Green Infrastructure in the Liverpool City Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Infrastructure in the Liverpool City Region Green PETER MORTON Infrastructure DIRECTOR MERSEY WATERFRONT REGIONAL PARK in the Liverpool City Region THE MERSEY PARTNERSHIP Economic Growth & Investment Recreation & Leisure Land & Property Values Quality of Place Labour Productivity GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Land & GREEN INTERVENTIONS Biodiversity INFRASTRUCTURE Tourism INTERVENTIONS Flood Products alleviation & from the Management Land Climate Change Health & Adaption & Wellbeing Mitigation Businesses attract and retain more Economic motivated staff in greener settings Growth & Footpaths, cycle paths and Investment Recreation bridleways enable healthy, low cost & Leisure recreation Views of natural landscapes can Land & Add up to 18% to property values Property Values Quality of Community-owned green spaces can Place create jobs for local people Green spaces near workplaces reduce sickness absence increasing Labour Productivity productivity GREEN Green Infrastructure provides vital INFRASTRUCTURE Land & INTERVENTIONS Biodiversity habitats and jobs managing land Rural Tourism supports 37,500 jobs in the Northwest Tourism Flood Urban green spaces reduce pressure Products alleviation & on drainage and flood defences 40,000 people work in agricultures in from the Management the Northwest Land Climate Green Infrastructure can counter Green Infrastructure reduces pollution Change soaring summer temperatures in Health & Adaption & Which leads to asthma and heart Mitigation cities disease Wellbeing History Is green space a strategic issue? “After 1848 the cities tended to acquire [fountains, squares, promenades, trees and churches] but in the first generations of industrialization they had very little of it, unless by chance they had inherited traditions of gracious public building or open spaces” Ian Wray (Eric Hobsbawm) Head of Planning, Transport and Housing Northwest Regional Development Agency An old tradition? 5th December 2008 Civilisation Why green space matters in the 21st century city a) the economic/amenity case: “The measure of any great civilisation is to be found in its cities, The UKs post industrial economy and a measure of a city’s greatness is to be found in the quality of its public spaces, its parks, and its squares” (Ruskin) The rise of India and China From making goods, to attracting and keeping people: - As tourists and visitors Did the 19th or even 20th century city need environmental quality to succeed? - As students - As talented workers - As parents Why green space matters in the 21st century city Knowledge based business b) the sustainable development case: Means one thing – brainpower, Successful, talented, educated, discriminating people we must use our legs more and our cars less or we will all get sick, as will the planet In increasing demand (and a greener city will mitigate rising temperatures) But falling in supply (demographics and retirement) What the US gurus say… What the US gurus say… “The demand for creative workers will continue to grow because they are the masters of innovation…competition is fuelling even A Wall Street Journal survey of 4000 recent college graduates greater demand for their services…these jobs are likely to pay found that three quarters thought location was more important increasingly well” (Robert Reich - once Bill Clinton’s Labour than availability of a job in selecting a place to live Secretary) “Cities have become the prime location for the creative lifestyle and the amenities that go with it…and re emerged as centres of creativity and incubators of innovation…” (Richard Florida) Exploring the environmental science case… Key issues for the built environment Green space benefits • evaporative cooling • coastal and river related flooding • rainwater interception • subsidence, wind and storm damage • infiltration and ‘soakaway’ • warm summers and human comfort Cities have reduced green space Climate change strengthens the urban heat island effect and all these have economic consequences increases surface run off issue (Adapted from Strategies for Climate Change in the Urban Environment – Handley and Carter, 2006) (Adapted from Strategies for Climate Change in the Urban Environment – Handley and Carter, 2006) Human comfort Rising demand for green space • high emission scenarios up to 2080 showed city centre • enjoying warm conditions population exposed to high temperatures • over a longer season and into the evening • medium high scenario shows number of hot days at Manchester Airport rises from 5 days to 45 days • need to access open air, wind and shade • what happens when people get too hot? • need to access cool external environments from uncomfortable warm residential properties in evening or at night • social implications? • adaptive behaviour • economic implications? • positive feedback via air con Greater Manchester: maximum surface temperature Greater Manchester: evapotranspiring surface Maximum surface temperature in high density residential with plus or minus 10% green cover “adding 10% green cover keeps maximum surface temperatures in high density residential and town centres at or below the 1961 – 1990 current case up until 2080 high” The Fifth Critical Infrastructure • Infrastructure – the basic physical and organisational structures needed for the operation of society