DOCSLIB.ORG

Monkeys and Prosimians: Social Learning D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monkeys and Prosimians: Social Learning D Monkeys and Prosimians: Social Learning D. M. Fragaszy and J. Crast, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA ã 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction Tarsiiformes (tarsiers of Southeast Asia). All prosimians live in tropical habitats in Africa and Asia and the vast In this chapter, we highlight examples of social influ- majority are arboreal and nocturnal. Prosimians are some- ences on learning observed in prosimians and monkeys times referred to as ‘living fossils’ because they appear to and consider the role of socially mediated learning in have some physical similarities to ancestral primates of the biology of these animals. Learning is always the approximately 50 Mya. In general, prosimians rely to a outcome of interacting physical, social, and individual greater extent than other primates on olfaction. Some are factors and takes place over time. Thus, we cannot parse solitary foragers; others travel and forage in groups ranging learning, either as a process or as an outcome, into from small family units to larger social groups of as many as portions that are socially influenced and portions that 27 individuals. Weknow less about the lifestyles and behav- are not. Instead, we can document how social processes ior of prosimians than of monkeys. affect behavior relevant to the learning process, and In comparison with prosimians, species in the suborder we can seek evidence for social contributions to learning Anthropoidea are characterized by a relatively larger outcomes. brain for their body mass, diurnal lifestyle, and a greater To begin, we provide some background on the taxo- reliance on vision than on olfaction. Anthropoid species nomic groups of interest in this chapter: monkeys and generally exhibit greater manual dexterity than prosi- prosimians. Primates are a remarkably diverse order. Body mians, and anthropoids are more likely to live in groups. size alone spans three orders of magnitude, from tiny pro- New World monkeys (infraorder Platyrrhini) are arboreal simians weighing a few hundred grams to massive apes and relatively small-bodied, ranging in size from approxi- weighing more than 100 kg. Diet, morphology, mating mately 100 g (the pygmy marmoset [Cebuella pygmaea]) up systems, locomotor style, life history, and every other to 10 kg (the muriqui [Brachyteles arachnoides] and spider aspect of the biology of these animals is as diverse as body monkey [Genus Ateles]). Many genera live in small family size, and this diversity is important when considering groups; others live in medium-to-large social groups the contributions of the social context to learning in par- (as many as 50–60 individuals). Within the New World ticular species. monkeys are the subfamilies Callitrichinae (marmosets and tamarins), Atelinae (muriquis, woolly, howler, and spider monkeys), Pitheciinae (titis, sakis, bearded sakis, Phylogeny of Prosimians and Monkeys and uakaris), Cebinae (squirrel monkeys and capuchins), and Aotinae (owl monkeys, the only nocturnal anthro- As Fleagle (1999) discusses in greater detail, the order poid). During the platyrrhine radiation in the Americas, Primates includes two suborders: Prosimii, prosimians, and the genera adapted to distinct niches, making a living in Anthropoidea, monkeys, apes, and humans (see Figure 1). different parts of the forest canopy and resulting in great The two suborders have evolved separately for at least diversity in social organization, reproductive strategy, 55 Million years. Two infraorders are classified within diet, and locomotor style. Anthropoidea: the platyrrhines (New World monkeys) Compared to New World monkeys, Old World monkeys and catarrhines (Old World monkeys, apes, and humans). (superfamily Cercopithecoidea) are mostly larger-bodied, New and Old World monkeys diverged approximately ranging from around 1 kg to approximately 30 kg, and some 40 Millions of years ago (Mya), and apes and hominids are terrestrial. Old World monkeys include subfamilies (hominids include modern humans and their ancestors; Cercopithecinae (baboons, mandrills, drills, macaques, superfamily Hominoidea) diverged from the Old World mangabeys, and guenons) and Colobinae (colobus monkeys monkeys (superfamily Cercopithecoidea) approximately and langurs), which differ particularly in their dietary adap- 20 Mya. Given their lengthy independent evolution, vari- tations (see Fleagle for details). Most cercopithecoid species ation in the life histories, body sizes, social organizations, live in large polygamous social groups with clear dominance etc., within each suborder, infraorder, and superfamily in hierarchies within and between matrilines (female kin the order Primates is to be expected. groups), and some form multilevel societies during parts The suborder Prosimii includes the infraorders Lemur- of the year. Of all primate superfamilies, cercopithecoids iformes (the lemurs of