DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1908.11323V1 [Physics.Bio-Ph] 29 Aug 2019 II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1908.11323V1 [Physics.Bio-Ph] 29 Aug 2019 II Theoretical Perspectives on Biological Machines Mauro L. Mugnai∗ Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Changbong Hyeony Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea Michael Hinczewskiz Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106 D. Thirumalaix Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Many biological functions are executed by molecular machines, which like man made motors consume energy and convert it into mechanical work. Biological machines have evolved to transport cargo, facilitate folding of proteins and RNA, remodel chromatin and replicate DNA. A common aspect of these machines is that their functions are driven by fuel provided by hydrolysis of ATP or GTP, thus driving them out of equilibrium. It is a challenge to provide a general framework for understanding the functions of bi- ological machines, such as molecular motors (kinesin, dynein, and myosin), molecular chaperones, and helicases. Using these machines, whose structures have little resem- blance to one another, as prototypical examples, we describe a few general theoretical methods that have provided insights into their functions. Although the theories rely on coarse-graining of these complex systems they have proven useful in not only accounting for many in vitro experiments but also address questions such as how the trade-off be- tween precision, energetic costs and optimal performances are balanced. However, many complexities associated with biological machines will require one to go beyond current theoretical methods. We point out that simple point mutations in the enzyme could drastically alter functions, making the motors bi-directional or result in unexpected dis- eases or dramatically restrict the capacity of molecular chaperones to help proteins fold. These examples are reminders that while the search for principles of generality in biology is intellectually stimulating, one also ought to keep in mind that molecular details must be accounted for to develop a deeper understanding of processes driven by biological machines. Going beyond generic descriptions of in vitro behavior to making genuine understanding of in vivo functions will likely remain a major challenge for some time to come. In this context, the combination of careful experiments and the use of physics and physical chemistry principles will be useful in elucidating the rules governing the workings of biological machines. CONTENTS IV. Stochastic Kinetic Models 7 A. The Master Equation 8 I. Introduction 2 B. Thermodynamics 9 C. Rate of Entropy Production 10 arXiv:1908.11323v1 [physics.bio-ph] 29 Aug 2019 II. Structures 4 D. Fluctuation Theorems 10 A. Molecular motors 4 B. Catalytic Cycle 5 V. Molecular Motors { Models without Detachment 12 A. Molecular Motors are Processive Enzymes 12 III. Biological machines are active systems. 6 B. Processive Motor Velocity 13 C. Periodic Lattice Model 13 1. One-state Models 14 2. Multi-state, Uni-cycle Models 15 3. Multi-cycle Models 17 ∗ [email protected] D. Additional remark on non-equilibrium nature of y [email protected] motors 18 z [email protected] E. Applications 19 x [email protected] 1. Myosin V and Kinesin-1 19 2 2. Dynein { an erratic motor 20 VI. Molecular Motors { Models with Detachment 20 A. Velocity Distribution 21 B. Alternate Models with Detachment 22 VII. Polymer Physics-based Approaches Incorporating Structural Features Into Kinetic Theories 23 VIII. Simulations using Coarse-Grained Models 28 IX. Cost-precision Trade-off and Efficiency of Molecular Motors 30 1. Cost-precision trade-off and its physical bound of molecular motors 30 2. Transport Efficiency 31 X. Molecular chaperones 33 XI. Universal characteristics of Helicases 36 FIG. 1 Illustration of the complexity of transportation of melanosomes, which are vesicles containing melanin. Both !1 XII. Discussion 38 dynein and kinesin-2 compete for the same binding site on A. Sometimes Details Matter 38 dynactin mediated by p150Glued. Depending on the func- B. Efficiency and optimality 38 tion (aggregation of melanosomes or their dispersion through- C. Specificity versus Promiscuity 39 out the cell) one or the other wins. When melanosomes are D. Biological complexity 39 dispersed in the cell they are transported by kinesin-2 and XIII. A Final remark 39 myosin V whereas when they aggregate dynein moves the cargo. Figure extracted from Soldati and Schliwa (2006). Acknowledgments 40 References 40 and abiotic systems. Because of functional demands in living