Season 2010 Season 2010-2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Season 2010 Season 2010-2011 Season 20102010----20112011 The Philadelphia Orchestra Sunday, November 2121,, at 3:00 22262666thth Season of Chamber Music ConcertsConcerts————PerelmanPerelman Theater Dvořák Terzetto in C major, Op. 74, for two violins and viola I. Introduzione: Allegro, ma non troppo— II. Larghetto III. Scherzo: Vivace IV. Tema con variazioni: Poco adagio David Kim Violin Daniel Han Violin Anna Marie Ahn Petersen Viola Shostakovich String Quartet No. 8 in C minor, Op. 110 I. Largo— II. Allegro molto— III. Allegretto— IV. Largo— V. Largo David Kim Violin Daniel Han Violin Anna Marie Ahn Petersen Viola Thomas Kraines Cello (Guest) Intermission Schubert String Quintet in C major, D. 956 I. Allegro, ma non troppo II. Adagio III. Scherzo: Presto—Trio: Andante sostenuto IV. Allegretto Leonidas Kavakos Violin (Guest) MeiMei----ChenChen Barnes Violin (Guest) CheChe----HungHung Chen Viola Derek Barnes Cello Efe Baltacıgil Cello This program runs approximately 2hours. Terzetto in C major, Op. 74, for two violins and viola Antonín DvDvořáořáořáořákkkk Born in Nelahozeves, Bohemia, SeSeptemberptember 8, 1841 Died in Prague, May 1, 1904 Antonín Dvořák was born in a small Bohemian village to a non-musical family, but his talents were so evident—he played organ at church while still a little boy, and picked up violin and viola by ear—that even his parents knew something special was afoot. They sent him to Prague at age 12, where he studied at the National Conservatory. After graduation, young Antonín became a violinist for the Czech National Orchestra under the direction of Bedřich Smetana, whose opera The Bartered Bride and orchestral suite Má vlast (My Homeland) would give Czech music a classical voice. But Dvořák’s career as a composer stalled. Little of what he wrote before the age of 30 survives. In fact he went virtually unnoticed as a composer until 1873, when his choral work Hymnus won a prize adjudicated by the great German composer Johannes Brahms and Europe’s most powerful music critic, Eduard Hanslick. Beyond giving Dvořák the award, Brahms and Hanslick recognized a talent that had the potential to raise Czech music to the next level of importance and sophistication. With Brahms’s help, Dvořák’s music was published by the prestigious house of Simrock, and with Hanslick’s praise in his pocket he began to get prominent commissions. The remainder of Dvořák’s career consisted of one triumph after another, as he became known around the globe. He was invited to America, where the vast plains and diverse influences caused him to write two of his most famous scores: the Symphony No. 9 (“From the New World”) and the String Quartet nicknamed the “American.” The year 1887 found Dvořák at the top of his game. In one week of January that year he composed the Terzetto in C major, Op. 74. It is a perfect example of Hausmusik (“house music”), which is simply music originally intended not for the concert hall or recital but for friends to play their own entertainment. A piece of house music is first and foremost an interesting work for the musicians to perform, for they, and not an audience, are the market the composer and publisher attempt to reach. Dvořák wrote the Terzetto with two specific musicians in mind: the violinist Jan Pelikan of the National Theater Orchestra, and Pelikan’s student, violinist Josef Kruis. When, in a reading of the work, Kruis fell short of the skill level necessary, Dvořák, in sympathy, composed a second, simpler Terzetto, Op. 75a. In a sense, however, it was Dvořák who failed to fulfill the task of writing Hausmusik by composing, in the first Terzetto, a much richer and technically more demanding score than might be playable by an average musician. Part of the reason for this may have been that he used himself as a model for the violist; he was, in fact, violist for the first readings of the score by Pelikan and Kruis. Like many great composers before and after—Mozart and Hindemith are but two— Dvořák was particularly attracted to the viola, and fond of the instrument’s ability to negotiate the alto range. The viola’s middle place in the range of string instruments means it defines the texture of a string score. The soprano-range violin gets the melody, the cello provides the bass, and in between, the viola fills out the rest—but it is precisely how the filling-out is done that goes far to give a composition its particular character. Despite the fact that in the Terzetto the viola is actually the de facto bass, the viola line throughout the score still carries with it the nature of a defining inner part. There are sections, including most of the scherzo, where the viola accepts the role of providing a