Sheffield Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sheffield Overview Clouds over Sheffield © Paul Richards Sheffield Overview “The setting of Sheffield in its ‘golden frame’, with its hills and valleys and the heritage of trees and parks, continues to be a major asset that is appreciated by residents and visitors alike. The natural environment with its variety of wildlife is valuable in its own right but can also contribute to the economic and social vitality of the city. The green spaces within the built- up areas make an important contribution to the life of the city. The challenge is to protect and enhance the city’s natural assets both to support the regeneration of the city and as features of value in their own right.” Challenge 13: A city that prizes its green environment Adopted Sheffield Local Plan/Sheffield Development Framework, Core Strategy Sheffield City Council, 2009 7 Sheffield in context: landscape and topography For the purpose of this report, the ‘Sheffield district’ is the whole Sheffield region, including areas of the Peak District National Park in Sheffield, and is shown below (Figure 1). Sheffield sits within the south-west corner of South Yorkshire with a third of its area falling within the Peak District National Park boundary (shaded area). The district is defined by the Unitary Authority boundary (Sheffield City Council; SCC) but is divided between two planning authorities: SCC and the Peak District National Park Authority (PDNPA) which covers the western area. Figure 1 (left): the Sheffield district as covered by the report. The green shaded area lies within the Dark Peak region of the Peak District National Park; map credit 3 - see Appendix for credit details Figure 2 (below): National Character Areas (NCAs) within which Sheffield lies. These regions have been based on both geological and ecological assessments as well as the culture and heritage that has helped to shape the landscape; National and Landscape Character Areas map credit 2 The district straddles three National Character Areas: ‘Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Yorkshire Coalfield’, ‘Yorkshire Southern Pennine Fringe’ and part of the ‘Dark Peak’1. At a more local level, SCC undertook a preliminary Landscape Character Assessment of its green belt and countryside areas 2. The assessment has categorised 16 character types further divided into four broad ‘Character Areas’: ‘Upland’; ‘Valley’; ‘Lowland’ and ‘Highly Maintained’2. On an even more local level, north- west Sheffield (known as the Sheffield Lakeland area, see case study) has recently been categorised into four ‘Landscape Character Types’: ‘Enclosed Gritland Uplands’; ‘Slopes and Valleys with Woodlands’; ‘Moorland, Moorland Slopes & Cloughs’; and ‘Developed’, with detailed descriptions of each 3. 8 View from Ringinglow © Paul Richards Sheffield contains a huge variety of landscapes for a city, ranging from the dense urban centre, through the built- up housing and industrial areas of the city, to its hills, lakes and moorlands 4. The countryside in Sheffield ranges from exposed upland heath and moorland fringes, with deep valleys to the west, to gentler rolling wooded farmlands and former marshland in the eastern lowlands. These landscapes have been shaped by variations in geology and landform as well as the city’s industrial history 5. The latter has resulted in a large urban conurbation centred on the meeting of five rivers: the Don; Sheaf (after which the city is named); Porter; Rivelin, and Loxley. A sixth, the Rother, forms the boundary between Sheffield and Rotherham. The underlying geology and deep cut valleys carved by these watercourses create an east-facing amphitheatre formed by the ‘seven hills’, with a 500m high, western upland backdrop (maximum: High Stones, 550m) sloping down towards the eastern lowlands of around 30m (minimum: Blackburn Meadows, 29m). From every part of Sheffield the hills dominate the skyline; over 12% of the district is above 400m high and over 52% lies above 200m 2. In Sheffield, 94% of all housing land is over 100m and 15% is over 200m (the normal limit for development in the UK is 200m)4. There are strong advantages for wildlife in the way in which these hills and valleys form natural green corridors and help to connect areas of woodland and domestic gardens, reducing urban fragmentation 6. The varied topography and landscape means that, 35% as a city, Sheffield supports a surprisingly wide 4 range of natural habitats and biodiversity , as 30% 29.4% detailed in this report. Sheffield has often been described as the ‘greenest city’ in the UK or in Europe and a study undertaken by A. Middleton 25% 22.0% provided some evidence to support this 6. A wide 20% range of statistics were used to determine levels 17.6% 17.8% of ‘greenness’ by comparing against population size, wooded areas, open country etc. and the 15% study found that Sheffield did perform well when 10.6% compared to other major population centres 6. For 10% more general information about Sheffield and its population, please see the ‘State of Sheffield 2018’ 7 5% report . 