DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning for Cherwell to 2040 Community Involvement Paper July 2020 Response from North Oxfordshire Green Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning for Cherwell to 2040 Community Involvement Paper July 2020 Response from North Oxfordshire Green Party September 2020 Planning for Cherwell to 2040 Community Involvement Paper July 2020 Response from North Oxfordshire Green Party NORTH OXFORDSHIRE GREEN PARTY SEPTEMBER 2020 The North Oxfordshire Green Party (NOGP) is the branch of the Green Party of England and Wales covering Cherwell. Our members in the three main conurbations of Cherwell as well as those living in the surrounding villages have considered the document ‘Planning for Cherwell to 2040’ and their responses are included in this document. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS There are specific responses to some of the main questions posed in the community involvement paper as well as general observations. Our main focus is naturally on the issues relating to climate change and environmental protection, but the GPEW also has a strong policy stance on housing, particularly affordable housing, as well as place making and the provision of sustainable infrastructure. We are also keen to support small local businesses and vibrant town centres, but this is as part of an overall approach to organic economic growth, rather than pursuing growth for its own sake. GROWTH The main theme of the involvement paper seems to be a continuation of Cherwell’s pursuit of growth whilst at the same time trying to represent this as ‘sustainable’. The terms ‘sustainable growth’ is in large part an oxymoron. Growth can never be maintained indefinitely, and whilst we would support the maintenance of a thriving economy, in an area like Oxfordshire growth needs to be managed, rather than pursued. This is particularly the case in a district like Cherwell where growth has outstripped the national average by a very large margin. One valuable lesson that we must learn from the experience of the pandemic is that businesses may not need huge, expensive premises to operate from in the future. This goes for almost all businesses, with the possible exception of some service industries and the manufacturing sector. Many more people will be working from home than has been the case in the past. By 2040 this may be a much more entrenched position. We need to be planning for better communication infrastructures such as fibre broadband and 5G across all areas, including those harder-to-reach rural sectors, in order to facilitate what is likely to be a more established mode of remote working. This should in many cases be a priority above the provision of more traditional modes of travel and communications. RETAIL We would support measures aimed at helping smaller retailers. We do not support the spending of huge sums on shopping centres such as Banbury’s Castle Quay Shopping Centre. This has been promoted as a regeneration project when in fact the focus has been on maintaining a development that services larger retailers almost exclusively. Areas like Banbury, Bicester and Kidlington all have a good independent retail offer, but these businesses need more targeted support. This is likely to be even more the case in 2040 when it’s predicted that more that half of all retail sales will be made online. That figure may be even greater once the impact of COVID-19 is factored in. Other 1 | P a g e global crises such as climate change may also have an impact by then, especially if we have not achieved local targets of zero carbon by 2030. GREEN SPACES There are numerous references to ‘green space’, ‘green infrastructure’ and ‘green belt’ within the document; however it seems apparent, from both the overriding focus on growth and the industrial strategy, that these important aspects of our environment are liable to be sacrificed at the first opportunity. For example, paragraph 1.2 makes reference to ensuring that developments do not do harm, respond to climate change, avoid pollution, improve biodiversity and the provision of sustainable transport modes. All these things could be done using the current local plan and national policy frameworks, yet it’s clear from previous behaviour that these things are not a real priority for Cherwell. TRUST The document makes only one specific response to Cherwell’s recent partial review which was adopted by the council on 7th September after considerable opposition from local and national campaigners and local residents. The proposals that were eventually pushed through by the administration as a result of that review will result in huge destruction of a large area of green belt in south Cherwell, along with the building of more roads and the expansion of existing business areas such as the Begbroke Science Park, which in turn will result in the obliteration of two ancient and distinct villages. References in paragraph 1.20 to ‘maintenance of local distinctiveness’ and in para 1.21 calling for villages and hamlets to ‘retain