bass. But for most of the time, the viola is in real dialogue with the violins, an equal partner in a contrapuntal discussion of sophistication and breadth. Marked simply “Introduction,” the opening AllegroAllegro,,,, ma non troppo is deceptively easy- going, a three-part (ABA) movement that does little more than let us hear the instruments, gauge their balance, and prepare for what’s coming. The A section is a simple lyrical melody; the B section provides some bustling sixteenth notes for contrast. Then, suddenly, just as the return of the A section seems about to go into its final measures, there is a shocking change from C major in the direction of an E-major cadence. The E-major tonic chord is delayed, however, until the start of the second movement, played without pause after the first. This is the Larghetto, marked dolce and molto espressivo, and as ethereal a piece as Dvořák ever penned. The ensuing Scherzo (VivaceVivaceVivace) is an A-minor furiant, or rapid-fire Czech folk dance, with a three-beat meter that sometimes gives the illusion of being in two. The gently contrasting Trio in A major is reminiscent of a Brahms allegretto. The final movement (PocoPoco adagioadagio) is a set of variations on a theme surprisingly in C minor rather than C major, though the fleet, inventive variations do eventually lead to a C-major conclusion. By this movement, the Hausmusik aspect of the score has long been overtaken by virtuoso elements that now come to the foreground for all three instruments. —Kenneth LaFave String Quartet No. 8 in C minor, Op. 110 Dmitri Shostakovich Born iiinin St. Petersburg, September 25, 1906 Died iiinin Moscow, August 9, 1975 At Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow, one imposing tombstone is emblazoned with the musical notes D—E-flat—C—B. It’s the grave of Dmitri Shostakovich, whose initials, in German transliteration, those notes spell: D(mitri) SCH(ostakowitch). (In German musical notation, E-flat is “S” and B-natural is “H.”) This four-note musical motif was Shostakovich’s signature during the second half of his career. It shows up prominently in many of his scores, including the Tenth and Fifteenth symphonies, the First Violin Concerto, and the First Cello Concerto. But nowhere is it as ubiquitous as in the String Quartet No. 8, a somber meditation on death that, despite its surface bleakness, is the most widely played of the composer’s 15 string quartets, and one of the most-played string quartets written in the 20th century. The “DSCH” motif dominates the Quartet for the very good reason that the work was intended as a farewell. In 1960, when the piece was composed, Shostakovich was at an emotional lowpoint. Decades of fighting Stalinist control of his artistic output had taken their toll and he was a nervous wreck, his face “a bag of tics” as one friend commented. And although Stalin had been dead for seven years, Shostakovich’s relationship with the Soviet authorities in 1960 remained problematic at best. That was the year he finally joined the Communist Party, an act so fraught with ethical implications that the decision must have caused him great anxiety. We still don’t know for certain if the decision was entirely his, or if he was in some way coerced into joining. We do know his psychic strength was strained by the act of acquiescing to a political system that had repeatedly opposed his art. The composer’s physical health as well was in peril. In 1958 he had begun to notice chronic pain in his right hand. Joints and muscles in that hand started to shut down. Slowly the pain overtook him and by 1960 he could barely play the piano. (In 1965 the condition would be diagnosed as polio.) According his friend Lev Lebedinsky, Shostakovich’s response to all this was to plan his suicide. In just three days in July 1960, he penned his suicide “letter”: the String Quartet No. 8, with its three-out-of-five Largo movements, dirge-like overall character, and obsessive employment of “DSCH.” The writing of the Quartet proved less a valedictory than a purgative, however, so Shostakovich went on living—and composing, including seven more string quartets. The suicide story, uncorroborated by other sources, may or may not be true. But it’s clear that Shostakovich had by this time entered a morbid phase of his artistic life. Death would be the subject of many remaining works, such as the Symphony No. 14. If the String Quartet No. 8 is not a literal farewell, it is certainly the beginning of a series of goodbyes. The Quartet’s first movement, marked Largo, begins with the “DSCH” motif intoned in turn by all four instruments and played in various keys until, 28 measures in, the cello, viola, and second violin all fall softly onto their bottommost open notes in a gesture of release.
