1

Regular Meeting of Council Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:00 p.m.

Morinville Community Cultural Centre

Presenter Page(s) 1.0 Call to Order Mayor B. Turner

2.0 Adoption of Agenda Mayor B. Turner

2.1 Additional Items

3.0 Adoption of Minutes Mayor B. Turner 4-10

3.1 September 8, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve September 8, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council minutes.

3.2 September 15, 2020, Committee of the Whole

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the September 15, 2020, Committee of the Whole minutes.

4.0 Protocol Items Mayor B. Turner

5.0 Presentations

5.1 Public Presentations Mayor B. Turner

6.0 Public Hearing

6.1 Bylaw 17/2020, Land Use Bylaw Amendment Mayor B. Turner 11-12

7.0 Business

7.1 Bylaw

7.1.1 Bylaw 17/2020 – Land Use Bylaw Amendment T. McNab 13-38 For 2nd & 3rd Reading

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve 2nd and 3rd Reading of proposed Bylaw 17/2020, a bylaw to amend Land Use Bylaw 3/2012. Regular Meeting of Council 2 Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Agenda Page 2

7.1.2 Bylaw 18/2020 – Face Covering Bylaw I. Bushell 39-45 For 1st, 2nd and Potential 3rd Reading

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve 1st and 2nd Readings, and consider 3rd Reading of proposed Bylaw 18/2020, a bylaw to temporarily mandate the wearing of face coverings in indoor public spaces and public vehicles.

7.2 New Business

7.2.1 Municipal Stimulus Program S. Labonne 46-115

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the list of capital projects eligible for funding through the Government of ’s Municipal Stimulus Program and direct Administration to submit funding applications by October 1, 2020.

7.2.2 2020 Municipal Census Report M. Steele 116-127

RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the 2020 Municipal Census Report as information.

7.2.3 Motions Pending B. Turner 128

RECOMMENDATION: That Council consider the Motions Pending from the September 8, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council and the September 15, 2020, Committee of the Whole meeting.

7.3 Policies

7.3.1 Commemorative Naming Policy D. Craib 129-148

RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Commemorative Naming Policy as presented.

8.0 Council Correspondence Mayor B. Turner 149-153

8.1 Letter – Together We Stand re. Military Family Appreciation Day 8.2 Letter – Alberta Treasury Board and Finance re. International Airport

9.0 Notices of Motion Mayor B. Turner

10.0 Closed Session As per Section 197(2) of the Municipal Government Act Division 2 of Part 1 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Ch. F.25

Regular Meeting of Council 3 Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Agenda Page 3

10.1 CAO Dialogue S. Labonne FOIP s. 24 (Advice from Officials) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Ch. F.25

10.2 Council Dialogue Mayor B. Turner FOIP s. 24 (Advice from Officials) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Ch. F.25

10.3 Collective Bargaining Mandate S. Labonne FOIP s. 23 (Local public body confidences), s. 24 (Advice from officials), and s. 25 (Disclosure harmful to economic and other interests of a public body) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Ch. F.25

11.0 Adjournment 4

Regular Meeting of Council Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Morinville Community Cultural Centre

Present: Mayor B. Turner Deputy Mayor S. Hall Councillor R. Balanko Councillor N. Boutestein Councillor S. Dafoe Councillor L. Giffin Councillor S. Richardson

Staff: S. Labonne, CAO S. Jason, Director, Corporate Services I. Bushell, General Manager of Community and Infrastructure Services B. White, Director, Planning & Economic Development T. McNab, Development Planner T. Dalzell-Heise, Senior Strategist, Communications and Marketing L. Koyota, Venue Technician L. Denchant, LOUDCO-HD (Live Video Feed) M. Steele, Legislative Officer

1.0 Call to Order

Mayor B. Turner called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

2.0 Adoption of Agenda

2.1. Additional Items 289/2020 Councillor R. Balanko moved to approve the agenda presented.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

3.0 Adoption of Minutes

3.1. August 25, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council 290/2020 Councillor N. Boutestein moved to approve the August 25, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council minutes, as amended.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

4.0 Protocol Items

Council highlighted the September Proclamations, the Medal of Bravery award for Morinville resident Amber Dyck, and announced the completion of the Census 2020 project, with the new population count of 10,578 residents.

______Mayor Legislative Officer Regular Meeting of Council 5 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Minutes Page 2

5.0 Presentations

5.1. Public Presentations - Nil

6.0 Business

6.1. Bylaw

6.1.1. Bylaw 17/2020 – Land Use Bylaw Amendment 291/2020 Councillor L. Giffin moved that Council approve 1st Reading of proposed Bylaw 17/2020, a bylaw to amend Morinville Land Use Bylaw 3/2012.

For: 5 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin Against: 2 – N. Boutestein, S. Richardson Carried

6.2. New Business

6.2.1. COVID-19 Tax and Utility Deferral Program Update 292/2020 Councillor S. Dafoe moved that Council accept the COVID-19 Property Tax and Utility Referral Program Update report as information.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

6.2.2. 2020 AUMA Resolutions – Administrative Recommendations 293/2020 Councillor N. Boutestein moved that Council accept the 2020 AUMA Resolutions – Administrative Recommendations Report as information.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

6.2.3. Town of Morinville Emergent Resolution – 2020 AUMA Annual Convention 294/2020 Deputy Mayor S. Hall moved that Council endorse the “DRAFT” Town of Morinville Emergent AUMA Resolution titled “Provincial Guideline for Mandatory Face Coverings.”

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

295/2020 Councillor R. Balanko moved that Mayor Turner be directed to share the “DRAFT” resolution with neighbouring municipalities to seek a seconder prior to the 2020 AUMA Convention.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

7.0 Council Correspondence 296/2020 Councillor S. Dafoe moved that Council accept the correspondence as information.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

______Mayor Legislative Officer Regular Meeting of Council 6 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Minutes Page 3

8.0 Notices of Motion

8.1. Mayor B. Turner provided notice of the intention to bring forward the following motion to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council:

“That Council direct Mayor Turner to extend an invitation to the Alexander Chief and Council to attend a joint event to begin the process of collaboratively building a relationship for the mutual-benefit of both communities.”

Mayor B. Turner recessed the meeting at 4:41 p.m.

Mayor B. Turner called the meeting back to order at 4:54 p.m.

9.0 Closed Session In accordance with Section 24 of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Act, RSA 2000, CH. F.25 297/2020 Councillor R. Balanko moved that Council proceed to a Closed Session at 4:54 p.m. to discuss items 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4, as per Sections 16, 23, 24, 25, and 29 of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Act, RSA 2000, CH. F. 25. For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

9.1. Proposed Land Sale FOIP s. 16 (Disclosure harmful to business interests of a third party), s. 23 (Local public body confidences), s. 24 (Advice from officials), s. 25 (Disclosure harmful to economic and other interests of a public body) and s. 29 (Information that is or will be available to the public)

9.2. Regional Economic Development Update FOIP s. 16 (Disclosure harmful to business interests of a third party), s. 23 (Local public body confidences), s. 24 (Advice from officials), and s. 25 (Disclosure harmful to economic and other interests of a public body)

9.3. CAO Dialogue FOIP s. 24 (Advice from Officials)

9.4. Council Dialogue FOIP s. 24 (Advice from Officials)

The following members of Administration were present for the Closed Session items 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 to provide information and/or administrative assistance: Stephane Labonne, CAO; Iain Bushell, General Manager of Community and Infrastructure Services; Shawna Jason, Director, Corporate Services; Brad White, Director, Planning & Economic Development; Tracy Dalzell-Heise, Senior Strategist, Communications and Marketing; Melodie Steele, Legislative Officer.

299/2020 Deputy Mayor S. Hall moved that Council move out of Closed Session at 6:38 p.m.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

______Mayor Legislative Officer Regular Meeting of Council 7 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Minutes Page 4

9.1 Proposed Land Sale 300/2020 Councillor L. Giffin moved that Council direct the CAO to negotiate a sale agreement for lands located at Block 992-2042, Lot 7 at market value, subject to the terms outlined in the Proposed Land Sale Report.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

301/2020 Councillor N. Boutestein moved that the Proposed Land Sale report and attachments remain private pursuant to s. 16 (Disclosure harmful to business interests of a third party), s. 23 (Local public body confidences), s. 24 (Advice from officials), s. 25 (Disclosure harmful to economic and other interests of a public body) and s. 29 (Information that is or will be available to the public) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Chapter F-25.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

9.2 Regional Economic Development Update 302/2020 Councillor R. Balanko moved that Council direct Mayor Turner to support Option C, the 2020 Additional Funding Top Up for Edmonton Global, for $17,701.95 on a one-time basis. Funding for this initiative to come from the former Visitor Information Centre.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

303/2020 Deputy Mayor S. Hall moved that the Regional Economic Development Update report remains private pursuant to s. 16 (Disclosure harmful to business interests of a third party), s. 23 (Local public body confidences), s. 24 (Advice from officials), and s. 25 (Disclosure harmful to economic and other interests of a public body) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000, Chapter F-25.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

10.0 Adjournment

Councillor S. Dafoe moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:44 p.m.

Approved by Council TOWN OF MORINVILLE

This 22nd day of September, 2020

Barry Turner Mayor

Melodie Steele Legislative Officer

8

Committee of the Whole Tuesday September 15, 2020 – 4:00 pm

Morinville Community Cultural Centre

Present: Mayor B. Turner Deputy Mayor S. Hall Councillor R. Balanko Councillor N. Boutestein Councillor S. Dafoe Councillor L. Giffin Councillor S. Richardson

Staff: S. Labonne, CAO S. Jason, Director, Corporate Services I. Bushell, General Manager, Community and Infrastructure Services B. White, Director, Planning & Economic Development D. Craib, Permit and Licencing Officer T. Dalzell-Heise, Senior Strategist, Communications and Marketing L. Koyota, Venue Technician L. Denchant, LOUDCO-HD (Live Video Feed) M. Steele, Legislative Officer

1.0 Call to Order

Deputy Mayor S. Hall called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m.

2.0 Adoption of Agenda

2.1. Additional Items

Councillor S. Dafoe moved to accept the agenda as presented.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried Unanimously

3.0 Protocol Items

Council congratulated the Morinville Senior Leadership Team for receiving the 2020 Dedicated Senior Team Award from the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association, and recognized area teachers and schools for their work to re-open schools during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

4.0 Presentations

4.1. Alberta Union of Provincial Employees

Ms. Samantha Samborski and Mr. Trevor Zimmerman and presented on the impacts to Morinville residents of the possible closure of provincially run homes for Albertans with developmental disabilities.

Councillor N. Boutestein moved that Council refer the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees verbal presentation to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration. For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried Unanimously

______Deputy Legislative Mayor Officer

Committee of the Whole 9 Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Minutes Page 2

4.2. Public Presentations

Ms. Loralee Elliott presented a request for in-kind services to support a Remembrance Day Banner project for banner placement along 100 Street.

5.0 Business – General

5.1. General

5.1.1. Community Grant Applications – Fourth Intake 2020

Councillor S. Dafoe moved to accept the Community Grant Applications – Fourth Intake report as information.

For: 7 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin, S. Richardson Carried

5.2. Bylaws

5.2.1. Face Covering Bylaw 18/2020

Councillor S. Richardson exited the meeting room at 5:27 p.m.

Councillor N. Boutestein moved that Council refer Bylaw 18/2020 to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration.

For: 6 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin Carried

5.3. Policies

5.3.1. Commemorative Naming Policy

Councillor S. Dafoe moved that Council refer the Commemorative Naming Policy to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration.

For: 6 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin Carried

5.3.2. Snow and Ice Control Administrative Policy

Councillor L. Giffin moved that Council receive the Snow and Ice Control Policy PWA1/2020 for information.

For: 6 – B. Turner, R. Balanko, N. Boutestein, S. Dafoe, S. Hall, L. Giffin Carried

6.0 Council Boards / Committees / Commission Reports / Council Commitments

Council provided updates on the Boards and Committees on which they represent the Town of Morinville.

______Deputy Legislative Mayor Officer

Committee of the Whole 10 Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Minutes Page 3

7.0 Action Tracking List

M. Steele presented the Action Tracking List for Council’s review.

8.0 Adjournment

Councillor S. Dafoe moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:05 p.m.

Approved by Council TOWN OF MORINVILLE

This 22nd day of September, 2020

Sarah Hall Deputy Mayor

Melodie Steele Legislative Officer

11

Public Hearing - Agenda September 22, 2020 – 4:00 pm

Morinville Community Cultural Centre

Morinville Land Use Bylaw Amendment Bylaw 17/2020

Mayor B. Turner declares the Public Hearing Open at 4:00 pm.

A Public Hearing was duly advertised to begin at 4:00 pm for Bylaw 17/2020, Morinville Land Use Bylaw Amendment.

1. Administration announces the reason for the Public Hearing.

2. Presentation from the Applicant.

3. Review correspondence in relation to proposed Bylaws.

4. Any person wishing to make representation may do so. (When speaking please state your name.)

5. Summary is given at this time from the Applicant. (The Applicant can respond to specific concerns but cannot bring forth new information.)

6. Administration summarizes.

7. Mayor B. Turner declares the Public Hearing closed.

8. The Council, after considering the representations made to it and any other matter it considers appropriate; refer it to the Regular Meeting of Council for action.

Council can ask questions at any time during the process.

Readings of bylaws must take place at a Regular Meeting of Council and cannot be done at the Public Hearing. 12 Western Living Homes Ltd 9877 – 62 Avenue NW Edmonton, Alberta

T6E 0E4 Ph: (780) 436-5344 Fx: (780) 436-5711

August 31, 2020

Town of Morinville 10125 100 Avenue Morinville, AB T8R 1L6

To Whom it May Concern;

We understand that TAG Developments has made an application to allow secondary suites in townhome units within the Grandin Heights & Notre Dame Site Specific Residential (DC-3) District along 96 avenue and East Boundary Road, Morinville Alberta, and we have no objection to the application.

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns.

Thank You,

Christine DeRose

Western Living Homes Ltd. 9877 62 Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T6E 0E4 (780) 436 5344 13

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC Bylaw 17/2020 – Morinville Land Use Bylaw Amendment September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Tyler McNab, Development Planner ATTACHMENTS: • Bylaw 17/2020 – Amendments to Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 PREPARED BY: Tyler McNab, Development Planner • Bylaw 17/2020 – Redline Changes to Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 • 20-R0008 – Application • Bylaw 17/2020 - Presentation

CLEARANCES: Brad White, Acting CAO RELEVANT POLICIES/BYLAWS: • Municipal Government Act (MGA) • Municipal Development Plan (MDP) • Grandin Heights Area Structure Plan (ASP)

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council approve 2nd and 3rd Reading of proposed Bylaw 17/2020, a bylaw to amend Land Use Bylaw 3/2012.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the September 8th, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved 1st reading of Bylaw 17/2020, a bylaw to amend Land Use Bylaw 3/2012.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY:

The purpose of Bylaw 17/2020 is to allow secondary suites within Ground Oriented Multiple Unit Dwellings within the Grandin Heights & Notre Dame Site Specific (DC-3-9) District. This new and developing neighbourhood will see new residential lots designated for Ground Oriented Multiple Unit dwellings and Single-Detached homes.

If approved, the proposed bylaw will allow secondary suites in the DC-3-9 district and would be required to meet the Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 regulations within the Direct Control District 8.4.4.11.3, Secondary Suite regulations in section 4.5, and Parking Regulations in Part 6.

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______T. McNab B. White Development Planner Acting Chief Administrative Officer

14

The proposed bylaw amendment is supported by Morinville’s Municipal Development Plan (MDP) and the Grandin Heights Area Structure Plan (ASP).

Municipal Development Plan Policy 8.14 - Morinville shall encourage secondary suites (i.e. basement, garage and garden suites) where appropriate to increase density subtly.

Grandin Heights Area Structure Plan Section 1.4.ii. supports rental unit developments and housing types with secondary suites.

LINKAGE TO BUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Municipal Sustainability Plan: • Governance – Efficient Community Planning 2019-2021 Strategic Goals • Continue pursuing opportunities to increase residential development while maintaining a sense of community • Work with developers and builders to increase growth in residential and non-residential development. Edmonton Metropolitan Regional Growth Plan • Objective 3.2 - Plan for and promote a range of housing options o Policy 3.2.1 - Housing will be planned and developed to address the changing demographics in the Region by including housing that offers a diversity of types, forms and levels of affordability to support a variety of lifestyle options, income levels and to meet the needs of all residents. Municipal Development Plan • Policy 8.14 - Morinville shall encourage secondary suites (i.e. basement, garage and garden suites) where appropriate to subtly increase density. • Policy 8.23 - Morinville shall encourage a diversity of housing types, forms, levels of affordability, and densities in residential areas.

