Understanding the antecedents of consumers’ attitudes towards doggy bags in restaurants: Concern about food waste, culture, norms and emotions Lucie Sirieix, Jan Lála, Klára Kocmanová
To cite this version:
Lucie Sirieix, Jan Lála, Klára Kocmanová. Understanding the antecedents of consumers’ attitudes towards doggy bags in restaurants: Concern about food waste, culture, norms and emotions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, 2017, 34, pp.153-158. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.004. hal-02629385
HAL Id: hal-02629385 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02629385 Submitted on 27 May 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' commercial,or receive not fromThisinresearchdid fundingagenciesgrant specific any public, the waste Food KEYWORDS for adoptionovercome the ofthis produc leftovers encourag emotions: and norms behavior waste, the Republic, from Czech respondents 20 and France in respondents 20 with study qualitative a on Based ABSTRACT. WASTE, TOWARDS CONSUMERS OF ANTECEDENTS THE UNDERSTANDING utr, oil norms social culture, rltd to related s e
leaving CULTURE,NORMS EMOTIONS AND ConsumerServices, culture,foodwaste, norms about emotions and ofconsumersantecedents A paraître: ;
restaurants
DOGGY BAGS DOGGY
not es hs td aims study this
leftovers - anticipated regret anticipated for og bags. doggy Sirieix L. J Lala, K KocmanovaSirieixKLala,J L. - p profitsectors. ; Comment citer cedocument:
roa nrs encourag norms ersonal socialnorms ; asking for a doggy bag generates immediateshamegenerates bag doggy a for asking n emotions and 34, 153 34,
innovation.
IN RESTAURANTSIN o etr nesad o cons how understand better to eut hglgt a highlight Results ’
attitudes towards doggy bagsinconcern towards attitudes restaurants: ; and
e - 158 motions
guilt
otiue o etuat patrons restaurants to contribute
.
; Finally, the study sheds light on obstacles to to obstacles on light sheds study the Finally,
behavioralintentions e
o t waste to not
, (201 ,
double paradox between conflicting conflicting between paradox double , ,
Journal of Retailing andRetailing Journalof : 7 CONCERN ABOUT FOOD FOOD ABOUT CONCERN ), U ), nderstanding the umers while
’ ocr aot food about concern salient social norms norms social salient ’
ATTITUDES ’ attit while udes
leaving
and Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' 2 1 but food In and financial direct et al., (Betz the out pointed have environmental industry restaurant the 2012 l'Énergie, in de professionals et durable Développement du l'Écologie, for France fooallof In 15% example, waste. food of part significant a for responsible is industry hospitality The retailers)andthemselves ultimately consumers t processors) and manufacturers food (farmers,andfoods process produce who from waste, those food reducing and preventing in play to role a have chain food the in actors All2011). al., et (Gustavsson waste food done, is nothing If million EU the in waste food of estimate an generated Europe across from data of analysis consumption,280 represent productionto 2012) come food their where about conscious environment and health Standard, Reporting and Waste Accounting and Loss system food sustainable a ofdefinition in the issuemajor becominga now is waste co a considered years, many for Underestimated Introduction 1.
http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/FLW_Standard_V1_Full_Report.pdf http:/ deed, the restaurant the deed, /www.developpement I Erp ad ot Aeia fo lse ad at, nldn al hss from phases all including waste, and losses food America, North and Europe In . tons also
; this equates to 173 kilograms of food waste per person per waste food ofkilograms 173 to equates this ; 2015 ; 2015 aiu apcs f serv of aspects various fet o fo wse s el s t idrc efc o te restaurant the on effect indirect its as well as waste food of effects
toe h mk fos vial fr osmto (optlt sector, (hospitality consumption for available foods make who those o
Namkung and Jang, 2013) NamkungJang, and
’ s image is affected by many factors since c since factors many by affected is image s Comment citer cedocument: - d waste is attributed to the hospitality and food services food hospitalityand the to is attributed waste d durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_final_gaspillage_alimentaire_nov2012.pdf s
from
s xetd o ie o bu 16 million 126 about to rise to expected is (i. e. e. (i. ( Dowd c eprecs Hn n Km 2009) Kim, and (Han experiences ice Thøgersen, - 300
and .
k (Parfitt et al.,et 2010) (Parfitt ilograms
Burke, 2013) Burke, - rdc f u scey f abundance, of society our of product 2011
2016
per person a year.a person per
; Klöckner, ;
1 ) . Consumers have become more more become have Consumers .
and about food waste food about and ustomers evaluate not only only not evaluate ustomers . 2
) ( . . Stenmarck 2013) Both academics and and academics Both The collection and Thecollection and , more concerned more , S . tons
ervice quality quality ervice (
et al., et Ministère de de Ministère
(
The Food The - by 2020 2020 by 28 of 88 of 28 ’
s (
Evans, 2016). image
food
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' antecedents has study No ba doggy promote to attempt first a 2015 in was there and Republic, Czech in case the not is policyagainst food of importance chosen were countries because two These Republic. Czech the from respondents 20 and France bags doggy of use the preventing towards perspective. and barriers 2013) Jang, and (Namkung needed ‘ under an is restaurants in and attitudes Consumer common. not examineconsumers to wish in usual is ofthisantecedents consumers understanding guests consumption 2009 Namkung, heighten green gs. gs.
’ ’ leftovers trend neither has a tradition of using doggy bagsand doggy using of traditionhasa neither s doggy bags doggy
customer's positive emotion positive customer's many
contribute to restaurants patrons restaurants to contribute
In order In
experience by experience oeta bnft of benefits potential ( food waste food explored the attitudes related to the the to related attitudes the explored Schubert
Fernande ; countries, it remains unknown in several European countries. European several in unknown remains it countries, atti otiue t a to contributes C .
in restaurants in to fill this gap, this fill to tude onversely, France differs from Czech Republic by Republic Czech from differs France onversely,
Comment citer cedocument: et al., 2010) al., et behavior . ’ , is , In France, fighting against food waste has become a priority,hasa becomewastewhich food againstFrance,fighting In tiue towards attitude - ’
xlrd ra n h hsiaiy ieaue de literature, hospitality the in area explored s
neatn wt tecsoe (Walls customer the with interacting attitude
important in industry.restaurantimportant the n Cruz and al intentions towards environmentally sustainable practices practices sustainable environmentally towards intentions al .
