Rapid Response Achieves Eradication – Chub in Ireland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rapid Response Achieves Eradication – Chub in Ireland Rapid response achieves eradication – chub in Ireland Caffrey, J., Gallagher, K., Broughan, D., & Dick, J. (2018). Rapid response achieves eradication – chub in Ireland. In Special Issue: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species : 20th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, October 22–26, 2017. (9 ed., Vol. 8, pp. 475-482). Regional Euro-Asian Biological Invasions Centre. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2018.9.4.10 Published in: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 the authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Management of Biological Invasions (2018) Volume 9, Issue 4: 475–482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2018.9.4.10 © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC This paper is published under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species Management in Practice Rapid response achieves eradication – chub in Ireland Joe Caffrey1,2,*, Kevin Gallagher3, Dermot Broughan2 and Jaimie T.A. Dick4 1Inland Fisheries Ireland and 2INVAS Biosecurity Ltd, 82 Lakelands Close, Stillorgan, Co Dublin, Ireland 2Inland Fisheries Ireland, Ashbourne Business Park, Dock Road, Limerick, Ireland 3Agri – Food and Biosciences Institute, 18A Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, U.K. 4School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, MBC, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, U.K. Author e-mails: [email protected] (JC), [email protected] (KG), [email protected] (DB), [email protected] (JD) *Corresponding author Received: 28 February 2018 / Accepted: 5 July 2018 / Published online: 3 August 2018 Handling editor: Brenda Koenig Co-Editors’ Note: This study was contributed in relation to the 20th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, October 22–26, 2017 (http://www.icais.org/html/previous20.html). This conference has provided a venue for the exchange of information on various aspects of aquatic invasive species since its inception in 1990. The conference continues to provide an opportunity for dialog between academia, industry and environmental regulators. Abstract Rapid reaction to the initial discovery of invasive alien species (IAS) is key to eradication, but this is often frustrated by lack of resources and coordinated actions. However, examples of successful eradications may encourage and empower others to follow. Chub (Squalius cephalus) were illegally introduced into the River Inny in Ireland in the late 1990s or early 2000s, reputedly by anglers. The habitat in this river is favourable for chub and, should this species establish, it would likely compete with the indigenous fish communities and impact on other flora and fauna. Central Fisheries Board (now Inland Fisheries Ireland) coordinated chub removal operations and provided the necessary resources (manpower and equipment) to effectively remove chub from this large river. Three electric fishing crews supported by two tank boats and land-based personnel were required in each operation to effectively remove the chub. These crews worked on this task each year between 2006 and 2013. Between 2006 and 2008, 24 adult and two juvenile chub were removed and euthanised. In 2008, two chub were radio-tagged, released back to the river and tracked monthly for 12 months. Over the next two years these “Judas” chub, and two untagged male chub that were located in proximity to the tagged fish, were removed from the river. Intensive electric fishing of the river and regular contact with the local angling community between 2010 and 2017 revealed no further chub specimens. Monitoring of the fish populations in the river will continue but it is suspected that chub may have been eradicated from this river system and, hence, from the island of Ireland. This provides a rare case study of the potential to eradicate aquatic IAS when rapid reaction is resourced and coordinated. Key words: invasive species, freshwater fishes, rivers, competition, electric fishing Introduction (Butchart et al. 2010) and this has impacted native ecosystems (Nunes et al. 2015). The trend in IAS The introduction of species outside their natural range introductions in Ireland has increased dramatically is widely recognised as one of the main threats to since the beginning of the twentieth century and has biodiversity and the second leading cause of animal accelerated in the last two decades. This is particularly extinctions (MEA 2005). With increased globalisa- the case in inland waters, where the rate of increase tion, the number of invasive alien species (IAS) in among high-impact IAS has been greatest since the Europe has increased by 76% between 1970 and 2007 early 1980s (O’Flynn et al. 2014). 