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

Administration to proceed as directed by Council.

15

TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA MORINVILLE LAND USE BYLAW AMENDMENT BYLAW 17/2020

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF MORINVILLE, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO AMEND THE MORINVILLE LAND USE BYLAW.

WHEREAS, Council at its meeting of April 10th, 2012, gave third reading to Morinville Land Use Bylaw No. 3/2012;

AND WHEREAS, Council considers it desirable to amend the text of the Morinville Land Use Bylaw;

AND WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing for this bylaw held on ______has been given in accordance with Section 692 of the Municipal Government Act, 2000 RSA, ch. M-26, as amended;

NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Town of Morinville, Alberta, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows:

1.0 Morinville Land Use Bylaw No. 3/2012, as amended, is hereby amended by:

1.1 Modifying Section 8.4.3.11.2.1 to read: 1.1.1 Permitted Uses Single detached dwelling, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Home occupations – Minor Home offices Public parks Secondary suites Buildings and uses accessory to permitted uses

2.0 The headings and descriptions of Section numbers in this Bylaw are inserted for convenience of reference to the Morinville Land Use Bylaw and in no way whatsoever expand, limit, define or affect this Bylaw.

3.0 That this Bylaw shall come into full force and effect upon the final passing thereof.

4.0 SEVERABILITY

16 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA MORINVILLE LAND USE BYLAW AMENDMENT Bylaw 17/2020 Page 2

4.1 If any Section or parts of this bylaw are found in any court of law to be illegal or beyond the power of Council to enact, such Section or parts shall be deemed to be severable and all other Sections or parts of this bylaw shall be deemed to be separate and independent there from and to be enacted as such.

READ a first time the 8th day of September, 2020

READ a second time the ____ day of ______, 2020

READ a third time and finally passed the ____ day of ______, 2020

______Barry Turner Mayor

______Stephane Labonne Chief Administrative Officer

PART EIGHT – LAND USE DISTRICT PROVISIONS 17 Bylaw 13/2018 11.0 Grandin Heights & Notre Dame Site Specific Residential (DC-3-9) District 11.1. Purpose This residential land use district within the Grandin Heights and Notre Dame Neighbourhoods provides for a mixture of smaller single detached homes and fee-simple ground-oriented multiple dwelling options for Grandin Heights Stage 7 to address market needs. This district is tied directly to the Grandin Heights Stage 7 subdivision plan included as Appendix “A”.

11.2. Permitted and Discretionary Uses 1. Permitted Uses Single detached dwelling, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Home occupations – Minor Home offices Public parks Secondary suites, only accessory to single detached dwellings Buildings and uses accessory to permitted uses

2. Discretionary Uses Bed and breakfast establishments Child day homes Group homes Home occupation - Major Public utilities (no office or workshop) Show homes Buildings and uses accessory to discretionary uses

11.3. Subdivision Regulations

Minimum site width Single detached dwelling Laneless: 9.71 m (32.0 ft.) for internal sites; or 11.52 m (37.8 ft.) for corner sites.

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling With lane: 5.5m (18.1 ft.) for internal sites; or 6.7m (22.0 ft.) for exterior sites; or 8.5m (28.1 ft.) for corner sites.

Pie-shaped sites shall be measured 9.0 m (29.5 ft.) from the front line, and reverse pie-shaped sites shall be measured 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) from the rear line.

Minimum site depth 30.5m (100.0 ft).

Development Regulations

Morinville Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 ` Office Consolidation PART EIGHT – LAND USE DISTRICT PROVISIONS 18

Maximum site coverage Single detached dwelling 50%, where the dwelling is a maximum of 32% and the garage and other accessory buildings shall not exceed 18%.

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit 57%, including attached garage and/ or a detached garage and any other accessory buildings.

Minimum front yard 4.5 m (14.8 ft.) with no front garage; or 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) with a front garage.

1.2 m (3.9 ft.) for internal sites; or 3.05 m (10.0 Minimum side yard ft.) for corner sites.

Minimum rear yard Dwellings with a front attached garage 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) for internal sites; or 4.5 m (14.8 ft.) for corner sites.

Maximum building height Single detached dwelling unit – 10.0 m (32.8 ft.).

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit - 12.6 m (41.3 ft.).

1. Secondary Suites shall be in accordance with Part Four, Section 4.5 Secondary Suites. 2. Dwellings with front attached garages with a width of 7.3 m (24 ft.) shall have a maximum access width of 6.1 m (20 ft.). 3. Dwellings with front attached garages with a width of 7.9 m (26 ft.) shall have a maximum access width of 6.7 m (22 ft.).

Morinville Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 ` Office Consolidation PART EIGHT – LAND USE DISTRICT PROVISIONS 19 APPENDIX “A”

Morinville Land Use Bylaw 3/2012 ` Office Consolidation 20 21 22 23 PART EIGHT – LAND USE DISTRICT PROVISIONS 8.4.3._Grandin Heights & Notre Dame Site Specific Residential (DC-3-_) District

1.0 Purpose

This residential land use district within the Grandin Heights and Notre Dame Neighbourhoods provides for a mixture of smaller single detached homes and fee-simple ground-oriented multiple dwelling options for Grandin Heights Stage 7 to address market needs. This district is tied directly to the Grandin Heights Stage 7 subdivision plan included as Appendix “A”.

2.0 Permitted and Discretionary Uses

2.1. Permitted Uses

Single detached dwelling, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit, only on lots identified in Appendix “A” Home occupations – Minor Home offices Public parks Secondary suites Buildings and uses accessory to permitted uses

2.2. Discretionary Uses – Development Officer

Child day homes Group homes Public utilities (no office or workshop) Show homes Buildings and uses accessory to discretionary uses

2.3. Discretionary Uses – Municipal Planning Commission

Bed and breakfast establishments Home occupation - Major

3.0 Subdivision Regulations

Minimum site width Single detached dwelling

Laneless: 9.71 m (32.0 ft.) for internal sites; or 11.52 m (37.8 ft.) for corner sites.

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling

With lane: 5.5m (18.1 ft.) for internal sites; or 6.7m (22.0 ft.) for exterior sites; or 8.5m (28.1 ft.) for corner sites.

LUB-1-225-18019-8.5-DCDistrict-200824 24 PART EIGHT – LAND USE DISTRICT PROVISIONS

Pie-shaped sites shall be measured 9.0 m (29.5 ft.) from the front line, and reverse pie-shaped sites shall be measured 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) from the rear line.

Minimum site depth 30.5m (100.0 ft). Development Regulations Maximum site coverage Single detached dwelling 50%, where the dwelling is a maximum of 32% and the garage and other accessory buildings shall not exceed 18%.

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit 57%, including attached garage and/ or a detached garage and any other accessory buildings. Minimum front yard 4.5 m (14.8 ft.) with no front garage; or 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) with a front garage. Minimum side yard 1.2 m (3.9 ft.) for internal sites; or 3.05 m (10.0 ft.) for corner sites. Minimum rear yard Dwellings with a front attached garage 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) for internal sites; or 4.5 m (14.8 ft.) for corner sites. Maximum building height Single detached dwelling unit – 10.0 m (32.8 ft.).

Ground-oriented multiple dwelling unit - 12.6 m (41.3 ft.).

3.1. Secondary Suites shall be in accordance with Part Four, Section 4.5 Secondary Suites.

3.2 Dwellings with front attached garages with a width of 7.3 m (24 ft.) shall have a maximum access width of 6.1 m (20 ft.).

3.3 Dwellings with front attached garages with a width of 7.9 m (26 ft.) shall have a maximum access width of 6.7 m (22 ft.).

LUB-1-225-18019-8.5-DCDistrict-200824 25

Grandin Heights Stage 7 Fee Schedule

Redistricting Fees

Redistricting/ Land Use Bylaw Amendment $3,000.00 Advertising Fee $100.00

Total Redistricting Fees $3,100.00

8/24/2020 FEES-225-18019-8.1-GHStg7-200824 26 Planning & Economic Development

Request For Decision

Land Use Bylaw Amendment Bylaw 17/2020 Text amendment to DC-3-9 District www.morinville.ca Recommendation For Council Decision 3/2012 Bylaw Use bylaw Land a Bylaw to amend 17/2020, approve 2 Council That nd 27 and 3 and rd Reading of proposed proposed Reading of www.morinville.ca Previous Action Council • AtSeptember 8 the • Council passed 1 passedCouncil Amendment Amendment - Bylaw 17/2020. st th reading Land of Use Bylaw 2020 28 Regular Meeting of Council Regularof Meeting www.morinville.ca Background Summary • • • Mun proposedThe bylaw amendment is supported by the Site (DC Specific Dwellings the within Grandin Heights & Notre Dame suit Bylaw to of is 17/2020 secondary allow purpose The Morinville residentsrent.who buyers in Morinville as well as more options for mor ApplicantThe indicates that allowchangewill this HeightsAreaStructure Plan. Oriented within es Groundthe Oriented e affordablee housing optionsfor first icipal Development Plan as well as the Grandin -3- 9) District. 29 Multiple Unit Multiple - time home home www.morinville.ca Context Area 30 www.morinville.ca PRIORITIES: LINKAGE TOBUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC 2019- Sustainability Municipal Plan: • Edmonton Metropolitan RegionalGrowth Plan Objective 3.2 • • • • 2021 StrategicGoals needs of allresidents. varietysupport a of lifestyleoptions,income levels to and meet the offers adiversitytypes, forms of levels and of affordabilityto changing demographics in the Region by includinghousing that Governance Policy 3.2.1 Policy 3.2.1 dev Continue pursuing opportunitiesto increase residential and n and Work withdevelopers buildersand to increase growth in residential elopmentmaintaining while of communitya sense on - residential development. - - Pl – Hou an Eff icient Community Planning for promote and a range ofhousing options sing willsing developed and planned be to address the 31 www.morinville.ca PRIORITIES: LINKAGE TOBUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC Municipal Municipal Development Plan (MDP) • • Policy 8.14 – densities in residential densities areas. affordability,forms,levelsof types, housing and Policy 8.23 – appropriate subtlyto increase density. suites (i.e. basement,garage and garden suites) where Mor Mor inville encourage shall diversity a of inville encourage shall secondary 32 www.morinville.ca Parking fromQuestions 1 • • having a paved width of 6.75m wide. having wide. 6.75m paveda of width route Collector Major for a street on as designed parking Within the DC Within dedicated suite. per secondary space onsite parking reg PartParkingmeet Parkingmust 6 forsuites secondary ulations of the Land Use Bylawwhich require Use Land the ulations of 1 DC-3- – 9, GOMUD Parcels GOMUD 9, -3- 9 district9 Avenue96 is and wide 28m is st Reading 33 www.morinville.ca Parking fromQuestions 1 • park Existing dwellingstyle area in is typically fordesigned onsite 4 Oriented DC-3- – ing spaces per dwelling. Minimum requiredfor a Ground MultipleUnit Dwellingwith a Secondary Suite is 2 1.+ 9, GOMUD Parcels GOMUD 9, st Reading 34 www.morinville.ca Parking fromQuestions 1 • Cou For comparison, on based standards. BylawUse minimum meetingspaces Land the 2 onsite withdesigned R- reading, Village Champlain VC2 GOMUDs are GOMUDs VC2 ncil ncil DC-3- – comments from 1 9, GOMUD Parcels GOMUD 9, st st Reading 35 www.morinville.ca Parking fromQuestions 1 DC-3- – On On * * Assuming all Lots build secondary suites. Maximum Parkingby LUB needed spaces spaces. 105 = TotalParking spaces provided 174= spaces LUB MinimumParking forSecondary Suites*35 Spaces = LUB MinimumParking forGOMUD dwellings70 Spaces = - - street Parking 34= Spaces site Parking140 on typical Spacesbased = build 9, GOMUD Parcels GOMUD 9, st Reading 36 www.morinville.ca Affordability fromQuestions 1 • • • while also adding adding to rental the also while stock Morinville. within tobuy 3 bedrooma non- households with income of around $60,000/year to qualify tobe applied to household incomechange this allows rental suiteincome secondary of 100% allowing Regulations tar By adding secondary suitespointpricethe increases to a pri The Existing Builder in the area has indicated that the target areas. residentialin densities diversityof housing types, forms, levelsof affordability, and Policy 8.23 ofMDP the - ce g et ofaround $330,000 however CMHC withMortgage point $285- is st 299,000 forexisting Tri Reading Mori condo dwelling unit in Morinville in condo unit dwelling 37 nville shall encourage a shall nville - Plex units. 38

Questions? 39

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC Face Covering Bylaw September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Iain Bushell, General Manager, ATTACHMENTS: Community & Infrastructure Services Bylaw 18/2020

PREPARED BY: Iain Bushell, General Manager, Community & Infrastructure Services

CLEARANCES: Brad White, Acting CAO RELEVANT BYLAWS / POLICIES / LEGISLATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council approve 1st and 2nd Readings, and consider 3rd Reading of proposed Bylaw 18/2020, a bylaw to temporarily mandate the wearing of face coverings in indoor public spaces and public vehicles.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the August 25, 2020 Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved the following motion: “That Council direct Administration to bring forward a draft mandatory face covering bylaw, including an effective trigger, for discussion at the September 15, 2020, Committee of the Whole meeting.”

At the September 15, 2020 Committee of the Whole meeting, referred Bylaw 18/2020 to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY:

In response to the widespread nature and cascading impacts of the COVID-19 virus, the Government of Alberta declared a State of Public Health Emergency on March 17, 2020. On June 15, 2020, the Government of Alberta's State of Public Health Emergency expired.

Phase 2 of Alberta’s Relaunch Strategy began on June 12, 2020. This included the reopening of many businesses with continued protections in place. Phase 2 also included relaxing some public gathering restrictions.

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______I.Bushell September 16, 2020 B. White September 16, 2020 General Manager, Community & Infrastructure Services ACAO

40

At the date of this report, Alberta remains in Phase 2, with no forecast date for Phase 3 and the lifting of the remaining restrictions. The Government of Alberta, through the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, has not mandated the use of masks in public spaces, but rather continues to offer guidance on when and where masks should be worn. Due to the lack of provincial direction, many Alberta municipalities have drafted and/or implemented Mandatory Face Covering bylaws aimed at further restricting the spread of the virus.

Alberta Health Services (AHS) publishes a daily update of the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in each region, including the Town of Morinville and Sturgeon County, which are considered separately. Regions are designated as open, watch or enhanced relaunch status. All regions must continue to follow Alberta’s public health measures and guidelines, regardless of relaunch status.

• “Open” Status o low level of risk, no additional restrictions in place o less than 50 active cases per 100,000 • “Watch” Status o the province is monitoring the risk and discussing with local government(s) and other community leaders the possible need for additional health measures o at least 10 active cases and more than 50 active cases per 100,000 • “Enhanced” Status o risk levels require enhanced public health measures to control the spread o informed by local context

Many municipalities have included a “trigger” for face coverings based upon the case numbers placing them onto “Watch” status as defined by the Alberta Health Services.

BUDGET/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS: Should a Mandatory Face Covering bylaw be implemented, and the effective “trigger” level of infections is reached, the Town of Morinville may receive requests to supply face coverings to affected residents, businesses and facilities.

LINKAGE TO BUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: • Strategic Plan Refresh o Social - We are committed to having Morinville continue to be recognized as a desirable friendly and safe community to live and work with a high quality of life.

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

• Administration to proceed as directed by Council. 41 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW 18/2020 MANDATORY FACE COVERINGS BYLAW PAGE 1

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF MORINVILLE, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO TEMPORARILY MANDATE THE WEARING OF FACE COVERINGS IN INDOOR PUBLIC PLACES AND PUBLIC VEHICLES.