, the antecedents of these attitudes and, perceived barriers barriers perceived and, attitudes these of antecedents the , . More precisely, n precisely, More .
h dgy bag doggy the bagsdoggy where in countries antecedents theirand s It is based on a qualitative study with 20 respondents in respondents 20 with study qualitative a on based is It
this study was designed to understand to designed was study this n diinlrsac ngenrsarn rcie is practices restaurant green on research additional and etr evc wie euig od waste. food reducing while service better and 2016 , affect ’ attitudes
). this s evc employees Service consumer
d evc fo te etuat customers restaurant the from service oggy service
o research has examined the the examined has research o and acceptance or reject of the the of reject or acceptance and they b ag also also behavior and
n re t udrtn which understand to order in have
However, t al. et bv all, above
l intentions al in can add value to the the to value add can ,
common the cultural cultural the common 2011 the level of of level the spite the growing growing the spite while patrons ) . . what are the the are what Therefore, we Therefore, Attending to to Attending
this service service this (Jang and and (Jang ’ perceived perceived
attitudes attitudes d public Thus, oggy oggy are are ’
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' 3 foo way the but consumers by acceptance potential its explore not do researchers where U.S. the in usual is it countries, some in Unknown cultures. 2010 Weger, servers food to according low very is wage minimum federal the since wage decent a earn to servers for a alsopracticesand but food onlynot affects culture However, morefocus Americans on consequences(Rozin ofthe eating Americans than eat to particular, the r important as such practices different Culture 2.1 C 2. avenues this of adoption the for overcome to obstacles patrons waste, food about concern towards practice. and concept bag
https://www.dol.gov/whd/state/tipped.htm case of practice which varies among cultures among varies which practice of case “ Culture onceptual frameworkonceptual French paradox French ’
attitudes . and the the
French portion sizes are smaller in comparable restaurants, the French take longer take French the restaurants, comparable in smaller are sizes portion French ole in the relationship with food. For example,For in olefood. relationship the with
“ and social Doggy Bag Doggy ) . .
normsin h dgy a is bag doggy The
and norms in restaurants in norms
” can be explained by the fact that that fact the by explained be can declared Comment citer cedocument:
” and concept ’ restaurants Th
appearance (Guéguen and Jacob, 2014) or or 2014) Jacob, and (Guéguen appearance tipping us, th us, utr, oil norms social culture,
h Fec fcs more focus French the behavior
in order to inorder e first e
, we, onethank reviewerfor this information r sn dgy bags doggy using or nte eape f rcie hc vre a o among lot a varies which practice of example another
influence the way of of way the influence related s aim of the study is to to is study the of aim
understand how antecedents suchasantecedents how understand social
(i.e. in the United States, tipping tipping States, United the in (i.e.
to n emotions and innovation og bags. doggy d the French eat less thanless Americans. eat French the n h eprec o eating of experience the on
servers handle customers handle servers Rozin et al. (2003) et Rozin
Mli, 2014) (Melvin, ,
behavior 2005). eat e and proposes future research future proposes and ing xplore the the xplore
Finally, it sheds light on on light sheds it Finally, otiue o restaurants to contribute
( s. s. Rozin et al., 2003) 2003) al., et Rozin The case of tipping is tipping of The case
behavior .
Culture plays an an plays Culture patrons show part that of
is necessary necessary is cons (Seiter and and (Seiter ’ 3 leftovers. ) ) ’
attitudes attitudes but
umers while also and In ’
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' 2.2 2.2 waste e of types satisfaction comfort, (excitement, intentions mediate (2009) emotion of role The materialsanctions,suchas re shame, including sanctions, feeling feelings experience restaurant the in emotions service good for worker to kind, and generous feel to desire States United social the to conforming to Accordingto act. to expect customersor in them other wayact the think isspace,customersthey oftenact public a s Besidesculture, giveserversif food customersto higherto tipsbox theycu example,Sei For Consumers
were not. were An important question is whether and how how and whether is question important An s showed that that showed “ emotions and cheap . . motions h rltosis ewe atmospherics between relationships the a e al. et Han mediate Azar
shows that that shows ”
and foodwaste and Hne tpig is tipping Hence, . ter and Weger and ter ocial normsocial
were included in these studies, these in included were (2004) s s
h feto mto fcoso eii intention revisit on factors emotion of effect the is intuitive is annoyance, and romance) romance) andannoyance, (2009) (2009) oiie emotion positive uh s en fi, eln epty ih okr ad rvns from prevents and workers with empathy feeling fair, being as such Comment citer cedocument: , ,
t es sm pol drv bene derive people some least at ifsocialnorm a people willerode ( Azar
wards and punishmentandwards
norm. influencecustomers ul ad os f self of loss and guilt confirmed that that confirmed : concern, : (2014) (2014)
, , given the hedonic nature of restaurants. of nature hedonic the given 2004)
His
. . “ mrs ohr and others impress show that showthat pten f eair nocd n at y internal by part in enforced behavior of pattern a According to Azar, t Azar, to According
study on on study . . jy ectmn, ecfles and peacefulness, excitement, (joy, normsandguilt eie, t Besides, utpecmoet o consumptio of components multiple significantly affect significantly the principle of reciprocity leadsrestaurants reciprocity of the principle ’ h eouin f the of evolution the
emotions related to sustainability and food and sustainability to related emotions
behavior ” and (Gintis,2003) - oil norms social h sem a opsd o uey external purely to opposed as esteem, is study highlights the the highlights study is service ,
s
to show gratitude and reward the the reward and gratitude show to tomers s inrestaurants. s ipping is associated with positive positive with associated is ipping
do notderive benefits do fi s rm tipping from ts ,
n post and ’ n etuat may restaurants in
.
leftovers.
customer satisfactio customer
. However, if d if However, . tipping custom in the the in custom tipping
Jang and Namkung and Jang -
dining Since
, , importance of of importance
including the the including refreshment) refreshment) a n emotions emotions n in addition behavior restaurant restaurant evolve ifferent n, and and n, al al ’ . .
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' oil om ad mtos n tiue and attitudes on emotions and norms social socia culture, of importance the hand one the on regarding evidence provides research past conclude, To foodwastecontext. in related restaurant to a emotions and norms social of impact potential the on yet focused has study no knowledge, Goldstein sustainable in engage to consumers encouraging co eco select to intentions outcome future a of is that emotion counterfactual restaurants. of context the one of violation potential food guiltafter waste food regarding studies existing However, a social and norms Social brandperceived2013). Jang, andqualityequity restaurant and (Namkung abo waste. food of issue general the or waste food of experience the by affected emotionally being as and consequencesits and waste food B 2012 (Evans, c that show waste food with dealing studies Most crig to ccording orgne et al et orgne tx of ntext u fo t behavior o
wse n etuat. However, restaurants. in waste d et al., et hotels, hotels, .