systems, which also includes adaptation to chang- I. INTRODUCTION ing environmental conditions, it is virtually impossible to fully describe biology without evolutionary considera- The opening sentence of a perspective by Bustamante tions. Although not the focus of our perspective, the role (Bustamante et al., 2011) on the workings of nucleic acid of evolutionary constraints must also be integrated with translocases begins with the quote, \The operative indus- physical models in order to discover general principles try of Nature is so prolific that machines will be eventu- governing the functions of biological machines. ally found not only unknown to us but also unimaginable What are the characteristics of biological machines? by our mind", attributed to Marcello Malpighi, who is First, there are many varieties of machines, all of which considered the founder of microscopic anatomy, histol- should be thought of as enzymes, which consume energy ogy, and embryology. This statement, made over three and perform mechanical work to carry out specific tasks. centuries ago, is even more relevant today. It is a re- A few of the machines that we consider here are kinesin, minder that mechanical forces must play a fundamental myosin, and dynein, which are collectively referred to as role in biology. In modern times this vast subject falls molecular motors (Belyy et al., 2014a; Block, 2007; Reck- under the growing field of mechanobiology. The perva- Peterson et al., 2018; Sun and Goldman, 2011a; Vale sive role of mechanics in living systems controls motil- and Milligan, 2000). These cytoskeletal motors trans- ity on all length scales, from motion of a single cell on port cargo by walking, almost always unidirectionally, a substrate and collections of cells to dynamics at the on filamentous actin and microtubules (MT). Under in molecular level. Cooperative interactions between var- vivo conditions the motors cooperate or there could be a ious modules at the molecular level is thought to con- tug-of-war in the process of transport (see Fig. 1) (Gross trol functions at the mesoscale. A number of complex et al., 2002; Levi et al., 2006). To illustrate the diversity dynamical processes such as transcription, translation, of motor-like functions and point out certain emerging transport of vesicles and organelles, folding of proteins general principles, we also provide theoretical descrip- and RNA, and chromosome segregation control the sus- tions for the functions of molecular chaperones, which tenance and growth of cells. At some level all these bio- assist in the folding of proteins and ribozymes (RNA en- logically important processes involve molecular machines, zymes) that cannot do so spontaneously, and helicases whose ability to perform their functions, often but always with multiple functions that includes separation of dou- with high efficiency, in a noisy crowded environment is ble stranded (ds) DNA strands. Both molecular chap- truly remarkable. It is worth remembering that the abil- erones and helicases bear no structural resemblance or ity to execute a variety of functions distinguishes living sequence similarity to molecular motors. Nevertheless, 3 we are convinced that by comparing the characteristics of these seemingly unrelated machines, integrating the- ory and experiments, unifying themes and differences be- tween them could be elucidated. Second, all these motors and others not covered here (for example polymerases, ribosomes, and packaging motors) are all multidomain proteins, whose architectures are spectacularly different. Despite the vastly different sequences, structures, and evolutionary origins it is indeed the case that all of these machines utilize some form of chemical energy (gener- ated by ATP or GTP hydrolysis) in order to amplify the small local conformational changes through their struc- tural linkages to facilitate large conformational changes for functional purposes. Such conformational amplifica- tions are examples of remarkable allostery or action at a distance, and could also be couched in terms of in- FIG. 2 Significant physical timescales associated with myosin V dynamics, from the coarse-grained polymer theory model formation transfer between structural subunits that are of Hinczewski et al. (2013). spatially well separated, which in some cases (dynein for example (Bhabha et al., 2014)) can be as large as 25nm. A large number of experiments have unveiled many of the details of how these machines move by converting ular dynamics simulations have been performed to get a chemical energy into mechanical work (see for example molecular picture of certain aspects of the functions of (Hartman et al., 2011; Spudich and Sivaramakrishnan, motors (Hwang et al., 2008, 2017) and other machines 2010) (De La Cruz and Ostap, 2004; Holzbaur and Gold- (see for example (Elber and West, 2010; Ma et al., 2000; man, 2010; Sweeney and Houdusse, 2010). A remarkable Stan et al., 2005), the current limitations of such ap- number of experimental methods have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chloroplast Transit Peptides: Structure, Function and Evolution