WHEREAS, the World Health Organization, the Chief Public Health Officer of and the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta have identified Face Coverings as a way to reduce the transmission of the COVID-19 virus;

AND WHEREAS, pursuant to section 7 of the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c. M-16, a municipality may pass bylaws respecting: a. the safety, health and welfare of people and the protection of people and property; b. people, activities and things in, on or near a public place or place that is open to the public; and c. businesses, business activities and persons engaged in business;

AND WHEREAS, Council considers it appropriate to mandate the wearing of Face Coverings in Public Places and Public Vehicles subject to exceptions set out in this bylaw.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Town of Morinville, in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled, enacts as follows:

1. TITLE

1.1. This Bylaw shall be known as the “Face Covering Bylaw”

2. DEFINITIONS

In this bylaw, unless the context otherwise requires: 2.1. "face covering" means a medical or non-medical mask or other face covering that fully covers the nose, mouth, and chin;

2.2. public place” means any property or portion of a property, whether publicly or privately owned, to which members of the public have access as of right or by express or implied invitation, whether on payment of any fee or not;

2.3. public vehicle" means a motor vehicle used or offered for the transportation of at least one passenger in return for a fee, and includes but is not limited to motor vehicles typically referred to as buses, taxis, shuttles, transportation network vehicles, and limousines; and

42 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW 18/2020 MANDATORY FACE COVERINGS BYLAW PAGE 2

2.4. "violation ticket" has the same meaning as defined in the Provincial Offences Procedures Act, RSA 2000, c P34.

3. INTREPRETATION

3.1. The headings, titles, and margin notes in this bylaw are for ease of reference only. Nothing in this bylaw relieves a person from complying with any federal or provincial law, regulation or order, court order, or any lawful permit or license.

4. IN EFFECT

4.1. Sections 5 to 8 of this bylaw come into effect when the total number of COVID-19 cases within Morinville is reported by Alberta Health Services to be at least 10 active cases and more than 50 active cases per 100,000.

4.2. This bylaw shall remain in effect for 14 days following the date when the number of active cases within Morinville reported by Alberta Health Services falls below 10.

5. FACE COVERINGS MANDATORY

5.1. A person must wear a face covering at all times while in an indoor, enclosed, or substantially enclosed public place or in a public vehicle.

6. EXCEPTIONS

6.1. Section 4 does not apply to the following persons: 6.1.1. persons under the age of 10;

6.1.2. persons who are unable to place, use, or remove a face covering without assistance;

6.1.3. persons unable to wear a face covering due to a mental or physical concern or limitation, or a protected ground under the Alberta Human Rights Act, RSA 2000, c A25.5, as may be amended;

6.1.4. persons consuming food or drink in designated seating areas or as part of a religious or spiritual ceremony;

6.1.5. persons engaged in physical activities, water activities or the paid supervision of water activities, or attending within a sauna or steam room; 43 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW 18/2020 MANDATORY FACE COVERINGS BYLAW PAGE 3

6.1.6. persons providing care or assistance to a person with a disability where a face covering would hinder that caregiving or assistance;

6.1.7. persons engaging in services that require the temporary removal of a face covering;

6.1.8. persons participating in a dance, theatrical or musical public performance, if all participants in the performance are able to maintain at least two metres of physical distance from each other and do not enter the areas where the public is viewing the performance;

6.1.9. persons providing or receiving a service that requires personal consultation if that activity occurs in a closed office or meeting room and all participants in the personal consultation are able to maintain physical separation of at least two metres from each other; and

6.1.10. persons separated from others by physical barriers or shields such as plexiglass

6.2. Section 4 does not apply to the following places:

6.2.1. schools and other educational facilities;

6.2.2. hospitals and health-care facilities;

6.2.3. child care facilities; and

6.2.4. areas exclusively accessed or used by the public place’s employees or a public vehicle operator, or platform and stage areas in places of worship during worship services, provided that physical barriers or physical distancing practices are implemented between any person not required to wear a face covering by operation of this exception and any other person.

7. ENFORCEMENT

7.1. Any person who contravenes any provision of this bylaw is guilty of an offence and liable to a minimum penalty of $100.

44 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW 18/2020 MANDATORY FACE COVERINGS BYLAW PAGE 4

7.2. The levying and payment of any fine provided in this Bylaw shall not relieve a person from the necessity of paying any fees, charges or costs from which said person is liable in accordance with this bylaw or pursuant to the Municipal Government Act.

8. VIOLATION TAGS AND TICKETS

8.1. A peace officer may issue a violation tag to any person whom the peace officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe has contravened any provision of this Bylaw.

8.2. If the violation tag is not paid within the prescribed time period, the peace officer may issue a violation ticket.

8.3. Notwithstanding section 7.1 of this Bylaw, a peace officer may immediately issue a violation ticket to any person whom the peace officer has reasonable grounds to believe has contravened any provision of this bylaw. Where a Peace Officer believes that any person has contravened any section of this bylaw, they may serve upon such person a violation ticket in the form and manner as prescribed by the provisions of the Provincial Offences Procedure Act, Chapter P-34, RSA 2000, and all amendments thereto.

8.4. If a violation ticket is issued for an offence under this bylaw, the violation ticket may: 8.4.1. specify the fine amount established by this bylaw for the offence; or 8.4.2. require a person to appear in court without the alternative of making a voluntary payment.

9. EFFECTIVE DATE

9.1. This bylaw comes into effect on the date of third and final reading.

45 TOWN OF MORINVILLE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW 18/2020 MANDATORY FACE COVERINGS BYLAW PAGE 5

10. REPEAL DATE

10.1. This bylaw is repealed on December 31, 2020.

READ a first time this ____day of ______, 2020.

READ a second time this ____day of ______, 2020.

READ a third and finally passed this _____ day of ______, 2020.

______Barry Turner Mayor

______Stephane Labonne Chief Administrative Officer 46

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC Municipal Stimulus Program September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Stephane Labonne, CAO ATTACHMENTS: • MSP Options Presentation PREPARED BY: Iain Bushell, General Manager, • MSP Program Guidelines Community & Infrastructure Services • MSP Allocations Shawna Jason, CPA, Director, • MSP Application Form Corporate Services

CLEARANCES: Brad White, Acting CAO RELEVANT BYLAWS / POLICIES / LEGISLATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council approve the list of capital projects eligible for funding through the Government of Alberta’s Municipal Stimulus Program and direct Administration to submit funding applications by October 1, 2020.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the August 25, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved the following motion: “That Council direct Administration to bring forward a final list of capital projects eligible for funding through the Government of Alberta’s Municipal Stimulus Program, including the Splash Park Replacement, RMSC Outdoor Rink Replacement, RMSC Outdoor Building and Tennis Court Rehabilitation, Missing Shared-use Path Linkages and five high-priority short-term items from the Transportation Master Plan, with all items coming back with a good-better-best options approach to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council.”

BACKGROUND SUMMARY:

On July 28, 2020 the Government of Alberta (GoA) announced a $1.1 billion program to build core infrastructure intended to get Albertans working, and to provide support for municipalities including relief for delivering public transit. Of the $1.1 billion announced, dedicated funding includes the following: • $500 million to build shovel-ready infrastructure projects starting in 2020

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______I. Bushell September 15, 2020 B. White September 15, 2020 General Manager, Community & Infrastructure Services ACAO

47

• Matching funding with the Government of Canada totalling $233 million to support municipal operating costs in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic • $70 million to support public transit operating costs

Specifically, the Municipal Stimulus Program (MSP) provides additional capital infrastructure funding to municipalities with the primary objective to sustain and create local jobs, enhance provincial competitiveness and productivity, position communities to participate in future economic growth, and reduce municipal red-tape to promote job-creating private sector investment.

Program Details: • $500-million allocation-based program structured on the Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI), for construction of capital projects before December 31, 2021. • Funding is distributed based on the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) allocation formula (largely per capita with a $50,000 minimum; summer villages receive a base of $5,000 plus the per capita amount). • Project eligibility based on MSI guidelines, modified to exclude categories and activities with minimal contribution to economic recovery. • Municipalities have broad discretion to apply for projects within the eligibility criteria, but Minister retains authority to approve projects. • Municipalities will be required to report on progress in reducing municipal red tape.

Program Objectives: • Sustain and create local jobs. • Enhance provincial competitiveness and productivity. • Position communities to participate in future economic growth. • Reduce municipal red-tape to promote job-creating private sector investment.

Program Overview: • Program is open to municipal authorities, Metis Settlements, and the Townsite of Redwood Meadows. • Municipalities must commit to submitting an annual Red Tape Reduction report for each of 2020 and 2021. They will be required to indicate to the Minister’s satisfaction how they have made progress in the following areas since the stimulus program was announced: o What steps have been taken to make it easier to start up a new business in the municipality? o What steps have been taken to streamline processes and shorten timelines for development and permit approvals? o What steps have been taken to make the municipality a more attractive destination for new investment and/or tourism? • The red tape reduction report template will require municipalities to identify how they have reduced red tape from among several provided options, or they may identify their own actions. They will also be required to provide relevant metrics and/or a qualitative description of actions they have taken. • Projects must begin construction in 2020 or 2021, and all funds must be expended before December 31, 2021, or repaid to the province. However, projects may continue past this date using other sources of funding. • Municipalities must indicate the amount of funding required in both 2020 and 2021 for each project. o Payments for 2020 expenditures will be issued once municipalities sign the conditional grant agreement and receive approval on their project application(s). 48

o Payments for 2021 expenditures will be issued in May 2021, unless municipalities identify a requirement to receive funding earlier. • Projects must result in the construction or major rehabilitation of a capital asset that falls within one of the eligible categories. • Project categories are based on modified MSI project categories. o Some MSI eligible projects, such as rolling stock, equipment purchases, and infrastructure management systems are not be eligible, as they do not support economic development or job creation. • Projects must not create new operational funding requirements for the province and must not, as a result of the projects, lead to higher/increased municipal taxes. • Projects previously approved for MSI or GTF funding are not eligible and municipalities will not be permitted to withdraw and resubmit MSI or GTF projects to gain eligibility. • Proponents must attest that the project would not go ahead this year or next year in the absence of support through the stimulus program.

Allocations • Funding is allocated using the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) formula (per capita with a minimum funding amount of $50,000) • Approximately 30.6% will go to , 23.1% will go to Edmonton, and 46.3% will go to other municipalities. • The allocated amounts represent the maximum funding available to municipalities through the MSP. Municipalities must commit their funding allocation to project(s) by October 1, 2020, or risk losing access to their allocation. Municipalities must also spend all allocated funding on accepted project(s) by December 31, 2021. • The Town of Morinville will be eligible to receive $1,175,972 in Municipal Stimulus Funding.

Eligible / Ineligible Projects • Project categories include construction, betterment, rehabilitation and non-routine maintenance of roads, bridges, water and wastewater systems, public transit and recreation. Eligible costs are identified within Schedules 2 and 3 of the Program Guidelines. • Land acquisition costs, system-wide infrastructure studies and management software, functional planning and purchase of other equipment are not eligible for MSP funding. Ineligible costs are identified within Schedule 4 of the Program Guidelines. • Projects previously submitted under the MSI and/or Federal Gast Tax (FGT) capital grant programs are not eligible for MSP funding. Municipalities are not permitted to withdraw MSI and FGT to gain eligibility for the MSP.

In advance of the upcoming 2021 Operating Budget and 25-year Capital Plan deliberations, Administration has undertaken an exercise, using the City of St. Albert’s Capital Project Prioritization Framework, to prioritize all capital projects in the plan, which has not been done previously. The outcome of this work will provide Administration and Council with a prioritized list of capital projects including both current capital projects, as well as those identified in plans such as the Transportation Master Plan, Fire Services Master Plan, Parks, Recreation, Culture and Trails Master Plan, to name a few.

In addition, requests from the Government of Alberta through various channels, has offered the Town of Morinville to put forward capital projects including: • East Boundary Road • Replacement RCMP Detachment • Phase 2 of 100 Street and Westwinds Drive

49

Realizing the MSP timelines, previous Council decisions and deliberations, affordability, project- readiness and incomplete prioritization process, Administration has prioritized the following seven infrastructure projects for Council’s consideration, and as directed, Administration has brought forward further cost estimates (where required) to utilize the MSP funding:

Project # Project Title Good Better Best (Lowest cost) 1 Missing Shared-Use Trail $289,750 $683,810 $900,000 Linkages 2 Splash Park Replacement $246,287 $483,686 $602,310 3 RMSC Outdoor Rink $43,000 $269,920 $395,000 4 RMSC Destination Building $95,000 $285,000 $1,139,900 5 Tennis Court N/A $121,000 N/A 6 TMP – Curb Extensions on 100 N/A $530,000 N/A Avenue 7 TMP – Intersection Upgrades at N/A $445,000 N/A 101 Avenue/100 Street 8 TMP – Trail Construction on 100 N/A $85,000 N/A Street north of 105 Avenue 9 TMP – Intersection Signalization N/A $445,000 N/A at Cardiff Road/100 Street 10 TMP – Install left/right turn lanes N/A $10,000 N/A on 95 Avenue at 100 Street TOTAL $674,037 $3,358,416 $3,037,210

The Safety Initiative Reserve is currently funding two projects for 2020 totaling $270,732 (EBR – MLC Street Lights and Partial funding of Trail Solar Lights) and has an anticipated year-end balance of $75,600 (includes estimated 2020 net photo radar revenue of $75,000).

As noted, the above projects were prioritized based on recent approvals and/or discussions with Council regarding outdoor amenities, assets nearing or at end of life, master plan documents, reference to our current approved long-range capital plan along with the alignment to Council’s Strategic Plan. This prioritized list of initiatives would not result in the Town incurring additional expenditures however, this funding allows the Town to advance the timing of some or all of these initiatives (all of which are otherwise included within our 25-year Capital Plan). The Town has limited borrowing capacity with multiple competing capital priorities over the next 5 years. Proceeding with larger infrastructure investments (such as East Boundary Road, $2.8M) would be considered an eligible project, however; would further constrain the Town’s limited borrowing capacity; which would likely create financial challenges for the Town to fully fund the long-term capital plan.

Administration Process and Timing Process Step Estimated Timing Program Introduction Program materials available by July 8, • Application process, program guidelines, and 2020 allocation amounts are posted on a program website • Municipal Affairs hosts webinar for municipalities to provide additional details 50

First Project Intake Period • Until October 1, 2020 • Municipalities prepare and submit applications • Project approvals on a rolling basis, • Submitted applications uploaded into SharePoint as soon as reviewed • Project reviews • Project reviews continue until • Project approvals complete Re-allocation Period Fall 2020 Funds uncommitted by municipalities to an approved project re-allocated by the Minister Second Project Intake Period (if required) • February 1, 2021, to April 1, 2021 Second intake opened if substantial amounts of funding • Project reviews continue until remain unallocated after first intake complete, approvals issued as decisions are made Project Initiation Following project approval • Notification letters sent to successful applicants • Recipients sign conditional grant agreements Project Administration • Payments following signing of • Payments to recipients conditional grant agreements and • Project construction approval of project applications • Payments complete by October 2021 Reporting Requirements Red Tape Reduction Reporting • 2020 reporting • February 1, 2021 (2020 progress) • 2021 reporting • February 1, 2022 (2021 progress) Financial Reporting • May 1, 2021 (2020 reporting) • May 1, 2022 (2021 reporting)

LINKAGE TO BUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Long Range Financial & Capital Plan Effective Governance

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

As directed by Council

51

Municipal Stimulus Program Options 52

Missing Link Trails Upgrades www.morinville.ca $289,750 • Good Upgrade gravelthe trail in the Lakes to a 3.0 m wide trailasphalt 53 www.morinville.ca • Better $683,810 3.0 Upgradegravel the trailsLakes in the in Notreand to Dame a m wide asphalt trail.m asphalt wide 54 www.morinville.ca $900,000 • Best • areas. 3.0 Upgradegravel the trailsLakes in the in Notreand to Dame a incl Complete trailrepairs and upgrades throughout the system, m wide asphalt trail.m asphalt wide udi ng Fishtheand Game pond, HeritageLake and other 55 56

Splash Park www.morinville.ca Current State 57 www.morinville.ca • • • Good $246,287 Public WorksPublic removal with can assist and Replace control the shed with a control box features similar and sizepad same the with Replace (operationaldollars impact) and 58 gro und w ork www.morinville.ca • • • Better $483,687 Public WorksPublic removal with can assist and Replace control the shed with a control box larger Replace slightly with a features size additional but (operationaldollars impact) and 59 gro und w ork www.morinville.ca • • • Best $602,310 Public WorksPublic removal with can assist and Replace control the shed with a control box larger featuresReplace sizesignificantly with a and additional (operationaldollars impact) and 60 gro und w ork 61

