DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Health Monitoring | S3/2020 | EBPH-Workshop Editorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Health Monitoring | S3/2020 | EBPH-Workshop Editorial Journal of Health Monitoring Evidence-based Public Health for Public Health Action – Proceedings of an international workshop at the RKI EDITORIAL Journal of Health Monitoring · 2020 5(S3) DOI 10.25646/6499 Providing actionable evidence in Public Health – The 2018 Robert Koch Institute, Berlin international workshop on evidence-based public health at the Christa Scheidt-Nave 1, Angela Fehr 2, Sebastian Haller 3, Giselle Sarganas 1, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Henriette Steppuhn 1, Julia Truthmann 4, Thomas Harder 3 A one-day international workshop entitled ‘Evidence- Table 2 (EVALUATION) – Which methods, skills, and 1 Robert Koch Institute, Berlin based Public Health for Public Health Action’ took place data does the RKI as a national public health institute need Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring 2 Robert Koch Institute, Berlin at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) in Berlin on Decem- to perform evaluations of public health interventions? Centre for International Health Protection ber 14, 2018. The workshop was organised by an inter- Table 3 (DISSEMINATION) – How can the RKI as a 3 Robert Koch Institute, Berlin disciplinary RKI public health research team and aimed national public health institute facilitate dissemination of Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology 4 Formerly Robert Koch Institute, Berlin to (1) provide insight into current concepts and method- results among public health stakeholders, and what could Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring ological challenges in evidence-based public health be important steps to enhance that (e.g. Cochrane Public (EBPH), and (2) identify next steps in enhancing collab- Health Research network, institutional repositories)? Corresponding author Dr Christa Scheidt-Nave orations on EBPH research and practice within the RKI The workshop was open to RKI staff from all units. A Robert Koch Institute and with external partners at the national and interna- total of 66 persons participated including invited speakers. Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring General-Pape-Straße 62–66 tional level. The workshop program is available on the publication server 12101 Berlin, Germany The workshop consisted of two parts. The first part com- of the RKI. E-mail: [email protected] prised a series of invited talks given by experts in the field Submitted: 15.01.2020 of EBPH from Germany and the United Kingdom (UK). The Part 1: Invited talks Accepted: 20.01.2020 second interactive part was devoted to group discussions. In their introductory presentations Mark Petticrew, Published: 04.06.2020 Applying the world café method, participants were asked Department of Social and Environmental Health Conflicts of interest to discuss approaches to strengthen EBPH at the RKI. Research at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical The authors declared no conflicts of interest. There was time for group discussions at three tables in two Medicine, and Eva A. Rehfuess, Institute for Medical Funding twenty minute rounds. Inspired by the public health action Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology at The workshop Evidence-based Public Health for Public cycle three key questions were assigned to the table hosts the Petten kofer School of Public Health, Ludwig Maxi- Health Action was funded by the Robert Koch Institute. in order to stimulate and guide discussions: milian University of Munich, outlined current concepts and methodological challenges in EBPH. In particular, Table 1 (ASSESSMENT) – Which tools/methods for sys- both speakers highlighted the fact that public health This work is licensed under a tematic evidence assessment does the RKI as a national interventions always imply changes in complex systems. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 public health institute need to identify and prioritize public With a special focus on public health interventions tar- International License. health topics? geting the prevention of non-communicable diseases, Journal of Health Monitoring 2020 5(S3) 3 Journal of Health Monitoring Evidence-based Public Health for Public Health Action – Proceedings of an international workshop at the RKI EDITORIAL Marc Petticrew emphasized the need to study not only Till Bärnighausen, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health what is easy to measure, e.g. individual health behaviour, (HIGH), University of Heidelberg, introduced innovative but also the upstream causes. These include personal, methods in population-based implementation and evalu- societal and economic context factors, such as health per- ation research including regression-discontinuity and ceptions or market forces. Understanding the complex fixed-effect models. He demonstrated that quasi-experi- determinants of non-communicable diseases is essential mental study designs play a key role in public health inter- to provide evidence for the implementation and evalua- vention research, in particular when conduct of RCTs is tion of effective public health interventions across very precluded for ethical and methodological reasons. If care- different contexts. Eva