DOCSLIB.ORG

To Read a PDF of the Public Draft Plan, Click Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Read a PDF of the Public Draft Plan, Click Here SA TOMORROW SUB-AREA PLANNING: PORT SAN ANTONIO AREA REGIONAL CENTER PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT PLAN – MAY 19, 2021 Acknowledgements Mayor Planning Department Consultant Team Ron Nirenberg Bridgett White, AICP, Director MIG, Inc. Rudy Niño, Jr., AICP, Assistant Economic & Planning City Council Director Systems, Inc. Roberto C. Treviño, District 1 Bobbye Hamilton MOSAIC Jada Andrews-Sullivan, District 2 Patricia Renteria Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Rebecca J. Viagran, District 3 Erin De La Rosa Auxiliary Marketing Dr. Adriana Rocha Garcia, District 4 Chris Ryerson, AICP Services Shirley Gonzales, District 5* Priscilla Rosales-Piña, AICP Ximenes & Associates Melissa Cabello Havrda, District 6 Iris Gonzalez BowTie Ana Sandoval, District 7 Jacob Floyd, AICP Manny Peláez, District 8 Micah Diaz Special Thanks John Courage, District 9 Clint Eliason, AICP District 4 City Council Staff Clayton Perry, District 10 Brenda V. Martinez District 5 City Council Staff * Planning and Community Development Iris Gonzalez Susan Guinn, Office of the Committee Chair Sidra Schimelpfening City Attorney Heather Yost City Manager's Office Carlos Guerra II Public Works Department Erik Walsh, City Manager Shepard Beamon Transportation Roderick Sanchez, Assistant City Channary Gould, Port San DepartmentEconomic Manager Antonio Area Regional Development Center Plan Project Department Planning Commission Manager Joint Base San Antonio Christopher Garcia, Chair Sarah Serpas, AICP Port San Antonio Connie Gonzalez, Vice Chair Ana Villarreal VIA Metropolitan Transit George Peck, Pro-Tem Jennifer Sheppard San Antonio River Authority Michael Garcia, Jr. Joshua Jaeschke Texas Department of Transportation Dr. Samer Dessouky Julia Carrillo John Jackson Matthew Proffitt Meredith Siegel SA Tomorrow Sub-Area Planning: Port San Antonio Area Regional Center TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 PROCESS AND TIMELINE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 STAKEHOLDERS .................................................................................................................................................. 3 THE PLANNING TEAM .......................................................................................................................................... 4 THE SELECTION PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 5 A HISTORY OF THE PORT SAN ANTONIO AREA ........................................................................................................... 5 ASSETS ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 OPPORTUNITIES ................................................................................................................................................. 6 SUB-AREA PLANS AND EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PLANS ..................................................................... 6 3 VISION AND GOALS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 WHAT IS A VISION STATEMENT? ............................................................................................................................ 7 ESTABLISHING THE VISION AND GOALS ..................................................................................................................... 7 VISION ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 GOALS ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 4 PLAN FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................................... 10 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES AND PLAN FRAMEWORK MAP ....................................................................................... 11 PLAN FRAMEWORK MAP OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 13 ESTABLISHING THE PLAN FRAMEWORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. 14 LAND USE....................................................................................................................................................... 18 FOCUS AREAS .................................................................................................................................................. 29 MOBILITY ....................................................................................................................................................... 38 AMENITIES AND PUBLIC SPACES ........................................................................................................................... 50 HOUSING ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................. 57 5 NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES AND PRIORITIES ............................................................................................... 62 WHAT IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE AND PRIORITIES? ............................................................................................ 