Outdoor Ice Rink www.morinville.ca Current State 62 www.morinville.ca $43,040 • • • Least Favourable May extendliferink byyears 5 PublicWorks repairs/patchesthe wooden boards overlay New asphalt 63 www.morinville.ca $269,92 • • • Better May extendlife by 15years additionalwith maintenance costs New boards and outdoor benches Excavate and replaceasphalt base 0 64 www.morinville.ca $395, • • • • • Best Will haveWill 30 a year+ lifespan lowercosts with maintenance other) (basketball,use pickleball, season All Team benches New boards New concrete base 00 0 65 www.morinville.ca Gibbons Gibbons Outdoor Rink 66 67

RMSC Destination Building www.morinville.ca Current State 68 www.morinville.ca • A basic, 2,000 square foot stick Basic $95,000 • N • o drawings or design havebeendone (napkin estimate) 1000 400 600 sq sq sq ft in bathroomsft in ft garageft formaintenance ft in the viewing area viewing ft in the 69 - built garagebuilt buildingwith: www.morinville.ca • A custom Better $285, • • facility with: 1000 500 400 r ubbe 00 sq sq 0 sq rizedflooring, HVAC - built wood frame/commercial built grade squarefoot 1900 ft commercialgradeft washrooms garage,maintenanceft door 9x9 ft viewing area including a raised, accessibleplatform, 70 www.morinville.ca Builder’s Proposal 71 www.morinville.ca $1,139,900 • Glazed frontsprovide unobstructed views to recreational summer winter in and Inviting atmosphereboth • Pavilion• orientedto buildings provide daylight ample frompoints surrounding access area multiple sitewith Unique • Architectdesigned with: Best - barrier as such Amenities • and attractive lines formsimple in Clean, • • Buffer landscape provides refuge from trafficand buildings • Overhangs, canopies and circular firepits provide shade and preparationkitchen and indoor shelter skating - rink,splashpark and playground perfectfor community small picnic or barbeques free familyfree washrooms, picnic 72 fire place ice ice www.morinville.ca ArchitecturallyFacility Designed 73 www.morinville.ca Designed Facility Architecturally 74 75

Tennis Court www.morinville.ca Current State 76 www.morinville.ca $121,10 • • • • Better Tennis coating court finish New exteriorfencing nets New Excavate and replaceasphalt surface 0 77 www.morinville.ca Tennis Court Destination Building Destination Outdoor Rink Splash Park Trails Link Missing Project Summary N/A $95,000 $43,000 $246,287 $289,750 Good? 78 $121,100 $285,000 $269,920 $483,687 $683,810 Better N/A $1,139,900 $395,000 $602,310 $900,000 Best 79

Questions? 80

Municipal Stimulus Program (MSP)

Program Guidelines

Municipal Affairs, Government of Alberta July 2020 Municipal Stimulus Program www.alberta.ca/municipal-stimulus-program.aspx

Classification: Public 81

Table of Contents

1. Guidelines ...... 4

2. Program Objectives...... 4

3. Key Dates and Contacts ...... 4

4. Submission Method ...... 5

5. Funding Formula and Allocations ...... 5

6. Program Eligibility and Conditions ...... 6 6.1) Eligible Applicants ...... 6 6.2) Eligible Projects ...... 6 6.3) Red Tape Reduction ...... 7

7. Application Process ...... 8 7.1) Grouping Similar Assets ...... 9 7.2) Use of Municipal Forces ...... 9 7.3) Joint Projects ...... 9 7.4) Use of Other Grants...... 10

8. Review and Approval Process ...... 10 8.1) Provincial Standards ...... 11 8.2) Requirements for Award of Contracts ...... 11

9. Payment Process...... 12

10. Financial Reporting Requirements ...... 12 10.1) Statement of Funding and Expenditures (SFEs) ...... 12 10.2) Carrying Forward Funds ...... 13 10.3) Credit Items ...... 13

10.4) Income Earned ...... 14

11. Site Visits ...... 14

12. Communications and Project Recognition Requirements...... 14

Schedule 1: Entities Eligible for a Contribution ...... 15

2 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 82

Schedule 2: Eligible Capital Project Activities ...... 16 2.a) Construction and Development ...... 16 2.b) Betterment ...... 17

2.c) Rehabilitation ...... 17 2.d) Non-routine Maintenance ...... 17 2.e) Other ...... 18

Schedule 3: Eligible Capital Project Assets ...... 18 3.a) Municipal Roadways, Bridges, and Related Facilities and Equipment ...... 18

3.b) Public Transit Facilities ...... 19 3.c) Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution Systems ...... 19 3.d) Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems ...... 19

3.e) Storm Water Drainage Systems and Facilities ...... 20 3.f) Solid Waste Management Facilities and Equipment ...... 20 3.g) Police, Fire and Emergency Services ...... 20 3.h) Disaster Mitigation ...... 21

3.i) Regional and Community Airport Facilities and Equipment ...... 21 3.j) General Government and Administration ...... 21

3.k) Public Health and Welfare ...... 22 3.l) Parks, Recreation, Sports, and Other Community Facilities ...... 22

3.m) Libraries ...... 22

Schedule 4: Ineligible Capital Projects Activities ...... 23 4.a) Acquisition ...... 23 4.b) Functional Planning, Studies, and Infrastructure Management Systems ...... 24

4.c) General Government and Administration ...... 24 4.d) Operating Support ...... 24

4.e) Other ...... 25

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 3 Classification: Public 83

1. Guidelines These guidelines are intended to assist local governments in participating in the Municipal Stimulus Program (MSP) and in complying with the program terms and conditions. Local governments include municipal authorities, Metis Settlements, and the Townsite of Redwood Meadows (referred to as ‘municipalities’ in these guidelines).

2. Program Objectives Through the MSP, the Government of Alberta (GOA) is providing additional capital infrastructure funding to municipalities with the primary objective to sustain and create local jobs; enhance provincial competitiveness and productivity; position communities to participate in future economic growth; and reduce municipal red-tape to promote job-creating private sector investment.

3. Key Dates and Contacts

ACTIVITY TIMELINE

Project Application Submission Submit by October 1, 2020

Executed Memorandum of Submit with first project application (by October 1, Agreement 2020)

2020 Payment Upon project acceptance (payments anticipated to commence in September 2020)

2021 Payment Once reporting requirements are met (anticipated to commence in May 2021)

Statement of Funding and Due May 1, 2021 for 2020 expenditures Expenditures (SFE) Due May 1, 2022 for 2021 expenditures

Red Tape Reduction Report Due Feb 1, 2021 for progress made in 2020 Due Feb 1, 2022 for progress made in 2021

Please contact a Grant Advisor at 780-422-7125 (toll-free 310-0000) or email [email protected] if you have any questions or concerns.

4 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 84

4. Submission Method The project application form and the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) will be emailed to municipalities.

The application form(s) must be signed by the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) or an authorized representative before being returned to Municipal Affairs. Municipalities are strongly encouraged to sign the forms with a digital signature and return them in their original PDF format by e-mail to [email protected].

The MOA must be signed by the Chief Elected Official and CAO or duly authorized signing officer. Municipalities should complete the MOA, including witnesses for each signatory, and scan and submit them via email to [email protected]. Project applications will not be forwarded to the Minister until an executed MOA is received.

Municipalities are strongly encouraged to submit all project applications at one time.

The SFE form and the outline for the Red Tape Reduction report will be made available to municipalities at a later date.

Questions related to the submission of the application, the Memorandum of Agreement, or reporting documents can be directed to a Grant Advisor by calling 780-422-7125 (toll-free 310-0000) or [email protected].

5. Funding Formula and Allocations MSP funding is allocated to municipalities based on a funding formula. Municipalities must commit their funding allocation to one or more projects by October 1, 2020, or risk losing access to their allocation. Municipalities must also spend all allocated funding on an accepted project(s) by December 31, 2021 (see Section 10.2).

Each municipality active as of July 1, 2020, will have access to a funding amount allocated on a per capita basis, according to the 2019 Municipal Affairs Population List. Municipalities with smaller populations will have access to a minimum allocation of $50,000, with the exception of summer villages, which will have access to a base allocation of $5,000, in addition to the per capita amount. The Minister retains the authority to exclude Improvement Districts that do not have advisory councils and have limited capital infrastructure needs from the funding allocation formula.

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 5 Classification: Public 85

Municipalities will lose access to any portion of their allocation that is not committed to an accepted project submitted as of October 1, 2020. The disposition of any uncommitted funding after October 1, 2020, will be at the discretion of the Minister.

6. Program Eligibility and Conditions 6.1) Eligible Applicants For program purposes, an eligible applicant is referred to as a ‘municipality’ and includes any city, town, village, summer village, specialized municipality, municipal district, improvement district, special area, Metis settlement, and the Townsite of Redwood Meadows Administration Society.

Applicants may contribute funds to other eligible entities for eligible MSP projects that provide a municipal service or benefit and do not limit public access. A list of entities eligible for a contribution is provided in Schedule 1. If a municipality contributes funds to such an entity, the municipality remains responsible for all program terms and conditions described in these guidelines, including the need to report on project expenditures.

6.2) Eligible Projects

MSP funding is limited to projects that would not go forward in the absence of support through the stimulus program.

Project eligibility is similar to the Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI), with modifications to ensure projects meet stimulus program objectives. Eligible project categories include construction, betterment, rehabilitation and non-routine maintenance of roads, bridges, water and wastewater systems, public transit, and recreation. A detailed list of eligible activities and project categories is provided in Schedules 2 and 3.

Land acquisition costs, system-wide infrastructure studies and management software, functional planning, and purchase of rolling stock and other equipment are not eligible for MSP funding. For a list of ineligible expenditures, see Schedule 4.

Construction of eligible projects must begin in calendar year 2020 or 2021. Projects do not need to be complete by the end of 2021. MSP funds must be expended by the end of 2021, but longer-term projects can continue with funding from other sources.

Projects previously submitted under the MSI and/or federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) are not eligible for MSP funding. Municipalities are not permitted to withdraw MSI and GTF projects to gain eligibility for the MSP.

6 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 86

In addition, operation of assets constructed with support from the MSP must not require dedicated funding from the province (for example, affordable housing projects with provincial operating funding implications).

6.3) Red Tape Reduction Municipalities must commit to submitting an annual Red Tape Reduction report for each of 2020 and 2021 indicating how they have made progress in at least one of the following areas, including a qualitative description of specific actions taken:

 What steps have been taken to make it easier to start up a new business in the municipality?

 What steps have been taken to streamline processes and shorten timelines for development and permit approvals?

 What steps have been taken to make the municipality a more attractive destination for new investment and/or tourism?

Red tape reduction reports are separate from the Statement of Funding and Expenditures described in section 10. Municipalities will be required to submit the annual red tape reduction report in a prescribed format, which will require municipalities to identify how they have reduced red tape from among several provided options, or they may identify their own actions. Municipalities will also be required to provide relevant metrics and/or a qualitative description of specific actions they have taken. The template for the red tape reduction report will be made available to municipalities at a later date.

The first red tape reduction report must be signed by the CAO and submitted to the province by February 1, 2021, describing progress in the above categories in the 2020 calendar year.

The second red tape reduction report must be signed by the CAO and submitted to the province by February 1, 2022, describing progress in the above categories in the 2021 calendar year. All municipalities, including those that completed and fully funded all of their projects in 2020, must submit the 2021 report.

While municipalities may undertake actions based on their own circumstances and priorities, the Minister retains authority to require a refund for any funding provided if municipalities fail to undertake and report on satisfactory actions to reduce red tape.

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 7 Classification: Public 87

7. Application Process Each eligible applicant may submit a maximum of five project applications. The total amount of funding sought from the MSP must not exceed the initial allocation amount.

All project applications must be submitted on the prescribed application form by October 1, 2020. If a municipality does not have sufficient accepted projects submitted as of October 1, 2020, any uncommitted portion of funding remaining may be reallocated or otherwise disposed of at the discretion of the Minister.

Project applications should include sufficient information to determine project eligibility and must include an attestation that the projects would not go ahead this year or next year in the absence of support through the MSP.

Municipalities must also attest that the project will not result in municipal tax increases, whether through a municipal contribution to the construction of the project or through increased operating costs associated with the resulting capital asset. Municipalities may be asked to demonstrate how they intend to fund a municipal contribution to the project, or how they will support operating expenses associated with the resulting capital asset. These must be funded through means other than increasing property taxes, such as through budget reductions in other areas, user fees, or other grant programs.

For each project, the application form must be fully completed and must include the following information:

 a description of the project (including the proper name of the resulting asset, a summary of project activities, and sufficient detail to determine that the project meets eligibility requirements);

 a description of how the project aligns with the MSP objectives (identified in section 2);

 project timelines (including estimated project start and completion dates);

 estimated project costs by year of expenditure; and

 where applicable, partnerships (including municipal partner names).

Applications must be signed by the CAO, or duly authorized authority, who certifies that the information is correct and in accordance with the program guidelines and funding agreements. Digital signatures are encouraged.

Project amendments are not permitted under the MSP.

8 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 88

If an accepted project is completed at a lower cost and requires less MSP funding, the funding reduction must be indicated at the time the completed project is reported on the Statement of Funding and Expenditures and the over-funded amount must be applied to other accepted MSP projects or refunded to the GOA.

If costs for an accepted project increase and the municipality has sufficient MSP funding remaining from other MSP projects completed under budget (i.e., funding that has already been paid to the municipality), available MSP funding can be applied to the project with increased costs. If such funding is not available, the project cost increase must be fully covered using funding sources other than MSP.

7.1) Grouping Similar Assets A separate application is required for each capital asset, except where assets can be grouped together because they are related to the same system (road construction and replacement of associated sidewalks, water and wastewater lines). A system is a group of independent but interrelated elements that share functional or structural relationships, which comprise a unified capital asset, and where the function of an independent component impacts the functioning of the entire system.

See Schedule 2 and 3 for a complete list of project activities and assets that qualify for MSP funding. Schedule 4 outlines ineligible activities.

7.2) Use of Municipal Forces Costs related to the use of municipal forces (i.e., staff and equipment) is not eligible for MSP funding, unless the municipality is unable to secure a private sector vendor to carry out the project.

In the event that no reasonable alternative vendor is available to carry out the project and municipal forces will be required, the municipality must declare so on the project application. In these circumstances, eligible costs can include all labour costs, including benefits, attributable to work carried out on- and off-site (see Schedule 2). Labour costs associated with general municipal administration of the project are not eligible.

7.3) Joint Projects Projects that involve funding from more than one municipality should identify all contributing parties in the application.

Each municipality must submit an application for its own portion of the project to be funded by MSP. The municipality that is directly responsible for the project should include the complete

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 9 Classification: Public 89

financial information (total project costs), listing the contributions of the other municipality(ies) in the “Other Funding Sources” line of the application financial grid. The other contributing municipality(ies) should include only its portion/contribution of these costs.

7.4) Use of Other Grants Use of other grants is not permitted under the MSP, unless the municipality applied for funding under the other grant program after the MSP project has been accepted, and doing so is allowed by that program.

For example, a municipality may supplement MSP funding with MSI or GTF funding but only if the MSI/GTF application is submitted after the MSP project is accepted. For example, if the total project costs are $1 million, and the project was accepted under MSP for $800,000, the municipality may subsequently submit an MSI and/or GTF project application to fund the remaining $200,000.

When choosing to use multiple grant funding sources, it is the municipality’s responsibility to understand the separate requirements of each grant program. More information about the requirements of other provincial grant programs can be found on the Municipal Grants Web Portal at www.alberta.ca/municipalities-funding.aspx.

8. Review and Approval Process Program staff will review each project to ensure it meets the requirements outlined in these guidelines.

Municipalities should ensure all relevant sections of the application form are completed to facilitate a faster and more efficient review process. Municipalities will be contacted by a Grant Advisor if the project review process warrants follow-up and will be required to respond within 10 business days or by October 1, whichever is earlier. If a response is not received within 10 business days, the project in question will be withdrawn and the municipality will be notified of the project withdrawal by email.

Project recommendations will be forwarded to the Minister once the submitted project applications are reviewed and an executed Memorandum of Agreement is received. The Minister will review all projects against the program objectives and eligibility criteria. Decisions by the Minister regarding project status are final.

Municipalities will be advised of project status via email.

10 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 90

Municipalities may proceed with a project in anticipation that it will be accepted for MSP funding. However, if the project is deemed ineligible, the municipality remains responsible for all financial obligations it has undertaken with respect to the project.

8.1) Provincial Standards It is expected that MSP-funded projects undertaken by municipalities will comply with provincially regulated standards. For example, MSP-funded projects involving regional water and wastewater systems should appropriately align with the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, administered by Alberta Environment and Parks. Where an MSP project includes work on a highway under provincial jurisdiction, the municipality must enter into a separate agreement with Alberta Transportation to carry out the work and/or receive permission to access the highway right-of-way. Grant advisors may request confirmation of the agreement.