Madagascar), Lorisiformes (the have the widest geographic range, greatest number of spe- lorises of Africa and Asia and the galagos of Africa), and cies, and form some of the largest groups and biomass 468 Monkeys and Prosimians: Social Learning 469 Order Primates Suborder Prosimii* Anthropoidea (all prosimians: lemurs, (monkeys, apes, lorises, galagos, and tarsiers) and humans) Infraorder Lemuriformes Lorisiformes Tarsiiformes* Platyrrhini Catarrhini (all lemurs) (all lorises (the tarsiers) (all new world (all old world monkeys, and galagos) monkeys) apes, and humans) Superfamily Ceboidea Cercopithecoidea Hominoidea (all new world (all old world (apes and humans) monkeys) monkeys) + Family Callitrichidae Atelidae Cebidae Cercopithecidae Hylobatidae Pongidae Hominidae (marmosets and (howlers, spider (squirrel (all old world (gibbons and (the great apes) (humans) tamarins) monkeys, and monkeys, capuchins, monkeys) siamangs) muriquis) owl monkeys, etc.) Subfamily Cercopithecinae Colobinae (baboons, macaques, (colobus species, guenons, etc.) langurs) Genus Pongo Gorilla Pan Homo All primates All monkeys All anthropoids All apes All hominoids All hominids (including extinct Pygmaeus Gorilla Troglodytes Sapiens All prosimians forms and modern humans) (orangutans) (3 subspecies) (chimpanzees) Species (2 subspecies) (3 subspecies) paniscus (bonobos) *There is some disagreement among primatologists concerning where to place tarsiers. Many researchers +Fleagle (1999) and others have recently eliminated the family callitrichidae and included marmosets suggest that they more properly belong closer to the anthropoids and thus revise the primate classifications and tamarins in the family cebidae. to reflect this view. Here, for simplicity, we continue to use the traditional classifications. Figure 1 Primate taxonomic classification. This abbreviated taxonomy illustrates how primates are grouped into increasingly specific categories. Only the more general categories are shown, except for the great apes and humans. Reproduced from Turnbaugh WA, Nelson H, Jurmain R, and Kilgore L (2002) Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th edn., with permission from Wadsworth. densities in the primate order. Despite this, Old World social partners in a way different from that of species that monkeys have less diversity in diet and social organization are highly reliant on vision. Third, motor patterns and than New World monkeys. action proclivities vary considerably across species. For example, leaf-eating monkeys are generally less likely to Phylogeny and Socially Mediated manipulate objects spontaneously than species that feed on Learning seeds and nuts. Finally, the variability in behavioral ecology across species means that individuals of different species are interested in different kinds of activities, locations, This brief review of primate phylogeny suggests some objects, and events. For example, leaf-eating monkeys reasons why we might expect socially mediated learning may be less likely to attend to sequences of actions during to vary across primate taxa. First, group demographics and feeding than are seed- or nut-eating species; omnivorous social dynamics within groups define the social context, species are less likely to attend to the odor of leaves eaten and thus influence socially mediated learning within a by another than are dietary specialists. Behavioral priorities group. The number of groupmates, their age and sex, and and proclivities of each species constrain what an individ- the nature of social relationships within the group vary ual is likely to learn in the first place, and thus the role of enormously across species, and may vary considerably social context in learning. within species as well. Groups of monkeys of the same species may live in smallish groups (4–7 individuals) or quite large groups (more than 40 individuals) depending on the local distribution of resources. Second, reliance on The Sources of Social Context various sensory modalities (vision, olfaction, audition, and Social Organization touch) in social interaction and in general activity varies across taxa. For example, species that are particularly atten- The social organization (i.e., the size, demographic com- tive to smell (such as many prosimians) will be affected by position, and spatiotemporal coordination of individuals 470 Monkeys and Prosimians: Social Learning within a group) and social relationships among individuals juveniles; adult males most slowly or not at all. If social in a group provide the boundaries of the social context in influences contributed to the spread of the behavior, it did which an individual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED on Γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22, 3, 337-344 Phylogenetic(1999) relationships of Brazilian howler monkeys 337 PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED ON γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES Carla Maria Meireles1, John Czelusniak1, Stephen F. Ferrari2, Maria Paula Cruz Schneider2 and Morris Goodman1 ABSTRACT The genus Alouatta (howler monkeys) is the most widely distributed of New World primates, and has been arranged in three species groups: the Central American Alouatta palliata group and the South American Alouatta seniculus and Alouatta caraya groups. While the latter is monotypic, the A. seniculus group encompasses at least three species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul and A. fusca). In the present study, approximately 600 base pairs of the γ1-globin pseudogene were sequenced in the four Brazilian species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul, A. fusca and A. caraya). Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods yielded phylogenetic trees with the same arrangement: {A. caraya [A. seniculus (A. fusca, A. belzebul)]}. The most parsimoni- ous tree had bootstrap values greater than 82% for all groupings, and strength of grouping values of at least 2, supporting the sister clade of A. fusca and A. belzebul. The study also confirmed the presence of a 150-base pair Alu insertion element and a 1.8-kb deletion in the γ1-globin pseudogene in A. fusca, features found previously in the remaining three species. The cladistic classification based on molecular data agrees with those of morphological studies, with the monospecific A. caraya group being clearly differentiated from the A. seniculus group. INTRODUCTION southern Mexico to northern Argentina, and is found in tropical and subtropical forest ecosystems throughout Bra- The systematics of the New World monkeys (infra- zil (Hirsch et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Development Team
    Paper No. : 14 Human Origin and Evolution Module : 09 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Dr. Satwanti Kapoor (Retd Professor) Paper Coordinator Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Mr. Vijit Deepani & Prof. A.K. Kapoor Content Writer Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. R.K. Pathak Content Reviewer Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 1 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Anthropology Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name Human Origin and Evolution Module Name/Title Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Module Id 09 Contents: Primates: A brief Outline Classification of Living Primates Distribution of Living Primates Summary Learning Objectives: To understand the classification of living primates. To discern the distribution of living primates. 2 Classification and Distribution of Living Primates Anthropology Primates: A brief Outline Primates reside at the initial stage in the series of evolution of man and therefore constitute the first footstep of man’s origin. Primates are primarily mammals possessing several basic mammalian features such as presence of mammary glands, dense body hair; heterodonty, increased brain size, endothermy, a relatively long gestation period followed by live birth, considerable capacity for learning and behavioural flexibility. St. George J Mivart (1873) defined Primates (as an order)
    [Show full text]
  • Somatosensory Cortex of Prosimian Galagos
    THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 457:263–292 (2003) Somatosensory Cortex of Prosimian Galagos: Physiological Recording, Cytoarchitecture, and Corticocortical Connections of Anterior Parietal Cortex and Cortex of the Lateral Sulcus CAROLYN W.-H. WU1,2 AND JON H. KAAS1* 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240 2Human Cortical Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1428 ABSTRACT Compared with our growing understanding of the organization of somatosensory cortex in monkeys, little is known about prosimian primates, a major branch of primate evolution that diverged from anthropoid primates some 60 million years ago. Here we describe extensive results obtained from an African prosimian, Galago garnetti. Microelectrodes were used to record from large numbers of cortical sites in order to reveal regions of responsiveness to cutaneous stimuli and patterns of somatotopic organization. Injections of one to several distinguishable tracers were placed at physiologically identified sites in four different cortical areas to label corticortical connections. Both types of results were related to cortical architecture. Three systematic repre- sentations of cutaneous receptors were revealed by the microelectrode recordings, S1 proper or area 3b, S2, and the parietal ventral area (PV), as described in monkeys. Strips of cortex rostral (presumptive area 3a) and caudal (presumptive area 1–2) to area 3b responded poorly to tactile stimuli in anesthetized galagos, but connection patterns with area 3b indicated that parallel somatosensory representations exist in both of these regions. Area 3b also interconnected soma- totopically with areas S2 and PV. Areas S2 and PV had connections with areas 3a, 3b, 1–2, each other, other regions of the lateral sulcus, motor cortex (M1), cingulate cortex, frontal cortex, orbital cortex, and inferior parietal cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascinating Primates 3/4/13 8:09 AM Ancient Egyptians Used Traits of an Ibis Or a Hamadryas Used Traits Egyptians Ancient ) to Represent Their God Thoth