475 J. Caffrey et al. Eradication is the removal of every potentially (Esox lucius Linnaeus). Coarse angling is most popular reproducing individual of a species or the reduction on Ireland’s large river, canal and lake systems, of their population density below sustainable levels particularly in the midlands of the country. The (Myers et al. 2000). In Europe, relatively few eradica- species most sought after include roach (Rutilus rutilus tions have been successfully completed and most of Linnaeus), bream (Abramis brama Cuvier), roach × these have been on small islands or at a local scale. bream hybrids, rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus In addition, the majority of these eradications have Linnaeus), tench (Tinca tinca Linnaeus) and perch involved terrestrial vertebrates, with invertebrates, plants (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus). While the market among or marine organisms (including fishes) rarely featuring domestic Irish anglers for coarse fishing is significant, (Genovesi 2005). However, once IAS have become that among visiting English anglers, and particularly established in an ecosystem, eradication may be an English competition anglers, is far greater. unachievable management option (Leuven et al. 2017). Currently, there are four freshwater fish species One reason why there are not more examples of that are considered invasive in Ireland and are on the successful eradications relates to the often limited list of non-native species that are subject to restric- ability to detect early invasions and to rapidly react tions under the EC (Birds and Natural Habitats) in a sufficiently robust manner when IAS incursions Regulations 2011 (Statutory Instrument 477/2011). are detected. It is clear that early detection coupled These are dace (Leuciscus leuciscus Linnaeus) and with appropriate rapid response will increase the roach, common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus) and likelihood of preventing the establishment and spread chub (Squalius cephalus Linnaeus). Dace and roach of recently introduced IAS. For early detection and have been in the country since they were introduced rapid response to be successful, three main compo- by English anglers in 1889 (Fitzmaurice 1984). The nents are required: (1) processes and plans to guide roach has spread widely in Irish watercourses in the detection and response actions, (2) tools with which recent decades and is now regarded as being natu- to respond, and (3) the capability and resources to ralised in the country (Caffrey et al. 2008). The spread see the response to a successful conclusion (Wotton of dace in Ireland, on the other hand, has been a more and Hewitt 2004). It is clear, also, that the response recent phenomenon and currently is directly impacting must be made sufficiently early in the invasion on native fishes in invaded rivers for food, habitat process to prevent the more widespread establish- and spawning substrates (Caffrey et al. 2007). The ment and impact of the target IAS. Being an island first reported introduction of common carp into the nation on the western edge of Europe, Ireland’s country was in 1626 (Grosart and Boyle 1886; freshwater fish community is less rich than that of Brazier et al. 2012). The fourth invasive species is Britain or mainland Europe (Moriarty and Fitzmaurice chub, which was only confirmed to be present in 2000). However, Ireland has an international reputation Ireland, in the River Inny, in 2005. Indications from as a destination for recreational anglers seeking wild angling reports were that small numbers of chub (no fish
Recommended publications
  • ISFC Annual Report 1999
    1999 Salmon, Sea Trout . 3 Location Map for Awards Presentation in Doyle Burlington Brown Trout (Lake) . 4 Brown Trout (River) . 5 Bream . 6 Pike (Lake), Pike (River) . 8 Carp . 10 Eel, Roach/Bream Hybrid . 11 Rudd/Bream Hybrid, Perch . .12 Tench . 13 Bass . 14 Coalfish, Cod, Conger Eel, Dab, Greater Spotted Dogfish . 15 Lesser Spotted Dogfish, Spur Dogfish . 16 Flounder, Garfish, Grey Gurnard . 17 Red Gurnard, Tub Gurnard, Ling . 18 Mackerel . 19 Grey Mullet, Plaice . 20 ONTENTS Pollack, Pouting . 21 Blonde Ray, Homelyn Ray, Painted Ray . 22 Sting Ray, Three Bearded Rockling, Twaite Shad . 24 C Blue Shark . 25 Tope, Torsk, Ballan Wrasse, Cuckoo Wrasse . 26 New Records, Ten Species Award, Ten Pin Awards, Special Award for Juveniles, The Minister’s Award, . .27 Revised Specimen Weight/New Class, Special Notice, Limitation on Number of Claims, Exclusion from Specimen Status, Weighing of Fish, Metrification . 28 Common Skate, Captors Addresses, Distribution of Specimen Awards . .29 Acknowledgements, Presentation of Awards 1998, Fund Raising . 30 Accounts, Donations . 31 Use of the information contained in this report for press articles Balance Sheet . 32 and publicity is encouraged. It may be quoted without charge, Irish Record Fish Listing . 33 provided the source is acknowledged. Schedule of Specimen Weights (Revised) . 35 The report is copyright and prior permission to reproduce the Rules . 37 data for any other purpose other than reasonable review or Weighing Scale Certification – List of Centres . .40 analysis must be obtained in writing from the Irish Specimen Fish “Read it Carefully” by Des Brennan . 42 Committee. “Maybe we’ll stay at home this year!” by Derek Evans .