8.2) Requirements for Award of Contracts All calls for proposals or tenders for projects to be funded under MSP shall be carried out in accordance with the rules, regulations, and laws governing such activities and in accordance with the best current practices. They must also be advertised in accordance with the guidelines of the New West Partnership Trade Agreement (NWPTA) (www.newwestpartnershiptrade.ca), effective July 2010, and the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) (www.cfta-alec.ca/agreement-on- internal-trade).

The municipality may award contracts for planning, design, engineering, and architectural services for a municipal capital infrastructure project based on best overall value consistent with the municipality’s policies.

The municipality may award contracts for the construction of a municipal capital infrastructure project by public tender based on either unit prices or lump sum amounts. The MSP does not require municipalities to award projects to the lowest tender and does not prohibit municipalities from using a process that qualifies suppliers prior to the close of call for tenders where the process is consistent with the CFTA and NWPTA.

Where a municipality has been unable to secure a private sector vendor, or anticipates that this will be the case, the municipality may utilize its own forces, including municipal staff and equipment, in accordance with section 7.2.

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 11 Classification: Public 91

9. Payment Process MSP payments are based on annual cash flow requirements for accepted projects, meaning that if payment conditions are met, the amount paid in 2020 is based on the cash flow required in 2020 and the amount paid in 2021 is based on the cash flow required in 2021. Municipalities with cash flow requirements in 2020 will be paid shortly after project acceptance.

MSP payments are conditional on execution of the MSP Memorandum of Agreement governing the funding process, and the 2021 payment is also conditional on receiving the red tape reduction report (due February 1, 2021) and certification of the 2020 SFE (due May 1, 2021).

For example, a municipality has been allocated $1 million in MSP funding and has two accepted projects: one with MSP funding of $600,000 to be completed in 2020 and the other with MSP funding of $400,000, with $50,000 in design costs to be incurred in 2020 and $350,000 in construction costs to be incurred in 2021.  The total payment to this municipality in 2020 will be $650,000, conditional on execution of the funding agreement.

 The remaining $350,000 will be paid in May of 2021, conditional on certification of the 2020 Statement of Funding and Expenditures and receipt of the 2020 Red Tape Reduction report.

10. Financial Reporting Requirements 10.1) Statement of Funding and Expenditures (SFEs) By May 1 of the following program year, each municipality is required to submit an SFE that reports the previous program year’s expenditures (e.g., the 2020 SFE is due by May 1, 2021).

The SFE form will be made available to municipalities at a later date, and will capture information such as the amount of MSP funding spent on each approved MSP project in the preceding year.

Municipalities will be required to report on the amount of MSP funding spent on the approved capital asset, regardless of whether the project is undertaken by the municipality, a different municipality, or a different entity listed in Schedule 1.

For example, if a municipality contributes funds to a Regional Service Commission to undertake a water distribution project, the municipality must report on how much funding was spent on the project and not on the amount of funding contributed to the Regional Service Commission.

12 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 92

As part of the SFE, municipalities will also be required to provide basic information regarding the resulting capital asset for each completed project, which the government will use in measuring the performance of the program.

All projects listed on the SFE must be accepted by the Minister.

The municipality must maintain separate accounting records for MSP grant funds.

All supporting documentation, such as reports, drawings, and invoices for each project must be retained by the municipality for a minimum of three years following completion of the project. SFEs may be subject to a review by the Provincial Auditor General.

SFEs must be submitted electronically by the CAO or an authorized representative of the municipality. SFE reporting requirements are separate from the Red Tape Reduction report described in section 6.3.

10.2) Carrying Forward Funds MSP funding paid to municipalities in 2020 and not expended in the current year may be carried forward to 2021. Any funding carried forward to 2021 must be expended on an accepted project before December 31, 2021.

If any MSP funding paid to municipalities has not been fully expended by December 31, 2021, it must be refunded to the GOA.

Time extensions for unspent MSP funds will not be granted.

10.3) Credit Items When MSP funding results in net proceeds to the municipality, within five years of project completion, these proceeds will have to be returned to the GOA.

These credit items can include:

 net proceeds (to a maximum of grant applied) from the sale of land bettered (i.e., rehabilitated, reclaimed or remediated) with MSP funds;

 appraised value of unsold land bettered (i.e., rehabilitated, reclaimed or remediated) with MSP funds, but not required for the project;

 net proceeds (to a maximum of the grant amount applied) from the sale of capital assets constructed with MSP funds;

 net proceeds from an insurance claim on capital assets constructed with MSP funds; and

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 13 Classification: Public 93

 net salvage value (to a maximum of grant applied) on disposal of any asset purchased with MSP funds, or from any material obtained from removal or demolition of any structure or any part of a facility constructed with MSP funds.

10.4) Income Earned The municipality may invest and earn income on all unexpended MSP funds, subject to the provisions of Section 250 of the Municipal Government Act. The amount of income earned on these funds must be applied to eligible costs of accepted MSP projects.

11. Site Visits Following program completion, Municipal Affairs program representatives may select and visit a number of municipalities to discuss the MSP specific to a completed project and the overall experience with the program.

12. Communications and Project Recognition Requirements Signage for MSP funded projects must follow the GOA signage guidelines found at www.alberta.ca/goa/standards/standards-and-reference-documents.aspx (refer to the Capital project signage section of the Visual Identity Manual).

Costs associated with communications and project recognition required to meet GOA signage guidelines are eligible for MSP funding (see Schedule 2e).

To discuss project recognition options or communications requirements, please call Municipal Affairs at 780-422-7125, toll free by first dialing 310-0000, or email [email protected].

14 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 94

Schedule 1: Entities Eligible for a Contribution Applicants may contribute funds to the following eligible entities:

 non-profit organizations, as defined in Section 241 of the Municipal Government Act (MGA) (i.e., a society, credit union or co-operative established under a law of Canada or Alberta; a corporation that is prohibited from paying dividends to its members and distributing the assets to its members on a winding up; or any other entity established under a law of Canada or Alberta for a purpose other than to make a profit).

 libraries and library systems established under the Libraries Act;

 regional services commissions established under Part 15.1 of the MGA;

 controlled corporations as defined in Section 241 of the MGA; and

 provincial agencies, crown-controlled school jurisdictions, universities, colleges, technical institutes, the Alberta Health Services Board, and other health boards, excluding charter schools and school societies that are included in the GOA annual report.

When contributing to a non-profit organization, the municipality must bind the organization to all MSP conditions and obligations that apply to the municipality with respect to the project, including adherence to provincial regulations/standards and Municipal Affairs access to project records; and maintain adequate control over public access to the asset, or over the municipal service that it provides.

It is recommended the municipality enter into a binding legal agreement with the non-profit organization to protect the municipal interest in the asset or facility and to meet the obligations of the certification. Municipal Affairs does not require a copy of this agreement.

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 15 Classification: Public 95

Schedule 2: Eligible Capital Project Activities Costs directly related to, and in support of the following activities are eligible for MSP capital funding, where the activity is associated with an eligible asset defined in Schedule 3.

2.a) Construction and Development

 Engineering and architecture, including design, tender preparation and advertising, if part of an accepted construction project.

 Construction supervision. Where capital projects are constructed or developed using municipal staff, all labour costs, including benefits, attributable to work carried out on and off the construction site, as follows:

o On-site costs: site supervision; operating, leasing, maintenance, and insurance costs attributable to municipal construction equipment used at the construction site; and equipment mobilization and demobilization costs.

o Off-site costs: staff and space costs associated with off-site design and construction of project components that are subsequently installed on site; off-site construction supervision, material requisitioning and site monitoring; and off-site general project management including contract management, purchasing and procurement of materials and services, project scheduling, and budget monitoring.

 Where capital projects are constructed or developed using construction equipment that is owned or leased by the municipality, the following costs are eligible:

o costs of locating the equipment at and removing the equipment from the construction site (mobilization and demobilization).

o all operating, leasing, maintenance, and insurance costs attributable to the use of the construction equipment at the construction site.

 Restoration of grass standard landscaping in areas disturbed by construction or reconstruction of infrastructure facilities.

16 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 96

2.b) Betterment The enhancement of the service potential of a capital asset (including land) that results in an increase in physical output or service capacity, lowering of associated operating costs, extension of the useful life, or improvement in the quality of output, including:

 Land betterment (i.e. rehabilitation, reclamation, and remediation) on land owned by a municipality or eligible entity, where the land is intended for a specific, eligible capital asset; or the betterment activities are intended to address/mitigate health and safety concerns (with or without a resulting capital asset).

 Significant enhancements or improvements for the safety of users of transportation or other municipal infrastructure system.

 Energy efficiency upgrades.

2.c) Rehabilitation The complete replacement or rebuilding of a major component of a capital asset (including land) to extend its useful life beyond the original expected or design life. Project examples include:

 Repaving or re-gravelling a road surface.

 Replacing or re-lining a section of water or wastewater line between logical system nodes or intersections.

 Replacing the roof or the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system of a building.

 Substantial reconstruction of the interior of a building.

2.d) Non-routine Maintenance Any non-routine, but recurring activity necessary to ensure that an asset reaches its normal design life and/or retains an acceptable appearance throughout its life, such as:

 Painting or refinishing of building components.

 Repair or replacement of individual parts of an infrastructure asset’s major components or systems, such as repairing cracks and holes in a road, repairing or replacing sections of water or wastewater lines, replacing the compressor in a building’s air conditioning system.

 Aggregate loss activities such as dust abatement, or sealant application.

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 17 Classification: Public 97

2.e) Other  Relocation and adjustment of associated utilities, including gas and electric utilities.

 Communications and project recognition costs for MSP-funded projects required to meet GOA signage guidelines.

 Other capital infrastructure costs as may be deemed appropriate by Municipal Affairs.

Schedule 3: Eligible Capital Project Assets Costs directly related to, and in support of the following assets are eligible for MSP capital funding, where the asset is associated with an eligible activity defined in Schedule 2.

The Minister will assess all projects against the program objectives and eligibility criteria when reviewing project applications. Regardless of the examples below, final decisions on project eligibility are at the Minister’s sole discretion.

3.a) Municipal Roadways, Bridges, and Related Facilities and Equipment

 Roadways, bridges, and related structures [including costs associated with aggregate purchase, abatement, hauling, crushing and storage (pit or facility), and the application of new gravel to roadways and/or non-routine re-grading of existing gravel back onto roadways]

 Railway or Light Rail Transit (LRT) grade separations and roadway crossings

 Other ancillary works such as sidewalks, commuter bikeways, lighting and energy efficient retrofitting, traffic control signals, pedestrian signals, storm drainage, and utility relocations

 Traffic management projects such as major intersection improvements, major traffic signal coordination, etc.

 Noise attenuation devices as a part of a qualifying project, and rehabilitation of existing noise attenuation devices on qualifying roadways or transit ways, consistent with the municipality’s noise attenuation policy

 Pedestrian trail systems along roadways

18 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 98

 Parking facilities

 Snow dump sites and snow storage facilities

3.b) Public Transit Facilities  LRT lines, station structures, park and ride facilities, and LRT maintenance facilities. LRT lines must be designated in the municipality’s transportation system bylaw

 Major public transit terminals and transit garages

 Comprehensive transit-stop retrofit programs to achieve a "barrier free path of travel" to accessible transit services

 System-wide capital transit improvement or betterment projects

 Major capital transit security devices, communication equipment, and other public safety enhancements

3.c) Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution Systems  Raw-water supply lines and storage facilities (reservoirs)

 Water treatment facilities

 Water quality management and monitoring systems (e.g. SCADA system), if part of a larger project

 Water pumping facilities

 Treated-water supply lines, storage facilities and related works

 Water distribution system extensions, betterment, and replacements, including individual services to the property line

3.d) Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems  Wastewater collection system extensions, betterment, and replacements, including service mains to the property line

 Wastewater pumping facilities and lift stations

 Wastewater lines from the collection system to the wastewater treatment facilities

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 19 Classification: Public 99

 Wastewater treatment facilities

 Outfall wastewater lines from wastewater treatment facilities to the point of discharge or disposal and related works

3.e) Storm Water Drainage Systems and Facilities

 Storm water ditches and major relocation of existing storm water ditches

 Storm water or waterway flooding containment structures

 Storm water collection lines including service lines, and catch basins

 Storm water retention ponds and treatment facilities

 Outfall storm water to the point of discharge or disposal and related works

3.f) Solid Waste Management Facilities and Equipment  Waste collection depots

 Recycling and material recovery facilities

 Organics management systems

 Thermal treatment systems

 Waste disposal landfills

3.g) Police, Fire and Emergency Services  Police stations

 Police training facilities

 Fire halls

 Fire training facilities

 Emergency operations centres

 Emergency vehicle storage and administration facilities

 Multi-service emergency response facilities

20 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 100

 Rural signage systems

 Ambulance stations

3.h) Disaster Mitigation  Infrastructure that reduces or eliminates long-term impacts and risks associated with natural disasters, for example:

o Infrastructure to manage and control flood water movement, including floodwalls and flood gates

o River stabilization infrastructure, including spurs, berms and ripraps

o Development of fire breaks

Note: excludes normal routine, maintenance and operational work (e.g., dredging of sediment, gravel removal, debris traps, etc.)

3.i) Regional and Community Airport Facilities and Equipment  Primary runway, cross-wind runways, secondary runways and taxiways, and runway extensions

 Aprons

 Primary taxiway from main/terminal apron to runway

 Airport buildings, including terminals and storage areas/sheds

 Development areas, access roads, fencing and drainage

 Lighting and navigation equipment

3.j) General Government and Administration  Public works facilities

 Maintenance equipment buildings

 Sand and salt storage sheds

 Animal control facilities and shelters

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 21 Classification: Public 101

 Fuel storage tanks

 Operational services buildings

 Telecommunication infrastructure (e.g., fibre optic or copper cable, radio, cell towers, satellite links)

3.k) Public Health and Welfare  Daycare centres

 Seniors’ centres

 Family and community support facilities

 Youth centres

 Cemeteries

3.l) Parks, Recreation, Sports, and Other Community Facilities

 Recreational and sports facilities, including baseball diamonds, swimming pools, ski areas (except for those that serve professional or semi-professional sport facilities that are primarily commercial operations)

 Campground facilities

 Playgrounds and equipment

 Permanent park facilities

 Public wharves, docks, and piers

 Trail systems

 Other projects may be eligible at the Minister’s sole discretion.

3.m) Libraries  Library buildings

22 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 102

Schedule 4: Ineligible Capital Projects Activities The following activities whether related to, or in support of a capital asset are not eligible for MSP capital funding. See Schedule 2 for eligible capital project activities and Schedule 3 for eligible capital assets.

