Theoretical Perspectives on Biological Machines Mauro L. Mugnai∗ Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Changbong Hyeony Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea Michael Hinczewskiz Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106 D. Thirumalaix Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 Many biological functions are executed by molecular machines, which like man made motors consume energy and convert it into mechanical work. Biological machines have evolved to transport cargo, facilitate folding of proteins and RNA, remodel chromatin and replicate DNA. A common aspect of these machines is that their functions are driven by fuel provided by hydrolysis of ATP or GTP, thus driving them out of equilibrium. It is a challenge to provide a general framework for understanding the functions of bi- ological machines, such as molecular motors (kinesin, dynein, and myosin), molecular chaperones, and helicases. Using these machines, whose structures have little resem- blance to one another, as prototypical examples, we describe a few general theoretical methods that have provided insights into their functions. Although the theories rely on coarse-graining of these complex systems they have proven useful in not only accounting for many in vitro experiments but also address questions such as how the trade-off be- tween precision, energetic costs and optimal performances are balanced. However, many complexities associated with biological machines will require one to go beyond current theoretical methods. We point out that simple point mutations in the enzyme could drastically alter functions, making the motors bi-directional or result in unexpected dis- eases or dramatically restrict the capacity of molecular chaperones to help proteins fold. These examples are reminders that while the search for principles of generality in biology is intellectually stimulating, one also ought to keep in mind that molecular details must be accounted for to develop a deeper understanding of processes driven by biological machines. Going beyond generic descriptions of in vitro behavior to making genuine understanding of in vivo functions will likely remain a major challenge for some time to come. In this context, the combination of careful experiments and the use of physics and physical chemistry principles will be useful in elucidating the rules governing the workings of biological machines. CONTENTS IV. Stochastic Kinetic Models 7 A. The Master Equation 8 I. Introduction 2 B. Thermodynamics 9 C. Rate of Entropy Production 10 arXiv:1908.11323v1 [physics.bio-ph] 29 Aug 2019 II. Structures 4 D. Fluctuation Theorems 10 A. Molecular motors 4 B. Catalytic Cycle 5 V. Molecular Motors { Models without Detachment 12 A. Molecular Motors are Processive Enzymes 12 III. Biological machines are active systems. 6 B. Processive Motor Velocity 13 C. Periodic Lattice Model 13 1. One-state Models 14 2. Multi-state, Uni-cycle Models 15 3. Multi-cycle Models 17 ∗ [email protected] D. Additional remark on non-equilibrium nature of y [email protected] motors 18 z [email protected] E. Applications 19 x [email protected] 1. Myosin V and Kinesin-1 19 2 2. Dynein { an erratic motor 20 VI. Molecular Motors { Models with Detachment 20 A. Velocity Distribution 21 B. Alternate Models with Detachment 22 VII. Polymer Physics-based Approaches Incorporating Structural Features Into Kinetic Theories 23 VIII. Simulations using Coarse-Grained Models 28 IX. Cost-precision Trade-off and Efficiency of Molecular Motors 30 1. Cost-precision trade-off and its physical bound of molecular motors 30 2. Transport Efficiency 31 X. Molecular chaperones 33 XI. Universal characteristics of Helicases 36 FIG. 1 Illustration of the complexity of transportation of melanosomes, which are vesicles containing melanin. Both !1 XII. Discussion 38 dynein and kinesin-2 compete for the same binding site on A. Sometimes Details Matter 38 dynactin mediated by p150Glued. Depending on the func- B. Efficiency and optimality 38 tion (aggregation of melanosomes or their dispersion through- C. Specificity versus Promiscuity 39 out the cell) one or the other wins. When melanosomes are D. Biological complexity 39 dispersed in the cell they are transported by kinesin-2 and XIII. A Final remark 39 myosin V whereas when they aggregate dynein moves the cargo. Figure extracted from Soldati and Schliwa (2006). Acknowledgments 40 References 40 and abiotic systems. Because of functional demands in living systems, which also includes adaptation to chang- I. INTRODUCTION ing environmental conditions, it is virtually impossible to fully describe biology without evolutionary considera- The opening sentence of a perspective by Bustamante tions. Although not the focus