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Fascinating Primates Fascinating The Beginning of an Adventure Ever since the time of the fi rst civilizations, nonhuman primates and people have oc- cupied overlapping habitats, and it is easy to imagine how important these fi rst contacts were for our ancestors’ philosophical refl ections. Long ago, adopting a quasi- scientifi c view, some people accordingly regarded pri- mates as transformed humans. Others, by contrast, respected them as distinct be- ings, seen either as bearers of sacred properties or, conversely, as diabolical creatures. A Rapid Tour around the World In Egypt under the pharaohs, science and religion were still incompletely separated. Priests saw the Papio hamadryas living around them as “brother baboons” guarding their temples. In fact, the Egyptian god Thoth was a complex deity combining qualities of monkeys and those of other wild animal species living in rice paddies next to temples, all able to sound the alarm if thieves were skulking nearby. At fi rst, baboons represented a local god in the Nile delta who guarded sacred sites. The associated cult then spread through middle Egypt. Even- tually, this god was assimilated by the Greeks into Hermes Trismegistus, the deity measuring and interpreting time, the messenger of the gods. One conse- quence of this deifi cation was that many animals were mummifi ed after death to honor them. Ancient Egyptians used traits of an ibis or a Hamadryas Baboon (Papio hamadryas) to represent their god Thoth.
    [Show full text]
  • Exam 1 Set 3 Taxonomy and Primates
    Goodall Films • Four classic films from the 1960s of Goodalls early work with Gombe (Tanzania —East Africa) chimpanzees • Introduction to Chimpanzee Behavior • Infant Development • Feeding and Food Sharing • Tool Using Primates! Specifically the EXTANT primates, i.e., the species that are still alive today: these include some prosimians, some monkeys, & some apes (-next: fossil hominins, who are extinct) Diversity ...200$300&species& Taxonomy What are primates? Overview: What are primates? • Taxonomy of living • Prosimians (Strepsirhines) – Lorises things – Lemurs • Distinguishing – Tarsiers (?) • Anthropoids (Haplorhines) primate – Platyrrhines characteristics • Cebids • Atelines • Primate taxonomy: • Callitrichids distinguishing characteristics – Catarrhines within the Order Primate… • Cercopithecoids – Cercopithecines – Colobines • Hominoids – Hylobatids – Pongids – Hominins Taxonomy: Hierarchical and Linnean (between Kingdoms and Species, but really not a totally accurate representation) • Subspecies • Species • Genus • Family • Infraorder • Order • Class • Phylum • Kingdom Tree of life -based on traits we think we observe -Beware anthropocentrism, the concept that humans may regard themselves as the central and most significant entities in the universe, or that they assess reality through an exclusively human perspective. Taxonomy: Kingdoms (6 here) Kingdom Animalia • Ingestive heterotrophs • Lack cell wall • Motile at at least some part of their lives • Embryos have a blastula stage (a hollow ball of cells) • Usually an internal
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of the Central American Squirrel Monkey
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2005 The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Burghardt, Liana, "The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context" (2005). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 435. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/435 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Survival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt Carleton College Fall 2005 Burghardt 2 I dedicate this paper which documents my first scientific adventure in the field to my father. “It is often necessary to put aside the objective measurements favored in controlled laboratory environments and to adopt a more subjective naturalistic viewpoint in order to see pattern and consistency in the rich, varied context of the natural environment” (Baldwin and Baldwin 1971: 48). Acknowledgments This paper has truly been an adventure and as is common I have many people I wish to thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Photopigments and Color Vision in the Nocturnal Monkey, Aotus GERALD H