4.a) Acquisition  Purchase or replacement of vehicles and equipment including:

- Transit vehicles, LRT vehicles, "low-floor" standard buses, "low-floor" articulated buses, and accessible community public transit vehicles

- Solid waste and recycling collection container systems, Waste transfer vehicles, landfill compactors, loaders, and material handlers

- Fixed central communications and computerized information management hardware and software that is integral to the delivery of police services, Peace officer vehicles, Police vehicles under municipal jurisdiction

- Specialized firefighting and rescue vehicles, specialized firefighting and rescue protective equipment, and fixed central communications and computerized information management hardware and software that is integral to the delivery of fire services

- Emergency response telephone systems, portable emergency power generators, and fixed central communications and computerized information management hardware and software that is integral to the delivery of emergency services

- Ground ambulances, as well as basic on-board equipment necessary for vehicle functionality

- Fixed central communications and computerized information management hardware and software that is integral to the delivery of ambulance services

 Purchase or replacement of heavy equipment

 Purchase or replacement of ancillary or small equipment used to provide services in connection with an infrastructure asset, such as appliances, furniture, remote data access terminals, meter reading devices, radios, equipment location devices, and geographic positioning systems

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 23 Classification: Public 103

 Purchase or replacement of cars and other fleet vehicles

 Purchase of land and rights-of-way, and any associated legal and survey fees

4.b) Functional Planning, Studies, and Infrastructure Management Systems

 Functional plans, studies, and system-wide reviews that directly relate to capital infrastructure

 Infrastructure management systems capable of recording and retrieving information on various types of infrastructure, including key infrastructure characteristics and condition, on a consistent basis to assist systematic infrastructure planning and management, and collection and input of data

4.c) General Government and Administration  Construction, betterment, rehabilitation and non-routine maintenance of municipal halls or administrative buildings

 General municipal administration activities

 Planning expenditures not directly related to specific capital infrastructure

 Public relations, stakeholder relations, partnership and governance development, communication/media services, and grant funding application and reporting activities

 Management of programs to monitor/maintain existing facilities and components of facilities

4.d) Operating Support

 Routine maintenance, including any routinely scheduled, recurring, or superficial activity necessary to ensure that an asset reaches its normal design life and/or retains an acceptable appearance throughout its life, such as:

- vehicle servicing or oil changes

- snow sweeping/removal (including provincial highways)

- cleaning of buildings or facilities

- the operation of facility mechanical systems

 IT software purchases i.e. Muniware

24 Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines Classification: Public 104

 Goods and Services Tax (GST)

 Depreciation or amortization

 Loan Fees

 Operating costs

4.e) Other

 Land betterment (i.e., rehabilitation, reclamation, remediation) where the land is intended for resale

 Land betterment where the land is not intended for a specific eligible capital asset, nor is the land being bettered to mitigate/address health and safety concerns

 Constructing or developing subdivisions, except for some typical subdivision development costs, such as road and sidewalk construction, water and wastewater lines to the property lines, and purchase of transportation and utility corridor rights-of-way

 Project costs structured to be financed by an established, long-term funding strategy (e.g. Off-site or Community Revitalization levies)

 Borrowing costs

 Water license costs

 Costs funded under other grant programs

 Beautification and cosmetic activities, including fixed permanent artistic components of buildings and facilities, community welcome signs, and decorative lighting

 Professional or semi-professional sport facilities that are primarily commercial operations, such as those that serve major junior hockey leagues

 Relocation and adjustment of associated utilities, including gas and electric utilities

 Projects previously submitted under the MSI or GTF

 Projects that will create new operational funding requirements for the province

 Projects that will require dedicated operational funding from the province

Municipal Stimulus Program | Program Guidelines 25 Classification: Public 105

Municipal Stimulus Program (MSP) Allocations

The allocated amounts represent the maximum funding available to municipalities through the MSP. Municipalities must commit their funding allocation to project(s) by October 1, 2020, or risk losing access to their allocation. Municipalities must also spend all allocated funding on accepted project(s) by December 31, 2021.

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

Total $500,000,000

Cities AIRDRIE $8,387,879 BEAUMONT $2,286,566 BROOKS $1,717,777 CALGARY $152,831,311 CAMROSE $2,227,845 $2,464,394 COLD LAKE $1,778,401 EDMONTON $115,567,274 $3,202,571 $8,212,428 LACOMBE $1,662,384 LEDUC $3,926,484 $12,063,074 $2,335,183 $7,519,659 RED DEER $12,006,017 $4,251,472 ST. ALBERT $7,855,108 $1,504,288 Towns ATHABASCA $352,447 BANFF $1,054,963 BARRHEAD $544,302 BASHAW $98,661 BASSANO $143,356 $293,012 BENTLEY $128,141 BLACK DIAMOND $320,947 $1,203,550 BON ACCORD $181,751 $763,377 $242,850 BOWDEN $147,398 $165,822 CALMAR $264,840 CANMORE $1,663,216

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 1/ 8 106

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

CARDSTON $464,659 CARSTAIRS $484,629 CASTOR $110,429 $449,325 COALDALE $1,033,091 $330,932 COCHRANE $3,480,131 CORONATION $111,737 CROSSFIELD $401,421 $97,948 DEVON $781,921 DIDSBURY $626,202 $860,018 $948,813 $138,245 EDSON $1,000,165 ELK POINT $172,598 FAIRVIEW $356,370 FALHER $124,456 $352,685 FOX CREEK $307,752 GIBBONS $375,507 GRIMSHAW $323,086 HANNA $304,186 $65,853 $474,525 $304,780 $1,670,349 HINTON $1,174,664 INNISFAIL $932,766 $144,545 KILLAM $117,562 LAMONT $210,874 LEGAL $159,879 $289,446 MANNING $140,622 $156,907 MCLENNAN $94,025 MILK RIVER $98,305 MILLET $231,200 MORINVILLE $1,175,972 $101,276 NANTON $259,254 $151,915 $3,447,442 OLDS $1,091,694 $122,316

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 2/ 8 107

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

OYEN $121,484 PEACE RIVER $813,302 $423,531 $215,153 $432,921 PONOKA $859,305 PROVOST $237,500 RAINBOW LAKE $94,501 RAYMOND $504,124 REDCLIFF $665,667 REDWATER $244,038 $305,137 $788,696 SEDGEWICK $96,403 SEXSMITH $311,437 $790,598 $114,590 SPIRIT RIVER $118,275 ST. PAUL $708,816 $64,308 STETTLER $707,509 STONY PLAIN $2,120,862 STRATHMORE $1,608,061 $324,394 $154,649 SYLVAN LAKE $1,761,165 TABER $1,001,829 THORSBY $120,652 $381,808 $247,367 TROCHU $125,764 $304,186 TWO HILLS $171,528 VALLEYVIEW $221,453 VAUXHALL $145,258 $678,505 VERMILION $493,307 VIKING $128,735 VULCAN $227,872 WAINWRIGHT $745,309 WEMBLEY $180,206 $606,351 $1,212,940 Villages ACME $77,622 ALBERTA BEACH $121,009 ALIX $87,250

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 3/ 8 108

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

ALLIANCE $50,000 AMISK $50,000 ANDREW $50,519 ARROWWOOD $50,000 BARNWELL $112,569 BARONS $50,000 BAWLF $50,163 BEISEKER $97,354 BERWYN $63,952 BIG VALLEY $50,000 BITTERN LAKE $50,000 BOYLE $109,954 BRETON $68,231 CARBON $59,435 CARMANGAY $50,000 CAROLINE $60,861 CEREAL $50,000 CHAMPION $50,000 CHAUVIN $50,000 CHIPMAN $50,000 CLIVE $84,991 CLYDE $51,114 CONSORT $86,656 COUTTS $50,000 COWLEY $50,000 CREMONA $52,778 CZAR $50,000 DELBURNE $106,031 DELIA $50,000 DEWBERRY $50,000 DONALDA $50,000 DONNELLY $50,000 DUCHESS $128,973 EDBERG $50,000 EDGERTON $50,519 ELNORA $50,000 EMPRESS $50,000 FOREMOST $64,308 FORESTBURG $104,010 $50,000 GLENDON $58,602 GLENWOOD $50,000 HALKIRK $50,000 HAY LAKES $58,840 HEISLER $50,000 HILL SPRING $50,000 HINES CREEK $50,000

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 4/ 8 109

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

HOLDEN $50,000 HUGHENDEN $50,000 HUSSAR $50,000 HYTHE $98,305 INNISFREE $50,000 IRMA $61,931 KITSCOTY $116,016 LINDEN $98,424 LOMOND $50,000 LONGVIEW $50,000 LOUGHEED $50,000 MANNVILLE $98,424 MARWAYNE $72,035 MILO $50,000 MORRIN $50,000 MUNSON $50,000 MYRNAM $50,000 NAMPA $50,000 PARADISE VALLEY $50,000 ROCKYFORD $50,000 ROSALIND $50,000 ROSEMARY $50,000 RYCROFT $72,748 RYLEY $57,414 SPRING LAKE $83,090 STANDARD $50,000 STIRLING $150,845 VETERAN $50,000 VILNA $50,000 WABAMUN $81,069 WARBURG $91,054 WARNER $50,000 WASKATENAU $50,000 YOUNGSTOWN $50,000 Summer Villages ARGENTIA BEACH $8,209 BETULA BEACH $6,902 BIRCH COVE $10,349 BIRCHCLIFF $18,908 BONDISS $18,076 BONNYVILLE BEACH $14,985 BURNSTICK LAKE $6,783 CASTLE ISLAND $6,189 CRYSTAL SPRINGS $11,062 GHOST LAKE $14,747 GOLDEN DAYS $24,019 GRANDVIEW $18,551

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 5/ 8 110

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

GULL LAKE $25,921 HALF MOON BAY $9,993 HORSESHOE BAY $13,677 ISLAND LAKE $32,102 ISLAND LAKE SOUTH $12,251 ITASKA BEACH $7,734 JARVIS BAY $30,319 KAPASIWIN $6,189 LAKEVIEW $8,566 LARKSPUR $10,230 MA-ME-O BEACH $18,076 MEWATHA BEACH $15,698 NAKAMUN PARK $16,411 NORGLENWOLD $37,451 NORRIS BEACH $9,517 PARKLAND BEACH $23,187 PELICAN NARROWS $22,949 POINT ALISON $6,189 POPLAR BAY $17,244 ROCHON SANDS $15,223 ROSS HAVEN $24,019 SANDY BEACH $38,046 SEBA BEACH $25,089 SILVER BEACH $12,726 SILVER SANDS $24,019 SOUTH BAPTISTE $12,845 SOUTH VIEW $12,964 SUNBREAKER COVE $14,628 SUNDANCE BEACH $13,677 SUNRISE BEACH $21,047 SUNSET BEACH $10,825 SUNSET POINT $25,089 VAL QUENTIN $34,955 WAIPAROUS $10,825 WEST BAPTISTE $9,517 WEST COVE $22,711 WHISPERING HILLS $21,879 WHITE SANDS $19,264 YELLOWSTONE $21,285 Municipal Districts and Counties ACADIA NO. 34, M.D. OF $58,602 ATHABASCA COUNTY $935,381 BARRHEAD NO. 11, COUNTY OF $747,449 BEAVER COUNTY $701,922 BIG LAKES COUNTY $487,720 BIGHORN NO. 8, M.D. OF $158,571 BIRCH HILLS COUNTY $184,604

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 6/ 8 111

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

BONNYVILLE NO. 87, M.D. OF $1,516,770 BRAZEAU COUNTY $923,732 CAMROSE COUNTY $1,029,406 COUNTY $532,652 CLEAR HILLS COUNTY $359,341 CLEARWATER COUNTY $1,420,129 CYPRESS COUNTY $910,775 FAIRVIEW NO. 136, M.D. OF $190,666 FLAGSTAFF COUNTY $444,333 FOOTHILLS COUNTY $2,706,174 FORTY MILE NO. 8, COUNTY OF $425,670 GRANDE PRAIRIE NO. 1, COUNTY OF $2,674,793 GREENVIEW NO. 16, M.D. OF $1,142,926 KNEEHILL COUNTY $594,464 LACOMBE COUNTY $1,229,463 LAC STE. ANNE COUNTY $1,295,554 LAMONT COUNTY $463,471 LEDUC COUNTY $1,638,016 LESSER SLAVE RIVER NO. 124, M.D. OF $334,141 LETHBRIDGE COUNTY $1,230,652 MINBURN NO. 27, COUNTY OF $378,955 MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY $1,554,095 NEWELL, COUNTY OF $894,371 NORTHERN LIGHTS, COUNTY OF $434,585 NORTHERN SUNRISE COUNTY $224,781 OPPORTUNITY NO. 17, M.D. OF $378,123 PAINTEARTH NO. 18, COUNTY OF $249,863 PARKLAND COUNTY $3,815,342 PEACE NO. 135, M.D. OF $207,664 PINCHER CREEK NO. 9, M.D. OF $352,447 PONOKA COUNTY $1,165,630 PROVOST NO. 52, M.D. OF $262,106 RANCHLAND NO. 66, M.D. OF $50,000 RED DEER COUNTY $2,322,821 ROCKY VIEW COUNTY $4,684,275 SADDLE HILLS COUNTY $264,484 SMOKY LAKE COUNTY $292,537 NO. 130, M.D. OF $240,472 SPIRIT RIVER NO. 133, M.D. OF $83,208 ST. PAUL NO. 19, COUNTY OF $768,845 STARLAND COUNTY $245,584 STETTLER NO. 6, COUNTY OF $661,625 STURGEON COUNTY $2,437,530 TABER, M.D. OF $852,648 THORHILD COUNTY $386,800 TWO HILLS NO. 21, COUNTY OF $432,802 VERMILION RIVER, COUNTY OF $982,691

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 7/ 8 112

Municipality Allocated MSP Funding

VULCAN COUNTY $473,574 WAINWRIGHT NO. 61, M.D. OF $532,415 WARNER NO. 5, COUNTY OF $469,176 WESTLOCK COUNTY $858,235 WETASKIWIN NO. 10, COUNTY OF $1,329,075 WHEATLAND COUNTY $1,044,622 WILLOW CREEK NO. 26, M.D. OF $663,884 WOODLANDS COUNTY $565,104 YELLOWHEAD COUNTY $1,306,966 I.D. NO. 04 (WATERTON) $60,980 I.D. NO. 09 (BANFF) $122,197 KANANASKIS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT $50,000 SPECIAL AREAS (2, 3 AND 4) $497,348 Specialized Municipalities CROWSNEST PASS, MUNICIPALITY OF $707,064 JASPER, MUNICIPALITY OF $545,609 LAC LA BICHE COUNTY $1,145,423 MACKENZIE COUNTY $1,487,290 STRATHCONA COUNTY $11,694,461 WOOD BUFFALO, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF $13,276,133 Metis Settlements BUFFALO LAKE $84,991 EAST PRAIRIE $69,657 ELIZABETH $76,552 FISHING LAKE $70,727 GIFT LAKE $106,031 KIKINO $121,009 PADDLE PRAIRIE $68,587 PEAVINE $71,916 Redwood Meadows REDWOOD MEADOWS $128,379

Notes: 1. MSP funding is allocated on a per capita basis, according to the 2019 Municipal Affairs Population List. Municipalities with smaller populations are allocated a minimum allocation of $50,000, with the exception of summer villages, which are allocated a base allocation of $5,000, in addition to the per capita amount.

2. In accordance with the Minister's discretion, Improvement District No. 12 (Jasper National Park), Improvement District No. 13 (Elk Island), Improvement District No. 24 (Wood Buffalo), Improvement District No. 25 (Willmore Wilderness), and Improvement District No. 349 have been excluded from the MSP funding allocation model.

July 2020

#Classification: Public Page 8/ 8 113 Municipal Stimulus Program Government Capital Project Application

Municipality Information Office Use Only Municipal Code Municipality Name

Contact Name

Telephone

Date

Please refer to the Municipal Stimulus Program (MSP) guidelines for more information to assist you in completing this application.

Submission This application form, program guidelines and additional program infonnation are available on the MSP website at https ://www alberta.ca/municipal-stimulus-program. aspx. Municipalities are required to commit to the conditions stated in the guidelines including red tape reduction efforts to incentivize new, job-creating private sector investment. • Applicants are permitted to submit a maximum of five projects for consideration. • Submit one application per project. The completed application form must be saved and emailed to ma.municipalstirnulus(ã/gov.ab.ca. • Electronic signatures will be accepted. • All application details must be completed before submitting the form. • Applicants are encouraged to save a copy of the completed form for their own records. • Project applications must be submitted by October 01st, 2020. Please note that this is the first intake deadline and late applications will not be accepted. • Municipalities must attest that the project will not result in municipal tax increases.

Submit the completed application form to:

Alberta Municipal Affairs Grant and Education Property Tax Branch Email: ma.municipalstimulus(ä/gov.ab.ca

If you have any questions, please call (780) 422-7125 or toll-free by first dialling 310-0000.

Legal Statement

The personal information you are providing on this form is being collected to support the administration of the Municipal Stimulus Program and is authorized under section 33(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy (FOIP) Act. The personal information will be managed in accordance with the privacy provisions of the FOIP Act. If your grant application is approved, your name, the grant program and the amount of the grant may be published on the Government of Alberta Grant Disclosure Portal as authorized under section 40(1)(b) and (f) of the FOIP Act. Should you have any questions concerning the collection of this information, please contact the Grants and Education Property Tax Branch at 780-422-7125 or by writing to the Grant Program Delivery Director, 15th Floor, Commerce Place, 10155 - 102nd Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 4L4.

Page 1 of 3 MA(2020/05) 114 Project Information

1. Project Name: 2. Project Description: Please provide sufficient details including specific asset, activities, major works and location that clearly demonstrate project eligibility (See Municipal Stimulus Program Guidelines).

3. Project Objectives: Please provide sufficient details to detenTlinealignment with the program objectives (See Municipal Stimulus Program Guidelines, section 2).