2.2% 0% Figure 3 (right) : amount of land at various heights within the Sheffield district. Most land lies between 100-300m. 100-200 100-200 metres Land over over Land 500m 200-300metres 300-400 300-400 metres metres 400-500 Land under100 Land m 9 Sheffield in context: geology The surface geology of the Sheffield area is of Silesian, Upper Carboniferous origin (333-299 million years ago) with some more recent alluvial deposits along the river valleys. Travelling from west to east across the district, the underlying landscape of the Eastern Pennine Anticline consists of the mudstone, shale and coarse sandstone (and minor coal seams) of the Millstone Grit (Namurian) of the Dark Peak, giving way to the more widespread Coal Measures (Westfalian). These also comprise mudstone, shale and sandstone, with rich workable seams of coal. Prominent features of the landscape are the inland cliffs or ‘edges’, the longest of which is Stanage Edge at 6km in length, part of which forms the western boundary of the district and runs south-east into the Derbyshire Peak District. This is formed by the hard sandstone horizon of the Millstone Grit where the softer shales and mudstones have eroded away. The Lower Coal Measures form the fine sandstone edges of Sky Edge in the heart of the city and Wharncliffe at the northern boundary with Barnsley. The variation in the coarseness of these sandstones offered different grades of abrasive gritstone in recent times for many uses including the grinding of high quality knife blades. The major consequence of the coming together of the geological characteristics of the region is the steel industry upon which Sheffield is built. The combination of coal for heat, multiple fast flowing streams running down from the upland watershed for power generation, locally occurring iron ore and the charcoal provided by the many forests provide the perfect combination for the creation of steel. The seat earths, fire-clay and ganister beneath the coal seams also provided ideal materials for furnaces. Stanage Edge 10 © Paul Richards Sheffield in context: climate and the effects of climate change on nature Sheffield’s position in the UK, combined with its varied landscape and topography means that the climate across the district varies considerably from the colder, wetter uplands of the western moorland to the relative warmth of the urban heat island within the city centre. The rain shadow that is cast by the Pennines sees the Sheffield area experiencing drier conditions than Manchester, but topography and valley direction deliver variations in temperature that are dramatically different locally depending on altitude, forestation, exposure and aspect 8. This range has a significant impact on the wildlife that the area can support and the extent to which species can disperse and flourish. The increase in mean temperature and sun hours per day over time is shown in Figure 4 (right) 8,9 . Vegetation growth and the diversity of plant species within the Sheffield region are strongly linked to climate because of how it influences the growing season. According to the Met Office, in 2016 the national growing season had increased by an average of 29 days from pre-1990 figures 10 . Sheffield figures reflect this and since 1989 there has been a marked extension to the growing season of around a month (Figure 5)8,9 . This greater local capacity for growth and flowering times has a significant impact further up the food chain as consumers from insects to birds benefit from this extended feeding season. Consequently, there is a longer Figure 4 (above): annual mean temperature and annual number of sun hours recorded at Weston Park between 1880 and 2010. period for reproduction and dispersal, which Figures are smoothed +/- 7 years 8,9 . may influence the introduction of new species as well as potentially strengthen populations. In recent years long-term changes in climate - such as increased average winter temperatures since around 1989 (Figure 4) - suggest possible effects on overwintering success of species such as dragonflies (see Odonata case study, Waterways & Standing Water chapter)8,9 . Other factors, including increased rainfall and temperature extremes, can be detrimental to some species. Non-native species can sometimes flourish in a changing climate. In some urban Sheffield locations some non-native flowering plants are carefully selected to make use of and extend flowering seasons and provide a stable resource for invertebrates (see next case study). Fig ure 5 (above): length of growing season as a smoothed figure (+/- 7 years) and annual variation from the 1961-1990 mean 8,9 . Wyming Brook 11 © Sarah Sidgwick Case study: Pollinators, flowering seasons and urban meadows Jack Brodie and Sue France, Green Estate The much reported decline in insect pollinators is due to several factors but the single most important is believed to be the greatly reduced number of flowers in the landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Opus Distribution