62 NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE AND PRIORITIES EXHIBIT LIST.............................................................................................. 62 NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE AND PRIORITIES: THOMPSON NEIGHBORHOOD ....................................................................... 68 NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE AND PRIORITIES: VALLEY HI NORTH ..................................................................................... 73 NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE AND PRIORITIES: CORNERSTONE VILLAGE, JUPITER NORTH, VILLAS DE ESPERANZA .......................... 75 6 IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................................................... 78 PLAN PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................ 78 INTENT OF THE PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... 78 HOW TO USE THIS PLAN .................................................................................................................................... 78 COORDINATION WITH ADOPTED PLANS .................................................................................................................. 78 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 79 IMPLEMENTATION – LAND USE ............................................................................................................................ 79 IMPLEMENTATION – FOCUS AREAS ....................................................................................................................... 82 IMPLEMENTATION – MOBILITY............................................................................................................................. 84 IMPLEMENTATION – HOUSING ............................................................................................................................. 89 IMPLEMENTATION – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................... 91 APPENDIX: MAPS, FIGURES, AND EXHIBITS.......................................................................................................... 93 LIST OF MAPS, FIGURES, AND EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................. 93 SA Tomorrow Sub-Area Planning: Port San Antonio Area Regional Center 1 1 Introduction Process and Timeline The process of developing the Port San Antonio Area Regional Center Plan was approximately 3 years from project chartering to City Council adoption. Planning Department staff worked with a wide range of community members that included neighborhood organizations and representatives, business and property owners, employers, educational institutions, and partner organizations and City departments to create a realistic and implementable plan for this important Regional Center. Phase 1: Project Chartering October-December 2018: The first phase of the project focused on project chartering. This phase ensures the planning process has a clear timeline and supports the overall goals of SA Tomorrow, while identifying key stakeholders to be involved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Hydrologic Data for the Lower San Antonio River Sub-Basin
    Technical Study Summaries: Lower San Antonio River Hydrologic Data Median flows in Lower San Antonio River have increased over 60 years The amount of water flowing in the Lower San Antonio River during median flow conditions has increased over the past 60 years, according to data collected from a gage maintained by the US Geological Survey. As shown in the figure below, the median flow of the river at Goliad, TX has increased for each day of the year when comparing values from the time periods 1940-1969 and 1970- 2007. The hydrologic character of the basin can be analyzed using similar techniques and data from a network of USGS gages within the Lower San Antonio River system. The relative location of gages currently maintained by the USGS is shown in the map below. A list of current and historical gages of interest to this is study is also provided. 800 1970 to 2007 700 1940 to 1969 600 500 400 [cfs] Discharge 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc t Nov Dec Figure 1. Median of daily discharge values for USGS gage #08188500, San Antonio River at Goliad. Figure 2. Relative location of current USGS stream gages in the San Antonio River Basin. Table 1. Historical and Current USGS Gages of Interest in the Lower San Antonio River Sub-basin. Earliest Latest Median Drainage Gage # Gage Name Record Record Flow (cfs) Area (mi2) 08181800 San Antonio Rv nr Elmendorf , TX 1962 Present 326 1,743 08182500 Calaveras Ck nr Elmendorf, TX 1954 1971 77.2 08183200 San Antonio Rv nr Floresville, TX 2006 Present 1,964 08183000 San Antonio Rv at
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • SAN ANTONIO #Tealtour #NOCCEA1 MARKET