Recommended publications
  • Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 As a Contribution to the Violist's
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 A tale of lovers : Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 as a contribution to the violist's repertory Rafal Zyskowski Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Zyskowski, Rafal, "A tale of lovers : Chopin's Nocturne Op. 27, No. 2 as a contribution to the violist's repertory" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3366. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3366 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. A TALE OF LOVERS: CHOPIN’S NOCTURNE OP. 27, NO. 2 AS A CONTRIBUTION TO THE VIOLIST’S REPERTORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in The School of Music by Rafal Zyskowski B.M., Louisiana State University, 2008 M.M., Indiana University, 2010 May 2014 ©2014 Rafal Zyskowski All rights reserved ii Dedicated to Ms. Dorothy Harman, my best friend ever iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As always in life, the final outcome of our work results from a contribution that was made in one way or another by a great number of people. Thus, I want to express my gratitude to at least some of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Alla Zingarese August 5 and 6
    Concert Program V: Alla Zingarese August 5 and 6 Friday, August 5 F RANZ JOSEph HAYDN (1732–1809) 8:00 p.m., Stent Family Hall, Menlo School Rondo all’ongarese (Gypsy Rondo) from Piano Trio in G Major, Hob. XV: 25 (1795) S Jon Kimura Parker, piano; Elmar Oliveira, violin; David Finckel, cello Saturday, August 6 8:00 p.m., The Center for Performing Arts at Menlo-Atherton HErmaNN SchULENBURG (1886–1959) AM Puszta-Märchen (Gypsy Romance and Czardas) (1936) PROgram OVERVIEW CharlES ROBERT VALDEZ A lifelong fascination with popular music of all kinds—espe- Serenade du Tzigane (Gypsy Serenade) cially the Gypsy folk music that Hungarian refugees brought to Germany in the 1840s—resulted in some of Brahms’s most ANONYMOUS cap tivating works. The music Brahms composed alla zinga- The Canary rese—in the Gypsy style—constitutes a vital dimension of his Wu Han, piano; Paul Neubauer, viola creative identity. Concert Program V surrounds Brahms’s lusty Hungarian Dances with other examples of compos- JOHANNES BrahmS (1833–1897) PROGR ERT ers drawing from Eastern European folk idioms, including Selected Hungarian Dances, WoO 1, Book 1 (1868–1869) C Hungarian Dance no. 1 in g minor; Hungarian Dance no. 6 in D-flat Major; the famous rondo “in the Gypsy style” from Joseph Haydn’s Hungarian Dance no. 5 in f-sharp minor G Major Piano Trio; the Slavonic Dances of Brahms’s pro- Wu Han, Jon Kimura Parker, piano ON tégé Antonín Dvorˇák; and Maurice Ravel’s Tzigane, a paean C to the Hun garian violin virtuoso Jelly d’Arányi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Senior Recital
    Senior Recitals Recitals 4-7-2008 A Senior Recital Audrey Hansen University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/music_senior_recitals Part of the Music Performance Commons Repository Citation Hansen, A. (2008). A Senior Recital. 1-1. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/music_senior_recitals/1 This Music Program is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Music Program in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Music Program has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Recitals by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. illi1YThe University Of Nevada Las Ve gas Co ll e~e of Fine Arts Ocparlmenl o f Music Pre:senls A Senior Recital Audrey Hansen, ptano ~Program~ ._a Conternplazione: Una Fantasia Piccola, Johann Nepomuk Hummel 1 Op. 107, No.3 (1778-1837) Deux Preludes Claude Achille Debussy Book 1, No.8: La fi/le aux cf7 eueux de /in (1862-1918) Book 2, No. 5: Bruyeres Ballades, Op. 10 Johannes Brahms No. 1 in D minor -Andante (1833-1897) No. 2 in D maj or -Andante No. 3 in B minor -Intermezzo No. 4 in B major - Andante con moto Papillons, Op.
