Diets of Freely Grazing and Captive Reindeer During Summer and Winter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diets of Freely Grazing and Captive Reindeer During Summer and Winter Diets of freely grazing and captive reindeer during summer and winter Mauri Nieminen & Ulla Heiskari Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Reindeer Research, Koskikatu 33 A, SF-96100 Rovaniemi, Finland Summary: The chemical composition and nutritive value of different forage plants and commercial feeds of reindeer were studied by standard methods in the Finnish reindeer herding area during 1980-86. The nutritive values, particularly the protein and mineral contents, of ground lichens (Cladina spp.) and arbo• real lichens (Alectoria spp.) were very low compared to forest wiregrass (Deschampsia flexuosa), summer forage plants and commercial feeds. The crude protein and mineral content of reindeer summer food was very high. The energy content of lichens and commercial feeds was high and they are an important sour• ce of energy for reindeer in winter. Key words: reindeer, forage plants, lichens, commercial feeds, seasons. Rangifer,9(l): 17-34 Nieminen, M. & Heiskari, U. 1988. Vapaasti laiduntavien ja tarhaporojen ravinto kesa 11a ja talvella. Yhteenveto: Poron ravintokasvien ja kaupallisten rehujen kemiallista koostumusta ja ravintoarvoja tutkittiin vakiomenetelmin Suomen poronhoitoalueella vuosina 1980-86. Poronjakalien {Cladina spp.) ja luppojen {Alec• toria spp.) ravintoarvot ja valkuais- ja kivennaisainepitoisuudet olivat hyvin alhaiset verrattuna metsalauhaan {Deschampsia flexuosa), kesaravintokasveihin ja kaupallisiin rehuihin. Poronjakalien ja kaupallisten rehujen energiapitoisuus oli kuitenkin korkea ja niista poro saa nopeasti tarvitsemaansa energiaa talvella. Rangifer,9(l): 17-34 Nieminen, M. & Heiskari, U. 1989. Fritt betande och inhagnade renars matsedel under sommar och vinter i Finland. Sammandrag: Man har undersokt den kemiska sammansattningen och naringsvardet av olika foderplanter och kommerciella fodermedel under åren 1980-86. Naringsvardet, sarskilt innhållet av protein i renlavar {Cladina spp.) och tradlavar {Alectoria spp.) var mycket lågt sammanliknat med smyla {Deschampsia flexu• osa), sommarbetes-planter och kommerciella fodermedel. Råprotein och mineralinnehåll i renenes som- marbetes-foder var mycket hogt. Energiinnehållet av lavar och kommerciella fodermedel var ho gt och dessa år viktiga energikallor for renen i vintern. Rangifer,9(l): 17-34 Introduction Under natural conditions the diet of the semi- the most important, including 13 lichens, 36 domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus ta- grasses, 29 herbs, 14 woody species, 8 randus L.J is comprised of about 250 different mushrooms, 5 shrubs and 1 horsetail (Skunc- plants, but an additional 200 may be acceptab• ke 1958). In winter, the basic types of fodder le. A total of 106 species have been listed as are lichens and some wintergreen plants. Li- Rangifer,9 (1), 1989 17 chens are a food specific to the reindeer, and chemical composition of different important in many arctic areas lichens constitute nearly forage plants were determined by standard 2/3 of the entire vegetable mass consumed by methods (AOAC 1980). The feed values (feed the reindeer during the year. Reindeer prefer units, energy values, digestible crude protein, fruticose lichens of the genus Cladina. The digestible organic matter and digestible ener• most important wintergreen plants are forest gy values) were calculated according to Salo wiregrass (Deschampsia flexuosa), cottongrass et al. (1982). (Eriophorum spp.), horsetails (Equisetum spp.) Forage samples were collected from several and sedges (Carex spp.). Arboreal lichens different plants of each species. Grasses and (Alectoria and Bryoria sp.) are important in forbs were cut at ground level. Only current the central and southern parts of the reindeer annual growth was collected from the shrubs herding area in Finland. Reindeer eat mush• and live part from lichens. rooms towards the end of summer, the most important being Boletus sp. The snow-covered period is nutritionally Results the most critical part of the year, and during The dry matter (DM) (36-49 %), crude pro• recent winters many reindeer in Finland have tein and crude fat contents of Cladina lichens