    OPUS DISTRIBUTION OPUS OPUS DISTRIBUTION OPUS DISTRIBUTION OPUS OPUS DISTRIBUTION WHY CHOOSE OPUS DISTRIBUTION? Opus Distribution is a social enterprise which provides unique distribution opportunities exclusively to independent traders, community groups, arts organisations, charities and local government. We distribute print to over 4,000 locations in Sheffield, North Derbyshire, Manchester, Leeds, Nottingham, Barnsley, Doncaster, Chesterfield and Rotherham. Opus Distribution firmly believes in the values of transparency, dedication and customer service. We do our best to give you the maximum amount of information about your print, from the point that we place it in the public sphere to the point that it is no longer in date and in need of recycling. We consider it an essential part of our service that for work completed in Sheffield and North Derbyshire we are able to recycle a client’s print once it goes out of date. The added benefit of this is that we can estimate how much print has been picked up by the public and in which areas it was best received. This allows you a great deal of feedback on which to base your next print distribution campaign. After completing each distribution run, we send our clients a detailed report of which locations have received their print and in what quantities. This helps you to track your print as time progresses. WHO DO WE SERVE? We work exclusively with local traders, community groups, local government, arts organisations, independent promoters and charities, creating and sustaining strong networks and shared ideologies of independent trading. Opus Distribution, like many other organisations in Britain today, is a firm believer in keeping our local economy strong enough to fulfil the needs of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSULTATION REPORT Overview of Comments Received and Officer Responses
    Transformation and Sustainability SHEFFIELD LOCAL PLAN (formerly Sheffield Development Framework) CONSULTATION REPORT Overview of comments received and officer responses ‘City Policies and Sites and Proposals Map Consultation Draft 2010’ (June – August 2010) ‘Additional Site Allocation Options’ (January – February 2012) Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street SHEFFIELD S1 2SH March 2013 CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 1 2. The Consultations 2 3. Overall Results 5 4. Policy Comments 9 Economic Prosperity and Sustainable Employment 9 Serving the City Region 10 Attractive and Sustainable Neighbourhoods 10 Opportunities and Well-Being for All 13 Transport and Movement 14 Global Environment and Natural Resources 15 Green Environment 16 Character and Heritage 17 Areas that Look Good and Work Well 18 Land Uses in Policy Areas 19 5. Area Designations and Site Allocations Comments 21 Central Community Assembly Area 21 East Community Assembly Area 25 North East Community Assembly Area 30 South West Community Assembly Area 33 South Community Assembly Area 37 South East Community Assembly Area 41 Northern Community Assembly Area 46 Appendix 1a – City Policies and Sites Consultation Draft 2010, Policies 59 Appendix 1b – City Policies and Sites Consultation Draft 2010, Sites 67 Appendix 1c – City Policies and Sites Consultation Draft 2010, Proposals 71 Map Appendix 2 – Additional Site Allocation Options Consultation 2012 75 List of Tables Page Table 1 Total Number of Comments, Consultation Draft 2010 5 Table 2 Number of Comments by Chapter 6 Table 3 Number of Comments on Site Allocation by Community 6 Assembly Area Table 4 Number of Comments on Area Designations by Community 6 Assembly Area Table 5 Total Number of Comments, Additional Site Allocation Options 7 2012 1.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Sheffield 03–16 Executive Summary / 17–42 Living & Working
    State of Sheffield 03–16 Executive Summary / 17–42 Living & Working / 43–62 Growth & Income / 63–82 Attainment & Ambition / 83–104 Health & Wellbeing / 105–115 Looking Forwards 03–16 Executive Summary 17–42 Living & Working 21 Population Growth 24 People & Places 32 Sheffield at Work 36 Working in the Sheffield City Region 43–62 Growth & Income 51 Jobs in Sheffield 56 Income Poverty in Sheffield 63–82 Attainment & Ambition 65 Early Years & Attainment 67 School Population 70 School Attainment 75 Young People & Their Ambitions 83–104 Health & Wellbeing 84 Life Expectancy 87 Health Deprivation 88 Health Inequalities 1 9 Premature Preventable Mortality 5 9 Obesity 6 9 Mental & Emotional Health 100 Fuel Poverty 105–115 Looking Forwards 106 A Growing, Cosmopolitan City 0 11 Strong and Inclusive Economic Growth 111 Fair, Cohesive & Just 113 The Environment 114 Leadership, Governance & Reform 3 – Summary ecutive Ex State of Sheffield State Executive Summary Executive 4 The State of Sheffield 2016 report provides an Previous Page overview of the city, bringing together a detailed Photography by: analysis of economic and social developments Amy Smith alongside some personal reflections from members Sheffield City College of Sheffield Executive Board to tell the story of Sheffield in 2016. Given that this is the fifth State of Sheffield report it takes a look back over the past five years to identify key trends and developments, and in the final section it begins to explore some of the critical issues potentially impacting the city over the next five years. As explored in the previous reports, Sheffield differs from many major cities such as Manchester or Birmingham, in that it is not part of a larger conurbation or metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Birley/Beighton/Broomhill and Sharrow Vale