or enterprise (Oxford English Dictionary). Green Infrastructure and Natural England • The 4 Critical Infrastructures; Pam Warhurst, Board Member, Natural England. • Transport. • Water. • Power. • Waste. • The 5th Critical is Green! Green Infrastructure for Sustainable Green Infrastructure for the Natural Economy. Communities. • Green Infrastructure is critical for • Green Infrastructure is critical for the creation and maintenance of the creation and maintenance of Sustainable Communities. Natural Economies. • Healthy exercise – helping to • Helps reduce illness and stress reduce heart disease, obesity levels leading to fewer lost days. levels etc. • Helps manage environmental • Recreation – reducing stress, hazards cutting risks and clean up enabling children’s play – adults costs. need to play too! • Helps improve image, • Healthier living environments – investment, bring in and retain improving air quality, reducing skills and businesses and so noise pollution, creating attractive supporting competitiveness. places to live. • Supports growth and • Contact with nature – how regeneration – but it isn’t free important is that? Just ask and it doesn’t just happen – it anyone who enjoys Springwatch! takes good long term planning, strategic investment and a commitment to ongoing • The green stuff is at the heart of improvement. providing a good Quality of Life. Green Infrastructure for robust Ecosystem Services. Activity in the NW • Green Infrastructure is critical for • What’s been going on? robust Ecosystem Services. • Ecological networks that support • Talking – discussion and biodiversity. communication. • Spatial planning- local to • Cities and towns that are adapting to regional. climate change – increased storminess, intense rainfall events, • The Economy – Natural health threatening temperatures and Economy NW – the role of GI heat island effects. in economic development, growth and regeneration. • To support move to low carbon economy. • Climate Change – the role of GI in coping with change. • Need to understand relationships • Growth Points – Housing between the environment and our Growth and the challenge of social and economic activities. developing more sustainable communities. • Mitigate for any damaging impacts. Maximise opportunities. The need for partnership. The need for planning. • A more systems based approach to planning this infrastructure. • Broad agenda. • A variety of scales. • A sub-regional framework to • Can deliver for a variety of stakeholders. give the bigger picture. • Needs to be integrated • More focussed work in districts. approach. • Joined up working. • Area focussed work to address specific needs and opportunities. The economic driver. Adapting to change. • Our climate is changing. • Seek to maximise the 11 key • Need to climate proof our benefits. cities and towns. • Ensure GI plays a role in delivering City Region • GI has a role in mitigation but a bigger one in adaptation. aspirations. • The need for sustainable • Anticipate and plan to cope growth and regeneration. with probable increased storminess, rain storms and heat events. • Robust city centres and protected vulnerable communities. Growth Points. The task ahead. • Two Growth Points in Merseyside. • Join up the thinking. • GI a condition of approval. • Build capacity of existing structures and organisations – • Need to develop more sustainable communities. avoid reinventing wheels. • Applies to all communities. • Develop a jointly agreed approach which will set a common • Engagement of people in planning, delivering and agenda and system of priorities. maintaining a better quality of live. • Remember that the final product goes beyond policies and • Underpin the Merseyside offer as a place to live. strategies – it is important to people in their everyday lives. Planned, delivered and maintained like other Natural England want to help. forms of infrastructure. • Good progress on the GI agenda being made across the NW. • Today will help to continue that in Merseyside. • Not starting from scratch – a lot of good work already done. • But the challenges for the environment, the economy and the community remain. • Need to up our game and raise our sights. The Economic Benefits of The Economic Benefits of GREEN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE NERYS
Recommended publications
  • St.Helens Local Plan Core Strategy Adopted by St.Helens Council on 31St October 2012
    LDF43E LocalSt.Helens Development Local Plan Framework CCoreore StrategyStrategy PublicationOctober 2012 Version – May 2009 St.Helens Local Plan Core Strategy Adopted by St.Helens Council on 31st October 2012. St.Helens Local Plan Core Strategy Foreword Foreword from St.Helens Local Strategic Partnership and the Cabinet Member for iii Urban Regeneration, Housing and Culture How to Use this Document v Introduction 1 Introduction 2 St.Helens Now 2 Context 14 3 Issues, Problems and Challenges 22 St.Helens in 2027 4 St.Helens in 2027 28 Regenerating St.Helens 5 The Key Diagram 36 6 Overall Spatial Strategy 38 7 St.Helens Core Area 48 8 St.Helens Central Spatial Area 54 9 Newton-le-Willows and Earlestown 62 10 Haydock and Blackbrook 78 11 Rural St.Helens 84 Achieving the Vision 12 Ensuring Quality Development in St.Helens 90 13 Creating an Accessible St.Helens 96 14 Providing Quality Housing in St.Helens 104 15 Ensuring a Strong and Sustainable St.Helens Economy 118 16 Safeguarding and Enhancing Quality of Life in St.Helens 126 17 Minerals and Waste 140 Appendices 1 Appendix 1: Delivery and Monitoring Strategy 146 2 Appendix 2: Bibliography 170 3 Appendix 3: Glossary of Terms 178 4 Appendix 4: Saved UDP policies to be replaced by the Core Strategy 192 St.Helens Local Development Framework St.Helens Local Plan Core Strategy Policies Policy CSS 1 Overall Spatial Strategy 38 Policy CIN 1 Meeting St.Helens' Infrastructure Needs 43 Policy CSD 1 National Planning Policy Framework - Presumption in Favour 44 of Sustainable Development Policy CAS 1