A. Rehfuess illustrated the impor- fully designed and appropriately applied to a specific tance of contextual factors by providing examples of inter- research question, quasi-experimental methods minimize ventions that proved to be beneficial in one context, but risk of bias and hence provide high level evidence regard- harmful in another. Thus, deriving evidence from rand- ing the effectiveness of public health measures. omized controlled trials (RCTs) may result in seriously Stefan Lhachimi, Institute for Public Health and Nurs- misleading results if contextual factors are not taken into ing Research (IPP), University of Bremen, discussed some account. Logic models can be used as a graphical tool for of the challenges specific to the conduct of systematic mapping contextual factors relevant to the design and reviews and meta-analyses on public health interventions. evaluation of public health interventions. Several concep- He emphasized the need for improving the quality of the tual frameworks are available to guide the process from evidence basis at the level of primary studies, in particular evidence synthesis to decision-making in public health. with regard to reducing risk of bias, standardizing defini- Kay Nolan, Centre for Guidelines at the National Insti- tions for outcomes and interventions, and considering that tute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in Manchester/ study results may greatly vary according to the specific UK, shared her expertise in EBPH guideline development. study contexts. He also discussed ongoing work to improve She illustrated two of the NICE core principles. First, given methods in synthesizing the evidence on public health the complexity of public health problems, it is inevitable to intervention, in order to ensure timely and actionable infor- systematically search for the best available evidence. This mation for health policy planning and implementation. requires considering information across the whole spec- Manfred Wildner, Department of Health in the Bavarian trum of evidence levels. Secondly, identifying evidence gaps Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, and and areas of uncertainty is a central part of NICE EBPH Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Ludwig Maximilian guideline recommendations. This will help to guide University of Munich, highlighted the need for a sustain- research priority setting, in order to continuously improve able translation network in EBPH. Based on his longstand- the evidence base. These principles have the potential to ing experience at the interface of public health policy, guide the next steps to strengthen EBPH at the RKI. research and practice, he emphasized that an ongoing, Journal of Health Monitoring 2020 5(S3) 4 Journal of Health Monitoring Evidence-based Public Health for Public Health Action – Proceedings of an international workshop at the RKI EDITORIAL structured and open discourse involving policy, research Table 1 (ASESSMENT) – Which tools/methods for sys- and practice should be guided by the shared responsibility tematic evidence assessment does the RKI as a national to provide the best available evidence to health policy mak- public health institute need to identify and prioritize public ing, to support implementation and evaluation research, health topics? and to inform the public. In addition to rating evidence in public health, future Thomas Harder, Department of Infectious Disease Epi- work should focus on health gap analyses and priority set- demiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, illustrated two ting, in order to generate the evidence that is presently examples of EBPH research and practice at the RKI. The most needed and actionable. This will also help to make RKI took the lead in the PRECEPT project (Project on a efficient use of time and personnel resources. Systematic Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health). In this approaches to health gap analyses including quantitative project, an international and multidisciplinary research as well as qualitative methods, such as discourse analysis team developed and successfully implemented a concep- may be necessary to achieve this goal. tual framework for rating evidence in public health with Table 2 (EVALUATION) – Which methods, skills, and focus on the prevention and control of communicable dis- data does the RKI as a national public health institute need eases. The project was funded by the European Center for to perform evaluations of public health interventions?
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Status Update on Measles and Rubella Elimination Germany