    [Show full text]
  • EREP 2017 Annual Report
    EREP 2017 Annual Report Inland Fisheries Ireland & the Office of Public Works Environmental River Enhancement Programme Acknowledgments The assistance and support of OPW staff, of all grades, from each of the three Drainage Maintenance Regions is gratefully appreciated. The support provided by regional IFI officers, in respect of site inspections and follow up visits and assistance with electrofishing surveys is also acknowledged. Overland access was kindly provided by landowners in a range of channels and across a range of OPW drainage schemes. Project Personnel Members of the EREP team include: Dr. James King Brian Coghlan MSc (Res) Amy McCollom IFI Report Number: IFI/2018/1-4430 CITATION: Coghlan, B., McCollom, A., and King, J.J. (2018) Environmental River Enhancement Programme Summary Report 2017. Inland Fisheries Ireland, 3044 Lake Drive, Citywest, Dublin 24, Ireland. © Inland Fisheries Ireland 2018 The report includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OSi Copyright Permit No. MP 007508. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright. © Ordnance Survey Ireland, 2016. Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Inny Survey Programme ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Long-term Monitoring ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning Strategies in Cypriniform Fishes in a Lowland River Invaded By
    Hydrobiologia (2020) 847:4031–4047 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04394-9 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER Spawning strategies in cypriniform fishes in a lowland river invaded by non-indigenous European barbel Barbus barbus Catherine Gutmann Roberts . J. Robert Britton Received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 23 August 2020 / Published online: 4 September 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Spawning strategies of lowland river remained relatively small by the end of their growth fishes include single spawning, where reproduction season (October). For dace Leuciscus leuciscus, only generally occurs in early spring to provide 0? fish single spawning events were evident, but with 0? dace with an extended growth season through the summer, always being relatively large. Therefore, multiple but with a high risk of stochastic mortality events spawning appears to be a common strategy that occurring, such as early summer floods. This risk can provides resilience in 0? fish against stochastic be reduced by multiple or protracted spawning strate- mortality events in lowland rivers. gies, where 0? fish are produced over an extended period, often into mid-summer, but with the trade-off Keywords Spawning strategies Á Invasion biology Á being a shorter growth season. The spawning strate- Recruitment Á Cypriniform Á Barbus gies of cypriniform fish were explored in the River Teme, a spate river in Western England, which has non-indigenous European barbel Barbus barbus pre- sent. Sampling 0? fish in spring and summer and Introduction across three spawning periods, B. barbus, chub Squalius cephalus and minnow Phoxinus phoxinus In temperate lowland rivers, larval and juvenile fish in always revealed multiple spawning events, with 0? their first year of life (‘0?’) may face episodic flood fish of \ 20 mm present in samples collected from events that can be deleterious to their cohorts, June to August.
    [Show full text]
  • Locks and Bridges on Ireland's Inland Waterways an Abundance of Fixed
    ack eachers Resource P ways – Primary School T All About Water Locks and Bridges on Ireland’s Inland Waterways Ireland’s inland waterways boast an abundance of fixed and moveable bridges as well as offering a variety of locks to experience as you journey along the different waterways. Did you know? Did you know? The locks on the Shannon Navigation and the Shannon- Locks vary in size and depth Erne Waterway are hydraulically e.g. the length of the lock on operated while the locks along the Erne System is 36mtrs and the other navigations are 1.2mtrs deep. The length of a manually operated. lock on the Shannon Navigation is 29.2mtrs and 1.35mtrs deep. Ballinamore Lock im aterway this Lock . Leitr Located on the Shannon-Erne W n in Co ck raulic lock operated by boat users gh Alle ulic lo lock is a hyd Drumshanbon Lou ydra ugh the use of a smart card cated o ock is a h thro Lo anbo L eeper rumsh ock-K D ed by a L operat The Grand Canal 30th Lock Did you know? Located on the Grand Canal the 30th Lock is operated manually through the use of a lock A lock is a device for raising key and lowering boats between stretches of water of different levels on rivers and canals. Activity Arrange a visit to your nearest lock and find out the following information: a. The name of the lock? b. Is it a manual or automated lock? c. How old is the lock? d.