their traditional character’ will ring very hollow with the people of Begbroke, Yarnton, Gosford and Water Eaton. The single reference to this highly contentious and far reaching decision by the council is an attempt to exclude it from discussion as part of this consultation. While it’s clear that the current administration would be keen for that to be the case, future planning policy cannot be seen in isolation from the council’s past actions. Trust and good will form a major part of any planning policy; it now seems clear to the people of south Cherwell that their council cannot be trusted and shows very little good will towards residents there. In that context it is very difficult to take seriously any of the aspirations towards the protection of green spaces and the amenity of local residents that are espoused in this document, when the council’s recent actions stand as proof of their total lack of genuine concern for such values. CURRENT POLICIES Comments in paragraphs such as 1.14 which refers to ‘safe green spaces’ and ‘Green Belt strategies’ in 1.35 would also seem to be simple window dressing. The reference in 2.4c to an 2 | P a g e ‘environmental objective’ is all very laudable, but seems far from the true aspirations of the current administration. Moreover, many of the policies and aims that are listed in connection with environmental matters and zero carbon development are already present in the current local plan; yet rarely, if at all, are they applied to planning applications. These policies are usually dismissed during the consideration of such applications as mere ‘aspirations’ that would not stand up to a planning appeal. If that is the case, it’s difficult to see how they would be given more ‘teeth’ in the future and if those teeth would even be used, were they available to the planning committee. This would seem to be unlikely in cases where these values are seen as obstacles to growth or in opposition to the industrial strategy. EMERGING POLICY There is a single reference in 2.6 to the government’s emerging policies on planning which, if they go ahead in their current form, will make much of this consultation redundant. Much more focus is needed on that aspect, and there is the argument that expending further effort and expense on a consultation at this point is foolhardy, especially given that these proposals would not become policy for another 20 years. OXFORD/CAMBRIDGE ARC There is much mention of the so-called ‘knowledge spine’ and the ‘Oxford to Cambridge Arc’, both rather worrying aspects coming from the only council in Oxfordshire that refused to condemn the building of the Oxford to Cambridge Expressway, a project universally opposed and panned by environmental campaigners across the region. It’s also worth noting that as chair of the ‘Arc Leaders’ Group’ the current leader of Cherwell District Council has some part to play in this project. It’s worrying that repeated references to this notional arc and the connectivity between the two cities is another recurring theme allied to the theme of growth. It’s difficult not to see such references as an attempt to keep the idea of the expressway alive, even though it has been suspended by national government. NOGP feels it would be as well to set the record straight on this once and for all, making CDC’s policy on the expressway clear. The building of a motorway is not compatible with the council’s climate change emergency motion. FARMLAND There are several references in the document to protecting farmland in the pursuit of food security. The NOGP would wholeheartedly support this aim, but again CDC has not shown good faith on this aspiration so far. Building on green areas usually involves the removal of large swathes of good farming land. This is particularly the case in south Cherwell, where dozens of acres of grade 2 farmland are about to be concreted over. 3 | P a g e BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The table on Page 20 contains a list of rather vague priorities including references to such things as ‘biodiversity offsetting’. The Green Party regards any sort of offsetting as dodging responsibility. The reference to ‘natural capital mapping’ is again a great phrase, but this needs more detail. Green councillor Ian Middleton has already suggested that a register of important trees should be compiled, but has been told that there are no resources to carry this out. If that is the case, then including items like this in that table is pointless. The reference to ‘green infrastructure networks’ also needs more explanation. It also includes an aspiration to protect areas where development is inappropriate. The Green Belt would seem to be a perfect example of such an area, yet, as already mentioned, Cherwell has done very little to protect that and has instead actively pursued the opposite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Information Notes and Symbols