been given supplementary rations of dry hay, was very low. Slightly higher values, especial• grains, molasses and commercial feeds. The ly dry matter (84-89 %) and crude protein, objective of this study was to compare the were measured in arboreal lichens (Alectoria chemical composition and nutritive values of spp.) growing on pines and birches (Table 1). the most important forage plants and com• Low crude fibre contents were measured in mercial feeds of the reindeer. Cetraria nivalis and in Alectoria lichens. Sugar content was higher in ground than in arbore• Material and methods al lichens. The lowest sugar content was mea• The forage plants of reindeer were collected sured in Cetraria nivalis. N-free extract con• during 1980-86 from different sampling areas tent of Cladina lichens was rather high. in the reindeer herding area in Finland. The Slightly higher values were measured in Alec• sampling was done during June and July. The toria lichens (Table 1). Table 1. Crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, sugar and N-free extract contents (% DM) in different li• chens from the Finnish reindeer herding area. Tabell 1. Rdprotein, rdfett, vdxttrdd, socker och kvavefria extraktivåmnen (% av torrsubstansen) i olika lavarter inom Finlands renskotselomrdde. Species Crude Crude Crude Sugar N-free protein (%) fat (%) fibre (%) (%) extract (%) Cladina spp. 2.9-4.5 3.3-3.9 20.0-34.9 1.2-2.0 54.6-69.6 Cladina rangiferina 1.7-3.3 1.4 38.3 1.2 56.2 Cladina arbuscula 3.4 2.9 30.1 1.8 62.4 Cladina mitis 2.3-2.9 Cladina stellaris 2.6-3.0 3.3 39.8 1.7 52.7 Cetraria nivalis 2.6 2.9 6.4 0.4 84.8 Stereocaulon spp. 6.2-7.1 Parmelia spp. 7.0 Alectoria spp. on pine 5.8 2.0 8.1 0.8 82 on birch 6.3 2.6 7.6 0.5 83 18 Rangifer,9(l), 1989 The ash, Ca, Mg, P, Na, K, Cu and Zn con• tents in Cladina lichens were very low com• txlO pared to other food plants (Tables 2 and 4). ON Similar low values were measured in arboreal rsl o ON o o O sO S 6 ON \D lichens. Fe and Mn contents were higher in Cladina lichens than in Alectoria lichens. i\ The feed unit values of Cladina lichens J* 1 were on average 3.9 kg/feed unit (NKF) and m OO o OO ON 1.4 kg DM/feed unit. The digestible organic N S m ^t- 00 matter in lichens was 691 g/kg DM and the crude energy content on average 18.8 MJ/kg o bX) l\ DM. Slightly lower feed unit values were I measured in Alectoria lichens growing on pi• ON ON 00 O i\ Hi G rsl ON nes and birches (1.21 and 1.13 kg/feed unit, and 1.01 and 1.01 kg DM/feed unit, respecti• vely). The digestible crude protein (DCP) bfl ON content was virtually zero in Cladina lichens. I CNj ON cn 00 o Slightly higher values were measured in Alec• u a 00 m" m* toria lichens. The crude energy content in Alectoria lichens growing on pines and bir• ches were on average 19.2 and 20.1 MJ/kg ^-001^ o ctf H <N t-H DM. o o OOOO The crude protein content of reindeer sum• mer forage plants varied slightly in different sampling areas and was 7.1-16.3 % DM in D. m b£ I flexuosa, 8.5-18.2 % in Equisetum fluviatile, s0 00 00 9.3-21.7 % DM in E. sylvaticum, 8.9-14.7 % DM in Carex spp., 10.6-16.2 % DM in Epilo- bium angustifolium, 9.4-15.2 % DM in Meny- bJD o anthes trifoliata, 10.3-25.5 % DM in Potentilla rn in rsl so m palustris, 11.3-23.0 % DM in leaves of Betula S^b 0 o o o O o o pubescens, 10.1-14.7 % DM in B. nana, 15.2¬ 19.3 % DM in B. tortuosa, 9.3-20.2 % DM in Salix phylicifolia and 6.6-14.9 % DM in S. lap- oJO o rn ON \0 ON ponum (Table 3). PL, ^Sb o o o o o O The digestible crude protein values were high in reindeer forage plants during summer and values varied between 50 and 200 g/feed I o i\ unit. The highest values were measured in Po• U^b tentilla palustris, B. pubescens, Equisetum spp. and S. phylicifolia (Table 3). The crude fibre OO content varied between 3.1-41.2 % DM in in different plants. The crude fat content varied CsJ ON between 0.7-15.5 % DM. The highest crude <N O fat values were measured in E. angustifolium and M. trifoliata. The content of N-free ex• tract varied between different plants (range bO S Ou, 43.6-71% DM). The sugar content varied be• a, a, tween 0.1-24.4 % DM, and the highest values OH 2 c/5 were measured in D. flexuosa, S. lapponum, B. © .5 .5=! nana, Carex spp. and Equisetum spp. during a, ^ a a 00 0 a Q o o summer. The feed unit values of different plants var- Rangifer,9(l), 