; l norms and emotions in restaurants and, on the other hand, the influence of of influence the hand, other the on and, restaurants in emotions and norms l Qu ( 2016 asn n Ma, 02 ad r ocre hn hy ho fo away. food throw they when concerned are and 2012) Meah, and Watson
is ( 2007 Steenhaut se e al. et ested waste guilt guilt ) define ) i ” nvoking nvoking (Bui, 2009). (Bui, ;
or d. Comment citer cedocument: - redy restaurants friendly
are ’
reusing s own standards own s
Anticipated guilt, defined as defined guilt, Anticipated and Close to anticipated guilt, a guilt, anticipated to Close
a motn i icesn consumers increasing in important (2013)
s experienced in the present situation when imagining the results results the imagining whensituation present the in experienced c
ocial VanKenhove onsumer's of In restaurants, the restaurants, In
towels git ly a iprat oe n euig od waste food reducing in role important an plays guilt , n orms orms
” , , c No research has examined yet consumers yet examined has research No (Cotte et al. et (Cotte oncern for oncern Theotokis and Manganari,2015). Theotokis and
and increasing anticipated guilt are are guilt anticipated increasing and , , has been highlighted highlighted been has restaurant 2006 behavior at home at
; behavior Hibbert food wasting about bad feel onsumers role of anticipated regret anticipated of role rltd o od at. oee, n However, waste. food to related s f nticipated regret can be defined as as defined be can regret nticipated “ , ood ood re patcs nlec customers influence practices green
guilt guilt 2005 only have considered the feeling of of feeling the considered have only w
( s et al., 2007) and more precisely,more and 2007) al., et that arises from contemplating a arisesfrom a contemplating that ), seems particularly relevant in relevant particularlyseems ), aste as att as aste h ’ otels' otels' tia intentions ethical Km t l, 2013). al., et (Kim l inen aching importance to importance aching
-
r However, to our However, to euse euse in consumers in p a way of of way a ’ n pro and rograms concern concern
In the the In Le “ o o a a - , , ’ . ’
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' ilo tn a te rd ad itiuin ee, .0 mlin os n pn m open in tons million 0.400 level, distribution and trade the 0.750 at restaurants, tons million by tons million 1.050 level, households the at wasted are tons million of % 67 (with themselves consumersby produced is waste biggest The EU. whole the for tons million 2010 for tons million 7 exceeds France in the to up faced hasFrance instruction consumers the on lot a focus French the countries.neighbouring of cuisine influencedthe by been have they centuries a in common have also cuisine FrenchCzech and culture. policypublic food of importance cultural the as such characteristics common both have they because chosen were Republic Czech the and France 3.1 3. uncoveringpotentialbarriersandperceived benefits understand to try ex to proposes therefore, patrons restaurants to contribute and if understand researchhas Research Rationalefocusingon for the total waste), but the part of hospitality with its 15 % is not insignificant not is % 15 its with hospitality of part the but waste), total the . . ‘ Youyourputplate will finishI on what l In
Method explore about food waste. food about ine customers how how with d ology
the attitudes attitudes the Comment citer cedocument: consumers this importance given to food, to given importance this plore
issue of food waste in recent years. The total volume of food waste food ofyears.volume total The in recent waste food issueof ’ acceptance or reject of the Doggy bag concept and practice and concept bag Doggy the of reject or acceptance experience of eating (Rozin, 2005) (Rozin, eating of experience
FranceandCzech Repub the the Food and c and Food ’ attitudes ’ and concern about waste, about concern potential behavior ,
n differences and
uisine and relationship (more than 110kgs per person) person) per 110kgs than (more s related to Doggy the Bag to related s behavior are ’ .
(Melvin,2014)
very important to the French and Czech Czech and French the to important very children s b s lic s related to related s
, norms social culture,
etween these variables in order to order in variables these etween
uh s h lvl f concern of level the as such
are are and it is the same for Czech Czech for same the is it and
- . .
old tradition, even though though even tradition,old As mentionedpreviously, As raised
og bags. doggy
concept in France in of the total 90 90 total the of and emotions and res 0.150 arkets,
hs study, This
in order into order with the the with : 4.740 and
by ,
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' 5 4 France:from people with done were interviews 20 years. 38.6 was respondents an participate reached been have to appeared saturation person the with links no have participate to accepted worker). retired, inactive, student, level education (2) years), mixed a representing population. sample a generate to chosen was method sampling illustrative An 3.2 is concept unknown. quite the inforbag France,occasionrenameddoggythe l owners. restaurant the by regulations of knowledge of lack a and consumers of part the on obstacles bag doggy of concept The 5 729,000 estimated an annually produces Republic Czech The priority. a not is waste food which for Republic fines. heavyface or waste reduce and sort 2016, 2025. by half bytonsmillion ’ www.Glopolis.cz ) http://www.developpement Environnement et de lade l et Maîtrisede Environnement . This is lower than the the than lower is This . 1 wmn wr are ih epe rm h zc Republic. Czech the from people with carried were women) 16 d Sample and DataSampleCollectionand wr cnatd rsos rts 4 ad 52%). and 44% rates (response contacted were s n ntaie y h Fec aec fr niomn (ADEME environment for agency French the by initiative An
so the majority of respondents are women in both samples both in women are respondents of majority the so u smln fae a dfnd y () g (18 age (1) by: defined was frame sampling Our
h etbihet ta sre oeta 10 el pr a wl hv t, by to, have will day per meals 180 than more serve that establishments The the the tons food industr food
Comment citer cedocument: - of food waste, which represents more than 69 kg per person per kg 69 morethan which represents waste, food of durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_final_gaspillage_alimentaire_nov2012.pdf
figures for France. However, official figures/statistics do not exist. not do figures/statistics officialHowever, France. for figures (e.g. s o well not is
y
college, university/ college, 4 . . The h sml i a ovnec sml bt h aut who adults the but sample convenience a is sample The
’ Energie 2015 - known . . In both countries, women were more willing to to willing more were women countries, both In anti ) was launched spreadingaiming inthe 2015, at was ) u
- niversity. The situation is quite different in the Czech Czech the in different quite is situation The n France in waste law has set a target of cutting trash in trash acuttingtargetof set lawhas waste “ gourmet bag gourmet h igher education) and (3) (3) and education) igher 45 French persons and 38 Czech Czech 38 and persons French 45 being ,
Data collection ceased when when ceased collection Data ” . In the Czech In the this . Republic, – 9 years/30 29 confronted with cultural cultural with confronted The a The . . 20 interviews (4 men (4 interviews 20 verage age of all all of age verage profession – , , 7 9 years/50+ 49
men and men Agence de de Agence
( Glopolis
(i.e. (i.e. 13
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' waste in waste general. the leaving and plate the in leftovers restaurant. his leaving one other the boxed, be to leftovers different two of basis the on react to among concerns ethical the of some overcomes possible different the of coverage good consum identifying of patrons hypothetical involving used, was French. into interviews translated and respondents Czech academic interviewersbyinterviewsin FrenchCzech Theand Junecarried May2015 andout were protectconfidentiality. namesto was respondents allof age average The women. st human subjects human st Do you have any experience with it? Have you ever asked for one (what was the dish, dish, the was(what one for asked everyou Have it? withexperience any have you Do 1) these of thinkyou indo restaurantWhat what place? thesetake situations do opinion, of type betweenyourdifference generaltwocharacteristics)the is Whatthe In cases? leaves samecustomerbut context the situation: boxed, be his to asksleftoversyou customer restaurantfor the to next and Scenario n ht etuat? ht ye f od s prpit ad o aporae o this for appropriate not and appropriate is food of type What restaurant)? what in
n to rdae students) graduate two and Then a discussion was conducted about about conducted was discussion a Then ” Doggy bagDoggy( . ( . behavior – follow “
Im agine r wt seii eprecs te scenario the experiences, specific with ers - Comment citer cedocument: u s?)