    General Information Notes and Symbols This timetable includes all Chiltern Railways services On Mondays to Fridays you can also use most of There are no restrictions on folding bikes at any GW Great Western Railway between Banbury, Kings Sutton, Bicester North, our trains, with the exception of our busiest peak time, provided they are fully folded. For information t Trains with tables and power points Bicester Village, Haddenham & Thame Parkway and hour services. For the safety and comfort of all our about cycle storage facilities at our stations see our ; Hybrid train comprised of both silver and London Marylebone. Great Western Railway services passengers bikes are not allowed at any point during website. commuter carriages between Banbury and Kings Sutton are also included. the journey on any train: / Silver train including Business Zone carriage Other services also run between Banbury, Cycles can be hired from just outside a Bicycles are not permitted on board at any point Kings Sutton and Bicester Village (via Oxford) to • Arriving at London Marylebone, Oxford or London Marylebone station. For information visit during this service London Paddington. Birmingham Moor Street from 0745 to 1000. www.tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cycles. e Continued in later column • Leaving London Marylebone, Oxford or f Continued from earlier column Off-Peak Travel Birmingham Moor Street from 1630 to 1930. Safety Information a Arrival time h First train to London available for holders of Off- • Non-folding bicycles are not permitted for In almost all emergency situations it is safest to stay b Departure time only. Change at Banbury for the Peak Day Return, Off-Peak Return, Off-Peak and Day any part of the journey on the train that leaves on the train and then listen for instructions from a connecting service departing at 0724 Travelcards (includes unlimited travel on London’s Bicester North at 0623 on weekday mornings, member of staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Job 124253 Type
    A SPLENDID GRADE II LISTED FAMILY HOUSE WITH 4 BEDROOMS, IN PRETTY ISLIP Greystones, Middle Street, Islip, Oxfordshire OX5 2SF Period character features throughout with an impressive modern extension and attractive gardens Greystones, Middle Street, Islip, Oxfordshire OX5 2SF 2 reception rooms ◆ kitchen/breakfast/family room ◆ utility ◆ cloakroom ◆ master bedroom with walk-in wardrobe and en suite shower room ◆ 3 additional bedrooms ◆ play room ◆ 2 bathrooms ◆ double garage ◆ gardens ◆ EPC rating = Listed Building Situation Islip mainline station 0.2 miles (52 minutes to London Marylebone), Kidlington 2.5 miles, M40 (Jct 9) 4.2 miles, Oxford city centre 4.5 miles Islip is a peaceful and picturesque village, conveniently located just four miles from Oxford and surrounded by beautiful Oxfordshire countryside. The village has two pubs, a doctor’s surgery and a primary school. The larger nearby village of Kidlington offers a wide range of shops, supermarkets and both primary and secondary schools. A further range of excellent schools can also be found in Oxford, along with first class shopping, leisure and cultural facilities. Directions From Savills Summertown office head north on Banbury Road for two miles (heading straight on at one roundabout) and then at the roundabout, take the fourth exit onto Bicester Road. After approximately a mile and a quarter, at the roundabout, take the second exit and continue until you arrive in Islip. Turn right at the junction onto Bletchingdon Road. Continue through the village, passing the Red Lion pub, and you will find the property on your left-hand side, on the corner of Middle Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Kidlington YARNTON, GOSFORD and WATER EATON WARD
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WARDINGTON CP TH E E M ET V O Council RE A O ST RS Offices N K AI PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHERWELL M R A M P A PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHERWELL R L T B S CROPREDY WARD O Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Kidlington R H O C U R G U August 2001 Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Banbury H H B A A C N V KIDLINGTON NORTH WARD B E August 2001 U Hanwell R Y BOURTON CP R Hanwell O A Castle D ST MARY'S PARISH WARD St Peter's D Church A O R Recreation M A Ground H T U W O S IS Ch E A V HANWELL CP E N U G E U D L Cemetery A L I O C R O AD E T O R G E D W A A E L M R A I N L BE A N S C E I D V O N W H A M A IL R Y L ROUNDHAM PARISH WARD D ST WROXTON W R E I KIDLINGTON CP C ET K WARD H I L L School D L A Y RO Y N y UR M l a B E T A l N E A 4 w B E e il R R 4 0 a ST 2 w r R O H 3 IG e d A H h e tl D C n B a r m e e s g E KIRTLINGTON v i b i X D r R o E k T G e W E R WARD A L R R a E W n R E e O N IC K A R B R D O A O A S A D D S E T HAMPTON GAY W Recreation A W Y A AND POYLE CP Ground TE R M E A D C A R 4 l O 2 ana W 6 d C 0 or N Oxf R O L AVE A L Ch ERWE D CH Nature Reserve TH ORCHARD PARISH WARD E PHEL C PS ROFT AVENUE R D o Council A w O e R Offices l O H B M X ER r F E A FO o O RD H o R T k D W U R O A O A Y S D Playing KIDLINGTON SOUTH E SP N RI A NG Field L F S IE L E WARD D N D R V A RD I HIG BE M V R HLANDS AUMO I NT R BEGBROKE CP E E D OAD H N H E G EXETER PARISH WARD L YARNTON, GOSFORD R B ourse W U HARDWICK WARD ILD B M D ERE R