    #TealTour SAN ANTONIO #NOCCEA1 MARKET Frederick Wilderness Park 21395 Milsa Dr, San Antonio, TX 78256 Friedrich Wilderness Park lies at the southern end of the Texas Hill Country. The park is hilly due to its location on the Balcones escarpment that separates the Texas Hill Country from the flat South Texas The Alamo 300 Alamo Plaza, San Antonio, TX 75205 The 1836 Battlefield has been lost in the nearly two centuries since that dramatic battle. The Mexican army tore down the compound’s outer walls in May of 1836. This left just two structures, the Alamo Church and Long Barrack. San Antonio grew up with the Alamo at its heart, with streets and buildings now occupying the site of the most sacred battle in Texas history. Headwaters Sanctuary Trails 4503 Broadway Street, San Antonio TX 78209 Our 53-acre nature sanctuary is home to the Blue Hole, the source spring of the San Antonio River. McAllister Park Trailhead 13102 Jones Maltsberger Road, San Antonio, TX 78247 Hiking and biking along the Greenway trails are great ways to get fit and enjoy the outdoors. There are over 50 major trailheads and neighborhood connections to access the trail system around the city. The four major segments of the Greenway are the Leon Creek Greenway, the Salado Creek Greenway, the Westside Creeks and the Medina River Greenway each offering several miles of uninterrupted trails. The San Antonio Riverwalk 849 E Commerce St, San Antonio, TX 78205 The San Antonio Riverwalk is a city park and network of walkways along the banks of the San Antonio River.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Antonio River Walk
    Independence Title LEARN MORE IndependenceTitle.com Non-motorized water craft are allowed in three areas of the River Walk. Please ATLANTA AVE, San Antonio note, these trails are not connected and users will need to use the proper access The Blue Hole points to move between them over land. University of the (Headwaters Museum Incarnate Word Sanctuary) • Historic Downtown Section, near the King William District, between Nueva and E. Hildebrand Ave. SAN PEDRO 19 Devine Rd. of Art South Alamo Street, with the access point off of East Guenther Street. Devine Rd. San Antonio ERIE AVE. T 281 Shook Ave. Shook Ave. e ul Zoo • Eagleland Section between South Alamo Street and the railroad bridge north of riv eta Ave. WARREN D Lone Star Boulevard, with the access point just north of the railroad bridge m iu d Alamo a Japanese t t Stadium Witte S • Mission Reach from Lone Star Boulevard to south of Loop 410 near Mission S Tea Garden r. W. JONES ine D Museum Espada. Trinity Alp . r University D Sunken Garden e MCCULLOUGH AVENUE g Rivers are ever-changing, dynamic systems d Theater i r n e with inherent dangers, so please k c a r remember the following safety tips: 281 B Broadway CAMDEN ,QÁDWDEOHERDWVRUZDWHUFUDIWDQG Red Oak Rd. S.A. Botanical Garden MARSHALL paddle boats are not allowed. Brackenridge Park HILL GROVE W. Mulberry Ave. E. Mulberry Ave. QUINCY Ave San Pedro BROOKLYN AVE • Make sure your paddling skills are equal Davis Park McCullough Ave. McCullough to the water conditions and proceed at A Avenue B ue River Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • PORT SAN ANTONIO BOARD of DIRECTORS Victoria M
    Kelly Field at Alternative Landing Surface Analysis Part I Report September 2017 300 S. Meridian Street Union Station Indianapolis, IN 46225 (317) 786-0461 chacompanies.com PORT SAN ANTONIO BOARD OF DIRECTORS Victoria M. Garcia, Chairwoman Edward J. Moore, Vice Chair Vacant, Secretary Chris Alderete, Treasurer Andrew Anguiano Rolando Bono Victor Landa Bill Mock Alex Nava Juan Solis Dan F. Weingart Marc Whyte PORT SAN ANTONIO STAFF PRESIDENT AND CEO Roland C. Mower VICE PRESIDENT OF ASSET MANAGEMENT Adrienne Cox EXECUTIVE VP, STRATEGIC INITIATIVES/AIRPORT Rick Crider, A.A.E. VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE & ACCOUNTING Pat Cruzen VICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS Paco Felici EXECUTIVE VP , COO & CFO Dan Ferris, CPA EXECUTIVE VP, GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Juan Antonio Flores VP OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT Ramon Flores VP OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Marcel Johnson EXECUTIVE VP OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Jim Perschbach VP OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, EAST KELLY RAILPORT German Rico SENIOR EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT & CEO Caroline Diaz *As of February 2017 Contents Summary: Part I Executive Summary Report Section A: Introduction Section B: Project Background Section C: References Section D: Chronicle of Coordination Section E: Definition of Requirements Section F: Existing Pavement History Section G: Geologic Conditions and Subgrade Investigation Section H: Existing Runway Pavement Section Analysis Section I: Estimated Remaining Pavement Service Life Section J: New Pavement Section Design Section K: Alternative Construction Materials Section L: Part I
    [Show full text]
  • Projects in Texas (2000 - 2012)