    [Show full text]
  • St. Helens Borough Council Retail and Leisure Study Final Report May 2017
    St. Helens Borough Council Retail and Leisure Study Final Report May 2017 (Publication date January 2018 to Incorporate the Latest Experian Data) Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Current and Emerging Retail Trends ................................................................................................ 5 3.0 Planning Policy Context .................................................................................................................. 14 4.0 Original Market Research ................................................................................................................ 24 5.0 Health Check Assessments.............................................................................................................. 54 6.0 Population and Expenditure ............................................................................................................ 70 7.0 Retail Capacity in St. Helens Authority Area ..................................................................................... 78 8.0 Commercial Leisure ........................................................................................................................ 89 9.0 Key Findings and Recommendations................................................................................................ 102 Glossary of Terms ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prescot Churchwardens' Accounts 1635-1663
    The Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire Volume 137: start THE RECORD SOCIETY OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE FOUNDED TO TRANSCRIBE AND PUBLISH ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE TWO COUNTIES VOLUME CXXXVII The Society wishes to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance given towards the cost of publication by The Marc Fitch Fund King’s College, Cambridge The Right Honourable The Earl of Derby The Society also wishes to acknowledge with gratitude the technical assistance given by Paul Laxton and Suzanne Yee of the Department of Geography, University of Liverpool. © Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire Thomas Steel ISBN 0 902593 48 X Produced by The Charlesworth Group, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK PRESCOT CHURCHWARDENS’ ACCOUNTS, 1635-1663 E dited by Thomas Steel PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY 2002 FOR THE SUBSCRIPTION YEARS 1998 and 1999 COUNCIL AND OFFICERS FOR THE YEARS 1998 AND 1999 President Jenny Kermode, B.A., Ph.D. Hon. Council Secretary Dorothy J. Clayton, M.A., Ph.D., A.L.A., c/o John Rylands University Library of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PP Hon. Membership Secretary Maureen Barber, B.A., D.L.A., 7 Rosebank, Lostock, Bolton, BL6 4PE Hon. Treasurer and Publications Secretaiy (from Sept 2000) Fiona Pogson, B.A., Ph.D., c/o Department of History, Liverpool Hope University College, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD Hon. General Editor Philip Morgan, B.A., Ph.D., F.R.H.S., Department of History, University of Keele, Keele, ST5 5BG Other Members of the Council B. Jackson, M.A., D.A.A. V. McKernan, B.A., D.A.A. P.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Map for Merseyside
    90 300000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 400000 BGS maps covering Liverpool, Knowsley, Sefton, St. Helens and Wirral 450 2 74 Inactive or unproductive Deep coal at more than 1200 m coalfield Petroleum Exploration and Shallow coal with less than PEDL Development Licence issued 50 m overburden under the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934 (as at Nov. 2005) Deep coal between 50 m MERSEYSIDE FORMBY G13 and 1200 m Hydrocarbon well (comprising City of Liverpool, Boroughs of 83 30 84 30 Knowsley, Sefton, St. Helens and Wirral) FORMBY 5 FRESHFIELD G2 Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, FRESHFIELD G1 FORMBY G38 FORMBY 6 FORMBY G37 FORMBY G46 Regional and Local Planning FORMBY G102 FORMBY 4 Mineral Resources FORMBY G59 FORMBY G101/101A Scale 1:100 000 SEFTON FLEA MOSS G2 PEDL134 FLEA MOSS G1 FORMBY G22 MUSTANG LITTLE CROSBY ST. HELENS 400 EXL273 PEDL101 GREENPARK 96 97 MUSTANG KNOWSLEY CROXTETH 2 2 2 3 LIVERPOOL Ribble Estuary CROXTETH 1 Foreshore (SiS) (Southport Shore) (SiS) EXL253 WIRRAL EASTERN/PEG EXL273 20 GREENPARK 20 PEDL116 STRATAGAS PEDL145 ISLAND GAS 425 450 EXL276 PEDL038 BIOGAS Production of this map was commissioned and funded by the Office of the ALKANE Deputy Prime Minister (Contract MP0677). PEDL038 ALKANE 1:63 360 or 1:50 000 map published Current digital availability of these sheets can be found on the British Geological Survey website: www.bgs.ac.uk SAND & GRAVEL 450 Superficial deposits Sub-alluvial: Inferred resources Glaciofluvial deposits PEAT 400 400 10 10 BRICK CLAY Carboniferous Brick clay and Fireclay coincident