    [Show full text]
  • How Barriers Shape Freshwater Fish Distributions: a Species Distribution Model Approach
    1 How barriers shape freshwater fish distributions: a species distribution model approach 2 3 Mathias Kuemmerlen1* [email protected] 4 Stefan Stoll1,2 [email protected] 5 Peter Haase1,3 [email protected] 6 7 1Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River 8 Ecology and Conservation, Clamecystr. 12, D-63571 Gelnhausen, Germany 9 2University of Koblenz-Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, 10 Germany 11 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Essen, Germany 12 *Corresponding author: Tel: +49 6051-61954-3120 13 Fax: +49 6051-61954-3118 14 15 Running title: How barriers shape fish distributions 16 17 Word count main text = 4679 18 1 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2112v2 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 18 Aug 2016, publ: 18 Aug 2016 19 Abstract 20 Aim 21 Barriers continue to be built globally despite their well-known negative effects on freshwater 22 ecosystems. Fish habitats are disturbed by barriers and the connectivity in the stream network 23 reduced. We implemented and assessed the use of barrier data, including their size and 24 magnitude, in distribution predictions for 20 species of freshwater fish to understand the 25 impacts on freshwater fish distributions. 26 27 Location 28 Central Germany 29 30 Methods 31 Obstruction metrics were calculated from barrier data in three different spatial contexts 32 relevant to fish migration and dispersal: upstream, downstream and along 10km of stream 33 network. The metrics were included in a species distribution model and compared to a model 34 without them, to reveal how barriers influence the distribution patterns of fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Life-History Traits Correlate with Temporal Trends in Freshwater Fish
    Life-history traits correlate with temporal trends in freshwater fish populations for common European species Rafael Santos, Besnard Aurélien, Raphaël Santos, Nicolas Poulet, Aurélien Besnard To cite this version: Rafael Santos, Besnard Aurélien, Raphaël Santos, Nicolas Poulet, Aurélien Besnard. Life-history traits correlate with temporal trends in freshwater fish populations for common European species. Freshwater Biology, Wiley, 2021, 66 (2), pp.317-331. 10.1111/fwb.13640. hal-03177433 HAL Id: hal-03177433 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03177433 Submitted on 23 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Received: 28 October 2019 | Revised: 23 September 2020 | Accepted: 29 September 2020 DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13640 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Life-history traits correlate with temporal trends in freshwater fish populations for common European species Raphaël Santos1,2 | Nicolas Poulet3 | Aurélien Besnard1 1EPHE, PSL Research University, CNRS, INRA, UMR 5175 CEFE, Montpellier, France Abstract 2HES-SO / HEPIA, University of Applied 1. Understanding the population dynamics of aquatic species and how inter-specific Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, variation in demographic and life history traits influence population dynamics is cru- Ecology and Engineering of Aquatic Systems Research Group, Jussy, Switzerland cial to define their conservation status and design appropriate protection measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbeyshrule, Co. Longford Unique ID
    Location: Abbeyshrule, Co. Longford Unique ID: 260,446 (from PFRA database) Initial OPW Designation APSR AFRR IRR Co-ordinates Easting: 223,250 Northing: 260,250 River / Catchment / Sub-catchment River Inny / Owenacharra River / River Shannon (Lough Ree) Type of Flooding / Flood Risk Fluvial non-tidal Fluvial tidal Coastal (identify all that apply) Stage 1: Desktop Review River Flow Path 1.1 Flood History The River Inny flows through the township of Abbeyshrule on the eastern (include review of town boundary whilst the Royal Canal forms the perimeter on the western Floodmaps.ie) side. The village has a canal harbour with a boat slip. Flood Event Records There are no records of flood events for Abbeyshrule on floodmaps.ie. PFRA database comments (in italics) : 1.2 Relevant information on OPW comments flooding issues from Designated APSR on the basis of predictive analysis. OPW and LA staff LA comments Inny Abbeyshrule - Potentially due to new development – twenty houses. Questioned the extent shown in the PFRA maps. Possibly not the experience but not to be ruled out. Should be compared to 2009 flood extent. Farmland. Meeting / discussion summary comments: OPW comments • There are no flood risk issues that they are aware of. • The land downstream is low and acts as floodplain. • New houses near the church may be at risk. • The airfield is not known to be at significant risk. LA comments • Farmland flooded during the November 2009 event. • A public water supply intake is located upstream of the village; this is the source for the regional water supply. • The airfield was just about operational during the 2009 floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Leuciscus Cephalus