1989 rt ON ON m ON ON oo oo oo i\ sO ON l\ 00 ON T-H rsi 1 CN 1 o 1 1 1 1 1 i l\ l\ ON OO r-H rsi I\ ON o ÖJD Jl G l\ o T-H ON rso j O o ON ON °. o ON T-H T-H ö T-H CN o T-H T-H T-H ö ö oo oo m sD m o o m <N sO sp o rsj rsj l\ m o m T-H od i< od r< T-H T-H 1 I 1 1 1 I OO sD O ON l\ 1 ^J- T-H sD I rsj m m sD T—m1 Ln r\ l\ ON rsj ON sd m m" m' rsi rsi rsi rsi m' m oo m oo sO rsj m OO TT ON rsi sd rsi m 5-! o Ö m' m' m rsi rsi rsi T-H T-H T-H T-H CS • 1 rsj rsi I 1 1 1 1 i oo xt- oo ô <N rii LH sO rsj osdo sd sd r\ od m K <N T-; oo o sO rsj m rt- in T-H sp T-H rsi ON ON m' sd m' od m l\ i\i sO sD sD sD sD s£> 1 1 1 sD i ON m o m ON OO vi o O in 00 <js ^-" osdo m ON m' T-H K rt-' in o m' LH m m m ^ in o o o m rsj rsi in in o in cg rsi ON T-H T-H T-H •™1 m' ON od I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i sD oo oo o rsj ON rsj l\ ON rsj in o T-Î T-H rsi m" Ö rsi T-H T-H m' in" m' in rsi l\ o o m ^t- oo m oo o K od rsi rsj vd rsi rsi rsj rsmi" rsmi" 1 rsi rsinj rsi 1 sD ON 1 1 T-H 1 1 1 i\ r\ T-H ON rsj SD m ON oo ON rsj T-H o T-H l\ od od rsi od T-H ON T-H od m' T-H T-H T-H o oo rsi m T-H o o sD y <L> (p Qj ON m m rsj o o T-H ON
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2009 Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America Chad Eric Husby Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10022522 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Husby, Chad Eric, "Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 200. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/200 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS OF EQUISETUM GIGANTEUM IN SOUTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Chad Eric Husby 2009 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Chad Eric Husby, and entitled Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett _______________________________________ Jack B. Fisher _______________________________________ David W. Lee _______________________________________ Leonel Da Silveira Lobo O'Reilly Sternberg _______________________________________ Steven F. Oberbauer, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2009 The dissertation of Chad Eric Husby is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant List, Pdf Format
    Appendix A: City of Bellingham Native Plant List December 2020 The City of Bellingham Native Plant List (Figure 1) includes plant species that are native to Bellingham watersheds (Figure 2). The native plant list applies to all habitat types, including riparian, upland, and wetland areas. The list was developed using specimen records from the Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria and Bellingham plant checklists curated by Don Knoke, a volunteer at the University of Washington Herbarium. To improve plant establishment and protect the genetic resources of our local plant populations, the City recommends using native plants that were grown from seeds or cuttings collected from the Puget Trough Ecoregion (Figure 3). Obtaining native plants grown from material collected from the Puget Trough Ecoregion will help ensure the plants are adapted to the unique environmental conditions of Bellingham watersheds and are genetically similar to our local plant populations. A more thorough discussion of the rational and selection process is provided in the City of Bellingham Public Works Department Native Plant Materials Selection Guidelines, December 2020. Figure 1. City of Bellingham Native Plant List Ferns Common Name Scientific Name Family Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Dennstaedtiaceae Bristle-like quillwort Isoetes tenella Isoetaceae Common horsetail Equisetum arvense Equisetaceae Deer fern Struthiopteris spicant (Blechnum spicant) Blechnaceae Dream fern Aspidotis densa Pteridaceae Giant horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii
    [Show full text]
  • M., 2019 Floristic Study of a Protected Wetland from Borsaros-Sancraieni, Harghita County, Romania