    State of Sheffield Sheffield of State State of Sheffield2018 —Sheffield City Partnership Board Beauchief and Greenhill/ 2018 Birley/Beighton/Broomhill and Sharrow Vale/Burngreave/ City/Crookes and Crosspool/ Darnall/Dore and Totley /East Ecclesfield/Firth Park/ Ecclesall/Fulwood/ Gleadless Valley/Graves Park/ Sheffield City Partnership Board Hillsborough/Manor Castle/ Mosborough/ Nether Edge and Sharrow/ Park and Arbourthorne/ Richmond/Shiregreen and Brightside/Southey/ Stannington/Stocksbridge and Upper Don/Walkley/ West Ecclesfield/Woodhouse State of Sheffield2018 —Sheffield City Partnership Board 03 Foreword Chapter 03 04 (#05–06) —Safety & Security (#49–64) Sheffield: Becoming an inclusive Chapter 04 Contents Contents & sustainable city —Social & Community (#07–08) Infrastructure (#65–78) Introduction (#09–12) Chapter 05 —Health & Wellbeing: Chapter 01 An economic perspective —Inclusive & (#79–90) Sustainable Economy (#13–28) Chapter 06 —Looking Forwards: Chapter 02 State of Sheffield 2018 The sustainability & —Involvement & inclusivity challenge Participation (#91–100) 2018 State of Sheffield (#29–48) 05 The Partnership Board have drawn down on both national 06 Foreword and international evidence, the engagement of those organisations and institutions who have the capacity to make a difference, and the role of both private and social enterprise. A very warm welcome to both new readers and to all those who have previously read the State of Sheffield report which From encouraging the further development of the ‘smart city’, is now entering
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009
    6088 Core Strategy Cover:A4 Cover & Back Spread 6/3/09 16:04 Page 1 Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted March 2009 Sheffield Core Strategy Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted by the City Council on 4th March 2009 Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield City Council Sheffield Core Strategy Core Strategy Availability of this document This document is available on the Council’s website at www.sheffield.gov.uk/sdf If you would like a copy of this document in large print, audio format ,Braille, on computer disk, or in a language other than English,please contact us for this to be arranged: l telephone (0114) 205 3075, or l e-mail [email protected], or l write to: SDF Team Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street Sheffield S1 2SH Sheffield Core Strategy INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction to the Core Strategy 1 What is the Sheffield Development Framework about? 1 What is the Core Strategy? 1 PART 1: CONTEXT, VISION, OBJECTIVES AND SPATIAL STRATEGY Chapter 2 Context and Challenges 5 Sheffield: the story so far 5 Challenges for the Future 6 Other Strategies 9 Chapter 3 Vision and Objectives 13 The Spatial Vision 13 SDF Objectives 14 Chapter 4 Spatial Strategy 23 Introduction 23 Spatial Strategy 23 Overall Settlement Pattern 24 The City Centre 24 The Lower and Upper Don Valley 25 Other Employment Areas in the Main Urban Area 26 Housing Areas 26 Outer Areas 27 Green Corridors and Countryside 27 Transport Routes 28 PART
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Plan Will Allocate Land to Meet the Needs of Our Growing Sites That Already Have Planning for Different Uses, and There Are a Population
    3. Spatial options We estimate that there is already capacity for around 20,000 new Introduction to the Spatial homes in the existing urban area Options Sheffield needs over 40,000 new outside the City Centre. This homes between now and 2038 includes 6,400 homes on large The Sheffield Plan will allocate land to meet the needs of our growing sites that already have planning for different uses, and there are a population. We explain on page 25 permission, as well as an estimated lot of different land uses to consider. how the housing need figure has 5,000 new homes on small sites However, housing takes up far more been calculated. and ‘windfall sites’. In the urban land than any other type of use so the area, homes will be developed at main focus of the spatial options is on a variety of different densities – where new homes should be built. But higher densities nearer to District we also look at how the distribution of Centres and high frequency public homes will impact on the need for, and In this section we outline three options transport routes, and lower in more availability of, land for other uses, as (A, B and C) that set out different suburban areas. There are also well as the implications for travel. ways of accommodating the 40,000 areas, such as Attercliffe, which homes that are needed in the city by We expect new offices, industry and we expect will transition to housing 2038. As we have already noted in the shops to be built in areas where over the plan period, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo by Juan Sisinni on Unsplash. OPUS DISTRIBUTION