    Annual Status Update on Measles and Rubella Elimination Germany 1 Dear NVC and national technical counterparts, dear colleagues, We kindly ask you to follow the definitions (please see Annex 1.1) and instructions provided in this form, and to enter numbers or text as required in each segment (table, text box, other). If you are using your own definitions and indicators, please provide an explanation and clarification why and how these could be considered equivalent to or as an adequate replacement for the WHO definitions and indicators. If the NVC would like to provide additional data and information to the RVC, please submit them as separate document(s). In 2020, the World Health Organization reformed its IT systems and internet platforms for data submission and exchange in 2020 to increase security, and a new SharePoint for the European Regional Verification Commission for Measles and Rubella Elimination was created. However, due to shifting of resources and time constrains in countries and at the WHO Regional Office related to the COVID-19 pandemic response, it was not possible to prepare instructions and conduct training for NVCs and national colleagues. Therefore, we kindly request you to submit your ASU and all relevant additional documents as attachments to an e-mail to RVC Secretariat, using address [email protected]. You may also copy any of VPI technical officers cooperating with you in preparation of the ASU and verification process. Please follow up with us to confirm that we received your ASU and any other issue that may need our support or attention. This update is to be submitted to the WHO Regional Office for Europe by 1 May 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Health Monitoring | S3/2020 | EBPH-Workshop
    JUNE 2020 FEDERAL HEALTH REPORTING SPECIAL ISSUE 3 JOINT SERVICE BY RKI AND DESTATIS Journal of Health Monitoring Evidence-based Public Health for Public Health Action – Proceedings of an international workshop at the Robert Koch Institute Berlin, Germany, 14 December 2018 1 Journal of Health Monitoring Index 3 Editorial Providing actionable evidence in Public 23 Proceedings Summary of World Café Discussions Health – The 2018 international workshop on Table 3: Dissemination evidence-based public health at the Robert Koch Institute, Berlin 7 Proceedings Emerging challenges in evidence-based public health and how to address them 9 Proceedings Conceptual issues in relation to the design, implementation and evaluation of interven- tions 11 Proceedings Taking stock of existing evidence and closing evidence gaps – Reflections from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 13 Proceedings Novel methods for health intervention research 15 Proceedings Systematic reviews in public health: Exploring challenges and potential solutions 17 Proceedings Evidence-based public health (EBPH) health policy advising and information of the public 19 Proceedings Experiences from the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Robert Koch Institute 21 Proceedings Summary of World Café Discussions Table 1: Assessment 22 Proceedings Summary of World Café Discussions Table 2: Evaluation JournalJournal of of Health Health Monitoring Monitoring 2018 2020 3(XXX) 5(S3) 2 Journal of Health Monitoring Evidence-based Public Health for Public Health
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of a SARS-Cov-2 Variant Through Europe in the Summer of 2020
    Article Spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03677-y Emma B. Hodcroft1,2,3 ✉, Moira Zuber1, Sarah Nadeau2,4, Timothy G. Vaughan2,4, Katharine H. D. Crawford5,6,7, Christian L. Althaus3, Martina L. Reichmuth3, John E. Bowen8, Received: 25 November 2020 Alexandra C. Walls8, Davide Corti9, Jesse D. Bloom5,6,10, David Veesler8, David Mateo11, Accepted: 28 May 2021 Alberto Hernando11, Iñaki Comas12,13, Fernando González-Candelas13,14, SeqCOVID-SPAIN consortium*, Tanja Stadler2,4,92 & Richard A. Neher1,2,92 ✉ Published online: 7 June 2021 Check for updates Following its emergence in late 2019, the spread of SARS-CoV-21,2 has been tracked by phylogenetic analysis of viral genome sequences in unprecedented detail3–5. Although the virus spread globally in early 2020 before borders closed, intercontinental travel has since been greatly reduced. However, travel within Europe resumed in the summer of 2020. Here we report on a SARS-CoV-2 variant, 20E (EU1), that was identifed in Spain in early summer 2020 and subsequently spread across Europe. We fnd no evidence that this variant has increased transmissibility, but instead demonstrate how rising incidence in Spain, resumption of travel, and lack of efective screening and containment may explain the variant’s success. Despite travel restrictions, we estimate that 20E (EU1) was introduced hundreds of times to European countries by summertime travellers, which is likely to have undermined local eforts to minimize infection with SARS-CoV-2. Our results illustrate how a variant can rapidly become dominant even in the absence of a substantial transmission advantage in favourable epidemiological settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination Recommendations for Germany Miriam Wiese-Posselt, Christine Tertilt, and Fred Zepp
    MEDICINE CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION Vaccination Recommendations for Germany Miriam Wiese-Posselt, Christine Tertilt, and Fred Zepp SUMMARY accination is an effective means of preventing V infectious diseases (e1). The primary goal of vac- Background: Vaccination is an effective means of preventing cination is to protect the vaccinated person against the infectious diseases. In Germany, the Standing Vaccination disease in question (individual immunity). If a large Committee at the Robert Koch Institute (Ständige Impfkom- enough percentage of the population is vaccinated, then mission, STIKO) issues recommendations on vaccination to the spread of the pathogenic organism will be reduced prevent the occurrence and spread of infectious diseases in to such an extent that non-vaccinated persons are pro- the nation’s population. tected as well (herd immunity) (e2). Sustained