    [Show full text]
  • A Russian Eschatology: Theological Reflections on the Music of Dmitri Shostakovich
    A Russian Eschatology: Theological Reflections on the Music of Dmitri Shostakovich Submitted by Anna Megan Davis to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology in December 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 2 3 Abstract Theological reflection on music commonly adopts a metaphysical approach, according to which the proportions of musical harmony are interpreted as ontologies of divine order, mirrored in the created world. Attempts to engage theologically with music’s expressivity have been largely rejected on the grounds of a distrust of sensuality, accusations that they endorse a ‘religion of aestheticism’ and concern that they prioritise human emotion at the expense of the divine. This thesis, however, argues that understanding music as expressive is both essential to a proper appreciation of the art form and of value to the theological task, and aims to defend and substantiate this claim in relation to the music of twentieth-century Russian composer Dmitri Shostakovich. Analysing a selection of his works with reference to culture, iconography, interiority and comedy, it seeks both to address the theological criticisms of musical expressivism and to carve out a positive theological engagement with the subject, arguing that the distinctive contribution of Shostakovich’s music to theological endeavour lies in relation to a theology of hope, articulated through the possibilities of the creative act.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Symphony October 2017 Encore
    OCTOBER 2017 LUDOVIC MORLOT, MUSIC DIRECTOR BEATRICE RANA PLAYS PROKOFIEV GIDON KREMER SCHUMANN VIOLIN CONCERTO LOOKING AHEAD: MORLOT C O N D U C T S BERLIOZ CONTENTS My wealth. My priorities. My partner. You’ve spent your life accumulating wealth. And, no doubt, that wealth now takes many forms, sits in many places, and is managed by many advisors. Unfortunately, that kind of fragmentation creates gaps that can hold your wealth back from its full potential. The Private Bank can help. The Private Bank uses a proprietary approach called the LIFE Wealth Cycle SM to ­ind those gaps—and help you achieve what is important to you. To learn more, please visit unionbank.com/theprivatebank or contact: Lisa Roberts Managing Director, Private Wealth Management [email protected] 4157057159 Wills, trusts, foundations, and wealth planning strategies have legal, tax, accounting, and other implications. Clients should consult a legal or tax advisor. ©2017 MUFG Union Bank, N.A. All rights reserved. Member FDIC. Union Bank is a registered trademark and brand name of MUFG Union Bank, N.A. EAP full-page template.indd 1 7/17/17 3:08 PM CONTENTS OCTOBER 2017 4 / CALENDAR 6 / THE SYMPHONY 10 / NEWS FEATURES 12 / BERLIOZ’S BARGAIN 14 / MUSIC & IMAGINATION CONCERTS 15 / October 5 & 7 ENIGMA VARIATIONS 19 / October 6 ELGAR UNTUXED 21 / October 12 & 14 GIDON KREMER SCHUMANN VIOLIN CONCERTO 24 / October 13 [UNTITLED] 1 26 / October 17 NOSFERATU: A SYMPHONY OF HORROR 27 / October 20, 21 & 27 VIVALDI FOUR SEASONS 30 / October 26 & 29 21 / GIDON KREMER SHOSTAKOVICH SYMPHONY NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Romantic Period 1850-1910 • Characteristics of Romantic Period
    Late Romantic Period 1850-1910 • Characteristics of Romantic Period o Emotion design over intellectual design o Individual over society o Music increased in length and changed emotion often in the same piece • Hector Berlioz (1803-1869) o French composer o Known for writing for large orchestras, sometimes over 1000 musicians o An Episode in the Life of an Artist (Symphonie Fantastique) • Convinced that his love is spurned, the artist poisons himself with opium. The dose of narcotic, while too weak to cause his death, plunges him into a heavy sleep accompanied by the strangest of visions. He dreams that he has killed his beloved, that he is condemned, led to the scaffold and is witnessing his own execution. The procession advances to the sound of a march that is sometimes sombre and wild, and sometimes brilliant and solemn, in which a dull sound of heavy footsteps follows without transition the loudest outbursts. At the end of the march, the first four bars of the idée fixe reappear like a final thought of love interrupted by the fatal blow. • Richard Wagner (1813-1883) o German composer and theatre director o Known for opera – big dramatic works • Built his own opera house in order to be able to accommodate his works • Subjects drawn from Norse mythology o Lohengrin – Bridal Chorus o Die Walkure • Franz Liszt (1811-1886) o Hungarian composer and virtuoso pianist o Used gypsy music as basis for compositions o Created modern piano playing technique o Invented the form of Symphonic Poem or Tone Poem Music based on art, literature, or other “nonmusical” idea One movement with several ‘ideas’ that move freely throughout the piece o Hungarian Rhapsody No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lied of Five German Composers.Pdf
    The Lied of Five German Composers A Senior Project presented to the Faculty of the Music Department of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts by Whitney Laine Westbrook June 2010 © 2010 Whitney Laine Westbrook The Lied of Five German Composers: List of Repertoire 1. “Fussreise” (2:54)…...………………………………..Hugo Wolf (1860-1903) 2. “Sapphische Ode” (2:30)………………………Johannes Brahms (1833-1897) 3. “Urlicht” (5:13)...…………………………………Gustav Mahler (1860-1911) 4. “Erhebung”(1:13)............................................Arnold Schoenberg (1874-1951) 5. “Morgen” (3:50).………………………………...Richard Strauss (1864-1949) Fussreise Hugo Filipp Jakob Wolf, born on March 13, 1860, in modern day Yugoslavia, experienced an early musical upbringing under the guidance of his father and later on studied with his local school teacher, Sebastian Weixler. Wolf displayed much musical promise, primarily within the realms of violin and piano. Although music exerted an influence over Wolf, school did not. Throughout his life, Wolf exercised a rebellion against many scholastic institutions, including the Conservatory of Vienna; this was his third school from which he withdrew. Having escaped school, Hugo Wolf attempted to make a living in many trades, including teaching piano and accompanying various other artists. Although he became a “Jack of All Trades,” a steady income was not reaching Wolf, and he continued on living in poverty. Wolf did excel as a music critic, a profession that did supply a small income and yet Wolf earned resentment from his musical colleagues. The harsh criticisms that flew from the quick-witted critic alienated certain musicians who in return refused Wolf any help.