p ( Schoefer and Ennew, and Schoefer
e.g. Do you know the concept "Doggy bag"? Do you like this idea? this like you Do knowyou bag"? "Doggy concept Do the e.g. questions:
the following The samples are presented inpresented are Thesamples A Describe what type of person. (gender, age, education,person.(gender,what age, of type Describe behavior .
associated with the deliberate elicitation of emotions emotions of elicitation deliberate the with associated
Czech interviewers conducted the interviews with with interviews the conducted interviewers Czech ’
outcomes. outcomes.
situations. situations. behavior s in a restaurant: one customer asking for his his for asking customer one restaurant: a in s
leaves his leftovers in the plate, paysplate,and leftoversthe in leaveshis 32.6 2005). s regarding leftovers. regarding s (1) (1)
First situation: y situation: First Moreover years.
More precisely, respondents had respondents precisely, More the doggy bag concept and concept bag doggy the
A scenario A Participants were given were Participants te scenario the , ppendix - based approach ensures a a ensures approach based - ouinarea sitting based qualitative study study qualitative based
1 and 1 G iven the difficulty difficulty the iven - based approach approach based A ppendi
Second
codes for codes (2) (2) x2.
food food (one (one first first
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' bagDoggyusers bag Relationwith Themes Table 1. 85 agreemepercent of level satisfactory the above is which percent, 90 was coders the between reliability interrater the data; the coded judges separate Two1977). (Kassarjan, literature the according conclusions (Miles and interpretation data, of recompilation data, of reducing format: following the to adhered analysis The analysis. content qualitative using analyzed were interviews The b to The
e analyzed in analyzedbyauthors. e parallel the
interviews and waste? concernedfood by perspective o consequences the are what 2) reasonmain the widespreadwhyso not isconcept this France Czechin / Republic? w and concept
Themesclassification
Huberman, 1994). 1994). Huberman,
Doggy Food waste in general ( general in waste Food lasted between 45 and 60 minutes, and were recorded minutes,were and60 andbetween45 lasted nt (Kassarjan, 1977). (Kassarjan, nt 1977). Tablecompiles1 the
( rdcr, consumers, producers, hy? What quality/s must the doggy bag have according to you? What is What you? accordingto have bag doggy the must quality/s What hy? Comment citer cedocument: Sub ------
themes
Ethicalconcerns Motivations/ concerns Environmental Motivations/ Image Behavior Attitude Awareness The
content analysis and coding of the data were performed were data the of coding and analysis content f food waste? Where is the biggest food loss from your from loss food biggest the is Where waste? food f e.g. what do you think of food waste? In your opinion your In waste? food of think you do what e.g.
retail
r restaurants or hunger people, poor Ethics, organic environment, planet, concern, waste Food Negative/positive Alreadyused/neverused interesting Good notknow Know/do heard.Heard/never mainand sub themes - great idea great
…
andtranscribed ) - I general In ? option;
- themes , in order inorder , r you are .
)
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' about whether or not the food would really be eaten later. The concept is clear and and clear is concept The later. eaten 6 be really would food the not or whether about doubts had still some if even approved was idea general The waste. food avoiding to link its there. ( respondents, 1989). Sheth, and (Ram offering existing or expectation an meet would that value distinctive a provide bag Few concept. bag doggy the towards a is samples both in result first The 4.1 4. Negativeemotions preventing useDB Barriers restaurants Appropriate
“ Only1 I'm sure it's great when you're not hungry or you hurry somewhere. You're sorry to leave it it You'releave somewhere. hurryto sorry you or hungry you'renot whengreat sure it's I'm Res
Theattitude ( 1
It is a good option good a is It earchfindings
C
Czech respondentand2 French zech respondent zech
15
- French respondents) French behavior
Comment citer cedocument:
” , 3 French respondents) French 3 ,
gap (CR17) ------
demographics Socio Financialconcerns Motivations/ Anticipated Immediate Qualityconcerns Socialnorms education Culture, Country Scale respondents had neither positive nor negative attitude ) .
Indeed, almost every one one every almost Indeed, 6
declared concern for food waste and a and waste food for concern declared
-
have a positive attitude attitude positive a have respondents
n h cnrr, m contrary, the On
. For them, For .
are not interested in the concept of doggy of concept the in interested not are
Guilt, Shame,dare safeConservation, problems,normal trouble,Customs,rude, parents Tradition,history, family, cuisine International/local,typical popular,portions scale/fine Lower dining, Young/old,man/woman money,value food rich/poor,Price, status, regret
the doggy bag doggy the towards the doggy bag concept bag doggy the towards could understand its utility and and utility its understand could , sorry ,
dissatisfaction a s o them of ost
does not not does positive attitud positive
( 18 with the the with seem to to seem
Czech e Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' they arethey throwto going awayit think to sick me makes It restaurant. good very a in end the till dish good very a eat cannot packed be ambiguou is food of value the (FR3). lunch a have people category. lowerprice a is bagsdoggy it. leave will who one the than money, secure. financially status. higher of the of status: financial and/or respondents Czech Customers 4.2 p the for least once hadat asked withth contrast In away" organic. eating is and friendly away food throw to sorry describedas are all by understandable Perceptions of customers and restaurants adopting doggy bags Perceptionsofcustomersdoggy restaurants and adopting erceptionsbagsadoptingdoggy ofrestaurants customersand company at the age of 30 of age the at company (FR7) "It is normal in popular r popular in normal is "It ”
h ak o dgy bag doggy for ask who (FR3) with ; "This is a person whopersonawareisa is "This throwgood"that not is food the away environmentally concerned: environmentally
lowerscalerestaurants. ehp h a el t s o aporae o aehs el ih him. with meal his take to appropriate not is it feel may he Perhaps , is ”
for others, it others, for and
(CR7). positive attitude, attitude, positive menu.