    [Show full text]
  • Colliery Scrap Book 2
    COLLIERY SCRAP BOOK 2 ACCIDENTS AND INCIENTS IN ST. HELENS COLLIERIES COLLINS GREEN, CRONTON, CROP & DEEP, CROPPERS HILL, ECCLESTON HALL, FRODSHAM , GLADE HILL, GERRARDS BRIDGE, GILLERS GREEN, GIN LANE, GREEN LANE, GREENGATE, HALSNEAD, HARDSHAW, HOLLIN HEY, LAFFACK, LAFFACK-GARSWOOD LEA GREEN, MILL LANE, MOSS HOUSE, NUTGROVE, PARR STOCKS, PEASLEY CROSS, PHOENIX, POCKET NOOK, PRESCOT, PRESCOTT BROOK, THE RAINFORD COLLIERIES, VICTORIA, CRANK, VICTORIA, MILL LANE, MOSS HOUSE, RAVENHEAD, RED GATE, ROYAL, SANKEY BROOK, SHALEY BROW, SHERDLEY, SMITHY BROW, ST. HELENS, STANLEY, STOCKS, SUTTON HEATH, SUTTON MANOR, UNION, WINDLE. Compiled by IAN WINSTANLEY These notes have been compiled from St. Helens, and Wigan Newspapers, magazine and perodical articles and official and unoffical sources. They are ‘notes’ and any errors, inaccuracies and mistakes are mine. Ian Winstanley, Jan. 2001. Coal Mining History ResourceCentre With Compliments The Coal Mining History Resource Centre, Picks Publishing and Ian Winstanley reserves the copyright. Ian Winstanley. 83, Greenfields Crescent, Tel & Fax;- (01942) 723675. Ashton-in-Makerfield, Mobile:- (0798) 9624461 Wigan. WN4 8QY. E-mail:- [email protected] Lancashire. England Web site:- http://www.cmhrc.pwp.blueyomder.co.uk © Ian Winstanley 2001 Copyright reserved by Ian Winstanley, Picks Publishing and The Coal Mining History Resource Centre. NO PART OF THIS WORK MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED. COPIES OF THE WHOLE DOCUMENT ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE ABOVE ADDRESS £10.00 incl. p&p. KEY PR Prescot Reporter. WO Wigan Observer WE Wigan Examiner St.HSTD St. Helens Standard St.HN&A. St.Helens Newspaper and Advertiser. WO Wigan Observer CG Colliery Guardian MIR Mines Inspectors Report CONTENTS COLLINS GREEN. .......................................................................................................... 4 CRONTON.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Climate Change Impacts of Waste Incineration in the United Kingdom
    UNITED KINGDOM WITHOUT INCINERATION NETWORK Evaluation of the climate change impacts of waste incineration in the United Kingdom October 2018 (Rev 1.01: April 2019) KEY FINDINGS Based on the data and methods set out in the report, the study found that: ▶ Waste incinerators currently release an average of around 1 tonne of CO2 for every tonne of waste incinerated. ▶ The release of CO2 from incinerators makes climate change worse and comes with a cost to society that is not paid by those incinerating waste. ▶ In 2017 the UK's 42 incinerators released a combined total of nearly 11 million tonnes of CO2, around 5 million tonnes of which were from fossil sources such as plastic. ▶ The 5 million tonnes of fossil CO2 released by UK incinerators in 2017 resulted in an unpaid cost to society of around £325 million. ▶ Over the next 30 years the total cost to society of fossil CO2 released by UK's current incinerators would equate to more than £25 billion pounds of harm arising from the release of around 205 million tonnes of fossil CO2. ▶ Electricity generated by waste incineration has significantly higher adverse climate change impacts than electricity generated through the conventional use of fossil fuels such as gas. ▶ The 'carbon intensity' of energy produced through waste incineration is more than 23 times greater than that for low carbon sources such as wind and solar; as such, incineration is clearly not a low carbon technology. ▶ When waste is landfilled a large proportion of the carbon is stored underground, whereas when waste is burned at an incinerator the carbon is converted into CO2 and immediately released into the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 St Helens Historic Character - Analysis
    9 St Helens Historic Character - Analysis 9.1 Field System Broad Type About 48.3% (6607.32 ha) of St Helens has been classified as Field System. Much of this is concentrated in the north, south and extreme eastern parts of the district. The central and centre-east parts of the district are predominantly residential and/or industrial in nature. In general, field systems have declined in number and size from the mid 19th century, having been replaced (consumed) by industrial and residential growth. Figure 18 Current (2003) Field System Sub Type in Sefton (© Crown Copyright and database right 2003. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence Number 100019088. English Heritage) 60 Field System (Shape and Number of Area Percentage Size) Polygons (Hectares) Irregular Small 23 78.88 1.19 Irregular Medium 5 46.86 0.71 Semi-regular Large 115 1301.49 19.70 Semi-regular Medium 221 1866.72 28.25 Semi-regular Small 169 784.07 11.87 Regular Large 22 203.53 3.08 Regular Medium 79 795.08 12.03 Regular Small 283 1530.68 23.17 Total 917 6607.32 100% Table 8 Current (2003) Field System Sub Type in St Helens (Shape and Size Attributes) The MHCP only recorded the shape and size attributes of field systems within the borough of St Helens. Further more detailed research would be required to define field types or possible origins. It must be noted that periods of origin assigned to areas of fields during the course of the MHCP are based on intuition and the interpretation of enclosure patterns shown on 10th century and later mapping and do not constitute a detailed or definitive study.