4. Estimated construction start date:______5. Estimated construction end date: 6. Please provide the type of capital project and associated details of the capital project. Functional Category of Project Resulting Capital Asset Quantity New Rehab Replace

. . DDE . ELILI . . DDE . . DDE 7. Will the project involve the use of municipal forces to carry out the project? (See MSP Capital Oo Funding Guidelines). If Yes, I certz:fythat there are no private forces available to carry out the project. O

8. Is the project a joint-project/multi-jurisdictional project? QYes QN0 If you have answered yes to question 8, please complete the table below.

8a.Identify each partner’s financial contribution to the municipal share of project cost. Total percentage must equal 100%. Municipality/Partner Name % of Total Project Cost

A 0.0%

B 0.0%

9. Would this project have gone ahead this year or next year in the absence of support through the OYes QNo MSP?

10. By checking this box I certify that any municipal expenses associated with this project, including any municipal capital contribution and any operating cost associated with the resulting asset, will not be funded through increases in municipal property taxes.

Page 2 of 3 MA(2020/05) 115

Financial Information 11. Provide project financial information below by year of anticipated budgeted expenditure (Fill in the blanks below.) 2020 2021 Total Total Project Cost $0.00

Ineligible Cost (see Guidelines — Schedule 4) $0.00

Project Cost To Be Funded By Other Sources (This may Include finding $0 00 from municipal sources, partners, or other anticipated revenue.)

Eligible Project Cost To Be Funded From MSP $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Certification

This form must be completed by the Chief Administrative Officer or Duly-Authorized Signing Officer.

Signature of Chief Administrative Officer Print Name

Date of Signattire Telephone Number (include area code)

I certify that the information contained in this Project Profile is correct, that these expenses have not been deemed eligible under any other Program, and that the allocated grant amount will be applied in the year and manner described above once this Project Profile has been accepted by the Minister.

Page 3 of 3 MA(2020/05) 116

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC 2020 Municipal Census Report September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Melodie Steele, Legislative Officer ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Municipal Census Report PREPARED BY: Melodie Steele, Legislative Officer

CLEARANCES: Brad White, Acting CAO RELEVANT BYLAWS / POLICIES / LEGISLATION: • Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, Chapter M-26 – s. 57 • MGA – Determination of Population Regulation, Alberta Regulation 198/2017 (Subsequently Repealed on Regulation 152/2020, August 4, 2020)

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council accept the 2020 Municipal Census Report as information.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the February 11, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved the following motions: 1. That Council proceed with a population count in 2020. 2. That Council approve April 1, 2020, as Census Day in Morinville. 3. That Council appoint Ms. Melodie Steele as the Census Coordinator for the Census 2020 project.

Council approved the Census 2020 operational project in the 2020 Operating Budget.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY:

Municipalities conduct a Census to obtain a current, reliable population count which enables informed decision making about delivery of services, not only for the town of Morinville, but also for other local governments like Greater St. Albert Catholic Schools and Sturgeon Public Schools.

April 1, 2020, was chosen as Morinville’s Census date. Morinville used a “hybrid” system combining online and wireless census methods. A letter was circulated to all dwellings in Morinville containing a unique identifier personal identification number along with a link to the census database.

In late March, 2020, the impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and resulting public health restrictions changed the project plan, placing greater emphasis on online data collection. As the situation evolved throughout the project, the primary focus was to collect the most accurate population count.

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______M. Steele September 16, 2020 B. White September 16, 2020 Legislative Officer ACAO 117

The attached report outlines the challenges presented by the global pandemic, the extraordinary steps taken by Administration to complete the project, and details the key findings.

Census Report Highlights: • As of Census Day, April 1, 2020, Morinville’s population is 10,578, which represents an increase of 685 residents (6.92% growth) over the last Census conducted in 2016 • On Census Day there were 3894 dwelling units in Morinville. • 56.4% of dwellings completed the Census online – this is believed to be a record online completion rate, according to a census subject-matter expert at Alberta Municipal Affairs. • Morinville was perhaps the only, or one of very few municipalities who completed a municipal census project during a global pandemic. • The small but mighty Census team only began door to door enumeration on June 19, following the Province of Alberta’s announcement of Stage 2 in the COVID-19 Relaunch Plan, and completed the project on July 12, 2020.

BUDGET/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS:

• The Census 2020 project was included in approved 2020 Operating Budget • The project was completed in a timely manner and on budget.

LINKAGE TO BUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Governance

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

Administration will: • share the 2020 Municipal Census Report with Greater St. Albert Catholic Schools and Sturgeon Public Schools; • update the Morinville website with the 2020 Report; • utilize the Census results in future planning activities.

118

MORINVILLE CENSUSCENSUS 20202020 Municipal Census Report everyoneeveryone countscounts 119 Preface

Thank you to all Morinville residents for taking part in Census 2020. The information collected is vital to our community, helps to paint the picture of who we are today and helps to inform where we are headed in the future. This has been an unprecedented year with the COVID-19 Pandemic impacting all areas of our lives. Morinville was one of very few, if not the only, municipality to conduct a census during a global pandemic. Given the unprecedented times, the focus of the project was to obtain an accurate official population count.

When Morinville Census 2020 launched on April 1, 2020 the planned end date MAYOR was June 30, 2020. With the challenging public health restrictions, the project TURNER was extended, and wrapped up July 12, 2020. CENSUS As we worked to keep everyone safe for the duration of the project, we relied heavily on collecting information online. We are happy to report that Morinville 2020 achieved a 56.4% online completion rate – a great response by any standard and believed to be a record online completion rate for Alberta municipalities! Door-to-door data collection was also impacted, with census workers completing the remaining data collection in the community between June 19 and July 12, 2020, after we moved into Stage 2 of Alberta’s Relaunch Strategy. The impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic affected the information collected during the project. Census Day (the specific day selected to serve as a snapshot view of our population count and demographic status), was April 1, 2020. This date landed firmly in the period where many industries were reducing their work forces. As a result, the answers provided to some of the demographic questions, particularly those surrounding employment status, are not a true or useful representation of the typical employment picture for Morinville residents. The census was a collaborative project between the Town of Morinville and our residents. We appreciate and celebrate everyone’s effort to bring the census to a successful completion.

Census During a Pandemic? How? The impacts of COVID-19 challenged the Census team to explore and implement innovative community engagement tools to encourage online participation. Road-side and neighbourhood signage, contactless door-hanger reminders and social media posts became more important to the success of the project than in previous years. Perhaps the most creative aspect was the animated video collection, first created for the Census project. Visit www.morinville.ca/census to see the video series. 120 Census 2020 - Everyone Counts

Between April 1 and July 12, 2020, the Town of Morinville undertook a municipal census to obtain an updated population count as well as key demographics instrumental in anticipating future needs of the municipality. As of April 1, 2020, Morinville’s population is 10,578 which represents an increase of 685 (+6.92%) residents over the 2016 official population. The total number of residential dwellings in 2020 is 3,894 with 3,789 occupied, 96 vacant, and 9 under construction. This is an increase of 249 dwellings since the 2016 Census. Data Collection The official start date of Morinville’s 2020 Municipal Census was April 1, 2020. Prior to Census Day, residents were mailed a letter containing a unique personal identification number that could be used to respond through a secure online portal. Residents were able to complete their census between April 1 and July 12, 2020 via one of three ways: • online using the secure database; • over the phone to a census administrator; or • at their home with an enumerator entering the responses. 56.4% of dwellings completed the census online. All detailed information contained within this report is based on data provided by residents during the enumerating process. Residents that chose not to respond to a question were included in the data as “Prefer not to Answer”. Neither the Town of Morinville, nor any of its employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information disclosed within this report.

At A Glance

Census Date April 1, 2020

Population 10,578

Dwelling Units 3,894

Population Change +6.92%

Dwelling Increase +6.4%

Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 1 121

Population Comparison

10,578 2020

9,893 2016

9,402 2014

2 Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 122 Who We Are – 2020

916 891

814 829

729 736 737

610 574 565 547 534

424 388 384 335 317

248 0-4 5-9 n/a 10-14 15-16 17-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-59 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 over75

6.9% 8.4% 7.7% 2.3% 3.0% 4.0% 5.4% 7.8% 8.7% 7.0% 5.2% 5.0% 5.8% 5.3% 3.6% 3.2% 3.7% 7.0%

The largest proportion of Morinville’s population is within the 35-39 age range (8.7%) followed by those between the ages of 5 and 9 (8.4%). Male Spirit -Man Other -binary 2- Female Woman - Trans No Answer No Non Trans

4,926 4,888 4 7 45 2 742

Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 3 123 Where We Live - 2020

2020 Dwellings 3,894

2016 Dwellings 3,645

Increase 249 (6.4%)

Dwelling counts include occupied, vacant and under construction dwellings.

Dwelling Type Number %

Single Detached Homes 2,774 71.2%

Suite in Single Detached Home 16 0.4%

2, 3, 4, 5, 6-plexes 300 7.7%

Row (town) House 284 7.3%

Apartments 408 10.5%

Manufactured Homes 103 2.6%

Other 9 0.2%

TOTAL 3,894 100%

4 Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 124 Dwelling Types Dwelling Locations For census purposes, Morinville was broken into Morinville residents primarily live in single- 12 zones (see page 7 for map of zones). Of those detached homes (71.2%) with apartments zones, Zone 8 has the highest dwelling count at representing the second most occupied dwelling 510 (13.1%). Zone 2 and 3 were close behind with type at (10.5%). dwelling counts of 415 (10.7%) and 396 (10.2%), respectively.

Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 5 125

Zones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total

287 415 396 246 228 223 333 510 305 370 311 270 3,894 Count Total Dwelling Dwelling Total

7.4% 10.7% 10.2% 6.3% 5.9% 5.7% 8.6% 13.1% 7.8% 9.5% 8.0% 6.9% 100.0% Total % Total of Town of Town Dwellings

283 408 389 240 222 216 311 497 301 368 303 251 3,789 Occupied Occupied Dwellings

248 348 342 174 194 154 170 391 257 332 259 48 2,917 # Owned

87.6% 85.3% 87.9% 72.5% 87.4% 71.3% 54.7% 78.7% 85.4% 90.2% 85.5% 19.1% 77.0% % Owned

18 40 30 57 25 54 131 82 25 20 33 145 660 # Rented

6.4% 9.8% 7.7% 23.8% 11.3% 25.0% 42.1% 16.5% 8.3% 5.4% 10.9% 57.8% 17.4% % Rented

17 20 17 9 3 8 10 24 19 16 11 58 212 # Unknown

6.0% 4.9% 4.4% 3.8% 1.4% 3.7% 3.2% 4.8% 6.3% 4.3% 3.6% 23.1% 5.6% % Unknown

6 Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 126

10 7 8 9 6 12 11 4 2 5 3

2020 Census Zones 1

Town of Morinville 2020 Municipal Census Report 7 127

MORINVILLE CENSUSCENSUS 20202020 everyoneeveryone countscounts

The Town of Morinville conducts a municipal census to determine the total population of our community. Census information is used for statistical purposes only. If you have any questions regarding the information collected or the data provided in this report please contact: Town of Morinville Legislative Officer 10125 100 Avenue Morinville, AB T8R 1L6 780-939-4361 [email protected] 128

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC Motions Pending September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Barry Turner, Mayor ATTACHMENTS:

PREPARED BY: Melodie Steele, Legislative Officer

CLEARANCES: Brad White, ACAO RELEVANT BYLAWS / POLICIES / LEGISLATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council consider the Motions Pending from the September 8, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council and the September 15, 2020, Committee of the Whole meeting.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the September 8, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council: Mayor B. Turner provided notice of the intention to bring forward the following motion to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council: “That Council direct Mayor Turner to extend an invitation to the Alexander Chief and Council to attend a joint event to begin the process of collaboratively building a relationship for the mutual-benefit of both communities.”

At the September 15, 2020 Committee of the Whole Meeting, Council approved the following motion: That Council refer the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees verbal presentation to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration.

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______M. Steele September 16, 2020 B. White September 16, 2020 Legislative Officer ACAO

129

Report to Council

For Council Decision For Council Direction For Council Information

TOPIC Commemorative Naming Policy September 22, 2020

PRESENTER: Danielle Craib, Permit & Licencing ATTACHMENTS: Officer • Commemorative Naming Policy (Redline) • Commemorative Naming Policy 53/2012 PREPARED BY: Danielle Craib, Permit & Licencing • Commemorative Naming Policy Presentation Officer

CLEARANCES: Brad White, Acting CAO RELEVANT BYLAWS / POLICIES / LEGISLATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council approve the Commemorative Naming Policy, as presented.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

At the September 15, 2020 Committee of the Whole Meeting, Council approved the following motion: “That Council refer the Commemorative Naming Policy to the September 22, 2020, Regular Meeting of Council for consideration.”

At the July 14, 2020 Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved the following motion: “That Council refer the Commemorative Naming Policy to the September 15, Committee of the Whole meeting.”

At the February 28, 2012, Regular Meeting of Council, Council approved the Commemorative Naming Policy 53/2012.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY:

Since 2005, (Policy 56-2005) the Town of Morinville has been commemorating past and present citizens whose scholarly, professional or public service contributions have played a significant role in the Town’s history through the naming of parks, streets, and facilities. In 2008, the Commemorative Naming Policy was revised to include the naming of neighbourhood districts.

The Commemorative Naming Committee has not met since 2009 and the master list of names has been updated with one name since then.

______Submitted by: Approved by:

______D. Craib September 15, 2020 B. White September 15, 2020 Permit & Licensing Officer ACAO

130

The approved naming list will provide Administration with a clear direction regarding approved names for future Morinville­owned facilities or lands. An internal naming vetting process will include correspondences externally to organizations like the Morinville Historical Society, Alexander First Nation, Canadian Forces Base (Edmonton), and regional municipalities for significance to the Morinville region.

On a bi-annual basis, Administration will present to Council any new potential names for the master list that can be publicly applied for or internally recommended for Council’s approval, which remains consistent to the same process as before under the previous policy.

These process revisions that are proposed are intended to streamline the commemorative naming process, while keeping the original nature of this policy intact. The proposed policy would eliminate the Commemorative Naming Committee, and designate Council the sole authority regarding commemorative naming. Administration would process and manage the “Master Naming List”.

This new process would be available to regional heritage societies, historical groups, and the public so they can contribute to the full process. Administration will set up a webpage that the public can suggest names and receive subscriptions of proposed applications and provide feedback to Administration. Any information, comments, considerations that are contributed from this subscription would be added to the information for Council’s review.

Administration has engaged Morinville groups that are involved with heritage and historical activities for their input into this proposed process. No objections have been received.

BUDGET/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS:

N/A

LINKAGE TO BUSINESS PLAN/STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

• Municipal Sustainability Plan o Governance Pillar - Accountable Leadership-“Municipal decision-making is transparent and accountable to the community and its long-term vision.” o Cultural Pillar - Celebrate Arts, Culture and Heritage -“Diverse arts, cultural and heritage venues and events are visible, celebrated and supported.” And Shared Identity “Backgrounds of residents become more diverse and continue to be respected and reflected in Morinville’s welcoming and inviting small town culture and identity.” • Morinville Historic & Cultural Heritage Policy o The Town will support activities that cultivate Morinville’s history and its cultural heritage by: ensuring history and cultural heritage are recognised for future development planning, Town operations and its communications. • Numbering of streets, parcels and buildings bylaw 9/2019

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

• With Council approval, Administration will update the website with the approved policy. • Administration to provide a bi-annual follow-up in the first Quarter of 2021, based on the policy.

131

Council Policy

Commemorative Naming

Policy Number: Approval Date: Supersedes Policy: 53/2012

SECTION A

1.0 Policy Purpose:

1.1 To provide clear guidance regarding Commemorative Naming of Morinville-owned Facilities, Districts or Land under its control and operation.

1.2 To provide a consistent evaluation framework and approval process when considering Commemorative Naming proposals for Morinville owned facilities or land under its control and operation.

1.3 To clearly identify the public process regarding Commemorative Naming of Morinville­ owned facilities and land under its control.

1.4 To preserve heritage in the community through Commemorative Naming of Morinville­ owned facilities or land under its control and operation.

1.5 To honour and recognize significant contributions to the community through public service, community volunteerism or outstanding achievement by individuals, groups of individuals or community organizations.

2.0 Scope

2.1 This Policy applies to all Morinville-owned facilities or land under its control and operation, including interior and exterior building components, streets, residential districts, parks, park features, outdoor recreation facilities and trails. 2.2 This policy does not apply to naming requests related to financial consideration or sponsorship.