    Floristic study of a protected wetland from Borsaros-Sancraieni, Harghita County, Romania 1Emilian Pricop, 2Paul N. Filip, 3Bogdan-Mihai Negrea 1 Natural Sciences Museum of Piatra Neamţ - Neamţ County Museum Complex, Piatra Neamţ, Neamţ, Romania; 2 Faculty of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Iaşi, Romania; 3 ”Danube Delta” National Institute for Research and Development, Department of Ecological Restoration and Species Recovery, Tulcea, Romania. Corresponding author: E. Pricop, [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we intend to present a brief floristic survey and the old literature data over an interesting area in the Harghita County, Romania, Borsaros-Sancraieni swamp reserve, area protected since the beginning of 1939. Important personal scientific observations are highlighted. This paper was written specially to reveal the diversity of vascular flora from this area and the surroundings, and the risks which treat this bog. We confirm the presence of main characteristic species of this swamp type and complete the vascular flora species list. This area was mentioned as an important refuge of some rare glacial relict plant species of main conservation importance as: Betula humilis Schrank, Drosera anglica Hudson, Ligularia sibirica L. and Saxifraga hirculus L. Also, we would like to signal a significant change of the initial habitat, for which the area was designated a protected area, due in particular to the anthropic activity but also the lack of involvement in the conservation of nature at local and regional level. Key Words: vascular flora, swamp reserve, Betula humilis Schrank, Drosera anglica Hudson, Ligularia sibirica L., Saxifraga hirculus L., species list, habitat loss, adventive species.
    [Show full text]
  • Equisetum Fluviatile a New Adventive Species in New Zealand
    Two natives it might not be extravagant to claim as rheophytes are Podocarpus totara and P. acutifolius; they have limber firm leaved saplings and a marked ability to develop new roots from the lower trunk after burial by sand and gravel. Perhaps other flood plain trees such as the lacebarks owe their similar juvenile form (i.e. flexuose not divaricating) to river shaping as much as to the moa. ..Finally we must consider the Waitakere Range most abundant rheophyte even though it is adventive mist flower (Eupatorium riparium). This is coming to dominate all our northern stream beds but does equally well on clay road cuttings or at the foot of slopes in woodland e.g. Auckland Domain. Van Steenis suggests that in its home of Mexico or West Indies it might be a kremnophyte that is a plant of steep banks such as river terrace scarps or landslide scars. He notes that it was deliberately introduced to highland Java for the purpose of stabilizing earth walls in tea and cinchona plantations! Mist flower has the typical rheophytic leaf shape and can make strong growth of adventitious roots. It would seem to disperse a short way by wind and over longer distances through virtue of the barbellate nature of the achene and pappus. Though mist flower is of interest as one of the relatively few rheophytes in the Compositae we can hope that it will not be too long before some insect or parasite arrives (or that we adopt the Javanese practice of composting the species) giving our native rheophytes a chance of having their Story told in greater depth than has been attempted here.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Plants Survey Form
    WETLAND PLANTS PondNet RECORDING FORM (PAGE 1 of 5) Your Name Date Pond name (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 e.g. SP 1235 4325 Determiner name (optional) Voucher material (optional) METHOD (complete one survey form per pond) Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value, by recording wetland plants. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from wetland vegetation like rushes at the pond’s outer edge, or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. Enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ or send your results to Freshwater Habitats Trust. Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Stonewort, Bearded (Chara canescens) Floating-leaved species Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) Stonewort, Bristly (Chara hispida) Bistort, Amphibious (Persicaria amphibia) Arrowhead, Canadian (Sagittaria rigida) Stonewort, Clustered (Tolypella glomerata) Crystalwort, Channelled (Riccia canaliculata) Arrowhead, Narrow-leaved (Sagittaria subulata) Stonewort, Common (Chara vulgaris) Crystalwort, Lizard (Riccia bifurca) Awlwort (Subularia aquatica) Stonewort, Convergent (Chara connivens) Duckweed, non-native sp.