    [Show full text]
  • Link Shostakovich.Txt
    FRAMMENTI DELL'OPERA "TESTIMONIANZA" DI VOLKOV: http://www.francescomariacolombo.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&i d=54&Itemid=65&lang=it LA BIOGRAFIA DEL MUSICISTA DA "SOSTAKOVIC" DI FRANCO PULCINI: http://books.google.it/books?id=2vim5XnmcDUC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=testimonianza+v olkov&source=bl&ots=iq2gzJOa7_&sig=3Y_drOErxYxehd6cjNO7R6ThVFM&hl=it&sa=X&ei=yUi SUbVkzMQ9t9mA2A0&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=testimonianza%20volkov&f=false LA PASSIONE PER IL CALCIO http://www.storiedicalcio.altervista.org/calcio_sostakovic.html CENNI SULLA BIOGRAFIA: http://www.52composers.com/shostakovich.html PERSONALITA' DEL MUSICISTA NELL'APPOSITO PARAGRAFO "PERSONALITY" : http://www.classiccat.net/shostakovich_d/biography.php SCHEMA MOLTO SINTETICO DELLA BIOGRAFIA: http://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/dmitry-shostakovich-344.php La mia droga si chiama Caterina La mia droga si chiama Caterina “Io mi aggiro tra gli uomini come fossero frammenti di uomini” (Nietzsche) In un articolo del 1932 sulla rivista “Sovetskoe iskusstvo”, Sostakovic dichiarava il proprio amore per Katerina Lvovna Izmajlova, la protagonista dell’opera che egli stava scrivendo da oltre venti mesi, e che vedrà la luce al Teatro Malyi di Leningrado il 22 gennaio 1934. Katerina è una ragazza russa della stessa età del compositore, ventiquattro, venticinque anni (la maturazione artistica di Sostakovic fu, com’è noto, precocissima), “dotata, intelligente e superiore alla media, la quale rovina la propria vita a causa dell’opprimente posizione cui la Russia prerivoluzionaria la assoggetta”. E’ un’omicida, anzi un vero e proprio serial killer al femminile; e tuttavia Sostakovic denuncia quanta simpatia provi per lei. Nelle originarie intenzioni dell’autore, “Una Lady Macbeth del distretto di Mcensk” avrebbe inaugurato una trilogia dedicata alla donna russa, còlta nella sua essenza immutabile attraverso differenti epoche storiche.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Late Style of Johannes Brahms: a Study of the Late Songs
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Defining the Late Style of Johannes Brahms: A Study of the Late Songs Natilan Casey-Ann Crutcher [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Musicology Commons Recommended Citation Crutcher, Natilan Casey-Ann, "Defining the Late Style of Johannes Brahms: A Study of the Late Songs" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3886. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3886 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Defining the Late Style of Johannes Brahms: A Study of the Late Songs Natilan Crutcher Dissertation submitted to the College of Creative Arts at West Virginia University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts In Voice Performance Hope Koehler, DMA, Chair Evan MacCarthy, Ph.D. William Koehler, DMA David Taddie, Ph.D. General Hambrick, BFA School of Music Morgantown, West Virginia 2019 Keywords: Johannes Brahms, Lieder, Late Style Copyright 2019 Natilan Crutcher Abstract Defining the Late Style of Johannes Brahms: A Study of the Late Songs Natilan Crutcher Johannes Brahms has long been viewed as a central figure in the Classical tradition during a period when the standards of this tradition were being altered and abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Provides an Overview of the Most Frequently Performed Composers and Works, and of U.S., Canadian, and Contemporary Composers and Works
    The data below was compiled from the 2012-13 classical season repertoire submitted by 57 League of American Orchestras member orchestras. This summary provides an overview of the most frequently performed composers and works, and of U.S., Canadian, and contemporary composers and works. DATA SET TOTAL DATA COLLECTED FOR THE STATISTICS THAT FOLLOW 893 Concert performances 2929 Performances of individual works 57 Orchestras 933 Distinct compositions 301 Different composers Most frequently performed composers Scheduled Performances Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart 230 Ludwig van Beethoven 198 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky 162 Johannes Brahms 145 Felix Mendelssohn 76 Franz Schubert 63 Maurice Ravel 62 Igor Stravinsky 58 Richard Wagner 55 Sergei Rachmaninoff 55 Aaron Copland 52 Franz Joseph Haydn 52 