the respondents the “ Comment citer cedocument: 11 The one, who left his food, is definitely a guy. He is maybe a directora maybe is guy.He a definitely is food, his left whoone, The
It's certainly not a fine dining afine not certainly It's
” ” handledbag doggy French respondents French
“
(CR9) (CR8) Someone who will take home the meal is someone wh someone is meal the home take will who Someone s. If for some respondents, high value food seems food value high respondents, some for If s. ” ” - (FR seems to be to seems 40.
estaurant, pub or coffee." coffee." or pub estaurant, (FR13) ; . . s are seen as consumers consumers as seen are s ” “ “ 19
h pro akn fr dgy a i environmentally is bag doggy a for asking person The It onlyone (CR17) .
The per The ) will not be well accepted in a fine dining restaurant."dining fine a in accepted wellbe not will ”
“ ;
A restaurant, where people let their food be packed,beArestaurant,where food their let people
( O sml it simply "Or F too good to be wasted. wasted. be to good too R11) “
. . persons whoareproblem this by concernedpersons and “ , leaving leftovers is clearly a symbol of social social of symbol a clearly is leftovers leaving ,
This attitude This Czech respondent and two French respondents two and respondent Czech The one, who didn who one, The sons who ask for their leftovers to be packed be to leftovers their for ask who sons .
n h sm vein, same the In restaurant.... ’ s someone who never throws food food throws never who someone s - behavior (FR9 ih iaca problems financial with . )
’ . t take his food, is a person a is food, his take t
However, the question of of question the However, “
gap can be explained by beexplained cangap It is awful when I really whenI awful is It It is a is It r es pondent restaurant,where “ s to ( associated associated o has less less has o o F . .
R1) good to to good F
or or He is He .
16
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' French has trouble to raise his hand and demand to pack the leftovers from his plate." plate." hisfrom leftovers the pack to demand and hand his raise troubleFrenchto has it take to want they if even plate, the on it leave and ashamed addition In (FR7) it." to used not we're just restaurant, the to go we When customs. French and history the influence also norms social Descriptive (CR8). food. of God. ofgift a breadis that said was finishin to used aretraditionally people adapted. America. with comparison them. for relevant not is it concept, Respondents 4.3 respondents the highlights differences the between reasons, these Behind big. too often are portions restaurants French or Czech in (2) and (1) main reasons: two askacceptablerestauranttoChinesefor." a is it Indian, an pizzeria, portion. huge a was them cuisine. Czech restaura in acceptable not were bags doggy that believed also respondents The Declared . ” (CR9). (CR9).
nts They almost threw nothing away.threwnothing almost They
Czechs generally do not like to eat the same meal twice. meal same the eat to like not do generally Czechs ngtv eoin ae xrse, any meit s immediate mainly expressed, are emotions negative , u were but
obstacles evoke their education and culture to explain that if the doggy bag is a good good a is bag doggy the if that explain to culture and education their evoke “
I did it in a Chinese restaurant or in a Thai restaurant.ChineseinThai a restauranta it Idid in or Italian meals are better because they are already are they because better are meals Italian
And I think I did it even in a pizzeria with half of a pizza. a of half with pizzeria a in even it did I think I And
r Czech or Frenchdishes or Czech lvn o elevant to the adoption of doggy bagsadoptionofdoggy the to Comment citer cedocument:
There is not an inclination to ask for it. for ask to inclination an not is There
etuat prin ae oe dpe, hl in while adapted, more are portions restaurants l fr nentoa cuisine. international for nly food culture food
So parents always gave emphasis on the carefulhandling the on emphasisparents gave alwaysSo “ o u i i a completely a is it us For g their meal their g
I I continue in that spirit. that in continue are not adapted to be taken away and re andaway taken be to adapted not are behavior s
alreadybystudied ”
(CR15)
ecie a hbt ( habits as described .
“ I de nt ok o typical for work not does "It I come from a family whereit family a fromcome I away. I do not throw food away.throw food not do I ifrn sye f aig in eating of style different Rozin (2005). Rozin pack to easier is it mixed;
Czech cuisine is not fully fully not is cuisine Czech (FR8). Secondly, in our country country our in Secondly, hame
It was It ”
(CR5) . .
Ms pol are people "Most Respondents zc o French or Czech
a mixture,a which ” I cms from comes "It
. . (CR11).
Te typical "The ’ discourse discourse “ foreign - heated heated (FR5).
"In a"In ga ve ). ” ”
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' preventingpro to leading norms social conflicting highlights study this consumers increase may guilt anticipated and norms social that showing studies previous confirm thus findings self the in differences confirms which attribution, internal with associated is food wasting to related regret anticipated the i generates emotions: negative opposite of feeling the to leads norms conflicting encourag norms social concern, environmental and education culture, with relation in norms, Personal emotions. anticipated and immediate regarding one second the and norms regarding one first the emerge: paradoxes related Two 5.1 Discussion 5. (FR18). regret the asking from them values and norms away personal their food with consistent throw to want not do consumers appears: clearly paradox perceived A problems ( strong be to seems pressure ( owner restaurant feel reported Respondents mmediate mmediate Adoubleparadox ( “ )
Of course it is a good idea, but I wouldbutIgood Ofidea, a course isnever even ifdareit Iafterregret it, askingfor ” immediate
(FR13) shame related to to shamerelated
and conclusionand - social ). I' nt ue u clual i' nt normal. not it's culturally but rude not "It's ’
ethical intentions and pro and intentions ethical shame behavior between conflicting normsbetweenconflictingemotions and etuat customers restaurant e servers to handle their leftovers. leftovers. their handle to servers Comment citer cedocument: encourag ing
but asking for a doggy bag doggya for asking
.
hm i fot f te c other of front in shame
- “ leaving leftoversleaving regulatory function of emotions of function regulatory epe a ad fe te wn t lae ihu making without leave to want they after and pay People e
respondents
o leave to - social
, o t waste to not produc
but at the same time social norms prevent prevent norms social time same the at but is associated with the social context socialcontext the with associated behavior their es ec rsodns el an feel respondents Hence
ustomers but also in front of the the of front in also but ustomers a nticipated regret nticipated leftovers immediate bt t h same the at but ;
but
(Onwezen et al., 2014). al., et (Onwezen , contrary to past research, past to contrary , ”
(F . This paradox between between paradox This . asking for a doggy bag bag doggy a for asking 1) ad h social the and R10)) shame
and/
time, time, as or guilt or
a barrier barrier a ticipated ticipated salient salient o be to while .