    [Show full text]
  • European Lycopods and Ferns
    European Red List of Lycopods and Ferns Mariana García Criado, Henry Väre, Ana Nieto, Rui Bento Elias, Robert Dyer, Yury Ivanenko, Daniella Ivanova, Richard Lansdown, José Antonio Molina, Germinal Rouhan, Fred Rumsey, Angelo Troia, Jan Vrba and Maarten J. M. Christenhusz European Red List of Lycopods and Ferns Mariana García Criado, Henry Väre, Ana Nieto, Rui Bento Elias, Robert Dyer, Yury Ivanenko, Daniella Ivanova, Richard Lansdown, José Antonio Molina, Germinal Rouhan, Fred Rumsey, Angelo Troia, Jan Vrba and Maarten J. M. Christenhusz The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) as a deliverable of the LIFE European Red Lists project (LIFE14 PRE/BE/000001). Project Title: Establishing a European Red List of Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, Saproxylic Beetles, Terrestrial Molluscs and Vascular Plants (LIFE European Red Lists; LIFE14 PRE/BE/000001). Project duration: May 2015 to December 2018. Project’s total costs: 1,166,667 EUR. Contribution of the LIFE Programme: 700,000 EUR. The LIFE Programme (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/index.htm) is the EU’s financial instrument supporting environmental, nature conservation and climate action projects throughout the EU. The general objective of LIFE is to contribute to the implementation, updating and development of EU environmental, nature conservation and climate policy and legislation by co- financing projects with European added value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Associations of Epiphytic Macroinvertebrates and Aquatic Macrophytes in Canyon Lake, WA
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Summer 2018 The Associations of Epiphytic Macroinvertebrates and Aquatic Macrophytes in Canyon Lake, WA Jesse T. (Jesse Tyler) Klinger Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Klinger, Jesse T. (Jesse Tyler), "The Associations of Epiphytic Macroinvertebrates and Aquatic Macrophytes in Canyon Lake, WA" (2018). WWU Graduate School Collection. 729. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/729 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Associations of Epiphytic Macroinvertebrates and Aquatic Macrophytes in Canyon Lake, WA By Jesse Tyler Klinger Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Gautam Pillay, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair, Dr. Robin A. Matthews Dr. Leo R. Bodensteiner Dr. James M. Helfield MASTER'S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii APPLIED RANGE ECOLOGY of REINDEER (Rangifer Tarandus Tarandus) on the SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA a THESIS Presented to The
    ii APPLIED RANGE ECOLOGY OF REINDEER (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) ON THE SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Gregory L. Finstad, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2008 iii ABSTRACT Linking variation of the environment to animal production is key to successful range management. Ecological site descriptions (ESDs) are landscape units used by land managers for the grazing management of domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. This study investigated the appropriateness of using ESDs for the grazing management of reindeer and explored the use of alternate units to link landscape variation to animal production. ESD composition of reindeer ranges varied across the Seward Peninsula, but there was no relationship to either animal production, estimated by June calf weight and cow/calf ratios, or reindeer serum and tissue mineral concentrations. I have shown that reindeer do not graze uniformly across ESDs, but are selective, both temporally and spatially, in what they consume. Reindeer diet selection and animal production appear to be driven by temporal variation in the nutritional characteristics of individual forage species. Biomass production and seasonal nutritional characteristics of forage species were used develop a computerized mapping program for reindeer producers to identify high quality grazing areas. Production among herds was related with identified forage sources of protein in the diet. Reindeer in herds with smaller June calves consumed more catkins, stems and leaf buds of shrubs in May, presumably to compensate for lower protein reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Stormwater Design Manual