    Vision Res. Vol. 33, No. 13, pp. 1773-1783, 1993 0042-6989/93 $6.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved Copyright 0 1993 Pergamon Press Ltd Photopigments and Color Vision in the Nocturnal Monkey, Aotus GERALD H. JACOBS,*? JESS F. DEEGAN II,* JAY NEITZ,$ MICHAEL A. CROGNALE,§ MAUREEN NEITZT Received 6 November 1992; in revised form 3 February 1993 The owl monkey (Aotus tridrgutus) is the only nocturnal monkey. The photopigments of Aotus and the relationship between these photopigments and visual discrimination were examined through (1) an analysis of the tlicker photometric electroretinogram (ERG), (2) psychophysical tests of visual sensitivity and color vision, and (3) a search for the presence of the photopigment gene necessary for the production of a short-wavelength sensitive (SWS) photopigment. Roth electrophysiological and behavioral measurements indicate that in addition to a rod photopigment the retina of this primate contains only one other photopigment type-a cone pigment having a spectral peak cu 543 nm. Earlier results that suggested these monkeys can make crude color discriminations are interpreted as probably resulting from the joint exploitation of signals from rods and cones. Although Aotus has no functional SWS photopigment, hybridization analysis shows that A&us has a pigment gene that is highly homologous to the human SWS photopigment gene. Aotus trivirgatus Cone photopigments Monkey color vision Monochromacy Photopigment genes Evolution of color vision INTRODUCTION interest to anyone interested in visual adaptations for two somewhat contradictory reasons. On the one hand, The owl monkey (A&us) is unique among present study of A&us might provide the possibility of docu- day monkeys in several regards.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 30:75-105 (1987) Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates FREDERICK S. SZALAY, ALFRED L. ROSENBERGER, AND MARIAN DAGOSTO Department of Anthropolog* Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10021 (F.S.S.); University of Illinois, Urbanq Illinois 61801 (A.L. R.1; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, h4D 21218 (M.B.) KEY WORDS Semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, Suborders Strepsirhini and Haplorhini, Semisuborder Anthropoidea, Cranioskeletal morphology, Adapidae, Omomyidae, Grades vs. monophyletic (paraphyletic or holophyletic) taxa ABSTRACT We contrast our approach to a phylogenetic diagnosis of the order Primates, and its various supraspecific taxa, with definitional proce- dures. The order, which we divide into the semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, is clearly diagnosable on the basis of well-corroborated informa- tion from the fossil record. Lists of derived features which we hypothesize to have been fixed in the first representative species of the Primates, Eupri- mates, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea, are presented. Our clas- sification of the order includes both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups, depending on the nature of the available evidence. We discuss in detail the problematic evidence of the basicranium in Paleo- gene primates and present new evidence for the resolution of previously controversial interpretations. We renew and expand our emphasis on postcra- nial analysis of fossil and living primates to show the importance of under- standing their evolutionary morphology and subsequent to this their use for understanding taxon phylogeny. We reject the much advocated %ladograms first, phylogeny next, and scenario third” approach which maintains that biologically founded character analysis, i.e., functional-adaptive analysis and paleontology, is irrelevant to genealogy hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of the Newworld Monkey Phylogeny Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciências, Vol
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências ISSN: 0001-3765 [email protected] Academia Brasileira de Ciências Brasil Schneider, Horacio The current status of the NewWorld Monkey Phylogeny Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 72, núm. 2, jun;, 2000, pp. 165-172 Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32772205 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative The Current Status of the New World Monkey Phylogeny∗ ∗∗ HORACIO SCHNEIDER Campus Universitário de Bragança, Universidade Federal do Pará, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, s/n – 68600-000 Bragança, Pará, Brazil Manuscript received on January 31, 2000; accepted for publication on February 2, 2000 ABSTRACT Four DNA datasets were combined in tandem (6700 bp) and Maximum parsimony and Neighbor-Joining analyses were performed. The results suggest three groups emerging almost at the same time: Atelidae, Pitheciidae and Cebidae. The total analysis strongly supports the monophyly of the Cebidae family, group- ing Aotus, Cebus and Saimiri with the small callitrichines. In the callitrichines, the data link Cebuela to Callithrix, place Callimico as a sister group of Callithrix/Cebuella, and show Saguinus to be the earliest offshoot of the callitrichines. In the family Pithecidae, Callicebus is the basal genus. Finally, combined molecular data showed congruent branching in the atelid clade, setting up Alouatta as the basal lineage and Brachyteles-Lagothrix as a sister group and the most derived branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Stasis of the Pseudoautosomal Boundary In