vacci- Methods: Selective literature review, including consideration nation of a high percentage of the population against a of the current STIKO recommendations. pathogen for which man is the only reservoir can result Results: The annually updated vaccination calendar currently in its regional or even, in the ideal case, global elimi - includes recommendations for vaccination against diphtheria, nation (1). The total elimination of smallpox and the tetanus, pertussis, type b Haemophilus influenzae, hepatitis marked reduction of the incidence of poliomyelitis B, poliomyelitis, and pneumococci, beginning at the age of worldwide are impressive examples of the benefits of eight weeks. From the age of twelve months onward, immunization (Figure 1) (e3). children should be vaccinated against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and serogroup C meningococci. In later Methods childhood and adolescence, booster vaccinations are recom- In Germany, the Standing Vaccination Committee mended, in addition to the provision of any vaccina tions that (Ständige Impfkommission, STIKO) at the Robert Koch may have been missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Status Update on Measles and Rubella Elimination for 2016
    ANNUAL STATUS UPDATE ON MEASLES AND RUBELLA ELIMINATION FOR 2016 Annual Status Update on Measles and Rubella Elimination for 2016 Germany 0 | P a g e ANNUAL STATUS UPDATE ON MEASLES AND RUBELLA ELIMINATION FOR 2016 This update is to be submitted to the WHO Regional Office by 15 April 2017. Please upload an electronic version of the update and a copy of page 5 signed by the NVC members to the RVC SharePoint: http://workspace.who.int/sites/EURORVC How to upload the report: 1. Make a copy of your report and any supporting documents and supplementary data in original (Microsoft Word) format. PLEASE DO NOT CONVERT THIS FILE INTO PDF FORMAT! 2. Login at “http://workspace.who.int/sites/EURORVC“ using the password provided by the WHO Secretariat to the NVC chairperson and EPI manager. You are at RVC SharePoint. 3. Click on “Country Annual Status Reports”. 4. Select and click on your country folder. 5. Open the folder for year of reporting (2016). 6. Click on “Upload” or drag the file to folder and it will be copied. 7. Click on “Browse…” or “Upload Multiple Files…” to select a single or multiple files from your PC or MAC to upload. 8. Select your file(s) and click on “OK”. 9. Double check that the files are uploaded under the Country Annual Status Reports/Your country name. Should you have any problems with access to the RVC SharePoint or uploading the report, please contact the WHO Secretariat by e-mail ([email protected]). This update report consists of three sections: Section 1: National Verification Committee (NVC) Section 2: Country measles and rubella profile Section 3: Update of general programme activities by components We would kindly ask you to follow the instructions provided in the form and enter numbers or text as required in each particular table.
    [Show full text]
  • (COVID-19) Daily Situation Report of the Robert Koch Institute
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) WeeklyDaily SituationSituation Report fromof the the Robert Robert Koch Koch Institute Institute CALENDAR08/01/202116/01/2021 WEEK 26/202 - UPDATED1 - CURRENT STATUS STATUS FOR GERMANY FOR GERMANY Since 6 March 2021, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has been publishing the English version of the COVID-19 situation reports for Germany on a weekly basis. Information on the daily epidemiological situation is available on the RKI’s online COVID-19 dashboard. In addition, the RKI’s website provides daily situation reports in German, information on vaccination data and from the intensive care registry, as well as other regularly uploaded data. [Information sources are provided at the end of this report]. The following information is provided in this situation report: Overview on the epidemiological situation, demographic distribution of cases, surveys on laboratory tests of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany, and information from additional RKI-based surveillance systems. – Changes since the last report are marked blue in the text – The current epidemiological situation in Germany As of 01 July 2021 Vaccination DIVI-Intensive care Confirmed cases 7-day incidence (7-di) monitoring register No. of districts Change to previous No. of vaccinations Total1 Active cases2 Total population with 7-di day for no. of cases reported in last 24h > 50/100,000 pop currently in ICU +892 -600 5.1 ±0 1st vaccin. + 443,036 -24 (3,729,033) [ca. 12,400] cases/100,000 pop. [0/412] 2nd vaccin. + 533,491 [590] Total no. of people No. of districts vaccinated with No. of deaths in 60-79 80+ Recovered3 Deaths with 7-di one/two vaccine ICU compared to years years > 100/100,000 pop dose/s and share of the previous day population +1,400 +63 1.9 1.4 ±0 N1: 45,817,029 (55.1%)4 + 51 (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Containment Scouts: First Insights Into an Initiative to Increase the Public Health Workforce for Contact Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Project Report The Containment Scouts: First Insights into an Initiative to Increase the Public Health Workforce for Contact Tracing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany Dunja Said 1,*,† , Simon Brinkwirth 1,*,†, Angelina Taylor 1 , Robby Markwart 2 and Tim Eckmanns 1 1 Unit 37—Healthcare-Associated Infections, Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance and Consumption, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (T.E.) 2 Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743 Jena, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (S.B.); Tel.: +49-30-18754-5061 (D.S.); +49-30-18754-3882 (S.B.