    Daniel Shaw Rusty Schmidt PLANTS FOR STORMWATER DESIGN Species Selection for the Upper Midwest Daniel Shaw & Rusty Schmidt Authors Sam Brungardt Editor Richard Harrison Designer July 2003 To obtain a free copy of this guidebook, telephone (651) 297-8679 or write to Operations and Environmental Review Section, Regional Environmental Management Division, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Rd. N., Saint Paul, MN 55103-1402. This publication can be made available in other formats, including Braille, large type, computer disk or audiotape, upon request. FUNDING Funding for this guidebook was provided through a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This guidebook is the result of the hard work of many individuals. First, we would like to thank Mark Gernes at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for administering the grant for this project and providing technical guidance. Rich Harrison played a significant role in the project, tirelessly conducting layout and graphic design. Among other MPCA staff, we are grateful to Sam Brungardt for taking on the daunting task of editing this complex document, to Carol Pruchnofski for the great job she did designing the cover, to Kathy Carlson, who led us through the printing process, and to Louis Flynn, who provided technical guidance. We also thank Jackie Newman for developing the range graphic for the book and Aaron Mikonowicz for assisting with the development of flood tolerance graphics. Many professionals throughout the region played a significant role reviewing the plant charts and the final draft. Among these are Steven Apfelbaum, Kevin Bilgalke, Mary Blickendorfer, Julia Bohnen, Susan Borman, Mike Evenocheck, Diane Hellekson, Jason Husveth, Bob Jacobson, Beth Kunkel, John Larson, Mary Meyer, Byron Shaw and Leslie Yetka.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabrook Native Plant List
    SEABROOK NATIVE PLANT LIST The plant identification guide used for this list is: Oemleria cerasiformis* Indian-Plum PLANTS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST COAST by: Jim Oplopanax horridus Devil’s Club Pojar and Andy MacKinnon. Philadelphus lewisii* Mock Orange Physocarpus capitatus* Pacific Nine Bark Those plants listed in Bold have been identified in Seabrook. Ribes sanguineu* Red Flowering Currant Others may occur within Seabrook or would likely find the climate Rhododendron occidentale* Western Azalea suitable for their survival and health. Rhododendron macrophyllum Pacific Rhododendron Rosa gymnocarpa* Baldhip Rose PLANTS WITH AN “*” ARE LIKELY TO BE FOUND Rosa nutkana* Nootka rose WITHIN REPUTABLE NATIVE PLANT NURSERIES. Rosa pisocarpa * Cluster Rose Rosa woodsii* Wood’s Rose Trees: Rubus parviflorus* Thimbleberry Rubus spectabilis* Salmonberry Abies grandis* Grand Fir Sorbus sitchensis Sitka Mountain Ash Acer circinatum* Vine Maple Spirea douglasii* Douglas Spirea Acer macrophyllum* Bigleaf Maple Symphoricarpus albus* Common Snowberry Alnus rubra* Red Alder Symphoricarps smollis Creeping Snowberry Arbutus menziesii Pacific Madrone Vaccinium alaskaense Alaskan Blueberry Betula pspyrrferg* White Birch Vaccinium ovalifolium Oval-Leaved Blueberry Chemeocyparis nootkatnesis* Alaska Cedar Vaccinium ovatum* Evergreen Huckleberry Cornus nuttallii Pacific Dogwood Vaccinium parvifolium Red Huckleberry Crataegus douglasii Black Hawthorn Fraxinus latifolia Sitka Ash Malus fusca* Pacific Crab Apple Ground Covers: Picea sitchensis* Sitka Spruce Pinus contorta* Shore pine Asarium caudatum* Wild Ginger Populus trichocarpa Black Cottonwood Cornus Canadensis* Bunchberry Prunus emarginatai Bitter Cherry Empetrum nigrum Crowberry Pseudotsuga menziesii* Douglas Fir Fragaria chiloensis* Beach Strawberry Rhamnus purshiana Cascara Fragaria vesca Wood’s Stawberry Salix fluvialilis Columbia River Willow Fragaria virginiana* Wild Strawberry Salix geyeriana Geyer’s Willow Linnaea borealis Twinflower Salix hookeriana*.
    [Show full text]
  • Equisetaceae Key & Charts
    Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Key Key to species in Newfoundland and Labrador © Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador (2019) 1a. Main stem branched twice, with smaller secondary branches originating from each node of the primary branches; leaves united into a loose chestnut brown sheaths at each node, divided at the tip into 3 or 4 pointed teeth. ..... Equisetum sylvaticum (woodland horsetail) 1b. Main stem of photosynthetic shoots unbranched or branched once; leaf sheaths at each node ending in distinct teeth or with 2 teeth joined together. ........................................... 2 2a. Stems branched, with strobili borne at the tip of photosynthetic or non- photosynthetic stems. ................................................................................................. 3 2b. Stems unbranched, with strobili borne at the tip of photosynthetic stems. ............. 7 3a. Shoots dimorphic, with separate sterile and fertile shoots. ................................................. 4 3b. Shoots monomorphic, with strobili borne at the tip of photosynthetic stems. ................... 5 4a. Fertile shoots pinkish-brown or flesh-coloured, emerging before sterile shoots, withering after spores are shed; leaf sheaths about as long as wide, with 15–20 dark brown to black teeth, often with 2 teeth joined together. .......................................... ............................................................................... Equisetum arvense (field horsetail) 4b. Fertile shoots uncommon, becoming green and branched after spores
    [Show full text]