The The Our ”
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' etuat prtr coul operators restaurant which by mechanism a be could concept bag doggy the restaurant, of type the to adapted correctly If restaurants. their in guilt and shame as such emotions specific understand better Weger, 2014). and (Seiter leftovers handling ( services individualized r leftovers Handling 5.3 andSirieix,2013). innovation. resist to respondents the leads which identification, social concept consumers. numerous increasingly shame and easy appear to has bags doggy of changewill people failcontext associatedto cha a without intention or motivation of change a why explains which occur, they promote. to wants one that ba doggy the However, shame. as such emotionsnegative and reduce 2004) (Azar, them usingfrom retrievedbenefits a to consumers encourage To 5.2 estaurant customers have a stronger intention to revisit a restaurant when they received received they when restaurant a revisit to intention stronger a have customers estaurant Handling Barriers overcome to . Indeed, the doggy bagdoggy Indeed,the .
and are willing to willing are and gs. Hence, it Hence, gs.
These resultsconfirmThese
leftovers: results
is a service that can be valued by customers. Previous studies showed that that showed studies Previous customers. byvalued be can that service a is also is necessary to act both on existing on both act to necessary is Comment citer cedocument: usefulness, Han and Kim, 2009) and, in particular regarding servers regarding particular inand, 2009) Kim, and Han for the adoption of an innovation such asbag adoptionofansuchdoggy innovationthe the for gnrt a ihr ee o csoe loyalty. customer of level higher a generate d
show that the context itself is a barrier preventing the adoption of of adoption the preventing barrier a is itself context the that show use it use Behavior could be seen as a sociali a as seenbe could ot h dgy a, t s eesr t ehne h perceived the enhance to necessary is it bag, doggy the dopt , but the interviews the but , past research on the resistance to social innovation(Gurviez researchresistance the to on past u results Our limits limits al habits are strongly connected to the context in which which in context the to connected strongly are habits al “ normal andalternatives ’ s habits (Neal et al., 2012) (Nealal., habits et s
Results of this study could assist restaurateurs restaurateurs assist could study this of Results hw ht osmr se itrse in interested seem consumers that show ” ie cetd y tes n nt generating not and others by accepted i.e , also also nnovation, requiring appropriation by by appropriationrequiring nnovation, reveal the lack of appropriation and and appropriation of lack the reveal
behavior h dgy a concept bag doggy the
and on the new the on and . In restaurants, the use Inrestaurants, use the . hs it Thus ’ approach to approach
nge in the the in nge
behavior may be be may
as an an as this this
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' differences since in France there was an attempt to promote the doggy bag concept, but the the but concept, bag doggy the promote to attempt an was there France in since differences differenceexist no that two the from results the between appeared difference strong respondents generalized be cannot that results limitations. of antecedents from exempted not is the it bags, doggy of intentions behavioural about and waste food about attitudes information provide study current the of results the Although 5.4 customersfood amount that so the oftheyget eat. can actually plates smaller with those than food more 135% wasted and more, 45% ate more, 52% served plateslarge with dinersbuffet portions customer the at restaurants waste d However, s s France, how show to celebrity a imply could campaigns foo taking to way rewarding and positive a in suggesting foil a in them package and leftovers high take waiters some States, In United the gift. in valuable restaurants a was it though as bags doggy nice offer automatically bag doggy the make to order In differenttypes ofrestaurants barriers and motivators different on focus to worthwhile afety Limitations andfurtherLimitations research . . a etuat wes n csoes a aot te wy o rdcn fo wse in waste food reducing of ways other adopt may customers and owners Restaurant wareness Oe s One . uch a campaign implying Karl Lagerfeld Lagerfeld Karl implying campaign a uch bags oggy The rm w countries two from tudy first c ampaign limitationsof by s a as be also may Comment citer cedocument:
Wansink between consumers in both countries. both in consumers between
’ was a realwasa succes lvl uh s h osblt o asking/serving of possibility the as such level s . .
. . Thus offering small vs larger pla larger vs small offering Thus wih a rlvn fr h qaiaie td; however, study; qualitative the for relevant was which ,
and appear this mainly . .
a Ittersum Van n particular, In study are inherent in the methodo in the inherent are study not only only not en as seen s.
“ wearing a yellow reflective vest for a for vest reflectiveyellow a wearing trendy “
normal useful to increase awareness increase to useful ( 2013) h sml pplto ws only was population sample the regarding the use of doggy bags doggy of use the regarding ” h s f og bg cn be. can bags doggy of use the d home. In the same vein, public public vein, same the In home. d
” shows u desirabl but
samples, which does not mean not does which samples,
W e could have expected some expected haveWe could tes appears as another option option another as appears tes for example that that example for log , etuat could restaurants e, y
mle o half or smaller used, leading to leadingto used,
bu food about Chinese “ swan
- r end end oad for 4 no no In In ” 0 0 - , , Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' Respondents from Czech Republic from Czech Respondents 1 Appendix needed observations on based immediate interviews.basedInorder on method, collectionin data lieslimitation the full restaurants, popular restaurants of types different between distinction the make should research social full to quick from restaurants, of segments different the between differencesmaking without bags doggy of the propose familiar needed country, estimate to not bag, doggy of concept T French both Czechandcultures ( inrestaurants waste food in reducing effective previo with consistent is difference of lack he purpose of the study the of purpose he
emotions attitudes andattitudes - norms and negative emotions are more salient in full in salient more are emotions negative and norms , which could be extended to other countries where the concept of doggy bag is not not is bag doggy of concept the where countries other to extended be could which , evc rsarns Yt te neves ae lal apa ta prevd barriers, perceived that appear clearly made interviews the Yet, restaurants. service to achieve greater validity achieveto greater
a model a willing to adopt the doggy bag. In order to obtain this result, a q a result, this obtain to order In bag. doggy the adopt to willing n cutis oe aiir ih hs concept this with familiar more countries and n anticipated and ’
s. use. as mediators as
behaviors regarding doggy bags doggyregarding behaviors and test the the test and nte limit Another n n actual an in Comment citer cedocument: - service vs quick service, local vs international restaurants) international vslocal service, quick vs service between these antecedents antecedents betweenthese the with relationships their and antecedents different explore to was mtos n sal and emotions influence ofinfluence already to le i te at ht h seai eoe a restaurant, a evoked scenario the that fact the in lies ation .