    reviews Chloroplast transit Although the first demonstration of precursor trans- port into chloroplasts was shown over two decades peptides: structure, ago3,4, only now is this area of cell biology becom- ing well understood. Many excellent reviews have been published recently on the evolution of plas- function and tids5, the evolution of organelle genomes6, the mechanism of gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus7 and the mechanism of protein import into evolution chloroplasts8,9. Proteins destined to plastids and other organ- elles share in common the requirement for ‘new’ Barry D. Bruce sequence information to facilitate their correct trafficking within the cell. Although in most cases this information resides in a cleavable, N-terminal sequence often collectively referred to as signal It is thought that two to three thousand different proteins are sequence, the different organelle-targeting se- targeted to the chloroplast, and the ‘transit peptides’ that act as quences have distinct properties and names: ‘signal peptides’ for the endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast targeting sequences are probably the largest class of ‘presequences’ for the mitochondria and ‘transit peptides’ for chloroplasts and other plastids. This targeting sequences in plants. At a primary structural level, transit review focuses on recent progress in dissecting peptide sequences are highly divergent in length, composition and the role of the stromal-targeting domain of chloro- plast transit peptides. I will consider briefly the organization. An emerging concept suggests that transit peptides multitude of distinct functions that transit peptides contain multiple domains that provide either distinct or overlapping perform, provide an update on the limited struc- tural information of a number of transit peptides functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Loss of Bacterial Flagellar Filaments
    biomolecules Review Construction and Loss of Bacterial Flagellar Filaments Xiang-Yu Zhuang and Chien-Jung Lo * Department of Physics and Graduate Institute of Biophysics, National Central University, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 4 November 2020; Published: 9 November 2020 Abstract: The bacterial flagellar filament is an extracellular tubular protein structure that acts as a propeller for bacterial swimming motility. It is connected to the membrane-anchored rotary bacterial flagellar motor through a short hook. The bacterial flagellar filament consists of approximately 20,000 flagellins and can be several micrometers long. In this article, we reviewed the experimental works and models of flagellar filament construction and the recent findings of flagellar filament ejection during the cell cycle. The length-dependent decay of flagellar filament growth data supports the injection-diffusion model. The decay of flagellar growth rate is due to reduced transportation of long-distance diffusion and jamming. However, the filament is not a permeant structure. Several bacterial species actively abandon their flagella under starvation. Flagellum is disassembled when the rod is broken, resulting in an ejection of the filament with a partial rod and hook. The inner membrane component is then diffused on the membrane before further breakdown. These new findings open a new field of bacterial macro-molecule assembly, disassembly, and signal transduction. Keywords: self-assembly; injection-diffusion model; flagellar ejection 1. Introduction Since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek observed animalcules by using his single-lens microscope in the 18th century, we have entered a new era of microbiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Molecular Motors