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany has demanded a substantially larger public health workforce to perform contact tracing and contact management of COVID-19 cases, in line with recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO). In response, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) established the national “Containment Scout Initiative” (CSI) to support the local health authorities with a short-term workforce solution. It is part of a range of measures for strengthening Citation: Said, D.; Brinkwirth, S.; the public health system in order to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany. The CSI is an Taylor, A.; Markwart, R.; Eckmanns, T. The Containment Scouts: First Insights example of how solutions to address critical health system capacity issues can be implemented into an Initiative to Increase the Public quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiologisches Bulletin 34/2015
    Epidemiologisches Bulletin 24 of August 2015 / No. 34 Current data and information on infectious diseases and public health Statement of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination at the RKI Recommendations of the Standing Committee on Vaccination This week 34/2015 (STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute/Effective: August 2015 DOI 10.17886/EpiBull-2015-001.3 Recommendations of the Standing These STIKO vaccination recommendations were endorsed during the 79th and 81st Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) STIKO meetings and are considered enacted upon their publication on 24 August 2015. at the Robert Koch Institute This 2015 version replaces the previous STIKO vaccination recommendations published in Effective: August 2015 August 2014 in Epidemiologisches Bulletin (Epid. Bull.) 34/2014 of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). The scientific rationale for the modified STIKO recommendations will be available Contents in Epid. Bull. 35/2015, 36/2015, and 37/2015 on the RKI website (www.stiko.de/en). ▶ National immunisation plan (routine vaccinations), p. 329 ▶ Standard vaccination for Disclaimer adults; indicated, and booster This document is a translation of the original Recommendations of the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute (http://www.rki.de/stiko-empfehlungen) on vaccinations, p. 331 behalf of the Robert Koch Institute as of 8/2015. The German text is authoritative, and no liability is ▶ Notes on routine vaccinations, assumed for any translation errors or for the translation’s correctness in case of subsequent revisions p. 337 to the German original. ▶ General information on immu- nisations, p. 341 Preliminary remarks ▶ Post-exposure vaccination and Vaccinations are among the most effective and significant preventive medical other measures for specific measures.
    [Show full text]
  • German Public Preferences for Priority Access to the COVID-19 Vaccination
    Policy Brief German public preferences for priority access to the COVID-19 vaccination How do preferences match up with official 29 January 2021 regulations? Prof. Simon Munzert, Data Science Lab at the Hertie School #COVID-19 Dr. Lukas F. Stoetzer, SCRIPTS/Humboldt University of Berlin #Vaccination Prof. Anita Gohdes, Hertie School #Polling Prof. Başak Çalı, Hertie School Dr. Will Lowe, Data Science Lab at the Hertie School Vaccination against COVID-19 has started around the globe. Policymakers in Germany, as elsewhere, have defined criteria to regulate who gets priority access to the vaccination, such as age, underlying health conditions, or those who hold system-relevant jobs. The success of the vaccination project depends on public acceptance of this distribution plan. We present data on public views from a population survey conducted in Germany in September 2020. Our study shows that the German government’s criteria are in line with those popular among the general public. However, we also find differences in priorities: for example, the general population does not identify age as a decisive criterion. 1 Germany’s plan to prioritise COVID-19 vaccination A key challenge to distributing COVID 19 vaccines is determining who gets priority access, as supply of the vaccine is initially limited. Because not everyone may be vaccinated immediately, governments face both a distribution conflict regarding who gets the vaccine first and the logistical challenge of administering it. Policy Brief, 29 January 2021 1/6 In December 2020, the German Federal Standing Committee on Vaccination (Ständige Impfkommission, STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute published recommendations for prioritising distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • “Delta” Variant