    [Show full text]
  • St Helens Council – Bold Forest Park AAP
    St Helens Council – Bold Forest Park AAP APPENDICES BOLD FOREST PARK – LOCAL BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT (DRAFT) June 2012 6 St Helens Council – Bold Forest Park AAP APPENDIX 1 - CONSULTATION AND COMMUNICATION PLAN BOLD FOREST PARK – LOCAL BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT (DRAFT) June 2012 7 Bold Forest Park Stakeholder and Community Consultation and Communications Plan 27th February 2012 Consultation Details Target Responsibilities Detailed actions Date Venue & Time Materials Comments Activity audience required required Prepare Issue Draft Stakeholder Steering URS to draft and 27 N/A N/A Stakeholder and and Communications Group and circulate for February Communications Strategy to Steering Bold Parish approval Plan Group Council Press Release: Press release informing Local URS to prepare CC has advised 20-22 Potential Websites Press Release – local people of the Community press release: Press Release March (TBC): content to be Local Press, upcoming consultation and wider material would approved by RR Social Media programme: NW RR to sign-off need to be with Timing to Bold Forest Park websites such as th community Press team 1 or 2 coincide (live for 20 March) St Helens th Council’s Press 20 March stakeholder days before with Facebook and Officer (Chris Mersey Forest and community session release, with stakeholde Twitter accounts Cahill) to distribute r/ business Easter Garden Stall Friday deadline St Helens Council for press consultatio website, (Easter weekend?) n event) coverage in the Bold Parish Community
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for St Helens
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for St Helens Report to The Electoral Commission March 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 327 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 47 Appendix A Final recommendations for St Helens: Detailed mapping 48 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 50 C First draft of electoral change Order for St Helens 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • St Helens Historic Settlement Study
    St Helens Historic Settlement Study Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project December 2011 Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project Museum of Liverpool Pier Head Liverpool L3 1DG © Trustees of National Museums Liverpool and English Heritage 2011 Contents Introduction to Historic Settlement Study................................................................... 1 Billinge (Chapel End)................................................................................................. 4 Bold........................................................................................................................... 7 Eccleston ................................................................................................................ 10 Haydock.................................................................................................................. 14 Newton-le-Willows................................................................................................... 17 Parr ......................................................................................................................... 21 Rainford .................................................................................................................. 24 Rainhill .................................................................................................................... 27 St Helens ................................................................................................................ 31 Sutton ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project Museum of Liverpool Pier Head Liverpool L3 1DG
    Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project St Helens Report December 2011 Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project Museum of Liverpool Pier Head Liverpool L3 1DG © Trustees of National Museums Liverpool and English Heritage 2011 Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................xx 1 Summary and Introduction ................................................................... 1 1.1 The project.................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Context – the national HLC programme ...................................................... 2 1.3 Characterisation of urban areas .................................................................. 4 1.4 Applications................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Use of this report......................................................................................... 6 2 Aims and Objectives ............................................................................ 7 2.1 Overall General Aim.................................................................................... 7 2.2 General Objectives...................................................................................... 7 2.3 Historic Environment Objectives.................................................................. 7 3 Methodology ........................................................................................ 9 3.1 Characterisation
    [Show full text]