    REVIEWS CYTOSKELETAL MOTORS Moving into the cell: single-molecule studies of molecular motors in complex environments Claudia Veigel*‡ and Christoph F. Schmidt§ Abstract | Much has been learned in the past decades about molecular force generation. Single-molecule techniques, such as atomic force microscopy, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and optical tweezers, have been key in resolving the mechanisms behind the power strokes, ‘processive’ steps and forces of cytoskeletal motors. However, it remains unclear how single force generators are integrated into composite mechanical machines in cells to generate complex functions such as mitosis, locomotion, intracellular transport or mechanical sensory transduction. Using dynamic single-molecule techniques to track, manipulate and probe cytoskeletal motor proteins will be crucial in providing new insights. Molecular motors are machines that convert free energy, data suggest that during the force-generating confor- mostly obtained from ATP hydrolysis, into mechanical mational change, known as the power stroke, the lever work. The cytoskeletal motor proteins of the myosin and arm of myosins8,11 rotates around its base at the catalytic kinesin families, which interact with actin filaments and domain11–17, which can cause the displacement of bound microtubules, respectively, are the best understood. Less cargo by several nanometres18 (FIG. 1B). In kinesins, the is known about the dynein family of cytoskeletal motors, switching of the neck linker (~13 amino acids connecting which interact with microtubules. Cytoskeletal motors the catalytic core to the cargo-binding stalk domain) from power diverse forms of motility, ranging from the move- an ‘undocked’ state to a state in which it is ‘docked’ to the ment of entire cells (as occurs in muscular contraction catalytic domain, is the equivalent of the myosin power or cell locomotion) to intracellular structural dynamics stroke10.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Molecular Motor Motility in Electrical Devices
    Control of Molecular Motor Motility in Electrical Devices Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of The University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Laurence Charles Ramsey Department of Electrical Engineering & Electronics April 2014 i Abstract In the last decade there has been increased interest in the study of molecular motors. Motor proteins in particular have gained a large following due to their high efficiency of force generation and the ability to incorporate the motors into linear device designs. Much of the recent research centres on using these protein systems to transport cargo around the surface of a device. The studies carried out in this thesis aim to investigate the use of molecular motors in lab- on-a-chip devices. Two distinct motor protein systems are used to show the viability of utilising these nanoscale machines as a highly specific and controllable method of transporting molecules around the surface of a lab-on-a-chip device. Improved reaction kinetics and increased detection sensitivity are just two advantages that could be achieved if a motor protein system could be incorporated and appropriately controlled within a device such as an immunoassay or microarray technologies. The first study focuses on the motor protein system Kinesin. This highly processive motor is able to propel microtubules across a surface and has shown promise as an in vitro nanoscale transport system. A novel device design is presented where the motility of microtubules is controlled using the combination of a structured surface and a thermoresponsive polymer. Both topographic confinement of the motility and the creation of localised ‘gates’ are used to show a method for the control and guidance of microtubules.
    [Show full text]
  • On Helicases and Other Motor Proteins Eric J Enemark and Leemor Joshua-Tor
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com On helicases and other motor proteins Eric J Enemark and Leemor Joshua-Tor Helicases are molecular machines that utilize energy derived to carry out the repetitive mechanical operation of prying from ATP hydrolysis to move along nucleic acids and to open base pairs and/or actively translocating with respect separate base-paired nucleotides. The movement of the to the nucleic acid substrate. Many other molecular helicase can also be described as a stationary helicase that motors utilize similar engines to carry out multiple pumps nucleic acid. Recent structural data for the hexameric diverse functions such as translocation of peptides E1 helicase of papillomavirus in complex with single-stranded in the case of ClpX, movement along cellular structures DNA and MgADP has provided a detailed atomic and in the case of dyenin, and rotation about an axle as in mechanistic picture of its ATP-driven DNA translocation. The F1-ATPase. structural and mechanistic features of this helicase are compared with the hexameric helicase prototypes T7gp4 and Based upon conserved sequence motifs, helicases have SV40 T-antigen. The ATP-binding site architectures of these been classified into six superfamilies [1,2]. An extensive proteins are structurally similar to the sites of other prototypical review of these superfamilies has been provided recently ATP-driven motors such as F1-ATPase, suggesting related [3]. Superfamily 1 (SF1) and superfamily 2 (SF2) heli- roles for the individual site residues in the ATPase activity. cases are very prevalent, generally monomeric, and participate in several diverse DNA and RNA manipula- Address tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility
    Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility Thomas Risler1 1Laboratoire Physicochimie Curie (CNRS-UMR 168), Institut Curie, Section de Recherche, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France (Dated: January 23, 2008) PACS numbers: 1 Article Outline Glossary I. Definition of the Subject and Its Importance II. Introduction III. The Diversity of Cell Motility A. Swimming B. Crawling C. Extensions of cell motility IV. The Cell Cytoskeleton A. Biopolymers B. Molecular motors C. Motor families D. Other cytoskeleton-associated proteins E. Cell anchoring and regulatory pathways F. The prokaryotic cytoskeleton V. Filament-Driven Motility A. Microtubule growth and catastrophes B. Actin gels C. Modeling polymerization forces D. A model system for studying actin-based motility: The bacterium Listeria mono- cytogenes E. Another example of filament-driven amoeboid motility: The nematode sperm cell VI. Motor-Driven Motility A. Generic considerations 2 B. Phenomenological description close to thermodynamic equilibrium C. Hopping and transport models D. The two-state model E. Coupled motors and spontaneous oscillations F. Axonemal beating VII. Putting It Together: Active Polymer Solutions A. Mesoscopic approaches B. Microscopic approaches C. Macroscopic phenomenological approaches: The active gels D. Comparisons of the different approaches to describing active polymer solutions VIII. Extensions and Future Directions Acknowledgments Bibliography Glossary Cell Structural and functional elementary unit of all life forms. The cell is the smallest unit that can be characterized as living. Eukaryotic cell Cell that possesses a nucleus, a small membrane-bounded compartment that contains the genetic material of the cell. Cells that lack a nucleus are called prokaryotic cells or prokaryotes. Domains of life archaea, bacteria and eukarya - or in English eukaryotes, and made of eukaryotic cells - which constitute the three fundamental branches in which all life forms are classified.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1105.2423V1 [Physics.Bio-Ph] 12 May 2011 C
    Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility Thomas Risler Institut Curie, Centre de Recherche, UMR 168 (UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS), 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005 Paris, France Article Outline C. Macroscopic phenomenological approaches: The active gels Glossary D. Comparisons of the different approaches to de- scribing active polymer solutions I. Definition of the Subject and Its Importance VIII. Extensions and Future Directions II. Introduction Acknowledgments III. The Diversity of Cell Motility Bibliography A. Swimming B. Crawling C. Extensions of cell motility IV. The Cell Cytoskeleton A. Biopolymers B. Molecular motors C. Motor families D. Other cytoskeleton-associated proteins E. Cell anchoring and regulatory pathways F. The prokaryotic cytoskeleton V. Filament-Driven Motility A. Microtubule growth and catastrophes B. Actin gels C. Modeling polymerization forces D. A model system for studying actin-based motil- ity: The bacterium Listeria monocytogenes E. Another example of filament-driven amoeboid motility: The nematode sperm cell VI. Motor-Driven Motility A. Generic considerations B. Phenomenological description close to thermo- dynamic equilibrium arXiv:1105.2423v1 [physics.bio-ph] 12 May 2011 C. Hopping and transport models D. The two-state model E. Coupled motors and spontaneous oscillations F. Axonemal beating VII. Putting It Together: Active Polymer Solu- tions A. Mesoscopic approaches B. Microscopic approaches 2 Glossary I. DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE Cell Structural and functional elementary unit of all life forms. The cell is the smallest unit that can be We, as human beings, are made of a collection of cells, characterized as living. which are most commonly considered as the elementary building blocks of all living forms on earth [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Flagellar Motor Is a Reversible Rotary Nano-Machine, About 45 Nm in Diameter, Embedded in the Bacterial Cell Envelope
    Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 41, 2 (2008), pp. 103–132. f 2008 Cambridge University Press 103 doi:10.1017/S0033583508004691 Printed in the United Kingdom Bacterialflagellar motor Yoshiyuki Sowa and Richard M. Berry* Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Abstract. The bacterial flagellar motor is a reversible rotary nano-machine, about 45 nm in diameter, embedded in the bacterial cell envelope. It is powered by the flux of H+ or Na+ ions across the cytoplasmic membrane driven by an electrochemical gradient, the proton- motive force or the sodium-motive force. Each motor rotates a helical filament at several hundreds of revolutions per second (hertz). In many species, the motor switches direction stochastically, with the switching rates controlled by a network of sensory and signalling proteins. The bacterial flagellar motor was confirmed as a rotary motor in the early 1970s, the first direct observation of the function of a single molecular motor. However, because of the large size and complexity of the motor, much remains to be discovered, in particular, the structural details of the torque-generating mechanism. This review outlines what has been learned about the structure and function of the motor using a combination of genetics, single-molecule and biophysical techniques, with a focus on recent results and single-molecule techniques. 1. Introduction 104 2. Propeller and universal joint 106 3. Energy transduction 108 3.1 Ion selectivity 108 3.2 Motor dependence upon ion-motive force 111 3.3 Torque versus speed 112 4. Mechanism of torque generation 115 4.1 Interactions between rotor and stator 115 4.2 Independent torque generating units 117 4.3 New motor structures 119 4.4 Stepping rotation 120 4.5 Models of the mechanism 123 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning Molecular Motor Transport Through Cytoskeletal Filament
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/277947; this version posted March 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Tuning molecular motor transport through cytoskeletal filament network organization Monika Scholz,1, 2 Kimberly L. Weirich,1, 2 Margaret L. Gardel,1, 2, 3 and Aaron R. Dinner1, 2, 4, ∗ 1James Franck Institute, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 2Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 3Department of Physics, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 4Department of Chemistry, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637∗ The interaction of motor proteins with intracellular filaments is required for transport processes and force generation in cells. Within a cell, crosslinking proteins organize cytoskeletal filaments both temporally and spatially to create dynamic, and structurally diverse networks. The architecture of these networks changes both the mechanics as well as the transport dynamics; however, the effects on transport are less well understood. Here, we compare the transport dynamics of myosin II motor proteins moving on model cytoskeletal networks created by common crosslinking proteins. We observe that motor dynamics change predictably based on the microstructure of the underlying networks and discuss how this can be utilized by cells to achieve specific transport goals. I. INTRODUCTION tures spatially and temporally to control the motor dy- namics. The interior of cells is organized by cytoskeletal struc- Here, we demonstrate experimentally that actin fila- tures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoskeletal Cross-Linking and Bundling in Motor-Independent
    Current Biology 20, R649–R654, August 10, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.004 Cytoskeletal Cross-linking and Bundling Minireview in Motor-Independent Contraction Sean X. Sun1, Sam Walcott1, and Charles W. Wolgemuth2,* are needed to pull up the trailing edge during cell movement and to constrict the cell circumference during division. Tradi- tionally, contractile forces are thought to originate from Eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells use cytoskeletal proteins non-muscle myosin-II, an ATP-powered molecular motor to regulate and modify cell shape. During cytokinesis or that slides actin filaments relative to each other. However, eukaryotic cell crawling, contractile forces are generated emerging evidence suggests that bundling and cross-linking inside the cell to constrict the division site or to haul the of cytoskeletal filaments may also be a general mechanism rear of the cell forward, respectively. In many cases, these for generating these forces. In this review, we summarize forces have been attributed to the activity of molecular a physical mechanism that may allow cells to produce motors, such as myosin II, which, by pulling on actin fila- contractile forces without molecular motors and discuss ments, can produce contraction of the actin cytoskeleton. evidence that this mechanism plays a role in cell motility However, prokaryotic division is driven by the tubulin-like and cell division. protein FtsZ and does not seem to require additional molecular motors to constrict the division site. Likewise, Using Cross-linking, Bundling, and Depolymerization Dictyostelium discoideum Saccharomyces cerevisiae and to Contract can perform cytokinesis under motor-free conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Molecular Motors