    CORAT Therapeutics GmbH • Inhoffenstr. 7 • 38124 Braunschweig • Germany PRESS RELEASE Press contact: Dr. Linda Kirchner [email protected] Phone: +49 1522 4047488 CORAT antibody COR-101 binds and inhibits all B.1.617 SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the fast proliferating “delta” variant • Laboratory data show a strong binding of COR-101 to the SARS-CoV-2 “delta” variant. Braunschweig, June 22, 2021 – CORAT Therapeutics GmbH announced that its COR-101 antibody, currently in Phase Ib/II clinical trials against SARS-CoV-2, recognizes the latest aggressive “delta“ variant B.1.617.2. "COR-101 is under evaluation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe symptoms. In this affected patient group, many of the currently approved antibodies cannot be applied," commented Dr. Andreas Herrmann, CEO of CORAT. Dr. Herrmann is confident about the use of COR-101 on the latest variants of SARS-CoV-2: "Our laboratory tests indicate that COR-101 recognizes the particularly aggressive new „delta” variant B.1.617.2, which is rapidly replacing the “alpha” variant B.1.1.7". On May 10th, the WHO classified the B.1.617.2 SARS-CoV-2 variants, first detected in India, as "of concern". According to current data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) the “delta” variant B.1.617.2 has replaced previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the "alpha" variant B.1.1.7, currently prevalent in Germany. COVID-19 vaccines currently in use have different efficacies against the newly emerging variants. Also, while vaccines can protect healthy people, they cannot cure people already suffering from COVID-19; moreover, not everyone responds to vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Flyer: the Robert Koch Institute at a Glance
    Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens Project Groups and Junior Research Groups The Public Health Institute for Germany Head: Prof. Dr Lars Schaade Ω Science communication The Robert Koch Institute’s aim is to protect the population Ω Acinetobacter baumannii against disease and improve its state of health. To this end, Ω Health threats caused by highly pathogenic and relevant Ω Emerging zoonoses 1,400 individuals from 50 nations and 90 different occupa- bioterrorist biological agents (microbes and toxins): Ω Epidemiological modelling of infectious diseases tional fields work together at RKI every day; around 600 of identification, assessment, management support Ω Systems-medicine of infectious disease them are scientists. They investigate the manifold impacts on Ω Federal Information Centre for Biological Threats and Ω Microbial Genomics (Junior Research Group) health and disease, draw up and verify evidence-based recom- Special Pathogens (IBBS) Ω Metabolism of microbial pathogens (Junior Research Group) mendations and develop new methods of health protection. Ω Cooperation with national and international partners in the field of biological security National Reference Centres and Consultant Laboratories Directorate Ω Diagnostics and rapid diagnostics at RKI Prof. Dr Lothar H. Wieler (President) Ω Providing support during international health emergencies Ω Bacillus anthracis Prof. Dr Lars Schaade (Vice President) Ω Research in diagnostics, epidemiology, pathogenesis and Ω Cryptococcosis and Rare Systemic Mycoses countermeasures of highly pathogenic agents Ω Electron Microscopic Diagnostics in Infectious Diseases Locations Ω Operating a biosafety level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) Ω Gonococci Ω Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin-Wedding (main site) Ω Influenza Ω Seestraße 10, 13353 Berlin-Wedding Centre for International Health Protection Ω Listeria Ω General-Pape-Straße 62–66, 12101 Berlin-Tempelhof Head: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timeless Legacy of Robert Koch Founder of Medical Microbiology
    GENERAL I ARTICLE The Timeless Legacy of Robert Koch Founder of Medical Microbiology Jaya S Tyagi Robert Koch was a German physician and scientist who made wide-ranging contributions to the study of infectious diseases. He is credited with developing medical microbi­ ology as a new and independent discipline. He is most renowned for deciphering the etiology oftuberculosis (TB), anthrax and cholera. He laid down rigorous guidelines for Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi is a establishing the link between a pathogen and a particular Professor at the Depart­ ment of Biotechnology, All disease that came to be known as Koch's postulates. To this India Institute of Medical day these postulates serve as benchmarks in the study of Sciences, New Delhi. infectious diseases. Microbes have held her fascination since her mid­ The year 2005 marked the 100th anniversary of the Nobel Prize teens. Her doctoral work awarded to Robert Koch for his discovery of the tubercle bacil­ on aflatoxin biosynthesis at the University of Delhi lus, the causative agent of TB, a disease that was rampant in further kindled her Europe towards the end of the 19th century. The significance of interest in microbial Koch's seminal discovery of the TB bacillus is only overshad­ pathogens. She leads a owed by his overall contribution to the study of infectious research group that works on the TB pathogen. Her diseases. What were the events and circumstances that triggered research focuses on Robert Koch's interest to study infectious diseases including understanding the role of a TB? two-component signaling system in bacterial Early Life persistence and pathogen­ esis and developing and Koch was born in Clausthal, Germany in 1843, the son of a validating TB diagnostics.
    [Show full text]