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundation - Projects in Texas (2000 - 2012) Award NFWF NFWF Non- Grantee NFWF Total Project Fiscal EZG# Project Title Grantee Project Description Federal Federal Matching Location Award Funds Year Funds Funds Funds Short Grass Prairie Protect, restore and enhance shortgrass prairie, LPC Conservation in The Nature habitat, and playas in the southeastern New Mexico and 2013 34736 $60,000 $60,000 $50,000 $110,000 New Mexico; Texas New Mexico and Conservancy Texas focal area and implement public education and Texas outreach activities. Aerial Survey Western The Lesser Prairie Chicken Interstate Working Group will Assessment of Association of Fish use the newly developed range-wide aerial survey to Colorado; Kansas; New 2013 35249 $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 $375,000 Lesser Prairie and Wildlife assess Farm Bill Programs for each of the 15X15 km Mexico; Oklahoma; Texas Chicken (LPC) Agencies survey blocks. Assess the abundance of Guadalupe Bass in the San Antonio River basin and re-introduce the species on the San Antonio River Upper San Antonio River in Texas. Project, which Basin Guadalupe San Antonio River supports the goals of the Southeast Aquatic Resources 2012 31188 Bass Assessment $44,201 $44,201 $300,000 $344,201 Texas Authority Partnership as part of the National Fish Habitat Action and Re- Plan, will restore aquatic and riparian habitats, expand of introduction (TX) the range and distribution of Guadalupe Bass, and improve the biotic integrity of the San Antonio River. Continue to reduce the gaps in knowledge of American Texas American Gulf Coast Bird Oystercatcher population status and breeding 2012 30267 Oystercatcher $134,975 $67,487 $67,487 $134,989 $269,964 Texas Observatory parameters, and begin implementation of conservation Conservation strategies on the Texas Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio River
    San Antonio River – Past, Present and Future The The Antonio San River Design Management Improvements Past, Present and Future San Antonio River Authority Past, Past, Presentand Future – • SARA was created by the State of Texas in 1937. • In 1961, the State expanded our responsibilities to preserve, protect and manage the resources and ecosystems of the San Antonio River Basin. • SARA has a role in: • Protecting our communities from flooding • Ensuring the future of our water resources San AntonioSan River • Nurturing our parks and natural resources • Preserving the quality and quantity of our water Presentation Outline • The history of the San Antonio River, Olmos Dam, downtown flood gates, and the San Antonio River Tunnel as a ‘designed system’. • Taking a multi-faceted approach to future project planning and design. • The case of the future San Antonio River Improvements Project. • Flood Warning and Flood Forecasting San Antonio River – Past, Present and Future The History of Flooding on on Flooding of History The the San Antonio River Antonio San the The Systematic Solution The Past Location Map LEGEND CHANNELIZATIONSan Antonio River HEAD WATERS TRIBUTARIESTributaries HILDEBRAND AVE. N 281 BEXARBEXAR WILSON W E KARNES LEXINGTON AVE. GOLIAD S ALAZAN 81 35 APACHE DOWNTOWN SAN ANTONIO CREEK CREEK RIVER CREEK PEDRO LOOP SAN 90 ALAMO ST. 90 10 10 MISSION CONCEPCION Past, Past, Presentand Future SAN – ANTONIO 281 81 MISSION 37 SAN JOSE 35 RIVER MISSION SAN JUAN 410 ESPADA MISSION San AntonioSan River San Antonio River – Past, Present and Future PAST Past • Waters of the San Antonio River have sustained human occupation along it’s banks for thousands of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Have a Great Weekend!
    Dear GEAA Landowners, You are invited to attend the initial meeting of a land stewards group for the San Antonio area that will be devoted to issues of importance to landowners and to the resources you steward. In the Austin area land managers recently met to discuss the myths and truths about ashe juniper—its origin and distribution, water “guzzling” reputation, behavior in a fire, etc. Participants brought citations from scientific/land management journals, discussed the issues, and a couple of people are compiling the citations which will be made available to all participants. Jayne Neal, Park Naturalist for the City of San Antonio, wants to organize the same kind of collaborative lands stewards group for the San Antonio areat. In addition to land owners and land managers, she has invited resource experts and members of the academic community in hopes of connecting people who manage land with people who have research interests and/or resource expertise. Groups represented include landowners, agencies (such as Texas Parks and Wildlife, Edwards Aquifer Authority, San Antonio River Authority), environmental consultants, universities, and resource people (like the US Geological Survey). The first meeting will be Tues., March 27, 1:30-3:30 at the Friedrich Wilderness Park classroom. For directions, please see http://www.sanaturalareas.org/fp/fpmaps.html, or feel free to contact [email protected] . Please come prepared to talk about your ideas for our group. What would you like to get from our meetings? How often should we meet? What topics should we discuss? What can you contribute? Please let Jayne know if you are coming, and feel free to forward this invitation to others who might be interested.