    An Introduction to Molecular Motors Barry Grant http://mccammon.ucsd.edu/~bgrant/ Cellular Motility is Essential for Life Fertilization Axonal Transport Muscle Contraction Just three families of motor proteins power eukaryotic cellular movement myosin kinesin dynein Cytoskeletal Transport Systems At the molecular level cytoskeletal transport systems consist of four basic components. Motor Track myosin, kinesin microfilaments and dynein and microtubules Cargo Fuel organelles, vesicles, ATP and chromosomes, etc. GTP Microtubules and microfilaments are highly organized within cells and together with motor proteins provide a framework for the redistribution and organization of cellular components. Cargo Track Motor Why Study Cytoskeletal Motor Proteins? Relevance to biology: •Motor systems intersect with almost every facet of cell biology. Relevance to medicine: •Transport defects can cause disease. • Inhibition or enhancement of motor protein activity has therapeutic benefits. Relevance to engineering: •Understanding the design principles of molecular motors will inform efforts to construct efficient nanoscale machines. Motors Are Efficient Nanoscale Machines Kinesin Automobile Size 10-8 m 1m 4 x 10-3 m/hr 105 m/hr Speed 4 x 105 lengths/hr 105 lengths/hr Efficiency ~70% ~10% Non-cytoskeletal motors DNA motors: Helicases, Polymerases Rotary motors: Bacterial Flagellum, F1-F0-ATPase Getting in Scale This Fibroblast is about 100 μM in diameter. A single microtubule is 25nm in diameter. You can also see microfilaments and intermediate filaments. Cytoskeleton Microtubules Protofilament Tubulin Heterodimer α β Key Concept: Directionality Microtubule Microfilament Tubulin Actin Track Polarity •Due to ordered arrangement of asymmetric constituent proteins that polymerize in a head-to-tail manner. •Polymerization occurs preferentially at the + end.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Machines Operated by Light
    Cent. Eur. J. Chem. • 6(3) • 2008 • 325–339 DOI: 10.2478/s11532-008-0033-4 Central European Journal of Chemistry Molecular machines operated by light Invited Review Alberto Credi*, Margherita Venturi Dipartimento di Chimica “G. Ciamician”, Università di Bologna, Via Selmi 2 – 40126 Bologna, Italy Received 11 February 2008; Accepted 22 Arpil 2008 Abstract: The bottom-up construction and operation of machines and motors of molecular size is a topic of great interest in nanoscience, and a fascinating challenge of nanotechnology. Researchers in this field are stimulated and inspired by the outstanding progress of mo- lecular biology that has begun to reveal the secrets of the natural nanomachines which constitute the material base of life. Like their macroscopic counterparts, nanoscale machines need energy to operate. Most molecular motors of the biological world are fueled by chemical reactions, but research in the last fifteen years has demonstrated that light energy can be used to power nanomachines by exploiting photochemical processes in appropriately designed artificial systems. As a matter of fact, light excitation exhibits several advantages with regard to the operation of the machine, and can also be used to monitor its state through spectroscopic methods. In this review we will illustrate the design principles at the basis of photochemically driven molecular machines, and we will describe a few examples based on rotaxane-type structures investigated in our laboratories. Keywords: Molecular device • Nanoscience • Photochemistry • Rotaxane • Supramolecular Chemistry © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1. Introduction Richard Feynman stated in his famous talk in 1959 [4]. Research on supramolecular chemistry has shown that molecules are convenient nanometer-scale building The development of civilization has always been strictly blocks that can be used, in a bottom-up approach, related to the design and construction of devices – to construct ultraminiaturized devices and machines from wheel to jet engine – capable of facilitating man [5].
    [Show full text]