    Evolutionary stasis of the pseudoautosomal boundary in strepsirrhine primates Rylan Shearn, Alison E Wright, Sylvain Mousset, Corinne Régis, Simon Penel, Jean-François Lemaître, Guillaume Douay, Brigitte Crouau-Roy, Emilie Lecompte, Gabriel Ab Marais To cite this version: Rylan Shearn, Alison E Wright, Sylvain Mousset, Corinne Régis, Simon Penel, et al.. Evolutionary stasis of the pseudoautosomal boundary in strepsirrhine primates. eLife, eLife Sciences Publication, 2020, 9, 10.7554/eLife.63650. hal-03064964 HAL Id: hal-03064964 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03064964 Submitted on 14 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SHORT REPORT Evolutionary stasis of the pseudoautosomal boundary in strepsirrhine primates Rylan Shearn1, Alison E Wright2, Sylvain Mousset1,3, Corinne Re´ gis1, Simon Penel1, Jean-Franc¸ois Lemaitre1, Guillaume Douay4, Brigitte Crouau-Roy5, Emilie Lecompte5, Gabriel AB Marais1,6* 1Laboratoire Biome´trie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; 2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; 3Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 4Zoo de Lyon, Lyon, France; 5Laboratoire Evolution et Diversite´ Biologique, CNRS / Univ. Toulouse, Toulouse, France; 6LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Dept, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Abstract Sex chromosomes are typically comprised of a non-recombining region and a recombining pseudoautosomal region.
    [Show full text]
  • Goeldi's Monkey
    Goeldi’s Monkey (Callimico) Callimico goeldii Class: Mammalia Order: Primates Family: Callitrichidae Characteristics: Goeldi’s monkeys are very small primates. They are approximately the size of a squirrel. These monkeys are very dark in color, ranging in shades of black and brown. They have a mane-like appearance with longer fur near the head and neck. The Goeldi’s monkeys have claws on all of their digits except the second. These small primates weigh only 22oz on average. They have a body length that is in the range of 8-12 inches. The non-prehensile tail is usually longer than the body. (Primate Info Net) Behavior: The Goeldi’s monkey lives in small family groups usually consisting of a breeding pair and other family members. These groups will Range & Habitat: Upper Amazonian rainforests of grow up to 10 individuals in size. They are very social animals and will southern Colombia, eastern spend a great deal of time grooming and communicating with Ecuador and Peru, western Brazil, vocalizations, scent, facial, and body language. (Animal Diversity) This and northern Bolivia. monkey forages in the understory of the forest and rarely goes up into the canopy. They are very agile and can leap up to 13 feet between branches! (Arkive) Reproduction: In the wild, mating occurs during the wet season of September through November. Females have a gestation of 145-152 days. The female will give birth to a single young twice a year. The mother will care for the newborn for 10-20 days, then the rest of the family group will assist the mother.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use by Callicebus Coimbrai (Primates: Pitheciidae) and Sympatric Species in the Fragmented Landscape of the Atlantic Forest of Southern Sergipe, Brazil
    ZOOLOGIA 27 (6): 853–860, December, 2010 doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702010000600003 Habitat use by Callicebus coimbrai (Primates: Pitheciidae) and sympatric species in the fragmented landscape of the Atlantic Forest of southern Sergipe, Brazil Renata Rocha Déda Chagas1, 3 & Stephen F. Ferrari2 1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Avenida Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, 49.100-000 São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil. 2 Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe. Avenida Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, 49100-000 São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil. 3 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Anthropogenic habitat fragmentation is a chronic problem throughout the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. In the present study, four forest fragments of 60-120 ha were surveyed on a rural property in southern Sergipe, where two endangered primate species, Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth, 1999 and Cebus xanthosternos Wied-Neuwied, 1826, are found. Two transects were established in each fragment, and the predominant habitat in 50 m sectors was assigned to one of three categories (mature forest, secondary forest and anthropogenic forest). Standard line transect surveys of the resident primate populations – which included a third species, Callitrhix jacchus Linnaeus, 1758 – were conducted, with a total of 476 km walked transect, resulting in 164 primate sightings. At each sighting of a primate, the habitat class was recorded and the height of the individual above the ground was estimated. The analysis indicated a significant (p < 0.05) preference for mature forest in C. xanthosternos which was also observed more frequently in the larger and better preserved fragments.
    [Show full text]