    [Show full text]
  • Banbury and Bicester College
    Sharing Innovative Approaches to Delivering 16-19 Study Programme Principles Banbury and Bicester College Enterprise and Employability “At the heart of our model for Study Programmes is the development of employability skills through the learning company concept.” Rose Turner, Principal Banbury and Bicester College is part of Activate Learning1, a group which combines secondary, further and higher education along with workforce training, commercial business and social enterprise. The Activate Learning group was formed in September 2013, following the merger of Oxford and Cherwell Valley College, and Reading College in 2010. The group comprises Banbury and Bicester College, City of Oxford College, Reading College and Activate Enterprise. Activate Learning has a chief executive officer; each college has a principal and Activate Enterprise a director. In 2012/13 the three colleges recruited around 14,500 learners, two thirds of whom were adults on part-time courses. Most learners, currently, are on foundation and intermediate programmes and the group have around 1,800 apprentices in five subject areas. Oxfordshire and Berkshire are affluent counties with rates of unemployment below national averages. However, across both counties, there are areas of educational and social deprivation and the profile of learners attending the colleges reflects this. GCSE attainment in local secondary schools is broadly at, or just below, national averages, and many learners come to study and train at the colleges with attainment below national averages. The proportion of the population of Oxfordshire and Berkshire from minority ethnic backgrounds varies from around 25% in Reading to below 5% in Banbury and Bicester. However, the proportion of learners from minority ethnic backgrounds in the colleges matches or exceeds these local proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/01929/CM Ward: Yarnton, Gosford and Water Eaton Date Valid
    Application No: Ward: Yarnton, Date Valid: 23 10/01929/CM Gosford and Water December 2010 Eaton Applicant: Hanson Aggregates Site Worton Rectory Farm, Cassington Road, Yarnton Address: Proposal: The continuation of the winning and working of sand and gravel with restoration using suitable imported materials without complying with the requirements of condition 2 in order to extend the time period for extraction until December 2015 and the time period for restoration until December 2017 to allow sufficient time for the working of material from beneath the plant site (OCC ref. MW.0175/10) 1. Site Description and Proposal 1.1 The site forms part of Cassington Quarry at Worton Rectory Farm at Yarnton, to the south of the Cassington Road. The site is situated to the south of an access track, which leads to access to the A40. The area has been used for the extraction of sand and gravel and land to the south of this site has been restored to lakes. The site is situated within the Oxford Green Belt and has ecological potential. The site is also within the flood plain. 1.2 This application seeks planning permission to continue the existing operation of winning and working of sand and gravel and to eventually restore the land without complying with condition 2 of the original planning permission to allow the time period for extraction until December 2015 and for restoration until December 2017. Condition 2 currently reads: 1.3 Planning History 02/00602/CM Non compliance with condition 22 of Permission W1132/83C and CHS 458/83 to read No imported waste shall be deposited on the land apart from the area outlined in red on plan W92m/50a 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Clifton Past and Present
    Clifton Past and Present L.E. Gardner, 1955 Clifton, as its name would imply, stands on the side of a hill – ‘tun’ or ‘ton’ being an old Saxon word denoting an enclosure. In the days before the Norman Conquest, mills were grinding corn for daily bread and Clifton Mill was no exception. Although there is no actual mention by name in the Domesday Survey, Bishop Odo is listed as holding, among other hides and meadows and ploughs, ‘Three Mills of forty one shillings and one hundred ells, in Dadintone’. (According to the Rev. Marshall, an ‘ell’ is a measure of water.) It is quite safe to assume that Clifton Mill was one of these, for the Rev. Marshall, who studied the particulars carefully, writes, ‘The admeasurement assigned for Dadintone (in the survey) comprised, as it would seem, the entire area of the parish, including the two outlying townships’. The earliest mention of the village is in 1271 when Philip Basset, Baron of Wycomb, who died in 1271, gave to the ‘Prior and Convent of St Edbury at Bicester, lands he had of the gift of Roger de Stampford in Cliftone, Heentone and Dadyngtone in Oxfordshire’. Another mention of Clifton is in 1329. On April 12th 1329, King Edward III granted a ‘Charter in behalf of Henry, Bishop of Lincoln and his successors, that they shall have free warren in all their demesne, lands of Bannebury, Cropperze, etc. etc. and Clyfton’. In 1424 the Prior and Bursar of the Convent of Burchester (Bicester) acknowledged the receipt of thirty-seven pounds eight shillings ‘for rent in Dadington, Clyfton and Hampton’.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Held at Exeter Hall, Kidlington on Tuesday 2Nd April 2019 at 7.00Pm