    Photo by Juan Sisinni on Unsplash. OPUS DISTRIBUTION OPUS Opus Distribution provides unique distribution opportunities exclusively to independent traders, community groups, arts organisations, charities and local government. We distribute print to over 4,000 locations in Sheffield, North Derbyshire, Manchester, Leeds, Nottingham, Mansfield, Barnsley, Doncaster, Chesterfield, Rotherham, Huddersfield & Kirkless and Wakefield. Opus Distribution firmly believes in the values of transparency, dedication and customer service. We do our best to give you the maximum amount of information about your print, from the point that we place it in the public sphere to the point that it is no longer in date and in need of recycling. We consider it an essential part of our service that for work completed in Sheffield and North Derbyshire we are able to recycle a client’s print once it goes out of date. The added benefit of this is that we can estimate how much print has been picked up by the public and in which areas it was best received. This allows you a great deal of feedback on which to base your next print distribution campaign. After completing each distribution run, we send our clients a detailed report of which locations have received their print and in what quantities. This helps you to track your print as time progresses. Who do we serve? SHEFFIELD CITY HALL We work exclusively with local traders, community groups, local government, arts organisations, Opus Independents are independent promoters and charities, creating and integral to the distribution sustaining strong networks and shared ideologies of of our print in and around independent trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield's Language Education Policies
    Rev 28.11.08 Council of Europe CITY REPORT Sheffield’s Language Education Policies Cllr M. Reynolds January 2008 Final pre visit report 28.11.08 Council of Europe City Report: Sheffield’s Language Education Policies CONTENTS Section 1 Factual Description of Sheffield Page 1.1 Sheffield- general overview 6 1.2 Sheffield’s economy 8 1.3 Sheffield – ethnic composition and diversity 10 1.4 Sheffield – political and socio-economic structures 13 1.4.1 Political structures and composition 13 1.4.2 Social division 15 1.4.3 ‘Sheffield First’ 17 1.4.4 ‘Creative Sheffield’ 17 1.4.5 Sheffield Chamber of Commerce and Industry 18 1.5 Sheffield – home languages spoken by children 19 1.6 Policies and responsibilities for Language Teaching 21 1.6.1 Preface 21 1.6.2 Responsibilities for education 21 1.6.3 The education system in England 22 1.6.4 Types of school in England 23 1.6.4.1 Maintained 23 1.6.4.2 Other types of school 25 1.6.5 Current curriculum debates 26 1.6.6 Language education policy: the National Languages Strategy (2002) 27 1.6.7 Policy implementation 28 1.6.8 Higher education networks 29 1.6.9 Innovations in approaches to language education 30 1.7 Education in Sheffield 32 1.7.1 Children and Young People’s Directorate 32 1.7.2 Sheffield’s schools 34 1.7.3 ‘Transforming Learning Strategy’ 35 1.8 Teachers 36 1.8.1 Teacher training structures 36 1.8.2 Methodological approaches to language teaching 37 1.8.2.1 Primary 37 1.8.2.2 Secondary (Key Stage 3) 38 1.8.2.3 Secondary (Key Stage 4) 40 1.8.2.4 Beyond 16 40 2 Final pre visit report 28.11.08
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield City Story
    Sheffield City Story CASEreport 103: May 2016 Laura Lane, Ben Grubb and Anne Power Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of figures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of boxes ............................................................................................................................................... 4 About LSE Housing and Communities ....................................................................................................... 5 Foreword and acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 5 Sheffield About .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Geography and History .................................................................................................................. 8 Shock Industrial Collapse ......................................................................................................................... 12 Sheffield shifts towards partnerships ...................................................................................................... 16 Recovery to 2007 ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Community Assembly Area Areas and Sites