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Cancels 61% of Its Flights As Airlines Reel from Disruptions
    San Antonio Express-News | ExpressNews.com | Thursday, August 5, 2021 | B5 BUSINESS NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE Spirit cancels 61% of its flights CITY OF TERRELL HILLS The Board of Adjustment of the City of Terrell Hills will meet on Wednesday, Au- gust 18, 2021 at 4:30 pm at Terrell Hills City Hall, 5100 N. New Braunfels Ave, San Antonio, TX to discuss/take action on the following requests for variance from the as airlines reel from disruptions City’s Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14 – Zoning; Section VI –Dimensional Stand- ards For Residential Zone Districts A&A- 1; Subsection 8-Walls and Fences and By Michael Laris lems occur. June, Southwest Chief Oper- The company blamed at its Dallas-Fort Worth In- Chapter 14 –Zoning; Section VI –Dimen- sional Standards For Residential Zone WA SHINGTON POST Jon Jager, an analyst at ating Officer Michael Van de “overlapping operational ternational Airport hub. Districts A&A-1; Figure A: Summary of aviation data firm Cirium Ven told investors last challenges” for the prob- “It was sustained wind, Dimensional Requirements; Side Setback: A. Request by Nic Abbey Luxury Homes WASHINGTON — Spirit and a former schedule plan- month. He cited technology lems. It said a combination hail and rain. It was not a on behalf of Christian &Corsica Wood- bury to install an 8’ tall fence, instead of Airlines canceled 60 per- ner for a major U.S. carrier, issues in June that led to “ex- of bad weather, computer great situation for the oper- 6’ tall fence, along the rear property line, also along the east &west property lines, cent of its flights Wednesday said airlines are used to treme delays” as the compa- problems and staffing short- ation,” said American up to the front setback of the residence at and apologized to custom- planning for events such as ny also works through staff- ages caused “widespread ir- spokesman Curtis Blessing.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2011 VIA Metropolitan Transit San Antonio, Texas
    June 2011 VIA Metropolitan Transit San Antonio, Texas 2035 Long Range Comprehensive Transportation Plan Executive Summary Pre Pared for: VIA Metropolitan Transit, San Antonio, Texas Pre Pared by: Jacobs Int assocIa Ion wIth: Ximenes & Associates, RJ Rivera, Town Planning, Connetics Transportation Group, and BBP & Associates June 2011 VIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES LRCTP TEAM TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE h enry r. Muñoz, III, Chair VIA Bus and Rail Strategic Planning Leroy alloway, ARMA b ill barker, aIcP, COSA - Office of rick Pych, Vice Chair and Project Development Staff bill barker, AICP, COSA - Office of Environmental Policy steve P. allison c hristina M. castaño, Environmental Policy spencer r. (bob) hurst, Valley Forest LRCTP Project Manager Mary briseño Julie brown, TxDOT Neighborhood Association arturo herrera Linda chavez–thompson, Secretary Jelynne Leblanc burley, CPS Pamela Morsi Kiel, Alamo Heights Jason rodriguez Resident Gerald w. Lee christine Viña, aIa carmelina rocha davis, COSA - International and Economic rob Killen, City Coucil District I James Lifshutz VIA Bus Operations Development Dept. bianca Maldonado, Monticello Park bill Martin t racy Manning, cPa christina de La cruz, COSA - Public Works Neighborhood Association Lou Miller Jacobs hope olds, Chairwoman, City of Converse Manuel “Manny” Pelaez Mike frisbie, COSA - CIMS Dept. Javier argüello Building & Standards Commission Gavino ramos John Kulpa Jeanne Geiger, MPO Margaret richardson, Office of State VIA LEADERSHIP bill Lieberman Marcus hammer, COSA - Public Works Representative Jóse Menéndez Mike Mcanelly Keith t. Parker, AICP, President/CEO richard higby, Bexar County - Michael roberts, People Against roland a. Lozano, Deputy Director Jimi Mitchell Infrastructure Services Dept. Corruption Lee brian d.
    [Show full text]
  • Swim at Your Own Risk
    Swim at Your Own Risk Bacteria Pollution in Texas Beaches and Waterways Threatens Public Health Swim at Your Own Risk Bacteria Pollution in Texas Beaches and Waterways Threatens Public Health Gideon Weissman, Frontier Group Brian Zabcik and Luke Metzger, Environment Texas Research & Policy Center August 2018 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Dr. Hanadi Rifai of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Houston, Ken Kramer of the Sierra Club–Lone Star Chapter, John Rumpler of Environment America Research and Policy Center, and additional individuals for their review of drafts of this document, and for their valuable insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik and Abigail Bradford of Frontier Group for editorial support. Environment Texas Research & Policy Center thanks the Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation, the Meadows Foundation, the Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation, and the Pisces Foundation for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment Texas Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2018 Environment Texas Research & Policy Center. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 U.S. License. To view the terms of this license, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/us. Environment Texas Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting our air, water and open spaces. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and decision-makers, and help the public make their voices heard in local, state and national debates over the quality of our environment and our lives.
    [Show full text]