starr – New Berlin Fred J. Heisler, Jr. – Smithville Robert E. Wansor – North Norwich Michael R. Khoury – Smyrna Former Supervisors In Office During Adoption Process George L. Westcott – Coventry Richard C. Schlag – German Jack T. Cook – Greene Jerry L Kreiner – Plymouth 2 | P a g e Chenango County Planning and Economic Development Committee David C. Law, Chairperson Dolores Nabinger Peter C. Flanagan Thomas P. Grace James J. McNeil Fred J. Heisler, Jr. Chenango County Department of Planning and Development Donna M. Jones, M.U.R.P. & M.L.Arch., County Planning Director Rena M. Doing, Planner Shane H. Butler, Planner Chenango County Planning and Development Board C. Paul Thomsen, Chair George J. Seneck, Supervisor Paul Romahn, Vice-Chair Thomas P. Grace, Supervisor Perry Owen, Secretary Alex Larsen Theodore Guinn, 239 Review Committee Chair Robert Davis Bruce O. Beadle, 239 Review Committee Vice-Chair Christopher Lyons Sally C. Chirlin Michael Flanagan Mission: To improve the quality of life of all residents of Chenango County in harmony with the rural character of its environs through a constancy of purpose.
  • Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report

    Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report

    HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES IN MARYLAND: 1631-1960: HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Prepared for: Maryland State Highway Administration Maryland State Department of Transportation 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: P.A.C. Spero & Company 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 412 Baltimore, Maryland 21204 and Louis Berger & Associates 1001 East Broad Street, Suite 220 Richmond, Virginia 23219 July 1995 Revised October 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 II. MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION THROUGH FOUR CENTURIES ...........................3 A. The Influence of opologyT and Geology .......................................................3 B. The Early Transportation Network, 1631-1800 ..............................................3 1. The Early and Continuing Importance of Waterways ............................6 2. Early Roadways, 1631-1700 .....................................................................7 3. Colonial and Early National Transportation, 1700-1800 ........................9 C. Maryland Transportation Transformed, 1800-1900 .....................................15 1. Turnpikes and Turnpike Bridges ...........................................................17 4. The National Road ..................................................................................20 5. Maryland Canals: C&O and C&D ...........................................................21 6. The B&O Railroad and Maryland’s Bridges ..........................................22
  • Covered Bridges NHL Context Study

    Covered Bridges NHL Context Study

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission ======================================================================================= A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ======================================================================================= COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY ======================================================================================= B. Associated Historic Contexts ======================================================================================= ======================================================================================= C. Form Prepared by ======================================================================================= name/title Lola Bennett, Historian organization Heritage Documentation Programs, National Park Service address 1201 I Street NW, 7th Floor city/town Washington state DC zip code 20005 ======================================================================================= D. Certification