restaurant restaurant place an importance on foodandwastingit. not importance an on place and compare compare and concern about f about concern
us results showing that that showing results us et oil om i rsarns f restaurants, in norms social ient setting Wansink ’ use. It could also examinealso could It use. and the the and ih different with h pretg o consumers of percentage the
and . ood waste, waste, ood
This future research should also also should research future This -
attitudes andattitudes VanIttersum service restaurants. restaurants. service education does not appear not does education types culture, social norms socialculture,
, , behaviors regarding regarding behaviors to betterunderstand to uantitative study is study uantitative 2013) of restaurants, restaurants, of the potential role potentialrole the
(fine dining vs vs dining (fine tr studies uture . Thus future Thus In addition, In . . The final The - in each each in service service
are on
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' Appendix 2 Respondents from Francefrom Respondents 2 Appendix CR20 CR19 CR18 CR17 CR16 CR15 CR14 CR13 CR12 CR11 CR10 CR9 CR8 CR7 CR6 CR5 CR4 CR3 CR2 CR1 Respondent
Comment citer cedocument:
Female Sex Female Man Female Female Female Female Female Female Man Female Female Man Female Female Female Female Female Female Man
45 75 23 72 47 25 24 33 24 Age 73 24 25 20 45 24 40 50 31 45 27
College University University College College University University College University Education University College University College University University College University University College University
Worker Retired Student Retired Worker Student Student Worker Student Occupation Retired Student Student Student Worker Student Worker Worker Student Worker Worker
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers'
FR20 FR19 FR18 FR17 FR16 FR15 FR14 FR13 FR12 FR11 FR10 FR9 FR8 FR7 FR6 FR5 FR4 FR3 FR2 FR1 Respondent
Comment citer cedocument:
Woman Sex Woman Woman Woman Woman Man Man Man Woman Woman Woman Woman Man Man Man Woman Man Woman Woman Woman
23 22 21 23 23 21 20 60 23 Age 40 51 54 63 32 45 22 21 21 21 45
University University University University University University University University University Education University University University College University University University University University University College
Student Student Student Student Student Student Student Worker Student Occupation Worker Worker Worker Retired Worker Worker Student Student Student Student Worker
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' 280. waitresses clothes. tipswith red to & C. Jacob, (2014). Guéguen,N., QuarterlyAdministrationRestaurant Linen Hotels' Improving on Perspective Psychology So Invoking (2007). B. R. Cialdini, & V., Griskevicius, J., N. Goldstein, internalizationofnorms, (2003) Gintis,H., 379. wine tourism:Port Thecase cellars. of DimensionsM. &(2016). Cruz, Fernandes, and T., in outcomes ofexperiencequality o society: householdfoodwaste, sociological to approach throwaway the Beyond (2012), D. Evans, purchase foods. intentions on to sourced sustainably &foodmotivationschoice(2013).ethicalK.,TheBurke, K. influenceJ. values Dowd, and of manipulativecredibilityintent. perceived and A.,M.disrupting &R. Coulter,(2005). J., EnhancingMoore, Cotte, guilt:Therole ofor ad health Bui, industry serviceFoodA.,waste Buchli,in(2015). food Göbel,&C., Müller, Betz, C. Swiss J., the Economic Journalof evolve? they how and norms social sustains What (2004). H. O. Azar, References
M., - related –
Magnitude and potential for reduction.for potentialMagnitudeand 2009, 2009,
decisions. Consumer . The.hitchhiker Behavior Comment citer cedocument:
University Journal of Theoretical Biology Journalof
regret
&
’
Organization Clothingmoreandgive patronstippingcolor gentlemen s guide to altruism: to guide sgene regulation: Journal of Hospitality &Hospitality Journalof TourismResearch
of , ,
48 Arkansas, Journal of Retailing andConsumer Journalof Retailing (2), 145 (2),
Journal examining , , Sociology 54
WasteManagement - Arkansas, 150. (1), 49 (1), Appetite
of of BusinessResearch - Reuse Programs. Programs. Reuse 220, 407 220,
- , 46, 41 46, , the 64. - rdinary domestic practice and a a and practice domestic rdinary
culture coevolution a culture United
,
effects 69 , 137 , – –
56 418 States. , ,
35 - of
144.
, 218 , : The case of tipping. tipping. of case The : anticipated cial Norms A Social Social A Norms cial
Cornell Hotel and and Hotel Cornell
Services , , 58 - 226. , , (3), 361 (3), 38 nd the (2), 275 (2),
, ,
31 r egret , 371 , - 368. -
on -
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' Conceptualization and proposition for a measuringa forscale, EMAC, ConceptualizationOsloand 45th proposition G. Borgne Le behaviour A comprehensiveA.(2013). model Klöckner,C. psyc of the Hospitality Journalof Management International eco select to intentions 4 (1977) Kassarjian,H. Research Mehrabian extended an of Application and emotions, quality, Perceived (2009). Y. Namkung, & S., S. Jang, andgiving. charitable Persuas Guilt appeals: (2007). F. Ireland, & A., Davies, A., Smith, S., Hibbert, Management barriers. switching and emotions of roles The intention: B. (2009). Barrett, & K.J., Back, Han,H., perspective. (2009). W. Kim, & H., Han, Sweden waste.losses food food and Gustavs Edition) problems for L. Sirieix & P., Gurviez ,
, 8 1, - . 18 s ,
on, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Globalvan& Meybeck,Cederberg, Sonesson,A.J.,(2011). Otterdijk,C., R., U., on, , , 28, 25 — i, . . Nie D, Hancer & D., Njite, J., Y. Kim, 62 A meta A Journal of Travel &Travel Journalof TourismMarketing (4), 451 (4), ,
28 f ar rd diffusion, Trade Fair of , , - 45 (4),563 Sirieix,
- analysis. - . 460.
Psychology &Psychology Marketing Content analysis in consumer research,analysisContent in consumer Comment citer cedocument:
- -
redy etuat: umnig h ter o planned of theory the Augmenting restaurants: friendly L., L., 572.