Antonin Dvorak 51 Richard Strauss 50 Claude Debussy 49 Jean Sibelius 49 Dmitri Shostakovich 42 Modest Mussorgsky 42 Johann Sebastian Bach 40 George Frederic Handel 39 Robert Schumann 38 Leonard Bernstein 35 Gustav Mahler 34 Sergei Prokofiev 33 George Gershwin 30 2 Most frequently performed works Scheduled Performances Modest Mussorgsky Pictures at an Exhibition 23 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto in D major, Opus 35 23 Johannes Brahms Symphony No. 4 in E minor, Opus 98 20 Igor Stravinsky The Rite of Spring 20 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Opus 23 19 Igor Stravinsky The Firebird (all versions) 18 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky Symphony No. 4 in F minor, Opus 36 18 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Symphony No. 40 in G minor, K. 550 17 Franz Schubert Symphony No. 8 in B minor, D. 759 "Unfinished" 17 Ludwig van Beethoven Symphony No.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Piano Concerto of Johannes Brahms: Its History and Performance Practice
    THE FIRST PIANO CONCERTO OF JOHANNES BRAHMS: ITS HISTORY AND PERFORMANCE PRACTICE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS by Mark Livshits Diploma Date August 2017 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Joyce Lindorff, Advisory Chair, Keyboard Studies Dr. Charles Abramovic, Keyboard Studies Dr. Michael Klein, Music Studies Dr. Maurice Wright, External Member, Temple University, Music Studies ABSTRACT In recent years, Brahms’s music has begun to occupy a larger role in the consciousness of musicologists, and with this surge of interest came a refreshingly original approach to his music. Although the First Piano Concerto op. 15 of Johannes Brahms is a beloved part of the standard piano repertoire, there is a curious under- representation of the work through the lens of historical performance practice. This monograph addresses the various aspects that comprise a thorough performance practice analysis of the concerto. These include pedaling, articulation, phrasing, and questions of tempo, an element that takes on greater importance beyond just complicating matters technically. These elements are then put into the context of Brahms’s own pianism, conducting, teaching, and musicological endeavors based on first and second-hand accounts of the composer’s work. It is the combining of these concepts that serves to illuminate the concerto in a far more detailed fashion, and ultimately enabling us to re-evaluate whether the time honored modern interpretations of the work fall within the boundaries that Brahms himself would have considered effective and accurate. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to my committee and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Johannes Brahms Serenade No. 2 in a Major, Op. 16
    PROGRAM NOTES by Phillip Huscher Johannes Brahms Born May 7, 1833, Hamburg, Germany. Died April 3, 1897, Vienna, Austria. Serenade No. 2 in A Major, Op. 16 Brahms composed his A major serenade in 1858–59 and conducted the first performance on February 10, 1860, in Hamburg. The score calls for two flutes and piccolo, two oboes, two clarinets, two bassoons, two horns, violas, cellos, and basses. Performance time is approximately thirty-two minutes. The Chicago Symphony Orchestra’s first subscription concert performances of Brahms’s Second Serenade were given at the Auditorium Theatre on January 15 and 16, 1897, with Theodore Thomas conducting. Today Brahms’s two genial serenades are often thought of as mere studies for his celebrated symphonies—as a way of warming up for the serious business of following in Beethoven’s footsteps and tackling the greatest of classical forms. (―After Haydn,‖ Brahms once said, ―writing a symphony was no longer a joke but a matter of life and death.‖) The serenades clearly are the work of a young man who was gaining experience writing for an orchestra and learning about large-scale form. And they are the obvious link between the earliest stage of Brahms’s career, when the slim and beardless composer wrote little but piano music, and the full maturity of the commanding, grandfatherly figure whose symphonies and concertos were the talk of Vienna. But Brahms’s serenades are also his response to the great tradition of Mozart serenades and divertimentos, and like Beethoven’s septet and Schubert’s octet, they are small-boned masterpieces in their own right.
    [Show full text]