    ne Risk Assessment of Leuciscus cephalus Name of Organism: Leuciscus cephalus Linnaeus 1758 – Chub Objective: Assess the risks associated with this species in Ireland Version: Final 15/09/2014 Author(s) Michael Millane and Joe Caffrey Expert reviewer Rob Britton Stage 1 - Organism Information Stage 2 - Detailed Assessment Section A - Entry Section B - Establishment Section C - Spread Section D - Impact Section E - Conclusion Section F - Additional Questions About the risk assessment This risk assessment is based on the Non-native species AP plication based Risk Analysis (NAPRA) tool (version 2.66). NAPRA is a computer based tool for undertaking risk assessment of any non- native species. It was developed by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) and adapted for Ireland and Northern Ireland by Invasive Species Ireland. It is based on the Computer Aided Pest Risk Analysis (CAPRA) software package which is a similar tool used by EPPO for risk assessment. Notes: Confidence is rated as low, medium, high or very high. Likelihood is rated as very unlikely, unlikely, moderately likely, likely or very likely. The percentage categories are 0% - 10%, 11% - 33%, 34% - 67%, 68% - 90% or 91% - 100%. N/A = not applicable. This is a joint project by Inland Fisheries Ireland and the National Biodiversity Data Centre to inform risk assessments of non-native species for the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011. It is supported by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Page 1 of 23 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Risk Assessment of Leuciscus cephalus Name of Document: Dr Michael Millane and Dr Joe Caffrey Author (s): Dr Joe Caffrey Authorised Officer: Non-native species risk assessment Description of Content: Dr Cathal Gallagher Approved by: 15/09/2014 Date of Approval: n/a Assigned review period: n/a Date of next review: n/a Document Code List of No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Continental-Scale Analysis of Fish Assemblage Functional Structure in European Rivers Maxime Logez, Pierre Bady, Andreas Melcher, Didier Pont
    A continental-scale analysis of fish assemblage functional structure in European rivers Maxime Logez, Pierre Bady, Andreas Melcher, Didier Pont To cite this version: Maxime Logez, Pierre Bady, Andreas Melcher, Didier Pont. A continental-scale analysis of fish assemblage functional structure in European rivers. Ecography, Wiley, 2013, 36 (1), pp.80-91. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07447.x. hal-00835204 HAL Id: hal-00835204 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00835204 Submitted on 18 Jun 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A continental-scale analysis of fish assemblage functional structure in European rivers Maxime Logez*, Pierre Bady†‡, Andreas Melcher◊ and Didier Pont*. * Irstea, UR HBAN, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes - CS 10030, F-92761 Antony, France. † University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. ‡ Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Core Facility, Quartier UNIL-Sorge Bâtiment Génopode, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland ◊ Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Strasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria. Correspondence: Maxime Logez Address: Irstea, UR HBAN, 1 rue Pierre-Gilles de Gennes - CS 10030, F-92761 Antony, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Status of Burbot and Conservation Measures