(2013), Resistance to a social innovation social a to Resistance (2013), SwedishFoodand Institute for
Global Environmental Change Environmental Global &
Outcomes Costa S. , – Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English (English Marketing en Applications et Recherche Russell model to restaurants. restaurants. to model Russell
Influencing factors on restaurant customers restaurant on factors Influencing
M (03. niiae eoin n consumers in emotion Anticipated (2013). M. , ( o 2016 Rltoa Bnft: etuat Customers' Restaurant Benefits: Relational f , , 24 , 34 ) (8), 723 (8), .
, , , 255 , osmrs ocr Fr od Waste: Food For Concern Consumer's 26 (8),820 International Journal of Hospitality of Journal International - 262. - Biotechnology(SIK),Gothenburg, 742. hology ofenvironmental , , 23 Journal of Consumer Research Journalof
- (5),1028 835.
: An analytic framework analytic An :
behavior - ora o Business of Journal 1038.
ion knowledge knowledge ion
l intentions: al behavior ’ revisit revisit ’ . . ,
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' well incrossmeaninga lives:(2005).Thefood Rozin, our ofP. itsandsolutions, Sciences S. Ram Biological B: wastebehaviours, 43 ConservationResources food 79, Recycling, London Stun MarshE., E., T. Quested of Society 2050. to change for potential and quantification Bar J., Parfitt, PsychologyEnvironmental Journalof self the in differences Cultural choices: (2014). G. Antonides, & J., Bartels, C., M. Onwezen, Psychology inPerceivedtriggersactuallife.of habitsand daily W.,do&How habitsLabrecque, Lally, T.,Wood, S., behavior? (2012). P. Neal, guide J. D. Management Do equity formation: brand on practices green restaurant of Effects (2013). S. S. Jang, & Y., Namkung, sourcebook (1994).&B.,Huberman,A. M. M. Miles, bags 3 Why (2014). Melvin,French Don J. The Se -
p being. , 05 from 2015, t, &
Sheth , , . Journal of nutrition educationbehaviornutritionand Journalof 48 Sage. , , 33 thel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: chains: supply food within waste Food (2010). S. Macnaughton, & M., thel, (2), (2),
, , 85 ,
Journalof re patcs ely matter? really practices green
J.N. (1989), Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem Problem Marketing The Innovations: to Resistance Consumer (1989), J.N. 492 - 95. http://www.thelocal.fr/20140226/heres - Comment citer cedocument: 498.
ConsumerMarketing ell D., Parry A.D. (2013), A.D. Parry ellD., , , 40 ’ t Do Restaurant Do t - , 239 , regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. guilt. and pride anticipated of function regulatory Qualitative data analysis:Anexpanded Qualitative data - 248. , 6, 2, 52, 6, , Journal of Journalof Social Experimental
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Royal the of Transactions Philosophical nentoa Junl f Hospitality of Journal International , ,
Spaghetti soup: the complex world of of world complex the Spaghettisoup: 37 “ – consumer friendly Environmentally Doggy Bags.Doggy -
culturaleatingperspective on and , S107 , 14. - why , ,
- - - the S112. 51. 365 -
french 15) 3065 (1554), ”
The Local The - dont - u .
se Retrieved Retrieved - doggy - 3081. -
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' ofexperiences.consumer &Okumus,R.,Kwun, J. Wang, Y. A.R., F., Walls, D. ScientistBehavioral Greenselfish commonfor (2011). the Thøgersen,J. shoppingor good?. reasons consume (2015).sustainableThe& impact on A.,Manganari,Theotokis, ofarchitecture choice E. levels.pdf foodwaste Publications/EstimatesofEuropean Levels Waste (2016). G. Moates, & T., Quested, C., Jensen, Å., Stenmarck, Guilt.Anticipated & S., Steenhaut, Leftovers. Tipping Between Relationship Psychology inandBehaviorofRestaurants Tipping Dining Size Party on J.S., &Sex H. (2010). ofWeger of TheGeneralizedSeiter, Server, Effect Jr, Compliments, consumer Exploring (2010). A. Kralj, & inUS. perceptions the green restaurants of D., Solnet, J., Kandampully, F., Schubert, service responses complaint experiences. to emot consumers' on justice perceived of impact The (2005). C. Ennew, & K., Schoefer, Psychologicalscience paradox. French the explain help States United the in than France in sizes portion smaller Seiter, J. S., & Weger, H. (2014 H. Weger, & S., J. Seiter, & C., Fischler, E., Pete, K., Kabnick, P., Rozin, r behavior:The roleofr guilt. Journal of Hospitality &Hospitality Journalof Tourism Research , 40(1), 1 40(1), , Sokom Retrieved Stockholm. .
Van Kenhove, P. (2006). The Mediating in Consumers Consumers in Mediating The (2006). P. Kenhove, Van Journal of Journalof Business Ethics , , - 55 12. , , 14 Comment citer cedocument: (8),1052
(5), 450 (5), International Journal of Journalof Management Hospitality International - ). The Principle of Reciprocity in Hospitality Contexts The The Contexts Hospitality in Reciprocity of Principle The ). - 1076. Behavior 454. Journal of BusinessJournalof Ethics
Tourism and HospitalityTourismand Research from Journal of Services Journalof Marketing , , n Fo Servers Food and 69 (3), 269 (3), http://www.eu Shields, C. (2003). The ecology of eating eating of ecology The (2003). C. Shields, , 1096348014562425. , W.An view(2011). epistemological –
288. , ,
Journal of Applied Social Journalof Applied
, , Estimates of European Food Food European of Estimates ’ - 131 prahs o Handling to Approaches fusions.org/phocadownload/ (2), 423 (2), , , , , 19
’ 30 , , - of Ethical Role 437. (5),261 10 (1), 10 (1), American (4), 286 (4),
- - 21. 270. - ional
300.
Version postprint attitudes towardsdoggy bagsinrestaurants: Concern aboutfoodwaste, culture,norms andemotions. Sirieix, L., Lála,J.,Kocmanová, K.(2017). Understanding theantecedents ofconsumers' into anxieties practice the of domesticprovisioning, M., Watson, Psychology:Applied normswin and &Van B., me:PortionIttersum,Wansink,plate K.size(2013). & - win solutions for reducingforfood solutionswin
Meah, A. (2013), Food, waste and safety: negotiating conflicting social social conflicting negotiating safety: and waste Food, (2013), A. Meah, , , 19 Comment citer cedocument: (4),320.
intakeand waste. TheSociological Review - size inducedsizeconsumption Journal of Journalof Experimental , 60, 102 60, , - 120.