    Meeting held at Exeter Hall, Kidlington on Tuesday 2nd April 2019 at 7.00pm MINUTES OF THE MEETING Meeting commenced 19.00 Councillors Present – Cllr M Billington (Chairman), Cllr C Stayt (Vice Chairman), Cllr M Smith, Cllr E Walton, Cllr N Prestidge Also in Attendance – Clerk to the Council (K East), Barwood Homes developer representatives (x3) To receive apologies for absence – Cllr S Wilson-Higgins and Cllr C Matheson 19/411 Declarations of interest: - Cllr M Smith declared his interest in the land that we may discuss within planning. 19/412 Barwood Homes Developers – Keith Fenwick with two colleagues from Barwood Homes attended the meeting to discuss the proposed housing developments and how the hearing went. Issues that came out of the hearing, main principle focuses: whether the right housing need figure had been identified by the council and the second was whether the greenbelt release was the best way to find the land needed, are there special circumstances. The second week of the hearing discussed the site specifics primarily. Two of the sites had significant objection. The land towards Oxford by the park and ride and PR8 towards Yarnton / Begbroke both reached the strongest objection. The site towards Woodstock also had significant objections. At the hearing Barwood promoted an inspection to the site for an additional 100 units but the inspector made it clear this was not for him to discuss. The local authority would make this decision if additional housing were required. The inspector was testing for soundness the plan proposed. There is a joint strategic plan coming for examination in 2022, this plan will identify needs beyond that date but this was debated.
    [Show full text]
  • Land & Buildings at Piddington
    LAND & BUILDINGS AT PIDDINGTON Vicarage Lane, Piddington, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX25 1QA Land and Buildings at Piddington Piddington, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX25 1QA A ring fence block of productive pasture land in large enclosures extending to 37.08 hectares (91.63 acres) and with two Location excellent steel portal framed stock The property is located to the south of Piddington at the end of Vicarage Lane with access from the same. Immediate access to the village is via Thame Lane from the B4011 to the south or Lower End buildings. from the A41 in the north. Piddington is located approximately 2 miles to the south of the A41 and 5 miles from Bicester which provides mainline railway services to London Marylebone with both Junctions 9 and 10 of the M40 very accessible. Bicester 6 miles | Thame 10 miles | Oxford 12 miles A41 2 miles | A34 8.5 miles | M40 (J9) 8.5 miles Directions Bicester Station 5 miles (London Marylebone 56 min) From the Headington Roundabout junction of the A40 in North Oxford proceed north on Baystwater Road past Oxford Crematorium towards Stanton St John for about 2 miles. At the junction with the B4027 turn right then immediately left onto Horton Road which turns into Woodperry Hill. Continue for about 2 miles towards Horton-cum-Studley bearing right in the For sale as a whole by private treaty village and then left onto Brill Road continuing for about 2.5 miles to Boarstall. Leaving the village of Boarstall turn left onto the B4011 turning right after about 1 mile onto About 37.71 hectares (93.19 acres) in total Thame Road which leads to Piddington.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Cherwell Local Plan Partial Review Submission
    Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1): Partial Review - Oxford's Unmet Housing Need Proposed Submission Representation Form B – Gosford and Water Eaton Parish Council Response Part B Forms Gosford and Water Eaton Parish Council : Response to Cherwell Local Plan Partial Review Submission This document sets out our response to the various policies and sections of the Submission Plan and supporting documents. This follows consultation with our parishioners. In response to Question 3 we have no specific comment to make at this time as to whether the Plan is legally and procedurally compliant or is compliant with the duty to cooperate. Our view is that the Plan and supporting documents are not sound in respect of being positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. Our response below sets out for each part of the Plan our reasons and the changes requested. Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1): Partial Review - Oxford's Unmet Housing Need Proposed Submission Representation Form B – Gosford and Water Eaton Parish Council Response Oxford’s Unmet Needs Paras 1.22 -1.33 Reasons We note that the Oxford Growth Board as reported in para. 1.28 of the Submission states: “The Board should note that the working assumption of 15,000 is a working figure to be used by the programme as a benchmark for assessing the spatial options for growth and is not an agreed figure for the true amount of unmet need” This raises two key points. One is that this is the 4400 figure is a working assumption to be tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Meeting of Council