    Transformation and Sustainability SHEFFIELD LOCAL PLAN (formerly Sheffield Development Framework) CITY POLICIES AND SITES DOCUMENT CENTRAL COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AREA AREAS AND SITES BACKGROUND REPORT Development Services Sheffield City Council Howden House 1 Union Street SHEFFIELD S1 2SH June 2013 CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 1 Part 1: City Centre 2. Policy Areas in the City Centre 5 3. Allocated Sites in the City Centre 65 Part 2: Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 4. Policy Areas in Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 133 5. Allocated Sites in Sheaf Valley and Neighbouring Areas 175 Part 3: South and West Urban Area 6. Policy Areas in the South and West Urban Area 177 7. Allocated Sites in the South and West Urban Area 227 Part 4: Upper Don Valley 8. Policy Areas 239 9. Allocated Sites in Upper Don Valley 273 List of Tables Page 1 Policy Background Reports 3 2 Potential Capacity of Retail Warehouse Allocations 108 List of Figures Page 1 Consolidated Central and Primary Shopping Areas 8 2 Illustrative Block Plan for The Moor 9 3 Current Street Level Uses in the Cultural Hub 15 4 Priority Office Areas 21 5 City Centre Business Areas 28 6 City Centre Neighbourhoods 46 7 City Centre Open Space 57 8 Bramall Lane/ John Street 139 1. INTRODUCTION The Context 1.1 This report provides evidence to support the published policies for the City Policies and Sites document of the Sheffield Local Plan. 1.2 The Sheffield Local Plan is the new name, as used by the Government, for what was known as the Sheffield Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the S20 Wildlife Corridor – Summary Paper an Alternative Proposal for Owlthorpe Fields: Towards a Heathier South East Sheffield
    Introducing the S20 Wildlife Corridor – Summary Paper An alternative proposal for Owlthorpe fields: Towards a heathier South East Sheffield Owlthorpe Fields Action Group & Dr Patrick Harrison (Department of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Hull) Summary This document presents a summary of the vision for a wildlife corridor in South East Sheffield for the health and wellbeing of the communities in the Beighton, Mosborough and Birley wards by joining up local wildlife sites and, importantly, incorporating Owlthorpe Fields which has been rewilding for 20+ years. Aims and Outcomes The aim of the S20 wildlife corridor is to link up and enhance sites of ecological interest forming a 2-mile long wildlife corridor within the Beighton & Mosborough wards of South East Sheffield. We believe the incorporation of Owlthorpe Fields (including the existing Local Wildlife Sites) into the wildlife corridor and linking it to Westfield Plantation, Waterthorpe Park, Waterthorpe Meadows and Beighton Ponds (Fig. 1), is a far more positive vision than the destruction of this ecologically rich, rewilded location for housing, especially considering the area already has substantial housing with its associated congestion. By taking an interdisciplinary approach and linking ecology, community health and school attainment together, we believe we can have a positive impact on the lives of local people. The wildlife corridor has four aims: 1. To become a space for the benefit of the local community, on their doorstep, where people can engage with nature and which can provide relaxation and exercise to benefit both physical and mental health; 2. At the local level, enhance and link several wildlife habitats such as meadows and wetlands to increase the biodiversity of flora and fauna in the area; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Christ Church Dore A
    Role Description Details of Post Role Title: Oversight Minister in the Abbeydale, Dore, Totley & Millhouses Mission Area and Priest in Charge of Christ Church Dore Name of Benefices: Christ Church Dore (Principal responsibility) All Saints Totley Abbeydale & Millhouses (St John Abbeydale and Holy Trinity Millhouses) Deanery: Ecclesall Archdeaconry: Sheffield and Rotherham Context The role of Oversight Minister is to work in partnership with the Bishop, fellow Clergy and Lay Leaders, and all the baptised members of the diocese of Sheffield, to help realise the Diocesan strategy to be a flourishing and generous Diocese of Sheffield by 2025: Renewed, Released and Rejuvenated! We seek to be a Diocese Renewed in the grace and power of God, by a constant reliance on the Holy Spirit. We seek to be a Diocese Released from the constraints which hold us back from mission, and released, as the whole people of God for the whole mission of God. We seek to be a Diocese Rejuvenated — partly through a dedicated and sustained programme of outreach to families, children and young people, and partly through the creation of 75 new congregations, including 25 in our church schools. The Parish of Dore is set within an active Mission Area which also includes the parishes of All Saints Totley and Abbeydale & Millhouses (St John the Evangelist & Holy Trinity). This mission area is served by two stipendiary clergy, who share in the oversight of the whole mission area with specific principal responsibilities. Whilst the previous incumbent of Dore was also Priest in Charge of All Saints Totley, the bishop is currently in advanced discussions that should lead to an additional stipendiary oversight minister appointment in the mission area with principal responsibility for Totley.
    [Show full text]