of our perspective, the role (Bustamante et al., 2011) on the workings of nucleic acid of evolutionary constraints must also be integrated with translocases begins with the quote, \The operative indus- physical models in order to discover general principles try of Nature is so prolific that machines will be eventu- governing the functions of biological machines. ally found not only unknown to us but also unimaginable What are the characteristics of biological machines? by our mind", attributed to Marcello Malpighi, who is First, there are many varieties of machines, all of which considered the founder of microscopic anatomy, histol- should be thought of as enzymes, which consume energy ogy, and embryology. This statement, made over three and perform mechanical work to carry out specific tasks. centuries ago, is even more relevant today. It is a re- A few of the machines that we consider here are kinesin, minder that mechanical forces must play a fundamental myosin, and dynein, which are collectively referred to as role in biology. In modern times this vast subject falls molecular motors (Belyy et al., 2014a; Block, 2007; Reck- under the growing field of mechanobiology. The perva- Peterson et al., 2018; Sun and Goldman, 2011a; Vale sive role of mechanics in living systems controls motil- and Milligan, 2000). These cytoskeletal motors trans- ity on all length scales, from motion of a single cell on port cargo by walking, almost always unidirectionally, a substrate and collections of cells to dynamics at the on filamentous actin and microtubules (MT). Under in molecular level. Cooperative interactions between var- vivo conditions the motors cooperate or there could be a ious modules at the molecular level is thought to con- tug-of-war in the process of transport (see Fig. 1) (Gross trol functions at the mesoscale. A number of complex et al., 2002; Levi et al., 2006). To illustrate the diversity dynamical processes such as transcription, translation, of motor-like functions and point out certain emerging transport of vesicles and organelles, folding of proteins general principles, we also provide theoretical descrip- and RNA, and chromosome segregation control the sus- tions for the functions of molecular chaperones, which tenance and growth of cells. At some level all these bio- assist in the folding of proteins and ribozymes (RNA en- logically important processes involve molecular machines, zymes) that cannot do so spontaneously, and helicases whose ability to perform their functions, often but always with multiple functions that includes separation of dou- with high efficiency, in a noisy crowded environment is ble stranded (ds) DNA strands. Both molecular chap- truly remarkable. It is worth remembering that the abil- erones and helicases bear no structural resemblance or ity to execute a variety of functions distinguishes living sequence similarity to molecular motors. Nevertheless, 3 we are convinced that by comparing the characteristics of these seemingly unrelated machines, integrating the- ory and experiments, unifying themes and differences be- tween them could be elucidated. Second, all these motors and others not covered here (for example polymerases, ribosomes, and packaging motors) are all multidomain proteins, whose architectures are spectacularly different. Despite the vastly different sequences, structures, and evolutionary origins it is indeed the case that all of these machines utilize some form of chemical energy (gener- ated by ATP or GTP hydrolysis) in order to amplify the small local conformational changes through their struc- tural linkages to facilitate large conformational changes for functional purposes. Such conformational amplifica- tions are examples of remarkable allostery or action at a distance, and could also be couched in terms of in- FIG. 2 Significant physical timescales associated with myosin V dynamics, from the coarse-grained polymer theory model formation transfer between structural subunits that are of Hinczewski et al. (2013). spatially well separated, which in some cases (dynein for example (Bhabha et al., 2014)) can be as large as 25nm. A large number of experiments have unveiled many of the details of how these machines move by converting ular dynamics simulations have been performed to get a chemical energy into mechanical work (see for example molecular picture of certain aspects of the functions of (Hartman et al., 2011; Spudich and Sivaramakrishnan, motors (Hwang et al., 2008, 2017) and other machines 2010) (De La Cruz and Ostap, 2004; Holzbaur and Gold- (see for example (Elber and West, 2010; Ma et al., 2000; man, 2010; Sweeney and Houdusse, 2010). A remarkable Stan et al., 2005), the current limitations of such ap- number of experimental methods have