    Public Document Pack Special Meeting of Council Tuesday 27 January 2015 Members of Cherwell District Council, A special meeting of Council will be held at Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA on Tuesday 27 January 2015 at 6.30 pm, and you are hereby summoned to attend. Sue Smith Chief Executive Monday 19 January 2015 AGENDA 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting. 3 Communications To receive communications from the Chairman and/or the Leader of the Council. Cherwell District Council, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX15 4AA www.cherwell.gov.uk Council Business Reports 4 Cherwell Boundary Review: Response to Local Government Boundary Commission for England Draft Recommendations (Pages 1 - 44) Report of Chief Executive Purpose of report To agree Cherwell District Council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s (“LGBCE” or “the Commission”) draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council. Recommendations The meeting is recommended: 1.1 To agree the Cherwell District Council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council (Appendix 1). 1.2 To delegate authority to the Chief Executive to make any necessary amendments to the council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council prior to submission in light of the resolutions of Council.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 Gosford & Water Eaton Parish Council
    PARISH You are welcome to join our monthly meetings. At the COUNCIL moment meetings are held virtually due to Covid 19. Joining details are on our website (and we have a new NEWSLETTER - July 2020 noticeboard at Cromwell Way play area). Our next meeting is on 4th August at 7pm. More Housing to be built around us by 2031 What is this about? It’s about the new housing proposed for Gosford and Gosford & Water Eaton Water Eaton by Cherwell District Council. Parish Council What is happening? Cherwell District Council wants to build between 1410 As you are a resident within GOSFORD AND WATER EATON PARISH we are sending you this newsletter. and 2000 new homes in Gosford and Water Eaton by 2031. This housing is to meet some of Oxford's unmet We hope that you are all well during the uncertainty of housing need. We are currently waiting for the Covid 19. Please be assured that the Parish Council is still inspector’s report – it is due anytime now and we operating as usual and we are holding monthly meetings continue to watch out for this. As soon as we hear, we virtually. Updates are posted regularly on our website. will let you know. A reminder of our parish boundary. Although we nestle How many homes and where will the proposed houses alongside Kidlington we are a very separate parish and be built? are home to Thames Valley Police HQ, Gosford Hill School, Edward Feild School, Gosford Medical Centre, 230 homes may be built on the eastern rural side of Oxford Parkway and Kidlington and Gosford Sports Sainsbury's, and along Water Eaton Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Oxfordshire
    KEY Map referred to in the Oxfordshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2012 ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARY WARD BOUNDARY Sheet 3 of 7 PARISH BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY BICESTER TOWN ED ELECTORAL DIVISION NAME BICESTER NORTH WARD WARD NAME This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of BICESTER CP PARISH NAME the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Scale : 1cm = 0.08000 km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Grid Interval 1km BICESTER WEST PARISH WARD PARISH WARD NAME The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. SHEET 3, MAP 3A Electoral division boundaries in Bicester 1 2 4 4 A CAVERSFIELD CP Airfield Gliding Centre M U L L E I M CAVERSFIELD WARD N ULB ER R RY O A D D R IV E D R M A E B B U C N C BICESTER NORTH ED R R K A O N N E H L E L S (5) B R I O L A L D D R Recreation Ground L U Southwold C E County Primary R N School E S A U N V BICESTER NORTH WARD D S E E K R I N L M U Bardwell School A M N I E D N G BUCKNELL CP E BICESTER NORTH D IV D IS R R H D LIME CRESCENT L E PARISH WARD IV A N E N LA E S R W U IN B P DM U IL C L K AV N EN E U E L E V Glory Farm PLOUGHLEY ED L Bure Park I B R R Primary and Nursery R Primary School D O O W A B E School D A L (13) N L I N I N V B G R U D D E B R R A R M R Y LAUNTON WARD IV R O Y D E R S A L V O The Cooper School D E E A N I A O U D R E F D LAUNTON
    [Show full text]