    F I S H and F I S H E R I E S , 2010, 11, 34–56 Worldwide status of burbot and conservation measures Martin A Stapanian1, Vaughn L Paragamian2, Charles P Madenjian3, James R Jackson4, Jyrki Lappalainen5, Matthew J Evenson6 & Matthew D Neufeld7 1U. S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Erie Biological Station, 6100 Columbus Avenue, Sandusky, OH 44870, USA; 2Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2885 W. Kathleen Avenue, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815, USA; 3U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; 4Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Biological Field Station, 900 Shackelton Point Road, Bridgeport, NY 13030, USA; 5Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FIN-00014, Finland; 6Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, AK 99701-1551, USA; 7BC Ministry of Environment, #401-333 Victoria Street, Nelson, BC, Canada V1L 4K3 Abstract Correspondence: Although burbot (Lota lota Gadidae) are widespread and abundant throughout much Martin A Stapanian, U. S. Geological of their natural range, there are many populations that have been extirpated, Survey, Great Lakes endangered or are in serious decline. Due in part to the species’ lack of popularity as a Science Center, Lake game and commercial fish, few regions consider burbot in management plans. We Erie Biological review the worldwide population status of burbot and synthesize reasons why some Station, 6100 burbot populations are endangered or declining, some burbot populations have Columbus Avenue, Sandusky, OH 44870, recovered and some burbot populations do not recover despite management USA measures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inland Waterways of Ireland 1St Edition 2002 ISBN 085288 424 9
    The Inland Waterways of Ireland 1st Edition 2002 ISBN 085288 424 9 Supplement No.1 Supplement Date: February 2011 This replaces all previous supplements Caution Erne Charter Boat Association www.boat-holidays.com Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this supplement. It contains selected information and thus is Royal Canal Amenity Group www.royalcanal.net not definitive and does not include all known information River Bann and Lough Neagh Association on the subject in hand; this is particularly relevant to the http://riverbannloughneagh.org plans, which should not be used for navigation. The Tourism Ireland www.discoverireland.com author and Imray Laurie Norie and Wilson Ltd believe that Northern Ireland its selection is a useful aid to prudent navigation, but the www.discovernorthernireland.com safety of a vessel depends ultimately on the judgement of Afloat magazine www.afloat.ie the navigator, who should assess all information, National Trust www.nationaltrust.org.uk published or unpublished, available to him. Sustrans www.sustrans.org.uk This supplement contains amendments and corrections sent in by cruising yachtsmen and women. The updating Restorations and new projects of cruising guides is an ongoing process and the publisher Royal Canal is always glad to receive information, sketch charts or photographs for incorporation in future supplements or On 1st October 2010 the Royal Canal was opened through new editions. to Richmond Harbour in Co. Longford and so access to the Shannon was re-established for the first time in over 50 Note where lights have been modified in this text do please years.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Salmon and Sea Trout Catch Statistics Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairman’s Statement 2 The Central and Regional Fisheries Boards 3 Introduction 4 Chapter 1 Summary Commercial and Angling Catch Statistics 2001 - 2009 5 Chapter 2 Summary Commercial Catch Statistics 2001 - 2009 8 Chapter 3 Summary Angling Catch Statistics 2001 - 2009 11 Chapter 4 Commercial and Angling Catch Tables 2009 16 Chapter 5 Commercial Catch Tables 2009 20 Chapter 6 Angling Catch Tables 2009 26 Chapter 7 Angling Catch Graphs and Charts 2009 58 Appendix i Map of Districts, Open, Catch and Release, and Closed Rivers 2009 70 Appendix ii Legislation 72 Appendix iii References 73 Appendix iv Glossary of Terms used in Report 74 1 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT I am delighted to present the 2009 Wild Salmon and Sea Trout Fisheries Statistics Report. This annual report maps trends in the stocks of salmon and sea trout since 2001 from both the commercial and recreational fisheries sectors. This report provides valuable information to fisheries’ managers, scientists, policy makers and legislators and assists in the design and implementation of policies and strategies for the conservation of salmon and sea trout stocks in Ireland. The 2009 statistics show that the total number of salmon harvested by all methods was 24,278 – which represent a decrease of 22% on the total harvest recorded in 2008 . 2009 proved a difficult year for both anglers and commercial fishermen with the deterioration in catches due to unfavourable fishing conditions, high water levels, marine survival rates and some late fish runs at key fishing periods. The 2009 commercial catch was 6,757 salmon and 45 sea trout (over 40 cm) which was only 37% of the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) allocated to the sector.
    [Show full text]