132 Morinville Commemorative Naming Policy Council Policy Policy #: PED ####

3.0 Definitions

All definitions include the plural form of the terms. 3.1 "Applicant" means the civic department, non-profit tenant of a Morinville-owned facility, citizen, group of citizens, entity or organization which makes a formal request to Morinville via the CAO for the Commemorative Naming Rights to all or a portion of a facility, district or land. 3.2 "CAO" means the Chief Administrative Officer of Morinville, appointed by Council, or the Direct or(s) ofr Department(s) designated by the Chief Administrative Officer. 3.3 "Council" means the duly elected officers of Morinville and the Chief Elected Officer or Mayor. 3.4 "Commemorative Naming Committee" means an ad hoc committee comprising of the Deputy CAO, and Director s of each Civic Department in Morinville. 3.53.4 "Commemorative Naming Rights" means rights granted to honour outstanding achievement, distinctive service, or significant community contribution. Commemorative Naming will not be tied to financial contribution. 3.63.5 "District" means a collection of neighbourhoods that are determined by the CAO to comprise a residential district. 3.73.6 "Facility" means any property, complex, structure, building or portion thereof interior or exterior owned or controlled by Morinville. 3.83.7 "Land" means any street, park, park feature, or trail owned or controlled by Morinville. 3.93.8 "Naming Entity" means the entity (i.e.: community organization or individual) to whom Naming Rights are grant ed. 3.103.9 "Morinville" means the Town of Morinville, in the Province of Alberta.

4.0 General Principles

4.1 Commemorative Naming Rights may be granted under the terms and conditions outlined in this Policy in recognition of individuals, groups of individuals, or community organizations which have made significant contribution to the community. 4.2 Established names of Facilities, Districts and Land contribute significantly to historic continuity, community identity and pride. 4.3 Commemorative Naming recognition will be compatible with the physical attributes of a location. 4.4 Any cost associated with the preparation and submission of the Commemorative Naming application will be the responsibility of the Applicant. 4.5 The authority to grant Commemorative Naming Rights rests with Council or their designate. 4.6 In multi-tenanted buildings, proposals for Commemorative Naming of facilities or common 133 Morinville Commemorative Naming Policy Council Policy Policy #: PED ####

areas within the building will only be considered if all tenants support the proposal and their support is documented to Morinville's satisfaction. 5.0 Guidelines

5.1 Any civic department, non-profit tenant of a Morinville-owned facility, citizen, group of citizens, entity or organization may submit a Commemorative Naming proposal to the CAO or designate to name a facility, or a portion thereof, district or land after an individual, group of individuals, or community organization to honour and recognize significant contributions to the community through public service, community volunteerism or outstanding achievement. 5.2 There shall be no prioritization system of Commemorative Names. However, a Commemorative Name may be used only once for a Facility, District and Land (excluding streets). 5.3 The following considerations and guidelines will be used when reviewing Commemorative Naming submissions: • Person(s) may be alive or deceased; • Person(s), or members of their family lineage, need not be current residents of Morinville; • The person(s) may have historical significance to Morinville and its development; • The person (s) may have historical significance to the communities surrounding Morinville, including Alexander First Nation and Canadian Forces Base Edmonton. • The person(s) may have demonstrated excellence, courage, or exceptional service to Morinville, the Province of Alberta, or to Canada; • The person(s) may have achievements that were extraordinary in the scholastic, professional, or public service arenas; • The person(s) may have an extraordinary community service record; • The person(s) may have risked their life in extraordinary circumstances, or given his/her life to save or protect others; 5.4 The contributions of the individuals or group must be well documented and broadly acknowledged within the community. 5.5 If the name proposed to be bestowed is that of an elected official or civil servant, that person must be retired from public service to be eligible. 5.6 Written permission must may be obtained from the individual, group or organization who or which is being commemorated, or their legal representative, prior to consideration. 5.7 Commemorative Names which reflect or imply a reference to any of the following will not be eligible: • Elected officials currently in office; • Commemorative Names which do not meet the criteria outlined in this Policy; • Commemorative Names which are inconsistent with the mission, vision or values 134 Morinville Commemorative Naming Policy Council Policy Policy #: PED ####

of Morinville. 5.8 Proposals to commemoratively rename existing civic community Facilities, Districts or Land will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. Existing names will not be changed without consideration of: • The historical significance of the existing name; • The impact on the individual or organization associated with the existing name; and, • The cost and impact of changing existing signage, rebuilding community recognition and updating records;. • Is inconsistent with the mission, vision or values of Morinville. 5.9 The Commemorative Naming Committee shall be appointed by the CAO. 5.105.9 Morinville will endeavour to the extent reasonably practicable, to balance its responsibility to maintain transparent processes and provide full disclosure to the public, with its responsibility to maintain confidentiality regarding third party interests. 6.0 Application & Public Process

General 6.1 The Applicant will submit a Commemorative Naming proposal and application directly to the CAO or designate. 6.2 The CAO or designate may request additional reporting be prepared related to a Commemorative Naming proposal by the civic department responsible for the operation and/or maintenance of the Facility or Land. 6.3 For all Commemorative Naming requests, the Applicant shall submit a written proposal including at a minimum: • Documentation verifying that the person/organization being honoured in agreement with the proposal (if they are living), or by their legal representative should they be deceased; • Background information and/or biographical information demonstrating that the proposed name is of significance to the community; • Documentation including letters of support for the Commemorative Naming; and, • In the case of a multi-tenanted community facility, letters of support and approval from all other tenants or occupants of the civic community facility. 6.4 The CAO or designate will review the proposal to determine if it meets the intent of this Policy. 6.5 If the Proposal is found to be in compliance with this Policy, the CAO or designate will commence an internal review, including external consultation from applicable societies, organizations, and/or associations, to review the application’s significance and provide any supporting documentation.call the Committee (within 14 days) and instruct them to review the proposal and prepare a report for Council's consideration. 135 Morinville Commemorative Naming Policy Council Policy Policy #: PED ####

6.56.6 An internal review will include the consultation with all Civic Departments to provide any information to the applicant. 6.7 An application denied by Council may not be re-submitted by the Applicant or a third party for a period of six (6) months from the date of denial. 6.8 Administration, shall fully investigate the proposal, and shall consider compliance with this Policy and any other relevant factor. the Committee deems relevant 6.66.9 Administration will provide Council with a completed list and any new applications with review findings on a bi-annual basis, or otherwise directed by Council. Commemorative Naming Committee 6.7 The Commemorative Naming Committee shall comprise of the Deputy CAO and the Directors of each Civic Department in Morinville. 6.8 A 3-person quorum is required for any meeting of the Commemorative Naming Committee. 6.96.10 When considering the naming of a Facility, District or Land, the Commemorative Naming Committee Administration shall hold at least one advertised public meeting at a Regular Meeting of Council to hear public input with respect to the proposal. 6.106.11 A notice of intent to consider a Commemorative Name shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation, the Morinville's website and/or other accessible mediameet the Advertising Bylaw requirements. The notice shall indicate the location of the Facility, District or Land, any historical significance of the property or facility, and inform the public of the time, date and place of the public meeting. 6.116.12 The Commemorative Naming CommitteeAdministration shall consider all public input, both in support of and in opposition to the proposal when preparing the report and recommendation for Council. 6.12 The scope of public engagement will be commensurate with the size and scope of the proposal. Effort should be made to provide equal opportunity for both proponents and opponents of the proposal to speak to the proposal. Where they exist, Community Leagues should be invited to provide comment on proposals that directly affect them. 6.13 Prior to making a final recommendation, the Commemorative Naming Committee shall fully investigate the proposal, and shall consider compliance with this Policy and any other factor the Committee deems relevant. 6.14 The Commemorative Naming Committee shall complete its review process and make recommendation to Council within 90 days of its establishment by the CAO, and disband when Council action is taken to accept or reject the recommendation of the Committee. 6.15 The CAO will present the Commemorative Naming Committee's report to Council in a public forum. 6.13 Council may consider the recommendation report from the CommitteeAdministration which may include supporting documentation such as civic department reports, applicant's submission, and public input prior to making its decision.

136 Morinville Commemorative Naming Policy Council Policy Policy #: PED ####

7.0 Expiry Date

The Commemorative Naming Policy will be reviewed in 2015 in accordance with the policy review schedule. • For the purpose of ensuring that this policy is revised for ongoing relevancy and necessity, a review will occur prior to December 31, 2022. The policy shall be brought forth and accepted in its present or amended form or rescinded. • This policy shall remain in effect if the review date passes prior to formal review.

SECTION B

1.0 Reference to other Policy and Legislation

• Historic & Cultural Heritage Policy • Numbering of sStreets, pParcels and Bbuildings Bbylaw 9/2019 2.0 Persons Affected

• Deputy CAO • DepartmentDivision Heads 3.0 Review/Revision History and Author

• Rescinded - Commemorative Naming Policy No. 53/2012

Mayor

Chief Administrative Officer

137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144

Commemorative Naming Policy Regular Meeting of Council – September 22, 2020 www.morinville.ca Previous CouncilAction Naming PolicyNaming 53/2012. approvedCommemorative Council the 2012, 28, February On September 15, Committee meeting.”Whole the of Council refer“That the Commemorative PolicyNaming to the following motion: the At 14, July the consideration.” forCouncil of Regular2020, Meeting 22, September Council refer“That the Commemorative PolicyNaming to the approvedCouncil following motion: the Atthe September 15, presented. ThatapproveCouncil the Commemorative Policy,Naming as Recommendation 2020, Regular MeetingCouncil, of Council approved 2020, Committee of the Whole Meeting, Meeting, Committee the Whole of 145 www.morinville.ca • • • • incl 2008,InCommemorative the Naming Policy was revisedto parks, streets, and facilities. significant roleTown’sthe in history through ofnaming the professional contributions service or public have played a commemorating past present and citizens whose scholarly, (Policy 56- 2005, Since Background Summary Current State 2009. CommemorativeThe Committeesince Namingmet not has sinc The masterThe list updated hasbeen of names with one name ude the naming of neighbourhood districts.neighbourhood ofnaming the ude e then e . 200 5) the Town5) the of Morinville hasbeen 146 www.morinville.ca • • • • • • Proposed Process he Administration engaged has Morinvillegroups that are involved with process. No objections have been received. lands. lands. Administrationto present to Council on a bi pro Webpage where public can suggest names. receive subscriptions and any new potentialfornames master the list. and t historical groups, regional process toInclusive heritage societies, include municipalities. regional and Base, Mor Internalvetting process and external correspondences including the reg Approved providelist will naming direction Administration clear with rit arding arding commemorative for names Morinville v age and historical activities for their input forintoinput proposed this and age historicaltheir activities i idecomments/feedback toAdministration and inform Council. nvilleHistorical Society, AlexanderFirst Nation, ForcesCanadian he public. 147 - ann - u owned facilities or or facilitiesowned al basis foral basis approval www.morinville.ca • • Follow Quarter 2021,of onpolicy. based the Administration web approval,Council With Administration update the will site approvedthe with policy. - Up Action to pr ovide bi a 148 - annual follow - up in the first the in up 149 150 151 2nd Annual MILITARY FAMILY APPRECIATION DAY September 18th, 2020

Who? Together We Stand Foundation (TWS) is a unique Canadian organization established to honour, show appreciation, and provide recognition for the tremendously important, but often forgotten, families of the Canadian Armed Forces.

“Military families are the What? Canadian Armed Forces’ Working closely with Members of centre of gravity.” Parliament from every Federal - Lieutenant General (Ret’d) Alain J. Parent, CMM, CD. political party, TWS established a nationally recognized day to honour Canadian military families. The third Friday in September is now known as Why? Military Family Appreciation Day The goal of MFAD is to (MFAD) across the country. This raise awareness of the year, due to COVID restrictions, challenges, to recognize TWS is encouraging Canadians the resiliency and to thank to pay tribute to military families military families for their online by participating in a digital sacrifices, as they support campaign giving thanks. their loved ones serving in the Canadian Armed Forces (regular and reserve force).

There is an evident connection between a steady home front and the unimpeded ability of the Canadian Armed Forces members to focus on their important missions. Simply put, their #HomeFort’s are the place of safety and security that military members return to when their work to protect the safety and security of Canada is done.

continue reading

MFAD 2020 | 1 152 2nd Annual MILITARY FAMILY APPRECIATION DAY September 18th, 2020

Their families take on all of the responsibilities of keeping these havens ready for their return. They cover everything at home willingly and without expectation of acknowledgment. They are just as much a part of the journey as the active member, but they do not wear the uniform. Our military families deserve our thanks and appreciation for shouldering these tasks alone while their military family members protect all Canadians. To participate, we are asking Canadians to build their own unique forts (ie. with pillows or books, in an office, under a table) with their families or colleagues to honour those who maintain life at their #HomeFort while their person is away. Using the hashtag #HomeFortChallenge post your video or photo to social media between September 1-18, 2020 making sure to challenge family and friends to do the same.

BuildSTEP Your Fort 1 TakeSTEP Video/Photo 2

Use whatever materials you have in your home or Document your fort! Take a photo or video in office. Be creative and get others involved. The key landscape mode (phone held sideways) is to have fun! using a flash or in a well-lit room.

PostSTEP to Social 3 SendSTEP to Together 4 We Stand

Share your photo or Once your video is finished please send it to TWS via video on social media one of the following methods, in addition to posting between September 1-18, it to your own social media campaigns using the 2020 using the hashtag hashtag #HomeFortChallenge.

#HomeFortChallenge and In these hard times, Canadians need to come together and #holddownthefort Submission options: challenge 2 or 3 others to do 1. Upload to our website at: the same! twsfoundation.ca/HomeFortChallenge I’m building a fort to thank military families for 2. Or by text to: 416-457-9114 keeping their home bases running smoothly while their loved ones are protecting our country! 3. Or via WeTransfer by: clicking this link I challenge (tag other accounts) to build a fort. Let’s show our military families how much they are appreciated for what they do for Canada. Learn more about Military Family Appreciation Day here: twsfoundation.ca/operations #HomeFortChallenge MFAD 2020 | 2

Classification:

Thank

cc: Travis financial

the

continued Minister Sincerely, a airport The

challenging

President and support.

to

catalyst Thank

possible Government including

It

I Dear

Morinville Mayor His

208 Innovation,

10125-

SEP

recognize

strong

is

Protected respond

Legislature

financial

Worship

vitally

will

Province

022020

Mr.

Toews

you

you

of

authority

Minister

Honourable

continue,

in

15602C-102 of

100

economic

financing

I

challenges,

Town

Mayor:

EIA,

of have

AB

viability

important

supporting

Finance

again for to

Building,

the

and

A

times

Treasury

Avenue

difficulties

Barry

continues

your

has

writing

stemming T8R

significant

had of

of

me

and

for with

Street,

Morinville

been

Jobs,

of

the solutions

10800-97th

Turner

July

recovery

1

Doug

weekly

regarding

that

taking

the

L6

airports

creative

to

jobs

Board

Province the

Grande

being to

30,

kept

the

Economy

Province.

from

airports

Schweitzer,

advocate

operational

Honourable

and

the

2020, discussions

Avenue,

Honourable

to

both

apprised and

Prairie,

in

faced

solutions

the

support

ensure

time

growth

Alberta.

is

remain

in correspondence

TREASURY COVID-19

Edmonton, considering

Alberta

and

by

Alberta

on to

MM,

and

of

for

EIA

write.

the

in

Chrystia

Innovation behalf will

Office

with

Doug

T8X Alberta

open

Alberta. the

Grande

financial

airport remains

Printed Alberta

be ALBERTA

BOARD and

0K7 the

of

pandemic.

Edmonton

of

needed and

on

all Schweitzer, the

153 Freeland, recycled

Prairie-Wapiti

across

Alberta’s

former Canada Capital

T5K possible

Minister authorities

AND

on

continue

viable. challenges paper

2B6

behalf to

FINANCE

Canada. federal

Telephone

I

Finance International

Canada

arrive

recognize

airports

to

financing

As

Minister

to

take

of

in

the

be

currently

Alberta.

our

at Finance 825-412-2050

Telephone

As

Authority’s

the

viable,

Province

an

for

government.

of

that

we

solutions

outcome

opportunity

additional

Airport

Jobs,

navigate Minister,

780-415-4855

being

EIA

in also

Fax

order

Economy,

efforts

is

(EIA).

TOWN

to

RECEIVED that

780-539-0628

faced

a

federal

faces

enable

through

vital

to

to

Bill

works

SEP

to

Fax I

emphasize

contribute

OF

am

by

Morneau,

economic

assess significant

780-415-4853

and

I

MORINVILLE

financial

the

airports,

pleased

12020

these for

51710

the all

ill to